Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
30-Apr-26 A A1 Stable Maintain -
02-May-25 A A1 Stable Maintain YES
24-May-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
24-May-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Jun-22 A A1 Developing Maintain YES
About the Entity

MGEL is part of the Master Group, a diversified industrial conglomerate with over 50 years of history, originating with Master Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd in 1963 pioneers in Pakistan's foam industry. The Group has since expanded into textiles, engineering, automobiles, and retail. MGEL's project cost totaled USD 65.03mln, financed 80% through debt (USD 52mln) from local and international institutions. The Company is led by CEO Mr. Shahzad Malik, overseeing the Group's energy ventures, and COO Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, who brings 23+ years of experience in energy and transaction advisory.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Master Green Energy Limited (“MGEL” or “the company”) reflects its association with Master Group, a pioneer in foam products in Pakistan, which has successfully diversified into the renewable energy sector, first through Master Wind Energy Limited in Jhimpir, Sindh, and subsequently through the installation of this 50MW wind power project in District Jamshoro, Sindh. The Group's established track record and financial backing provide an important layer of comfort to the overall credit profile of MGEL. The project commenced construction in September 2019 and achieved its Commercial Operations Date (COD) in August 2021. During the period, following the Government of Pakistan's broader initiative to renegotiate and amend Power Purchase Agreements across the IPP sector, MGEL successfully executed an amendment to its PPA, which has strengthened the Company's operational and financial framework going forward. MGEL operates under a 25-year Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with Central Power Purchasing Agency Guarantee Limited (CPPA-G), under which the power purchaser is obligated to pay for any non-project missed volumes at the applicable tariff rate, with energy payments secured through CPPA-G and backed by the sovereign guarantee of the Government of Pakistan. The project's revenues and cash flows are primarily exposed to wind risk and operational risk. While wind variability is borne by the Company — introducing seasonality in cash flows — operational risks are mitigated through adherence to performance benchmarks for availability and efficiency as outlined in the EPA. The EPC contract was awarded to Hydro China International Engineering Company Limited and Hangzhou Huachen Electric Power Control Company, while the Company has secured long-term Operations and Maintenance (O&M) agreements with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Pvt. Limited and Albario Engineering Pvt. Limited, whose international and local experience provides added operational reliability. During 1HFY26, MGEL delivered 69.57 GWh of electricity to the national grid, reflecting a notable improvement compared to 52.12 GWh in 1HFY25, primarily driven by improved wind conditions with average wind speeds rising to 6.62 m/s from 6.01 m/s in the corresponding period last year. This recovery translated into a strong rebound in profitability, with the Company posting a net income of PKR 277 million in 1HFY26 compared to a loss reported in FY25, while Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) improved to approximately PKR 863 million and the interest coverage ratio strengthened to 2.68x. To support working capital requirements, the Company has access to short-term borrowing facilities, with utilization of PKR 270 million against the PKR 300 million limit during 1HFY26. As of December 2025, MGEL has repaid nineteen quarterly installments of its project-related long-term debt in a timely manner, without any forbearance period. Although leverage remains sizable at 69.3% (FY25: 72.3%), it continues to decline steadily in line with the project's life cycle, with further comfort drawn from the standby letter of credit (SBLC) equal to two quarterly installments maintained for the entire loan term as per financing agreements.

Key Rating Drivers

The Company's performance remains inherently linked to wind availability, and any sustained decline in wind speeds affecting debt servicing capacity will continue to be a critical consideration; however, historical performance patterns, along with the expectation of sponsor support if required, remain important factors underpinning the current rating

Profile
Plant

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL), incorporated in May 2015, is a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP) company operating under Pakistan’s Renewable Energy Policy 2006. It represents the Master Group’s second venture in the wind energy sector, following the successful development of Master Wind Energy Limited. The company has developed a 50 MW wind power project on a Build, Own, and Operate (BOO) model, located at Goth Dehson Walhar, District Jamshoro. Spanning around 300 acres of land leased from the Department of Energy Government of Sindh (DOEGOS) 30 years, the project supports the national agenda of promoting sustainable energy. MGEL was granted its generation license by NEPRA on November 27, 2017, and the plant commenced commercial operations on August 21, 2021.


