Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Sep-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
20-Sep-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Sep-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Sep-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Sep-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited, incorporated in 1991 as a public limited company, has an intact business profile and is engaged in the production of greige fabric and operates with a weaving unit comprising 382 looms. The majority stakes (87.49%) of the Company are held by Nagina Group, through group companies and sponsoring individuals. The Company's board comprises ten members. Mr. Shahzada Ellahi Shaikh is the Chairman of the Board. The management team is headed by the CEO, Mr. Raza Ellahi Shaikh, who is well-versed in the textile business, providing the requisite acumen.

Rating Rationale

The assigned rating of Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited (“PWML” or “the Company”) emanates from the prominent profile of the Nagina Group (“the Group”), one of the oldest medium-sized textile clusters in Pakistan. The Group includes six private limited companies and three publicly listed companies, including the spinning sector’s Nagina Cotton Mills Limited (NCML) and Ellcot Spinning Mills Limited (ESML), as well as PWML in the weaving sector. PWML’s ratings reflect sustained profitability and business profile over the years. The Company is engaged in the production and sale of greige fabric and operates with a weaving unit of 382 air jet looms, achieving a capacity utilization of 97.5% and a production capacity of 91.1mln meters. PWML consumed PKR 13bln worth of yarn sourced from other group entities, namely NCML and ESML. The Company has a total energy requirement of 6.4 MW, which is met through a mix of 63% gas, 28% furnace oil, 5% LESCO, and 4% solar power. Given the recent imposition of an additional government gas levy, which will lead to higher energy costs, the Company has shifted towards alternative energy sources such as WAPDA and furnace oil to ensure operational efficiency. Moreover, PWML is in the process of upgrading its compressor under the BMR project worth 400mln, providing additional energy cost savings. The Textile sector continues to face significant challenges due to slowdowns in both the local and international markets. The contemporary imposition of tariffs by the USA has further contributed to the rise of universal market uncertainty. During 9MFY25, the topline of the Company stood at PKR 14.2bln (FY24: 18.7bln, 9MFY24: PKR 14.0bln), reflecting a modest YoY growth of 1.2%. The sales mix is oriented towards local sales with a 70% contribution, while the remaining 30% is generated from the exports segment. The business sustainability takes comfort from the Company’s association with stable entities as their top clientage. The net margins improved with a bottom line of PKR 104mln (FY24: PKR 87mln, 9MFY24: PKR 38mln), rationalized through a refined cost structure and diminished finance costs. The financial risk matrix of the Company remains moderate, with working capital structure, fulfilling its requirements through a combination of short-term borrowings and internally generated cash flows. Despite a decline in cash flows, coverage ratios remain stable owing to reduced finance costs. The Company maintained a leveraged Capital structure (54.3%), consisting of 34.5% short-term borrowings.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the sustained market position of the Company. Moreover, the company’s ability to generate enough cash flows to fulfill its financial obligations is critical, along with prudent investment decisions. The equity base of the Company is satisfactory and should be beefed up, going forward.

Profile
Legal Structure

Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited ('PWML' or 'the Company') was incorporated on November 20, 1991, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (repealed with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2017) as a public limited company.


Background

PWML has been associated with the Nagina Group ("the Group") since its inception. The Group was founded by Mr. Enam Shaikh Ellahi (late) with the establishment of Nagina Cotton Mills Limited (NCML) in 1967. It has a presence in the spinning sector through Ellcot Spinning Mills Limited and NCML. The registered office of PWML is located at Nagina House, 91-B-1, M.M. Alam Road, Gulberg-III, Lahore.


Operations

The principal activity of the Company is the manufacturing and sale of woven cloth. PWML operates with 382 air jet looms and has installed Benninger Zell warping and sizing machines for producing home furnishing greige fabric. The Company has a total energy requirement of 6.4MW, which is met through a mix of 63% gas, 28% furnace oil, 5% LESCO and 4% solar power. The Company’s production facility is located in the vicinity of Sheikhupura.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority stake (87.49%) of the Company is held by Nagina Group, through the group companies (30.19%) and sponsoring individuals (57.30%). The remaining shareholding rests with the general public (0.68%) and financial institutions (11.84%).


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company remains unchanged, with considerable positions held by the Ellahi family. The Nagina Group has a structured line of succession, ensuring an equal distribution of shareholding among the Ellahi brothers and their family members. The third generation is already actively involved, serving in various capacities.


Business Acumen

The Ellahi family, operating under the Nagina Group for over five decades, has established a long-standing and successful track record in the textile sector. The Group, one of Pakistan's oldest medium-sized textile houses, demonstrates a deep understanding of industry dynamics and an ability to navigate various economic cycles, leading to significant expertise in spinning and weaving, and to successfully expand its capacity despite the competitive nature of the textile industry.


Financial Strength

Nagina Group comprises three listed public limited companies, namely, i) Ellcot Spinning Mills Limited, ii) Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited and iii) Nagina Cotton Mills Limited, and six private limited companies, i) Monell (Pvt.) Limited, ii) Icaro (Pvt.) Limited, iii) Haroon Omer (Pvt.) Limited, iv) Ellahi International (Pvt.) Limited, v) ARH (Pvt.) Limited and vi) Pacific Industries (Pvt.) Limited.


