Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Jul-25 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
19-Jul-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
20-Jul-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Medipak Limited was founded in Pakistan on January 14th, 1982, as a public limited company. It is a leading Pakistani manufacturer and marketer of life-saving infusion therapy solutions. Established by Dr. Khalid J. Chowdhry, the Company offers a comprehensive range of products, including IV administration sets, dialysis solutions, and various pharmaceuticals. The CEO, Mr. Naveed K. Chowdhry boasts over 20 years in the IV sector, while Ms. Naureen Khalid, the MD, brings over 3 decades of expertise and knowledge. Together, they lead a team of qualified and skilled professionals from diverse backgrounds.

Rating Rationale

Medipak Limited (‘Medipak’ or ‘the Company’) is a prominent and only public limited company specializing in life-saving intravenous (IV) infusion therapy solutions, offering in both LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene) and PP (Polypropylene) packaging. The Company boasts a diverse product portfolio, with a primary focus on IV solutions and administration sets, complemented by ophthalmic preparations and dialysis solutions. The ratings reflect on their long-standing position as a leader in the domestic market for IV solutions. Medipak, in collaboration with Fresenius AG, has established operational excellence in the competitive Pakistani IV infusion market, driven by rising healthcare awareness, improved access, an aging population, and chronic disease prevalence. Back in 1982, Medipak made a contribution to creating self-reliance within infusion therapy in Pakistan by pioneering local manufacturing at the Kot Lakhpat (KLP) plant in Quaid-e-Azam Industrial Estate, which includes a wide range of production facilities. During 2015, the Company carried out CAPEX to develop a second facility in Sundar Industrial Estate, developed with Chinese technology, with exclusive double euro-cap manufacturing. Both facilities are compliant with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and are supported by ISO 17025-certified laboratories, along with integrated ISO 9001, 14001, 45001, and 13485:2016 certified quality management systems. The Local IV solution market is competitive with the existence of numerous players. As per the management representation, Pakistan’s total IV solutions market has an installed capacity of ~500mln units, in which the current production stands at ~250mln units, and Medipak has an estimated share of ~13%. During 9MFY25, Medipak’s topline showed ~10.2% quarter-over-quarter decline, primarily due to a dip in volumes impacted by ongoing balancing, modernization, and replacement (BMR) activities, which are expected to conclude by year-end. However, the Company’s gross and net margins improved, supported by cost efficiencies and a reduction in finance costs. The Company’s sponsors have a solid understanding of the business with decades of experience. However, the board consists of close family members and lacks independent oversight, indicating room for improvement. The Company is managed by professional leadership, and appropriate internal control systems are in place throughout the organization. Establishing a formal internal audit department would further improve the control environment. Going forward, Medipak is strategically pivoting towards high-demand products to capitalize on emerging market trends. Additionally, the Company is exploring expansion opportunities to enhance market share and long-term sustainability. The financial risk profile is demonstrated by adequate cash flows, coverages, and working capital cycle. Its capital structure is low-leveraged, mainly encompassing STBs.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent on the Company’s ability to maintain its leadership position within its business niches in a dynamic market environment. Achieving consistent revenue growth, improving profit margins, and delivering on prudent financial management and performance, outlined in the latest projections, will remain critical.

Profile
Legal Structure

Medipak Limited (‘Medipak’ or ‘the Company’), incorporated in Pakistan on January 14, 1982 as a public limited company. The Company’s registered office is located at 132/1 Quaid-e-Azam, Industrial Estate, Kot Lakhpat, Lahore.


Background

Medipak was established in 1982 by Dr. Khalid J. Chowdhry & family with the founding philosophy of giving the best to life. The Company made a significant contribution to creating self-reliance within infusion therapy in Pakistan by pioneering the local manufacturing of quality and cost-effective products that have now been time-tested for decades. The Company has transitioned and is led by 2nd-generation family members.


Operations

Medipak is principally engaged in the manufacturing of IV infusion therapy life-saving products. It is also involved in manufacturing ophthalmic preparations, solid dosage forms, dialysis & irrigation solutions and medical devices. The Company’s production facilities were set up through technical collaboration with multiple MNCs, including Fresenius AG (Germany). The Company is ISO 9001,14001, 45001, IEC 17025, and 13485:2016 certified. 


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Medipak is mainly owned by Sponsoring family where majority stake of 75.86% resides with Dr. Khalid J. Chowdhry and ~23.77% stake rests with other family members. A minor proportion of 0.37% rests with an individual member. This concentrated ownership structure highlights their strong commitment to long-term value creation and rigorous performance monitoring. However, it also indicates potential biases in decision-making and a limited range of viewpoints.


