Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Jun-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
27-Jun-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
27-Jun-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
30-Jun-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
01-Jul-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Saif Textile Mills Limited (STML) was incorporated in 1989. The Company is majority-owned by Saif Holdings, which holds a 49.58% stake. Other significant shareholders include NIT (5.80%), the State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (3.90%), while the remaining 40.72% constitutes the free float. The Board of Directors comprises eight members, including the Chairman, Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan. Mr. Rashid Ibrahim resigned from his position as an Independent Director effective May 19, 2025. Mr. Rana Muhammad Shafi replaced Mr. Sohail Hussain Hydari as a director on May 23, 2025. Furthermore, Mr. Sohail Hussain Hydari has tendered his resignation as CEO. Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan has assumed the role of CEO of Saif Textile Mills Limited, effective from May 15, 2025. Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan also serves as the CEO of Kohat Textile Mills Limited. Additionally, in January 2025, Mr. Muhammad Waseem Aslam replaced Mr. Luqman as CFO. Mr. Abid Hussain has joined as Executive Director, Finance & Operations, bringing diversified experience in the textile sector. The new management has sufficient experience and has shown historic progress/growth in other associated Company in the textile sector.

Rating Rationale

The rating of Saif Textile Mills Limited (“STML” or “the Company”) is underpinned by the profile of its sponsoring group, the Saif Group, a prominent industrial and services conglomerate in Pakistan. The group has a notable presence across diverse industry segments, including power, textiles, oil and gas exploration, real estate, information technology and communication, and healthcare. STML comprises three spinning units and a dying unit, each equipped with state-of-the-art machinery from Europe, Japan, and China. The Company manufactures and sells different types of yarn, including Accru yarn, Mélange yarn, Dyed yarn, and Surgical cotton. Accru yarn is the Company’s leading product, contributing approximately 90% of total sales, while the remaining 10% is generated from the other yarn types. The management of the Company is expected to drive future growth through export prioritization and improved overall capacity utilization. During 9MFY25, STML's topline declined to PKR 8.69bln (FY24: PKR 12.25bln; 9MFY24: PKR 9.56bln), primarily due to a slump in domestic yarn demand. This was driven by increased yarn imports under the EFS scheme, which constrained market liquidity for local spinners, alongside a downward trend in international cotton prices that led to lower yarn prices. Additionally, a rise in gas prices further strained margins, resulting in a reduction of gross margins to 11.2% (FY24: 14.6%). The Company recorded a net loss of PKR 367mln during 9MFY25; however, a gradual reduction in the policy rate, along with the management's strategic intent to diversify the product mix by shifting towards finer yarn counts (100s and above), is expected to cater to high-value niche segments and enhance profitability. Following the recent reduction in electricity prices, the Company has shifted a major portion of its energy consumption to electricity. To mitigate the impact of rising energy costs, STML is undertaking two key initiatives: (i) the installation of a solar power plant, and (ii) the installation of a boiler for in-house steam generation. As part of its commitment to sustainable and renewable energy solutions, the Company is currently in negotiations with lender banks for the financing of a 10MW solar power plant, with an estimated project cost of PKR 900mln. Further, the sponsor's support, totaling PKR 2.5bln in the form of long-term loans and short-term working lines, remains critical to the sustainability of the Company's financial risk profile. The Company continues to operate with a highly leveraged capital structure and constrained working capital. Strengthening its credit quality metrics is necessary to enable the Company to independently support its core operations and reduce dependence on sponsor funding.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the continuity of financial support from sponsors. While generating sufficient cash flows to support Company operations on a standalone basis, and maintaining the profitability matrix at an optimal level. The adherence to the debt matrix at an optimal level is a prerequisite for the assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Saif Textile Mills Limited ('STML' or 'The Company') was incorporated in 1989 as a Public Limited Company and is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).


Background

Saif Textile has been associated with the Saif Group since its inception. The Group has a presence in the spinning sector through Kohat Textile and Mediterranean Textile. The Company’s production facilities are located in the Gadoon Industrial Estate, KPK.


Operations

The Company engages in the manufacturing and marketing of diverse yarn varieties, including accrue yarn, mélange yarn, dyed yarn, and surgical cotton. It operates with a total of 105,744 ring spindles and 19 doubling machines, achieving an annual production capacity of 14.81 million kilograms. Additionally, the Company has a dyeing unit with a production capacity of 17 tonnes per day. At full capacity utilization, the company’s total energy requirement is 11 MW, sourced as follows: 8.5 MW from gas, 1.7 MW from the grid, and 0.8 MW from solar power.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Saif Group, via its holding entity Saif Holdings, maintains a controlling stake in Saif Textiles. This control is enabled through a 49.58% shareholding in the Company. Other significant shareholders include the State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan (3.90%), and NIT (5.80%), while the remaining 40.72% constitutes the free float.


Stability

The Group has established a holding Company structure with equitable shareholding among all Saif brothers, signifying a formalized and coherent succession framework. However, the transfer of ownership to the next generation has not yet been documented.


