Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Apr-26 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
09-Apr-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
09-Apr-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
10-Apr-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
11-Apr-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited was incorporated in May-91 and is listed on the PSX. The Company has diversified businesses of sugar, ethanol and storage tank terminal. The installed capacities are a) Sugar - crushing at 8,500 TCD, b) Distillery to produce 170,000liters of ethanol per day, and c) Storage tank terminal with a capacity of 22,850 M.T per month. Majority (~58%) of Al-Abbas Sugar's shareholding lies with Haji Ghani Group, which enjoys strong presence on the Board and has management control. Jahangir Siddiqui (JS) Group (~29%) is the other major shareholder. Mr. Muhammad Suleman Chawla is the Chairman of the Board, whereas, Mr. Asim Ghani serves as the Company's Chief Executive Officer.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings position Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited (AASML) as a well-established and resilient player in Pakistan’s sugar and ethanol sector. From a business analysis standpoint, the company’s diversified revenue base—spanning sugar, ethanol, and storage infrastructure—enhances earnings visibility and reduces dependence on a single income stream. The storage tank terminal operations, in particular, provide a steady, non-cyclical revenue component, strengthening cash flow stability and offering a strategic hedge against sectoral volatility. This diversification, coupled with a robust governance framework, supports operational discipline and long-term sustainability. That said, the Company remains exposed to inherent agricultural and commodity-linked risks. Variability in sugarcane yields and quality—driven by agronomic factors and cyclical production trends—can impact throughput and margins. Additionally, fluctuations in raw material prices introduce cost-side uncertainty, underscoring the importance of efficient procurement strategies, supply chain optimization, and proactive cost management to preserve profitability.
On the financial profile side, AASML's revenue mix has shifted from an ethanol-dominated profile (MY24: 64.5% ethanol, 29.3% sugar) to a more balanced composition in MY25 (51.9% ethanol, 47.7% sugar). Ethanol remains predominantly export-driven (~96%), while sugar is largely a domestic play (~92% local, ~8% export). During MY25, the Company’s topline recorded a marginal decline of ~5.4%, mainly attributable to the declining sales volume in the ethanol segment, down by ~22.9%. However, the sugar segment delivered a robust volume growth of ~38.6%, propelled by favourable market dynamics. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margin declined by ~4.3% due to the high procurement cost of sugar cane. Meanwhile, net margins were also compressed to ~8.1% as a result of a decline in net income driven by a manifold increase in taxation cost. The Company’s financial risk profile is considered moderate, supported by improved coverages and moderately leveraged capital structure. The Company’s working capital requirement is primarily financed through short-term borrowings, depicting industry norms.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company's ability to sustain margins with healthy coverages while maintaining necessary cushion and discipline in working capital management. Significant deterioration of relationship among shareholders leading to adverse impact on the Company's profile and/or excessive borrowings deteriorating the coverages will impact the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills Limited (‘Al-Abbas Sugar’ or ‘the Company’) is a public listed company, incorporated in May 1991.


Background

The company began its journey with the manufacturing and sale of white refined sugar, commencing commercial operations in December 1993. Expanding its business portfolio, the company established its first distillery plant (Unit I) in 2000, followed by a second unit (Unit II) in 2004, enhancing its ethanol production capacity. To further strengthen its supply chain and operational efficiency, the company later developed storage terminals, ensuring better inventory management and logistical support.


Operations

The Company's has a rated crushing capacity of 8,500 TCD and the distilleries have a combined capacity to produce 170,000 liters of Ethanol per day (Unit I: 85,000 Liters; Unit II: 85,000 Liters). The Company has diversified businesses and operates in two different locations at Mirpurkhas and Dhabeji in Sindh. The businesses include a) Sugar, b) Ethanol c) Chemicals and Alloys, and d) Tank Terminal. In terms of production performance, Al-Abbas sugar recorded sugar production of 38,784 MT during the fiscal year MY25. This marks a decrease of ~22.7% compared to the 50,184 MT produced in MY24, demonstrating a steady improvement in operational efficiency and output. Additionally, the sugar recovery rate, which measures the amount of sugar extracted from the sugar cane, remains stable at ~9.62% in MY25. The ethanol segment recorded the production of 40,126 MT ~3.6% lower than 43,623 MT as compared to the previous year. The Company also operates 12 tanks, having a combined storage capacity of 22,850 MT per month to store ethanol and petroleum products.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The company’s shareholding structure is highly concentrated, with associated companies and related parties holding ~33.83%, and directors and their families owning ~24.37%. Together, this gives insiders majority control, enabling strong strategic alignment but limiting minority shareholder influence. Institutional ownership remains low, with mutual funds and other financial institutions at ~4.25%, indicating limited external participation. The general public holds ~16.09%, entirely local, with no foreign investment, suggesting low international engagement. Additionally, shareholders with ~5% or more control ~83.77% of shares, reinforcing the concentrated ownership structure. While this supports stability, it may constrain liquidity and raise governance considerations. Overall, the structure reflects strong insider control with limited institutional and foreign investor presence.


