Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Jul-25 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
04-Jul-24 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
04-Jul-23 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
04-Jul-22 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
06-Jul-21 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Engro Elengy Terminal (Private) Limited (EETPL), incorporated on January 9, 2014, is Pakistan’s first LNG terminal operator, commencing operations on March 29, 2015. Located at Berth No. 13, Port Qasim, Karachi, the terminal includes a 630 MMSCFD Floating Storage and Re-gasification Unit (FSRU) leased from Excelerate Energy, which also handles O&M services. EETPL is wholly owned by Elengy Terminal Pakistan Limited—jointly held by Engro Corporation (56%) and Vopak LNG Holding B.V. (44%), a global terminal operator. The Board comprises three directors: two from Engro and one from Vopak (Mr. Christopher Robert Robblee). After Mr. Mazhar Hasnani’s resignation, Syed Ammar Shah was appointed CEO. With over 16 years at Engro, Ammar played a key role in establishing the LNG terminal and, as former COO, oversaw 60% of Pakistan’s chemical, LPG, and LNG throughput. He currently also serves as CEO of Engro Vopak.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect the strong business profile of Engro Elengy Terminal (Private) Limited (EETPL or the Company), being the pioneer LNG terminal operator in Pakistan. The Company's strength is further reinforced by the Government of Pakistan’s continued commitment to meeting the country’s energy needs through imported LNG. Another key factor supporting the rating is the financial strength and extensive energy sector experience of its sponsors—Engro Corporation Limited and Vopak LNG Holding B.V. The installed Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU) has a guaranteed regasification capacity of 630 MMSCFD, with a peak capacity of 690 MMSCFD. This ensures a sizable and recurring revenue stream, as reflected in the Company’s topline of PKR 15.17 billion during 9MCY24 (CY23: PKR 21.3 billion). Operationally, EETPL maintained high performance, with terminal availability of 95% during the period—a result of technically sound operations and robust maintenance managed by Excelerate Energy (EE), the O&M operator, which remains a key source of operational reliability. EETPL benefits from a low business risk profile, supported by a long-term LNG services agreement with SSGC, ensuring guaranteed off-take. This translates into stable revenue and cash flows, subject to adherence to agreed operational parameters. Despite sectoral challenges, SSGC has consistently demonstrated timely payments, further supporting EETPL’s financial stability. The Company fully repaid its project-related debt in December 2024, resulting in a deleveraged balance sheet. Operational costs are now entirely met through robust internal cash generation, with minimal reliance on short-term borrowings. The adoption of IFRS-16, which requires the recognition of leased assets and corresponding liabilities, increased accounting leverage but had no material impact on the Company’s net financial position. Overall, strong internal cash flows continue to strengthen EETPL’s financial risk profile.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on smooth operations of the terminal, and conduct of sole buyer with reference to timely payments to Engro Elengy Terminal.

Profile
Legal Structure

Engro Elengy Terminal (Pvt) Limited is a Private Company (EETL), wholly owned by Elengy Terminal Pakistan Limited, which is a subsidiary of the Corporate conglomerate Engro Corporation Limited and Vopak LNG Holding B.V.


Background

Pakistan’s domestic gas production has been unable to meet the country’s demand. In order to overcome this shortage, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) started importing Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) since early 2015. Developments in LNG Industry boomed after the establishment of first LNG Regasification terminal by Engro Elengy Terminal (Private) Limited.


Operations

The terminal has been established as a special purpose vehicle to own and operate the LNG facilities and enter into all project related agreements including the LSA. It has leased a 630mmscfd baseload Floating Storage and Re-gasification Unit (FSRU) from Excelerate Energy with a peak regassification capacity of 690mmscfd.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Elengy Terminal Pakistan Limited holds 100% of the shares of Engro Elengy Terminal (Pvt) Ltd. Few years back, Vopak LNG Holding B.V. extended its shareholding in Elengy Terminal Pakistan Limited. Consequently, Engro Corp and Vopak LNG Holding B.V. now own 56% and 44% respectively


Stability

Dawood Hercules Corporation - along with Dawood Family and its associated concerns holds a major stake in Engro Corporation Limited through corporate and individuals. The Corporation has a distinguished name in Pakistan with diversified business interests. Therefore, the stability factor is considered strong.


