Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
30-May-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
31-May-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

H. Sadar Ali Akhtar Ali (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in Pakistan on 11th August 1985, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (Now Companies Act, 2017). The Company's shareholding has predominantly transitioned to the third generation, ensuring continuity in ownership while capitalizing on deep industry expertise and a long-term strategic vision. Mr. Mian Naeem Akhtar is the CEO of the Company, and his brother Mr. Mian Saleem Akhtar is the Director, both have decades of professional experience. Mr. Ahsan Ali, Mr. Mohsin Ali, and Mr. Hassan Ali (Directors and sons of Mr. Naeem) are actively involved in the business they are well-qualified with ample industry and business experience.

Rating Rationale

The ratings incorporate the robust business profile of H. Sadar Ali Akhtar Ali (Pvt.) Limited (hereafter referred to as "HSA" or the Company) represented by its esteemed legacy of excellence and innovation in the leather industry. HSA is a leading manufacturer and exporter of premium-quality leather, offering a diverse range of finished products. With expertise in burnished, waxed, pull-up, oily, and nubuck leather, the Company ensures exceptional materials tailored for various applications. HSA has also expanded into high-end leather goods, including jackets and gloves, further enhancing its product offerings. HSA has strategically expanded its product portfolio by diversifying into the rapidly growing denim segment, reinforcing its position in the industry and capitalizing on emerging market opportunities. HSA proactively targets major leather export markets, including China, Spain, Vietnam, Cambodia, France, and Singapore. For denim exports, the primary destinations include European countries and United Kingdom. The founding family, with decades of expertise, upholds the Company's leadership and legacy in leather. Pakistan's leather industry is segmented into five major categories by value, with leather gloves accounting for ~35%, followed by apparel and clothing at ~30%, and tanned leather contributing ~17%. Overall, the performance of the leather sector in terms of value declined by ~9% in FY24 and was recorded at USD 808.4mln (FY23: USD 887mln). The growth is restricted due to multifaceted challenges, such as a lack of technological advancements, availability of skilled labor, and cheaper-priced alternatives. However, a growing global population, rising fashion trends, and favorable exchange rates for exports offer opportunities. The Company's governance framework can be enhanced through the establishment of a structured board and specialized committees with strengthening independent oversight function. Additionally, a robust internal audit function reinforces accountability and optimizes operational efficiency. During 9MFY25, the Company’s topline increased by ~10% on annualized basis due to slight improvement in price and volumes . However, margins recorded some dilution at all levels due to elevated cost pressure at different levels. The financial risk profile of the company is considered adequate with the comfortable coverages, cashflows, and working capital cycle. The capital structure is moderately leveraged, and the borrowings are mainly comprised of short-term on SBP’s concessionary rates for working capital requirements.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on HSA's ability to maintain its position in its specific business niches and sustain growth in the face of challenging industry dynamics. Essential factors include bolstering share capital, achieving consistent revenue growth, enhancing margins, and maintaining prudent financial performance in accordance with projections.

Profile
Legal Structure

H. Sadar Ali Akhtar Ali Pvt. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as ‘HSA’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in Pakistan on 11th August 1985, under the repealed Companies Ordinance 1984 (Now Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located at 14- G.T Road, Hide Market, Lahore, the tannery is located at Mauza Halloki, Lahore. The Company has another manufacturing unit located at Niaz Nagar Kasur and a branch office located at Din Garh Kasur.


Background

Founded in 1941 as a family-run leather business, HSA has steadily evolved over the decades into a cutting-edge leather processing and production facility. Through continuous innovation and dedication to quality, the Company has established itself as one of the leading manufacturers and exporters of finished leather in the country. Today, HSA is recognized for its expertise in leather craftsmanship, its commitment to sustainable production practices, and its strong global presence in the leather industry.


Operations

The principal activity of the Company is to manufacture and sell tanned, finished leather, leather products, and ready-made garments. The Company manufactures all types of finished leather such as Cow, Sheep, Goat, and Buffalo. HSA has another division of Denim which was established in 2017 and it is an exportoriented unit. There are ~450 machines installed in factory and all jeggings including of ladies, gents, and kids are manufactured and exported.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

H. Sadar Ali Akhtar Ali Pvt. Ltd. is a family-owned Company with ownership distributed among family members. The CEO, Mr. Mian Naeem Akhtar, holds a direct stake of ~3.0%. While his sons, Mian Ahsan Ali, Mian Mohsin Ali, and Mian Hassan Ali, respectively hold stakes of ~26%, ~25%, and ~25%. Additionally, Mr. Mian Saleem Akhtar (Director), who is the brother of the CEO, owns ~ 21% of the Company's shares.


