Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Jun-25 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Hashwani Hotels Limited (HHL) was incorporated in Pakistan on 12 October 1972 as a private limited company under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017) and was converted into a public limited company on 11 November 1974. It owns and operates Marriott Hotels in Islamabad and Karachi, in addition to the Zaver Pearl Continental Hotel in Gwadar. The business is led by Hasan Ali Hashwani, who is carrying the legacy from Sadaruddin Hashwani, a prominent leading entrepreneur of Pakistan. Mr. Kamran Ahmed is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Rating Rationale

Hashwani Hotels Limited (HHL or the Company) holds a prominent position within Pakistan's hospitality sector. The Company owns and manages Marriott Hotels franchises in Islamabad and Karachi, alongside the Zaver Pearl Continental Hotel in Gwadar. Assigned ratings take benefits of two key factors. First, it's an exclusive franchise agreement with Marriott International, which stands as a globally leading hotel chain, boasting a vast portfolio of nearly 9,500 properties across more than 30 brands in 144 countries, encompassing ~1.7 million rooms worldwide. Secondly, the Company benefits from the sponsor's extensive experience, cultivated over four decades, in the ownership, operation, and management of five-star hotel chains across metropolitan cities. During 2024, Pakistan’s tourism sector exhibited notable growth, both in revenue and international standing. The country’s ranking in the World Economic Forum’s Travel & Tourism Development Index (TTDI) improved significantly, moving up 20 places to the 101st position. The growing potential of Pakistan’s hospitality sector has attracted both domestic and international hotel chains, which are actively expanding their portfolios to meet the increasing demand for quality accommodations across luxury, business, and budget segments. This expansion reflects growing confidence in the market’s long-term viability and its capacity to absorb diverse offerings. Aligned with prevailing trends in the hospitality industry, the Company’s key performance indicators (KPIs), including occupancy levels and average daily room rates, demonstrated improvements. During 9MFY25, the Company’s topline improved to ~PKR 7.5bln (FY24: ~PKR 8.3bln), marking a ~20.2% YoY increase. Concurrently, the Company’s margins improved across all levels. Going forward, the Company's upcoming Zaver Pearl Continental Hotel project in Peshawar is expected to further strengthen revenue streams and margins. The Company benefits from highly skilled and professional management, providing robust operational support. However, independent oversight on the board for transparent decision-making would be viewed positively. The financial risk profile of the Company is considered strong, characterized by adequate coverage metrics, healthy cash flows, and an efficient working capital cycle. The Company’s capital structure is moderately leveraged, with borrowings exclusively comprising long-term facilities primarily utilized for CAPEX requirements.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the sustained operational performance amidst an evolving business environment, and a consistent improvement in profitability metrics. Looking ahead, the growth contributions from the Company’s non-operational projects to enhance the topline will remain critical. Furthermore, the consistency in the performance indicators, as illustrated in the shared financial projections, will continue to be paramount for the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Hashwani Hotels Limited (hereafter referred to as ‘HHL’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in Pakistan on 12 October 1972 as a private limited company under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017) and was converted into a public limited company on 11 November 1974. The registered office of the Company is situated at Karachi Marriott Hotel - 9-Abdullah Haroon Road, Civil lines, Karachi.


Background

The Company commenced its commercial operations in 1978, with the launch of Holiday Inn Islamabad under the franchise agreement with Bass Europeans, Netherlands. In an effort to expand its operations, HHL launched Holiday Inn Karachi in 1981.  After more than a decade of successful operations, HHL approached the Marriott Worldwide Corporation USA in order to negotiate the franchise to own and operate the Marriott chain of hotels in Pakistan. Based upon their successful experience of managing foreign hotel franchises, HHL was awarded the franchise to own and operate the Marriott chain of hotels in Pakistan in 1992, under a franchise agreement. As a part of the Marriott Hotel Network, HHL has access to the Marriott International Reservation System (MARSHA) for easy access to any Marriott Worldwide Hotel and travel agents worldwide. Both hotels are renowned for their ideal locations, décor, and friendly atmosphere. The hotels have a tradition of continuous product development, service improvement, and upgrading of operating standards, exceeding the expectations of their guests.