Stability

The Company’s two major shareholders have been engaged in a longstanding dispute since 2013. Legal proceedings are ongoing in the Sindh High Court, and a final decision is still pending. The management, however, is confident that the outcome will be favorable to the Company, and the Company’s stability is expected to remain strong moving forward


Business Acumen

The sponsors, Haji Ghani Group, have a strong and established business track record. Mr. Haji Abdul Ghani brings extensive experience, having chaired the Boards of various brokerage firms and previously served as the Vice Chairman of the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Additionally, the Haji Ghani Group has a diversified business background, with prior involvement in the cement sector, further demonstrating its expertise in managing and expanding industrial ventures.


Financial Strength

The Company is the flagship entity of Haji Ghani Group and has maintained stable profits over the years, supported by a sufficient equity base of PKR 8.4bln as at Sep-25. Moreover, the group serves as a strong financial backbone. The sponsors possess sufficient financial strength to support the Company in times of distress, ensuring stability, continuity, and resilience against market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises nine members, including one Executive Director, three Non-Executive Directors, three Independent Directors, and two Female Directors, reflecting a balanced approach to diversity and corporate governance. The BoD is chaired by a Non-Executive Director and is significantly influenced by the Haji Ghani Family, which maintains representation through five Nominee Directors.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors (BoD) comprises highly experienced members with strong professional backgrounds, specializing in financial services as well as the sugar and ethanol industries. Their collective expertise enhances strategic decision-making and corporate governance. Mr. Muhammad Suleman Chawla currently serves as the Chairman of the BoD. He ventured into business by joining Barque Corporation, a leading FMCG distribution company in Pakistan, whose success is attributed to his dedication, passion, and leadership. Suleman has actively contributed to Pakistan’s business community, serving on the Executive Committee of the Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry (2005), as President of the SITE Association of Industries (2020), Senior Vice President of the Lasbella Chamber of Commerce & Industry, and currently as Senior Vice President of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry. His expertise in international trade, industry, finance, and the economy, combined with his commitment to national and humanitarian causes, has earned him numerous accolades. 


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors (BoD) is supported by three key committees: the Audit Committee, the HR & Remuneration Committee, and the Risk Management Committee. Mr. Haroon Askari, an Independent Director, chairs both the Audit and HR & Remuneration Committees, ensuring transparency and effective governance. Meanwhile, the Risk Management Committee is chaired by Mr. Salman Hussain Chawala, also an Independent Director, overseeing risk assessment and mitigation strategies to safeguard the company's financial and operational stability.


Financial Transparency

BDO Ebrahim & Co. Chartered Accountants as the company's external auditors. The firm is classified in category ‘A’ of SBP and have a satisfactory QCR rating. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended 30th September 2025. 


Management
Organizational Structure

Al-Abbas Sugar has a well-defined organizational structure, ensuring efficient management and clear reporting lines. Department heads report directly to the CEO, facilitating streamlined decision-making and accountability. The company operates through five key departments: Finance, Administration & Human Resources, Procurement & Purchase, Audit, and Plant Operations, each playing a crucial role in maintaining operational efficiency and business growth.


Management Team

Mr. Asim Ghani has been serving as the CEO since December 2017. Prior to this role, he oversaw the operational aspects of Al-Abbas as an Executive Director and has been associated with the company for 23 years. Having served in high-ranking capacities such as Senior Vice President of the FPCCI and Chairman of both the Pakistan Ethanol Manufacturers and Sugar Mills Associations, he has been instrumental in shaping national industrial policy. His extensive executive experience, including leadership roles at Javedan Cement and Thatta Cement, underscores a career dedicated to driving economic growth and fostering international business relations. 


Effectiveness

The long association of the Company’s senior management ensures consistency in overall policies and strengthens the management structure. However, establishement of management committees will further enhance the management profile of the Company. 


MIS

The Company has deployed Oracle R-12 as its ERP system, enabling it to generate various reports for effective management and decision-making.


Control Environment

The Internal Audit Department upholds compliance and operational efficiency by conducting quarterly evaluations to assess risks, controls, and adherence to policies. The findings are reported to the Audit Committee, ensuring transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in governance and internal processes.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately 90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. The national sugar crop for MY 2024-25 was estimated at approximately 5.83 million metric tons against domestic consumption of approximately 6.4–6.5 million metric tons, necessitating TCP imports of approximately 0.30 million MT to bridge the supply gap. Looking ahead to Season 2025-26, the national crop is estimated between 6.6–7.2 million metric tons, with early recovery data pointing to sucrose recovery rates trending higher by 0.5–1.0 percentage points year-on-year — a development that could yield incremental sugar output of 5–10% on equivalent cane crushed. However, the larger crop is expected to keep sugarcane and sugar prices under pressure, presenting challenges for the Company as it navigates a long sugar market.