Business Acumen

The Sponsor Acumen for EETL is extensive due to its association with Engro Corporation Limited.


Financial Strength

Engro Corporation Limited (ECL) has expanded its footing in diversified business avenues with a sizable portfolio of strategic investments. The group’s business portfolio spans various sectors including fertilizers, PVC resin, food, energy, and chemical terminal and storage businesses.


Governance
Board Structure

The board of directors (BoD) comprises three members including the CEO. Two members represent Engro Group while Mr. Christopher Robert Robblee represents Royal Vopak.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Ahsan Zafar serves as the chairman of the Company. He is also the CEO of Engro Energy Limited – one of the leading energy companies in Pakistan and a subsidiary of Engro Corporation. As the CEO he looks after various entities which include Engro Powergen Qadirpur Limited; Engro Powergen Thar Limited; Sindh Engro Coal Mining Company; Engro Energy Services Limited and Siddiqsons Energy Limited. Chris Robblee is President of Asia & Middle Division, Vopak, effective February 2022. Mr Robblee is also a member of the Strategic Committee of Royal Vopak. Based in Singapore, Mr. Robblee brings with him over 12 years of experience in the tank storage business with Vopak. In his current role, he heads the Asia and Middle East region including countries Australia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Thailand, Singapore, United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.


Board Effectiveness

The number of board meetings held during CY24 was five; wherein attendance by the board members is considered strong. Board Committees are also in place to assist the board in relevant matters.


Financial Transparency

M/S A.F.Ferguson & Co. Chartered Accountants is the external auditor of the company. They expressed an unqualified opinion on the company's annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024.


Management
Organizational Structure

Engro Elengy Terminal has a lean organizational structure. The overall operational responsibilities have been divided among four main departments: a) Commercial & Business Development, b) Terminal Management Team, c) Finance and d) HR & Admin. All functions, with the exception of Finance, are consolidated and shared with Engro Vopak Terminal Limited.


Management Team

Mr. Syed Ammar Shah joined Engro Elengy Terminal as CEO. He is leading strategic initiatives across various sectors at Engro for over 16 years. Mr. Ammar has played a key role in establishing Pakistan’s first LNG terminal and managed 60% of the country’s chemicals, LPG, and LNG throughput as COO of Engro Elengy and Vopak Terminals. He is supported by a team of qualified individuals, primarily comprising technical staff.


Effectiveness

A management committee comprising four members and chaired by the CEO; is in place to oversee the terminal operations. Other committee members include the CEO, CFO, COO, and HR&Admin Manager.


MIS

Daily MIS/Summary Report encompassing terminal operations concerning i) number of MMBTUs re-gasified and pumped into SSGC’s network ii) pressure of gas and iii) required amount of gas by SSGC on a daily basis is used to monitor the terminal performance.


Control Environment

EETL's quality of the I.T. infrastructure and the breadth and depth of activities performed has remained well satisfactory.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Production of natural gas from indigenous resources is decreasing in Pakistan. Thus, to bridge the supply demand gap, Pakistan’s reliance on imported Re-gasified Liquified Natural Gas (RLNG) has been increasing in recent years. With depleting gas reserves and rising demand, the share of imported gas is expected to go up, in the absence of any major reserve discovery. At present, the capacity of two Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRU) for RLNG is more than 1,200MMSCFD.


Relative Position

This was the first Company in Pakistan to commission an LNG terminal in Mar, 2015. One of the most cost-efficient LNG terminals in the region, it has the capacity for regasification of up to a peak of 690 mmscfd (guaranteed capacity: 630 mmscfd & uncontracted capacity: 0 mmscfd) or 4.5 million tons of LNG per year and terminal capacity utilization ranges between 590 to 630 mmscfd based on customer’s demand. With 50% of Pakistan's LNG import and regassification capacity, relative position of EETL remains strong.


