Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
08-Nov-25 B A4 Negative Maintain YES
08-Nov-24 B A4 Negative Downgrade YES
28-Jun-24 BB A4 Negative Maintain YES
29-Dec-23 BB A4 Negative Downgrade YES
25-Jul-23 BBB A3 Negative Downgrade YES
About the Entity

Pakistan Services Limited was established in 1958 and is quoted on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. It owns and operates Pearl Continental Hotels – the largest hotel chain in the country with 1,200+ rooms. Subsequent to the period ending March 24, Mr. Murtaza Hashwani resigned from the position of CEO, and Mr. Bastien Paul was appointed as the CEO by the board of directors. He has more than two decades of experience within the hospitality industry.

Rating Rationale

The hospitality sector, after enduring years of pandemic-induced disruptions, continues to recover gradually; however, the pace of normalization remains uneven. Elevated financial costs, inflationary pressures, and subdued foreign tourism have weighed on the sector’s profitability. Entities with high financial leverage remain particularly vulnerable due to persistent cash flow mismatches and elevated debt servicing burdens. Pakistan Services Limited (Hereinafter referred to as ‘PSL’ or the 'Company’), operating under the ‘Pearl Continental’ brand, has experienced a prolonged strain in aligning its operational cash flows with financial obligations. Despite possessing a sizable asset base, the Company continues to face challenges in meeting its debt commitments. To reduce its debt exposure, PSL had previously undertaken a divestment program of select non-core assets, through which a significant portion of its debt was repaid. Out of the total long-term facilities of PKR ~15.3bln, PSL has so far repaid PKR ~8.5bln in principal along with PKR ~10.4bln in interest, aggregating to PKR ~18.9bln. The current outstanding principal stands at PKR ~6.8bln, which includes a Sukuk instrument of PKR ~4.5bln. The Company’s non-current assets, valued at PKR ~55.5bln as of 9MFY25, continue to provide substantial coverage against its debt obligations. In light of ongoing liquidity constraints, PSL had engaged Bridge Factor as its financial advisor last year to lead a comprehensive debt restructuring plan. However, negotiations with lenders have not reached a conclusive stage, and the planned asset sales remain pending. Consequently, the Company’s debt position remains largely unchanged, and the overall recovery outlook continues to hinge on the successful execution of the restructuring strategy. During the year, a change in management was observed, coinciding with a shift in ownership structure. Subsequent to year-end FY25, and as per notices issued on the Pakistan Stock Exchange, AKD Group Holdings (Private) Limited, along with its subsidiary AKD Securities Limited, acquired a ~27.95% shareholding in the Company on July 14, 2025. The following day, July 15, 2025, Mr. Dawood Jan Mohammad acquired ~28% of the Company’s voting shares, while on October 14, 2025, Thatta Cement Company Limited also acquired a stake of ~28%. These transactions reflect a significant reconfiguration of the Company’s ownership landscape, and its impact on the governance cannot be determined at this stage. The Company has also filed for an extension for submission of its annual audited financial statements for FY25 till the end of November 2025. Operationally, the Company’s performance has exhibited improvement, supported by a recovery in occupancy rates and better average room tariffs. During 9MFY25, revenue grew by ~14.7% to PKR ~12.94bln, while profitability strengthened with a net profit of PKR ~929mln, compared to a full-year profit of PKR ~425mln in FY24. The performance uptick reflects partial recovery of the domestic hospitality market and effective cost rationalization measures.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, ratings will depend on the successful restructuring of the long-term debt and Sukuk, sufficient liquidity for timely repayment of obligations, and improved coverage. Additionally, resolving the material uncertainty regarding the Company's going concern status, as documented by external auditors, is considered important.

Profile
Legal Structure

Pakistan Services Limited (Hereinafter referred to as "PSL" or "the Company") is a Public Limited Company, quoted on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).


Background

The Company was established in 1958 by the Government of Pakistan and Pakistan International Airlines, initially operating four hotels in Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, and Peshawar. Managed by InterContinental Hotels & Resorts until 1985, the management was then taken over by Hashoo Group, which rebranded the hotels as Pearl Continental Hotels.


