Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Jun-26 BBB A2 Stable Upgrade -
12-Jun-25 BBB- A2 Positive Maintain -
12-Jun-24 BBB- A2 Positive Maintain -
12-Jun-23 BBB- A2 Positive Initial -
About the Entity

Pearl Petro Industry (Pvt.) Limited (the Company), established in 1979 and incorporated in 2014 under the Companies Act, 2017, manufactures packaging materials. The Company specializes in producing polypropylene bags, polyethylene bags (liner bags), farmhouse PT sheets, and other plastic sheets.
The Company is predominantly a family-owned enterprise. Mr. Munawar Hussain Malik, the founder and CEO, holds the majority stake (~72.7%) in the Company. His elder son, Mr. M. Ahmed Malik, owns the remaining shares (~27.8%). As Chairman and CEO, Mr. Munawar oversees all major decisions and strategic directions of the Company.

Rating Rationale

The rating upgrade reflects the strengthened financial profile of Pearl Petro Industry (Pvt.) Ltd. ("Pearl Petro" or "the Company"), supported by improved profitability, enhanced coverage indicators, and a stronger overall credit profile. The Company's equity base of Rs. 1.97 billion provides a substantial cushion against leverage-related risks and supports its financial flexibility. Pearl Petro is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of specialized polypropylene (PP) bags, polyethylene (PE) bags and sheets, farmhouse PT sheets, and various other plastic sheet products.During the period, overall capacity utilization remained at satisfactory levels across most product segments. However, utilization in the shopping bag segment declined to 38%, primarily reflecting weaker market demand, resulting in underutilized capacity within this category. Despite this segment-specific weakness, the Company maintained stable operations across its remaining product lines. To support future growth and reduce product concentration risk, the Company is pursuing diversification through the planned commissioning of a new plant for the production of geomembrane films. This strategic initiative is expected to broaden the Company's product portfolio and strengthen its market positioning. Geomembrane films are widely used as anti-seepage barriers in water conservation and infrastructure projects, helping prevent water loss, mitigate structural erosion, and enhance the integrity of earth-fill and concrete dams.
The Company's raw material procurement remains largely import-dependent, with resin sourced from Saudi Arabia, the United States, the UAE, Kuwait, Singapore, and Qatar. Consequently, Pearl Petro remains exposed to foreign exchange volatility. Nevertheless, the impact of currency fluctuations has remained manageable relative to the Company's earnings base, while continued profitability and strong capitalization provide adequate capacity to absorb such risks. Despite a decline of 22% in revenue during FY25, primarily attributable to lower sales in the shopping bag segment, the Company demonstrated resilience in its earnings profile through improved cost management and strategic inventory procurement. Consequently, profitability margins expanded, leading to higher net profitability and stronger cash flow generation. Although inventory build-up, undertaken to mitigate supply chain disruptions amid geopolitical uncertainties arising from the Iran-Israel conflict resulted in a stretched working capital cycle and increased short-term borrowing requirements, the Company's enhanced EBITDA generation supported adequate debt-servicing capacity. The resulting improvement in coverage indicators and maintenance of a strong equity base underpin the strengthening of the Company's overall credit profile. During FY25, the Company reported Profit After Tax amounting to PKR 244mln (FY24: PKR 243mln, 1HFY26: PKR 123mln).

Key Rating Drivers

The rating remains constrained by the Company's elevated working capital requirements, which continue to exert pressure on liquidity and necessitate reliance on short-term borrowings. Going forward, sustained revenue growth, continued improvement in profitability, and the maintenance of strong coverage metrics will remain critical to supporting the assigned rating.

Profile
Legal Structure

Pearl Petro Industry (Pvt.) Limited (“Pearl Petro” or the "Company”) was incorporated as a private limited company in 2014 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2017.


Background

Pearl Petro Industry (Pvt.) Limited, formerly known as MH Plastic, was established in 1979 by Munawar Hussain Malik. Initially, the Company was engaged in the sales and marketing of plastic bags. Subsequently, the Company changed its legal structure and was incorporated as a private limited company. Over the years, the Company diversified its product portfolio from polypropylene and polyethylene bags to flexible packaging solutions.


