Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
17-Oct-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
19-Oct-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Oct-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
21-Oct-22 A A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Oct-21 A A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (GAL), a subsidiary of Bibojee Services (Pvt.) Limited and part of the Bibojee Group founded by the late Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Habibullah Khan Khattak, was established in 1981 and listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange in 1992. The Company operates an assembly facility at Port Qasim, Karachi, with a combined installed capacity of 4,800 commercial vehicles and 6,000 passenger vehicles annually. Its product lineup mainly comprises JAC, Dongfeng, and Renault-branded trucks, supported by a nationwide 3S network.

Rating Rationale

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (“GAL” or “the Company”) is a listed entity engaged in the distribution and supported assembly of commercial vehicles in Pakistan. Operating under the umbrella of the Bibojee Group of Companies, GAL benefits from diversified group synergies across automobiles, textiles, insurance, construction, and tyres. GAL’s product portfolio remains concentrated in commercial vehicles, where the Company maintains strategic collaborations with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co. Ltd. (JAC Motors), China, for light, medium, and heavy-duty trucks. Additionally, brand associations with Dongfeng and Renault Trucks further strengthen its position within the commercial vehicle segment. In the passenger vehicle segment, the phasing out of the Chery Tiggo series last year created a gap in the portfolio; to strategically address this, GAL introduced the JAC T9 Hunter, which has gained a remarkable market acceptability during its launch owing to its attractive features and competitive pricing, thereby reinforcing the Company’s passenger vehicle offering. Governance remains central to GAL’s operations, with an independent Board ensuring transparency, accountability, and strategic oversight, supported by a professional management team that drives operational excellence and sustainable growth. At the industry level, Pakistan’s trucks and buses segment is inherently cyclical and closely aligned with economic activity, logistics demand, and infrastructure development. After steep contractions in FY23 (-41%) and FY24 (-31%), sales volumes rebounded strongly in FY25 (till June 2025) to ~5,232 units, reflecting a robust ~98% YoY increase. This recovery was driven primarily by a notable decline in the policy rate and inflation, which improved financing feasibility and purchasing power. The momentum was further supported by improved liquidity, exchange rate stability, and the easing of supply-side bottlenecks, thus improving consumer confidence. The policy-driven fleet modernization and emission compliance under the NTP-2018 are expected to stimulate demand for modern, fuel-efficient vehicles. According to PAMA data, GAL’s share in the trucks segment stood at ~4% in FY25 (198 units) compared to ~7% (164 units) in FY24, reflecting heightened competition and industry cyclicality. Conversely, the Company has shown remarkable growth in the light commercial vehicle (LCV) category through the JAC X-200, achieving ~13% share (1,274 units) in FY25 versus ~3.1% (727 units) in FY24. Based upon the significant improvement in volumes, the consolidated revenue sharply jumped to ~PKR 34.5bln (FY24: ~PKR 9.4bln). Resultantly, margins showed a considerable improvement at all levels, and the Company’s bottom line demonstrated exceptional growth and recorded at ~PKR 4.1bln (FY24: ~PKR 365mln). Financial risk profile is demonstrated by strong coverages, cashflows. Total debt was reduced to ~PKR 880mln, entirely comprising long-term borrowings with no reliance on short-term debt, resulting in a modest leveraging ratio of ~5.6% (FY24: ~18.1%).

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on GAL’s ability to sustain its growth momentum in terms of revenue and profitability. The adequacy of operating cash flows to meet working capital and expansion needs will be critical. The Company’s strategy to effectively managing is competition, and improvement in relative position shall remain imperative. Furthermore, GAL’s strong commitment to regulatory compliance and governance standards continues to reinforce its operational credibility and stakeholder confidence.

Profile
Legal Structure

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (GAL) is a public listed entity with a free float of ~36% shares as of Sep'25. It got listed on Karachi Stock Exchange (now 'Pakistan Stock Exchange') in 1992.


Background

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited was incorporated on August 8, 1981 as a private limited entity and was subsequently converted into a public limited company on May 24, 1992. The Company is a subsidiary of "Bibojee Services (Private) Limited".