Operations

The Company is principally engaged in the hospitality business and owns and manages the six luxury hotels located in Karachi, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Bhurban, Muzaffarabad and PC Legacy Hunza. There are also other PC-branded hotels in locations like Gwadar, Malam Jabba, Skardu and Hyderabad. Collectively, these six hotels offer around ~1,200+ rooms.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

As of 9MFY25, Sponsors, directors, and CEO cumulatively hold ~1.07% directly and ~0.028% through associated Companies. Banks, DFIs, Insurance Companies, Mudarbas, and mutual funds cumulatively hold ~4.9%. Foreign Companies collectively hold ~30%, (each of these having less than ~10% and there exists no consortium between these Companies), hence, these foreign Companies cannot exercise control over PSL. The remaining ~35% shares are held by others, and ~29% by the general public. However, subsequent to year-end FY25, and as per notices issued on the Pakistan Stock Exchange, AKD Group Holdings (Private) Limited, along with its subsidiary AKD Securities Limited, acquired a ~27.95% shareholding in the Company on July 14, 2025. The following day, July 15, 2025, Mr. Dawood Jan Mohammad acquired ~28% of the Company’s voting shares, while on October 14, 2025, Thatta Cement Company Limited also acquired a stake of ~28%.


Stability

The ownership remained stable for a long time; however, subsequent to the year-end, FY25 share acquisitions have resulted in significant changes to the Company’s ownership structure. With a few shareholders now holding sizable stakes, the governance landscape may be influenced in different ways. The impact on corporate governance and control, along with decision-making dynamics, remains uncertain and is yet to be determined as developments continue to unfold. At the reporting date, free float was recorded at ~94.76%.


Business Acumen

Hashoo Group began its hospitality operations in 1978 with the opening of its first hotel. In 1981, the Group added a second property under the Holiday Inn brand, introducing international standards to its operations. Since then, Hashoo Group has expanded its presence through joint ventures and operational improvements. Its hospitality portfolio includes several well-known hotel brands in Pakistan, reflecting its responsiveness to changing market conditions. Over time, the Group has contributed to the development of the hospitality sector in the country. Following recent changes in the Company’s ownership, the entry of new shareholders with different business backgrounds and experience across the diversified sector marks an important transition phase. While the long-standing operational legacy of Hashoo Group remains integral, the involvement of new investors may influence future strategic direction and governance dynamics. The evolving shareholder structure will be pivotal in shaping the Company’s business approach and sustaining its competitive positioning within the hospitality landscape.


Financial Strength

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, PSL has faced persistent challenges in obtaining direct financial support from its sponsors. Despite the sponsors’ deemed strong financial standing, underpinned by diversified business interests across hospitality, oil and gas exploration, information technology, minerals, pharmaceuticals, real estate, and commodity trading, such strength has not translated into tangible financial assistance for PSL. Nevertheless, the Company has continued to steer through operational and financial constraints, maintaining business continuity. While the prevailing economic conditions and sector-specific pressures pose challenges, PSL remains focused on sustaining its operations and exploring potential sources of support within the sponsor network and beyond.


Governance
Board Structure

As of 9MFY25, PSL comprises ten members and remains compliant with the Code of Corporate Governance. The composition includes three Executive Directors, four Non-Executive Directors, and three Independent Directors, ensuring a balanced representation. Following the notable changes in the Company’s shareholding structure in July 2025, the implications for governance dynamics and board composition are gradually unfolding. The evolving ownership landscape is expected to shape the strategic oversight framework, with its full impact likely to become clearer over time.


Members’ Profile

As of 9MFY25, the Board of Directors (BoD) consists of seasoned professionals from the hospitality industry. Chairman Mr. Sadruddin Hashwani has over four decades of experience. Independent directors are industry experts, while executive directors bring in-depth knowledge. Non-executive directors offer independent perspectives for sound decision-making.