Operations

Pearl Petro Industry (Pvt.) Limited is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of polypropylene (PP) bags, polyethylene (PE) liner bags, farmhouse PT sheets, flexible packaging products, and other plastic-based solutions. The recently established flexible packaging division caters to large corporate clients by providing customized printing and packaging solutions, thereby enhancing the Company's product diversification and market reach. The Company's key raw materials, including low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polypropylene (PP), are primarily imported from Saudi Arabia, the United States, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Singapore, and Qatar. Pearl Petro operates with an installed production capacity of approximately 20,000 MT for PP bags and 36,000 MT for PE products. The Company's registered office and manufacturing facility are located near Lahore, enabling it to efficiently serve both domestic and industrial customers.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Munawar Hussain Malik holds the majority stake in the Company (~72.4%), while his son, M. Ahmed Malik, holds the remaining ~27.6% shareholding. Previously, Bushra Malik, daughter of Mr. Munawar Hussain Malik, held a ~27.6% stake in the Company.


Stability

Being a family-owned enterprise, the Company's ownership and management structure has remained stable over the years, providing continuity in strategic direction and operational oversight. The existing control framework is expected to remain intact in the foreseeable future. Although a formal and documented succession plan is not currently in place, management has indicated that, in line with the family's longstanding understanding, ownership and management control of Pearl Petro will continue to reside within the family. The absence of a formal succession framework remains a governance consideration; however, the stability of the current ownership structure provides comfort regarding continuity of control.


Business Acumen

The Sponsor possesses a strong understanding of the Company's business model, growth prospects, and underlying value proposition. Furthermore, Munawar Hussain Malik brings extensive industry experience and sector-specific expertise, enabling the Company to effectively manage operational challenges, adapt to changing market dynamics, and capitalize on emerging growth opportunities. His continued involvement provides strategic direction and strengthens the Company's overall business and risk profile.


Financial Strength

The Sponsors possess adequate financial strength and have demonstrated their ability and willingness to support the Company, if required. Their financial capacity provides an additional layer of comfort and enhances the Company's financial flexibility, thereby supporting its overall credit profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company is governed by a two-member Board comprising family representatives, both of whom serve as Executive Directors. While the existing Board structure provides continuity in strategic decision-making and operational oversight, it remains concentrated in nature. Given the Company's expanding scale of operations, the inclusion of independent directors could further enhance the governance framework by strengthening oversight, improving objectivity in decision-making, and aligning governance practices with evolving corporate requirements.


Members’ Profile

Munawar Hussain Malik, the Founder and Chairman of the Company, brings over three decades of professional experience and remains actively engaged in both day-to-day operations and key strategic decision-making processes. His continued involvement provides strategic direction and operational oversight to the organization. M. Ahmed Malik, serving as Executive Director, also plays an active role in strategic decision-making and contributes to the Company’s overall management and governance framework, supporting continuity in leadership and execution.


Board Effectiveness

The Board convenes frequently to discuss strategic and operational matters of the Company; however, the deliberations are largely informal in nature, with limited formal documentation of minutes. Furthermore, the absence of Board-level committees highlights an area for improvement in the governance framework. The establishment of structured oversight mechanisms, including formal committees, could strengthen governance practices, enhance documentation discipline, and improve overall decision-making transparency.


Financial Transparency

M/s. Amin Mudassir and Co. serve as the external auditors of the Company and have issued an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements for FY25, reflecting a clean audit outcome. The audit firm is QCR-rated by ICAP and is included in Category “B” of the State Bank of Pakistan’s panel of auditors, indicating an acceptable level of audit quality, professional competence, and regulatory standing.


Management
Organizational Structure

A well-defined organizational structure is in place, with operations appropriately segregated into distinct departments and clearly articulated lines of responsibility across all levels. Departmental heads report to the Deputy General Manager, who further reports to the Chief Executive Officer. The CEO functions as the ultimate decision-making authority, providing overall oversight of key operational and strategic matters and ensuring coordinated execution across the organization.


Management Team

The management team has demonstrated strong commitment to the Company, consistently contributing positive efforts toward its operational and strategic development. The team comprises experienced professionals with relevant industry expertise. In particular, the Finance Manager, Mr. Mushtaq, has been associated with the Company since its inception and possesses in-depth knowledge of its operations, processes, and financial framework, thereby providing continuity and strengthening the Company’s institutional capacity.


Effectiveness

The Sponsors’ extensive experience, combined with a capable professional management team, has contributed to the gradual streamlining of the Company’s operations. However, the governance structure remains relatively informal, as no formal management-level committees have been constituted, and meetings are held on an as-needed basis rather than a structured schedule. Mr. Munawar Hussain Malik retains final authority over all key decision-making processes, reflecting a centralized leadership structure.


