Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Mar-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Mar-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
08-Apr-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
14-Apr-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
14-Apr-22 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills Limited (“Reliance Cotton" or "the Company") was incorporated as a listed company in 1991 under the umbrella of Sapphire Fibers Limited & Mills. The Company started its operations in Jul-92 and is exclusively engaged in the spinning business. A major stake of 80% is held by the Sponsors - the Sapphire Group through associated companies. Directors hold (4.4%) stake, and Financial Institutes and Joint Stock Companies hold (5.3%) stake of the Company. While the remaining stake of (10.3%) is held by the general public. The Board is chaired by Mr. Shahid Abdullah, while, Mr. Shayan Abdullah serves as the CEO. He is assisted by a team of professionals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings incorporate the eminent position of Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills Limited (“Reliance Cotton” or “the Company”) in the spinning segment of Pakistan. The Company derives strategic support from its association with the Sapphire Group (“the Group”), a well-diversified conglomerate with a strong presence across the textile value chain, with interests in retail, dairy, and energy segments. Reliance Cotton is renowned nationally and internationally for its high-quality yarn, offering a range from 6 Ne to 80 Ne, including single & double yarns, plied, slubs, mélanges, and blends. Reliance Cotton has an established and diversified customer base spanning over international markets—including America, Australia, Africa, Asia, and Europe—and is trusted by major textile and export garment manufacturers within the local markets. The current installed capacity is 59,232 spindles.
The economic environment in Pakistan during late FY25 and 1HFY26 showed signs of improvement, reflected in lower interest rates and a relatively stable exchange rate. However, the textile industry continues to face challenges from high energy costs, elevated taxation, and limited domestic cotton supply. In response, management is focused on renewable energy sources and synergies through group restructuring. These initiatives, combined with prudent capital allocation and a well-diversified investment portfolio, are expected to support resilient, long-term growth. During FY25, the Company recorded a marginal revenue growth of 5.3%, reaching PKR 15.8bln (FY24: PKR 15bln; 6MFY26: PKR 7.3bln). The revenue composition reflects a strategic shift from a predominantly export-oriented base to local sales, which constituted ~82% of the total gross sales. This transition underscores the Company’s focus on more favorable local price dynamics, strengthening its domestic market footprint.
The Company maintains a supportive business risk profile, reinforced by a stable cushion from investment income. As of Dec'26, Reliance Cotton holds an investment portfolio of PKR 3.2bln, primarily in the subsidiaries and associated companies of the Sapphire Group. Its subsidiary, Sapphire Electronics, is engaged in the manufacturing and assembly of Samsung-branded products and home appliances. The Company maintains a moderately leveraged capital structure with a well-managed working capital, supplementing the financial risk profile. Cash flows and coverage metrics are considered adequate. Currently, a group-level restructuring is underway to streamline operations and enhance organizational efficiency.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings depend on consistent improvement in the Company’s profitability. Prudent administration of the investment book continues to hold importance. The sustainability of coverages and stable generation of cash flows from core consolidated operations remain critical for the assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills Limited (‘Reliance Cotton’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in Jul-91 as a public limited company, listed on PSX. The Company's stocks are traded with a symbol of RCML.


Background

In 1970, Sapphire Group ('the Group') entered in the business arena by setting up small textile ventures. Over time, the Group has become a renowned name and an intergrated textile player that has expanded its local and international reach. The Group holds interests in dairy, power generation, and textile and retail segments. The Company was established in 1991 and started production in Jul-92.


Operations

Reliance Cotton is engaged in the production and selling of high-quality yarn; 6 Ne to 80 Ne (single & double), plied, Slubs, melanges, blends and variety of yarns. The Company has 59,232 spindles and a production capacity of  44.5mln pounds per annum. The production facilities are located in Sheikhupura, while the head office is located in Lahore.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Major stake (80%) in the Company is held by the Group through associated companies and related parties. Directors hold (4.4%) stake, Financial Institutes and Joint stock Companies hold (5.3%) stake, While, the remaining (10.3%) stake is held by the General Public.


Stability

The Company's ownership structure is expected to remain stable as the sponsors are among the well-established investors in Pakistan.


Business Acumen

The Group is one of the largest vertically integrated textiles setups in Pakistan and holds interests in dairy, power generation, and textile and retail segments.


Financial Strength

The Company gathers financial strength from the Group, if needed. PACRA rates other group entities aswell, namely: Diamond Fabrics Ltd.(A-/A2), Sapphire Fibres Ltd.(A+/A1), Sapphire Finishing Mills Ltd.(A/A1), Sapphire Retail Ltd.(A-/A2) and Sapphire Dairies (Pvt) Limited (A-/A).


