Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Mar-26 BBB- A2 Stable Maintain -
28-Mar-25 BBB- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Mar-24 BBB- A2 Stable Maintain -
29-Mar-23 BBB- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

H.A.R Fibres (Pvt) Limited ('H.A.R Fibres' or 'the Company') was established in 2018. The Company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of yarn and operates a single spinning unit. Mr. Shahid Mehmood Sheikh owns a ~40% shares of the Company. While the remaining stake is equally divided among his sons: Mr. Haroon Shahid, Mr. Faizan Shahid & Mr. Adan Shahid. The Board is chaired by Mr. Shahid Mehmood Sheikh. Mr. Shahid is also the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company and is assisted by an experienced team.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of H.A.R Fibres (Pvt) Limited (“H.A.R Fibres” or “the Company”) reflect its adequate standing within the spinning segment of Pakistan’s textile industry. The Company operates with an installed capacity of approximately 20,000 spindles, primarily producing carded yarn. The product portfolio comprises coarse-count yarn ranging from 4s to 30s, offered in three principal blends: Cotton, Polyester-Cotton, and Viscose, catering mainly to the domestic market. The Company fulfills its energy requirements through grid and a 1MW solar plant.
The Company maintains a diversified raw material procurement strategy. A substantial portion of its key inputs, including polyester, viscose, and lyocell fibers, is sourced from international suppliers, primarily in China, Thailand, and Indonesia. The remaining raw cotton requirements are met through local sourcing from Sindh and Punjab. This procurement mix provides flexibility in managing input availability, while exposing the Company to external supply dynamics and foreign exchange movements. During FY25, the Company’s topline declined by ~10.5%, reaching PKR 832mln (FY24: PKR 930mln; 6MFY26: PKR 436mln). The decline in revenue reflects prevailing demand dynamics within the spinning segment and competitive pressures in the domestic yarn market. Currently, the Company’s sales are entirely concentrated in the local market, with no export contribution.
From a financial risk perspective, the Company’s liquidity profile is supported by moderate coverage indicators, providing adequate support to meet its working capital requirements. The capital structure remains conservatively leveraged. The Company’s outstanding borrowings displayed an easing trend, indicating a strategic reduction in debt exposure. The sponsors’ experience and demonstrated ability to navigate challenging industry cycles remain supportive factors for the ratings. Going forward, the Company’s ability to broaden its customer base, improve operational efficiencies to support margins, and sustain a prudent financial risk profile will remain important considerations. Strengthening and formalizing the governance framework would enhance oversight and decision-making processes, which, in turn, is expected to support the sustainable growth and overall performance of H.A.R Fibres.
Pakistan’s textile exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, while the spinning segment continued to operate under a highly competitive and margin-sensitive environment. The progressive decline in policy rates provided relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics and offering some cushion to debt-servicing metrics across the sector. In parallel, energy efficiency initiatives, particularly solarization, have emerged as a key structural differentiator, enabling relatively stronger cost positioning and margin resilience for companies with early investments in renewable energy.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent upon the management’s ability to improve margins, profitability, and financial profile of the Company. This includes keeping the debt levels manageable and improving the business profile of the Company, going forward. Improvement in the governance framework remains important for the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

H.A.R Fibres (Private) Limited (‘H.A.R Fibres’ or ‘the Company’) was incorporated in Jun-18 under the Companies Act, 2017.


Background

H.A.R Fibres is a venture of the Shahid Family that holds interests in yarn trading in Faisalabad. The Company is a part of H.A.R Group, with H.A.R Textile Mills (Pvt.) Limited is the other group company, which has been operational since 1958.


Operations

H.A.R Fibres specializes in yarn manufacturing and distribution, headquartered near Faisalabad's Clock Tower. Its manufacturing plant is located in Mohalla Mughalpura, Naya Lahore, and houses approximately 20,000 spindles and 1,320 rotors ensuring operational efficiency and accessibility to key resources and markets.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Mr. Shahid Mehmood Sheikh possesses ~40% stake in the Company. The remaining ownership is distributed among his sons: Mr. Haroon Shahid (~20%), Mr. Faizan Shahid (~20%), and Mr. Adan Shahid (~20%).


