Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
10-Oct-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Irfan Noman Brothers (Private) Limited (‘the Company’), established in February 1998 as a Private Limited Company, is primarily involved in processing both semi-processed non-basmati and basmati rice. The Company exports its products to Malaysia and over 40 additional countries, with a robust processing capacity of 420,000 metric tons annually. The leadership is spearheaded by the sponsors, Mr. Irfan Ahmad Sheikh, Chairman of the Board, and Mr. Noman Ahmad Sheikh, the CEO, whose strategic oversight continues to guide the Company’s operations.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect Irfan Noman Brothers (Private) Limited’s established and prominent position within Pakistan’s rice export industry. The Company has consistently maintained its market share, supported by an effective customer retention strategy and a sustained international presence through marketing offices and warehouses in Dubai and Canada. The Company benefits from the strategic leadership of its sponsors, whose extensive international experience and successful business track record contribute to operational resilience and growth. A robust corporate governance framework, reinforced by stringent internal controls and a seasoned management team, underpins the Company’s operations. The sponsors’ strategic vision is evident in the development of a performance-driven corporate culture, enabling the Company to navigate the inherent challenges of the rice sector effectively. The rice sector, a significant contributor to Pakistan’s rice sector remains a key contributor to economic growth. While total rice production for CY25 was initially projected at approximately 10mln Mtons, but recent flooding in Punjab and Sindh affecting ~10–12% of the crop has disrupted supply chains, inundated agricultural land, and exerted upward pressure on domestic prices. These developments have posed significant challenges to both food security and the sector’s export competitiveness. In FY24, the Company recorded a notable 84% year-over-year increase in topline, primarily driven by record-high rice production. This growth was largely attributed to the favorable aftereffects of the floods experienced, which contributed to improved soil fertility and yields. However, this upward trajectory was not sustained in FY25. Adverse climatic conditions and reduced rainfall negatively impacted crop output, leading to a decline in the Company’s revenue by approximately 25.5%, primarily due to reduced sales volumes in both domestic and international markets. The decline in revenue was largely impacted by adverse pricing dynamics in the IRRI export market. Specifically, while IRRI export prices were stable in FY24 (ranging from $500 to $600 per metric ton), they fell sharply in FY25, settling between $400 and $450, due to India's surplus stocks. The sole exception was a specific Bulog tender priced at $555 per metric ton. The Company derives ~85% of its revenue from the export of basmati and Non basmati rice varieties, with major export destinations including Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and various African markets. In addition to its core rice export operations, the Company is engaged in the trading of solar panels, contributing to revenue diversification and enhancing overall financial resilience. Despite elevated input costs during FY25, the Company demonstrated improved profitability, reflecting effective cost management and operational efficiency. The net profit margin also saw a significant increase, due to substantial decline in finance costs. The Company’s capital structure is assessed as sound, underpinned by its reliance on short-term borrowing to manage working capital requirements. Furthermore, ratings take comfort from the sponsors’ depth of experience and unwavering commitment to accelerating the Company’s growth, this reinforces the ratings and strengthens the outlook for sustained operational success.

Key Rating Drivers

Prudent management and maintenance of a stable financial risk profile, especially in terms of the working capital, cash flows, and coverages is imperative for the ratings. Additionally, debt servicing, capitalizing international demands, and envisioned improvements in qualitative factors, going forward, remain crucial for the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Irfan Noman Brothers (Private) Limited (‘the Company’) was incorporated in Feb 1998 as a Private Limited Company under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017).


Background

Mr. Mukhtar Ahmad Sheikh, former Chairman of Rice Millers and Supplier Association, established a rice mill in 1960s and laid foundations of the Irfan Noman Group (‘the Group’). Over the years the Group managed to gain prominence in the rice sector and established another rice mill and also established rice farms.


