Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
15-Oct-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
15-Oct-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
16-Oct-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
21-Oct-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Oct-21 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited, a public limited company incorporated in 2010, is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and sale of mild steel products related to ferrous segments. In addition to its core ferrous operations, the Company also operates in the non-ferrous segment, focusing on the production and sale of copper products. Mughal operates with a melting capacity of 590,000M.T., rerolling capacity of 630,000M.T., and non-ferrous recycling capacity of 90,000M.T. Currently, a nine-member BoD is monitoring the overall functioning under the chairmanship of Mr. Mirza Javed Iqbal. Mr. Khurram Javaid serves as the CEO and is the driving force behind the Company. The senior management team has also been associated with the Company for a considerable period of time.

Rating Rationale

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited (“Mughal” or “the Company”) is a prominent player in the steel industry. The Company continues to withstand the pressures that have weighed other famous players in the sector. During FY25, macroeconomic indicators showed signs of improvement, with easing inflation and declining policy rates supporting a gradual recovery in economic activity. This contributed to a modest pick-up in the construction sector, which is expected to maintain positive momentum in the near term. The steel sector, however, is recovering more slowly compared with other construction-related industries. Key challenges include high dependence on imported raw materials with limited local substitutes, high energy intensity coupled with elevated power tariffs, and significant financing burdens. The sector is also lagging in reducing power tariffs, which remain a major component of total cost, while regulatory changes further weigh on the industry, keeping the outlook challenging. Nevertheless, with interest rates easing to around 11.0% by end-June 2025 (from nearly 22.0% at end-FY24), profitability across the sector is expected to improve, although the pace of recovery will remain contingent on demand drivers as well as trends in raw material prices and energy costs. In addition to the modest pick-up in the construction sector, Mughal Steel’s market share has improved, benefiting from the availability of capacity from other players operating at limited levels due to their own challenges. Despite high operational costs, regulatory changes, and significant financing burdens, Mughal has managed to maintain resilience. The Company’s distribution network has an extensive reach across the country, ensuring broad market access. The Company’s non-ferrous segment, which has historically contributed over 20% of revenues through exports, underwent a slight strategic scale-down in FY25 due to operational and regulatory constraints, while refocusing on meeting ferrous demand in the market. As a result of the change in sales mix and the reduction in export volumes, overall top-line declined to PKR 89.479bln in FY25 from PKR 92.383bln in FY24, with margins contracting accordingly. Net margins also faced pressure, with a major portion of the impact arising from finance costs and taxation, although the Company’s leverage ratio improved to ~48% in FY25 from 57.6% FY24. Working capital is funded through internal cash generation. To support additional funding requirements, the Company has also relied on banking facilities and debt instruments. Profitability is projected to strengthen on two fronts: firstly, through the commissioning of the alternative energy channel, Mughal Energy, in which the Company has invested. This initiative, expected to become operational in the coming months, will provide a structural reduction in operational costs; and secondly, the continuous decline in the policy rate is expected to lower finance costs and provide further support to margins.

Key Rating Drivers

In line with gradual improvements in the industry, the ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to maintain its sound business profile. The successful commissioning of the BMR project, along with the upcoming Mughal Energy initiative, is expected to enhance production performance, operational efficiency, and cost management. Improvement in the Company’s financial matrix and timely debt repayment remain important considerations.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mughal Iron & Steel Industries Limited was incorporated in Pakistan as a public limited company in 2010. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of steel products, along with non-ferrous products such as copper and aluminium. In 2011, the Company took over the running business of a partnership concern by the name of “Mughal Steel” which had been in the steel business for over 60 years and was being run by the major sponsors of the Company. The Company was listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange in March 2015 where its shares are traded under the Engineering sector.


Background

MISIL traces its roots to Mughal Steel, a partnership concern established over six decades ago and managed by the Company’s major sponsors. In 2010, the business was restructured and incorporated as a public limited company to achieve better governance, transparency, and growth prospects. The Company was subsequently listed on the PSX in March 2015 under the Engineering sector. Over the years, MISIL has evolved into a fully integrated manufacturer in the ferrous segment, producing a wide range of steel products, while also diversifying into non-ferrous offerings such as copper and aluminum. The registered head office is located in Lahore, with the manufacturing facility at 17 KM Sheikhupura Road, Kot Abdul Malik. The Company primarily caters to the domestic housing sector (urban and rural), large infrastructure projects, and the international market for non-ferrous products.