Board Effectiveness

The former board has four key committees, including: 1) Audit, 2) Human Resource, 3) Nomination, and 4) Risk Management, which align with the Corporate Governance Code. During 9MFY25, the Board held three meetings with adequate attendance. Meeting minutes are well-documented to ensure transparency and support the overall governance.


Financial Transparency

KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co., a QCR-rated firm in category "A" of the SBP, is the Company's external auditor. They issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ending June 30, 2024. However, the auditors drew attention to the existence of material uncertainty related to going concern which states that, as of FY24, the Company's current liabilities exceed its current assets by PKR ~10.11bn. Auditors also mentioned about the breaches in long-term borrowing agreements and non-compliance with some covenants. However, Audit of FY25 is in progress and Company has been granted extension in holding its annual general meeting till end of November 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

PSL operates under a structured organizational framework intended to support its business operations and governance practices. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) leads the organization and is responsible for guiding its strategic direction and overseeing overall performance. Key functional departments—including Finance, Operations, Human Resources, Marketing, and Information Technology—are each headed by a designated leader who reports directly to the CEO. This reporting structure facilitates coordination and supports the implementation of Company-wide initiatives. Leadership and operational roles are currently staffed, contributing to continuity in management. The organizational setup enables PSL to address market conditions, regulatory obligations, and stakeholder needs. This framework reflects the Company’s approach to maintaining operational consistency and governance standards.


Management Team

PSL has recently undergone a key leadership transition with the appointment of Mr. Bastien Paul Emile Blanc as Chief Executive Officer. Bringing over 20 years of global experience in the hospitality industry, Mr. Bastien Paul Emile Blanc succeeds Mr. Murtaza Hashwani, and is supported by a highly qualified executive team committed to driving operational excellence and strategic growth. In April 2025, the Company also appointed Mr. Mujtaba Hussain as Chief Financial Officer, succeeding Mr. Tahir Mahmood. Mr. Mujtaba Hussain brings  ~27 years of professional experience, having worked across both local and multinational organizations in Pakistan and abroad.


Effectiveness

To enhance managerial effectiveness, PSL would benefit from the establishment of specialized management committees focused on key operational and strategic areas. These committees can play a pivotal role in strengthening oversight, improving coordination, and ensuring timely execution of day-to-day functions. Currently, the management faces challenges in implementing strategic plans and consistently meeting performance targets, which highlights the need for more accurate forecasting, proactive planning, and cross-functional collaboration. By adopting structured decision-making processes and instituting comprehensive performance monitoring frameworks, PSL can improve accountability, streamline operations, and align departmental efforts with corporate objectives. These measures would not only support better resource allocation and risk management but also empower leadership to respond more effectively to market dynamics and operational pressures, ultimately driving sustainable growth and organizational resilience.


MIS

PSL has adopted an integrated, cloud-based management system tailored specifically for the hospitality sector. This advanced platform enhances operational efficiency, streamlines service delivery, and supports real-time decision-making across its hotel portfolio. By leveraging cloud technology, PSL ensures scalability, data security, and improved coordination among departments, reinforcing its commitment to innovation and service excellence.