Governance
Board Structure

Overall control of the Company lies with the seven member board, comprising one Executive, four Non-Executive, two Independent Directors. The BoD has a dominating presence of sponsoring family with one female Director.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Shahid Abdullah, the Chairman, has been associated with the Group since 1980 and possesses extensive expertise across the textile value chain, including spinning, weaving, knitting, dyeing, finishing, and power generation. He also serves as the CEO of Sapphire Fibres Limited and Sapphire Electric Company Limited. Mr. Shayan Abdullah has been serving as the Chief Executive Officer of Reliance Cotton Spinning Mills Limited for the past eleven years and is also a Director at Sapphire Fibres Limited. In his capacity, he oversees raw material procurement, accounts, and marketing for the spinning divisions of Sapphire Fibres Limited. Mr. Amer Abdullah, a Non-Executive Director, has been associated with the group since 1990 and currently serves as the CEO of Diamond Fabrics Limited and Sapphire Dairies. Mr. Yousuf Abdullah, also a Non-Executive Director, serves as the CEO of Sapphire Finishing Mills Limited and sits on the boards of other group companies. Mr. Nabeel Abdullah, a Non-Executive Director, oversees raw material procurement, sales, production, accounts, and finance at Sapphire Textile Mills Limited, with a particular focus on the weaving segment.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD met five times during the year. The BoD meetings had full attendance and minutes are properly recorded. Three subcommittees - Audit Committee, Risk Committee and Human Resource Committee - assists the BoD in relevant decision and policy formation matters. Audit and Human Resource Committees are chaired by an Independent Director. While, the Risk Committee is chaired by the Chairman.


Financial Transparency

External Auditors - M/S. Shinewing Hameed Chaudhri & Co. Chartered Accountants issued an unqualified audit report on financial statements for FY25. The audit firm is QCR rated and on SBP's panel in category "A".


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company’s overall operations are managed by eleven key management personnel including the CEO. Three of them are designated as employed Directors. All departmental heads reports to the COO, who then reports to the CEO. The CEO reports to the BoD. However, head of internal audit and human resource reports administratively to the CEO and functionally to the respective BoD committee.


Management Team

Mr. Shayan Abdullah, is the CEO of the Company for the last 11 years. Mr. Farrukh Raza Bashir, an Executive Director, possesses 38 years of industry experience. Mr. Jawwad Faisal, Director Finance, is an FCA and possesses ~23 years of experience. They are assisted by an experience management team.


Effectiveness

The Company lacks presence of management committees. However, MIS reports relating to daily operations are generated and submitted to senior management for discussion on regular basis. Furthermore, there are regular need-based meetings to proactively manage the affairs.


MIS

Reliance Cotton has deployed an Oracle-based ERP solution – Oracle E-business suite – for quality information to control and maintain efficient operations. The Company’s monthly MIS comprises comprehensive performance reports which are reviewed frequently by the senior management.


Control Environment

RCML has outsourced internal audit function to M/S. KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co., who coordinates and reports to the Board Audit Committee (BAC). The Company has set up effective mechanisms for identifying, assessing, and reporting all types of risks arising from the business operations. These risks include strategic, operational, financial, or compliance risks, which may compromise achieving the Group's overall business objectives.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Textile exports reached USD 17.9bln in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7bln the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14bln, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8bln and the spinning segment at USD 0.7bln. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1mln square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% YoY), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (compared to approximately 7.8% in FY24). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, internat ional cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could Lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases. Considering the current climate change, flooding in major cotton regions, and shifting crop patterns, the target of approximately 10.2mln bales for FY26 appears challenging.


Relative Position

The Group holds strong presence in the country’s textile sector, while Reliance Cotton with 59,232 spindles acquires a position in the middle tier players of the spinning segment.


Revenues

During FY25, the Company’s topline reached PKR 15.8bln (FY24: PKR 15.0bln), reflecting an increase of approximately 5%, primarily driven by higher local sales. However, export sales posted a declining trend, with exports standing at PKR 3.2bln in FY25 compared to PKR 11.9bln in FY24, marking a significant decline of around 73%. Nevertheless, improved pricing and stronger local demand supported the overall performance. During 6MFY26, the Company generated a topline of approximately PKR 7.3bln. Going forward, the revenue stream is expected to remain stable.


Margins

The gross profit margin declined to 12.2% during FY25 (FY24: 14.8%), primarily due to an increase in raw material costs. The Company’s operating profit margin also decreased and stood at 8.0% in FY25 (FY24: ~12.0%), mainly attributable to higher operating expenses. Consequently, the net profit margin declined to 4.5% (FY24: 8.7%) due to an increased tax burden. During 6MFY26, the Company reported an improved gross profit margin of 14.3%, operating profit margim of 10% and net profit margin of 4.2%. Going forward, the Company needs to focus on managing raw material and operating costs to sustain its margins.


