Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Aug-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
07-Aug-24 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

The Company was incorporated on January 31, 2008, as a private limited company. The principal activity of the Company is to run a dairy farm for the production and processing of milk and dairy products. It is a subsidiary of Diamond Fabrics Limited, which owns a majority stake (~53.755%) in the company. The rest of the shareholding lies with other group Companies. The governance structure includes five members, all belonging to the sponsoring group. Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah is the Chairman and Founder of the Sapphire Group of Companies. He has been honored twice with Pakistan’s top civilian award, Sitara-e-Imtiaz, for his contributions to business. All board members have had a long association with the group and bring extensive experience to their roles.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings for Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited (“the Company” or “SDPL”) reflects the prominent profile of its sponsoring group, the Sapphire Group, a renowned textile conglomerate in Pakistan. The group has appreciable business diversity in multiple industry segments, including Power, Cement, Real Estate, and Dairy. Sapphire Dairies is a strategic venture of the group, driven by the vision that corporate farms can enhance dairy economics and hygiene standards for the people of Pakistan and its investors. SDPL engages in the rearing and farming of dairy animals and has transformed into a fully vertically integrated dairy unit. The Company operates a state-of-the-art corporate dairy farm, equipped with a fully automated milk collection mechanism and real-time production status updates. The processing and packaging facility of processed Milk, Dairy, and Fruit beverages meets the high-end international quality standards. In terms of revenue contribution, SDPL’s core product remains raw milk, followed by dairy-based and fruit beverages, along with related offerings. During 9MFY25, the Company reported a topline of PKR 3.5bln (9MFY24: PKR 3.1bln; FY24: PKR 4.4bln), primarily driven by improved business volumes in processing, supported by stable raw milk prices over the past three quarters. Profitability was further supported by non-core income through revaluation gains on dairy livestock, an important lever in a fundamentally low-margin industry. SDPL has also initiated a strategic push into exports by dispatching multiple consignments of fruit beverages. Additionally, the Company’s adoption of advanced genetic improvement practices in dairy breeds has contributed to higher milk yields across its cattle base. Looking ahead, the Company plans to diversify its operations by entering the fattening business domain, expanding its footprint within the livestock value chain. The board of SDPL is more of an advisory nature, accompanied by professional management. The financial risk profile of the Company is considered adequate, with an aptly managed working capital cycle due to the perishable nature of the product. The cash flows and coverages of the Company are considered adequate. The Company maintained a moderately leveraged capital structure with short-term borrowing to fund working capital requirements, mainly dedicated to the procurement of feed. The dairy industry faces key challenges, including high sensitivity to raw milk pricing, feed availability, and the need for disciplined livestock and treasury management.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management’s ability to improve profitability, generate sufficient cash flows, and maintain coverages at an optimal level. The adherence to the debt matrix at an optimal level is a prerequisite for assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

The Sapphire Dairies (Pvt.) Limited ("the Company" or "SDPL") is a private limited company and registered under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (Repealed with the enactment of the Companies Act, 2017).


Background

SDPL was incorporated on January 31, 2008, as part of the sponsors' strategy to expand their footprint in the dairy sector to augment business diversity, with the vision that corporate farming can enhance dairy economics and hygiene standards.


Operations

SDPL's principal activity is the production and processing of milk and dairy products at its dairy farm, which is located on Manga Raiwind Road in District Kasur. The Company produced 14.8mln gross liters of milk in 9MFY25. At present, the farm has 2,000 lactating cows, which constitutes 45% of the total herd size. The head office/registered office is situated at 7 A-K, Main Boulevard, Gulberg, Lahore, facilitating streamlined production and distribution processes.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company is a subsidiary of Diamond Fabrics Limited, which owns a 53.75% stake in the Company. Additionally, Sapphire Textile Mills Limited and Sapphire Fibres Limited hold 12.946%  & 5.509% respectively. The rest of the shareholding lies with other group Companies.


Stability

The Company's onwership is expected to remain stable in the foreseeable future due to the Company's long-term association with the Sapphire Group. 


Business Acumen

The sponsors possess deep industry knowledge supported by an extensive experience across multiple sectors of the country's economy, including textiles, power, dairy, and retail. During the preceding years, the Company underwent several economic cycles but the growth remained intact. The sponsoring group continued to flourish under the strategic direction and visionary leadership of the sponsors.