Control Environment

PSL has established a well-structured and independent Internal Audit Department that plays a vital role in strengthening the Company’s governance, risk management, and internal control environment. Reporting directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the department ensures transparency, accountability, and alignment with best practices. It operates across three core dimensions: 1) Assurance, 2) Consulting, and 3) Investigation. In its Assurance role, the department evaluates the effectiveness of internal controls, risk management systems, and compliance with regulatory requirements. Through its Consulting function, it advises management on process improvements, internal control enhancements, and operational efficiency. The Investigative role involves conducting special audits and forensic reviews in response to suspected irregularities or non-compliance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s robust services sector remains the largest contributor to the national GDP. As of the third quarter of FY25, it demonstrated a positive growth of ~3.99% and accounts for an estimated ~57.7% of the GDP for FY24, significantly surpassing the combined size of agriculture and industry. Within this sector, the hotel and restaurant industry plays a pivotal role, directly contributing to GDP and closely linked to the performance of the tourism sector, which is undergoing a notable resurgence. This upward trend in tourism is driven by a combination of factors, including increased domestic and international travel, enhanced infrastructure, and supportive government policies—most notably the relaxation of visa requirements for 126 countries. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC), the tourism sector’s contribution to GDP is projected to reach ~6.1% (PKR 5.91 trillion) in 2024, up from ~5.8% in 2023. The sector is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~6.56% between 2025 and 2030. Revenue is expected to rise from USD 1.74bn in 2025 to USD 3.02bn by 2030, reflecting a CAGR of ~11.66%. This growth is supported by a broad spectrum of tourism segments, including religious, leisure, and business travel, as well as the emerging Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, and Exhibitions (MICE) market. Digital transformation is reshaping the industry, with online platforms projected to account for ~74% of hotel revenue by 2030. Urban centers such as Lahore, Karachi, and Islamabad are witnessing increased investment in mid- and upper-scale hotel infrastructure. The competitive landscape remains moderately concentrated, with innovation in smart hotel technologies and personalized services emerging as key differentiators. In response to growing demand, Pakistan’s hotel industry is experiencing a period of transformation. Leading hospitality brands such as Pearl Continental, Serena, Nishat, and Avari are strategically expanding into budget and mid-scale segments through sub-brands like Hotel One and AvariXpress. This diversification, coupled with the entry of new domestic and international players, is intensifying competition across all market tiers.  Despite challenges such as infrastructure limitations and seasonal demand fluctuations, the sector presents significant opportunities—particularly in religious tourism, eco-tourism in northern regions, and the development of digital-first hospitality experiences.


Relative Position

PSL operates within Pakistan’s hospitality industry through its ownership and management of the Pearl Continental (PC) Hotels chain. With properties located in major urban centers and tourist destinations, the Company maintains a presence in the upscale and luxury hotel segment. The Pearl Continental brand is recognized in the market and competes alongside other established names such as Serena Hotels, Marriott, Avari, and Hilton. PSL’s geographic footprint and service model reflect its focus on meeting the expectations of high-end clientele. The Company continues to invest in infrastructure, technology, and service delivery as part of its broader operational strategy.


Revenues

The Company derives its revenue from four primary sources: rooms (the largest contributor), food and beverage, other related services, and shop license fees. During 9MFY25, the Company achieved a revenue growth of ~15% on year-on-year basis, reaching PKR ~12,945mln, compared to PKR ~15,045mln in FY24. This growth is primarily driven by a notable improvement in operational metrics, including a rise in average occupancy rates from ~57% in FY24 to approximately ~55% in 9MFY25. Additionally, higher average daily room rates and a broader market recovery contributed to the positive financial performance.


Margins

During 9MFY25, PSL reported a notable improvement in profitability. The Company’s gross margin increased to ~46.2%, up from ~39.4% in FY24. This enhancement is primarily attributed to higher average daily room rates (ADR) and more efficient operational management. PSL also achieved a significant rise in net profit, recording PKR ~992mln in 9MFY25 compared to PKR ~425mln in FY24. This notable improvement in profitability is primarily attributable to a surge in sales volumes and a reduction in finance costs during the review period. The results reflect heightened market demand and improved occupancy rates across the Company’s hotel portfolio, underscoring PSL’s strengthened operational performance and strategic market positioning.


