Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
22-May-26 BB A3 Stable Maintain -
30-May-25 BB A3 Stable Maintain -
14-Jun-24 BB A3 Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-23 BB A3 Stable Maintain -
24-Jun-22 BB A3 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Meezan Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Limited is a Private Limited Company incorporated in Pakistan in June 2018 under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017 as adapted under the Azad Jammu & Kashmir Companies Adaptation Act, 2021). It is family owned and operated business with shareholding divided among 2 members, Mr. Hafiz Muhammad Atif (~70%), and Mr. Yasir Amin (~30%). Mr. Hafiz Muhammad Atif is the founding member and CEO of the Company since its incorporation.

Rating Rationale

Meezan Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Limited (“MPI” or “the Company”), is a growing manufacturer and distributor of BOPP/OPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene) packaging materials, continues to strengthen its role in Pakistan’s packaging industry by serving both edible and non-edible product markets. With sales outlets strategically located in Faisalabad and Lahore, MPI facilitates efficient distribution and maintains direct operational oversight, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. The sponsors bring significant industry expertise, which supports informed decision-making and contributes to sustainable business growth. Pakistan’s BOPP/OPP packaging film industry remains fragmented, with a large unorganized segment and a few dominant players that have invested in advanced technologies. Amid an increasingly competitive landscape, MPI is establishing itself as an emerging player in the packaging sector. By leveraging its expertise in BOPP/OPP bag manufacturing, the Company is focusing on serving the price-sensitive segment of the packaging industry. However, it faces challenges from volatile polypropylene resin prices tied to global oil markets, exchange rate fluctuations, and competition from larger, more technologically advanced rivals. BOPP/OPP films are widely used across food packaging, non-food packaging, and various industrial applications. The key drivers of this market include the steady growth in food and beverage packaging, rising demand for films with UV light barrier properties, and broader macro trends such as population growth, urbanization, increasing consumer awareness of product safety and quality, and the rapid expansion of e-commerce. MPI is a family owned enterprise with strong leadership and a collaborative structure that drives efficiency and innovation, though succession planning remains a key need for long term stability. The Company’s governance framework remains fragile due to the absence of a formal board, dedicated committees, and independent oversight. Moreover, its external auditors are neither QCR rated nor included on the SBP panel, underscoring the need to strengthen financial transparency and regulatory compliance. During FY25, the Company’s revenue declined to PKR 2.2 billion, compared with PKR 4.0 billion in FY24. The reduction was primarily attributed to the flood situation affecting the facility’s surrounding area, which disrupted operations and impacted overall business performance. In FY25, the Company’s gross margin showed a modest improvement, rising to ~9.3% from ~8.9% in FY24. However, the net profit margin declined from around ~2.9% to ~0.9%. This reduction was primarily driven by the inclusion of taxation expenses in FY25, following the expiry of the exemption under Section 65D of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which lapsed on 15 March 2024. The Company’s financial risk profile is satisfactory, supported by moderate coverage, cash flows, and a manageable working capital cycle, though trade receivable days have continued to lengthen. Operations rely solely on internally generated cash flows, with no plans for short or long term borrowing. A non funded facility has been secured from a financial institution to support the import of essential raw materials

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on Company’s ability to maintain its position in a changing business environment and on management’s effective oversight of operations. Sustained growth in business volumes, increased sales supporting the bottom line, adherence to financial discipline, and a strong control framework will remain critical.

Profile
Legal Structure

Meezan Plastic Industries Private Ltd (hereinafter referred to as "MPI" or "the Company") was established as a Private Limited Company in June 2018.


Background

Meezan Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Limited was incorporated in Azad Jammu & Kashmir under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017 as adapted under the Azad Jammu & Kashmir Companies Adaptation Act, 2021) as (Private) Limited Company in June 2018. The registered office of the Company is situated at Small Industrial Estate, Bhimber, Azad Kashmir.


Operations

Meezan Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Limited serves the packaging market with a focus on manufacturing a wide range of plastic products and packing materials. The Company specializes in the production of BOPP and OPP plastic bags, primarily catering to the textile and jewellery sectors. The Company has its own sales outlets in Lahore and Faisalabad. MPI operates two manufacturing units. The first is a production facility with an annual capacity of 14.4 million kilograms of bags, while the second is a dedicated printing unit equipped with a Flexo machine, offering an annual production capacity of 35 tons. Together, these facilities enable the Company to deliver high‑quality packaging solutions tailored to diverse market needs.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

MPI is a family-owned enterprise, with majority ownership held by Mr. Hafiz Muhammad Atif, who controls ~70% of the Company. The remaining ~30% is owned by his brother, Mr. Yasir Amin. Their shared leadership structure ensures direct oversight of operations and provides strategic direction for the business.