Operations

The Company is primarily engaged in processing semi-processed non-basmati and basmati rice, which it exports to Malaysia and over 40 other countries. In recent years, the Company has experienced significant growth in its operations, underscored by the establishment of two processing units located in Port Qasim and S.I.T.E Karachi. The combined processing capacity of these units is 50 metric tons per hour, translating to an annual capacity of 420,000 metric tons. Additionally, the Company maintains a storage facility with a capacity of 55,000 metric tons per month. This expansion has resulted in a consistent upward trajectory in processing capacity, leading to a volumetric increase in the quantity of rice processed.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The company's major ownership is divided equally between two brothers and their respective sons. Mr. Noman Ahmad Sheikh holds the largest individual stake at 35%, and when combined with his son, Mr. Affan Bin Noman's 15% share, their family group controls exactly 50% of the company. The other brother, Mr. Irfan Ahmad Sheikh, owns 25%, while his two sons, Mr. Moaz Irfan and Mr. Sunaif Irfan, each hold an equal stake of 12.50%. This means the family group of Mr. Irfan Ahmad Sheikh also controls the remaining 50% of the company, resulting in a perfectly balanced ownership structure between the two branches of the family.


Stability

The Company is completely owned by the sponsoring family and the structure is seen as stable as the third generation has been successfully integrated in the family business. Formal succession planning would provide additional cushion to the stability.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family have been involved in the rice export business for over 6 decades and have witnessed multiple business cycles. The current sponsors have been associated with the Company for over 2 decades and have led to the prominence of the Company as one of the largest exporters of rice in the country.


Financial Strength

The sponsor’s substantial net worth, which provides the financial capacity to support the Company during periods of distress.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board is dominated by the sponsoring family and includes three Executive Directors, and two Non Executive Directors. 


Members’ Profile

The board and management team is led by Mr. Irfan Ahmad Sheikh, the Chairman, who has been with the company since 1998, bringing extensive experience in the rice sector, including involvement in research and seed development and representing the company at various conferences globally. The next generation of directors includes two individuals who joined in 2024 and share a family history in the FMCG business: Mr. Affan Bin Noman, who graduated from York University with a major in Business & Society, serves as a Director assisting with purchase and production matters and received the prestigious Rice Export Trophy on behalf of the company in 2024. Also joining in 2024 is Mr. Sunaif Irfan Sheikh, who holds a Commerce degree from York University and is responsible for the newly established Solar Business division. Finally, Mr. Moaz Irfan Sheikh, who holds a Bachelor's Degree in Finance from York University, serves as the Director of Sales & Marketing.


Board Effectiveness

The Board convened multiple times during FY25, with majority attendance to discuss pertinent matters. The minutes of these BOD meetings were well documented. To ensure effective governance, the Board has formed two committees, namely, (i) Audit Committee, and (ii) HR and Remuneration Committee.


Financial Transparency

The company's audit process for the financial statements ended June 2025 is nearing completion, with the report currently in the final review stage. The external auditors, Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq & Co, Chartered Accountants, are expected to issue an unqualified opinion, confirming that the financials are presented fairly in all material respects. This firm is highly reputed, as it holds a Quality Control Review (QCR) rating and is listed in Category 'A' of the State Bank of Pakistan's (SBP) approved panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has optimized its organizational structure as per the operational needs. The Company operates through functions of Finance, Procurement, Internal Audit, Production, Sales, HR & Admin. All functional heads report to the Company’s CEO except Internal Audit and HR & Admin.


Management Team

Mr. Noman Ahmad Sheikh, who has served as the CEO since 1998, possesses extensive and distinguished experience in the rice sector. His deep involvement includes pioneering rice research and seed development, actively participating in introducing new seed varieties from abroad, and representing Pakistan internationally. Notably, he has led delegations to China and participated in numerous rice conferences and seminars abroad. His expertise has been recognized nationally, as evidenced by his former role as Senior Vice Chairman of the Rice Exporters Association of Pakistan and his receipt of the Best Businessmen of the Year Gold Medal award from the Prime Minister of Pakistan.


Effectiveness

The Company benefits from streamlined operations, a direct result of the extensive experience of its sponsors combined with a professional management team. To further ensure management effectiveness and efficiency, the company utilizes a dedicated Management Committee. This committee is functionally diverse, comprising the Directors, the GM Plant, the CFO, the CAO, the CIA, and the Head of HR & Admin.


