Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
25-Sep-25 BB A4 Stable Maintain YES
25-Sep-24 BB A4 Stable Downgrade -
26-Sep-23 BBB- A3 Stable Downgrade -
30-Sep-22 BBB A3 Stable Maintain YES
30-Sep-21 BBB A3 Stable Maintain YES
About the Entity

Thardeep Microfinance Foundation was incorporated with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) in 2016 as a Public Company Limited by Guarantee under Section 42 of the Companies. The overall control of the Foundation vests with a seven-member BOD. Dr. Naseer Muhammad Nizamani is the Chairman of the Board, while Mr. Sono Khangharani is the CEO.

Rating Rationale

Thardeep Microfinance Foundation (TMF or “the Foundation”) is positioned as a small-tier institution within Pakistan’s microfinance sector. The sector operates under the regulatory framework of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), which governs Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) through the Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFC) Rules, 2003, and the NBFC Notified Entities Regulations, 2008. Within this regulated environment, the Foundation plays a significant role in extending financial inclusion to underserved communities. Its core activity is to mobilize funds for the provision of microfinance services to impoverished individuals, with a dedicated emphasis on women, who remain central to its mission of economic upliftment. Through this focus, the Foundation strives to mitigate poverty, promote social welfare, and uphold economic justice. Beyond financial services, it actively engages in community development and social mobilization, thereby seeking to build resilience at the grassroots level and contribute to long-term poverty alleviation. The microfinance sector, comprising Microfinance Banks (MFBs), Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), and Rural Support Programs (RSPs), reported a Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of ~PKR 597.6bln in CY24 (CY23: ~PKR 546.1bln), with MFIs and RSPs accounting for ~23% of the total. Over time, the MFIs and RSPs segment has demonstrated stability in terms of active borrowers, although average loan sizes have continued to expand. Asset quality in the MFI segment improved, with NPLs declining to ~1.57% in CY24 (CY23: ~2.80%). The governance structure of TMF consists of sponsoring members serving as the board of directors. As a nonprofit organization, the Foundation’s funding primarily comes from three sources: a) internal profit generation, b) borrowings, and c) grants. Currently, the Foundation relies entirely on domestic borrowings. To enhance control, the organization is implementing technological advancements to automate and integrate processes for real-time monitoring of recoveries and disbursements. The assigned ratings of the Foundation reflect a decline in asset quality, insufficient liquidity, and a high infection ratio. The Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) has decreased by ~33% in FY25 and stood at PKR 1.8bln (FY24: PKR 2.6bln, FY23: PKR 3.5bln). However, as per the management representation, fresh disbursement has been started, and recoveries have been improved. Portfolio disbursements are concentrated in interior Sindh, where previously the risk of non-performing loans had escalated due to geographic challenges, climate change-related flooding. During FY25, the Foundation reported a gross income of ~PKR ~115mln, as compared to a gross loss of PKR ~20.5mln in FY24. This improvement was attributed to a reduction in funding costs. Consequently, the Foundation reported a humble profit before tax of PKR ~7.4mln in FY25, as compared to a loss of PKR ~256mln in FY24. The Portfolio at Risk (PAR) further deteriorated to 10.3% (FY24: ~5.8%), significantly above the industry average, further deteriorating the Foundation's credit risk profile. A definitive strategy is needed to address these multiple challenges, and continued support from the sponsors will remain crucial.

Key Rating Drivers

Ratings are dependent on the foundations' ability to provide comfort on asset quality through efficient management of PAR, alongside improvement in liquidity and growth in the loan portfolio. The augmentation of the profitability matrix to strengthen the equity base remains critical.

Profile
Structure

Thardeep Microfinance Foundation (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Foundation', 'the Company' or 'TMF') is a not-for-profit organization, registered under section 42 of the Companies Act,. as a Microfinance provider, by Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).


Background

TMF has its origins since 1998 as a community loans provider through a donor-funded relief project which then became a Rural Support Programme (RSP). These loans were given out by the Thardeep Rural Development Programme (TRDP) initially in Tharparkar, which extended to other districts of Sindh. In 2003, Thardeep Rural Development Programme (TRDP) demerged its Micro Credit and Enterprise Development Unit and incorporated a separate entity namely Thardeep Microfinance Foundation (The Company) on October 06, 2016 under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now Companies Act, 2017).