Sustainability

Over the past two years, PSL faced significant challenges in meeting its debt obligations, despite maintaining a substantial asset base. In response, the Company undertook a strategic initiative to stabilize its financial position by divesting non-core assets. This approach enabled PSL to retire a considerable portion of its outstanding debt and accrued interest. From a total long-term facility of PKR 15.3bn, the Company has successfully repaid PKR 18.6bn in principal and interest to date. As of 9MFY25 PSL reported a book value of non-current assets at PKR 57bn, offering multiple times coverage against its remaining liabilities. Recognizing a persistent mismatch between cash inflows and debt servicing requirements, management launched a two-phase debt restructuring plan. The initial phase encountered several challenges, particularly in liquidating designated assets to generate the necessary cash flows. Given the complexity of the restructuring process, PSL has appointed Elixir Securities as its financial advisor. The Company is currently engaged in discussions with its banking partners, aiming to reach an amicable resolution within the current quarter.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 9MFY25, the Company successfully maintained a strong position in its working capital management, achieving a negative net working capital cycle of -8 days, compared to -12 days in FY24. This performance reflects the Company’s continued focus on operational efficiency and liquidity optimization. The successful execution of initiatives aimed at enhancing cash flows remains critical to addressing the asset-liability mismatch and ensuring long-term financial stability.


Coverages

During 9MFY25, the Company generated free cash flows from operations amounting to PKR 3,338mln, compared to PKR 3,446mln in FY24. While slightly lower year-over-year, the Company demonstrated improved financial efficiency, as reflected in its interest coverage ratio, which rose to ~2.8x in 9MFY25 from ~1.5x in FY24. This improvement indicates enhanced capacity to meet interest obligations, driven by stronger operational cash flows and better cost management.


Capitalization

The Company's debt book primarily consists of short-term borrowings, amounting to PKR ~10,068mln as of 9MFY25. This shift is due to the reclassification of long-term borrowings to the current portion in FY24 following restructuring arrangements. The Company’s proposal to restructure its long-term loan and Sukuk facilities is currently under review. While preliminary approval has been granted based on mutually agreed terms, the process has experienced delays due to ongoing internal approval procedures among the lending institutions. The Company continues to engage with all relevant stakeholders and expects to receive the final term sheets upon completion of the remaining formalities. Total borrowings during 9MFY25 were PKR ~10,382mln, compared to PKR ~10,388mln in FY24. The gearing ratio for 9MFY25 was recorded at ~18.3% from ~19% in FY24, indicating a modest reduction in financial leverage.


 
 

Nov-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 56,851 56,012 47,853 51,090
2. Investments 811 1,485 1,216 1,833
3. Related Party Exposure 1,556 1,627 1,770 2,913
4. Current Assets 3,811 3,145 13,902 10,224
a. Inventories 370 289 306 147
b. Trade Receivables 1,089 880 940 781
5. Total Assets 63,029 62,269 64,742 66,060
6. Current Liabilities 4,437 4,545 4,566 4,105
a. Trade Payables 1,704 1,675 1,712 1,042
7. Borrowings 10,382 10,388 14,053 15,887
8. Related Party Exposure 94 135 65 24
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,229 1,306 1,119 890
10. Net Assets 46,887 45,895 44,939 45,154
11. Shareholders' Equity 46,887 45,895 44,939 45,154
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,945 15,045 13,262 11,988
a. Cost of Good Sold (6,970) (9,122) (8,235) (7,026)
2. Gross Profit 5,975 5,923 5,027 4,962
a. Operating Expenses (3,202) (4,080) (3,850) (2,899)
3. Operating Profit 2,773 1,843 1,177 2,064
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 127 1,190 816 (58)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,900 3,033 1,992 2,005
a. Total Finance Cost (1,344) (2,464) (1,925) (1,378)
b. Taxation (564) (144) (286) (18)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 992 425 (218) 609
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,338 3,446 2,047 3,072
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,632 133 (397) 877
c. Changes in Working Capital (417) 256 494 (90)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,215 389 97 786
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (926) 3,045 1,756 427
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (351) (3,584) (1,243) (707)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 939 (150) 610 507
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 14.7% 13.4% 10.6% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 46.2% 39.4% 37.9% 41.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 7.7% 2.8% -1.6% 5.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 22.6% 24.6% 19.2% 24.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.9% 0.9% -0.5% 1.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 28 29 30 28
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -8 -12 -8 -3
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 0.7 3.0 2.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.1 1.5 1.5 2.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.7 8.8 43.8 7.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 18.3% 18.7% 23.9% 26.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 15.3% 17.1% 11.8% 7.3%

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-25

www.pacra.com