Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Jun-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Jun-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-22 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
25-Jun-21 A A1 Positive Maintain -
About the Entity

ACT Wind (Private) Limited, incorporated in December 2010, is a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP) operating under the framework of the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, overseen by the Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB). The capital structure of the project includes 75% debt financing, amounting to PKR 6,008 million, with the debt priced at 3-month KIBOR plus 3% per annum. The debt has a ten-year repayment tenure, initiated in April 2017, to be repaid through twenty consecutive semi-annual installments. The Company's shareholding is equally divided among its three sponsors: Tapal Group, Ismail Power (Private) Limited (IPPL), and Akhtar Power (Private) Limited (APPL). These entities consolidated in August 2013 to jointly develop the wind power facility. Act’s Board of Directors consists of nine members, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Each sponsor group nominates three directors to the board. Mr. Maqsood Ismail currently serves as the Chairman of the Board, while Mr. Adnaan Tapal, an electrical engineer by qualification, has held the position of CEO since September 2011. The CEO is backed by a team of seasoned professionals. As per governance arrangements, the positions of Chairman and CEO are subject to nomination and election every two years, although they may continue beyond the term with the mutual consent of the board. Recently, Mr. Mehmood Suleman has joined the Company as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

Rating Rationale

Tapal, Ismail, and Akhtar groups have established a 30MW wind power project – Act Wind (Pvt) Limited (“Act Wind” or “the Company”) located in Jhimpir, Sindh. The project was developed under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, which ensures a guaranteed internal rate of return (IRR), indexed cost adjustments, and a pass-through tariff mechanism. The Company's revenues and cash flows are subject to two primary risks. First, wind risk: Under the upfront tariff model, the variability in wind availability is borne by the Company, making its cash flows potentially seasonal. Second, operational risk: The Company is obligated to maintain a 31% annual capacity factor. Mitigating this risk, operations and maintenance are handled by Hydro China, an experienced operator with both international and domestic credentials. Furthermore, the Company maintains comprehensive insurance coverage. For the six-month period ended FY25 (6MFY25), Act Wind reported sales revenue of approximately PKR 959 million, compared to PKR 1,667 million during the same period in 6MFY24. Net profit declined to around PKR 263 million in 6MFY25 from PKR 768 million in 6MFY24. The dip in earnings was primarily due to decreased operational output caused by government-mandated curtailments and lower wind availability. However, As per the management claim both profitability and energy generation have recovered during the ongoing fiscal period, supported by improved wind conditions and enhanced power offtake by the Government. The Company’s liquidity position has remained strong, with timely receipt of payments from CPPA-G. Act Wind has been able to meet its working capital needs entirely through internally generated cash flows, without resorting to short-term financing. The Company’s free cash flows remain healthy and sufficient for timely debt servicing. As of the reporting period, Act Wind has successfully repaid over 68% of its debt obligations on schedule, without utilizing the forbearance period, highlighting the strength of its financial structure and effective working capital management.

Key Rating Drivers

Sustaining sound financial discipline and consistently maintaining operational performance in accordance with the agreed benchmarks continue to be critical factors influencing the Company’s credit profile. The Company’s track record of meeting debt obligations through internally generated cash flows is viewed positively and serves as a supportive element for its credit rating.

Profile
Plant

The 30 MW ACT Wind Power Project is a renewable energy facility developed on a Build, Own, and Operate (BOO) basis near Jhimpir village, Sindh, covering 197 acres. Operated as a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP), the project falls under Pakistan’s Renewable Energy Policy 2006, regulated by the Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB).


Tariff

ACT Wind adopted the Upfront Tariff regime for wind power projects as determined by NEPRA in 2013. At the time of financial close, the levelized tariff (Years 1–20) was US¢ 16.6932 or PKR 16.2926 per kWh. Following Commercial Operations Date (COD) on 9th November 2016, the company filed for a tariff adjustment, resulting in a revised levelized tariff of PKR 18.45 per kWh. As of the April–June 2025 quarter, the tariff has been updated to PKR 29.0194 per kWh after indexation.


Return on Project

ACT Wind earns revenue primarily through the sale of electricity to the power purchaser. The project’s cost structure includes a non-escalable component for debt servicing, while ROE, insurance, and fixed & variable O&M costs fall under the escalable component. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR), as approved by NEPRA, is 13%.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

ACT Wind is jointly and equally owned by three prominent Pakistani business groups: Tapal Group, Ismail Group, and Akhtar Group, each holding a 33% equity stake in the company.


Stability

Stability in Independent Power Producers (IPPs) like ACT Wind is primarily derived from long-term agreements signed between the company and the power purchaser, ensuring predictable revenue streams. Additionally, ACT Wind’s ownership structure contributes significantly to its overall stability, with equal shareholding (33% each) held by three well-established and financially sound business groups: Tapal Group, Ismail Group, and Akhtar Group. This balanced and committed ownership base supports the project’s long-term financial and operational resilience.


