Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
03-Sep-25 AA- A1+ Stable Maintain -
06-Sep-24 AA- A1+ Stable Maintain -
06-Sep-23 AA- A1+ Stable Maintain -
09-Sep-22 AA- A1+ Stable Maintain -
09-Sep-21 AA- A1+ Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Bestway Cement operates as one of the largest cement manufacturers of the country with total cement capacity of ~15.3mln tons p.a. Bestway Cement, listed on PSX, is majority owned by Bestway Group (BWG) UK (72.7%), mainly through corporates (60%), followed by individuals (~12.3%). The Company's nine-member board comprises mainly BWG nominees. Two directors are Bestway Cement's executives (including CEO) while seven are non-executive directors including three independent members. The board’s Chairman Mr. M. Anwar Pervez is an experienced professional, also a founding member of Bestway Group. The CEO, Mr. Zameer Mohammed Choudrey, is a Chartered Accountant, associated with the group since 1984, supported by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

Bestway Cement Limited’s (“the Company”) ratings reflect its leading position in the cement sector, underpinned by its sizeable market share in the northern region. The Company has successfully maintained this position through both organic and inorganic capacity enhancement initiatives. In line with the industry’s expansionary phase and to sustain its competitive edge, Bestway completed two major projects in FY23: a Greenfield cement plant and a Brownfield production line, each with a clinker capacity of 7,200 tonnes per day, complemented by a 9 MW Waste Heat Recovery Power Plant. These additions elevated the Company’s total cement production capacity to ~15.3 million tons per annum. During FY25, overall industry dispatches recorded a modest growth of 3%, rising from 44.8 million tons in FY24 to 46.0 million tons. This uptick was primarily driven by a robust 30% increase in export volumes, which grew from 7.1 million tons to 9.2 million tons. While the Company’s total production remained stable, its overall dispatches contracted by 2%. However, in contrast to the industry trend of weakening domestic demand, Bestway posted a ~2% decline in domestic volumetric sales, supported by the incremental capacity available from FY24 expansions. The Company’s revenue growth was supported by sustained sales volumes and an upward adjustment in selling prices, which was necessitated by persistent escalation in input costs. These measures enabled the Company to preserve margins, reflecting the effectiveness of its strategic and operational adjustments. On the financial front, management’s concerted deleveraging efforts have significantly reduced the Company’s financial risk profile. By June 2025, the leverage ratio had declined to 31.2%, from 49.7% in June 2024. Furthermore, the recent reduction in policy rates is expected to strengthen financial flexibility and reduce finance costs, thereby providing additional support to profitability. The ratings are further reinforced by steady dividend income from the Company’s strategic investment in United Bank Limited (UBL), in which Bestway has enhanced its shareholding from 8.16% to 9.6%. This investment continues to provide a stable income stream and complements the Company’s core operations.

Key Rating Drivers

The Company's business performance with local demand remains vital with focus on sustaining margins. The ratings also draw comfort from the strong sponsor support (Bestway Group). The ratings are dependent on upholding of company’s leading market position along with sustenance of business volumes and margins. The company's good business performance as compared to other players in current stretched economic scenario - challenges on demand front - remains vital for ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Bestway Cement Limited (Bestway Cement or 'The Company') – Flagship Company of Bestway Group (BG) – is a public limited company. The company obtained listing on Pakistan Stock Exchange on April 9, 2001. Bestway Cement registered Head Office is situated at College Road, F- 7 Markaz, Islamabad. The company has multiple cement manufacturing facilities which are established at locations of Hattar, Farooqia, Chakwal, Kallar Kahar & Mianwali. The company’s sales office is located in Rawalpindi.


Background

Bestway Cement was formally incorporated in 1993 and commenced operations in 1998. The company has history of successful acquisitions of cement plants. These acquisitions have contributed in solidifying the company’s footprint in Pakistani cement industry. Latest acquisition held was of ‘Pakcem Limited’ with and into Bestway Cement. In Aug-16, the Islamabad High court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of Pakcem Limited – 88% owned subsidiary – with and into Bestway Cement; the effective date of the merger is September 16, 2016. Bestway Cement vividly consolidated operations of Pakcem with the parent company in time of one and half years.


Operations

The main business activity of the Company is the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of cement and clinker. Installed cement manufacturing capacity of 15.3 mln tons p.a (Based on 300 days). The key products include i) Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), ii) Pakcem, iii) Sulphate Resistant Cement, iv) Quick Setting Cement, v) Low Alkali OPC, and vi) Clinker. The Company operates through distributors, dealers, and retailers in the local market.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Bestway Cement is majority owned (72.7%) by Bestway Group (BWG), UK, a diversified conglomerate with interests across cement, banking, wholesale, and healthcare sectors. The Group’s shareholding in the Company is primarily routed through corporate entities (~60%), while individuals from the sponsoring family collectively hold around 12.3%. Key holding vehicles include Bestway International Holdings Limited and Bestway Foundation.