Operations

MISIL’s operations comprise two segments: ferrous and non-ferrous. The ferrous segment is the principal line of business and contributes the majority of revenues. Over time, the Company has developed a broad product portfolio within this segment, including billets, girders, T-Iron, rebars, and other steel products, enabling it to serve the diverse needs of the housing, industrial, and infrastructure sectors. The non-ferrous segment, though relatively smaller in scale, primarily comprises copper and aluminum ingots. Strong export proceeds, from non ferrous segment, particularly from sales to China, enhance MISIL’s overall profitability and provide a competitive edge by diversifying revenue streams beyond the domestic market.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Sponsor family holds a controlling stake (around ~75.3%) with the remaining ownership distributed among financial institutions and the general public. As of June 30, 2025, the Company’s ordinary shareholding was concentrated with Directors/CEO & family (43.20%) and Associated Companies/related parties (32.16%), while Banks/DFIs/NBFIs held 5.16% and the General Public 7.91%. On June 17, 2025, the company further issued 33,062,447 Ordinary Class-C shares through a rights issue. 


Stability

The ownership structure of MISIL is regarded as stable, with majority shareholding vested in the Mughal family. As the founding sponsors have a longstanding association with the steel business and their sustained commitment significantly reduces the likelihood of any ownership changes in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

With over six decades in the business, the sponsoring Mughal family demonstrates extensive experience in the steel and allied industries. Their longstanding presence reflects both resilience and strong market knowledge, positioning them as one of the key players in the sector.


Financial Strength

The financial health of the Company is considered adequate, underpinned by sponsor support. The owners not only provide strategic direction in line with the evolving business environment but have also demonstrated their commitment by injecting funds on an as-and-when-required basis.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board consists of nine members, six of whom belong to the sponsoring family, including the Chairman, Mr. Mirza Javed Iqbal, and the CEO. The remaining three are independent directors.


Members’ Profile

The Board comprises members with the requisite skills, competence, knowledge, and experience necessary for effective oversight. Mr. Javed Iqbal has nearly four decades of extensive experience in the local steel industry. Alongside the directors representing the sponsoring family, the presence of independent directors, Mr. Shoaib Ahmed Khan and Mr. Abdul Rehman Qureshi further strengthens the Company’s governance framework. Collectively, the Board members bring diverse expertise, key competencies, and have each completed more than one three-year term.


Board Effectiveness

The company has three board committees: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) HR & Remuneration Committee and (iii) Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) committee, each committee including an independent director as required by the SECP Code of Corporate Governance. Overall, board members’ attendance has been satisfactory. Furthermore, the inclusion of independent directors strengthens governance by ensuring impartial oversight and safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders. Additionally, the presence of a female board member adds diversity and is in alignment with best corporate governance practices.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external auditors, M/s. Fazal Mahmood & Co. and M/s. Muniff Ziauddin & Co., expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company follows a streamlined organizational structure with clear roles and significant delegation. The organogram is divided between the CFO and COO, with departments reporting accordingly, while executive directors and the CEO report to the Board. This structure supports effective decision-making and operational efficiency.


Management Team

Mr. Khurram Javed, the CEO, has over a decade of professional experience and holds an MBA from Coventry University. He has enhanced the Company’s HR quality by inducting professionals across diverse fields and also serves as CEO of four group companies: Mughal Energy Limited, Mughal Steel Re-Rolling Industries Limited, Mughal International IMPEX Limited, and Indus Engineering (Pvt.) Limited. He is supported by a skilled and experienced management team. The team also includes Mr. Shakeel Ahmad, Chief Operating Officer, who brings over a decade of experience in strategic market positioning, sales growth, and brand development. Supporting him is Mr. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal, Chief Financial Officer, a Fellow Member of ICAP with extensive expertise in finance, taxation, and strategic planning. 