Business Acumen

ACT Wind benefits from the strong business acumen of its three equal shareholders. The Tapal Group has extensive experience in power generation and industrial solutions, including ownership of TEL, a 126 MW Residual Furnace Oil-based power plant supplying electricity to K-Electric. The Ismail Group owns Ismail Industries Limited, one of Pakistan’s largest consumer goods companies, known for its brands Candyland, Bisconni, SnackCity, and Astro Films. The Akhtar Group brings expertise in manufacturing through Akhtar Textile Industries, a leading denim producer, and has diversified into the dairy sector with the launch of Dayfresh in 2009. This diverse industrial experience across energy, FMCG, textiles, and dairy strengthens ACT Wind’s strategic direction and operational capability.


Financial Strength

ACT Wind benefits from the strong financial backing of its sponsors, who possess the capability to support the company both on an ongoing basis and during times of financial stress. The sponsors—Tapal Group, Ismail Group, and Akhtar Group—have well-diversified and profitable business portfolios across energy, consumer goods, textiles, and dairy sectors. This financial resilience enhances the company’s credit profile and ensures stability in long-term operations.



Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BOD) of ACT Wind consists of nine members, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Each of the three sponsoring groups—Tapal Group, Ismail Group, and Akhtar Group—has three representatives on the Board, ensuring equal representation and balanced decision-making among the shareholders.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Maqsood Ismail currently serves as the Chairman of the Board. The Board comprises individuals with extensive experience across diverse sectors, including finance, accounting, project management, construction, and manufacturing. This diverse expertise supports effective governance and strategic oversight of ACT Wind’s operations.


Board Effectiveness

ACT Wind’s Board actively engages in regular discussions focused on key operational and financial matters. Topics such as plant efficiency, monthly budgets, and overall performance are routinely reviewed, ensuring informed decision-making and effective oversight of the company’s strategic and operational goals.


Financial Transparency

ACT Wind ensures high standards of financial transparency. Its external auditor, BDO Ebrahim & Co., an “A” category audit firm as ranked by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), expressed an unqualified opinion on the company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2024, reflecting accurate and reliable financial reporting.


Management
Organizational Structure

ACT Wind follows a flat organizational structure, typical of Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The internal team primarily consists of finance and technical staff, while key functions such as engineering, construction, and plant operations are outsourced to specialized service providers. This lean structure supports efficient management and cost-effective operations.


Management Team

Mr. Adnan Tapal, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ACT Wind, has been leading the company since assuming management control and brings over 20 years of experience across various industrial sectors. He is supported by a seasoned management team, including Mr. Mehmood Suleman, the newly appointed Chief Financial Officer (CFO), who brings 35 years of extensive experience in accounting and finance. Their combined leadership ensures strong strategic direction and sound financial management for the company.


Effectiveness

The management of ACT Wind has demonstrated strong effectiveness through consistent and progressive performance. Their strategic decision-making has led to more systematic processes and efficient operations. The presence of robust internal controls reflects the strength of the management team and their commitment to operational excellence, which has positively contributed to the company’s stability and growth.


Control Environment

ACT Wind maintains a strong control environment, supported by the use of advanced IT solutions that enhance efficiency, accuracy, and oversight across operations. The company’s IT infrastructure is well-developed, enabling effective monitoring and control mechanisms. The breadth and depth of activities managed through these systems reflect a mature and reliable internal environment, contributing to the overall governance and operational integrity of the organization.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

Under the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), if ACT Wind maintains plant availability at the contracted capacity of 31% and is ready to deliver electricity, the power purchaser is obligated to pay the full tariff, even if no electricity is dispatched. The payment is calculated based on the expected daily kWh production, multiplied by the applicable tariff, providing revenue certainty and effectively mitigating dispatch risk for the company.


Operation and Maintenance

ACT Wind has entered into a 10-year Operation and Maintenance (O&M) contract with Hydro China, starting from Commercial Operations Date (COD) in October 2016. Hydro China brings extensive expertise in the engineering, design, and operation of renewable energy projects, with a strong track record both within China and internationally, ensuring reliable and efficient plant performance.


Resource Risk

As a renewable energy IPP, ACT Wind is inherently exposed to wind resource variability, which is a key operational risk. Under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, wind risk is defined as the variability in wind speed that directly affects energy output. In line with the Upfront Tariff mechanism, ACT Wind fully absorbs the risk associated with wind variability, meaning any shortfall in generation due to lower wind speeds directly impacts the company's revenues.


Insurance Cover

ACT Wind maintains adequate insurance coverage, which includes protection against property damage and business interruption. This coverage ensures financial safeguarding of the company’s assets and operations in the event of unforeseen incidents, contributing to overall risk management and operational resilience.


