Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
31-Oct-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
31-Oct-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
31-Oct-23 A A1 Stable Maintain -
02-Nov-22 A A1 Stable Upgrade -
25-Oct-21 A A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Zahidjee Textile Mills Limited (“ZTML” or “the Company”) is a public limited company, incorporated in Pakistan on July 17, 1990. The major stake in the Company (~96.6%) is held by the sponsors, Mr. Ahmad Zahid (~75.0%) and Mr. Muhammad Zahid (~21.6%). The remaining stake is held by the general public (~2.1%) and others (~1.3%). The board comprises four independent directors, two executive directors and one non-executive director.

Rating Rationale

Zahidjee Textile Mills Limited (“ZTML” or “the Company”) is an emerging player in Pakistan’s textile industry. The Company operates as a vertically integrated unit, specializing in various categories of yarn (with counts ranging from 8s to 52s), fabric and made-ups. In the preceding years, the Company undertook phased expansions, enhancing its overall production capacity to 150,084 spindles, financed through a debt-to-equity mix of 70:30. This expansion bolstered overall sales volumes, reflecting positively on the Company’s business profile.

The topline demonstrates consistent growth, supported by a strong and diversified customer base. A substantial portion of revenue is derived from domestic sales, contributing PKR 34.6bln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 32.2bln). This growth was underpinned by a prudently managed cost structure and favorable product pricing dynamics for yarn. In the local market, the Company’s foremost product is medium-count yarn, while hospital bed sheets remain the top-selling product in the international market. The funding matrix of the Company revolves around the strategic allocation of funds to short-term investments in term deposit receipts, which supplement the liquidity profile and augment net profitability through the inflow of interest income. Additionally, the sponsors manage several investment properties available at their disposal in case any need may arise.

The top customers of ZTML comprise well-established and prominent players within the textile industry. The margins reflect an improvement primarily due to upfront cotton procurement at reasonable prices. Additionally, the strategic allocation of surplus funds to money market investments, along with monetary easing, further supported net profitability. On the strategic side, management is keenly focused on the spinning segment and intends to grow by capitalizing on the rising demand from domestic markets. The Company funds its working capital requirements through internally generated cash flows and short-term debt, alongside sponsor loans.

The ratings take comfort from the Company’s adequate financial risk profile, supported by an efficiently managed working capital cycle and a moderately leveraged capital structure. Cash flows have improved, while the Company’s coverage indicators have shown a modest recovery. Continuous investments in expansion and BMR activities under the subsidized TERF facility have enabled the Company to maintain an ample production capacity. Currently, the management does not intend to pursue any further expansion.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the sustainability of business operations alongside the continued expansion of volumes. The maintenance of profitability from core operations and improvement in coverage indicators remain essential. Any deterioration in the Company’s financial risk profile will have a negative impact on the assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Zahidjee Textile Mills Limited ("ZTML" or "the Company") is a public limited Company, incorporated on July 17, 1990. It is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited.


Background

Mr. Muhammad Sharif, the former Chairman of ZTML, acquired the listed spinning company Ihsan Yousuf Textile Limited from Allied Bank Limited. The Company was later renamed Zahidjee Textile Mills Limited. Over the years, it was strategically expanded and achieved vertical integration through the installation of additional spindles and the addition of a weaving unit.


Operations

The Company’s operational infrastructure comprises 150,084 spindles and 262 shutterless looms. It is engaged in the manufacture and sale of yarn and fabric, while also exporting a diverse range of value-added products. The registered office of the Company is situated at 131-A, Street P, Upper Mall Scheme, Lahore.The weaving unit is located at 32 KM, Tandlianwala Road, Satyana, District Faisalabad, while the two spinning units are situated at 32 KM, Sheikhupura Road, Faisalabad, and in the M-3 Industrial Estate, Faisalabad, within the province of Punjab. The Company operates with a total energy requirement of 17 megawatts (MW).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority stake in the Company (~96.6%) is held by the sponsors, Mr. Ahmad Zahid (~75.0%) and Mr. Muhammad Zahid (~21.6%). The remaining stake is held by the general public (~2.1%) and others (~1.3%).


Stability

The Company’s ownership is expected to remain stable in the foreseeable future, as evidenced by the smooth transfer of majority shares to Mr. Ahmad Zahid. Although a formal succession plan is not currently in place, it has been decided that Mr. Ahmad Zahid will serve as the successor, holding the largest shareholding in the Company.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family possesses over four decades of extensive experience in textile manufacturing and trading. Their deep-rooted expertise has enabled them to maintain growth through various economic cycles. In addition to their textile venture (ZTML), the family also has an ownership interest in Invest Capital Investment Bank Limited.


Financial Strength

Apart from ZTML, the sponsors own several real estate properties (non-operating land) in Raja Bolay, Tehsil Cantt, and Deve Khurd Kalan, Tehsil Model Town, District Lahore. They sponsors have expressed their willingness to support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The seven-member board comprises six male directors and one female director. It includes four independent directors, two executive directors, and one non-executive director, reflecting a sound governance framework.


Members’ Profile

The Chairman, Mr. Ahmad Zahid, graduated from Babson College, USA. He has been associated with ZTML for the last two years. Mrs. Mehreen Fahad attended the Lahore School of Economics and serves as a director on the board of ZTML. Mr. Muhammad Ali has over 24 years of experience, previously serving as the CEO of Engro Vopak Terminal. Mr. Shahbaz Haider Agha, an executive MBA graduate from NCB&E, Lahore, has 24 years of experience in the insurance industry and is serving as the CEO of Hellenic Sun Insurance Brokers (Pvt.) Limited. Mr. Sajjad Hussain Shah, a qualified CA, brings with him over 28 years of experience in the textile sector. Mr. Faisal Masood, a fellow member of ICAP, brings more than 20 years of diverse experience.