Stability

Currently, the Company does not have a formal succession plan in place for the future transfer of ownership shares. The absence of a defined strategy may create challenges in ensuring a smooth transition of control and could potentially affect long‑term business stability. Establishing a clear succession plan would strengthen governance practices, safeguard financial and operational interests, and provide assurance of continuity for employees, customers, and investors. A well‑designed framework would also help mitigate risks associated with ownership disputes, ensure alignment of strategic vision, and reinforce the Company’s long‑term sustainability.


Business Acumen

MPI is a family-owned business managed by two seasoned professionals with extensive expertise in the packaging sector. Their deep industry knowledge and hands-on leadership enable effective decision-making, operational efficiency, and strategic growth. By combining entrepreneurial vision with practical experience, they ensure that the Company remains agile, competitive, and responsive to evolving market demands. This shared leadership not only strengthens governance but also fosters innovation and long-term sustainability. Their commitment to excellence continues to drive the Company’s success, positioning MPI as a trusted name in Pakistan’s packaging industry.


Financial Strength

The sponsoring family maintains diverse investments across real estate and allied businesses, which serve as a potential source of financial support for the Company. These external holdings provide an additional layer of security, acting as a financial cushion in the event of liquidity challenges or unforeseen operational requirements. This diversified investment portfolio not only strengthens the family’s overall financial position but also enhances the Company’s resilience by ensuring access to supplementary resources when needed. Such backing reinforces business stability, safeguards operational continuity, and instills confidence among stakeholders in the Company’s long‑term sustainability.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s overall control rests with its two‑member Board of Directors (BoD), both of whom serve in executive roles. This structure ensures that strategic decisions and operational oversight remain directly in the hands of the sponsoring family, allowing for swift decision‑making and strong alignment between ownership and management.


Members’ Profile

The leadership of Meezan Plastic Industries (Pvt.) Limited is anchored by two key executives from the sponsoring family. Mr. Hafiz Muhammad Atif, serving as Chief Executive Officer (CEO), oversees the overall management of the business, ensuring strategic direction and operational efficiency. His leadership is complemented by strong business relationships cultivated with buyers and suppliers, which have significantly contributed to the Company’s growth and strengthened its market presence. Alongside him, Mr. Yasir Amin, serving as Director, plays a pivotal role in managing the Company’s affairs. He ensures smooth day‑to‑day operations and effective execution of strategic initiatives. His active involvement in key decision‑making processes further enhances the Company’s ability to navigate industry challenges, maintain resilience, and sustain long‑term success. Together, their combined expertise and collaborative leadership provide stability, reinforce governance, and position Meezan Plastic Industries as a trusted and competitive player in Pakistan’s packaging sector.


Board Effectiveness

The Company’s Board currently consists of only two members, both of whom hold executive roles. While this structure allows for agility and direct oversight, it also makes the governance framework weaker compared to established corporates with broader representation. The absence of formal board committees further limits oversight, risk management, and strategic decision‑making capacity. To strengthen governance, the Company could consider expanding its Board to include independent directors, thereby introducing diverse perspectives and enhancing accountability. In addition, establishing key committees—such as Audit, Risk Management, and Strategy—would provide structured oversight, improve transparency, and support long‑term sustainability. These measures would align the Company’s governance practices with recognized corporate standards, instilling greater confidence among stakeholders and reinforcing its resilience in a competitive market.


Financial Transparency

The absence of an internal audit function further creates room for improvement in the corporate governanceframework. M/S Zafar & Co. Chartered Accountants are the external auditor of the Company. The auditors haveexpressed an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements of Meezan Plastic Industries Pvt. Limited forthe year ended June 30, 2025. The firm is not on SBP's panel of auditors and is Non-QCR rated, therefore there isroom for improvement in the corporate governance framework.


Management
Organizational Structure

MPI has a lean organizational structure divided into various functional departments. Currently, the organizational structure is divided into five main functions namely; 1) Sales &Marketing 2) Production 3) Purchase 4) Accounts & Finance, and 5) Collection & Recovery.


Management Team

The Company has an organizational structure with an experienced management team and a balanced mix of professionals. Mr. Hafiz Muhammad Hamid, General Manager, holds a Ph.D. degree and has been associated with the Company for the past 5 years. Mr. Sheikh Muhammad Bilal, Production, Planning & Control Manager, has been associated with the Company for the past 5 years. Mr. Muhammad Nasir, Marketing Manager has been associated with the Company for the past 5 years. Mr. Muhammad Azam Chief Accountant holds adegree in MBA Finance and has been associated with the Company for the past 5 years.


