Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
25-Jul-25 AA+ A1+ Stable Maintain -
26-Jul-24 AA+ A1+ Stable Maintain -
27-Jul-23 AA+ A1+ Stable Maintain -
30-Jul-22 AA+ A1+ Stable Maintain -
30-Jul-21 AA+ A1+ Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited ('FFC' or 'the Company') is a public listed company, incorporated in 1978. The Company is engaged in marketing and sales of Urea, DAP, SOP, MOP, Boron, and Zinc. During CY24, the Company achieved a major milestone in expansion through merger with FFBL and acquisition of equity in Agritech Limited. As a result, FFC's annual Urea and DAP production capacity has reached to 2,599 KT and 650 KT respectively. The utilization level stood at ~124% during CY24 including contribution by Port Qasim plant during second half of the year. Fauji Foundation owns the majority stake of FFC at ~44%. The rest of the ownership is shared among the general public, foreign companies, public sector companies and financial institutions. The Company's Board is chaired by Lt. Gen Anwar Ali Hyder, HI(M) (Retired), whereas Mr. Jahangir Piracha heads the Company as the CEO, supported by a team of professionals. FFC as a Group holds a strong, diversified portfolio with strategic investments across key sectors including cement, fertilizer, banking, energy, food, and services sectors. This balanced portfolio reinforces the Company's market resilience and enhanced value creation.

Rating Rationale

Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited's ('FFC' or 'the Company') ratings reflect a strong market leadership position within Pakistan’s fertilizer industry, augmented by its association with Fauji Foundation, a growth-driven ‘Social Hybrid Enterprise’. FFC operates a strategically integrated production system with an average plant utilization rate above 124%. The Company holds a sizable long-term investment of ~PKR 77bln and substantial asset base of PKR 417bln as of CY24, comprising investments across multiple sectors of Pakistan, which has now consolidated further. The Company’s governance structure is robust, a diverse Board, which comprises of dynamic and highly skilled professionals. The Company is led by a seasoned management team. Following the acquisition of Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Limited (FFBL), along with the acquisition of equity stake in Agritech (an associated company), FFC has emerged as the largest player in the fertilizer sector. This has expanded the FFC outreach in Urea market share to ~49% and DAP to ~63% as at Mar-25. The merger has notably enhanced FFC’s turnover to ~PKR 374bln in CY24 (CY23: ~PKR 159bln). The Company reported sales volume of 2,942 KT of Urea and 670 MT of DAP including imports. Despite headwinds, such as rising gas prices and inflationary pressures, FFC has demonstrated growth in profitability due to improved off-takes, record investment and dividend income. Additionally, effective cost control initiatives further strengthened the bottom line. The financial risk profile reflects a stable capital structure, stronger balance sheet with enhanced borrowing capacity, maintaining a favorable position for the Company. Coverages remain solid, supported by improved free cash flows, with risks well managed.

Key Rating Drivers

FFC's market dominance, strategic importance with Fauji Foundation, well-diversified product and investment portfolios and disciplined financial management underpin its strong market leadership position within Pakistan’s fertilizer sector.

Profile
Legal Structure

Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited ('FFC' or 'the Company') is a public listed company and was incorporated in 1978 as per the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017).


Background

FFC was established as a joint venture between Fauji Foundation (FF), a charitable trust incorporated under the Charitable Endowments Act 1890, and Haldor Topsoe A/S of Denmark, a global leader in catalyst technology. The Company began operations in 1982 with its first urea plant in Goth Machhi, with a capacity of 570,000 MT per annum. In 1993, Plant-II was added at the same site, and FFC made its initial investment in Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Limited (FFBL). In 2002, it acquired the former Pak-Saudi Fertilizer plant in Mirpur Mathelo (Plant-III). During 2024, Company achieved a major milestone in expansion through merger with FFBL, adding Plant IV with a capacity of producing 551,000 MT Urea and 650,000 MT DAP. The Company also has diversified investments in banking, power, food, and cement. 


Operations

FFC is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of fertilizer products including Urea, DAP, SOP, MOP, Boron and Zinc. It operates four urea plants: Plant-I and Plant-II in Goth Machhi, Plant-III at Mirpur Mathelo, and now also manages production at Port Bin Qasim through the merged FFBL operations. In CY24, the Company achieved record Urea production of 2,841 KT, including 286 KT from Port Bin Qasim. This reflects a high utilization rate of ~124%. Total fertilizer production reached 3,293 KT, supported by improved gas supply to Port Qasim plant and no major turn arounds at Goth Machhi and Mirpur Mathelo.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

FFC is majority owned by Fauji Foundation (~44%). General public holds (~25%). Rest of the ownership lies with foreign companies (~3%), public sector companies & financial institutions (~21%) and others (~7%).


Stability

The ownership structure is stable as majority of the shareholding vests with the sponsor (FF).


Business Acumen

Fauji Foundation (FF), founded in 1954, has emerged as one of the leading conglomerates of the country, with established business interests in various diversified sectors i.e., agriculture, food, power, oil and gas, marine terminals, financial services, and cement sectors.