Revenues

During 9MCY24, revenue witnessed a similar trend standing at PKR 15bln (9MCY23: PKR 16bln) 



Margins

During 9MCY24, gross margins were reported at 37% , an increased when compared to the previous years trends (9MCY23: 34.5%) . Similarly, operating margins also almost remained on similar levels (Operating; 9MCY24: 32.7%; 9MCY23: 31.5%). However, net margins increased due to better other income generated through short term investments and bank deposits and stood at 24.3% (9MCY23: 15.9%).


Sustainability

Depleting indigenous gas reserves and a transition towards cleaner and cheaper power generation have been the major factors driving the country towards adding LNG to its energy mix. Over the past few years, the government has established the basic LNG infrastructure, which has helped bridge the gas supply-demand shortfall, and lately, there has been some progress toward private sector participation in LNG import. In light of the increasing need for LNG in the Country EETL also has expansion plans and those will materialize after the necessary pending approval /arrangements from the relevant stakeholders have been finalized.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The working capital cycle of the company is largely a function of receivables from SSGC and payment to suppliers; any delays in payment from SSGC may impede the company’s working capital. As at end-Sep-24, net cash cycle stood at 2 days (Sep-23: 19days). The Company doesn't rely on short term borrowings and manages its working capital through internal cash generation.


Coverages

During Sep-24 interest coverage increased to 50.0x (end-Sep 23: 6.6x) due to considerable decrease in finance income on lease liability and exchange gain on borrowings. Debt servicing ability, however, remains strong, due to i) sustainable margins ii) sizable stream of cash flows and iii) association with sponsors of robust financial strength. Going forward, repayment of principal portion of the loans is expected to remain comfortable, given fixed capacity payments from SSGC.


Capitalization

For the year ended-Sep24, leveraging stood at ~81% on account of elevated lease liabilities. The borrowings comprise solely of long-term funding. During 2021 , the company entered into a new financing arrangement with ABL and prepaid lenders of the company under CTA through single payment.


 
 

Jul-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
9M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Dec-21
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 59,391 66,409 61,349 54,309
2. Investments 910 1,632 2,118 1,512
3. Related Party Exposure 20 18 13 17
4. Current Assets 16,597 13,972 10,876 8,348
a. Inventories 0 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 2,782 2,720 2,638 1,784
5. Total Assets 76,918 82,032 74,355 64,185
6. Current Liabilities 5,925 4,902 5,376 3,249
a. Trade Payables 3,927 1,373 1,290 953
7. Borrowings 54,958 62,222 57,294 50,232
8. Related Party Exposure 0 272 73 138
9. Non-Current Liabilities 3,361 5,453 4,154 3,086
10. Net Assets 12,674 9,184 7,458 7,480
11. Shareholders' Equity 12,674 9,184 7,458 7,480
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 15,174 21,310 16,409 12,960
a. Cost of Good Sold (9,532) (14,271) (10,797) (8,678)
2. Gross Profit 5,643 7,039 5,612 4,282
a. Operating Expenses (687) (549) (538) (469)
3. Operating Profit 4,956 6,490 5,074 3,813
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 1,321 1,272 638 218
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 6,277 7,762 5,712 4,031
a. Total Finance Cost (156) (891) (965) (811)
b. Taxation (2,437) (3,345) (2,318) (1,671)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 3,684 3,526 2,428 1,549
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 7,774 3,373 5,569 3,772
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,567 3,729 5,224 3,416
c. Changes in Working Capital 292 584 (407) (339)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 3,859 4,312 4,817 3,077
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 1,018 (1,301) (1,252) (103)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (3,005) (3,570) (3,902) (3,868)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 1,871 (558) (337) (893)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -5.1% 29.9% 26.6% -20.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 37.2% 33.0% 34.2% 33.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 24.3% 16.5% 14.8% 11.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 53.2% 18.6% 31.5% 26.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 44.9% 42.4% 32.5% 21.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 50 46 49 47
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 2 23 24 23
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.8 2.9 2.0 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 25.6 6.2 7.2 7.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.1 0.3 0.7 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 5.4 23.9 12.1 15.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 81.3% 87.2% 88.5% 87.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 45.8 7.6 7.6 4.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 0.3% 1.2% 1.5% 2.4%

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-25

www.pacra.com