Governance
Board Structure

Prosperity Weaving's board comprises ten members out of which six are non-executive directors, one director carries the executive role, and three are independent directors. Mr. Shahzada Ellahi Shaikh is the Chairman.


Members’ Profile

The Company's leadership is anchored by Chairman Mr. Shahzada Ellahi Shaikh, who brings over 48 years of experience in the textile industry and holds a bachelor's degree in economics and international relations. This deep industry knowledge is complemented by the diverse skill sets of the other board members, who collectively provide a wealth of expertise and varied experience to guide the Company's strategic direction.


Board Effectiveness

Three committees: audit, executive, and human resource & remuneration, are in place to assist the board in relevant matters and ensure proper oversight. The board meetings are held quarteerly to discuss the current Company performance and updates on projected targets. The meeting minutes are documented properly. The Sponsors play an active role and provide guidance to the management in the Company's operations.


Financial Transparency

M/s. Yousuf Adil, Chartered Accountants, serve as the external auditors of the Company. The firm is listed in the A category on the State Bank of Pakistan's panel of auditors and has expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for FY24.


Management
Organizational Structure

The organizational structure of the Company is divided into various functional departments, namely: (i) marketing, (ii) finance, (iii) administration & HR, (iv) accounts and (v) commercial (fixed asset procurement). To ensure a streamlined supply chain, the procurement of raw materials is centralized at the group level, with a significant portion of yarn being sourced from within the group's network of companies.


Management Team

The management team is headed by the CEO, Mr. Raza Ellahi, who holds a graduate degree in Economics. He is well-versed in the textile business, providing the requisite acumen. He is supported by a team of seasoned professionals, including Mr. Syed Mohsin Gilani (FCA), company secretary & director finance, who has over three decades of financial management expertise; Mr. Shahid Rassal, the technical director, with more than 32 years of experience in mechanical engineering and operations; and Mr. Muhammad Atif Anwer, the director of marketing, who has 24 years in marketing and sales. Mr. Muhammad Tariq Sheikh, serving as the Company’s CFO, has been associated with the Company since 1999. The team's collective expertise provides a robust foundation that fortifies the Company's strategic vision and ensures sustained operational excellence.


Effectiveness

The management meetings are held daily with follow-up points to resolve or proactively address operational issues, if any, eventually ensuring a smooth flow of operations. The Company’s MIS can be classified into three categories based on the reporting periodicity – daily, weekly and monthly. The daily and weekly reports are generated for top management with the main focus on the production and liquidity position of the Company. Whereas, on a monthly basis, the Company’s P&L is presented and discussed in the meetings.


MIS

Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited has implemented Oracle Oracle-based ERP solution with five operational modules, including i) order management, ii) procurement, iii) inventory, iv) fixed assets and v) cash management. The Company is also equipped with a "Treasury Management System", bringing efficiency to treasury transactions. This software keeps records and provides various analytical reports about the Company’s export and import quantities, trade business with banks, outstanding forward contracts’ bookings and periodic exchange rates.


Control Environment

PWML is accredited with international certifications for compliance. The Company is following the latest Quality Assurance Standards for fabric production and trade. The certification includes ISO 9001:2008, Global Organic Textile Standards, and Organic Content Standard. In order to ensure better productivity and compliance with relevant certifications the plants are regularly inspected.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During MY25, approximately 24.4mln MT of cotton was produced globally, compared to about 24.2 million MT in MY24. Throughout the year, low cotton production was observed in India and Pakistan. However, this was partly offset by increases in cotton production in China, the United States, and Brazil by roughly 9.7%, 19.4%, and 15.7%, respectively. China remains the largest producer and consumer of cotton worldwide (MY21-25). Pakistan's cotton output declined by approximately 30.7%, due to reduced cultivation area and a surge in duty-free imports of cotton and yarn, which disrupted domestic markets. Conversely, cotton imports increased by around 234.0% YoY during the same period to satisfy domestic demand (FY24: roughly 70.0% YoY decline). Cotton arrivals for FY24-25 totaled to about 5.5mln bales. The target for cotton production in FY26 is set at approximately 10.2mln bales.  


The sector's rising dependence on imported cotton poses a supply-side risk. During the FY25 ended, imports accounted for approximately 35% of the cotton supply (~11% in FY24), adding about USD 1.27bln (USD 448mln in FY24) to the country's import bill. Textile exports reached USD 17.9bln in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7bln the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14bln, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8bln and the spinning segment at USD 0.7bln. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1mln square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% on YoY basis in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% on YoY basis), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (approximately 7.8% in FY24).  


In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, international cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases.  


While the sector continues to demonstrate resilience on the export front, the margin outlook for FY26 appears challenging. Upstream segments such as spinning face greater downside risk from raw material inflation, while vertically integrated composite units with stronger export linkages are better positioned to defend profitability. Overall, the sector hinges on the ability to secure a stable cotton supply chain and navigate upcoming fiscal adjustments. Without structural improvement in domestic cotton production, earnings volatility is likely to persist.


