Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
17-Oct-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
19-Oct-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Oct-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
21-Oct-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
22-Oct-21 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Ghandhara Industries Limited, established in 1963 and listed on the PSX, is the assembler of Isuzu trucks and buses in Pakistan. Majority-owned by the Bibojee Group, the Company operates a manufacturing facility at S.I.T.E., Karachi, producing trucks, buses, and pickups, supported by a nationwide 3S service network.

Rating Rationale

Ghandhara Industries Limited (GIL), a public listed entity, operates as the assembler and progressive manufacturer of Isuzu trucks, buses, and pick-ups in Pakistan. GIL functions under the umbrella of the Bibojee Group of Companies, a diversified conglomerate with interests in automobiles, textiles, insurance, construction, and tyres. The Company’s production facility, located at Sindh Industrial Estate (S.I.T.E), Karachi, enables the manufacturing of a diversified portfolio, including light-duty (N-Series), medium/heavy-duty (F-Series and C-Series) trucks, D-Max pickups, buses, and customized vehicle bodies (such as troop carriers, water bowsers, and mobile workshops). GIL benefits from its long-standing technical collaboration with Isuzu, Japan, and Thailand for pickups, which provides access to global designs and quality standards. The Board, supported by an experienced management team, ensures strong governance, robust internal controls, and a framework that drives operational efficiency and long-term sustainability. The trucks and buses industry in Pakistan is inherently cyclical, influenced by infrastructure development, logistics demand, and macroeconomic conditions. After steep contractions in FY23 (-41%) and FY24 (-31%), volumes rebounded ~96.7% in FY25 (till June 2025) to ~5,232 units, primarily driven by lower policy rates, moderating inflation, and supported by improved liquidity, exchange rate stability, and eased supply bottlenecks, which collectively strengthened consumer confidence. The National Transport Policy 2018, emphasizing fleet renewal, axle load management, and Euro-II+ standards, is expected to support demand for contemporary trucks, an area where GIL remains strongly positioned through its collaboration with Isuzu. GIL has steadily reinforced its leadership in the truck segment, capturing a market share of ~65.4% in FY25 (till June 2025), up from ~57% in FY24, driven by its exclusive Japanese Isuzu portfolio, recognized for durability, fuel efficiency, superior resale value, and dependable after-sales support. In the global commercial vehicle market, Japanese players play a leading role in the electric vehicle (EV) segment, particularly in trucks and buses. This growing participation is intensifying competition, accelerating technology adoption, and shaping customer expectations worldwide, highlighting the need for strategic innovation and strong market positioning for local industry leaders. In terms of product contribution, GIL’s topline remains predominantly driven by trucks, which accounted for ~77.5% of sales in FY25 (FY24: 71.0%), reflecting its entrenched leadership in the segment. Buses contributed ~12.5% (FY24: 8.2%), body fabrication ~2.6% (FY24: 10.4%), and the D-Max pickup series ~6.9% (FY24: 8.5%). Revenue from parts, accessories, and services stood at ~0.5% (FY24: 1.9%). The increasing concentration of trucks underscores the Company’s strength in capturing logistics demand, though it also exposes revenues to cyclical industry trends. Based on robust volume growth, GIL’s revenue surged to ~PKR 37.4bln in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 14.7bln). Resultantly, margins improved markedly across all levels, with the bottom line rising to ~PKR 4.5bln (FY24: ~PKR 781mln). The financial risk profile is reflected in strong coverage ratios and cash flow generation. Total debt declined sharply to ~PKR 106mln in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 1.45bln), entirely comprising long-term borrowings with no reliance on short-term debt, resulting in a minimal leverage ratio of ~1.5% (FY24: ~14.2%) and an interest coverage of ~59.8x (FY24: 2.5x).

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on GIL’s ability to sustain its topline growth and profitability trajectory, while maintaining strong liquidity and low leverage. Adequate cash flow generation to meet working capital and expansion needs, along with consistency in performance indicators, will be essential for the ratings going forward.

Profile
Legal Structure

Ghandhara Industries Limited (hereinafter referred as 'GIL' or 'the Company') is a public listed entity with a free float of ~35% as of Sep'25. The corporate office of the Company is in F-3, Hub Chawki Road, S.I.T.E. area, Karachi.


Background

The Company was originally established in 1963 by General Motors Overseas Distribution Company and was subsequently acquired by Late Lt. General (R) Habibullah Khan Khattak. It was nationalized in 1972 and renamed National Motors Limited. In 1992, following privatization, Lt. General (R) Habibullah Khan Khattak regained ownership and reinstated the name “Ghandhara Industries Limited.”


