Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
23-Jan-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jan-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jan-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jan-23 BBB A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Ali Embroidery Mills (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in Pakistan in 1972 as a private limited Company. The Company is associated with the Sefam Group of Industries, and EastGate Industries (Pvt.) Ltd headquartered in Lahore. The Company has a three-member sponsoring family board. The board is chaired by Mr. Hamid Zaman, while the CEO, Mr. Tariq Zaman oversees the Company’s affairs.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Ali Embroidery Mills (Private) Limited (“AEML” or “the Company”) reflect its established position within Pakistan’s value-added textile segment, operating in industrial embroidery that supports downstream garment manufacturing. The Company’s business model is characterized by specialized capacity, recurring demand, and close integration with garment manufacturers, despite operating in a fragmented segment. As per the management, AEML operates 142 multi-head embroidery machines and 33 Schiffli machines at high utilization levels, indicating sustained operating traction. During FY25, revenue clocked in at PKR 2.7bln (FY24: PKR 2.2bln), supported by favorable pricing amidst stable volumes.

Profitability outcomes provide a lens into the Company’s operating quality amid a challenging cost environment. The gross profits witnessed an augmentation to PKR 409.2mln (FY24: PKR 342.3mln) and net profit to PKR 100.5mln (FY24: PKR 60.9mln). However, margin performance remained broadly stable during the year, with the gross profit margin marginally easing to 15.3% (FY24: 15.8%), while the net profit margin improved to 3.8% (FY24: 2.8%). Energy optimization initiatives, including the installation of 1.3MW of solar capacity against total requirements of ~1.4MW, have partially shielded the Company from grid-related cost volatility. Revenue remains concentrated, with FY25 sales primarily from related-party manufacturers. While this integration supports order continuity and capacity utilization, the lack of customer diversification highlights a reliance on a limited number of counterparties. This reliance ties growth sustainability to the performance and expansion plans of its associated companies, though pricing is market-competitive and transactions are conducted on an arm’s-length basis.

AEML’s FY25 performance is notable in the broader sector context. Pakistan’s textile sector faces moderated external demand and structurally high costs, yet value-added segments have exhibited relative stability. An easing monetary environment provided incremental relief on financing costs, supporting sector-wide cash flows. From a financial risk perspective, improved internal cash generation reflects a favorable interplay between scale and working capital management. Free Cash Flow from Operations rose to PKR 279mln (FY24: PKR 237mln), supporting liquidity and financial flexibility. While the capital structure remains leveraged, strengthened cash flows and retained profits demonstrate the Company’s capacity to internally support operations. Liquidity remains adequate, supported by established banking lines and working capital facilities. For the current year, operating continuity and liquidity indicators remain broadly in line with FY25.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings depend on the Company’s ability to sustain disciplined operations and stable cash flows, underpinned by full utilization of existing embroidery capacity. Margin resilience will hinge on ongoing cost and energy optimization, along with prudent working capital management.

Profile
Legal Structure

Ali Embroidery Mills (Private) Limited (“AEML” or “the Company”) was incorporated in Pakistan in 1972 as a private limited company under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984.


Background

The Company is associated with the Sefam Group of Industries and East Gate Industries (Pvt.) Limited, headquartered in Lahore, Pakistan. AEML was originally founded by the late Mr. J.A. Zaman and represents one of the earliest organized ventures of the group, preceding the establishment of Sefam (Pvt.) Limited and Sarena Textile Industries (Pvt.) Limited. Over the years, the Company has developed into an established participant within Pakistan’s value-added textile segment, operating in the dedicated embroidery space that supports downstream garment manufacturing. With an operating history spanning more than five decades, AEML specializes in Schiffli and multi-head embroidery, supplying value-added fabric inputs to garment manufacturers.


Operations

The Company operates two production units located on Sheikhupura Road, Lahore, while its head office is situated on Waris Road, Lahore. As per management, AEML operates approximately 142 multi-head embroidery machines and 33 Schiffli embroidery machines, which have been running at high utilization levels, reflecting sustained order inflows. The Company is principally engaged in the manufacturing and sale of embroidered cloth, with sales primarily routed to related-party garment manufacturers. The Company’s total energy requirement is approximately 1.4MW. During the review period, AEML had installed solar capacity of around 1.3MW, with the remaining requirement sourced from LESCO. The investment in renewable energy has contributed to partial mitigation of grid-related energy cost volatility.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company is owned by the descendants of the late Mr. J.A. Zaman. Shareholding is primarily divided among family members, with Mr. Tariq Zaman, Mr. Hamid Zaman, Ms. Seema Aziz, and Ms. Ambreen Zaman each holding approximately 24.5% stake, while Mr. Ali Zaman holds a minority share of approximately 2%.