Financial Strength

Besides holding formidable standing in FFC, the sponsors have extensive investments in agriculture, power, oil and gas, marine terminals, financial services, and cement sectors, which fortifies their sound financial strength. In CY24, FFC has 7 subsidiaries, 4 associated companies and 1 joint venture with an equity as per consolidated financial statements of ~PKR 245bln (CY23: ~PKR 150bln) and an asset base of ~PKR 574bln (CY23: ~PKR 327bln). Through its diverse set of business, it is generating a turnover of ~PKR 411bln (CY23: ~PKR 181bln) and posted a consolidated PAT of ~PKR 86bln (CY23: ~PKR 47bln).


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises of thirteen members; out of which eight (8) are Non-Executive Directors, four (4) are Independent and one (1) is an Executive Director. The BoD holds considerable independence for policy and decision making, along with the key source of guidance for the management. 


Members’ Profile

The BoD is chaired by Lt Gen Anwar Ali Hyder, HI(M) (Retd). He has professional experience of over three decades. All members on the BoD have diversified experience. Brig Khurram Shahzada SI (M) (Retd) has replaced Brig. Zulfiqar Ali Haider, (Retd), as the Company Secretary during 1QCY25.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD has various committees to assist in governing the affairs of the Company such as Audit Committee, HR and Remuneration Committee, System and Technology Committee, Strategy and Investment Committee and Sustainability Committee.The Board and its committees met regularly, with the Audit, Strategy and Investment and System and Technology Committees each convening five times, while HR and Remuneration Committee and Sustainability Committee met thrice and twice respectively. Attendance remained high across all meetings, and minutes were adequately maintained, reflecting good governance and decision making quality. 


Financial Transparency

FFC's external auditor, A.F Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, has issued an unqualified opinion on CY24's financial statements.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well defined organizational structure and operates among others, through Manufacturing & Operations, Technology Division, Corporate Affairs, Finance, Marketing & Sales and Human Resources. All functional Heads reports to the CEO, who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit reports administrative matters to the CEO and functionally to the Audit Committee.


Management Team

Mr. Jahangir Piracha replaced Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Rehman, as the CEO during CY24. He has previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Engro Polymer & Chemicals Limited, Engro Vopak Terminal Limited, Engro Elengy Terminal Limited and Engro Powergen Qadirpur Limited. The CFO, Syed Atif Ali, serves on the Board of Foundation Wind Energy I and II Ltd, Thar Energy Ltd and Food Security and Agriculture Centre of Excellence, Trustee on Sona Welfare Foundation and FFBL Power Company Limited. Overall, the management team is experienced professionals. 


Effectiveness

The management is assissted through three (3) Committees, i.e., Executive Committee, Strategy Committee and Corporate Social Responsibility Committee. Meetings of these Committees are held on periodic basis to ensure efficiency and strategic planning; while miniutes each meeting is adequately maintained and circulated for review and approval.


MIS

FFC has a state of the art IT infrastructure in place, including SAP software. The Company has maintained a profound management system that enables smooth operations of business processes and provides an end to end solution for financial, logistical, distribution, inventory, plant maintenance and human capital management.


Control Environment

FFC has an effective in-house internal audit function which assists in monitoring internal controls and solutions, while reporting to the Audit Committee.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Fertilizer industry is mainly dominated by three players, i.e., Fauji Fertilizers Company Limited, Engro, and Fatima. Urea and DAP remain the primary fertilizers by volume. While Pakistan is self-sufficient in Urea, gas shortages necessitate Urea imports (~0.2mln MT in CY24). DAP is largely imported, as FFC is the only local manufacturer. Total fertilizer production averaged ~9.1mln MT (CY20-24) vs offtake of ~9.9mln MT. In CY24, production rose ~6.9% YoY, while offtake dipped ~1.1% YoY. Urea led production (~53.6%), while Urea and DAP formed ~65.6% and ~16.2% of the total offtake, respectively. DAP imports surged ~80.4% in CY24, likely driven by Punjab’s Kissan Card Scheme of ~PKR 75bln. Overall, the sector's outlook remains stable.


Relative Position

FFC is the largest player in the fertilizer segment in Urea and DAP with a market share (including FFBL) of ~48% and ~62%, respectively, in CY24 (CY23: 43% and 60% respectively).


Revenues

The Company experienced increased revenue (CY24: ~PKR 374bln, CY23: ~PKR 159bln) owing to the increased production of Urea along with the support of DAP sales post FFBLs merger with and into FFC (CY24: ~3.293mlnT, CY23: ~2.521mlnT). During 1QCY25, the Company showed the revenue of ~PKR 64bln (1QCY24: ~PKR 58bln).


Margins

Owing to increase in the sales of the Company, the gross margins stood at ~34% during CY24 (CY23: ~40%). On the other hand, due to inflation and increased cost of raw material, net profit margins decreased a bit and stood at ~17% during CY24 (CY23: ~19%). For 1QCY25, gross profit margin and net profit margins stood at ~36% and ~21%, respectively (1QCY24 - GP Margin: ~30%, NR Margin: ~18%). Going forward, the merger with FFBL is expected to bring in synergies and reduced cost, enhancing the Company's profitability.


