Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
11-Mar-26 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
04-Apr-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
05-Apr-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
06-Apr-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
08-Apr-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

SGM Sugar Mills Limited, a public unlisted company incorporated in September 2007, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of crystalline sugar and by-products. The Company operates a 14,000 TCD production facility at Wallo Mahar, Ghotki, Sindh. The Essarani family holds a 77% controlling stake, acquired in May 2018 from the Dhabi and Etihad Groups, while the Mehar family retains 23%. Governance is led by Mr. Deo Mal Essarani as Chairman and Mr. Asha Ram Essarani as CEO, with strategic and executive management primarily overseen by Dr. Tara Chand Essarani.

Rating Rationale

The rating upgrade of SGM Sugar Mills Limited (“SGM” or “the Company”) is primarily underpinned by a significant strengthening of the Company’s profitability profile and enhanced earnings stability during MY25. The upgrade reflects the company’s strengthened margins, enhanced profitability, and a robust improvement in key debt coverage indicators. The assigned ratings continue to factor in SGM’s established position within the domestic sugar industry and its strong strategic linkage with the Deoomal (DM) United Group. The Group's diversified presence across the sugar value chain—including Sindh Abadgars Sugar Mills, United Ethanol Industries, Ranipur Sugar Mills, and Agro Trade—provides SGM with significant operational synergies and financial flexibility. Since its incorporation in 2007, SGM has evolved into a resilient entity under the stewardship of the Essarani family (holding ~77% stake). The Company operates a crushing plant in Ghotki, Sindh, with a capacity of 14,000 TCD. During the MY25 season, the Company produced 93,745 tons of sugar with a recovery rate of 9.22%. Operational efficiency has been further bolstered by the effective monetization of by-products (molasses and bagasse), which provide a critical cushion against the inherent cyclicality of the sugar sector.
On the financial side, SGM has undergone a positive transformation in MY25, characterized by a robust increase in earnings and a notable strengthening of its risk profile. The Company recorded a substantial surge in net profit to PKR 552 million (MY24: PKR 145 million), driving a significant expansion in net margins to ~4.4% from a thin ~1.0% in the preceding year. This recovery was bolstered by disciplined working capital management and a more favorable interest rate environment, which contributed to a reduction in finance costs. Liquidity remains a key strength, with Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) reaching ~PKR 1,756 million, providing ample headroom to meet short-term obligations and sustain operational flexibility. Furthermore, the capital structure improved as leverage declined to ~30.1% (MY24: ~36.7%), supported by a growing equity base of ~PKR 5.61 billion. This deleveraging, coupled with a strengthened debt-servicing capacity, underscores the Company’s heightened ability to withstand industry cyclicality and potential liquidity pressures.

Key Rating Drivers

The Company’s credit standings are contingent upon its ability to maintain profit margins, sustain strong cash flows, and uphold financial safeguards through consistent financial discipline. Continued emphasis on the prudent management of working capital remains critical to sustaining liquidity and operational flexibility. Any significant deterioration in profitability, cash flow generation, or financial safeguards will be translated into the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

SGM Sugar Mills Limited (“SGM” or “the Company”) is a public unlisted company incorporated in Pakistan in September 2007. The Company’s principal business activity is the manufacture and sale of crystalline sugar.


Background

The Company was incorporated in September 2007 and was formerly owned jointly by Dhabi Group (44%), Etihad Group (22%) and Mehar Family (34%). During May 2018, DM United Group, represented by the Essarani Family, acquired majority shareholding of the Company.


Operations

The Company primarily engages in the manufacturing and sale of crystalline sugar, along with related by-products such as molasses and bagasse. Its mill, located in Ghotki, Sindh, has a crushing capacity of 14,000 TCD, while the head office operates from Karachi. During MY25, the Company processed 1,016,236 tons of sugarcane, producing 93,745 tons of sugar and achieving a recovery rate of 9.22%.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s majority shareholding of 77% is held by the Essarani family through Deoo Mal Essarani (16%) and his three sons, Asha Ram Essarani (29%), Mahesh Kumar Essarani (13%) and Tara Chand Essarani (20%), while the remaining 23% is held by the Mehar family through Sardar Muhammad Baksh Khan Mehar (10%) and Sardar Ali Gohar Khan Mehar (13%).