MIS

The Company has implemented an integrated software solution, “SofTech,” which facilitates the management of key operational functions including procurement, production, sales, inventory management, and financial reporting. The system is capable of generating reports on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis, along with other detailed analytical outputs to support management decision-making. In addition, the Company maintains an on-site database infrastructure, where operational data is captured and updated on a daily basis, ensuring timely recording and monitoring of business activities.


Control Environment

The Company has obtained ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications, reflecting its commitment to maintaining internationally recognized standards of quality management and environmental management. An effective mechanism is in place for the identification, assessment, and reporting of risks arising from business operations, supporting a structured approach to risk management. Operational efficiency is overseen by the management team under the direct supervision of the Chief Executive Officer, ensuring coordinated execution and adherence to established standards and procedures.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Plastic Moulding Compound (PMC), including polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC, nylon, and PET, serves as the primary raw material for the plastic packaging industry. These petroleum-derived inputs are inherently sensitive to crude oil price movements, making international oil market dynamics and exchange rate fluctuations a persistent risk for the segment. In FY25, global oil prices softened considerably, averaging USD~70.2/bbl against USD~83.9/bbl in FY24, as OPEC+ output increases outpaced demand recovery, particularly amid subdued consumption in China. Consequently, imported polymer prices in Pakistan also witnessed some easing, with PET import prices declining to PKR~287.1/kg from PKR~295.9/kg in FY24. However, this commodity-level relief was partially offset by currency-side pressures, as Pakistan's import-reliant raw material supply chain remains exposed to exchange rate swings that can rapidly erode the benefit of lower international prices.


Relative Position

The Company has built a strong market position in the industry with its long operations, resulting in healthy relationship with suppliers, distributors, and customers.


Revenues

The Company generates revenue through the sale of a range of plastic products, including polypropylene (PP) bags, polyethylene liner bags, farmhouse PT sheets, and other plastic sheet products, serving both corporate clients and local markets. During CY25, the topline declined significantly to PKR 9.8 billion from PKR 12.6 billion in the preceding year, primarily driven by regulatory restrictions on plastic bags and a broader structural shift in consumer demand toward more sustainable and environmentally friendly packaging solutions. To support business stability and long-term sustainability, the Company is planning to diversify its product portfolio by commencing production of geomembrane films, which have significant applications in dam construction and infrastructure development as effective anti-seepage and protective lining materials.


Margins

The Company’s financial performance reflects a moderate improvement in profitability during CY25, despite a notable contraction in revenue. The Company’s profitability profile demonstrated resilience, supported by improved cost management and relatively stable input prices. Gross profit increased marginally to PKR 671 million (CY24: PKR 658 million), translating into an improved gross margin of approximately 6.8% (CY24: ~5.2%). Similarly, operating profit stood at PKR 474 million (CY24: PKR 459 million), with the operating margin strengthening to ~4.8% (CY24: ~3.6%). At the bottom line, the Company reported a profit after tax of PKR 244 million (CY24: PKR 243 million), with net profit margin improving to ~2.5% (CY24: ~1.9%). The marginal improvement in profitability metrics, despite lower sales, reflects the Company’s ability to partially offset revenue pressure through pricing adjustments, cost rationalization, and improved operational efficiency. However, profitability remains sensitive to volatility in raw material prices, distribution expenses, and financing costs, which continue to exert pressure on overall margins. Accordingly, while the earnings profile has demonstrated relative stability, sustained improvement will remain dependent on consistent revenue growth and further strengthening of cost efficiencies.