Effectiveness

Mughal does not have formal management committees; instead, departmental heads hold regular meetings to review key performance areas and report to their respective executive directors.


MIS

MIS reports are prepared and customized as per management’s requirements on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis, covering areas such as re-ordering sheets and financial facilities status.


Control Environment

The Company has an ERP system in place which is currently being used for reporting purposes.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During FY25, Pakistan’s long steel (rebar) sector demonstrated resilience despite a medium-to-high business risk profile driven by cyclicality, imported scrap reliance, and elevated energy costs. Annual demand remained steady at around 4–5 million tons, supported by ongoing housing construction and small-scale development activity. The Federal and Punjab governments’ sizeable allocations under the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) are expected to stimulate infrastructure-related steel demand in the near term. Meanwhile, the copper segment faced headwinds amid global trade disruptions, particularly due to renewed U.S.–China tariff tensions and regulatory shifts affecting scrap availability. Locally, changes in Pakistan’s Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) influenced copper export flows. With interest rates easing to around 11% by end-FY25 (from ~22% in FY24), profitability in both steel and copper operations is expected to gradually improve, contingent on stable demand and manageable input costs.


Relative Position

MISIL ranks among the leading long steel manufacturers in Pakistan. The Company benefits from a well-established brand, extensive dealer network, and diversified product portfolio encompassing billets, rebar, and non-ferrous ingots. This diversification supports stable demand across market segments and enhances resilience against cyclical variations. Consistent operational performance, coupled with a sustained focus on quality and efficiency, underpins MISIL’s strong position within the domestic steel industry.


Revenues

For the nine months ended March 31, 2025, the Company reported gross sales of Rs. 75,704.9 million (9MFY24: Rs. 76,487.2 million) with net profit of Rs. 453.0 million (FY24 Sales: Rs. 92.4 billion). Net external sales from the ferrous segment rose by 7% on higher volumes, while non-ferrous sales declined by 23%. This shift reflects the Company’s strategic focus on ferrous operations amid regulatory and operational challenges in the non-ferrous segment. Ferrous margins showed slight improvement, non-ferrous margins remained stable, but overall margins fell due to the change in sales mix.


Margins

During 3QFY25, Mughal's gross and operating margins observed a slight improvement as compared to FY24, but declined when compared to previous periods as per reported figures (Gross: 3QFY25:8.9%, 3QFY24: 9.6%, 3QFY23: 13.6%; FY24: 8.4%) & (Operating: 3QFY25: 7.6%, 3QFY24:8.5%, 3QFY23: 12.3%; FY24: 7.2%). However, the Net Profit Margin observed a dip compared to FY24 as per reported figures, (Net: 3QFY25: 0.7%, 3QFY24: 2.1%, 3QFY23: 5.5%; FY24:2.2%) mainly due to slight decrease in gross margins and high finance cost.


Sustainability

MISIL demonstrates a growing commitment to sustainability through operational efficiency, responsible sourcing, and energy conservation. Its production facilities operate on Electric Induction Furnaces and Direct Rolling Technology, significantly reducing thermal energy usage, complemented by European-origin energy-efficient rolling mills and automated load management systems. The Company also utilizes a water treatment plant to recycle process water, reducing freshwater dependency. Supply chain sustainability is supported through the use of verified recycled steel scrap and a shift toward rail-based scrap transportation to minimize logistics emissions. Additionally, MISIL’s circular production model—converting steel scrap into finished products—positions it as a low-carbon steel producer. Ongoing exploration of renewable energy solutions further reinforces long-term operational and environmental resilience.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During 3QFY25, Mughal’s net working capital cycle stood at 124 days, compared to 118 days at end-Jun’24 and 145 days at end-Jun’23. Inventory days improved to 84 (FY24: 86; FY23: 112), reflecting better stock management. Receivable days, however, increased to 53 (FY24: 40; FY23: 40) due to higher local ferrous sales and stronger quarter-end dispatches, while payable days rose to 13 (FY24: 8; FY23: 7). The shift in working capital dynamics was largely attributed to expanded ferrous operations and a strategic reduction in export-oriented non-ferrous activity.