Relative Position

Given the presence of numerous participants in the industry, individual companies hold relatively modest market shares. Al-Abbas Sugar notably contributes approximately 0.7% to Pakistan’s total sugar production and around 6% to the nation’s overall ethanol production, reflecting its valuable role within the sector.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue by manufacturing and selling sugar (~47.7%) and ethanol (~51.9%). Ethanol remains predominantly export-driven (~96%), while sugar is largely a domestic play (~92% local, ~8% export). During MY25, the Company's total topline decreased by ~5.4%, reporting to PKR 15.6 billion compared to PKR 16.5 billion in the corresponding period of the previous year, MY24. Out of this revenue from sugar recorded at PKR 7.4bln (MY24: PKR 4.8bln) and revenue from ethanol recorded at PKR 8.1bln (MY24: PKR 11.4bln). Looking ahead, revenue stability is anticipated, underpinned by resilient local market demand for sugar.


Margins

The Company's profitability margins reflect a decline during MY25, followed by marginal moderation in sales. The gross profit margin fell to ~17.6% (MY24: ~21.9%). This decline was primarily driven by a substantial increase in the procurement cost of sugarcane, which had a direct negative impact on the cost of production. Higher sugarcane costs reduced the overall margin from the core business operations, making it more difficult to sustain profitability at the same levels as in the previous year. This translated into a shrinking Operating profit margin (~12.1%, down from ~13.4%). Moreover, during MY25, the net margin contracted to 8.1% from ~9.4% as the profit after tax of the Company clocked at PKR 1,270mln (MY24: PKR 1,551mln). 


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company's performance will largely depend on the sugar division, and its industry dynamics. Meanwhile, the Company is expected to continue its stable performance in the ethanol division.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management has shown signs of operational inefficiencies during MY25. Inventories witnessed a decrease, averaging 87days compared to 98 days in MY24. Trade receivables marginally remain the same at 9 days on average, underscoring the Company’s efficient receivables collection practices. However, trade payables averaged 25 days, from 24 days in MY24, indicating adequate utilization of supplier credit. The Gross Working Capital cycle decreased to 95 days (MY24: 108 days), resulting in a Net Working Capital cycle of 70 days compared to 84 days in the previous period. Leverage indicators present a stable picture, with Short-Term Total Leverage remaining neutral at 56.9% (MY24: 62%).  Going forward, the working capital cycle is expected to improve due to the efficient selling of stock through export.


Coverages

The Company's coverage indicators reflected a strong performance during MY25, driven by increased FCFO and a decline in finance cost. The Company's FCFO clocked at PKR 2.1bln, (MY24: PKR 1.9bln). The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio has increased to 11.9x (MY24: 4.8x), signaling a reduced capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has improved to 9.5x from 3.7x. Going forward, the coverages are expected to remain allign with the current trend. 


Capitalization

Al-Abbas Sugar Mills maintains a low-leveraged capital structure, which is a good sign in comparison to other industry players, with a debt-to-equity ratio standing at ~26.9% in MY25 (MY24: ~24.4%). The Company's debt consists of short-term borrowings, constituting ~99%, and long term borrowing, constituting lease liabilities of ~1% of the total debt. In MY25, the total debt of the Company stood at PKR 3,094mln due to increased utilization for running finance for working capital purposes and repayment of loan. The equity base of the Company stood at ~PKR 8,395mln (MY24: ~PKR 8,001mln).


 
 

Apr-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
3M
Sep-25
12M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,598 1,573 1,435 1,466
2. Investments 6,187 7,712 1,343 2,769
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 6,178 4,619 9,368 8,211
a. Inventories 2,327 2,375 5,024 3,839
b. Trade Receivables 18 99 641 253
5. Total Assets 13,963 13,904 12,146 12,446
6. Current Liabilities 2,372 2,246 1,496 2,632
a. Trade Payables 1,196 1,102 1,066 1,090
7. Borrowings 2,862 3,094 2,584 2,763
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 165 169 64 127
10. Net Assets 8,565 8,395 8,001 6,923
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,565 8,395 8,001 6,923
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,711 15,612 16,508 14,569
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,135) (12,869) (12,896) (9,594)
2. Gross Profit 576 2,743 3,612 4,975
a. Operating Expenses (369) (848) (1,392) (571)
3. Operating Profit 207 1,895 2,219 4,404
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 162 193 70 (21)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 369 2,088 2,289 4,382
a. Total Finance Cost (55) (231) (509) (378)
b. Taxation (118) (587) (230) (320)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 196 1,270 1,551 3,685
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 143 2,119 1,863 4,147
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 39 1,931 1,482 3,985
c. Changes in Working Capital (2,642) 6,255 (2,171) (1,311)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (2,603) 8,187 (690) 2,674
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 1,629 (6,337) 1,430 (1,061)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (235) (589) (723) (1,609)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,209) 1,262 18 4
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -30.5% -5.4% 13.3% 40.6%
b. Gross Profit Margin 21.2% 17.6% 21.9% 34.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 7.2% 8.1% 9.4% 25.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -92.2% 53.6% -1.9% 19.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 9.2% 15.5% 20.8% 63.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 81 95 108 96
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 42 70 84 70
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.6 2.1 6.3 3.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 4.5 11.9 4.8 12.5
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 2.6 9.2 3.7 11.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 25.0% 26.9% 24.4% 28.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 12.8 93.7 11.3 49.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.8% 8.3% 18.2% 12.6%

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-26

www.pacra.com