Sustainability

The management’s strategy is focused on sustaining performance through disciplined cost control initiatives, supported by ongoing operational improvements. Key efficiency enhancements include the commissioning of a five-layer printing plant and the expansion of polypropylene production capacity, aimed at improving productivity and cost efficiencies across the value chain. Furthermore, the planned introduction of a new product line, geo-membrane films, is expected to enhance product diversification, broaden the Company’s market reach, and strengthen the overall resilience of its product portfolio.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s net working capital cycle elongated to approximately 78 days in FY25 (FY24: 44 days), depicting a deterioration in overall working capital efficiency. The increase was primarily attributable to higher inventory and receivable days, partially offset by a decline in payable days. Inventory days increased to around 30 days in FY25 (FY24: ~15 days), primarily on account of inventory build-up undertaken to mitigate potential supply chain disruptions amid geopolitical uncertainties arising from the Iran–Israel conflict. This strategic decision resulted in elevated stock levels and contributed to the elongation of the working capital cycle. The Company remains largely import-dependent for raw material procurement, with resin sourced from Saudi Arabia, the United States, the UAE, Kuwait, Singapore, and Qatar. Trade receivable days increased to 54 days in FY25 (FY24: 38 days), indicating a relatively stretched collection cycle. Conversely, trade payable days declined to 6 days (FY24: ~9 days), as the Company primarily operates on sight-based LC arrangements, thereby limiting supplier credit flexibility. On a more recent basis, the net working capital cycle further extended to 106 days in 6MFY26 (6MFY24: 92 days), mainly driven by an increase in inventory days to 63 days (6MFY25: 26 days). Despite the elongation in the cycle, the Company maintains an adequate borrowing cushion, with working capital requirements largely contingent upon raw material procurement needs, which remain a strategic management decision.


Coverages

The Company’s coverage indicators exhibit a moderating but adequate profile, though marked by volatility in cash flow generation. EBITDA/Finance Cost has demonstrated a declining trend, reducing from 11.1x to 8.8x in FY25 and further to 5.1x in 6MFY26, reflecting increasing reliance on external funding and relatively higher finance cost absorption requirements; however, coverage remains adequate. Similarly, FCFO/Finance Cost has depicted fluctuation over the review period, recorded at 6.3x in FY25 and 5.1x in 6MFY26, indicating moderate internal cash generation capacity relative to finance costs. FCFO growth has remained volatile, reflecting inconsistent cash flow generation dynamics. The Debt Payback ratio has shown improvement over time, declining to 2.6x in 6MFY26 (FY25: 5.1x), supported by relatively better FCFO generation and/or moderated debt levels, indicating an improved ability to retire outstanding obligations through internal cash flows.


Capitalization

The Company’s equity base improved to approximately PKR 1.8bln in CY25 (CY24: ~PKR 1.7bln), primarily driven by an increase in retained earnings, reflecting continued profit accumulation.During FY25, the Company successfully eliminated its short-term borrowings. However, in 1HFY26, the Company availed short-term financing to manage its working capital requirements amid the Iran–Israel conflict. As a result, total leverage stood at 14.1% as of end-Jun’25, compared with 59.0% at end-Jun’24.


 
 

Jun-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,464 1,556 1,681 1,867
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 30
4. Current Assets 5,197 3,007 2,745 3,406
a. Inventories 2,855 1,041 549 458
b. Trade Receivables 1,311 1,359 1,522 1,103
5. Total Assets 6,661 4,564 4,426 5,302
6. Current Liabilities 1,181 1,596 459 1,810
a. Trade Payables 144 109 148 458
7. Borrowings 411 293 2,189 1,764
8. Related Party Exposure 3,067 793 120 136
9. Non-Current Liabilities 31 34 56 234
10. Net Assets 1,971 1,847 1,602 1,357
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,971 1,847 1,602 1,357
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,665 9,801 12,612 11,333
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,260) (9,130) (11,954) (10,400)
2. Gross Profit 405 671 658 933
a. Operating Expenses (193) (197) (199) (129)
3. Operating Profit 212 474 459 805
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 84 68 153 (162)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 297 542 612 642
a. Total Finance Cost (29) (65) (93) (132)
b. Taxation (145) (232) (276) (205)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 123 244 243 305
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 268 301 537 732
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 268 274 490 629
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 (241) (1,077) 1,040
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 268 33 (586) 1,669
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 130 13 83
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (269) (164) (38)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 268 (106) (738) 1,714
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 15.6% -22.3% 11.3% 30.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 7.2% 6.8% 5.2% 8.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.2% 2.5% 1.9% 2.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 4.7% 0.6% -4.3% 15.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.9% 14.2% 16.4% 25.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 106 83 53 55
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 102 78 44 35
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.4 1.9 6.0 1.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 11.0 9.9 8.8 5.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 4.6 1.6 0.3 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.3 1.2 5.1 3.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 17.2% 14.1% 59.0% 58.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 52.5 82.5 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 3.7% 2.9% 4.3% 6.5%

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-26

www.pacra.com