Stability

H.A.R inherits the technical and business expertise from the first generation to the second generation of the Shahid family, combining the guidance and knowledge of the founders with the new generation. However, a formal succession plan requires to be documented.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family is interested in textiles and investing in the real estate sector. The sponsors have vast experience and knowledge of various aspects of the textile value chain and have witnessed many businesses over a span of more than four decades.


Financial Strength

The Sponsors possess significant financial strength to support the Company, if required, going forward.


Governance
Board Structure

The four-member board of directors (BoD) is dominated by the Sponsoring family and comprises an Executive Director and three Non-Executive Directors. The BoD's decision-making process can be strengthened by the inclusion of an Independent director.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Shahid Mehmood Sheikh, the BoDs Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), has been in the yarn trading business for the last 46 years and enjoys a good reputation in the business community. Mr. Haroon Shahid, Non-Executive Director, has an overall experience of more than two decades in yarn manufacturing and trading and has been associated with the Company for 5 years. All other Board members are qualified in different disciplines and have ample experience in textile and other industries.


Board Effectiveness

The absence of a structured system for recording BoD minutes highlights a need for improvement in the overall governance framework. Moreover, there is a lack of BoD committees to facilitate the decision-making process.


Financial Transparency

Zahid Jamil & Co., the Company’s external auditors, is a QCR-rated audit firm and holds a Category ‘B’ listing with the State Bank of Pakistan. They issued a qualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for FY25, due to the non-recognition of employees’ retirement benefits in accordance with applicable Pakistani laws.


Management
Organizational Structure

H.A.R Fibres organizational framework comprises three primary departments: i) Finance, Admin & Marketing, ii) Purchase, and iii) Production. Each department is headed by a respective head, who reports to the Executive Directors, who reports to the CEO. The CEO makes the pertinent decisions and is considered the man at the last mile.


Management Team

Mr. Shahid Mehmood Sheikh holds the position of CEO. He has been in the yarn trading business for the last 46 years and enjoys a good reputation in the business community. Mr. Ejaz Ali, the CFO, has more than three decades of experience and has been associated with the Company for five years. They are assisted by a team of professionals.


Effectiveness

The Company has no management committees. The Sponsor's close involvement in day-to-day business affairs bodes well for the effectiveness of the Company.


MIS

H.A.R Fibres has built an in-house oracle to cater to the business needs. The senior management monitors the business performance through certain Key MIS reports.


Control Environment

Production is completely order driven, and the QC department conducts a rigorous quality check on the end product. The Company has obtained ISO 9001 certification.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Textile exports reached USD 17.9bln in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7bln the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14bln, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8bln and the spinning segment at USD 0.7bln. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1mln square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% YoY), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (compared to approximately 7.8% in FY24). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, internat ional cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could Lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases. Considering the current climate change, flooding in major cotton regions, and shifting crop patterns, the target of approximately 10.2mln bales for FY26 appears challenging.


Relative Position

With its operational spindle count of 20,000, H.A.R Fibers is categorized as a relatively small player in Pakistan's spinning sector.


Revenues

H.A.R Fibres reported a revenue of PKR 832mln during FY25, reflecting a decline of 10.5% compared to PKR 930mln in FY24. The Company lacks a dedicated brand-specific customer base and distributes its entire production in Faisalabad through sales brokers. H.A.R Fibres is exposed to significant customer concentration risk as it relies solely on local yarn sales. During 6MFY26, the Revenue was Reported at PKR 436mln. However, going forward, revenue is expected to improve, supported by the anticipated recovery in the country’s economic conditions.