Operations

Ghandhara Industries Limited (GIL) operates as the assembler and progressive manufacturer for the Isuzu truck, bus, and pickups in Pakistan, employing state-of-the-art facilities based in the S.I.T.E., Karachi assembly plant. Its comprehensive product portfolio encompasses a wide range of light-duty (N-Series), medium/high-duty (F-Series and C-Series) trucks, along with D-Max pickups, various buses, and a sophisticated vehicle body fabrication line offering customized solutions such as bus bodies, water bowsers, mobile workshops, troop carriers, and more. Operating as a one-stop solution provider, GIL ensures strong after-sales support through its extensive 3S dealership network (Sales, Service, and Spares) established across major Pakistani cities. The company’s strategic alliance with the globally renowned Isuzu brand underpins its competitive strength, enabling GIL to deliver products known for their reliability, fuel efficiency, and payload capabilities, critical attributes in the demanding transport sector. GIL places strong emphasis on leveraging technological enhancements to boost operational efficiency and quality.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Majority stake of the entity is held by Bibojee Group of Companies, whereas Bibojee Services (Private) Limited directly owns ~39% shares and Ghandhara Automobiles Limited has ~19%. Other shares are held by Corporates, Financial Institutions, Banks, and individual members.


Stability

Bibojee Group of Companies represents a family with a history of entrepreneurship spanning over four decades. It operates through the holding company "Bibojee Services (Private) Limited". This provides a formal structure to the group and a platform for relatively smooth succession matters amongst family members.


Business Acumen

Bibojee is the parent company of the Bibojee Group of Companies, under whose umbrella come automobile companies, textile, insurance, construction, and tyre manufacturing concerns. Bibojee group's understanding of the business is strong.


Financial Strength

With strategic investments across the Textile, Insurance, Automobile, and Construction sectors, this business group reflects strong financial strength. Fortified by robust risk management strategies, ensuring sustained growth across varied market conditions.


Governance
Board Structure

The board maintains separate roles for the Chairman and the CEO, comprising nine members: two executive directors, four non-executive directors, and three independent directors. Comprising a balanced mix of independent and executive directors, the board is well-equipped to ensure comprehensive decision-making and robust governance practices.


Members’ Profile

The Board members are professionals with experience in managing business affairs in different sectors. Lt. Gen. (Retd.) Ali Kuli Khan Khattak, the Chairman of the Board, has diversified experience in the automotive and allied sectors, bringing specialized and comprehensive experience and knowledge to the board. Each board member brings an impressive blend of seasoned expertise and diverse skill sets, which collectively ensure robust governance.


Board Effectiveness

The board, comprised of skilled and diverse individuals, conducts frequent meetings to ensure clear communication and responsiveness to stakeholders. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through its strategic vision, diverse expertise, and rigorous governance practices. Minutes are meticulously documented following each meeting, facilitating seamless follow-up actions.


Financial Transparency

An effective Internal Audit department reporting to the Audit Committee is in place that ensures transparency & compliance, identifies risks, and provides valuable insights to the management. M/s. ShineWing Hameed Chaudhari & Company, a QCR-rated firm, has expressed an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements of the Company for the financial year ended June 30th, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is divided into functional departments, with HODs reporting to the CEO. Major departments include Finance, HR & Admin, Quality Control, Sales & Marketing, and Material Management. This well-balanced structure allows for efficient communication and collaboration within different departments.


Management Team

Management of the Company comprises qualified professionals with a wide range of skills and diversified experience. Mr. Ahmad Kuli Khan Khattak is the CEO of the Company. He has an overall experience of over 30 years and he is assisted by an able management team. Muhammad Aamir, the CFO of the Company, brings over 22 years of experience and a diverse skill set, ensuring exceptional financial leadership and strategic guidance. Clearly defined rules & responsibilities in an organization add to the effectiveness of the Company's structure.


Effectiveness

Every department head is responsible to manage the affairs of their departments. Clearly defined rules & responsibilities, operational agility, and strategic foresight of management team add to the effectiveness of the Company's structure.


MIS

GIL has an integrated ERP business software package that unifies all aspects of its operations. This software streamlines processes, enhances data accuracy, and delivers real-time insights, empowering informed decision-making. These technological advancements position GIL to remain competitive and achieve its strategic goals in a dynamic business environment.


