Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
22-Aug-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Aug-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
25-Aug-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
26-Aug-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
27-Aug-21 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Be Energy Limited ('Be Energy' or 'the Company') became operational in 2007. The Company is mainly engaged in the procurement, storage, distribution, marketing, and import of petroleum products and lubricants. The Company is mainly owned by Rawafid Investments LLC (~90.98%), a UAE-based company, followed by Energy Petroleum Consultant Company (~8.99%), a Kuwait-based company. Rawafid Investments is primarily owned by Bakri family, which holds a stake in BE Group operating in aviation fuel services, shipping, time charter services, shipping management & marine support services across MENA region. Be Energy's BoD is chaired by Dr. Zohair Abdul Kader B AlBakri. Recently, Mr. M. Hani Abdul Kader B AlBakri has been appointed as the CEO. He is aided by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan relies significantly on imports to meet its energy demand. During FY25, the country consumed ~16.3mln MT of petroleum products (FY24: ~15.3mln MT), an uptick of ~7% YoY, primarily due to an increase in automobile sales. MS remained the volume leader with sales of ~7.6mln MT (FY24: ~7.14mln MT), followed by HSD (FY25: ~6.89mln MT, FY24: ~6.26mln MT). However, FO witnessed a sharp decline of ~23% (FY25: ~0.81mln MT, FY24: ~1.04mln MT).
The ratings of Be Energy Limited ('Be Energy' or 'the Company') drive comfort from a strong association with BE Group (‘the Group’), a Saudi Arabia-based conglomerate with a significant global footprint in energy-related businesses, including downstream oil operations across Asia and Africa. The presence of sponsors on the Board provides support to the governance framework. The Company generates ~61% of its revenue from sales of PMG, followed by HSD (~37%), while HSFO and Lubricants contribute ~2% to the topline. The Company had consistent revenue growth in the past; however, a shift in industry dynamics has resulted in a volume-driven decrease in revenue. The Company has strategically expanded its network to 532 retail outlets, distributed nationwide. Favorable gross margins, due to reduced international oil prices, along with increased hospitality income, support the Company’s bottom line. However, at the net level, margins remained squeezed. A key strategic initiative has been the licensing agreement with Chevron to operate under Caltex brand. Being a globally recognized brand, Caltex has enabled Be Energy to attract customers to the retail outlets. Currently, the Company operates 110 retail outlets under Caltex brand. This partnership has strengthened Be Energy’s positioning in a highly competitive market and is anticipated to further enhance brand visibility and performance in a competition that is expected to intensify in the future. The Company intends to open additional Caltex-branded stations to drive volumetric growth and improve financial outcomes. Be Energy maintains a strong financial profile, characterized by an adequate working capital cycle and disciplined leverage management. The sponsors’ strong business acumen continues to be a critical factor supporting the ratings.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on Be Energy’s ability to enhance its capacity utilization through infrastructure and supply chain development, in order to augment its market penetration and strengthen its relative position. Sustainability of bottom line and key financial metrics, in terms of working capital ratios, coverages, and leveraging, remains crucial to the rating.

Profile
Legal Structure

Be Energy Limited ('Be Energy' or the 'Company') was incorporated in Oct-1996 as a Private Limited Company and subsequently transformed its legal status to a Public Unlisted Company in Nov-2017.


Background

The Company had commenced its operations from Overseas Oil Trading Company (Pvt.) Limited ('Oil Trading') and Bakri Trading Company Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited ('Bakri Trading'). In 2016, the Company was granted permission to merge the Overseas Oil Trading Company with and into Bakri Trading. Post merger, Bakri Trading changed its name to Bakri Energy (Pvt.) Limited.


Operations

The Company specializes in the procurement, storage, distribution, and marketing of petroleum products and lubricants. The Company has a network of 532 retail outlets with a significant presence in Sindh and Punjab, while expanding in North Punjab. The Company has one of the largest oil storage infrastructures in the country, totaling approximately 231,725 MTs.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

A major shareholding of ~90.98% resides among Rawafid Investments LLC, followed by Energy Petroleum Consultant Company (~8.99%), and Directors (~0.03%). 


Stability

The Group business has been governed and administered by the members of Bakri Family, and they are in the process of preparing a succession plan for their business in the future. The second generation has been inducted into the business.


Business Acumen

Bakri Group was founded in 1973. Initially, the group provided bunkering services to calling and passing vessels. Soon, the group started trading in physical oil and oil products. The Bakri group then established companies that provided shipping, time charter services, shipping management, marine support, water treatment plant and other services. Bakri group continues to provide services in the Middle East, Sub- Indian, Africa, and the Far East with the ambition to cover the rest of the world.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of the sponsors is considered as good as the Company represents that sponsors have well-diversified profitable businesses.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Company lies with a five-member Board (BoD). which comprises three Non-Executive Directors, while there is one Executive and one Independent Director. Three members, including the CEO, are from the Sponsoring family.


