Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Sep-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
26-Sep-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
26-Sep-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
30-Sep-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
01-Oct-21 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Master Group, with a legacy of over 50 years, diversified from its flagship foam business into multiple sectors including textiles, engineering, automobiles, and retail. Master Wind Energy Limited (MWEL), incorporated in 2005, operates a 52.8MW wind farm in Jhimpir, Sindh. The project cost amounted to USD 132.3mln, of which 75% (USD 99.2mln) was financed equally by local and foreign lenders. To date, around 80% of the project debt has been repaid. Its Board comprises eight members, with majority representation from the Master Group, and is led by Mr. Shahzad Malik, Managing Director since 2011, supported by an experienced management team.

Rating Rationale

Master Wind Energy Limited (MWEL) operates a 52.8MW wind power project in the Jhimpir Wind Corridor, Sindh, marking the Master Group’s first venture into the energy sector. The ratings are underpinned by a regulated framework that ensures revenue certainty through guaranteed returns, cost indexation, and a pass-through tariff mechanism. Under this regime, if MWEL maintains contractual availability and is ready to supply power, the power purchaser is obligated to pay the full tariff even in the case of curtailed dispatches. Receivables are further secured by the Government of Pakistan’s sovereign guarantee on CPPA-G’s obligations. The Company remains exposed to two principal risks. The first is wind risk, as fluctuations in wind speeds directly affect generation and cash flows. In the past, disturbances in wind patterns have led to lower generation compared to benchmarks; nonetheless, the plant has remained profitable, meeting its financial obligations in a timely manner. Improved wind conditions are expected to normalize generation patterns going forward. The second risk relates to operations, mitigated by the engagement of General Electric International Inc. as the O&M operator, leveraging its international expertise and local market experience. In FY25, MWEL generated 95.376 GWh of electricity compared to 127.366 GWh in FY24, reflecting a decline of 25% year-on-year. Consequently, revenue contracted to PKR 4,189mln (FY24: PKR 6,115mln). The contraction stemmed from normalization of inflation and exchange rate stability, which reduced indexation adjustments, along with softer demand, lower NPMV, and delayed interest payments. Despite this, the Company continues to meet its working capital requirements through internally generated cash flows and has not availed external working capital lines. Its liquidity profile remains adequate, as evidenced by the repayment of ~80% of project debt without utilizing the forbearance period, reflecting sound financial discipline and cash flow management.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain operational performance in line with contractual benchmarks, sustain prudent financial metrics, and ensure timely debt repayments. External factors, including ongoing power sector reforms, potential regulatory changes, and any deterioration in the financial risk profile, also remain key considerations, the outcomes of which are yet to unfold.

Profile
Plant

Master Wind Energy Limited (“MWEL”) was incorporated in Pakistan on May 03, 2005, and converted into a public limited company on July 01, 2011. The Company operates a wind power plant at Jhimpir, District Thatta, Sindh, on land leased from the Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB), Government of Pakistan. This project marks the Master Group’s first venture into the energy sector. The plant was initially commissioned with an installed capacity of 49.5 MW, which was later enhanced to 52.8 MW through software upgradation.


Tariff

The project is being developed under the Upfront Tariff Regime announced by the Government in 2013. Under this framework, the feed-in tariff, along with permitted indexations and escalations, will remain applicable throughout the 20-year concession period from the date of commercial operations. The concession is backed by sovereign guarantees provided by the Government of Pakistan through the Energy Purchase Agreement and the Implementation Agreement. As per NEPRA’s 2013 tariff determination for wind IPPs, MWEL was awarded a levelized tariff of US¢15.1088 (PKR 14.7462) per kWh for years 1–20. The current applicable tariff, as per NEPRA for July to September FY25, stands at PKR 40.9632 per kWh.


Return on Project

The IRR of the project, as agreed with NEPRA, is 17%


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Master Group. The Group is jointly owned by three brothers, with shareholding distributed among their families either directly or through special purpose vehicles (SPVs). In MWEL, individual shareholders hold 36.33%, while associated companies collectively hold 63.67%. The associated companies include N.M. Holding Ltd. (16.33%), Najeeb Holdings Ltd. (17.33%), Procon Engineering Ltd. (15%), and Master Textile Mills Ltd. (15%).


Stability

Stability in IPPs is anchored in the long-term agreements signed with the power purchaser. The Company further benefits from a stable ownership profile, being wholly owned by the Master Group, with shareholding distributed among the sponsoring families through direct and associated company holdings. This structure is expected to remain unchanged, reflecting the sponsors’ sustained commitment to the Company. Reinforcing their presence in the energy sector, the sponsors have also established another venture under the name Master Green Energy.