Tariff

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) operates under a cost-plus tariff framework awarded by NEPRA for wind power projects. As per NEPRA’s 2019 tariff determination for wind-based Independent Power Producers (IPPs), MGEL’s approved generation tariff is PKR 7.2396 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for years 1–10, and PKR 2.3726 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for years 11–25 of the project life. The levelized tariff for the project stands at US¢ 4.7227 per kWh, equivalent to PKR 5.667 per kWh..  During the current period, the applicable tariff remained elevated due to indexation adjustments, with the revised tariff standing at PKR 13.7362/kWh for October–December 2025 and PKR 13.6120/kWh for January–March 2026.


Return on Project

The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for Master Green Energy Limited’s 50 MW wind power project, as approved by NEPRA, is 14%. The project’s primary revenue stream is the sale of electricity to the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA-G) under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) is wholly owned by Master Group, with 99.99% of its shareholding held by associated companies. The ownership is equally divided among three brothers through their respective holding companies: Nadeem Malik Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd., NM Holding (Pvt.) Ltd., and Najeeb Holdings (Pvt.) Ltd., each holding 25.67%. Additionally, Master Textile Mills Ltd. holds a 23% stake, reflecting the Group’s consolidated investment in MGEL through internal shareholding.


Stability

Master Group, the parent company of MGEL, brings over 50 years of business legacy and stability. Established in 1963 with its flagship company Master Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd., the Group began with foam products and later expanded through Master Celeste, launching premium bedding solutions in Pakistan. Over the decades, the Group has successfully diversified into textiles, engineering, automobiles, and retail, establishing itself as one of Pakistan’s leading industrial conglomerates. This long-standing presence and diversified portfolio reflect strong, stable, and experienced ownership behind MGEL


Business Acumen

Master Group’s strong business acumen is reflected in its successful diversification across multiple industries beyond its origins in foam manufacturing. The Group maintains a well-established presence through Master Textile in the textile sector, Master Motors in the automotive industry, and Procon Engineering, which caters to global automotive brands. In addition, Celeste represents the Group’s positioning in the premium sleep solutions segment, while Master Offisys highlights its footprint in the retail and office furniture space. The Group has also expanded into the technology domain through Indus Cloud, further strengthening its diversified portfolio. This broad-based presence underscores the Group’s strategic vision, operational resilience, and ability to adapt to evolving market dynamics, thereby providing strong managerial and financial support to Master Green Energy Limited.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) possess strong financial strength, supported by a diversified portfolio of well-established and profitable businesses. Their stable revenue streams across multiple sectors, including textiles, automotive, engineering, and consumer goods and, provide a solid foundation for the Company’s long-term sustainability and financial commitments.


Governance
Board Structure

MGEL’s Board of Directors consists of three members, all representing the Master Group. The board includes the Chairman, who also serves as the Managing Director, one Executive Director, and one Non-Executive Director. This structure ensures effective oversight, strategic direction, and alignment with the Group’s vision.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Nadeem Malik is the Chairman of the Board of Master Green Energy Limited and has been associated with the Master Group for over three decades, serving as Chairman across various Group companies. He brings extensive leadership experience and strategic vision to the Board. Mr. Najeeb Malik, also a long-standing member of the Master Group, currently serves as a Director on the Board of MGEL and contributes to the company's governance and strategic planning


Board Effectiveness

The experience and leadership of MGEL’s Board of Directors play a key role in guiding the company’s strategic direction. Their deep understanding of business operations and financial management supports the development of effective operational and financial policies, ensuring strong governance and long-term sustainability of the project


Financial Transparency

Master Green Energy Limited upholds strong financial transparency through regular audits conducted by Yousuf Adil, Chartered Accountants, one of Pakistan’s leading audit firms, who served as the Company’s auditors for both June 2025 and 1HFY2026.  Auditor has expressed unqualified opinion on the financials of june 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

MGEL has a lean organizational structure. The company has a well-defined lean organizational structure with a professional management team in place to monitor the operations and assure control mechanisms.


Management Team

The management team of Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) comprises experienced professionals with proven leadership across diverse industries. Mr. Shahzad Malik, Managing Director & CEO, holds an MBA from Bentley University, USA, and has over a decade of experience in the foam and renewable energy sectors. He has modernized the Group’s foam business, expanded its global footprint, and also is leading the Master Wind Energy Limited while serving on the boards of various Master Group companies. Mr. Rumman Arshad Dar, Chief Operating Officer, brings over 20 years of experience in the finance and energy sectors.