Operations

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (GAL) operates as an automobile assembler and manufacturer with its production facility located at Port Qasim, Karachi. The plant is equipped with modern infrastructure, including a cab metal shop, paint shop, trimming shop, chassis drilling, frame riveting, main assembly lines, engine assembly and testing, body shop, and axle assembly, enabling end-to-end vehicle assembly. The facility covers a total area of over 100,000 square meters with a built-up area exceeding 34,000 square meters, and it has an installed capacity of producing around 4,800 trucks, buses, and pickups, along with 6,000 vehicles at the car plant annually on a single-shift basis. GAL assembles and markets a diversified range of vehicles, including JAC trucks and Dongfeng/Renault commercial vehicles, while also maintaining import and distribution arrangements. The operational setup provides GAL with a moderate scale of production, while its reliance on imported completely knocked down (CKD) kits exposes it to supply chain and regulatory risks. Nonetheless, the diversified product base within the commercial vehicle segment and continuous upgradation of facilities underpin the Company’s operational profile.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Bibojee Services (Private) Limited directly owns ~56.0% stake in the Company. Other shareholders include Banks (~1.29%), and Insurance Companies (~0.07%), while the remaining are held by DFIs, NBFIs, the general public & others.


Stability

Bibojee Group of Companies represents a family with a history of entrepreneurship spanning over four decades. It operates through the holding company "Bibojee Services (Private) Limited". This provides a formal structure to the group and a platform for relatively smooth succession matters amongst family members.


Business Acumen

Bibojee is the parent company of the Bibojee Group of Companies with interests in various industries, including automobiles, textiles, insurance, construction, and tyre manufacturing. Bibojee group's understanding of the business is strong.


Financial Strength

With strategic investments across the Textile, Insurance, Automobile, and Construction sectors, this business group reflects strong financial strength. Fortified by robust risk management strategies, ensuring sustained growth across varied market conditions.


Governance
Board Structure

The board maintains separate roles for the Chairman and the CEO, comprising ten members: one executive director, six non-executive directors, and three independent directors. This balanced mix of independent and executive directors equips the board to ensure comprehensive decision-making and robust governance practices.


Members’ Profile

The Board members are professionals with diverse experience across various sectors. Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak, the Chairman, brings specialized knowledge from the Auto & Allied sector. Each board member offers a unique blend of seasoned expertise and skills, collectively ensuring robust governance.


Board Effectiveness

The board, comprised of skilled and diverse individuals, conducts frequent meetings to ensure clear communication and responsiveness to stakeholders. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through its strategic vision, diverse expertise, and rigorous governance practices. Minutes are meticulously documented following each meeting, facilitating seamless follow-up actions.


Financial Transparency

An effective Internal Audit department reporting to the Audit Committee is in place that ensures transparency & compliance, identifies risks, and provides valuable insights to the management. M/s. ShineWing Hameed Chaudhari & Company, a QCR rated firm, has expressed unmodified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for financial period ending June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is divided into functional departments, with HODs reporting to the CEO. Major departments include Finance, HR & Admin, Quality Control, Sales & Marketing, and Plant Operations. This well-balanced structure allows for efficient communication and collaboration within different departments.


Management Team

The Company's management team consists of highly qualified professionals with a wide range of skills and diverse experience. Mr. Ahmad Kuli Khan Khattak, the CEO, has over 15 years of experience and is supported by an adept management team. Mr. Faisal, the CFO, brings over 11 years of experience and a diverse skill set, providing exceptional financial leadership and strategic guidance. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities further enhance the effectiveness of the Company's structure.


Effectiveness

Every department head is responsible for managing the affairs of their departments. Clearly defined rules & responsibilities, operational agility, and strategic foresight of Company's management team add to the effectiveness of the Company's structure.


MIS

GAL has implemented the Sidat Hyder Financial Business software package, supported by a regular update and technical support agreement with the vendor. These technological advancements enable GIL to remain competitive and achieve its strategic goals in a dynamic business environment.