Business Acumen

The sponsor group demonstrates strong business acumen with significant experience across diverse sectors, including foam products, chemicals, textiles, engineering, wind power, home fashion, automobiles, and real estate. In the automobile sector, the Group owns Master Motors Limited, engaged in the assembly, manufacturing, and distribution of commercial and passenger vehicles in Pakistan through collaborations with renowned international brands. In real estate, the Group has launched IMM REIT Management Company Limited, which is primarily focused on residential developments. This diversified portfolio underscores the sponsors’ ability to manage complex and large-scale businesses and reflects their long-term commitment to the Company.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of Master Wind Energy Limited possess strong financial standing, supported by the diversified and well-established profile of the Master Group. The Group has a longstanding market presence, stable earnings, and a proven track record of growth, which underpin its capacity to extend financial and operational support to the Company when required.


Governance
Board Structure

MWEL’s BoD comprises eight members, including the Chairman and Managing Director. Of these, three are executive directors, three are non-executive directors, and two are independent directors. Five board members represent the Master Group, and the Board also includes one female director in line with governance requirements. While the Company is not listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX), its Board is fully compliant with the Code of Corporate Governance.


Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Mr. Naveed Malik, who brings nearly four decades of experience with the Master Group, having held senior leadership positions across its businesses. The Board also includes Mr. Najeeb Malik, Managing Director of Master Textile Mills Limited, with around three decades of experience and deep involvement in the Group’s companies, and Mr. Nadeem Malik, Managing Director of Procon Engineering and Master Motor Corporation, who contributes over 30 years of expertise in the engineering and automobile sectors. Mr. Shahzad Malik, Managing Director of MWEL and also leading Dura Industries and Master Green Energy, has approximately 15 years of experience in both the foam and power sectors, reflecting the Group’s diversification into energy. Day-to-day operations are further supported by Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, Director and Chief Operating Officer of MWEL, has long association with the Compnay and brings extensive expertise in the power sector. Independent oversight is provided by Mr. Aamir Fayyaz Shaikh, a businessman with experience in textiles, and Mr. Shahab A. Khawaja, a former government official, both serving as independent directors for the past 6 years. Female representation is ensured through Ms. Natalia Malik, a businesswoman and sponsor family representative.


Board Effectiveness

The diverse experience of the Board members will play a pivotal role in guiding management toward the development of effective operational and financial policies. Their collective expertise, combining long-standing sponsor leadership with independent oversight, provides strategic direction and strengthens governance to the Company


Financial Transparency

A.F. Ferguson & Co., Chartered Accountants, is the external auditor of the Company. The auditor issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 2024, indicating a true and fair view of the financial position. The statutory audit for FY25 is currently in process.


Management
Organizational Structure

MWEL follows a lean organizational structure, with management primarily focused on financial and administrative functions. The operations and maintenance of the plant are outsourced to General Electric International Inc. Ltd. under a long-term O&M contract, ensuring operational efficiency and reliability.


Management Team

Mr. Shahzad Malik, Managing Director of MWEL, leads the Company with direct reporting to the Board, bringing strong Group-level experience and strategic oversight. He is supported by Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, Chief Operating Officer, who has nearly two decades of professional experience, including a decade with MWEL and six years as COO, contributing sector-specific expertise in power and finance. Plant operations are overseen by Mr. Syed Shahzad Ali, General Manager, who has over two decades of industry experience and nine years with MWEL, and is responsible for coordinating with General Electric International Inc. Ltd. under the O&M contract. Collectively, the management team demonstrates stability, technical competence, and the capability to ensure effective operations within a lean organizational framework.


Effectiveness

The Company’s management demonstrates efficiency through a structured and systematic decision-making process that has contributed to consistent operational outcomes. The team not only provides strategic oversight but also ensures knowledge transfer and capacity building at the plant level by maintaining a dedicated engineering staff. Regular bi-weekly and monthly coordination meetings with GE’s O&M personnel further strengthen technical expertise and operational reliability. This approach reflects management’s commitment to continuous improvement, efficient resource utilization, and long-term sustainability of plant operations.