Stability

There has been no change in the majority ownership strucuture. Moreover, the Company does not have any plans for corporate restructuring or discontinuation of any business unit operations. Hence, the ownership structure is expected to remain stable in the near future.


Business Acumen

The Company has a long-standing track record in the cement sector, which demonstrates the sponsors’ expertise in navigating various economic cycles and their deep understanding of industry dynamics. Bestway Group, the principal sponsor, is a British multinational conglomerate headquartered in London, United Kingdom, with operations spanning both the UK and Pakistan. Over the past several decades, the Group has built a diversified business portfolio, including interests in cement, banking, wholesale, and healthcare. This diversified presence reflects the sponsors’ strong business acumen, prudent investment strategy, and ability to create synergies across sectors. The Group’s established reputation and extensive experience provide strategic depth and financial strength to Bestway Cement, reinforcing its ability to sustain market leadership while adapting to evolving macroeconomic and sectoral challenges.


Financial Strength

Bestway Group (BWG), is a diversified multinational conglomerate. As of June 2024, the Group reported total equity of £2.2 billion, total assets of £24 billion, and net income of £77 billion. The Group’s business interests span across wholesale trade, cement manufacturing, global banking, real estate, and pharmaceuticals. This broad-based portfolio not only underscores BWG’s strong financial standing but also reflects its ability to generate stable and diversified cash flows. The Group’s robust financial profile provides comfort to Bestway Cement, offering both strategic and financial support when required.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors comprises nine members, predominantly nominated by Bestway Group (BWG). Of these, two directors are executive members, including the Chief Executive Officer, while the remaining seven are non-executive directors, three of whom serve as independent members. The composition reflects a balanced governance structure, ensuring representation of both management and independent oversight. Importantly, the Board’s structure and practices are fully aligned with the Code of Corporate Governance applicable to listed companies, thereby reinforcing compliance, transparency, and accountability in decision-making.


Members’ Profile

The Board members are equipped with the necessary skill set, supported by their diversified professional backgrounds across business, finance, and industry. This provides the Company with a strong governance framework and effective strategic oversight. Sir Mohammed Anwar Pervez, has been associated with Bestway Group since its inception in 1984.  A leadership transition took place within Bestway Group last year, wherein Mr. Zameer M. Choudrey has assumed the role of Chairman, while his son has taken over as Chief Executive Officer. However, this change was not reflected in the Bestway Cement through its group. He has played a pivotal role in transforming it into one of the largest and most diversified business conglomerates with operations in the United Kingdom and Pakistan. Sir Anwar established a strong foothold in the wholesale business, which later expanded into cement manufacturing, financial services, real estate, and healthcare.


Board Effectiveness

To assist the Board in the decision-making process, four specialized committees are in place, namely the i) Audit Committee,  ii) Human Resource and Remuneration Committee, iii) Nomination Committee, and iv) Risk Management Committee. Each of these committees plays a distinct role in strengthening governance practices. During the year four (4) audit committee meetings were held, out of which two (2) were also attended by the External auditors of the Company.

The Audit Committee oversees financial reporting, internal controls, and audit functions, while the HR&R Committee is responsible for policies relating to human capital, performance evaluation, and compensation. The Nomination Committee manages board nominations, succession planning, and assessment of board effectiveness, whereas the Risk Management Committee focuses on identifying, assessing, and mitigating strategic, financial, and operational risks. Collectively, these committees enhance the effectiveness of the Board by ensuring transparency, accountability, and informed decision-making.


Financial Transparency

The Company 's external auditors M/s. A.F. Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, has given unqualified opinion on the company’s financial statements for the year ended June, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

Bestway Cement operates under a multi-tier organizational structure that is divided into five key functions: i) Administration, Marketing and Corporate Affairs; ii) Finance & IT; iii) Procurement, Planning and Coordination; iv) Works; and v) Sales. Each of these functions is headed by a dedicated director who reports to the Managing Director. The structure is designed to ensure operational efficiency, with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines. A high degree of delegation across the hierarchy enables swift decision-making and effective execution of strategic and operational initiatives.


Management Team

The Company is led by Mr. Zameer M. Choudrey, ICAEW, who has been associated with Bestway Cement since 1994. A leadership transition took place within Bestway Group last year, wherein Mr. Zameer M. Choudrey has assumed the role of Chairman, while his son has taken over as Chief Executive Officer. However, this change was not reflected in the Bestway Cement through its group. Although based in the United Kingdom due to his wider professional responsibilities, Mr. Choudrey maintains close oversight of the Company’s operations, frequently visiting Pakistan and remaining actively involved in all strategic, business, and financial decision-making processes.