Stability

Ownership stability is considered strong, as the Company’s controlling interest is consolidated within a single family. Shareholdings are clearly defined and distributed among individual family members, ensuring continuity in decision-making and alignment of long-term strategic interests.


Business Acumen

The Essarani family has a longstanding presence in the agriculture sector and collectively operates under the banner of “DM United Group.” The Group’s portfolio includes Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills Limited, United Ethanol Industries Limited, Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals, and Ranipur Sugar Mills Private Limited, reflecting its diversified footprint across sugar, ethanol, trading, and agrochemicals segments.


Financial Strength

The Company derives adequate financial strength from the support of its Group and sponsors. As of MY25, the Company reported total assets of ~PKR 12.75 billion, supported by a solid equity base of ~PKR 5.61 billion, reflecting a sound capitalization profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors consists of four members, including the Chief Executive Officer, all of whom serve as Executive Directors. All four members are from the Essarani family, with no representation from the Mehar family.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Deo Mal Essarani serves as the Chairman of the Board and brings over 46 years of diversified experience; he also chairs Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills Limited and United Ethanol Industries Limited. Mr. Tara Chand Essarani serves as a Director and has more than 20 years of experience in the sugar industry.


Board Effectiveness

The Board’s effectiveness shows room for improvement, as evidenced by the low frequency of meetings and the absence of dedicated Board committees to oversee key functions and governance areas.


Financial Transparency

The Company’s external auditors, M/s Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq Chartered Accountants, classified as Category ‘A’ by the SBP and holding a satisfactory QCR rating from ICAP, have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended September 2024.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company maintains a well-defined organizational structure to ensure efficient management and operational oversight. The highest level of authority rests with the Chief Executive, who is supported by the Resident Director – Mills and the Chief Financial Officer. Functional departments at the mill, including cane procurement, production, and mechanical operations, report directly to the Resident Director, providing clear reporting lines and effective operational control.


Management Team

The Company is led by Mr. Asha Ram Essarani, who serves as the Chief Executive Officer and holds a B.E. in Civil Engineering. Key responsibility for managerial oversight and strategic decision-making rests with Dr. Tara Chand Essarani, a medical doctor by profession, member of the Pakistan Sugar Mills Association, and CEO of Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills Limited and United Ethanol Industries Limited. Dr. Tara Chand brings over 20 years of experience in the sugar industry and is supported by Mr. Saqib Ghaffar, Chief Financial Officer and Fellow Chartered Accountant with over 30 years of experience, and Mr. Haider Bux Rustamani, Resident Director, who has more than 25 years of industry experience.


Effectiveness

The Company does not have formal management committees in place; however, fortnightly meetings are held to review business performance and discuss changes in the organizational structure, with the CEO and all Heads of Departments in attendance. Additional meetings are convened as needed to address urgent or specific matters.


MIS

The Company has implemented an ERP system from Cosmosoft, enabling integrated management of operations, finance, and reporting to support timely and informed decision-making.


Control Environment

Oversight and effective management of the Company are maintained through the internal audit department at the group level, which provides independent review of operational, financial, and compliance activities. The department is headed by Mr. Muhammad Moin, serving as the Group Internal Auditor and responsible for monitoring controls, managing risks, and ensuring governance across all group entities.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During the current crushing season, the absence of an announced support price has resulted in partial deregulation, with sugarcane procurement remaining market-driven and reflecting an increase in input costs compared to the previous year. While improved crop yields, better sucrose recovery, and expanded cultivation are expected to result in higher sugar production, the availability of carryover and imported stocks is likely to create a supply surplus in the domestic market. This anticipated oversupply may exert downward pressure on sugar prices at a time when mills are already facing elevated raw material costs and a rigid taxation structure, thereby compressing margins and weakening cash flow generation capacity. The resulting imbalance between cost escalation and price realization heightens liquidity and working capital risks, particularly for leveraged players, and may lead to sector-wide financial stress post-crushing season. In this backdrop, the pace and effectiveness of further deregulation, along with policy coordination among key stakeholders, will remain critical determinants of price stability and overall industry risk profile.


Relative Position

The industry is highly fragmented, with a large number of competitors, resulting in relatively low market shares for individual companies. The Company held a production market share of ~1.5% during MY25, reflecting its standing within the sector.