MIS

The Company has a customized ERP system in place installed by Sidat Hyder & Co. MIS reports are regularly generated and reviewed by the Management for operational efficiency and decision-making.


Control Environment

The Company has an internal audit function in place, which provides an effective mechanism for identification and reporting the risks arising out of the business operations.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s rice sector remains a critical growth driver, with 2024/25 production projected at nearly 10 million tonnes—among the highest on record—supported by favorable weather and strong farm-level profitability, while exports generated close to USD 3.9 billion in FY 2023-24, though earnings in FY 2024-25 have softened due to weaker non-basmati demand and declining global prices, offset by continued strength in basmati exports aided by India’s partial export restrictions. The recent floods in Punjab, which damaged an estimated 10–12% of the crop, have disrupted supply chains, submerged farmland, and elevated domestic prices, creating significant challenges for both food security and export competitiveness. Given that paddy procurement constitutes the single largest cost in the rice business, working capital availability is essential to secure timely procurement and maintain operational continuity; however, the flood-induced crop losses and logistical disruptions have tightened supply and increased financing pressures, complicating procurement management and liquidity planning. Despite these headwinds, major exporters such as Garibsons (Private) Limited, Meskey & Feemte, Asif Rice Mills, MATCO Foods, Irfan Noman, K.K. Rice Mills (Pvt.) Limited, Jhulay Laal Parboiled Rice Mill, and Jasons Commodities collectively recorded sales of approximately PKR 370 billion in FY24—accounting for about 40% of national rice exports—underscoring the sector’s resilience, while long-term growth will depend on productivity gains, sustainability measures, and enhanced market access.


Relative Position

The Company is a leading player in the country’s rice exporters market and holds approximately 2.5% market share in terms of sales.


Revenues

The Company's core business is the export of basmati and non-basmati rice, which drives the majority of its revenue, primarily through sales to key international markets including Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and Africa. International markets are strategically vital, accounting for approximately 85% of the company's total revenue, with the remaining 15% generated from local sales. Its rice export portfolio is heavily weighted toward non-basmati varieties, reflected in an export combination of about 90% IRRI (non-basmati) to 10% Basmati. To mitigate agricultural export risks, the Company has diversified its revenue streams through the trading of solar panels, corn, and polypropylene. Despite this diversification, the Company faced significant headwinds in FY25, leading to a 25.5% decline in revenue, dropping from approximately PKR 25.9 billion to PKR 19.29 billion. This contraction was attributed to weaker sales in both domestic and international markets. The decline in revenue was largely impacted by adverse pricing dynamics in the IRRI export market. Specifically, while IRRI export prices were stable in FY24 (ranging from $500 to $600 per metric ton), they fell sharply in FY25, settling between $400 and $450, due to India's surplus stocks. The sole exception was a specific Bulog tender priced at $555 per metric ton. It is also noted that the company executed most of its major exports in 2025 on a CNF (Cost and Freight) basis.


Margins

Despite facing a challenging revenue environment and rising input costs, the Company successfully improved its overall profitability during Fiscal Year 2025. The Gross Profit (GP) margin saw a healthy increase, rising to approximately 8.9% from 6.3% in FY24. This improvement was primarily achieved through effective operational efficiency and a successful reduction in raw material costs, which more than offset other rising expenses. However, this gain in GP margin did not fully translate to operating efficiency, as the Operating Profit margin actually declined to 0.9% in FY25, down from 2.6% in the prior year. Crucially, the Company's Net Profit margin showed a modest but significant increase, climbing to approximately 0.3% in FY25 compared to 0.1% in FY24. The main driver of this enhanced net profitability was a substantial improvement in financial health: finance costs plummeted by more than 50%, falling from PKR 647 million in FY24 to approximately PKR 210 million in FY25. Overall, the FY25 financial results demonstrate strong cost management and a dramatically improved capital structure, which successfully boosted net profitability despite operational pressures.