Stability

The current ownership structure appears to be secure, with no imminent anticipation of significant changes in shareholding. The sponsoring family maintains full control, holding approximately 99.63% stake. However, establishing a clearly defined and streamlined shareholding pattern among family members along with a formal documented succession plan, could further enhance the company’s stability and governance.


Business Acumen

Dr. Khalid J. Chowdhry & family (prime sponsors) have strong business acumen. Medipak has been operating in Pakistan for a number of decades now and made its presence by pioneering the first integrated Infusion Solution and IV Administration Set manufacturing. Moreover, the 'Chowdhry Family' has ventured into different sectors of Pakistan.


Financial Strength

Medipak Limited, the flagship entity of Medipak Group, maintains a healthy financial profile with substantial access to domestic and international markets. The sponsors’ ability to provide the support is considered good, should the need arise.


Governance
Board Structure

The board of Medipak Limited comprises four members, including Mr. Khalid J. Chowdhry (the Chairman), Mr. Nasir J. Chowdhry (Advisor), Mr. Naveed K. Chowdhry (the CEO), and Ms. Nosheen Khalid (Non-executive director). Notably, there are no independent directors, leading to a board dominated by the sponsoring family. This raises concerns about the lack of independent oversight and challenges to management, which could impede effective governance. However, all the directors have been associated with the board for many decades now and a few holds related DTP trainings.


Members’ Profile

The business is led by three highly experienced individuals with a combined professional expertise of 60+ years. Mr. Muhammad Khalid J. Chowdhry, the Chairman, is the driving force behind Medipak’s success, known for his visionary leadership and service on the boards of several companies. Mr. Nasir J. Chowdhry brings over 50 years of professional experience and holds directorships in other group companies. Mr. Naveed Khalid, the CEO, also possess extensive expertise in the industry, playing a key role in steering the company forward.


Board Effectiveness

The board has created two sub-committees: i) Audit Committee and ii) Human Resource Committee to ensure effective governance. Board meetings of the Company are held quarterly in compliance with the principles of corporate governance, and all meeting minutes are documented properly.


Financial Transparency

M/S BDO Ebrahim & Co., are the external auditors of the Company. The auditors have expressed an unqualified audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements for June, 2024. The auditor is listed in Category “A” of the SBP’s panel of auditors. 


Management
Organizational Structure

A well-defined organizational structure exists in the Company. The functions reporting to the CEO and MD are as follows: 1) Finance, 2) Marketing & Sales, 3) Administration, 4) IT, 5) Technical Services, 6) HRM, 7) Quality Assurance & Regulatory Affairs, 8) Plant Operations, 9) Material Management, and 10) Business Development. Each department is headed by an experienced professional.


Management Team

Mr. Naveed K. Chowdhry (CEO) is equipped with a profound understanding of the IV industry and carries a wealth of experience of over 2 decades. He completed undergraduate studies at Cornell University (BA Econ’98) and holds graduate degrees from LUMS (MBA’01) and the London School of Economics & Political Sciences (MSc Fin & Eco ’02). He has been supported in the business by a weathered MD (family member), Ms. Naureen Khalid, having experience of leading multiple domains such as operations, marketing, business development, and finance for over 3 decades. She has graduated from LUMS (MBA’92) and further executive education from Harvard Business School (Owner/President Management Program’15). The CFO, Mr. Nasir, is a Fellow Chartered Accountant, contributing over 20 years of relevant expertise and a diverse skill set. This leadership is further assisted by a team of experienced professionals, ensuring good governance and strategic direction.


Effectiveness

With the support of an experienced team of professionals, Medipak is building up its business strengths and increasing its footprint. The functions of the management are clear and well-defined to effectively achieve its underlying goals and objectives. Further, six management committees are in place to ensure control at all levels.


MIS

Business management operations at the Company are streamlined through SAP ERP solutions. The Company is presently using SAP B1. It has multiple operational modules to keep track of daily and monthly reports required by the management.