Stability

Ownership of the Company remains stable and concentrated within the founding family. The business continues to be managed by the second generation of the Zaman family, and no changes in the ownership structure were observed during the review period. The continuity of shareholding and long-standing family involvement provide stability to the Company’s strategic direction.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family possesses extensive experience in Pakistan’s textile and apparel sector. Mr. Hamid Zaman has been associated with Ali Embroidery Mills since its early years, working alongside the late Mr. J.A. Zaman, and played a key role in the establishment of Sefam and Sarena group companies. Mr. Tariq Zaman, the Chief Executive Officer, oversees the strategic and operational direction of the Company and brings considerable industry experience. The depth of sponsor involvement across group entities supports informed decision-making and operational continuity.


Financial Strength

The sponsoring group has developed a diversified presence across Pakistan’s textile and apparel value chain, encompassing value-added manufacturing and fashion retail. AEML has remained a core operating entity within the group, contributing through its specialized embroidery operations. Over the years, the Company’s equity base has expanded through retention of profits. During FY25, improved operating scale and internal cash generation further supported the Company’s financial profile.


Governance
Board Structure

AEML operates under a three-member, sponsor-dominated Board of Directors, chaired by Mr. Hamid Zaman. The Board includes one executive director, Mr. Tariq Zaman, who also serves as the Chief Executive Officer. Governance oversight remains centralized with the sponsoring family, which is reflective of the Company’s closely held ownership structure. While the Board benefits from active sponsor involvement and sector expertise, the absence of independent representation limits formal external oversight.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Hamid Zaman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Sefam (Pvt.) Limited, brings over four decades of experience in Pakistan’s textile sector and holds a degree from Utah State University, USA. Ms. Seema Aziz, Chief Executive Officer of East Gate Industries (Pvt.) Limited, also possesses more than 40 years of industry experience and is a graduate of Harvard Business School. The Board’s composition reflects deep sector knowledge and long-standing involvement across the group’s operating entities.


Board Effectiveness

The Board does not convene formal meetings on a scheduled basis. Instead, strategic and operational matters are discussed on an informal and need-based basis, consistent with the Company’s sponsor-led governance style. No Board-level sub-committees have been constituted, indicating a relatively centralized decision-making framework.


Financial Transparency

M/s Arshad Raheem & Co., Chartered Accountants, serve as the Company’s external auditors. The firm holds a satisfactory Quality Control Review (QCR) rating from ICAP, though it is not rated by the State Bank of Pakistan. The auditors have expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s organizational structure is functionally aligned and comprises key departments, including Production, Marketing, Finance, Procurement, Administration, Inventory Management, Mechanical, Electrical, Human Resources, and Quality Assurance. This structure supports operational coordination across manufacturing, sales, and support functions.


Management Team

Mr. Tariq Zaman, Chief Executive Officer, holds an MBA degree from LUMS and possesses extensive experience in Pakistan’s textile sector. Mr. Hafiz Umair Nadeem serves as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Design and sales functions are overseen by the General Manager Marketing, Mr. Shafqat Khan, while production and administrative operations are managed by the General Manager Factories, Mr. Mubashir Abdali. The management team comprises individuals with relevant sector experience, supporting continuity in day-to-day operations.


Effectiveness

Management effectiveness is supported through periodic review of MIS reports at varying frequencies. Financial position and sales performance are monitored regularly by senior management, while production efficiency for multi-head embroidery machines is tracked on a real-time basis. Enhancement of monitoring systems for Schiffli machines through the FPS platform is expected to further strengthen operational oversight.


MIS

The Company utilizes Sidat Hyder (GL Module) as its core financial accounting system, implemented in December 2017 through D-Biz Solutions (Pvt.) Limited. In addition, AEML has developed and deployed in-house systems, including the Factory Production System (FPS), which supports billing management and monitoring of fabric flow for multi-head embroidery machines.


Control Environment

The control environment is primarily operational in nature, with quality assurance embedded within production processes. Primary customers conduct independent quality assessments of supplied products, which provides an external check on output standards. Internal controls remain management-driven, with scope for further formalization over time.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports improved during FY25, supported by gradual normalization in global demand and easing domestic financial conditions. Sector exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, including garments and home textiles. The operating environment remained constrained by elevated energy tariffs and the full-year impact of the Normal Tax Regime, which has structurally altered post-tax profitability for export-oriented units. However, the progressive decline in policy rates during FY25 provided partial relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics across the sector. Overall, industry conditions during FY25 reflected a shift towards stabilization, with performance increasingly dependent on product mix, export orientation, and energy efficiency.