Control Environment

The Company's structure comprises various departments, each with an effective Internal Control System. A robust MIS supports management's reporting needs and strengthens the control environment, with built-in controls to avoid conflicts of interest.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The trucks and buses industry in Pakistan is closely tied to overall macroeconomic activity, logistics demand, and infrastructure development. The sector has historically exhibited cyclical patterns: after total sales volumes of ~3,647 units in FY20, the industry rebounded strongly in FY21 and FY22 with growth of 19.2% and 49.5%, respectively, supported by post-pandemic resumption of industrial activity and transportation demand. However, the momentum could not be sustained, as volumes contracted sharply by 41.0% in FY23 and further by 31.2% in FY24, reflecting the combined impact of high inflation, policy rate hikes, exchange rate volatility, and constrained access to vehicle financing. In the ongoing fiscal year (FY25, up to June 2025), the industry has demonstrated a strong rebound, with sales volumes rising to ~5,232 units, reflecting an impressive 98.1% year-on-year growth. This recovery is underpinned by improved liquidity in the transport sector, partial stability in the exchange rate, and some normalization of supply chain disruptions. Nevertheless, the sustainability of this growth remains uncertain, as the industry continues to face structural vulnerabilities. A key challenge is its heavy reliance on imported Completely Knocked Down (CKD) kits, which exposes assemblers to foreign exchange risk, import restrictions, and global supply chain shocks. On the policy front, two developments are critical for shaping future dynamics. First, the financing cap of PKR 3 million per borrower—still applied by commercial banks—continues to constrain demand in the mid-to-heavy vehicle category, limiting fleet expansion by logistics operators. Second, the Budget 2025–26 has introduced major reforms to the import regime: commercial imports of used vehicles up to five years old will be permitted from September 2025, with age limits fully removed by July 2026, subject to quality checks. Additionally, a 40% regulatory duty on such imports will gradually reduce until its removal by July 2029. While these reforms are expected to expand consumer choice and intensify competition, they may also put pressure on the market share and margins of local assemblers in the medium term. Overall, despite a promising rebound in FY25, the trucks and buses industry remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts, policy frameworks, and external shocks. The trajectory ahead will largely depend on the pace of economic stabilization, financing availability, and the industry’s ability to adapt to a more liberalized import environment.


Relative Position

Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (GAL) holds a distinctive position in Pakistan’s commercial vehicle industry through its collaboration with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co. Ltd. (JAC Motors), China, a globally renowned manufacturer. GAL’s portfolio comprises a range of Chinese-origin JAC trucks, offering light, medium, and heavy-duty commercial vehicles designed to meet the evolving transportation and logistics needs of the domestic market. Over the years, GAL has built a stable and growing market presence, with its truck market share fluctuating between ~2.4% in FY20 and 7.1% in FY21, and currently standing at ~4.5% in FY25 (till June 2025), according to Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association (PAMA) data. This reflects its ability to cater to fleet operators, logistics companies, and small-to-medium enterprises seeking cost-effective, durable, and fuel-efficient vehicles. GAL’s nationwide 3S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts) network strengthens customer retention and enhances its brand presence across Pakistan. Looking ahead, the National Trucking Policy 2018 (NTP-2018) plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of the logistics and transportation industry. The policy emphasizes fleet modernization, axle-load management, safety standards, and emission compliance (Euro-II and above). These measures are expected to stimulate demand for modern, high-capacity trucks that reduce logistics costs and improve operational efficiency. GAL is strategically positioned to align its JAC product offerings with these regulatory objectives, enabling it to capitalize on the policy-driven demand for fleet renewal.


Revenues

Due to the highly cyclical nature of the auto industry and persistent macroeconomic challenges impacting the fragile domestic economy, GAL’s topline performance has exhibited volatility. For FY25, consolidated revenue stood at PKR ~34,512mln, reflecting the company’s strong rebound in volumes and improved product mix that emphasized higher-value models. Within this, revenue for 9MFY25 was recorded at PKR ~15,308mln, significantly higher than PKR ~9,413mln in FY24. On the profitability front, GAL posted a net profit of PKR ~4,096mln in FY25, while earnings for 9MFY25 reached PKR ~2,274mln, compared to PKR ~365mln in FY24. This turnaround was supported by operating leverage from increased sales volumes, disciplined cost management, and the introduction of premium product offerings, which collectively enhanced margins and overall financial performance.


Margins

The Company’s margins strengthened considerably in FY25, underpinned by enhanced operational efficiency, disciplined cost controls, and a strategic tilt towards a more favorable product mix. The gross margin ratio for FY25 stood at ~18.4%, reflecting a substantial improvement over ~12.0% in FY24, with 9MFY25 even higher at ~19.8% due to stronger interim volumes and premium offerings. Operating margins also showed notable growth, reaching ~15.6% in FY25, compared to ~6.7% in FY24, while 9MFY25 had peaked at ~16.6%, supported by economies of scale and improved operational leverage. Similarly, the net profit margin improved to ~11.9% in FY25, a significant uplift from ~3.9% in FY24, with 9MFY25 recording ~14.9% on the back of strong topline growth, optimized expense management, and reduced finance costs. These improvements, though partially offset by macroeconomic pressures such as currency volatility and inflationary trends, underscore GAL’s strengthened profitability profile.