Sustainability

FFC carries a sizable investment book, along with an equity portfolio comprising of entities in the banking, power, food, and cement sectors. FFC has entered into an agreement to ensure sustainable supply of gas. This along with the merger with FFBL, and substantial stake acquired in Agritech has stablized the Company's footing in the sector. This would further benefit the Company, going forward.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are a function of its inventory and trade receivables, which are financed through internal cash generation and short-term borrowings. Over the years, the Company has been able to maintain a strong position in its working capital management. In CY24, due to increase in sales average inventory days improved and stood at 13 days (CY23: 25 days). Receivable days remained nil, indicating strong financial discipline and effective oversight by management in maintaining timely collections. Trade payables decreased to 13 days in CY24 (CY23: 18 days). Gross working capital days of the Company stood at 13 days in CY24 (CY23: 25 days). In 1QCY25, average inventory days increased to 48 days (1QCY24: 3 days). Trade receivable remain managed, while trade payable days increased to 25 days (1QCY24: 3 days). Going forward, the Company's working capital managment is expected to remain streamlined.


Coverages

In CY24, the Company’s free cashflows from operations increased to ~PKR 69bln (CY24: ~PKR 41bln) on the back of higher profitability. Interest coverage ratio stood at 10.9x in CY24 (CY23: 7.4), due to increase in EBITDA (CY24: PKR 114bln, CY23: PKR 59bln). Total interest coverage also increased and stood at 5.2x in CY24 (CY23: 3.5x). Going forward, coverage ratios are expected to remain stable.


Capitalization

The leverage of the Company improved and stood at ~35% in CY24 (CY23: ~38%) due to increase in equity of the Company following the merger with FFBL (CY24: PKR ~132bln, CY23: PKR ~62bln). Short term borrowings stood at PKR 31bln in CY24 (CY23: PKR 14bln). Whereas, long term borrowings of the Company, including current mauturity, stood at PKR 38bln in CY24 (CY23: PKR 24bln). In 1QCY25, the leverage of the Company stood at ~30% (1QCY24: ~26%). Short term borrowings comprises of PKR ~12bln in 1QCY25 (1QCY24: PKR~ 0.7bln) while the long term borrowings, including current maturity comprises of PKR 37bln in 1QCY25 (1QCY24: PKR 23bln). Going forward, capital structure is expected to remain adequate.


 
 

Jul-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
3M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 65,022 61,660 44,437 33,772
2. Investments 147,073 210,758 97,444 105,008
3. Related Party Exposure 70,686 70,055 47,814 46,960
4. Current Assets 87,432 74,480 33,586 54,381
a. Inventories 42,637 23,744 2,068 19,488
b. Trade Receivables 197 944 49 372
5. Total Assets 370,214 416,952 223,281 240,122
6. Current Liabilities 170,208 180,070 113,494 95,665
a. Trade Payables 12,602 18,013 7,989 8,125
7. Borrowings 48,868 69,479 38,050 79,768
8. Related Party Exposure 26,112 25,455 5,872 2,641
9. Non-Current Liabilities 9,746 10,067 4,012 11,213
10. Net Assets 115,280 131,881 61,853 50,835
11. Shareholders' Equity 115,280 131,881 61,853 50,835
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 63,637 373,537 159,472 109,364
a. Cost of Good Sold (40,988) (246,364) (95,220) (69,317)
2. Gross Profit 22,649 127,173 64,252 40,046
a. Operating Expenses (6,098) (29,364) (12,684) (10,108)
3. Operating Profit 16,551 97,809 51,568 29,939
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 5,552 17,799 4,746 8,616
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 22,103 115,608 56,314 38,555
a. Total Finance Cost (1,699) (6,524) (5,624) (4,868)
b. Taxation (7,126) (44,352) (21,017) (13,637)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 13,278 64,731 29,673 20,050
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (2,524) 68,604 41,268 19,392
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (3,080) 61,163 35,445 20,704
c. Changes in Working Capital (34,747) 33,383 25,433 (13,735)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (37,827) 94,546 60,878 6,969
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 2,372 827 (5,860) (6,258)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (13,957) (24,124) (15,036) (16,105)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (49,412) 71,249 39,982 (15,394)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -31.9% 134.2% 45.8% 0.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 35.6% 34.0% 40.3% 36.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 20.9% 17.3% 18.6% 18.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -58.6% 27.3% 41.8% 5.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 43.0% 66.8% 52.7% 40.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 48 13 25 36
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 26 0 7 17
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 9.8 18.2 11.3 6.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -0.7 5.2 3.6 1.9
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -2.2 0.6 0.7 1.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 29.8% 34.5% 38.1% 61.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 115.4 53.8 88.9 114.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 16.9% 17.1% 13.7% 7.9%

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-25

www.pacra.com