Operations

TMF operates at a district level with a network of over ~66 branches. The principal activity of the Company is to mobilize funds for provision of microfinance services to poor persons, particularly, poor women for mitigating poverty and promoting social welfare and economic justice through community building and social mobilization with the ultimate objective of poverty alleviation.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

TMF was established by a group of seven founding members. Among these individuals, several were nominated by the Thardeep Rural Development Programme (TRDP), an organization recognized for its contributions to rural development and poverty alleviation in rural Sindh. Individuals from TRDP do not possess any shareholding in TMF. Their involvement in the foundation's formation was based on their professional expertise and alignment with the organization’s development-oriented objectives. Their role was primarily consultative and strategic, intended to support the establishment of a governance framework that reflects TMF’s commitment to inclusive financial services. This founding structure was deliberately designed to ensure that TMF operates as a non-profit entity, with no financial interests held by its founding members. The absence of shareholding among the founders reinforces the foundation’s focus on transparency, accountability, and its mission to serve underserved communities through responsible microfinance practices.



Stability

In not-for-profit organizations, the underlying ideology is centered on community welfare and public service rather than financial gain. As a result, the involvement of individuals—whether as board members, advisors, or volunteers—is typically driven by a sense of social responsibility and commitment to the organization’s mission. Their association is often voluntary, reflecting a shared dedication to advancing the organization’s objectives without expectation of personal benefit or ownership. Given this voluntary and mission-driven nature, formal succession planning is generally not a primary focus within such foundations. Unlike corporate entities where leadership transitions are strategically planned to ensure continuity of business operations and shareholder value, not-for-profit organizations often rely on the goodwill and availability of committed individuals to fill leadership roles as needed. Leadership changes may occur organically, based on consensus, availability, or the evolving needs of the organization. However, while succession planning may be less emphasized, it is not entirely absent. Some not-for-profit institutions do recognize the importance of leadership continuity and institutional memory, especially as they grow in scale and complexity. In such cases, informal mechanisms or governance policies may be introduced to ensure smooth transitions and sustained organizational effectiveness. Due to the voluntary nature of member involvement and the focus on community welfare, succession planning in not-for-profit foundations is typically minimal and flexible, shaped more by values and commitment than by formalized structures.


Business Acumen

The member profile of TMF comprises experienced professionals who bring a diverse and multifaceted skill set to the organization. These individuals possess expertise across various domains, including financial management, community development, governance, strategic planning, and social entrepreneurship. Their collective knowledge and practical experience enable them to provide effective guidance and oversight, ensuring that TMF remains aligned with its mission and operational goals. Each member contributes a unique perspective shaped by years of professional engagement in both public and private sector initiatives. This diversity not only enhances the decision-making process but also strengthens the foundation’s ability to respond to complex challenges and evolving community needs. Their leadership plays a critical role in shaping policies, designing inclusive financial products, and fostering sustainable development practices. By leveraging the strengths of its members, TMF is well-positioned to achieve its objectives of promoting financial inclusion, empowering underserved populations, and supporting long-term socio-economic progress in the regions it serves.



Financial Strength

As TMF is a registered not-for-profit organization, its operational and financial model is fundamentally different from that of commercial or shareholder-driven entities. The primary focus of the foundation is on community welfare, financial inclusion, and social impact, rather than generating profits or distributing returns to stakeholders. Member involvement in such organizations is typically based on voluntary service, strategic guidance, and governance oversight. Members are generally appointed for their expertise, commitment to the foundation’s mission, and ability to contribute to its long-term development goals. Moreover, not-for-profit organizations like TMF often rely on external sources of funding—such as grants, donor support, institutional partnerships, and government programs—to sustain their operations and expand their outreach. This funding model ensures that the organization remains independent of individual financial interests and maintains its focus on serving marginalized and underserved communities.


Governance
Board Structure

The governance of TMF is vested in a Board comprising seven members. This Board includes three female directors and four male directors, reflecting a degree of gender diversity in its composition. The Board holds overall authority and is responsible for setting the strategic direction, approving key policies, and ensuring that the foundation operates in alignment with its mission and regulatory obligations. None of the Board members are part of TMF’s executive or top-tier management. This separation of governance and management functions is intentional and aligns with best practices in organizational oversight. By maintaining a clear distinction between the Board and operational leadership, TMF ensures that decision-making remains objective, transparent, and free from potential conflicts of interest. The Board’s role is primarily supervisory and strategic, while day-to-day operations are managed by a professional executive team. This structure supports effective checks and balances, promotes accountability, and reinforces the foundation’s commitment to ethical governance.