Business Acumen

The sponsors have maintained a presence in the local spinning industry for over five decades, during which they developed deep operational expertise. Although the Group’s expansion within the textile sector remained modest, it demonstrated resilience by sustaining operations through periods of significant volatility, particularly within the spinning segment. Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan is regarded as a key figure in driving strategic execution and delivering results at critical junctures.


Financial Strength

The Group is one of the prominent industrial and services conglomerates in Pakistan. It has a notable presence across diverse industry segments, including power, textiles, oil and gas exploration, real estate, information technology and communication, and healthcare, through seven subsidiaries and four associated companies. The Group’s strong financial position demonstrates its ability to support Saif Textile in times of need, as evidenced in the past.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of Saif Textile Mills Limited comprises eight members, including the Chairman, Mr. Javed Saifullah. The board includes six non-executive directors and two independent directors.. There have been two recent changes in the board composition. Mr. Rashid resigned as a director, and Mr. Khalid Siddiq Tirmizey was appointed as new independent director on May 22, 2025. Additionally, Mr. Rana Muhammad Shafi replaced Mr. Sohail Hussain Hydari as a director on May 23, 2025. The Company's board is dominated by sponsor family representatives. Most of the directors have been associated with the board for a reasonably long time.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan is the Chairman of the Company, succeeding Mr. Osman Saifullah Khan, who now serves as a Director. Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan holds an MBA from the University of Pittsburgh and brings over four decades of extensive experience to the role. Mr. Osman Saifullah Khan holds a Master's degree in Engineering and Management and has 28 years of broad experience. Ms. Hoor Yousafzai is a qualified Chartered Accountant and serves as a Director. She has been associated with Saif Textile Mills Limited for 18 years. The other board members possess substantial and diverse expertise.


Board Effectiveness

During FY24, the Company held six meetings of the Board of Directors. Board meetings have adequate attendance of directors. The board meeting minutes were appropriately recorded. Meanwhile, the overall strategy of the company is discussed in the bi-annual group meeting of Saif Group, whereas day-to day operations are discussed in board meetings. For effective oversight and compliance with the code of corporate governance, the board has formed two board committees namely i) Audit Committee and (ii) Human Resource & Remuneration Committee.


Financial Transparency

M/s ShineWing Hameed Chaudhri & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the external auditors of the Company. The firm is included in the SBP’s panel of auditors under Category 'B'. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 2024.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates with a lean organizational structure, wherein departmental heads report directly to the Executive Director of Finance and Operations, who in turn reports to both the CEO and the Board of Directors.


Management Team

On May 15, 2025, Mr. Sohail Hussain Hydari tendered his resignation from the position of CEO. The Board appointed Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan as the new CEO. He brings 18 years of experience in the textile industry and has been associated with the Company for 17 years. He is also currently serving as the CEO of Kohat Textile Mills Limited. Additionally, Mr. Muhammad Waseem Aslam replaced Mr. Luqman as CFO in January 2025, bringing nearly two decades of experience to the role.


Effectiveness

There is no formal management committee, however, the Company maintains an adequate IT infrastructure and related controls. Additionally, a delegation of authority matrix by sponsors to management is considered positive for management effectiveness.


MIS

Saif Textile has implemented Microsoft Dynamics-based ERP solutions with twelve operational modules including (i) Payable, (ii) Receivable, (iii) Inventory, (iv) Procurement and sourcing, (v) Sales & Marketing, (vi) General Ledger, (vii) Fixed Assets, (viii) Cash and Bank Management, (ix) Product Information Management, (x) Organization Administration (xi) System Administration and (xii) External Asset Management. This system, while integrating the business functions of the company, helps the management in decision-making by collecting information timely. Moreover, all the IT departments of Saif Group are centralized.


Control Environment

The Company adheres to several quality assurance standards, including OEKA TEX 100, ISO 9001:2008, ISO 14001, Global Organic Textile Standards, and Supima. The Company maintains an effective internal audit department that enhance risk management, control, and governance processes. The department is comprised of a dedicated team led by an internal auditor.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The textile exports of the country reached USD 16.7bln in FY24, a slight increase from USD 16.5bln in the previous year, reflecting a growth of 0.93% YoY. The highest contribution came from the composite and garments segment at USD 9.1bln, followed by the weaving segment at USD 6.5bln and the spinning segment at USD 1.0bln. During 8MFY25, the textile exports stood at USD 12.2bln. Pakistan's exports to the USA were USD 4.02bln in FY24 and USD 2.83bln in 8MFY25. Recently, the USA imposed a 29.0% tariff on Pakistani exports. The subsequent impact on the broader dynamics of Pakistan's textile industry, as well as the adaptability of textile manufacturers, will be assessed in due course.


Relative Position

The Company’s association with the Saif Group strengthens its position in the local spinning industry. However, on a standalone basis, the Company’s share in the local spinning industry is considered adequate.