Sustainability

Although the Company generally prepares financial projections, developing prudent projections that align with industry dynamics and market trends is essential to navigate market fluctuations, and ensure long-term resilience.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements primarily arise from trade payables and are funded through a combination of internal cash generation and short-term borrowings. In FY25, inventory days improved to ~74 days, compared to ~112 days in FY24, reflecting smoother supply chain flows and better inventory management. For 9MFY25, however, inventory days had temporarily spiked to ~133 days due to import congestion in 1QFY25, which caused delays in the clearance of raw materials and components. Trade receivable days also declined meaningfully, reaching ~16 days in FY25 versus ~51 days in FY24, with 9MFY25 at ~26 days, supported by tighter credit controls, enhanced collection mechanisms, and a deliberate shift towards cash-based sales. As a result, net working capital days reduced to ~62 days in FY25, compared to ~119 days in FY24, with 9MFY25 even lower at ~16 days, underscoring accelerated receivable collections and supplier credit optimization during the interim period. Overall, the improvement in working capital metrics highlights the Company’s resilience and adaptability in navigating external challenges while maintaining operational continuity in a difficult macroeconomic environment.


Coverages

The Company’s cash flow coverages strengthened notably in FY25, supported by robust operating performance and improved working capital efficiency. Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) rose to PKR ~4,140mln in FY25, compared to PKR ~712mln in FY24, while 9MFY25 had stood at PKR ~2,154mln, reflecting sustained momentum during the year. Consequently, the interest coverage ratio improved sharply to ~23.5x in FY25, versus ~1.6x in FY24, with 9MFY25 at ~12.1x, highlighting the Company’s enhanced capacity to comfortably meet finance costs from operational earnings. Similarly, the core debt coverage ratio strengthened to ~10.3x in FY25, compared to ~0.9x in FY24, with 9MFY25 recorded at ~6.0x, underscoring a marked improvement in debt-servicing ability. Overall, these developments demonstrate GAL’s strengthened financial flexibility and liquidity profile, positioning it favorably to withstand external shocks while maintaining operational continuity amidst a challenging macroeconomic backdrop.


Capitalization

The Company maintains a moderately leveraged capital structure, reflecting prudent financial management and a conscious effort to reduce reliance on external financing. As of FY25, total debt stood at PKR ~880mln, down from PKR ~2,377mln in FY24, supported by sustained deleveraging efforts. Within this, long-term borrowings amounted to PKR ~553mln in FY25, highlighting a preference for more stable funding sources and lower refinancing risk. Importantly, the debt profile now comprises entirely long-term borrowings, with no short-term debt outstanding. During 9MFY25, total debt had been recorded at PKR ~936mln, with PKR ~696mln in long-term borrowings, following the repayment of all short-term debt. Supported by stronger earnings and cash flow generation, the gearing ratio improved to ~5.6% in FY25, compared to ~18.1% in FY24, with 9MFY25 at ~6.7%. This notable decline in leverage underscores GAL’s strategic focus on deleveraging, strengthening its equity base, and enhancing financial flexibility, thereby positioning the Company to better withstand macroeconomic volatility while preserving headroom for future growth and expansion initiatives.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 7,840 7,720 5,447
2. Investments 4,670 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 2,137 1,629 1,271
4. Current Assets 19,337 7,255 5,904
a. Inventories 10,603 3,449 2,346
b. Trade Receivables 1,633 1,447 1,162
5. Total Assets 33,983 16,605 12,623
6. Current Liabilities 17,559 2,970 1,896
a. Trade Payables 3,861 1,595 648
7. Borrowings 880 2,377 2,445
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 667 468 360
10. Net Assets 14,877 10,790 7,921
11. Shareholders' Equity 14,877 10,790 7,921
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 34,512 9,413 13,105
a. Cost of Good Sold (28,152) (8,280) (11,972)
2. Gross Profit 6,360 1,134 1,132
a. Operating Expenses (971) (501) (514)
3. Operating Profit 5,389 633 619
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 170 256 164
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 5,560 889 783
a. Total Finance Cost 440 (399) (393)
b. Taxation (1,904) (125) (216)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 4,096 365 174
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 4,140 712 587
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,901 253 270
c. Changes in Working Capital 7,078 (297) (2,221)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 10,979 (44) (1,951)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (4,581) 69 655
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (1,596) (164) 382
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 4,802 (138) (914)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 266.6% -28.2% 105.3%
b. Gross Profit Margin 18.4% 12.0% 8.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 11.9% 3.9% 1.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 32.5% 4.4% -12.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 31.9% 3.9% 2.2%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 91 163 119
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 62 119 96
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.1 2.4 3.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 32.2 2.3 2.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 10.3 0.9 0.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.2 4.1 6.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 5.6% 18.1% 23.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 9.8 56.4 88.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.6% 19.3% 17.6%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com