Effectiveness

The Company's management team comprises experienced professionals with extensive expertise in the plastic industry. Their collective knowledge and industry background enable effective decision-making and operational management. Although there is no formal management committee, the Board of Directors are actively engaged in the Company's day-to-day operations, ensuring strategic oversight and direct involvement in key business activities. Instead of a designated committee, departmental heads conduct meetings to address operational matters, with the frequency of these meetings varying based on the evolving business needs and industry dynamics. This flexible management structure allows for efficient communication, rapid decision-making, and adaptability to market conditions, ensuring that operational challenges are promptly addressed while maintaining alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives.


MIS

The Company's Management Information System (MIS) plays a crucial role in financial oversight and strategic decision-making. It generates key financial statements—including the Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Statement,and Cash Flow Statement on an annualize basis. These reports provide a comprehensive snapshot of the Company’s financial health, enabling informed decision-making at the highest level. Additionally,the MIS generates detailed sales reports, which are reviewed by top management daily.


Control Environment

The Company utilizes licensed Microsoft Office applications, including Excel, Word, and Outlook, to support its daily operations and ensure efficient workflow management. These tools play a critical role in data processing,documentation, and communication across various departments. For internal Management Information System(MIS) reporting, the Company maintains a structured reporting framework, generating reports on a weekly,monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. These reports provide senior management with valuable insights into key operational and financial metrics, aiding in strategic decision-making and performance evaluation.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The future of Pakistan’s BOPP and OPP films industry is expected to reflect moderate yet steady growth, supported by strong demand fundamentals and increasing domestic production capacity. Imports have already contracted at a CAGR of around -15% between 2020 and 2024, underscoring the structural shift toward local manufacturing as producers invest in advanced technologies such as multi‑layer and metallized films. Over the next five to seven years, the industry is projected to deliver a mid‑single‑digit CAGR, driven by rising consumption of packaged food and beverages, expanding pharmaceutical requirements, and growth in e‑commerce, all aligned with urbanization and evolving consumer preferences. However, the outlook remains tempered by volatility in polypropylene resin prices linked to global oil markets, exchange rate instability, and competitive pressures from regional producers in India, China, and the Middle East. Regulatory changes, including updated customs valuations, have further reshaped industry dynamics by aligning import costs with global benchmarks and incentivizing local production. The sector’s trajectory is stable to moderately positive, with sustainability hinging on governance improvements, cost efficiency, and technological upgrades among domestic players, while risks from external shocks and industry fragmentation necessitate close monitoring.


Relative Position

Meezan Plastic Industries Limited (MPI) operates within Pakistan’s highly fragmented BOPP/OPP packaging film industry, which is gradually shifting from import reliance toward stronger domestic production amid regulatory changes and rising demand from food, beverage, pharmaceutical, and industrial sectors. The industry remains divided between a large unorganized segment and a few dominant players such as Cherat Packaging Limited, Pakistan Synthetics Limited, and Nishat Paper Products Company Limited, alongside organized firms like IPAK Group that have invested in advanced technologies including five-layer and metallized films. Within this competitive landscape, MPI is positioning itself as an emerging player by leveraging its expertise in manufacturing high-quality BOPP/OPP bags and focusing on operational efficiency to expand its market share. The Company benefits from its regional footprint in Faisalabad and Lahore, serving both edible and non-edible packaging segments, though it faces challenges from volatile polypropylene resin prices linked to global oil markets, exchange rate fluctuations, and competitive pressures from larger, more technologically advanced rivals. MPI’s growth strategy is expected to include enhancing production capabilities, fostering strategic partnerships, and adapting to evolving industry trends to remain competitive. The Company demonstrates moderate growth potential supported by sectoral demand drivers, but its risk profile is elevated by external shocks, governance limitations, and industry fragmentation, requiring close monitoring of cost structures, strategic adaptability, and governance practices.


Revenues

MPI derives the majority of its income from the sale of BOPP/OPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene) bags, which are widely utilized in packaging applications due to their durability and flexibility. During FY25, the Company’s revenues contracted sharply by 44.5%, declining to PKR 2.2 billion from PKR 4.0 billion in FY24. According to management, this downturn reflects a broad reduction in demand for BOPP/OPP bags within Pakistan, driven by weaker activity in key end‑use industries such as textiles, FMCG, and agriculture. In addition to demand pressures, rising raw material costs—linked to imported polypropylene—have eroded competitiveness, while exchange rate volatility has further inflated input prices along with the flood situation at facilitys' surrounding are afftected the operations of the MPI. The shift in consumer and corporate preferences toward eco‑friendly packaging alternatives has also intensified competition, contributing to the decline in sales volumes. Moreover, taxation pressures have compressed margins, discouraging buyers and limiting the Company’s ability to pass on cost increases. The significant revenue contraction underscores structural challenges in MPI’s operating environment, highlighting the need for diversification, cost optimization, and strategic adaptation to evolving market dynamics. Management’s ability to mitigate these pressures will be critical in stabilizing earnings and preserving financial resilience going forward.