Stability

HSA has distinguished itself as an industry leader by fostering an ethical and responsible corporate culture. With a strong commitment to innovation, the Company continuously enhances the quality and diversity of its leather products, ensuring excellence in craftsmanship while meeting global standards. This dedication not only strengthens HSA’s stability but also reinforces its long-term growth and market presence. A key factor in its success is the Company’s unwavering adherence to sustainability and responsible production practices. This commitment has earned HSA a prestigious Gold rating certification from the globally recognized Leather Working Group (LWG)—a testament to its leadership in environmental stewardship and ethical business operations. Through these initiatives, HSA continues to solidify its position as a trusted name in the leather export market, shaping the industry’s future with integrity, innovation, and sustainability at its core.


Business Acumen


With decades of industry expertise, HSA's sponsors brings a deep understanding of business dynamics, guiding the Company toward sustained success. Over the years, HSA has strategically expanded its operations beyond traditional leather manufacturing, diversifying its revenue streams through value-added segments. At present, the Company stands as a key player in the production of premium leather jackets, denim garments, and twill garments, catering to evolving market demands and fashion trends. This diversification not only strengthens HSA’s market presence but also enhances its ability to serve a broader customer base, reinforcing its position as a leading name in the leather and textile industry.



Financial Strength

HSA maintains a strong financial profile, underpinned by a substantial equity base, reflecting the Company’s resilience and long-term stability. This robust financial foundation not only enables sustainable growth but also underscores the sponsors’ capacity to provide support whenever required. With prudent financial management and a well-capitalized structure, HSA remains well-positioned to navigate market fluctuations and seize new opportunities, reinforcing its standing as a reliable and forward-thinking industry leader.


Governance
Board Structure

Board of Directors consists of five members, including Mr. Mian Naeem Akhtar, who serves as the CEO. Currently, the board is entirely composed of members from the sponsoring family, with no independent directors. While this structure fosters strong family leadership and continuity, it also highlights opportunities for further improvement by incorporating independent directors. Introducing independent board members could enhance governance, bring diverse perspectives, and strengthen strategic decision-making, further reinforcing the Company's commitment to transparency and sustainable growth in the industry.


Members’ Profile

HSA benefits from the extensive experience of its leadership, with Mr. Mian Naeem Akhtar, the CEO, bringing over five decades of expertise in the leather industry. Similarly, Mr. Mian Saleem Akhtar, serving as Director, has accumulated more than four decades of industry knowledge. Both leaders have been deeply involved in the Company since the time of their ancestors, ensuring continuity and a strong foundation built on tradition and craftsmanship. The board as a whole possesses vast experience in tannery operations, with a solid understanding of market dynamics and production techniques. Additionally, diversity in expertise within the board adds further value, allowing the Company to adapt to evolving industry trends and maintain its position as a leader in leather manufacturing.


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors meets quarterly, adhering to regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and strategic oversight. These regular meetings foster full attendance, strengthening board engagement and effectiveness in decision-making. Additionally, detailed minutes are meticulously recorded, preserving transparency and accountability in governance. While existing practices reflect a commitment to corporate oversight, there remains room for further enhancement to optimize operational efficiency and governance standards.



Financial Transparency

M/S. Muniff Ziauddin & Co. is the external auditor of the Company. Auditors are QCR rated also appears on the SBP panel in A category. The auditors have expressed an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30th, 2024.  The Company has taken a proactive approach to ensuring financial integrity by establishing an Internal Audit Department. This department plays a critical role in overseeing and evaluating financial controls, identifying risks, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. By conducting independent assessments and providing recommendations, the Internal Audit Department strengthens accountability, enhances operational efficiency, and safeguards the organization's financial health.


Management
Organizational Structure

A well-designed organizational structure exists in the Company. In the first tier, operations are segregated into 7 broad departments: (i) Leather Wing, (ii) Accounts & Taxation, (iii) HR, (iv) MIS & IT, (v) Internal Audit, (vi) Administration, and (vii) HSA Apparel (Denim). Clear lines of responsibility are defined for each department.