Control Environment

The Company maintains a sound control environment, supported by an efficient Management Information System (MIS). The MIS provides real-time plant production data, allowing management to closely monitor operations and make timely, informed decisions. This strengthens transparency, facilitates accountability, and ensures effective oversight of day-to-day performance. Beyond MIS, the Company’s lean organizational structure, clear reporting lines, and regular coordination with the O&M contractor further reinforce operational discipline and risk management. Collectively, these practices contribute to a robust control framework, enhancing both efficiency and governance.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

MWEL operates under the framework of the Renewable Energy Policy 2006. In line with this policy, the Company achieved its COD in October 2016 and executed a 20-year Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with the Central Power Purchasing Agency (Guarantee) Limited [CPPA-G]. Under this agreement, all electricity generated is supplied to the national grid. The EPA remains effective until October 2036, providing long-term revenue visibility and stability by securing the Company’s off-take arrangements for the entire concession period. Under the EPA, the Company is required to generate electricity in line with the benchmark generation while maintaining the required efficiency. Any decline in generation due to efficiency shortfalls is not compensated by the power purchaser. However, in the event of curtailment of offtake by CPPA-G, the Company is compensated for the missed volumes, referred to as Non-Project Missed Volumes (NPMV).


Operation and Maintenance

For the initial two years of operations, the O&M services were provided by Zhejiang Huadong Engineering Science & Technology Development Company Ltd., under sub-operation by General Electric (GE). Subsequently, the O&M contract was transitioned to General Electric International Inc., which continues to manage the plant’s operations and maintenance. Under the terms of the contract, GE is responsible for ensuring the efficient performance of the plant. Any decline in generation arising from plant inefficiencies is subject to liquidated damages (LD), which are charged to GE.


Resource Risk

The Company’s revenues are subject to seasonality due to variations in wind speeds, with higher generation typically observed during the March–September period. Resource variability risk, unique to renewable energy IPPs, arises from their reliance on wind as a key resource, making them inherently exposed to wind risk. Under the Upfront Tariff Regime and the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, the Company fully absorbs the risk associated with wind variability. Consequently, the Company’s revenues and cash flows are directly affected by wind speed variations, which impact electricity generation and may result in fluctuations in cash flows. However, as per the Energy Purchase Agreement, if the plant remains available at its contracted capacity and is ready to deliver electricity, CPPA-G is obligated to pay the full tariff irrespective of actual offtake. This arrangement mitigates demand-side risk while providing revenue protection.


Insurance Cover

The Company has sound insurance coverage for property damage and business interruption. The insured values for damages include a property damage cover (up to PKR 0.7bln) & business interruption cover (up to PKR 3bln).


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

The power sector in Pakistan, with an installed capacity of 46,605 MW and total generation of 127,523 GWh in FY25, remains dominated by thermal (46%), hydro (31%), and nuclear (18%) sources. Renewables—including wind, solar, and biomass—currently account for about 5% of grid-based capacity (limited to IPPs, excluding captive and self-owned solar/wind generation). The government, however, aims to raise this share to 30% by 2030 under supportive frameworks such as the Alternative Energy Policy 2019 and the Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan (IGCEP 2047), which emphasize competitive bidding, grid modernization, and diversification of the energy mix to reduce reliance on imported fuels. Despite these policy efforts, new investment in the power sector has slowed, with most recent capacity additions concentrated in hydropower projects. At the same time, rooftop solar has gained strong momentum. Between 2022 and 2024, net-metered capacity increased from just over 300 MW to nearly 2,813 MW, with more than 280,000 households registered. This rapid expansion has been driven by rising grid tariffs, declining solar equipment costs, and greater adoption of net metering. While the trend has improved energy access and contributed to the renewable transition, most of this generation is self-consumed rather than fed into the grid. Consequently, demand for grid-based electricity has weakened, leaving fixed network costs to be spread over a smaller consumer base. Combined with underutilized installed capacity and persistent circular debt, this has contributed to rising per-unit electricity costs. A more balanced, system-wide approach is required to align distributed generation growth with the financial sustainability of the sector. Policy responses are evolving. The government is considering revisions to the net-metering buyback rate and has already imposed a 10% import tax on solar panels to manage sectoral imbalances and fiscal pressures. At the structural level, reforms are underway to curb circular debt and enhance efficiency through the Competitive Trading Bilateral Contract Market (CTBCM), which will enable large consumers to procure electricity directly from generators—promoting competition, improving price discovery, and supporting renewable integration into the national grid.


Generation

In FY25, the Company’s generation declined to 95.376 GWh (FY24: 127.366 GWh), impacted by weaker wind speeds, curtailments, and subdued demand. Revenue contracted by 31% to PKR 4,189mln (FY24: PKR 6,115mln), including NPMV of PKR 538mln (FY24: PKR 1,873mln). The decline was primarily driven by curtailments (13 GWh vs. 42 GWh in FY24), a lower late payment surcharge (PKR 167mln vs. PKR 429mln), easing inflation that reduced indexation adjustments, along with the modest reduction in generation.


Performance Benchmark

Under the EPA, MWEL is required to maintain a plant availability of 95%. During FY25, average availability remained high at 98.71%, in line with agreed parameters. However, electricity generation stood at 95.376 GWh against the benchmark generation of 142 GWh, resulting in an capacity factor of 22% (benchmark: 32%).