Operations

The Company is a prominent player in Pakistan’s hospitality sector, holding the franchise for the international Marriott hotel chain. It currently owns and operates Marriott Hotels in Islamabad and Karachi, in addition to the Zaver Pearl Continental Hotel in Gwadar. The Company employs over 1,000 individuals across its various locations. Furthermore, it has an upcoming project, the Zaver Pearl Continental Hotel Hayatabad Peshawar, indicating continued expansion.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company operates as a subsidiary of M/s Verintex General Establishment, a foreign entity incorporated in Vaduz, Liechtenstein, holding a controlling interest of ~81.39% of its shares. The remaining ownership is distributed, with Mr. Sadruddin Hashwani holding ~18.42% of the shares, and the rest being held by the Company’s senior management.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company is deemed stable, as it has remained under the control of the current sponsors for several decades, with no changes expected in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

Mr. Sadruddin Hashwani-well known entrepreneur of Pakistan established his business from 1960. First hotel was set up in 1978 and second in 1981 under the brand ‘Holiday Inn’ by HHL. In the following years, Company gained franchise rights for Marriott Hotels by Marriott International. The sponsors have considerable expertise in hospitality sector. 


Financial Strength

The Sponsor’s decades-long active involvement in both the oil & gas and hospitality sectors clearly demonstrates its strong business acumen. Their sustained success is deeply rooted in two core strengths: proven local business accomplishments and a strategic ability to forge alliances with leading global hotel chain. This potent combination enables them to effectively navigate market complexities while simultaneously leveraging international best practices and global brand recognition. 


Governance
Board Structure

The board comprises five members: four non-executive directors (including the chairman) and one executive director who also serves as the CFO.


Members’ Profile

All members of the Board of Directors (BoD) are seasoned professionals with extensive industry experience and long-standing affiliations with the Company. The Chairman, Mr. Hasan Ali Hashwani, has been an integral part of the Board since 2022 and completed his master’s degree in Switzerland. Since then, he has played a pivotal role in the Company’s continued success. Among the non-executive directors are Mr. Babar Hussain and Mr. Syed Maqsood Sher who further strengthen the Board with their diverse professional backgrounds and extensive expertise.


Board Effectiveness

The board of Hashwani Hotels Limited has established an HR & Remuneration Committee to enhance its effectiveness. The committee is chaired by the CEO and includes members from the board. The meetings are held on an as-needed basis. This structure raises concerns over the consistent independent oversight and robust governance.


Financial Transparency

Hashwani Hotels Limited demonstrates a strong commitment to financial transparency. The Company’s external auditors are Grant Thornton Anjum Rahman Chartered Accountants, a firm with a satisfactory QCR rating and classified in category ‘A’ by the SBP. For the financial year ended June 2024, the firm expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company maintains a well-defined organizational structure with eight functional and administrative departments, each operating under a multi-layered hierarchy. These departments are led by qualified heads who report directly to the CEO and COO, ensuring streamlined communication and effective management. Notably, the organizational oversight is further bolstered by structured delegation of authority and an internal audit department, led by a board director, enhancing governance and control. Currently, all key positions are fully staffed, which is a positive indicator of the Company’s commitment to operational efficiency and a robust workforce.


Management Team

The management team at Hashwani Hotels Limited is composed of qualified professionals with extensive skills. The CEO, Mr. Kamran Ahmed, has over 30 years of experience in investment banking and the oil & gas industry, including working with Shell Pakistan, Dar Al Maal Islami S.A., Merrill Lynch, Bankers Equity, and IIBL. He has been with Orient Petroleum Inc. for 20 years and has spearheaded the growth of Orient Petroleum Inc. (OPI). Mr. Alex Bloch Jorgensen, the COO, is an experienced Australian project manager with over 20 years in international construction and development. He specializes in client-side management of large-scale projects across multiple countries. This leadership is assisted by a team of seasoned professionals, including the CFO, Mr. Shah Faisal, who is a qualified chartered accountant with almost two decades of professional experience, especially in the hotel industry. He has also served in various positions at the Ramada Continental Hotel Dubai and Shell UK.


Effectiveness

HHL’s senior management receives daily performance reports of the operations which results in optimal monitoring. While there are no formal management committees, key management personnel meet on daily and weekly basis to discuss key issues. Furthermore, there are regular need-based meetings for discussion of issues.