Sustainability

The Group has a well-established mark in the textile segment. Reliance Cotton has to strengthen its footprint along with a capacity expansion that streamlines the conversion costs. The Company must instill flexible plans to overcome operational challenges. However, regular BMR in the spinning and weaving segments during FY25 are likely to have a positive impact on productivity, going forward


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are met through a combination of internal cash generation and bank borrowings. Net working capital days improved to 174 days (FY24: 184 days), primarily due to reduced inventory holding. Inventory days decreased to 132 days (FY24: 147 days). Trade payable days declined to 7 days (FY24: 14 days), while trade receivable days slightly improved to 49 days (FY24: 51 days). As of 6MFY26, working capital cycle stood at 186 days. The Company maintains a comfortable borrowing cushion on its balance sheet.


Coverages

Interest coverage remains a function of the Company’s free cash flows and finance costs. During FY25, the Company reported Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) of approximately PKR 1.7bln (FY24: PKR 2.5bln). The decline in FCFO is primarily attributable to relatively lower profitability levels and increased cost pressures during the period. The Company’s interest coverage ratio stood at 2.8x in FY25 (FY24: 2.7x), reflecting a slight improvement and indicating the Company’s adequate capacity to meet its finance costs from operational earnings. However, coverage levels remain moderately stretched and remain sensitive to further increases in borrowing costs or deterioration in profitability margins. The Company’s debt payback ratio improved slightly and stood at 1.7x in FY25 (FY24: 1.6x), reflecting the Company’s reasonable ability to repay its borrowings through internally generated cash flows. As of 6MFY26, the Company's debt coverage stood at 1.7x. Going forward, maintaining stable profitability margins, prudent financial discipline, and controlled borrowing levels will remain critical to sustaining the Company’s coverage ratios.


Capitalization

As of FY25, the Company’s debt-to-equity ratio stood at 42.1% (FY24: 43.4%), reflecting a relatively stable leverage position. Total borrowings increased to PKR 6.8bln (FY24: PKR 6.6bln), primarily due to higher short-term borrowings (STBs), which rose to PKR 4.6bln (FY24: PKR 3.4bln) to support working capital requirements. Meanwhile, the Company’s equity base strengthened to PKR 9.3bln (FY24: PKR 8.6bln), supported by higher profit retention. As of Dec-26, the Company’s equity stood at PKR 9.7bln with debt-to-equity ratio of 48.5%, indicating relatively elevated leverage levels. Going forward, sustaining a balanced capital structure will remain essential to maintaining financial stability and supporting growth.


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,968 5,506 6,719 3,600
2. Investments 545 457 199 14
3. Related Party Exposure 6,095 3,758 1,056 518
4. Current Assets 10,142 9,277 9,749 9,251
a. Inventories 6,166 5,493 5,906 6,203
b. Trade Receivables 1,982 2,062 2,196 2,013
5. Total Assets 21,750 18,998 17,723 13,384
6. Current Liabilities 2,670 2,575 2,293 1,911
a. Trade Payables 398 354 244 891
7. Borrowings 9,118 6,818 6,620 4,297
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 262 226 180 142
10. Net Assets 9,699 9,379 8,630 7,034
11. Shareholders' Equity 9,700 9,379 8,631 7,034
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,350 15,816 15,069 11,049
a. Cost of Good Sold (6,298) (13,885) (12,832) (9,343)
2. Gross Profit 1,052 1,932 2,237 1,705
a. Operating Expenses (320) (659) (424) (353)
3. Operating Profit 732 1,273 1,813 1,352
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 191 473 518 4
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 923 1,746 2,331 1,356
a. Total Finance Cost (415) (642) (970) (351)
b. Taxation (203) (396) (46) (166)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 305 708 1,315 839
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 997 1,736 2,548 1,427
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 636 1,004 1,511 1,139
c. Changes in Working Capital (2,692) (454) 950 (1,212)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (2,056) 550 2,461 (72)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (295) (630) (542) (1,086)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 2,237 352 (1,847) 1,329
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (115) 273 72 171
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -7.1% 5.0% 36.4% -3.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.3% 12.2% 14.8% 15.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.2% 4.5% 8.7% 7.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -23.1% 8.1% 23.2% 1.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.4% 7.9% 16.8% 12.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 195 181 198 243
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 186 174 184 218
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.8 3.6 4.3 4.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.0 3.2 2.4 5.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.5 1.9 2.0 1.8
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 48.5% 42.1% 43.4% 37.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 48.5 47.2 81.0 106.8
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.0% 10.4% 17.8% 9.2%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com