The Company funds its working capital through internal cash generation, sukuk placements, and short-term bank lines. As of end-Mar’25, short-term borrowings stood at PKR 25.31bln (FY24: PKR 24.99bln; FY23: PKR 20.62bln). The current ratio moderated to 6.8x in 3QFY25 (FY24: 8.3x; FY23: 10.2x).


Coverages

Free Cash Flows from operations (FCFO) were PKR 4.48bln in 3QFY25, down from PKR 5.92bln in FY24, PKR 8.25bln in FY23, and PKR 8.73bln in FY22, reflecting increased working capital absorption and higher borrowing costs. Finance costs remained elevated at PKR 4.67bln (3QFY24: PKR 4.69bln; FY24: PKR 6.36bln), leading to an interest coverage ratio of 1.2x in 3QFY25 (3QFY24: 1.3x; FY24: 1.2x; FY23: 2.3x).


Capitalization

As of end-Mar’25, the debt-to-equity ratio stood at 54.2% (end-Jun’24: 57.6%; end-Jun’23: 50.6%), reflecting improved leverage following fresh equity injection and reduced long-term repayment pressure. During FY25, the Company issued 9.85% right shares (30.06mn Class-C shares) at PKR 45 per share, resulting in an equity inflow of approximately PKR 1.48bln.

Long-term debt stood at PKR 2.95bln (end-Jun’24: PKR 2.40bln), while the current maturity of long-term obligations declined to PKR 1.2bln (3QFY24: PKR 4.1bln), indicating scheduled repayments. Short-term borrowings constituted around 77.5% of total borrowings, with ongoing efforts to renew and expand bank facilities alongside exploration of additional Sukuk-based funding avenues.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 20,101 19,653 19,761 16,533
2. Investments 50 50 50 0
3. Related Party Exposure 3,982 3,947 0 0
4. Current Assets 46,097 45,427 40,021 36,553
a. Inventories 17,396 23,418 20,219 21,043
b. Trade Receivables 14,591 10,806 9,283 5,574
5. Total Assets 70,230 69,077 59,832 53,085
6. Current Liabilities 6,944 5,500 3,905 3,314
a. Trade Payables 3,624 2,566 1,299 1,357
7. Borrowings 32,550 34,576 25,983 25,941
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 6 25
9. Non-Current Liabilities 3,284 2,865 4,565 2,959
10. Net Assets 27,453 26,135 25,372 20,847
11. Shareholders' Equity 27,453 26,135 25,372 20,847
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 66,168 92,383 67,390 66,153
a. Cost of Good Sold (60,300) (84,665) (57,719) (56,025)
2. Gross Profit 5,869 7,718 9,671 10,128
a. Operating Expenses (838) (1,065) (837) (951)
3. Operating Profit 5,031 6,652 8,834 9,177
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 177 331 (64) (353)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 5,208 6,983 8,770 8,824
a. Total Finance Cost (4,669) (6,364) (4,423) (2,622)
b. Taxation (86) 1,381 (866) (791)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 453 2,000 3,480 5,411
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 4,484 5,920 8,245 8,726
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (489) 82 4,385 6,233
c. Changes in Working Capital 2,839 (2,597) (5,024) (6,247)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,350 (2,515) (639) (15)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (789) (4,311) (1,666) (1,171)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (1,307) 7,339 27 4,126
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 255 512 (2,278) 2,941
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -4.5% 37.1% 1.9% 47.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 8.9% 8.4% 14.4% 15.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.7% 2.2% 5.2% 8.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 11.1% 3.6% 4.8% 3.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.3% 7.8% 15.1% 29.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 137 126 152 124
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 124 118 145 119
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 6.6 8.3 10.2 11.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.2 1.2 2.3 3.8
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 0.8 1.4 2.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -29.4 -38.5 1.3 0.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 54.2% 57.0% 50.6% 55.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 52.9 72.2 75.9 54.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 18.8% 21.3% 16.5% 10.1%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com