MIS

The Company’s adoption of Oracle’s ‘Opera’, an integrated, cloud-based management system tailored for the hospitality industry, demonstrates a commitment to robust operational efficiency and data management. This system is crucial for streamlining hotel operations, from reservations and guest services to financial reporting. Additionally, the Company leverages Tejari Pakistan for procurement facilitation, indicating a strategic approach to optimizing its supply chain and enhancing cost efficiencies. This combination of specialized software and strategic procurement partnership suggests a well-considered MIS framework that supports both core hospitality functions and broader operational needs.


Control Environment

Hashwani Hotels Limited maintains a robust control environment through a detailed and updated Management Information System (MIS). This system, which features key performance indicators, is submitted to the Chairman/CEO/CFO on a regular basis. Crucially, the integration of the Company’s MIS with global Marriott standards significantly elevates its internal control framework. This alignment implies adherence to internationally recognized best practices, standardized operational protocols, and enhanced data integrity across its properties.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s robust services sector remains the largest contributor to the national GDP. As of the third quarter of FY25, it demonstrated a positive growth of 3.99% and accounts for an estimated 57.7% of the GDP for FY24, significantly surpassing the combined size of agriculture and industry. The hotel and restaurant industry, an integral component of this sector, directly contributes to the GDP and is intricately linked to tourism performance. The tourism sector in Pakistan is witnessing a notable resurgence. The sector’s growth is driven by both domestic and international travelers, improved infrastructure, government initiatives (including eased visa policies for 126 countries), and increased global recognition. The World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) projected the Pakistan T&T sector’s contribution to GDP to grow to 6.1% (~PKR 5.91 trillion) in 2024, up from 5.8% in 2023. This positive trend, however, is leading to an increasingly competitive landscape within the hotel industry. Established luxury chains like Pearl Continental (PC), Serena, Nishat, and Avari are strategically expanding into the budget and mid-scale segments through brands such as Hotel One (PC’s brand), AvariXpress, etc. This diversification, alongside the entry of new local and international hotel brands, signifies a transformative period for the industry, characterized by greater choice and intensifying competition across various market segments. The market is projected to register a CAGR of over 6.56% during the forecast period (2025-2030), reflecting sustained growth momentum.


Relative Position

Hashwani Hotels Limited, with its prominent premium brand portfolio, including global hotel franchises, is well-positioned to consistently attract a high-end clientele, ranging from discerning local patrons to international travelers and state guests. The Company effectively leverages its established group expertise and strong global brand image, particularly by operating in key metropolitan centers of Pakistan. While Pakistan’s hospitality market is anticipating increased competition with the entry of new local and international hotel chains, this dynamic simultaneously presents strategic opportunities for HHL. By leveraging its premium offerings and strategic expansions, HHL is well-equipped to further penetrate the market and solidify its leadership in the luxury segment. Currently, based on the number of rooms, Pearl Continental (PC) leads with ~1,701 rooms, followed by Serena Hotels with ~961 rooms, Hashwani Hotels with ~619 rooms, Avari hotel with ~600 rooms, and Nishat Hotel with ~200 rooms.


Revenues

The Company derives its revenue from three primary segments: rooms (the largest contributor), food & beverage, and other ancillary services. As of 9MFY25, the ADR for Marriott properties in Islamabad and Karachi stood at ~PKR 42,228, with an occupancy rate of ~77.12%. In contrast, the ADR and occupancy rate for the Gwadar hotel stood at ~PKR 16,391 and 2.72%, respectively. Total revenue of the Company reached ~PKR 7.5bln (FY24: ~PKR8.3bln, FY23: ~PKR 6.2bln) in 9MFY25, representing a robust ~20.2% YoY growth.


Margins

The Company’s profitability metrics show improvement at all levels. The gross margin increased to ~48.9% in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~35.7%, FY23: ~40.1%, FY22: ~40.7%), while the operating margin rose to ~31.7% in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~17%, FY23: ~18.4%, FY22: ~18.3%). This upward trend indicates enhanced operational efficiency. Concurrently, the profit margin for 9MFY25 reached ~26.4%, a notable increase from ~14.1% in FY24.