Financial Strength

The financial strength of SDPL emerges from the robust financial muscle of the sponsors. During FY24, the group's annual turnover clocked at ~PKR 1.35bln USD, reflecting the sponsors strong finacial capacity to support the Company if needed. 


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises five members, all belonging to the sponsoring group. It functions primarily in an advisory capacity, supported by professional management. The inclusion of an independent director would further strengthen the Company’s governance framework.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah is the Chairman and Founder of the Sapphire Group of Companies. He has been honored twice with Pakistan’s top civilian award, Sitara-e-Imtiaz, for his contributions to business. All board members have had a long-standing association with the Group and bring extensive experience to their roles. Mr. Amer Abdullah holds an MBA degree from the United States. He joined the Group in 1990 and has served as a director in various group companies. He is currently serving as the CEO of Diamond Fabrics Limited and Sapphire Dairies (Private) Limited. Mr. Shahid Abdullah holds a bachelor's degree in commerce from the University of Karachi and has been associated with the Sapphire Group since 1980. He is serving as the CEO of Sapphire Fibres Limited, Amer Cotton Mills (Pvt.) Limited and Sapphire Electric Company Limited. Mr. Nadeem Abdullah graduated from McGill University, Canada. He has been the CEO of Sapphire Textile Mills Limited for the past 16 years and also serves as CEO of Sapphire Wind Power Company Limited. Mr. Yousuf Abdullah holds an MBA degree from the UK. He is the CEO of Sapphire Finishing Mills Limited and also serves on the boards of other group businesses. He became a director in various Sapphire Group Companies in 1995. Mr. Abdul Sattar Arain is a Fellow Member of ICAP and holds a Master’s degree in Commerce. He has been with the Sapphire Group of Companies since 1981 and has served in key managerial positions.


Board Effectiveness

No board committees have been established. Board meetings are conducted, and financial results are presented to the board for evaluation of the Company's performance. Minutes of meetings are recorded and maintained. The sponsors play an active executive role and provide guidance to management in the Company's operations.


Financial Transparency

M/s ShineWing Hameed Chaudhri & Co. Chartered Accountants serve as the external auditors for the Company. They have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial reports for the year ended June 30,2024.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure includes business units and shared services. The business units include SDL Farm and SDL Processing, which cumulatively manage calf care, feeding, health, parlor, breeding, production, quality control, and warehousing. Shared services support functions such as engineering, IT, accounts, MIS, HR, administration, internal audit, tax, supply chain, and finance.


Management Team

The management team at SDPL consists of seasoned professionals with diverse experience. Mr. Amer Abdullah serves as the Company's CEO, leading its strategic direction and having been instrumental in spearheading textile expansion projects and diversifying the dairy business. The Company's financial operations are overseen by Mr. Arslan Ahmad, Deputy General Manager of Accounts & Finance, while Mr. Faizan Elahi, the Business Unit Head since 2014, is responsible for leading operational strategies and growth initiatives.


Effectiveness

There are no management committees in place, and the management meets informally to discuss pertinent matters.


MIS

The Company implemented the SAP B1 system on January 17, 2018, in partnership with ABACUS. This enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution was adopted to streamline core business processes, improve financial management, and provide real-time insights for more informed decision-making. As per the agreement, the system is updated every December.


Control Environment

Foreign veterinary experts and comprehensive vaccination protocols are employed to uphold the health and vitality of the herd and prevent disease outbreaks. Environmental and nutritional management practices are implemented to ensure a stress-free environment and a nutritionally balanced diet for livestock. Herd size is carefully regulated in accordance with stocking density standards to ensure good care and to strive to keep mortality rates low. Optimizing breeding helps to ensure lactation yield remains within feasible levels for the farm.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan is the world's 3rd largest milk producer, with total production reaching 72.3mln MT in FY25. This is supported by a large total livestock population of 237.7mln. However, the country faces a major challenge in low productivity, as the average milk yield per cow, at just 12-14 liters per day, is significantly below international standards of 45-55 liters. The sector is dominated by loose milk, with the packaged industry holding a very small market share. This is primarily due to a fragmented supply chain, poor infrastructure, seasonal yield fluctuations, and consumer price sensitivity.


Relative Position

The Company owns a state-of-the-art dairy farm that adheres to international standards, maintaining a herd size of over ~ 4479 cows which reflects its good position in the market.