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

Debt financing constitutes 75% of the project cost, totaling USD 99.2mln, sourced equally from local and foreign financial institutions. A long-term facility of USD 49.6mln was obtained from the International Development Finance Corporation ('IDFC'), United States of America (USA) formally known as (Overseas Private Investment Corporation -OPIC), while local debt of PKR 5,456mln was provided by a consortium of banks comprising Meezan Bank Limited, Bank Al Habib Limited, Bank of Punjab, and Habib Metropolitan Bank. over 80% of both local and foreign debt has been repaid to date.


Liquidity Profile

MWEL receives payments under the EPA for electricity it is capable of generating, protecting the Company from demand-side risk even if CPPA-G requires no additional electricity. However, payments are not made if the plant is unavailable or unable to generate, making cash flows partially exposed to operational risk and seasonal variations in wind speed. As of FY25, the Company has no investment book nor short-term working capital liabilities, reducing liquidity risk. Interest coverage remains strong 5.2x in FY25 (FY24: 4.9x) ensuring financial stability. The Company has a strong equity base, and consistent dividend payments highlight its healthy liquidity position.


Working Capital Financing

MWEL operates with minimal reliance on working capital lines, meeting its operational requirements primarily through internal cash generation, and has not utilized any short-term borrowings to date. Payments from CPPA-G are due within 30 days, and trade receivables are secured by a government guarantee under the Implementation Agreement, with markup on delayed payments at 3M KIBOR plus 4.5% per annum. In FY25, net cash cycle days increased to 255 (FY24: 204), largely due to delayed collections arising from the circular debt issue in the power sector. Receivable days rose to 279 (FY24: 218), reflecting payment delays from CPPA-G. The company holds no inventory, so gross working capital days are entirely driven by receivables, resulting in minimal working capital requirements and eliminating the need for short-term borrowings. On the liability side, MWEL has limited trade creditors, with payments confined to O&M and general office expenses, resulting in short payable days of 24 in FY25 (FY24: 13), underscoring a conservative, cash-driven working capital management approach.


Cash Flow Analysis

During FY25, MWEL generated a Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) of PKR 3,238mln, down from PKR 5,242mln in FY24, primarily due to lower gross profit (FY25: PKR 2,236mln vs. FY24: PKR 4,179mln) resulting from reduced NPMV and lower wind speeds, which led to efficiency below benchmark levels. Cash at bank stood at PKR 3,147mln (FY24: PKR 3,057mln), while the Current Maturity of Long-Term Debt (CMLTD) was PKR 2,663mln (FY24: PKR 2,423mln), reflecting a coverage ratio of 0.9x (FY24: 1.5x). With the majority of project debt repaid and no significant long-term CAPEX required, the Company has minimal financial obligations and maintained consistent dividend payments of PKR 1,200mln (FY24: PKR 1,213mln), underscoring sound cashflow position.


Capitalization

During FY25, the company’s leverage decreased to 21.9% from 32.4% in FY24, driven by repayments of project-related loans. The company has not utilized any additional long-term loans, and the debt on the balance sheet reflects only the remaining project-related financing.


 
 

Sep-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,081 11,874 12,941
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 6,175 7,239 6,680
a. Inventories 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 2,673 3,721 3,568
5. Total Assets 17,256 19,113 19,620
6. Current Liabilities 633 653 665
a. Trade Payables 338 205 246
7. Borrowings 3,648 5,988 8,382
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 3 1 0
10. Net Assets 12,972 12,471 10,574
11. Shareholders' Equity 12,972 12,471 10,574
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,190 6,116 4,286
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,954) (1,937) (1,681)
2. Gross Profit 2,236 4,179 2,606
a. Operating Expenses (119) (91) (88)
3. Operating Profit 2,116 4,088 2,517
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 272 182 864
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,389 4,270 3,381
a. Total Finance Cost (619) (1,072) (1,087)
b. Taxation (69) (88) (46)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,701 3,111 2,248
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,238 5,242 3,461
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,593 4,162 2,481
c. Changes in Working Capital 1,207 (311) (52)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 3,800 3,852 2,429
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (100) (52) 23
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (3,610) (3,573) (2,112)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 90 226 340
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -31.5% 42.7% 4.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 53.4% 68.3% 60.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 40.6% 50.9% 52.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 106.1% 80.6% 79.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.4% 24.6% 22.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 279 218 294
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 255 204 277
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 9.8 11.1 10.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.2 4.9 3.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.0 1.5 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.4 1.4 3.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 21.9% 32.4% 44.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 29.3 37.7 51.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.9% 14.1% 12.1%

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-25

www.pacra.com