The finance function is headed by Mr. Muhammad Danish Khan, who is currently designated as Chief Financial Officer. His progression within the Company reflects management’s emphasis on internal capacity building and the development of leadership talent. Collectively, the senior management team is equipped with the necessary technical skills, professional expertise, and sector-specific experience, enabling the Company to sustain its operational efficiency and strategic growth trajectory.


Effectiveness

A monthly Coordination Committee (ManCom) meeting is convened, attended by the CEO (either in person or via teleconference), four Executive Directors, and five General Managers Works. These meetings serve as a structured platform for reviewing the Company’s operational performance, monitoring progress against strategic objectives, and addressing key challenges. Decisions are taken on the spot, ensuring timely resolution of issues and effective coordination across functions. This practice reflects the Company’s emphasis on efficiency, accountability, and collaborative management.


MIS

The Company has implemented a SAP-based ERP system, which integrates core business processes and supports efficiency across operations. In addition, a comprehensive Management Information System (MIS) is in place, providing timely and detailed reporting to department heads. This facilitates effective monitoring, informed decision-making, and enhanced operational control.


Control Environment

The Company’s manufacturing facilities are geographically well-spread, providing strategic access to key markets while ensuring operational flexibility. All plants are equipped with state-of-the-art technology infrastructure, enabling efficiency, consistency in quality, and adherence to environmental standards. To meet its energy requirements, the Company benefits from a diversified mix of power sources, including Waste Heat Recovery Power Plants (WHRPP), boilers, WAPDA supply, and gas-based generators. This diversified energy portfolio not only enhances reliability of power supply but also supports cost optimization and sustainability objectives.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The cement industry in Pakistan remained under strain throughout FY2025, with minimal growth of 3% to a total of 46.004million tons, primarily due to economic instability, high inflation, elevated interest rates, and suppressed public and private construction activity. Domestic sales declined by 2% to 37.01 million tons, while export dispatches surged by 30% to 9.2 million tons. Despite an increase in installed capacity to 84.5 million tons per annum, capacity utilization remained weak at ~53% due to sluggish demand. Manufacturers faced significant cost pressures from rising electricity tariffs, and higher royalty rates, especially in Punjab, where a shift to 6% of ex-factory price created a cost gap of up to PKR 1,000/ton versus other provinces. A temporary stay on this royalty regime is currently in place. To maintain margins, manufacturers passed on increased input costs to consumers. Many also continued their shift toward renewable energy sources like solar and Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) to reduce operating costs and improve sustainability. Regulatory developments included the implementation of a Minimum Retail Price (MRP) by the FBR for improved sales tax compliance and a continued burden from FED and provincial royalties. On the policy front, the PM’s Cement Export Task Force has committed to resolving structural issues, such as axle load limits, port congestion, and rail bottlenecks, to facilitate exports, which rose to 9.2 million tons in FY25. Looking ahead, macroeconomic indicators such as falling inflation, declining policy rates, and exchange rate stability offer cautious optimism. The approval of a PKR 4.2 trillion development budget, potential revival of CPEC Phase II, and housing schemes are expected to drive gradual demand recovery. However, realization depends on timely implementation and sustained improvement in construction activity.


Relative Position

After commencement of cement production in browneld cement plant at Hattar of 7,200 tonnes of clinker per day and the greeneld plant at Mianwali site on 17 February 2023 and 29 March 2023 respectively, the Company’s capacity has increased to ~15.3 million tonnes of cement per annum, bringing it at par with the capacity of Lucky Cement. They are followed by Fauji cement with ~7mln MT capacities respectively. Company’s total cement dispatches decreased by 2%, which is lower than the industry increase of 3%. This is mainly due to low demand and intense competition in the market, during the period under review. Despite intense competition, Bestway has successfully maintained its strong market position in the north region.


Revenues

During FY25, volumetric analysis reveals that the Company’s total production witnessed stability whereas, the dispatches decreased by 2%. Local-export dispatches mix (FY25: 99:1; FY24: 99:1), almost remained filled by domestic market sales. Total cement capacity utilization slightly declined to 44.7% (FY24: 44.8%) due to an decrease in local demand. The company’s net turnover witnessed an upward trend and recorded at PKR 107bln in FY25 as compared to PKR 103bln in FY24 due to stable volumes sold coupled higher selling price, while profits were recorded at PKR ~23bln (FY24: PKR 13bln). Going forward, the Company’s capacity utilization and sustainability of profits remain stable due to reduced interest rates and sustained domestic market sales.