Revenues

The Company's revenues have shown a consistent upward trajectory over the years. In FY24, the Company's net revenue surged to PKR 4.4bln, reflecting a 32% increase from PKR 3.4bln in FY23. This growth is primarily driven by the Company's diverse portfolio of dairy products, including skimmed milk, raw cream, and cheese, among others. Nestle Pakistan Limited remains the Company's primary customer. At the inception of FY25, SDPL commenced the export of its fruit drink. During 9MFY25, the revenue of the Company was recorded at PKR 3.5bln, including export revenue of PKR 41mln.


Margins

The Company's gross profit margin slightly improved, reaching 8.7% in 9MFY25 (9MFY24: 7.6%; FY24: 7.2%). This enhancement in profitability is primarily attributed to a reduction in energy and  feed costs. Consequently, these factors also supported enhanced net profitability, with the net profit margin strengthening to 3.1% compared to 1.1% in 9MFY24.


Sustainability

The Management remains focused on aligning performance with financial projections through strategic initiatives. These include adopting advanced genetic improvement practices for dairy breeds, enhancing milk yield across the herd, and initiating a fattening farm project. Following a successful trial with 23 animals yielding a net profit of PKR 1.6mln through local sales, the fattening farm will now focus exclusively on exports. Furthermore, having commenced exports in FY25, the Company has diversified into international markets with juices and traditional ghee, and will commence exports to China soon.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's net cash cycle has consistently exhibited a negative trajectory, which is a reflection of its efficient working capital management and rapid inventory turnover. This favorable trend, however, experienced a reversal in 9MFY25, with the net working capital days turning positive at 3 days (from -8 days in FY24). This shift is primarily attributable to an increase in trade receivable days from 11 to 17 days and a reduction in trade payable days from 22 to 16 days over the period. The Company effectively manages its working capital requirements by utilizing a mix of internal cash flows and short-term borrowings.


Coverages

The Company's shortfall in core income has led to a depletion in its FCFO and coverage metrics. FCFO improved from PKR 178mln to PKR 298mln in FY24 and dropped to PKR 180mln in 9MFY25. Similarly, the Company's coverage ratios showed a minute improvement, with the interest coverage ratio rising to 0.9x from a concerning 0.8x in FY23. However, in 9MFY25, the interest coverage ratio turned back to 0.8x.


Capitalization

The Company maintained a moderately leveraged capital structure, with its leverage ratio increasing to 41.1% as of 9MFY25 (from 35.8% in FY24). This was primarily due to an increase in total borrowings to PKR 2.7bln, which included PKR 1.4 bln in short-term and PKR 0.9 bln in long-term debt. The Company's equity base was reported at PKR 3.9bln, with unappropriated profits making up PKR 2.0bln of that total. The sustainability of this equity base relative to the Company's debt remains a significant factor.


 
 

Aug-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 5,403 5,244 5,102 4,913
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,067 1,620 1,375 928
a. Inventories 15 29 36 34
b. Trade Receivables 228 201 76 45
5. Total Assets 7,470 6,864 6,477 5,840
6. Current Liabilities 404 525 522 591
a. Trade Payables 128 272 261 387
7. Borrowings 2,748 2,141 1,916 1,416
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 375 366 288 377
10. Net Assets 3,943 3,832 3,750 3,457
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,943 3,832 3,750 3,457
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 3,517 4,491 3,401 2,573
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,210) (4,170) (3,297) (2,795)
2. Gross Profit 307 321 104 (222)
a. Operating Expenses (212) (83) (65) (281)
3. Operating Profit 95 239 40 (503)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 279 299 473 2,081
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 375 538 513 1,578
a. Total Finance Cost (220) (323) (216) (174)
b. Taxation (44) (124) (3) (84)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 110 90 295 1,320
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 180 298 178 (362)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (50) (9) (22) (520)
c. Changes in Working Capital (540) (247) (705) 4
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (591) (256) (726) (516)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 8 57 124 992
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 594 216 501 (370)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 11 17 (102) 105
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 4.4% 32.1% 32.2% 0.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 8.7% 7.2% 3.1% -8.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.1% 2.0% 8.7% 51.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -10.3% 1.1% -15.5% -13.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.8% 2.4% 8.2% 38.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 18 14 11 11
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 3 -8 -24 -44
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 5.1 3.1 2.6 1.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.1 1.1 1.0 -2.0
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.4 0.6 0.5 -0.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -23.6 -49.5 -30.8 -2.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 41.1% 35.8% 33.8% 29.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 77.6 81.6 103.9 95.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.8% 14.9% 12.9% 12.3%

Aug-25

www.pacra.com

Aug-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-25

www.pacra.com