Relative Position

AEML operates in the industrial embroidery segment, a fragmented yet specialized niche within Pakistan’s value-added textile value chain. While modest in scale relative to large composite exporters, the Company is an established participant in the domestic embroidery space, supplying embroidered fabric to downstream garment manufacturers. Its operating relevance is underpinned by specialized capacity, long-standing relationships within the group’s apparel ecosystem, and sustained utilization of its embroidery assets.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company reported revenue of PKR 2.67bln (FY24: PKR 2.16bln), reflecting continued scale-up supported by favorable pricing amid stable production volumes. The revenue profile remains concentrated, with sales primarily routed to related-party garment manufacturers. No meaningful client diversification was observed during the review period, and revenue growth largely mirrored the expansion and operating performance of associated entities. While this integrated structure supports order visibility and capacity utilization, it links AEML’s growth trajectory to the performance and expansion plans of its related counterparties.


Margins

Profitability improved in absolute terms during FY25, with gross profit increasing to PKR 409.2 million (FY24: PKR 342.3 million) and net profit rising to PKR 100.5 million (FY24: PKR 60.9 million). Margin performance remained broadly stable during the year, as the gross margin edged down marginally to approximately 15.3% (FY24: 15.8%), while the net margin improved to around 3.8% (FY24: 2.8%). The marginal movement in gross margins primarily reflected elevated raw material and energy costs, which were partially mitigated through operating efficiencies and selective cost pass-through.


Sustainability

The Company’s investment in energy optimization remains a key structural mitigant. During FY25, AEML operated with installed solar capacity of approximately 1.3MW against total requirements of around 1.4MW, reducing exposure to grid-related cost volatility. While this has supported margin defense, profitability remains sensitive to broader input cost movements and pricing discipline within the value chain.


Financial Risk
Working capital

AEML’s working capital profile remains stretched, reflective of the nature of the embroidery business and its role within the group’s integrated supply chain. During FY25, internal cash generation improved, supported by scale-up in operations and disciplined working capital management. Inventory and receivable levels remained aligned with production requirements and billing cycles of related counterparties, while payable days remained limited, consistent with the Company’s procurement structure. Overall, the net working capital cycle continues to exert pressure on liquidity, albeit partially mitigated by predictable order flows.


Coverages

The Company’s cash flow profile strengthened during FY25, with Free Cash Flow from Operations increasing to PKR 279mln (FY24: PKR 237mln), supported by improved operating scale and cash conversion. Improved internal cash generation translated into better debt servicing capacity. Interest coverage ratios improved during the year, reflecting both higher operating cash flows and easing financing costs. Debt coverage indicators also strengthened, supporting the Company’s financial flexibility.


Capitalization

The Company’s equity base strengthened further, increasing to PKR 690.5 million as of FY25 (FY24: PKR 590.0 million), driven by retained earnings during the year. The expanded equity cushion provides additional balance sheet support and enhances the Company’s capacity to absorb potential shocks.


 
 

Jan-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,257 910 860
2. Investments 24 20 18
3. Related Party Exposure 1 1 0
4. Current Assets 786 998 1,050
a. Inventories 117 529 673
b. Trade Receivables 439 244 214
5. Total Assets 2,068 1,929 1,928
6. Current Liabilities 435 389 271
a. Trade Payables 195 77 36
7. Borrowings 288 143 199
8. Related Party Exposure 644 801 921
9. Non-Current Liabilities 10 6 7
10. Net Assets 690 590 529
11. Shareholders' Equity 690 590 529
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,670 2,161 1,580
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,261) (1,819) (1,286)
2. Gross Profit 409 342 294
a. Operating Expenses (200) (169) (169)
3. Operating Profit 209 173 125
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 16 26 38
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 225 199 163
a. Total Finance Cost (86) (106) (96)
b. Taxation (39) (32) (20)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 100 61 47
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 279 237 192
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 199 210 164
c. Changes in Working Capital 299 166 (106)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 498 376 57
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (206) (82) (58)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (249) (220) 2
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 44 75 1
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 23.6% 36.7% 27.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 15.3% 15.8% 18.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.8% 2.8% 3.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 21.6% 18.7% 5.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 15.7% 10.9% 9.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 97 140 195
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 79 131 180
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.8 2.6 3.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.9 2.6 2.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.3 1.4 0.9
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 4.8 6.8 11.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 57.4% 61.5% 67.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 1033.6 811.1 597.1
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.4% 10.5% 8.7%

Jan-26

www.pacra.com

Jan-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jan-26

www.pacra.com