Margins

The Company has successfully preserved and enhanced its margins through effective cost optimization measures. In FY25, the reported Gross Profit Margin improved to 34.6%, up from 31% in FY24, primarily supported by successful price adjustments during the year. Similarly, the Net Profit Margin strengthened to 22.1% during 9MFY25, compared to 13.2% in FY24, resulting from lower leveraging and reduce kibor rates, reflecting improved operational efficiency and sustained pricing discipline.


Sustainability

Despite facing a host of economic and political challenges, the Company successfully commissioned two state-of-the-art cement plants, along with Waste Heat Recovery Power Plants (WHRPP), at Mianwali and Hattar during FY23. These expansions have positioned Bestway Cement better within the country. In line with its sustainability agenda, the Company is progressively reducing its dependence on the national grid through alternative energy solutions. Solar power facilities have been installed across all five plant locations, complemented by WHRPPs, thereby ensuring cost efficiency, operational reliability, and a reduced carbon footprint.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of FY25, Bestway Cement’s working capital requirements, measured by the net cash cycle (net working capital days), improved to 16 days from 17 days in FY24, indicating slightly better efficiency in managing inventory, receivables, and payables. Trade payable days remained unchanged at 11 days. The Company funds its working capital through a mix of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings (STBs), with the quantum of STBs rising to PKR 19.23 billion in FY25 from PKR 12.8 billion in the previous year. The increase in STBs reflects higher reliance on external financing, likely driven by elevated input costs or working capital needs despite operational efficiency gains. The current ratio declined to 1.1x in FY25 from 1.6x in FY24, suggesting tighter liquidity buffers, which, if prolonged, may exert pressure on financial flexibility.


Coverages

As of FY25, EBITDA surged to PKR 38.7 billion from PKR 34.9 billion in FY24, reflecting a significant improvement in operational profitability. FCFOs stood at PKR 27.5 billion (FY24: PKR 29.7 billion), with the decline primarily attributable to higher tax outflows during the year. Consequently, the interest coverage ratio improved to 5.1x from 3.1x in FY24, indicating a stronger ability to meet financial obligations despite reduced operating cash flows.


Capitalization

During FY25, total borrowings and current maturity of long-term debt (CMLTD) stood at PKR 58 billion and PKR 9 billion, respectively, compared to PKR 62 billion and PKR 8.7 billion in FY24. The commencement of new projects, coupled with repayment of long-term debt, reduced the debt-to-equity ratio to 31.2% from 49.7% in FY24, reflecting a stronger capital structure. The Company’s equity base expanded significantly to PKR 128 billion in FY25 (FY24: PKR 63 billion), driven by retained earnings, thereby enhancing its ability to absorb economic shocks and sustain financial stability over the medium term.


 
 

Sep-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 197,605 120,831 122,976
2. Investments 4,268 226 5,109
3. Related Party Exposure 44,684 20,025 16,066
4. Current Assets 28,934 26,827 30,989
a. Inventories 7,113 5,647 7,307
b. Trade Receivables 1,308 1,971 1,211
5. Total Assets 275,491 167,909 175,140
6. Current Liabilities 27,313 16,640 14,828
a. Trade Payables 3,494 3,041 3,381
7. Borrowings 58,066 62,339 76,084
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 61,879 25,871 22,383
10. Net Assets 128,234 63,060 61,846
11. Shareholders' Equity 128,234 63,060 61,846
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 107,759 103,922 87,742
a. Cost of Good Sold (70,480) (71,695) (60,426)
2. Gross Profit 37,278 32,227 27,316
a. Operating Expenses (3,675) (2,856) (1,984)
3. Operating Profit 33,603 29,372 25,332
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 10,472 4,218 4,094
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 44,076 33,590 29,426
a. Total Finance Cost (7,625) (11,212) (6,828)
b. Taxation (12,586) (8,609) (10,707)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 23,864 13,769 11,892
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 27,519 29,670 22,472
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 17,618 18,348 16,401
c. Changes in Working Capital 7,836 6,051 (6,101)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 25,454 24,399 10,299
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (6,650) 4,214 (32,566)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (21,653) (19,919) 13,174
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (2,849) 8,694 (9,092)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 3.7% 18.4% 21.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 34.6% 31.0% 31.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 22.1% 13.2% 13.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 32.8% 34.4% 18.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 23.1% 21.4% 21.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 27 28 29
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 16 17 13
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.1 1.6 2.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.1 3.1 4.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 1.3 1.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.8 2.8 3.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 31.2% 49.7% 55.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.0% 17.3% 10.9%

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-25

www.pacra.com