Margins

During FY25, the cost of goods sold decreased in line with the decline in revenue and was reported at PKR 479mln (FY24: PKR 832mln), resulting in a gross profit of PKR 83mln (FY24: PKR 92mln). The gross margin remained stable at 10.0%. Net profit improved significantly to PKR 36mln (FY24: PKR 3mln), translating into a net profit margin of 4.4% (FY24: 0.3%). During 6MFY26, the Company reported further improvement in profitability, with gross and net profit margins recorded at 12.8% and 6.3%, respectively. Going forward, margins are expected to improve, supported by the declining policy rate and the Company’s gradual transition towards solar energy, which is likely to reduce energy costs.


Sustainability

Going forward, the Company does not have any plans for a BMR. While past initiatives have focused on efficiency improvements, there are currently no capital expenditure projects aimed at expanding production capacity. However, H.A.R Fibres intends to install additional solar panels to further enhance cost efficiency.


Financial Risk
Working capital

As of FY25, increased demand led to an improvement in inventory management, with inventory turnover days reducing to 511 days (FY24: 610 days). Trade receivable days slightly increased to 32 days (FY24: 31 days), reflecting largely stable collection efficiency. Meanwhile, trade payable days increased to 227 days (FY24: 199 days), indicating a moderate ability of the Company to negotiate favorable credit terms from suppliers. The combined effect of lower inventory days, relatively stable receivable days, and extended payable days resulted in an improvement in the net working capital cycle, which reduced to 315 days (FY24: 442 days). During 6MFY26, the Company’s net working capital cycle further improved to 222 days. The Company’s borrowing cushion remains moderate.


Coverages

As of FY25, the Company’s Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) was reported at PKR 77mln (FY24: PKR 90mln). Finance cost decline to PKR 7mln (FY24: PKR 13mln). This reduction in finance cost resulted in an improvement in FCFO-to-finance cost coverage, which stood at 26.1x (FY24: 23.1x). Going forward, coverage indicators are expected to strengthen further, supported by the anticipated decline in finance costs.


Capitalization

As of FY24, the Company reported a decline in total borrowings by 2.4%, reported at PKR 162mln (FY24: PKR 166mln), primarily due to a decrease in long-term borrowings reported at PKR 20mln (FY24: PKR 40mln). Shareholders’ equity increased by 7.1%, reported at PKR 627mln (FY24: PKR 585mln), resulting in an improvement in the Company’s leverage reported at 25.2% (FY24: 27.4%).


 
 

Mar-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 366 384 399 383
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,153 1,293 1,792 1,461
a. Inventories 818 1,001 1,326 1,056
b. Trade Receivables 106 62 84 76
5. Total Assets 1,519 1,677 2,192 1,844
6. Current Liabilities 648 818 1,354 1,117
a. Trade Payables 400 528 507 507
7. Borrowings 151 162 166 170
8. Related Party Exposure 46 49 55 59
9. Non-Current Liabilities 21 21 31 6
10. Net Assets 654 627 585 492
11. Shareholders' Equity 654 627 585 492
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 436 832 930 693
a. Cost of Good Sold (380) (749) (838) (632)
2. Gross Profit 56 83 92 61
a. Operating Expenses (11) (25) (26) (30)
3. Operating Profit 45 59 66 30
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (8) (14) (14) 18
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 37 44 53 48
a. Total Finance Cost (4) (7) (13) (22)
b. Taxation (5) (0) (37) (2)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 27 36 3 24
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 33 77 90 38
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 33 69 78 16
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 (31) (152) 76
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 33 38 (74) 92
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (21) (45) (197)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (16) 70 103
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 33 1 (50) (2)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 4.8% -10.6% 34.3% -51.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.8% 10.0% 9.9% 8.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 6.3% 4.4% 0.3% 3.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 7.5% 5.5% -6.7% 16.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.5% 6.0% 0.5% 5.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 416 543 641 390
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 222 315 442 183
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 31.5 32.2 24.6 12.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.5 2.4 2.1 5.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 23.1% 25.2% 27.4% 31.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 1.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3%

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

Mar-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-26

www.pacra.com