Members’ Profile

Dr. Zohair Abdul Kader B AlBakri serves as the Chairman of the BoD. He holds directorships in various group companies, including but not limited to Rawafid Al Huqooq Industrial Co., Rawafid Al Hadara Holding Co., and Rawafid National Services Co. Mr. Shabab Saeed, an Independent Director, has an overall experience of more than three decades in the petroleum sector. He is currently the CEO of International Oil Co. Limited. All other Board members possess diversified experience and business acumen.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD is assisted by one committee, namely, the ‘Executive Committee’. This committee helps oversee the overall operations of the Company and guides management in developing effective operational and financial policies.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company, M/S RSM Avais Hyder Liaquat Nauman Chartered Accountants, have provided an unqualified opinion on the financial statements as of Dec-2024. The auditor is QCR rated and on SBP panel 'A' category of auditors. 


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's operations have been bifurcated into five broad functional areas comprising: i) Operations, supply chain & logistics, ii) Projects, iii) Marketing, iv) Finance, and v) Human Resources. All department heads report to the Managing Director (MD), who then reports to the CEO. The CEO reports to the BoD.


Management Team

Mr. M. Hani Abdul Kader B AlBakri has been recently appointed as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and has a diversified professional experience. Previously, Mr. Hussain Al Shammaa was the CEO of the Company. Mr. Qasim Zaheer maintains his role as Managing Director and briefs the CEO regarding the Company’s operations regularly. He has an overall experience of more than two decades and has served as the MD and CEO of TOTAL Oil Pakistan Limited and General Manager at PSO. He is assisted by a team of professionals. 


Effectiveness

To oversee the management of the Company, four committees have been formed, comprising various members of the management team. The committees include i) Procurement Committee, ii) Product Pricing Committee, iii) HR Committee, and iv) Marketing Support Team.


MIS

The Company’s operating environment relies on an IT infrastructure supported by ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) solutions. The software has been acquired from M/S Sidat Hyder. The IT infrastructure is effectively integrated with all the departments and ensures proper financial and operational control.


Control Environment

The Company’s dealer directly places orders on the online ordering sales system, after which orders are entered into the system, undergo a credit check by finance, and are then fulfilled by operations. Dealers and carriage contractors are responsible for safe product delivery once orders leave the Company’s storage facility.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan relies significantly on imports to meet its energy demand. During FY25, the country consumed ~16.3mln MT of petroleum products (FY24: ~15.3mln MT), an uptick of ~7% YoY. This uptick was primarily due to three reasons: higher demand following a reduction in HSD and MS prices, curtailment of smuggled oil products, and an increase in automobile sales. MS remained the volume leader with sales of ~7.6mln MT (FY24: ~7.14mln MT), an uptick of ~6%, followed by HSD (FY25: ~6.89mln MT, FY24: ~6.26mln MT), an uptick of ~10%. However, FO witnessed a sharp decline of ~23% (FY25: ~0.81mln MT, FY24: ~1.04mln MT). Currently, there are ~35 registered OMCs. There are five (5) listed OMCs operating in the country, namely (i) Pakistan State Oil (PSO), (ii) Shell Pakistan (SHELL), (iii) Hascol Petroleum (HASCOL), (iv) Hi-Tech Lubricants (HTL), and (v) Attock Petroleum (APL). Going forward, consumption of petroleum products is expected to follow the same trajectory.


Relative Position

Be Energy Limited has contributed to increased competition in the industry and is among the top ten companies in the OMC market. The top 5 OMC players hold ~79% market share in sales. Out of the remaining ~21% market share of other OMCs, Be Energy holds ~2.1% of the market share in sales.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue through sales of PMG (~60.7%), followed by HSD (~36.8%), HSFO (~2.1%), and Lubricants (~0.4%). During CY24, the Company sold ~361,618 MT in volumes and generated revenue of ~PKR 115.9bln. During 6MCY25, the Company sold ~179,102 MT in volumes (6MCY24: ~197,930 MT), a dip of ~9.5%, leading to a decline of ~13% in revenue, reported at ~PKR 55.6bln (6MCY24: ~PKR 64.1bln). Going forward, revenue is expected to increase as the Company plans to expand its network of retail outlets in Punjab and Sindh.  