Effectiveness

MGEL’s board effectiveness is reflected in its strong governance, strategic oversight, and commitment to long-term value creation. The board plays a vital role in guiding the company’s vision, ensuring accountability, and supporting the executive team in key decisions. Its diverse expertise and active involvement have contributed to transparent, timely, and well-informed decision-making, fostering sustainable growth and organizational resilience.


Control Environment

Master Green Energy Limited maintains a structured control environment supported by advanced technological systems. The company leverages Oracle EBS R12 software to enhance operational efficiency and ensure robust control across various functions. Additionally, the use of SCADA systems in wind turbines allows for real-time monitoring and performance optimization. The company’s IT infrastructure is reliable and effectively supports its operations, with the scope and quality of activities consistently meeting satisfactory standards. However, the absence of an internal audit function and audit committee highlights an area for potential improvement in strengthening overall governance and risk management practices


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

Master Green Energy Limited operates under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, with a long-term Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) signed with the Central Power Purchasing Agency Guarantee Limited (CPPA-G). The agreement has a tenure of 25 years, starting from the Commercial Operations Date (COD) in August 2021. Following the Government of Pakistan's broader initiative to renegotiate and amend Power Purchase Agreements across the IPP sector, MGEL successfully executed an amendment to its PPA, which has strengthened the Company's operational framework. Accordingly, the EPA will remain in effect until August 2046, providing a stable and predictable revenue stream for the project throughout its operational life.


Operation and Maintenance

Hydro China Served as the construction contractor for the project which provided a two-year warranty period for operation and maintenance (O&M) services following the Commercial Operations Date (COD). Furthermore, a long-term O&M contract for remote monitoring and services has been established with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE), while Al-Bario Engineering (Pvt) Limited has been engaged to deliver onsite O&M services, ensuring the project’s continued reliable performance.


Resource Risk

Under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, resource risk refers to the variability in wind speed, which directly impacts the energy output of a wind power project. For Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL), this means that any fluctuation in wind speed affecting electricity generation is a risk borne by the company. As outlined in the Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA), MGEL is solely responsible for lower electricity generation resulting from reduced wind availability, making accurate forecasting and site selection critical to managing this risk effectively.


Insurance Cover

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) has obtained comprehensive insurance coverage to ensure the protection and continuity of its operations. The company has engaged Adam Jee Insurance and Alfalah Insurance to provide extensive risk coverage. The policy encompasses key areas such as business interruption, third-party liability, political violence, and property damage, thereby safeguarding MGEL against potential disruptions and unforeseen events that may affect its operations


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

The industry dynamics of Pakistan's power sector in 2024-2025 are marked by a stable outlook despite a decline in overall power generation. While total installed capacity rose 11% to 46,605 MW by 9MFY25 largely due to a 2,813 MW increase in renewable energy net metering actual generation fell by 2%, leading to a lower average capacity factor of 22.1%. This shift in capacity occurred alongside the government’s termination of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with several Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The sector remains heavily dependent on thermal power, which accounts for the largest share of both capacity and generation, followed by hydel, nuclear, and renewable sources. Financially, the industry continues to grapple with a circular debt of approximately PKR 2.4 trillion, which the government is addressing through a combination of federal budget allocations and PKR 1.25 trillion in commercial bank loans to be repaid over six years via existing surcharges. Additionally, sector borrowing decreased by 7% to PKR 471,790 million by June 2025, with coal and thermal plants remaining the most heavily leveraged entities.


Generation

Generated energy stood at 69.57 GWh in 1HFY26, compared to 52.12 GWh in 1HFY25 (1HFY24: 59.47 GWh; FY24: 103.97 GWh; FY23: 132.32 GWh). The benchmark annual generation capacity for MGEL stands at 169.00 GWh. The improved  output in the current period is primarily attributable to relatively to better wind conditions, with average wind speeds recorded at 6.62 m/s in 1HFY26, showing an improvement from 6.01 m/s in 1HFY25, though still below historical levels.