Control Environment

The Company's corporate structure is organized into various departments, each with its own effective Internal Control System. A robust MIS supports management's reporting needs and strengthens the overall control environment. Built-in controls are in place to ensure that conflicts of interest are avoided.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The trucks and buses industry in Pakistan remains highly cyclical and is tightly linked to macroeconomic activity, infrastructure investment, and logistics demand across multiple sectors. In FY25 (till June 2025), the industry demonstrated a notable rebound, with total commercial vehicle (CV) volumes surging by ~96.7% year-on-year (YoY) to ~5,162 units. Truck production rose to ~4,366 units, while bus production climbed to ~796 units, reflecting renewed demand from logistics, construction, and oil marketing companies. The uptrend was supported by relative stability in the exchange rate, easing of supply chain bottlenecks, and partial revival in transport sector liquidity. However, the sustainability of this recovery remains uncertain, as the industry continues to be vulnerable to foreign exchange volatility, CKD supply restrictions, and evolving regulatory measures. In contrast, FY24 marked one of the most challenging years for the sector. According to PACRA’s sector review, production and sales volumes fell by ~30.6% YoY, while industry revenues contracted by ~32.1% YoY, with average operating margins slipping into negative territory due to persistent cost-push inflation, high policy rates, and elevated input costs. Structural bottlenecks, including heavy reliance on imported Completely Knocked Down (CKD) kits, exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, and limited fleet renewal, further constrained industry competitiveness. Despite some stability in the macro backdrop, with GDP expanding by ~2.4% and Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM) growing by ~0.9% during the year, the trucks and buses segment remained muted, reflecting suppressed consumer and institutional demand. PAMA statistics validated this weak performance, as total CV production dropped from ~3,775 units in FY23 to ~2,623 units in FY24 (–30.5% YoY), underscoring the impact of rising inflation, tightened financing availability, and rupee volatility on sector volumes. Forward-looking, the National Trucking Policy 2018 is expected to play a significant role in reshaping demand. The policy emphasizes fleet modernization, enforcement of axle load limits, safety standards, and emissions compliance. Once fully implemented, it could drive replacement demand for outdated trucks, creating a growth opportunity for formal sector OEMs like GIL, Master, and Hino.


Relative Position

Within this competitive environment, Ghandhara Industries Limited (GIL) has consistently upheld its leading market position in trucks through the exclusive assembly and distribution of Isuzu commercial vehicles. During FY25 (till June), GIL further consolidated its leadership, producing ~2,891 units, which translated into an elevated ~65.4% market share. By comparison, Master Motors’ share stood at ~23.5% (~1,024 units), while Hino and JAC lagged at ~6.6% and ~4.5%, respectively. This expansion reflects GIL’s ability to scale volumes faster than peers in a recovering market, reinforcing its dominance in the truck segment. In FY24, GIL produced ~1,284 trucks, securing a dominant ~58.3% share of industry truck production, as per PAMA. This comfortably outpaced peers, with Master Motors holding ~23.8% (~524 units), Hino at ~11.2% (~246 units), and Ghandhara Automobiles Limited (~JAC) at ~6.8% (~150 units).


Revenues

Financially, GIL delivered a strong performance in FY25, reflecting sustained recovery and improved operational strength. Revenue rose to ~PKR 37,463mln in FY25, up by ~155% from ~PKR 14,666mln in FY24, driven by higher sales volumes and favorable pricing dynamics. The Company’s bottom line also posted exceptional growth, with net profit reaching ~PKR 4,584mln in FY25, reflecting an increase compared to ~PKR 781mln in FY24. Profitability metrics strengthened across the board, with gross margins improving on account of scale efficiencies, operating margins reflecting cost discipline, and net margins rising to healthy double-digit levels. These improvements underscore GIL’s strengthened financial profile, enhanced resilience, and renewed capacity to pursue growth initiatives amidst a challenging macroeconomic environment.


Margins

The Company’s margins posted a notable improvement during the review period, reflecting a combination of favorable pricing dynamics, operational efficiencies, and lower financing costs. The gross profit margin rose to ~24.3% in FY25 (FY24: ~19.6%), supported by revised product pricing amidst rising input costs and better capacity utilization that allowed fixed overheads to be absorbed more effectively. In parallel, several cost optimization initiatives, including streamlined production processes and reduced wastages, further strengthened gross profitability. The operating margin improved to ~17.5% in FY25 (FY24: ~9.6%), underscoring enhanced operational control and disciplined expense management. This reflects the Company’s ability to contain administrative and distribution costs while benefiting from economies of scale due to higher volumes. The net margin expanded to ~12.2% in FY25 (FY24: ~5.3%), driven by higher operating profitability and a sharp reduction in finance costs on account of lower borrowings. This significant uplift in margins highlights the Company’s enhanced financial resilience and ability to translate topline growth into sustainable earnings.