Management Team

Overall management control is in the hands of board of directors. Mr. Wajih ud din, serving as CFO, brings over 36 years of seasoned expertise to the role. Mr. Ahsan oversees finance and denim operations, Mr. Mohsin manages the technical aspects of leather production, and Mr. Hassan is responsible for the Company's marketing endeavors.


Effectiveness

With the support of a highly qualified and experienced team of professionals, HSA is continuously strengthening its core capabilities while expanding its footprint both within Pakistan and internationally. The Company's strategic approach to growth is driven by a clear and well-defined management framework, ensuring operational efficiency and alignment with its long-term goals. By leveraging its expertise and structured leadership, HSA remains committed to innovation, quality excellence, and market expansion, solidifying its reputation as a leading force in the leather and apparel industries.


MIS

Currently, the Company is using an ERP solution SHerp _ with version 17.12. Sherpa ERP is a cloud-based business management software built for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). Sherpa automates manual processes and brings customer, sales, inventory, and financial data into one platform


Control Environment

HSA embraces a balanced and environmentally friendly growth strategy, integrating sustainable development principles into all aspects of its operations. The Company is dedicated to minimizing environmental impact through responsible practices and innovative solutions. As part of its sustainability commitment, HSA has invested in an imported, state-of-the-art Waste Water Treatment Plant, ensuring efficient water management and pollution control. Additionally, the Company fully complies with ISO 45001:2018, an internationally recognized standard for occupational health and safety, demonstrating its commitment to both environmental responsibility and workplace safety. Through these initiatives, HSA continues to lead by example, fostering an eco-conscious business model that aligns with global sustainability efforts while strengthening its competitive edge in the industry.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Renowned for its exceptional craftsmanship and strict adherence to quality standards, Pakistan's leather goods are highly sought after both domestically and internationally. The industry's recent growth trajectory showcases its resilience and adaptability, even amidst economic challenges. Investments in advanced manufacturing techniques and sustainable practices have significantly enhanced production efficiency. The sector has also benefited from substantial investments in state-of-the-art equipment and technology. As Pakistan continues to prioritize this vital sector, it is well-positioned to solidify its status as a leading player in the global leather market. Ongoing efforts to expand market reach, diversify product offerings, and maintain stringent quality controls will contribute to sustained growth and success. Pakistan's leather industry is segregated into 5 major divisions including: i). Tanned Leather, ii). Apparel & clothing, iii). Gloves, iv). Footwear and v). other products. In terms of sector share, apparel & clothing of leather contributed (~31%) in total export market, accompanied by leather gloves (~35%), tanned leather (~17%), all three aggregating to ~82.82%. Leather footware (~15%) in FY24 having huge potential arising due to Trade war between USA & China & having GSP status for Europe has also stuck in low growth zone due to incompetent policies of government. Aggregating all sectors, the overall performance of the Leather Sector in terms of exports declined by ~9.01% compared to the previous year, indicating a concerning trend.



Relative Position

HSA has firmly established itself as one of the largest leather exporters in Pakistan, maintaining its market leadership through consistent revenue growth at an accelerating pace. With a commitment to innovation and expansion, the Company has successfully broadened its horizons, strategically venturing into new business areas over the years. This diversification, coupled with HSA’s focus on quality, sustainability, and operational excellence, has reinforced its position as a trusted name in the leather industry—both domestically and internationally.


Revenues

During 9MFY25, HSA recorded a topline of PKR 6,789mln, reflecting an year-over-year (YoY) growth of ~10%, compared to PKR 8,223mln in FY24. This sustained growth highlights the Company’s expanding market presence and strong revenue trajectory. A significant ~85% of total revenue is derived from export sales, underscoring HSA’s global footprint in the leather industry. Additionally, ~15% of total sales come from the local market, which is also considered indirect exports, further strengthening the Company’s contribution to international trade.


Margins

During 9MFY25, the Company experienced a decline in profitability. The gross margin fell to ~18%, compared to ~22% in FY24, indicating higher production costs and pricing pressures. The operating profit margin also narrowed to around ~5.3%, down from ~8.2% in FY24, reflecting increased operational expenses and lower revenue growth. Additionally, the net profit margin stood at ~2.7% in 9MFY25, slightly lower than ~3.0% in FY24, suggesting reduced overall profitability due to increased taxes in period under review .