Margins

MPI recorded a modest increase in gross profits during FY25, primarily supported by lower operating costs. Consequently, the gross profit margin improved to ~9.3%, compared to ~8.9% in FY24. However, the Company’s net profit margin contracted significantly, declining from ~2.9% in FY24 to ~0.9% in FY25. This deterioration was largely driven by a sharp reduction in revenues of ~44% during the review period, coupled with higher taxation expenses. In response to these financial pressures, the Company remains committed to implementing stringent cost-control measures, particularly in administrative expenses. By enhancing operational efficiency and maintaining disciplined expenditure management, MPI aims to safeguard its bottom-line margins despite ongoing challenges in revenue generation and rising costs. Furthermore, management is expected to pursue strategic initiatives such as improving supply chain efficiency, renegotiating supplier contracts, and identifying cost-saving opportunities across production and logistics. These measures are intended to mitigate financial volatility and reinforce the Company’s ability to sustain profitability in a challenging operating environment.


Sustainability

MPI has developed reliable forecasts that are consistent with its strategic vision, supporting the sustainability of its planned growth trajectory. Management anticipates continued demand for plastic bags used in packaging materials—particularly for apparel and household textiles such as shirts, cloth, and bedsheets—driven by several structural market factors. These include expansion in the retail sector, rising requirements for protective packaging, and consumer preferences for convenient and durable storage solutions. Additionally, the evolving dynamics of e-commerce and the textile industry are expected to further stimulate demand, as businesses increasingly seek efficient packaging options that enhance product presentation and ensure safe transportation. Leveraging its established expertise, MPI is well-positioned to capitalize on these trends, reinforcing its role within the packaging industry and strengthening its long-term market relevance.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company continues to rely on internal cash flows to finance its working capital requirements, which are predominantly driven by inventory and receivables. By the close of FY25, gross working capital days extended to ~108 days, compared to ~60 days in FY24. Similarly, net working capital days increased to around ~93 days in FY25, up from ~52 days in FY24. The elongation in working capital cycle highlights a shift in the Company’s cash conversion dynamics and reflects a more stretched liquidity position. This trend underscores the need for enhanced efficiency in receivables management and inventory turnover to safeguard cash flow stability.


Coverages

During the review period, MPI’s operating cashflows (FCFO) recorded a substantial decline, falling from PKR 119mln in FY24 to PKR 21mln in FY25. This contraction was largely attributable to reduced revenues and profitability in FY25, underscoring the financial pressures confronting the Company. The weakened cash generation capacity reflects heightened operational challenges and signals a deterioration in MPI’s overall financial flexibility.


Capitalization

The Company’s equity base demonstrated steady growth, rising PKR 521mln in FY24 to around PKR 541mln in FY25. This expansion is primarily attributable to profit retention from prior years, which has reinforced the Company’s capital structure and overall financial resilience. Notably, the Company does not maintain any long-term or short-term funded facilities, thereby limiting its reliance on external borrowings. However, access to a non-funded facility of PKR 500mln (at group level) provides an additional buffer, enhancing liquidity support and financial flexibility.


 
 

May-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3 4 4
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 758 698 780
a. Inventories 12 88 96
b. Trade Receivables 673 570 600
5. Total Assets 761 702 784
6. Current Liabilities 220 181 382
a. Trade Payables 94 99 99
7. Borrowings 0 0 0
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 541 521 402
11. Shareholders' Equity 541 521 402
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,272 4,091 4,105
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,060) (3,728) (3,711)
2. Gross Profit 211 363 394
a. Operating Expenses (160) (240) (242)
3. Operating Profit 51 123 153
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 0 0 0
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 51 123 153
a. Total Finance Cost 0 0 0
b. Taxation (31) (4) 0
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 20 118 153
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 21 119 153
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 21 119 153
c. Changes in Working Capital (19) (179) (100)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1 (60) 54
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 0 0
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 0 0
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 1 (60) 54
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -44.5% -0.3% 41.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 9.3% 8.9% 9.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.9% 2.9% 3.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.1% -1.5% 1.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.8% 25.7% 46.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 108 60 56
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 93 52 51
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.4 3.9 2.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost N/A N/A N/A
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB N/A N/A N/A
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) N/A N/A N/A
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

May-26

www.pacra.com

May-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

May-26

www.pacra.com