Members’ Profile

The Board of TMF comprises a group of highly experienced and well-diversified professionals, each bringing a unique blend of expertise and insight to the organization. Collectively, the board members possess extensive backgrounds in fields such as public health, social development, finance, governance, and community-based initiatives. Their prior involvement in grassroots and institutional development efforts reflects a deep commitment to social welfare and inclusive growth. At the helm of the Board is the Chairman, Dr. Naseer Muhammad Nizamani, a distinguished physician with over two decades of professional experience. Dr. Nizamani has served in various leadership and advisory capacities within internationally recognized organizations, including the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). His career has been marked by a strong focus on public health, humanitarian assistance, and capacity building in underserved regions. Under his leadership, the Board continues to guide TMF with strategic foresight and a strong emphasis on ethical governance, institutional integrity, and community empowerment. The collective experience of the board members plays a pivotal role in shaping the foundation’s policies, ensuring operational effectiveness, and advancing its mission to provide equitable financial services to marginalized populations.



Board Effectiveness

TMF has established three specialized sub-committees to support its governance and operational oversight. These include the Audit Committee, the Information Technology (IT) Committee, and the Human Resource Committee. Each committee is tasked with specific responsibilities aligned with its area of focus, contributing to the overall effectiveness and accountability of the organization. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing financial reports, monitoring internal controls, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. The IT Committee oversees the development and implementation of technological systems, focusing on digital infrastructure, data security, and innovation. The Human Resource Committee manages personnel-related matters, including recruitment, staff development, and policy formulation. During the reporting period, attendance at committee meetings was consistently strong, indicating active participation and commitment from members. Furthermore, all meetings were properly documented, with minutes recorded in accordance with organizational protocols. These records serve as an essential reference for decision- making and demonstrate TMF’s adherence to transparent governance practices.


Transparency

BDO Ebrahim & Co are the External Auditors of TMF. The auditors are on the QCR list as well as categorized - 'A' on the list of SBP approved auditors. Audit of FY25 is in process.


Management
Organizational Structure

TMF operates under a decentralized organizational structure, which allows for the distribution of decision-making authority across various levels of the institution. This model is designed to promote operational efficiency, responsiveness, and empowerment within different functional areas of the organization. Under this structure, individual sections and divisions are granted varying degrees of autonomy, enabling them to make decisions relevant to their specific roles and responsibilities. This approach fosters a sense of ownership among departmental teams and encourages proactive problem-solving, innovation, and adaptability in day-to-day operations. Decentralization also supports TMF’s outreach efforts, particularly in geographically dispersed and rural areas, by allowing regional offices and field units to respond more effectively to local needs and challenges. While strategic oversight and policy direction remain centralized at the board and senior management level, operational decisions are often made closer to the point of service delivery. Overall, TMF’s decentralized framework enhances organizational agility, strengthens accountability at multiple levels, and aligns with its mission to provide inclusive and community-focused financial services.




Management Team

TMF is led by a management team that brings together a diverse range of professional experience and specialized skills. This blend of expertise enables the organization to operate effectively across various domains, including financial services, community development, institutional governance, and strategic planning. At the helm of the organization is Mr. Sono Khangharani, the Chief Executive Officer and one of TMF’s founding members. Mr. Khangharani has a distinguished career spanning more than three decades, marked by his deep commitment to social development and rural empowerment. His professional journey began in late 1982 as a lecturer at the Agriculture University in Tando Jam, Sindh, where he laid the foundation for his lifelong dedication to education and community service. Since the inception of TMF, Mr. Khangharani and the entire management team have remained actively engaged in guiding the organization’s growth and mission. Their long-standing association with the foundation reflects a shared vision and continuity in  leadership, which has been instrumental in shaping TMF’s strategic direction and operational success. The collective experience of the management team not only enhances institutional capacity but also reinforces TMF’s commitment to delivering inclusive and sustainable financial solutions to underserved communities across Pakistan.