Control Environment

To ensure operational efficiency and appraisal of internal controls, the Company has an in-house internal control department that implements and monitors the policies and procedures of the Company.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s Pharmaceutical sector recorded a revenue of ~PKR 963bln during FY24 with a YoY growth of ~36.6% (FY23: ~PKR 705bln). The top 10 companies operating in the local market comprised ~48.2% of market share in the pharmaceutical sector, whereas the rest of the sector players made up ~51.8% during FY24. A total of ~662 companies are operating in the local pharmaceutical sector, including ~25 multinational companies in FY24. As of May, 2025, ~23 pharmaceutical manufacturers hold licenses to produce APIs. These companies together cater ~15.0% of API production, with the remaining 85.0% being imported. During FY24, pharmaceutical imports stood at PKR 245.6bln, marking a ~4.0% decline from ~PKR 255.9bln in FY23. However, in the 11MFY25, imports surged to ~PKR 304.1bln, reflecting a ~7.1% increase compared to the same period last year. The sector is dominated by local/ national companies which account for more than ~67% of the total market share in terms of their revenue. In FY24 total pharmaceutical exports were recorded at ~PKR 96.1bln (FY23: ~PKR 80.6bln) an increase of ~19.3% YoY. In 11MFY25, total exports rose to ~PKR 119.3bln, up by ~35.2% compared to the same period last year. The increase in exports during 11MFY25 is attributed to the government’s decision to deregulate non-essential medicines, which spurred investment, fostered innovation, and enabled competitive pricing, collectively enhancing the sector’s export performance. Production of pharmaceutical products such as tablets, capsules and injections rose marginally from ~18.9bln units in FY23 to ~19.9bln units in FY24, accounting for ~5.3% YoY increase. During 10MFY25, production of these products recorded an increase of ~6.3% YoY and clocked in at ~16.8bln (SPLY: ~15.8bln). Surging pharmaceutical exports and a relatively stable PKR mean higher revenue for companies, leading to increased profit margins. Furthermore, the demand for I.V. solutions in Pakistan has been steadily increasing due to the rising prevalence of chronic disease, the aging population, and the need for effective drug delivery methods.


Relative Position

Currently, there are numerous active and inactive players in the IV solutions segment with a total capacity of ~500mln units and the current production stands at ~250mln units during 9MFY25 in which Medipak holds a market share of ~12.46% as per the management.


Revenues

During 9MFY25, the Company’s sales showed ~10.2% quarter-over-quarter decline compared to a growth of ~8.7% during 9MFY24, primarily due to ongoing BMR activities. Local sales continued to dominate the revenue mix, contributing ~94.6% of total revenue, while exports accounted for the remaining 5.4%.


Margins

During 9MFY25, the Company’s gross margin increased to ~29.1% (FY24: ~24.8%, 9MFY24: ~20.5%), reflecting better cost efficiency. However, the operating profit margin reduced to ~7.6% in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~8.1%, 9MFY24: ~4.4%), majorly due to higher operating expenses on a year-on-year basis. In contrast, the profit before tax margin improved in 9MFY25 and stood at ~4.8% as compared to ~1.2% in 9MFY24. This improvement is primarily driven by a reduction in finance cost during the period.


Sustainability

Despite the presence of numerous registered companies and intense competition in Pakistan’s IV solutions market, the Company maintains a pioneering position in the manufacturing of Infusion Solutions and IV Administration Sets. Medipak’s product portfolio plays a vital role in supporting the healthcare needs and overall well-being of the population. In recognition of this responsibility, the Company consistently undertakes routine BMR activities and proactively plans for future expansions to effectively meet evolving consumer demand.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Medipak’s capital needs emanate from financing inventories and trade receivables, for which the Company relies on internal cash flow generation and borrowings. During 9MFY25, the Company’s gross working capital days extended to ~148 days (FY24: ~125 days, 9MFY24: ~133 days, FY23: ~123 days, FY22: ~118 days). Subsequently, the net working cycle stood at ~127 days in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~110 days, 9MFY24: ~125 days, FY23: ~109 days, FY22: ~94 days).


Coverages

Medipak’s interest coverage ratio has improved slightly from last year, reaching 2.9x in 9MFY25 (FY24: 2.3x, 9MFY24: ~2.0x, FY23: 3.5x, FY22: 3.0x), whereas the core debt coverage ratio also shows an upward trend, improving to 2.2x in 9MFY25 (FY24: 1.8x, 9MFY24: ~1.6x, FY23: 1.8x, FY22: 1.1x).


Capitalization

During 9MFY25, Medipak maintained a low-leveraged capital structure with a leverage ratio of ~20.2% (FY24: ~20.1%, 9MFY24: ~16.8%, FY23: ~21.6%, FY22: ~19.2%). Leveraging ratio remained unchanged year-on-year basis. The majority portion of the Company’s debt is comprised of short-term borrowings from various commercial banks.


 
 

Jul-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -15.4% 15.3% 34.8% 25.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 29.1% 24.8% 30.4% 28.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.8% 2.4% 5.2% 5.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.2% 9.6% 2.6% 6.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 4.0% 2.4% 4.7% 6.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 148 125 123 118
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 127 110 105 94
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.6 2.7 4.2 4.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.6 0.7 0.7 2.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 20.2% 20.1% 21.7% 19.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 69.5 59.9 90.5 116.8
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.4% 19.0% 16.9% 8.8%

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

Jul-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jul-25

www.pacra.com