Margins

During CY24, the Company reported a gross margin of ~2.8%, whereas the operating margin was reported at ~1%. On the net level, a minimal margin of ~0.3% was reported. During 6MCY25, the Company reported a gross margin of ~3.4% (6MCY24: ~2.5%), an uptick due to a decrease in international POL prices. The Company reported an operating margin of ~1.2% (6MCY24: ~0.8%), a trickle-down effect of an increase in gross margin. At the net level, the Company reported a profit margin of ~0.9% (6MCY24: ~0.1%), due to a decline of ~84% in finance cost along with an increase in other income. Going forward, margins are expected to follow a stable trend. 


Sustainability

Chevron Brands International LLC (Chevron), a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation, has entered into a long-term trademark licensing agreement with Be Energy Limited, marking the return of the Caltex brand to fuel retailing in Pakistan. All operations of Caltex-branded retail outlets will be managed by Be Energy. This will boost the Company's overall outlook.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of CY24, the Company reported inventory days at ~47 days, while reporting trade receivable days at ~4 days. The gross working days, therefore, were reported at ~51 days. Trade payable days as of CY24 were reported at ~40 days, resulting in net working capital days of ~11 days. As of 6MCY25, the Company reported inventory days of ~47 days (6MCY24: ~32 days). Trade receivable days reduced to ~4 days (6MCY24: ~5 days), indicating the Company's efficiency in collecting receivables. On the contrary, trade payable days increased to ~42 days (6MCY24: ~28 days), due to better credit terms from the supplier. On the net level, the Company reported net working capital days of ~8 days (6MCY24: ~8 days). Borrowing cushion remains stable. 


Coverages

During CY24, the Company reported FCFO of ~PKR 1,727mln, whereas total finance cost was reported at ~PKR 186mln. This led to an FCFO/Finance Cost cover of ~9.3x. During 6MCY25, the Company reported FCFO of ~PKR 951mln (6MCY24: ~PKR 311mln), a significant uptick of ~205% due to an increase in PBT by ~105%. Finance costs decreased by ~84%, reported at ~PKR 23mln (6MCY24: ~PKR 143mln), due to a reduction in policy rate. Resultantly, the Company reported a substantial uptick in FCFO/Finance Cost cover reported at ~40.8x (6MCY24: ~2.2x). Going forward, coverages are expected to remain stable. 


Capitalization

As of CY24, the Company reported total borrowings of ~PKR 1,014mln, whereas shareholders' equity stood at ~PKR 16,378mln. Hence, the leverage of the Company was reported at ~5.8%. As of 6MCY25, total borrowings of the Company witnessed a slight uptick, reported at ~PKR 87mln (6MCY24: ~PKR 86mln). The shareholders' equity witnessed an uptick of ~3% reported at ~PKR 16,886mln (6MCY24: ~PKR 16,387mln) due to an increase in accumulated profits. This resulted in stable leverage of ~0.5% (6MCY24: ~0.5%). Going forward, leverage is expected to remain stable. 


 
 

Aug-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
6M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
6M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 15,681 15,441 14,645 7,084
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 12,478 22,852 14,959 11,498
a. Inventories 9,525 18,845 10,705 6,820
b. Trade Receivables 1,337 1,070 1,493 2,885
5. Total Assets 28,160 38,292 29,604 18,582
6. Current Liabilities 8,601 18,285 8,097 5,274
a. Trade Payables 7,995 17,641 7,447 4,085
7. Borrowings 87 1,014 2,708 2,944
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2,585 2,615 2,475 765
10. Net Assets 16,886 16,378 16,324 9,599
11. Shareholders' Equity 16,886 16,378 16,324 9,599
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 55,618 115,892 67,075 111,779
a. Cost of Good Sold (53,706) (112,614) (65,421) (106,353)
2. Gross Profit 1,912 3,278 1,655 5,426
a. Operating Expenses (1,221) (2,129) (821) (1,566)
3. Operating Profit 691 1,149 833 3,860
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 219 258 57 (2,365)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 910 1,407 890 1,495
a. Total Finance Cost (35) (447) (159) (498)
b. Taxation (367) (626) (581) (717)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 508 335 150 281
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 951 1,727 658 851
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 923 1,370 505 656
c. Changes in Working Capital 4 2,366 (642) 371
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 927 3,736 (137) 1,027
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (602) (1,263) (245) (125)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (635) (1,600) 726 (1,500)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (310) 873 345 (599)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 73.3% 80.6% 20.0% 9.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 3.4% 2.8% 2.5% 4.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.9% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 1.7% 3.5% 0.0% 1.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.1% 2.0% 2.3% 2.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 50 51 30 40
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 8 11 14 21
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.5 1.2 1.8 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 53.2 13.2 9.6 4.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 40.8 9.3 5.8 1.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 0.5% 5.8% 14.2% 23.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 580.0 140.0 139.7 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.7% 16.4% 9.4% 21.1%

Aug-25

www.pacra.com

Aug-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-25

www.pacra.com