Revenues

During 9MFY25, the Company net revenue declined to PKR 8,693mln (FY24: PKR 12,249mln, 9MFY23: PKR 9,563mln), reflecting a 9% decrease from the same period last year. This was driven by increased yarn imports under the EFS scheme, which constrained market liquidity for local spinners, alongside a downward trend in international cotton prices that led to lower yarn prices. The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from local yarn sales, with a significant portion attributed to Accru yarn. The Company’s export markets include Brazil, Uzbakistan and Italy. However, the contribution of exports to total sales remains minimal, with total exports amounting to PKR 477mln in FY24. Accru yarn is the Company’s leading product, contributing approximately 90% of total sales, while the remaining 10% is generated from the other yarn types.


Margins

The margins are under stress due to the Company curtailed its capacity to access market-based liquidity during a period characterized by severe market illiquidity, influenced by weakened local demand for yarn and reduced operational cash flows.. Additionally, a rise in gas prices further strained margins, resulting in a reduction of gross margins to 11.2% (FY24: 14.6%). Following these, the net profit margin fell on the negative side and stood at -4.2%, contrasting with a net Profit margin of 0.1% in FY24 and 0.8% in 9MFY24. The Company recorded a net loss of PKR 367mln during 9MFY25; however, a gradual reduction in the policy rate, along with the management's strategic intent to diversify the product mix by shifting towards finer yarn counts (100s and above), is expected to cater to high-value niche segments and enhance profitability.


Sustainability

Following the recent reduction in electricity prices, the Company has shifted a major portion of its energy consumption to electricity. In pursuit of a sustainable renewable energy solution, STML is currently in negotiations with lender banks for the installation of an 8MW solar power plant, with an estimated project cost of PKR 750mln. Further, the Company is investing PKR 1.5 bln to expand its dyeing capacity from 17 tons per day to 27 tons per day. 


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 9MFY25, the company's net working capital days increased to 158 days, compared to 129 days in FY24. This increase is mainly due to an increase in inventory days, which increased to 118 days from 96 days. The company primarily funds its working capital requirements through short-term borrowings from conventional banks and an unsecured running finance facility from the sponsoring Company of  PKR 1.5bln. The short-term trade leverage of the Company stood at 9.6% depicts adequate room to borrow. 


Coverages

In 9MFY25, the Company's free cash flow from operations (FCFO) reached PKR 936mln, down from PKR 1,537mln in FY24, driven by the decline in profitability. Short-term borrowings increased to PKR 4,611mln from PKR 4,599mln in 9MFY25. Interest coverage stood at 1.0x and debt coverage at 0.8x. Moving forward, the improvement in coverages and overall credit quality metrics remains essential. 


Capitalization

During 9MFY25, the Company's leverage ratio increased to 66.5% from 64.1% in FY24 and 61.4% in 9MFY24. The equity base has also shown a downward trend over the last year due to losses after tax, standing at PKR 3.7 bln in 9MFY25 compared to PKR 4.1 bln in FY24. Strengthening the equity base will remain vital moving forward. The sponsor’s support, totalling PKR 2.1bln in the form of long-term subordinated loans and short-term working capital lines, remains critical to the sustainability of the Company’s financial risk profile. 


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 7,743 7,957 8,364 6,567
2. Investments 15 15 15 12
3. Related Party Exposure 0 2 25 46
4. Current Assets 6,878 6,320 5,057 7,246
a. Inventories 3,800 3,676 2,794 3,970
b. Trade Receivables 2,388 1,802 1,527 2,541
5. Total Assets 14,636 14,295 13,461 13,871
6. Current Liabilities 2,189 1,718 1,203 1,910
a. Trade Payables 945 700 430 427
7. Borrowings 5,216 5,297 6,346 7,068
8. Related Party Exposure 2,493 2,122 859 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 955 1,009 908 962
10. Net Assets 3,782 4,149 4,145 3,932
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,781 4,149 4,145 3,932
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 8,693 12,249 11,692 12,665
a. Cost of Good Sold (7,722) (10,455) (11,230) (10,304)
2. Gross Profit 971 1,793 462 2,361
a. Operating Expenses (322) (480) (529) (574)
3. Operating Profit 649 1,313 (67) 1,787
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 28 610 (13) (138)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 677 1,923 (80) 1,649
a. Total Finance Cost (986) (1,640) (1,497) (792)
b. Taxation (59) (272) 444 (575)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (367) 12 (1,134) 282
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 936 1,537 8 1,755
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 936 (40) (1,215) 1,062
c. Changes in Working Capital (330) (693) 1,327 (1,221)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 605 (734) 112 (159)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (28) 1 (177) (361)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (584) 737 38 519
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (7) 5 (27) (1)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -5.4% 4.8% -7.7% 19.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 11.2% 14.6% 4.0% 18.6%
c. Net Profit Margin -4.2% 0.1% -9.7% 2.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.0% 6.9% 11.4% 4.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -12.3% 0.3% -28.1% 7.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 184 146 169 160
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 158 129 156 149
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.1 3.7 4.2 3.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.0 1.1 0.1 2.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 0.8 0.0 1.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 128.3 314.5 -2.4 1.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 66.5% 64.1% 63.2% 64.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 123.1 70.0 86.2 92.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 16.9% 21.6% 17.9% 10.3%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com