Revenues

During MY25, the Company recorded total sales of ~PKR 12.47 billion, compared with ~PKR 14.03 billion in MY24, primarily reflecting a decline in domestic sales. Local sales contributed ~PKR 11.73 billion in MY25, down from ~PKR 13.83 billion in the previous year, while export sales increased to ~PKR 742 million from ~PKR 205 million in MY24, indicating growth in international markets.


Margins

During MY25, the Company’s profitability indicators demonstrated improvement across all levels. Gross margin increased to ~3.1% (MY24: ~12.6%), supported by higher average selling prices despite lower sales volumes. Operating margin also strengthened marginally to ~11.4% compared to ~11.2% in MY24, reflecting stable operating efficiency and controlled overheads. Net profit rose significantly to ~PKR 552 million (MY24: ~PKR 145 million), primarily attributable to a substantial decline in finance costs amid a more accommodative monetary environment. Consequently, net margin improved to ~4.4% from ~1.0% in the preceding year, indicating a notable recovery in bottom-line performance.


Sustainability

Looking ahead, management aims to strengthen business performance by emphasizing operational efficiency and optimization of existing resources. The Company does not have any major expansion plans in the near term, focusing instead on sustainable growth, cost management, and improving overall productivity to maintain long-term stability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

During MY25, the Company’s working capital cycle remained broadly stable, reflecting prudent liquidity management. Inventory days marginally increased to ~45 days (MY24: ~44 days), leading to a slight rise in gross working capital days to ~46 days from ~44 days in the preceding year. Trade payable days also increased to ~8 days compared to ~6 days in MY24, providing modest support to cash flow management. Consequently, net working capital days remained steady at ~38 days, indicating continued efficiency in managing operational liquidity and short-term funding requirements.


Coverages

During MY25, the Company’s Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) stood at ~PKR 1,756 million (MY24: ~PKR 1,773 million), remaining largely stable year-on-year. Coverage indicators improved meaningfully, primarily driven by a significant reduction in finance costs. Interest coverage strengthened to ~3.3x compared to ~1.7x in MY24, while total coverage improved to ~1.0x from ~0.7x in the preceding year. Debt payback metrics also reflected improvement, declining to ~2.2x from ~5.3x in MY24, indicating enhanced debt servicing capacity and improved financial flexibility.


Capitalization

As at MY25, the Company maintained a moderately leveraged capital structure, with the leveraging ratio declining to ~30.1% from ~36.7% in MY24, reflecting improved capitalization and partial deleveraging. Total debt stood at ~PKR 1.56 billion, comprising short-term borrowings representing ~27.3% of the total debt portfolio, while long-term borrowings, primarily obtained to finance BMR initiatives, had an outstanding balance of ~PKR 458 million. The Company’s equity base strengthened to ~PKR 5,614 million as at MY25 compared to ~PKR 5,261 million in MY24, supported by profit retention during the year.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Sep-25
12M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Management Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 9,249 9,431 6,329
2. Investments 0 0 69
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,503 2,783 2,390
a. Inventories 1,497 1,585 1,766
b. Trade Receivables 31 1 8
5. Total Assets 12,752 12,214 8,788
6. Current Liabilities 3,530 2,570 1,265
a. Trade Payables 308 221 247
7. Borrowings 1,556 2,193 3,290
8. Related Party Exposure 860 860 860
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,192 1,329 686
10. Net Assets 5,614 5,261 2,687
11. Shareholders' Equity 5,614 5,261 2,687
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,474 14,034 9,185
a. Cost of Good Sold (10,837) (12,261) (7,505)
2. Gross Profit 1,637 1,773 1,680
a. Operating Expenses (219) (198) (151)
3. Operating Profit 1,418 1,575 1,529
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 50 42 (2)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,468 1,617 1,527
a. Total Finance Cost (651) (1,255) (1,041)
b. Taxation (265) (217) (162)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 552 145 324
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,756 1,773 1,885
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 986 334 908
c. Changes in Working Capital 531 1,580 425
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,517 1,915 1,333
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (467) (247) (263)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (632) (1,320) (100)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 419 347 970
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -11.1% 52.8% 76.6%
b. Gross Profit Margin 13.1% 12.6% 18.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.4% 1.0% 3.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 18.3% 23.9% 25.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 10.2% 3.6% 12.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 46 44 91
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 38 38 85
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.0 1.1 1.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.3 1.7 1.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.0 0.8 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.2 5.3 3.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 30.1% 36.7% 60.7%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 36.5 55.6 101.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 16.6% 26.3% 19.9%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com