Effectiveness

TMF follows a structured and systematic decision-making process that supports operational efficiency and organizational accountability. Each department within the foundation is led by a designated head who is responsible for overseeing the day-to-day activities, ensuring that departmental functions are executed smoothly and in alignment with TMF’s strategic objectives. Department heads play a critical role in maintaining internal coordination and performance standards. They are entrusted with monitoring progress, addressing operational challenges, and implementing policies within their respective areas of responsibility. To ensure cohesive governance and informed decision-making, department heads regularly engage with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to discuss material matters, including strategic initiatives, resource allocation, and emerging issues that may impact the foundation’s mission. These interactions between departmental leadership and the CEO foster a collaborative environment, enabling timely decisions and reinforcing TMF’s commitment to transparency, responsiveness, and mission-driven management.


MIS

TMF maintains an integrated departmental structure that facilitates effective decision-making across the organization. The close coordination among departments ensures that information flows seamlessly, enabling timely and informed decisions that support operational efficiency and strategic alignment. As part of its forward-looking approach, TMF is currently in the process of implementing a comprehensive Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. This initiative is aimed at enhancing organizational performance by streamlining processes, improving data management, and strengthening internal controls. The ERP system will serve as a centralized platform for managing core functions such as finance, human resources, operations, and reporting. To support this transformation, TMF has entered into a collaboration with Aritech, a technology solutions provider with expertise in ERP implementation. The partnership is focused on designing and deploying a system tailored to TMF’s operational needs, with the goal of improving transparency, accountability, and scalability across all levels of the organization. This strategic investment reflects TMF’s commitment to institutional development and its ongoing efforts to adopt modern tools that enhance service delivery and organizational governance.


Risk Management framework

TMF has established a dedicated Risk & Compliance Department to proactively identify, assess, and manage risk-related factors across the organization. This department plays a critical role in ensuring that TMF’s operations remain aligned with regulatory standards, internal policies, and best practices in risk mitigation. In addition to its risk management responsibilities, the Compliance function within the department conducts regular inspections of all relevant operational units. These inspections are carried out on a monthly and quarterly basis, depending on the nature and scope of the department being reviewed. The purpose of these inspections is to monitor adherence to established procedures, detect potential non-compliance, and recommend corrective actions where necessary. TMF also maintains an independent Internal Audit Department, which functions separately from day-to-day operations and reports directly to the Audit Committee of the Board. This reporting structure ensures objectivity and enhances the effectiveness of internal controls. The Internal Audit Department is responsible for evaluating financial integrity, operational efficiency, and compliance with organizational policies, thereby contributing to TMF’s overall governance and accountability framework. Together, these departments form a robust oversight mechanism that supports TMF’s commitment to transparency, risk resilience, and continuous improvement.


Technology Infrastructure

TMF has developed a strong and forward-looking technological infrastructure that significantly enhances its operational efficiency and strategic positioning within the microfinance sector. This advanced digital framework provides TMF with a competitive advantage, enabling the organization to deliver services with greater speed, accuracy, and transparency. The foundation has successfully implemented sophisticated automated processes across all departments, fostering a fully paperless environment. This transition to digital operations has not only streamlined workflows but also minimized manual errors, improved data accessibility, and strengthened internal controls. A key component of TMF’s technology ecosystem is the Electronic Financial Information System (e-FIS). This system plays a central role in managing financial transactions, allowing for the efficient generation, tracking, and reporting of monetary activities. e-FIS supports real-time processing and ensures that financial data is securely handled and accurately recorded, contributing to improved financial governance and accountability. To further enhance its digital capabilities, TMF has partnered with Microsoft Azure, a globally recognized cloud service provider. Through this collaboration, the foundation has acquired cloud hosting services that offer scalability, high-level data security, and uninterrupted access to mission-critical applications. The adoption of cloud technology enables TMF to support remote operations, maintain system reliability, and prepare for future growth without the limitations of traditional infrastructure. TMF’s investment in modern technology reflects its commitment to innovation, operational excellence, and the delivery of high-quality financial services to underserved communities.




Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s economy has previously contended with significant macroeconomic headwinds; however, signs of stabilization have emerged in the IHFY25. This period has been characterized by a gradual reduction in policy rates and a notable decline in inflation, creating a more favorable environment for economic activity. These positive developments are expected to offer crucial support to several sectors, including microfinance. As of the latest data, the total Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of the microfinance sector stands at approximately ~PKR 598bln, comprising contributions from Microfinance Banks (MFBs), Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), and Rural Support Programs (RSPs). MFIs and RSPs collectively account for around ~23% of the total GLP. In CY24, the number of active borrowers under MFIs and RSPs recorded a modest growth of approximately ~1.17%. Concurrently, the average loan size increased to ~PKR 44,762, up from ~PKR 38,777 in CY23. Portfolio quality also demonstrated improvement, with the infection ratio declining to ~1.57% in CY24, compared to ~2.80% in the previous year.


Relative Position

TMF is positioned as a small-tier institution within Pakistan’s microfinance sector. Despite its modest scale, TMF benefits from the longstanding experience of its sponsors, who have been actively engaged in the domain of microfinance and community development since 1998. This historical involvement has contributed to the foundation’s strategic direction and operational resilience. As of June 2025, TMF holds approximately ~1% of the market share in terms of Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP), reflecting its focused outreach and niche positioning within the broader financial inclusion landscape. To sustain and expand its lending operations, TMF relies on a combination of internally generated capital and external borrowing, which enables it to maintain liquidity and meet the credit needs of its target clientele. In FY25, TMF had successfully built a borrower base of around ~4,9000 active clients, underscoring its commitment to serving underserved and low-income communities. The foundation’s operational footprint spans ~19 districts, allowing it to reach diverse populations across both rural and semi-urban areas. TMF’s strategic emphasis on localized service delivery, combined with its prudent financial management and experienced leadership, continues to support its mission of promoting inclusive and sustainable microfinance solutions.




Revenue

In FY25, TMF generated an interest income of PKR ~1.1bn. This reflects a decline when compared to FY24, in which the foundation reported interest earnings of PKR ~1.3bn. The entire interest income for both periods was derived exclusively from advances extended to borrowers, indicating that TMF’s revenue model remains firmly rooted in its core lending operations.This reduction in interest income is attributed to various factors, such as changes in lending volumes, portfolio composition, interest rate adjustments, or borrower repayment behavior. Despite the year-on-year decrease, the foundation continues to rely on its loan portfolio as the sole source of interest-based revenue, underscoring its focus on microcredit as a primary financial service. The consistent reliance on advances for income generation highlights TMF’s commitment to its mission of providing accessible financial solutions to underserved communities, while also emphasizing the importance of portfolio performance and prudent credit management in sustaining its financial health.


Profitability

In FY25, TMF reported a net profit of PKR ~7mln, marking a significant turnaround from the previous year’s loss of PKR ~256mln in FY24. This positive financial outcome is primarily attributed to a notable reduction in operating expenses and a decline in finance costs during the year. These cost efficiencies reflect improved resource management and more favorable borrowing terms, contributing to the foundation’s overall financial recovery. Additionally, TMF experienced a substantial improvement in its interest rate spread, which rose to ~14.1% in FY25 compared to  ~6.3% in FY24. This increase indicates enhanced profitability from core lending operations, driven by better yield on advances and more efficient cost of funds. The combination of reduced expenditures, lower financing costs, and a strengthened spread underscores TMF’s progress in stabilizing its financial position and enhancing operational sustainability. These developments position the foundation for continued growth and improved service delivery in the microfinance sector.


Sustainability

Looking ahead, TMF has outlined a strategic plan aimed at expanding its market presence while simultaneously strengthening its existing operational infrastructure. The foundation intends to enhance its outreach by entering new geographic areas and deepening its engagement with underserved communities, thereby increasing its share within the microfinance sector. In parallel, TMF is focused on consolidating its current branch network to improve service delivery, operational efficiency, and resource optimization. This consolidation effort involves streamlining processes, upgrading branch capabilities, and reinforcing internal controls to ensure consistent performance across all locations. By pursuing a dual strategy of expansion and consolidation, TMF aims to scale its impact, improve client experience, and reinforce its commitment to financial inclusion. These initiatives are aligned with the foundation’s long-term vision of becoming a more agile, responsive, and sustainable institution within Pakistan’s microfinance landscape.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