Sustainability

The Company fundamentally rely on brand strength to attract and retain customers. In this regard, the HHL possesses a significant competitive advantage. Its decades-long involvement in the hospitality sector has cemented its position as a well-known and trusted brand, synonymous with top-tier facilities and services. This established reputation is crucial for long-term sustainability. Furthermore, the strategic affiliation with a global brand like Marriott amplifies this strength considerably. This partnership provides the Company direct access to a vast network of high-profile national and international clientele who often prioritize globally recognized brands for their first choice in accommodations. This dual brand power—the established local credibility of HHL’s own four decades experience combined with Marriott's international reach—positions the Company robustly against competitors and underpins its ability to drive consistent customer traffic.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s gross working capital days slightly increased to ~33 days in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~27 days, FY23: ~25 days, FY22: ~19 days), driven by an increase in trade receivable days. Despite this, the net working capital cycle has remained negative over the years, standing at ~6 days in 9MFY25 (FY24: ~27 days, FY23: ~37 days, FY22: ~34 days), indicating strong operational liquidity management.


Coverages

The Company demonstrated strong coverage ratios during 9MFY25. The EBITDA to Finance Cost ratio significantly improved to 6.5x (3.6x in FY24, 1.9x in FY23, 2.6x in FY22), while the interest coverage ratio stood at 6.1x (FY24: 3.3x, FY23: 1.7x, FY22: 2.4x). The core coverage ratio also strengthened to 2.2x (FY24: 1.2x, FY23: 0.6x, FY22: 0.7x) and a debt payback ratio was 2.2x as of Jun-24. It is noted that coverage ratios had weakened in FY24 and FY23 primarily due to an increase in finance costs.


Capitalization

Hashwani Hotels Limited maintained a moderately leveraged capital structure, with its leverage ratio improving to ~36.3% in 9MFY25, compared to ~39.9% in FY24 and ~49.1% in FY23. The Company's borrowings exclusively comprise long-term facilities, primarily utilized for CAPEX requirements.


 
 

Jun-25

www.pacra.com


Mar-25
9M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 7,330 5,498 5,528 5,213
2. Investments 1,925 1,927 1,711 1,909
3. Related Party Exposure 131 131 126 211
4. Current Assets 2,874 1,974 1,331 1,497
a. Inventories 86 81 73 55
b. Trade Receivables 1,004 621 450 269
5. Total Assets 12,260 9,529 8,695 8,830
6. Current Liabilities 2,245 2,257 1,919 1,418
a. Trade Payables 973 1,165 1,280 846
7. Borrowings 3,494 2,756 2,884 4,616
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 382 364 908 174
10. Net Assets 6,139 4,153 2,984 2,621
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,139 4,153 2,984 2,621
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,514 8,336 6,285 4,940
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,837) (5,359) (3,765) (2,928)
2. Gross Profit 3,677 2,978 2,520 2,012
a. Operating Expenses (1,293) (1,560) (1,363) (1,108)
3. Operating Profit 2,384 1,418 1,157 904
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 105 616 487 57
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,488 2,034 1,644 961
a. Total Finance Cost (502) (638) (818) (582)
b. Taxation 0 (225) (465) (196)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,986 1,171 362 183
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 2,578 1,829 1,303 1,248
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,063 1,205 648 512
c. Changes in Working Capital (888) (170) 771 39
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,175 1,035 1,419 551
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (2,043) (68) (437) 45
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 732 (521) (1,501) (515)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (136) 446 (519) 81
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 20.2% 32.6% 27.2% 99.3%
b. Gross Profit Margin 48.9% 35.7% 40.1% 40.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 26.4% 14.1% 5.8% 3.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 22.5% 19.9% 33.0% 26.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 51.5% 32.8% 12.9% 7.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 33 27 25 19
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -6 -27 -37 -34
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.3 0.9 0.7 1.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 6.5 3.6 1.9 2.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.2 1.2 0.6 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.2 2.2 5.8 5.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 36.3% 39.9% 49.1% 63.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 32.7 47.8 45.7 86.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 18.0% 19.6% 20.2% 10.6%

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

Jun-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-25

www.pacra.com