Sustainability

Although the Company generally prepares financial projections, developing prudent projections that align with industry dynamics and market trends is essential to navigate market fluctuations, and ensure long-term resilience.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirement is primarily driven by the need to finance inventory buildup and trade receivables, given the nature of its business cycle, which entails a considerable lead time between raw material procurement, production, and eventual sales realization. Historically, this requirement has been met through a combination of internal cash generation and short-term borrowings from financial institutions. In FY25, gross working capital days improved significantly to ~75 days, reflecting a marked reduction from ~163 days in FY24. The improvement was largely attributed to optimized procurement schedules, efficient inventory management, and better alignment of production planning with market demand. Likewise, net working capital days declined to ~67 days in FY25, down from ~150 days in FY24, owing to tighter credit controls, improved receivable collections, and effective supplier payment management. This substantial YoY reduction in working capital intensity underscores the Company’s enhanced operational efficiency, disciplined cash flow management, and strengthened liquidity position, which collectively reduced reliance on external financing.


Coverages

The Company’s free cash flow from operations (FCFO) demonstrated a substantial improvement, rising to PKR ~5,369mln during FY25 (FY24: PKR ~1,203mln). This strong cash generation primarily stemmed from enhanced profitability, efficient working capital management, and lower finance costs. The robust operating cash flows reflect a sound liquidity position, providing the Company with ample flexibility to fund expansion, support working capital requirements, or further deleverage. Consequently, the Company’s coverage indicators strengthened notably. The interest coverage ratio improved significantly to ~59.8x in FY25 (FY24: ~2.5x), highlighting a solid capacity to service finance costs through operational earnings. Similarly, the core coverage ratio rose sharply to ~43.5x in FY25 (FY24: ~2.3x), reflecting enhanced ability to meet fixed obligations. These substantial improvements underscore the Company’s fortified financial risk profile, positioning it favorably against economic uncertainties and reinforcing confidence among creditors and investors.


Capitalization

The Company has maintained a conservative and low-leverage capital structure, which was further strengthened during the review period. Total debt declined sharply to PKR ~106mln by the end of June 2025, down from PKR ~1,452mln in FY24. Notably, the Company had no short-term borrowings outstanding, reflecting its ability to fully finance working capital requirements through internally generated funds. The remaining debt comprised minimal long-term borrowings of PKR ~72mln, translating into a leverage ratio of ~1.5%, compared to ~14.2% in FY24. These metrics highlight the Company’s prudent financial management and strategic reliance on equity and retained earnings for growth rather than external debt. A consistently low leverage ratio not only mitigates financial risk but also provides ample headroom to raise debt in the future for expansion or strategic investments. The strengthened capital structure positions the Company favorably to withstand macroeconomic volatility, such as interest rate fluctuations or currency movements, while reinforcing stakeholder confidence in its long-term financial sustainability.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 6,864 6,087 6,067
2. Investments 8,355 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 14,056 11,970 10,429
a. Inventories 7,755 5,808 5,391
b. Trade Receivables 1,200 647 1,290
5. Total Assets 29,275 18,057 16,495
6. Current Liabilities 15,456 7,512 4,673
a. Trade Payables 1,017 544 506
7. Borrowings 106 1,452 3,353
8. Related Party Exposure 95 29 134
9. Non-Current Liabilities 66 80 113
10. Net Assets 13,552 8,984 8,222
11. Shareholders' Equity 13,552 8,984 8,222
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 37,463 14,666 14,543
a. Cost of Good Sold (28,372) (11,797) (12,242)
2. Gross Profit 9,091 2,869 2,301
a. Operating Expenses (2,529) (1,458) (1,293)
3. Operating Profit 6,562 1,411 1,007
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (18) 177 186
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 6,544 1,589 1,193
a. Total Finance Cost (90) (519) (769)
b. Taxation (1,870) (288) (244)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 4,584 781 179
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 5,369 1,203 985
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 5,248 551 299
c. Changes in Working Capital 3,882 3,258 618
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 9,129 3,809 916
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (8,843) 79 40
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (46) (54) (1,243)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 241 3,834 (287)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 155.4% 0.9% -40.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 24.3% 19.6% 15.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 12.2% 5.3% 1.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 24.7% 30.4% 11.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 40.7% 9.1% 2.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 75 163 196
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 67 150 175
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 1.6 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 70.3 3.0 1.6
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 43.5 2.3 1.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.2 1.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 1.5% 14.2% 29.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 21.9 38.5 100.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.9% 18.0% 16.1%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com