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's power generation in FY-2024 dropped by 1.9% to 127,160 GWh, marking the second consecutive annual decline, driven by higher electricity costs, rising inflation, and reduced economic activity. Hydro power remained the largest contributor, making up 31% of total generation, followed by RLNG and nuclear power, each accounting for 19%. Local coal-based power plants contributed 12%, with the rest supplied by other thermal sources, including imported coal. A small portion comes from renewable resources like wind and solar.


Generation

The plant has the capacity to produce 262,800,000Kwh of electricity, the generation during FY24 declined due wind speed variation. However, the generation in 6MFY25 increased and looks promising to yield better results in FY25 as of April 2025 ACT Wind has generated 43 Gwh (FY24:74Gwh). During 6MFY25 the Company generated revenues of PKR 959 mln (FY24: PKR 3,012mln, FY23: 1,935PKRmln).


Performance Benchmark

The contracted efficiency of the plant is 31% and availability has been set up to 88%. The plant during 6MFY25owing to good wind speed performed according to the agreed efficiency of 31%.


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

The project is financed through debt constituting 75% of the total cost, amounting to PKR 6,008 million, priced at 3-month KIBOR plus 3% per annum. The debt has a 10-year repayment period starting from April 2017, with repayments scheduled in 20 equal semiannual installments. A Debt Service Reserve Account (DSRA), maintained via a Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC), holds funds equivalent to one upcoming principal and interest payment to ensure timely debt servicing. As of end-December 2025, the outstanding principal stands at PKR 1,945 million, with the final installment scheduled for June 2026, completing the repayment cycle.


Liquidity Profile

As of end-December 2024, Act Wind total receivables stood at PKR 429 million (FY24: PKR 1,018mln, FY23: PKR1,145, FY22: PKR 1,339mln).


Working Capital Financing

The Company is managing its working capital from internal cashflows generated. At Dec24, Networking days stood at 107day (FY24: 113days, FY23: 204days, FY22: 204days). The Company has not utilized any short-term borrowing lines to meet it working capital so far.


Cash Flow Analysis

As of December 2024, the Company’s Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFOs) stood at PKR 296 million (FY24: PKR 1,694 million, FY23: PKR 705 million, FY22: PKR 1,255 million), primarily due to a decline in generation, which led to reduced cash flows and consequently weaker coverage ratios. Interest coverage also deteriorated to 1.2x in 1HFY25 (FY24: 2.2x, FY23: 0.9x), indicating reduced headroom for meeting interest obligations. Additionally, since the loans are denominated in USD, the company remains exposed to exchange rate fluctuations, and adverse movements in PKR/USD parity could further strain debt servicing capacity.


Capitalization

The Company has a moderately leveraged capital structure, with leverage standing at 33% as of end-December 2024 (FY24: 36.5%, FY23: 53.3%), reflecting a consistent downward trend due to scheduled repayments. The entire debt comprises a 100% project-based long-term loan, indicating no additional corporate borrowings outside the project scope.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,346 4,523 4,894 5,265
2. Investments 846 756 50 54
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,087 1,664 1,526 1,927
a. Inventories 0 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 429 1,018 1,145 1,339
5. Total Assets 6,279 6,943 6,470 7,245
6. Current Liabilities 424 220 256 238
a. Trade Payables 213 110 182 137
7. Borrowings 1,945 2,455 3,312 3,988
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1 1 1 0
10. Net Assets 3,909 4,267 2,902 3,018
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,909 4,267 2,902 3,018
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 959 3,012 1,935 2,125
a. Cost of Good Sold (450) (835) (774) (644)
2. Gross Profit 508 2,177 1,162 1,481
a. Operating Expenses (31) (71) (57) (59)
3. Operating Profit 477 2,105 1,105 1,422
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 59 62 30 35
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 536 2,167 1,135 1,457
a. Total Finance Cost (263) (790) (781) (545)
b. Taxation (10) (12) (7) (7)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 263 1,364 347 905
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 296 1,694 705 1,255
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 296 1,694 705 1,255
c. Changes in Working Capital 968 (67) 289 428
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,265 1,627 994 1,684
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (50) (664) 17 383
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (1,131) (856) (1,140) (1,952)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 84 107 (129) 115
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -36.4% 55.6% -8.9% 2.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 53.0% 72.3% 60.0% 69.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 27.4% 45.3% 18.0% 42.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 131.9% 54.0% 51.4% 79.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.8% 33.1% 11.3% 28.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 138 131 234 274
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 107 113 204 255
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.6 7.6 6.0 8.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.2 2.2 0.9 2.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.3 0.9 0.4 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 29.0 2.7 -43.9 5.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 33.2% 36.5% 53.3% 56.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 21.6% 27.3% 21.4% 12.8%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com