Relative Position

The Company's market position is significantly enhanced by its association with the Nagina Group, a well-established entity with a long history of operations in Pakistan's spinning and weaving sectors. On a standalone basis, the Company maintains one of the highest market shares in the local weaving industry. This leading position is supported by its robust operational capacity, which includes 382 air jet looms.


Revenues

During FY24, the Company’s revenues increased by 27.9% YoY to PKR 18,746mln (FY23: PKR 14,655mln), mainly attributable to improved pricing. As of end-Mar 9MFY25, the Company’s topline stood at PKR 14,230mln (9MFY24: PKR 14,028mln), reflecting a modest YoY growth of 1.2%. The sales mix remains skewed towards the local market, contributing 70%, while exports account for the remaining 30%.


Margins

During FY24, the gross margin decreased to 6.3% (FY23:7.5%), translating into lower operating margins of 3.3% (FY23: 4.0%). The finance cost increased by 26% to PKR 409 mln (FY23: PKR 326mln). Consequently, the net profit declined to PKR 87 mln (FY23: PKR 138mln). As of 9MFY25, the gross margin remained relatively stable at 6.5%, while the net margin improved to 0.7%, primarily due to a decline in finance cost to PKR 207mln.


Sustainability

The Company’s business strategy emphasizes maintaining an optimal balance between local and export sales, while actively pursuing cost-reduction opportunities to enhance value through sustainable profitability and stable market growth. Management remains focused on aligning financial performance with projected topline and profitability targets. Following the challenges encountered in FY25, profitability has improved, primarily driven by a reduction in finance cost, which has provided financial relief and strengthened the Company’s overall performance.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirement is a function of inventory and receivables, for which the Company relies on a mix of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings. At end-Mar25, the company’s reliance on STB declined to PKR 984mln (end-Jun23: PKR 1,024mln). The net working capital cycle decreased to 51 days (end-Jun24: 54 days) on the back of the decreased inventory days. The Company recorded a decrease in the trade assets, clocking in at PKR 2,975mln (end-Jun24: PKR 3,412mln). The room-to-borrow also decreased to PKR 1,612mln (end-Jun24: PKR 1,915mln).


Coverages

During FY24, the FCFO increased by 15% to stand at PKR 744mln (FY23: PKR 649mln). The total finance cost paid was increased to PKR 443mln (FY23: PKR 174mln), resulting in a decline in interest coverage to 1.5x (FY23: 3.0x). The debt payback capacity increased to 5.9 years (FY23: 5.7 years). During 9MFY25, the Company experienced a decline in FCFO, clocking in at PKR 510mln (9MFY24: PKR 609mln) due to increased taxation. Moreover, Lower finance costs paid (9MFY25: PKR 239mln, 9MFY24: PKR 363mln) led to an increase in interest coverage (9MFY24: 2.6x; 9MFY24: 2.1x).


Capitalization

At end-Mar25, the Company's leverage decreased to 54.3% (end-Jun24: 57.6%). The equity base largely remained intact at PKR 2,404mln (end-Jun24: PKR 2,329mln). Total borrowings have decreased to stand at PKR 2,857mln (end-  Jun24: PKR 3,167mln). ST borrowings constitute 34.5% of total borrowings.


 
 

Sep-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,080 3,196 3,360 2,529
2. Investments 92 74 190 216
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,539 3,922 3,420 3,483
a. Inventories 1,508 1,772 1,604 1,827
b. Trade Receivables 1,225 1,580 1,325 1,243
5. Total Assets 6,710 7,192 6,970 6,227
6. Current Liabilities 1,164 1,441 1,012 880
a. Trade Payables 348 435 292 216
7. Borrowings 2,857 3,167 3,574 3,045
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 285 255 350 286
10. Net Assets 2,404 2,329 2,034 2,016
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,404 2,329 2,034 2,016
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 14,230 18,746 14,655 12,861
a. Cost of Good Sold (13,303) (17,564) (13,562) (11,765)
2. Gross Profit 926 1,182 1,093 1,096
a. Operating Expenses (414) (565) (512) (348)
3. Operating Profit 512 617 580 748
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (73) (215) 3 (6)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 439 402 583 742
a. Total Finance Cost (207) (409) (239) (117)
b. Taxation (129) 94 (191) (275)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 104 87 153 350
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 510 744 649 802
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 271 301 475 700
c. Changes in Working Capital 111 (11) 209 (1,380)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 381 291 683 (681)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (88) 254 (1,055) (306)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 112 (462) 439 1,007
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 405 82 67 20
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 1.2% 27.9% 14.0% 57.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 6.5% 6.3% 7.5% 8.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.7% 0.5% 1.0% 2.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 4.4% 3.9% 5.9% -4.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.8% 4.0% 7.6% 18.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 59 61 75 90
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 51 54 68 85
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.0 2.7 3.4 4.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 4.1 2.6 4.0 10.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.0 0.9 1.2 2.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 4.4 5.9 5.7 2.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 54.3% 57.6% 63.7% 60.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 58.4 70.5 181.6 157.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.8% 10.2% 6.3% 3.9%

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-25

www.pacra.com