Sustainability

The sponsors are planning to add storage and processing facility at Faisalabad, Punjab to increase the Company’s footing in the basmati sector.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The company's working capital management saw a negative shift in FY25, with capital being tied up in operations for a longer period. The gross working capital cycle lengthened significantly to 51 days, up from 40 days in the previous year. This deterioration was almost entirely driven by a substantial increase in inventory days, which jumped from 19 days to 30 days, indicating a slower movement or higher holding of stock. While the elevated inventory negatively impacted the overall cycle, the company demonstrated improved efficiency in other areas. Trade receivable days remained stable at 21 days, showing consistent effectiveness in collecting payments from customers. Furthermore, payable days slightly improved, decreasing from 4 days to 3 days. However, these minor efficiencies in receivables and payables were not sufficient to counteract the increase in inventory. Consequently, the net cash cycle stretched to 48 days in FY25, compared to 36 days in FY24, suggesting that a larger amount of the company's capital is now committed to funding its day-to-day operations.


Coverages

The company's capacity to service its debt obligations significantly strengthened in FY25, primarily due to a substantial reduction in finance costs, which fell from PKR 647 million in FY24 to PKR 210 million in FY25. This improvement is clearly reflected in the interest coverage ratio, which nearly doubled from 1.8x to 3.5x, indicating a much greater cushion for meeting interest payments. However, this positive debt servicing trend happened despite a considerable weakening of the core operational cash generation, as Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) plummeted from PKR 673 million to PKR 173 million. Consequently, the ratio of FCFO over finance cost also slightly declined to 1.0x in FY25, down from 1.2x in FY24, suggesting that while the absolute cost of debt is lower, the cash flow derived from operations is only just sufficient to cover the reduced finance expenses.


Capitalization

The company maintained a highly leveraged capital structure in FY25, although its overall reliance on debt slightly decreased. The debt-to-equity ratio saw a modest improvement, falling from 58.8% to 56.7%. This minor change resulted from total debt slightly declining to PKR 3.52 billion (from PKR 3.57 billion) while equity increased to PKR 2,729 million (from PKR 2,679 million). A critical characteristic of the company's capital structure is its overwhelming reliance on short-term borrowings, which constitute a substantial 93.8% of total debt. This heavy concentration of short-term liabilities creates significant refinancing risk and leaves the company exposed to potential volatility in short-term credit markets. Thus, despite the marginal improvement in the overall leverage ratio, the capital structure remains vulnerable due to this high dependency on short-term financing, a dependency that is expected to continue going forward.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,392 3,435 3,316
2. Investments 79 0 100
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,066 3,611 3,885
a. Inventories 1,664 1,508 1,152
b. Trade Receivables 644 1,625 1,379
5. Total Assets 6,537 7,046 7,300
6. Current Liabilities 150 474 576
a. Trade Payables 92 245 302
7. Borrowings 3,514 3,567 3,898
8. Related Party Exposure 54 250 100
9. Non-Current Liabilities 91 77 61
10. Net Assets 2,729 2,679 2,665
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,729 2,679 2,665
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 19,291 25,908 14,090
a. Cost of Good Sold (17,567) (24,288) (12,956)
2. Gross Profit 1,725 1,620 1,134
a. Operating Expenses (1,543) (934) (718)
3. Operating Profit 182 686 416
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 288 216 331
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 469 902 746
a. Total Finance Cost (210) (647) (426)
b. Taxation (197) (241) (176)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 62 14 145
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 173 673 510
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (127) (73) 202
c. Changes in Working Capital 807 (621) 581
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 680 (694) 783
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (81) 16 (165)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (249) (173) (319)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 350 (851) 299
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -25.5% 83.9% -15.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 8.9% 6.3% 8.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.3% 0.1% 1.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 5.1% 0.2% 7.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.3% 0.5% 6.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 51 40 81
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 48 36 71
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 20.5 7.6 6.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.5 1.8 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.3 0.9 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 7.3 5.1 4.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 56.7% 58.8% 60.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 51.1 146.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 4.7% 12.6% 9.5%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com