Sustainability

HSA's management is committed to establishing a strong and sustainable presence in both local and international markets by investing in cutting-edge technology and advanced machinery. These strategic enhancements aim to optimize production lines, improve efficiency, and elevate product quality, reinforcing the Company's competitive edge. As part of its sustainability initiatives, HSA has planned to install a solar power project with a capacity of 1100 KWT, designed to generate sufficient renewable energy to meet the entire manufacturing facility’s needs. This eco-friendly investment aligns with the Company’s vision of reducing its carbon footprint while ensuring long-term operational sustainability. Additionally, the management conducts periodic reviews of business performance, utilizing projections and forecasts to make informed strategic decisions. This proactive approach enables HSA to navigate market challenges, capitalize on growth opportunities, and maintain its position as a leading industry player.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 9MFY25, HSA’s gross working capital days reached ~155 days, compared to ~167 days in FY24. This slight decrease reflects stabilized working capital utilization over the period. The Company's average inventory days have remained relatively consistent over the last three years, fluctuating between ~120 to ~134 days, indicating steady inventory turnover and management practices. Meanwhile, average receivable days reached ~31days in 9MFY25, a marginal decrease from ~33 days in FY24, highlighting efficient receivables collection. However, the net working capital cycle increased to ~89 days in 9MFY25, up from ~74 days in FY24. Despite this increase, HSA maintains a structured approach to working capital management, ensuring financial stability and liquidity optimization.


Coverages

During 9MFY25, HSA generated free cash flows from operations (FCFO) of  PKR ~264mln, compared to PKR ~769mln in FY24. The decline reflects fluctuations in operational cash generation, influenced by market conditions and lower profitability in review period. The interest coverage ratio stood at ~3.9x in 9MFY25, lower than ~5.6x in FY24. Meanwhile, the core-debt coverage ratio improved significantly to 1.4x in 9MFY25, up from 0.2x in FY24, reflecting an enhanced ability to service core debt. These financial metrics highlight HSA’s commitment to maintaining liquidity and debt management efficiency, ensuring sustainable financial operations.


Capitalization

In 9MFY25, HSA maintained a moderate leveraged capital structure, with a leveraging ratio of ~32%, compared to ~26% in FY24. Over the past three years, the Company's leverage levels have remained relatively stable, reflecting a balanced approach to debt utilization. A significant portion of the Company's debt ~84% as of 9MFY25 (compared to ~92% in FY24)—consists of short-term borrowings, reinforcing HSA’s reliance on flexible financing for operational needs. Additionally, the Company has secured both long-term debt and short-term borrowings at concessionary rates under the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) schemes, optimizing its financial costs and supporting liquidity management.


 
 

May-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,158 2,990 3,144 2,499
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 42 89 94 94
4. Current Assets 5,470 6,051 5,269 3,826
a. Inventories 2,789 3,352 2,692 1,962
b. Trade Receivables 946 589 895 857
5. Total Assets 8,670 9,130 8,507 6,419
6. Current Liabilities 1,471 2,655 2,204 1,695
a. Trade Payables 1,028 2,238 1,947 1,505
7. Borrowings 2,261 1,677 1,691 1,201
8. Related Party Exposure 0 27 62 2
9. Non-Current Liabilities 67 85 74 58
10. Net Assets 4,871 4,687 4,476 3,464
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,871 4,687 4,476 3,464
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,789 8,223 7,091 5,590
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,568) (6,445) (5,752) (4,616)
2. Gross Profit 1,221 1,778 1,340 974
a. Operating Expenses (860) (1,102) (867) (709)
3. Operating Profit 361 676 473 265
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 10 (138) 1 43
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 371 538 473 309
a. Total Finance Cost (68) (200) (151) (87)
b. Taxation (119) (93) (71) (56)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 184 245 252 166
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 264 769 596 442
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 200 556 495 362
c. Changes in Working Capital (108) (543) (854) (529)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 92 13 (359) (167)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (183) (82) (44) (206)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 102 (70) 496 121
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 11 (138) 94 (252)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 10.1% 16.0% 26.9% 63.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 18.0% 21.6% 18.9% 17.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.7% 3.0% 3.5% 3.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 2.3% 2.7% -3.6% -1.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.1% 5.3% 6.3% 4.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 155 167 165 165
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 89 74 76 74
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.7 2.3 2.4 2.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 7.4 6.2 5.5 11.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 4.3 3.7 6.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.4 0.2 0.3 0.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 31.7% 26.3% 27.4% 25.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 13.2 58.5 133.8 46.8
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.9% 8.5% 8.3% 3.9%

May-25

www.pacra.com

May-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-25

www.pacra.com