Performance Benchmark

The required availability and the capacity factor are 97% and 38.48% by NEPRA


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) has structured its project financing with a total cost of USD 65.03 million, comprising 80% debt (USD 52 million) and 20% equity (USD 13 million). The debt component includes a foreign loan of USD 25 million at a rate of 3M SOFR+CAS + 4.25% with a 13-year maturity, and a local loan of PKR 4.38 billion, financed under two tranches: one at the SBP refinancing rate of 3% + 2.25%, and the other at a commercial bank rate of 3M KIBOR + 1%, with a 10-year maturity. Both foreign and local loans are structured for repayment through quarterly installments. This financing mix reflects a balanced approach, leveraging both international and domestic funding sources while aligning repayment terms with the project's long-term cash flow generation. The Company has also demonstrated strong debt servicing capacity, having timely met 19 instalments of both foreign and local debt as of March 2026, reflecting disciplined financial management and adherence to agreed repayment schedules.


Liquidity Profile

Master Green Energy Limited (MGEL) maintains a stable liquidity profile, supported by its low operational costs, as wind IPPs do not require fuel procurement and primarily depend on internal cash flows. However, the ongoing circular debt issue in the power sector continues to impact liquidity. Receivables from CPPA-G stood at PKR 252.96 million in 1HFY26 (December 2025), improving from PKR 347.22 million in 1HFY25, PKR 579.24 million in FY25, PKR 667.70 million in FY24, and PKR 759.08 million in FY23. This reflects a quarterly decline of 56% compared to June 2025 and a year-on-year reduction of 27.15% compared to December 2024, indicating a notable improvement in recovery timelines and strengthening cash inflows.


Working Capital Financing

Trade payable days of 34 indicate that the Company settles its obligations within a month, while receivable days of 67 reflect relatively delayed cash inflows. The resulting net working capital cycle of 33 days highlights a funding gap, primarily driven by receivables. However, this represents a significant improvement from 85 days as of June 2025, indicating better recovery in receivables and enhanced working capital management during the period.


Cash Flow Analysis

Net cash generated from operations for 1HFY26 stood at ~PKR 770mln (1HFY25: PKR 553mln; FY24: PKR 1,904mln; FY23: PKR 1,968mln), reflecting an improvement in cash generation during the period, primarily driven by higher profitability and improved recovery in receivables. Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/Finance Cost) as at 1HFY26 clocked at 2.7x (1HFY25: 1.7x; FY24: 2.3x; FY23: 2.3x), indicating a strengthened buffer for debt servicing amid enhanced earnings profile.


Capitalization

MGEL’s leveraging at end December 2025 stood at 69.3% (December 2024: 71.03%; FY24: 79%; FY23: 79%), reflecting a gradual improvement in the Company’s capital structure, supported by ongoing debt repayments and growth in equity base. The declining trend indicates strengthening financial risk profile, while the Company continues to meet its principal and interest obligations in line with agreed financing terms.


 
 

Apr-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,163 11,507 11,945 12,673
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 832 830 1,021 954
a. Inventories 0 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 253 579 719 818
5. Total Assets 11,995 12,337 12,966 13,627
6. Current Liabilities 217 252 297 243
a. Trade Payables 185 234 219 121
7. Borrowings 7,927 8,436 8,921 10,188
8. Related Party Exposure 229 304 379 379
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 3,621 3,344 3,369 2,816
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,621 3,344 3,369 2,816
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,136 1,811 2,419 2,170
a. Cost of Good Sold (497) (998) (964) (771)
2. Gross Profit 639 813 1,455 1,399
a. Operating Expenses (26) (55) (64) (71)
3. Operating Profit 613 758 1,391 1,327
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 11 (39) 44 25
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 624 718 1,435 1,352
a. Total Finance Cost (342) (732) (860) (800)
b. Taxation (6) (12) (22) (7)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 277 (25) 554 545
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 863 1,249 1,904 1,968
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 531 525 1,039 1,187
c. Changes in Working Capital 239 5 76 (371)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 770 530 1,115 816
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 21 42 61 (523)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (522) (675) (844) (875)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 268 (104) 332 (582)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 25.4% -25.1% 11.5% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 56.3% 44.9% 60.1% 64.5%
c. Net Profit Margin 24.4% -1.4% 22.9% 25.1%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 97.0% 69.2% 81.8% 73.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 15.1% -0.7% 16.0% 19.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 67 131 116 138
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 33 85 90 117
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.8 3.3 3.4 3.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.7 1.8 2.3 2.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 7.4 15.6 8.7 8.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 69.3% 72.3% 73.4% 79.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 4.4 1.9 0.0 6.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.9% 7.8% 8.5% 7.3%

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

Apr-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Apr-26

www.pacra.com