TMF continues to face elevated levels of credit risk, as evidenced by key portfolio indicators reported as of June 2025. One of the primary contributing factors to this heightened risk is the foundation’s geographical concentration, which limits diversification and increases vulnerability to region-specific economic and environmental challenges. As of FY25, TMF’s Portfolio at Risk (PAR) was recorded at approximately ~10.3%, marking a significant increase from ~5.8% reported during the same period in FY24. This upward trend indicates a deterioration in portfolio quality and suggests growing repayment challenges among borrowers. Similarly, the infection ratio, which reflects the proportion of non-performing loans within the total loan portfolio, stood at around ~10% as of June 2025, compared to ~6% in FY24. The rise in both PAR and infection ratio underscores the need for strengthened credit risk management practices, enhanced borrower screening, and more robust recovery mechanisms. TMF’s management continues to monitor these indicators closely and is expected to implement targeted interventions to mitigate risk exposure, improve portfolio performance, and safeguard the financial sustainability of the institution.


Market Risk

As of June 2025, the investment portfolio of  TMF consists entirely of short-term Term Deposit Receipts (TDRs) placed with three major commercial banks: Habib Bank Limited (HBL), Muslim Commercial Bank (MCB), and Bank of Punjab (BOP). The total value of these deposits amounts to  PKR ~1,331mln. Out of this total, TMF has invested PKR ~625mln with HBL, PKR ~400mln with MCB, and PKR ~306mln with BOP. These investments reflect TMF’s conservative financial strategy, aimed at preserving capital while earning stable returns on surplus funds. By maintaining short-term deposits with reputable financial institutions, TMF ensures liquidity and minimizes risk exposure. This approach supports the foundation’s operational needs and aligns with its commitment to prudent financial management.


Funding

At FY25 long-term loans of TMF mainly includes loans from PMIC of ~1,213mln and PKR ~320mln from SBP. There is also the subordinated loan of PKR 400mln from TRDP.


Cashflows & Coverages

As of FY25, TMF’s liquid assets were PKR ~1,475mln, showing a decline from PKR 1,795mln in FY24. This downward trend indicates a weakening in the Company’s liquidity position. To strengthen its financial flexibility and ensure preparedness for unexpected cash requirements, TMF should consider increasing its allocation to liquid assets.


Capital Adequacy

As of FY25, TMF equity-to-total-assets ratio stood at ~3.5%. This reflects an improvement from the ~3.0% recorded in June 2024. When compared to industry peers, this level of capitalization is considered adequate and indicates a stable financial position.


 
 

Sep-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Management Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances - net 1,774 2,976 3,505
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Other Earning Assets 1,420 1,478 1,678
4. Non-Earning Assets 2,217 1,632 1,215
5. Non-Performing Finances-net 0 0 (7)
Total Assets 5,412 6,086 6,391
6. Deposits 0 0 0
7. Borrowings 4,856 5,387 5,570
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 366 517 464
Total Liabilities 5,222 5,904 6,034
Equity 190 182 358
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 1,189 1,327 1,260
2. Mark Up Expensed (870) (1,164) (905)
3. Non Mark Up Income 299 331 292
Total Income 619 494 647
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (407) (567) (667)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (204) (183) (109)
Pre-Tax Profit 7 (256) (130)
6. Taxes 0 0 0
Profit After Tax 7 (256) (130)
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 46.3% 38.7% 33.7%
Minimum Lending Rate 57.6% 55.9% 45.0%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 80.3% 69.3% 74.9%
Return on Equity 4.0% -94.8% -29.0%
Cost per Borrower Ratio N/A N/A N/A
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity 0.0% 0.0% -1.9%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 3.5% 3.0% 5.6%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets N/A N/A N/A
Capital Adequacy Ratio N/A N/A N/A
Capital Formation Rate [(Profit After Tax - Cash Dividend ) / Equity] 4.1% -71.5% -24.1%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings 111.0% 134.1% 47.7%
Demand Deposit Coverage Ratio N/A N/A N/A
Liquid Assets/Top 20 Depositors N/A N/A N/A
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio N/A N/A N/A
4. Credit Risk
Top 20 Advances / Advances 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PAR 30 Ratio 10.3% 5.8% 5.0%
Write Off Ratio 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
True Infection Ratio 10.3% 5.8% 5.0%
Risk Coverage Ratio (PAR 30) 100.0% 100.0% 103.7%

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

Sep-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-25

www.pacra.com