Board Effectiveness

To uphold high standards of governance and transparency, the Company has four board committees in place: the Audit Committee, chaired by Mr. Sajjad Hussain Shah; the HR & Remuneration Committee, chaired by Mr. Shahbaz Haider Agha; the Risk Management Committee, chaired by Mr. Faisal Masood Afzal; and the Nomination Committee, chaired by Mr. Muhammad Zahid. During FY25, four Board of Directors meetings were held, along with two Audit Committee meetings and one HR & Remuneration Committee meeting. The attendance of all members remained strong, reflecting the members active engagement and commitment to effective governance. The minutes of BOD meetings have been formally documented.


Financial Transparency

RSM Avais Hyder Liaquat Nauman & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the external auditors of the Company, placed in category "A" by the SBP's panel of auditors. The auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. ZTML has an in-house internal audit department consisting of two members who report directly to the CEO, with monthly and quarterly reporting.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's lean organizational structure accelerates the decision-making process and reduces execution time. The CFO, along with the heads of production and marketing, reports directly to the CEO. The HR and IT departments report to the CFO.


Management Team

The CEO, Mr. Muhammad Zahid, holds a graduate degree and has 35 years of experience in the textile sector. He is actively involved in the company's day-to-day operations. The CFO, Mr. Shahab Ud Din is supported by a team of highly qualified and seasoned professionals.


Effectiveness

There are no formal management committees in place, and all unit heads report to the CEO daily to discuss day-to-day business developments and operational issues. This reflects an adequate delegation of authority matrix.


MIS

The Company deployed an Oracle-based ERP solution, Oracle EBS, in 2012, which provides an integrated and automated approach to managing business processes. This allows the Company to streamline and consolidate the flow of information from dispersed operations, enabling proactive management, the avoidance of disruptions, and timely decision-making.


Control Environment

Through MIS, the Company is also able to monitor working capital management and exposure to related parties with automated limits and periodic reviews. The Company holds Oeko-Tex certification, which certifies that its end products and all their components are non-hazardous.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During MY25, approximately 24.4 million MT of cotton was produced globally, compared to about 24.2 million MT in MY24. Throughout the year, low cotton production was observed in India and Pakistan. However, this was partly offset by increases in cotton production in China, the United States, and Brazil by roughly 9.7%, 19.4%, and 15.7%, respectively. China remains the largest producer and consumer of cotton worldwide (MY21-25). Pakistan's cotton output declined by approximately 30.7%, due to reduced cultivation area and a surge in duty-free imports of cotton and yarn, which disrupted domestic markets. Conversely, cotton imports increased by around 234.0% YoY during the same period to satisfy domestic demand (FY24: roughly 70.0% YoY decline). Cotton arrivals for FY24-25 totaled about 5.5 million bales. The target for cotton production in FY26 is set at approximately 10.2 million bales. The sector's rising dependence on imported cotton poses a supply-side risk. For FY25, imports accounted for approximately 35% of the cotton supply (~11% in FY24), adding about USD 1.27 billion (USD 448 million in FY24) to the country's import bill. Textile exports reached USD 17.9 billion in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7 billion the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14 billion, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8 billion and the spinning segment at USD 0.7 billion. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1 million square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% YoY), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (compared to approximately 7.8% in FY24). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, international cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases. Considering the current climate change, flooding in major cotton regions, and shifting crop patterns, the target of approximately 10.2 million bales for FY26 appears challenging.


Relative Position

With a total production capacity of 150,084 spindles, 262 looms, the Company falls in the mid-tier of the respective universe.


Revenues

The Company's revenue stream is predominantly driven by domestic sales. The Company's topline experienced a progression with a 3-year CAGR of 13.4% from 2023 to 2025. This was driven by a steady volumetric growth, translating into continuous revenue expansion. In FY25, the Company's topline reached PKR 40.6bln (FY24: PKR 37.7bln), indicating a 7.6% year-on-year growth. This resulted from the continuous increase in the sales volume of yarn along with adequate product pricing. Product-wise analysis indicates that yarn contributed approximately 84.5% to the Company’s top line, followed by made-ups and other products. The Company exports to North America, South America, Europe, and Africa, reflecting a low geographic concentration risk. The local customers include Style Textile Mills Limited, Nishat Mills Limited, Sapphire Fibres Limited and a few others. Although the top 10 clients in the local market account for a slightly elevated share of revenues, however, the long-standing relationships with prominent industry players provides comfort.


Margins

The Company's gross profit margin reflected an improvement at 6.6% (FY24: 4.9%). This is mainly due to the procurement of cotton at reasonable price along with adequate product pricing. The operating expenses increased further in line with the inflationary trends. The Company earned a healthy revenue from the money market investments and monetary easing. Interest income from TDRs provided a cushion to the profitability matrix. Resultantly, the Company's bottom line exhibited a sizeable improvement at PKR 1.4bln (FY24: PKR 635mln), with the net profit margin of 3.7% (FY24: 1.7%).


Sustainability

The Company has already achieved its targeted production capacity through phased expansion during the previous years. Further, the Company is investing in solar project as a renewable energy alternative.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital requirements are primarily influenced by its inventory cycle and trade receivable cycles, which are financed through a combination of internally generated cash flows and short-term borrowings. As of FY25, the Company’s net working capital cycle remained stable at 68 days (FY24: 67 days), despite elongated inventory holding period of 49 days (FY24: 40 days). The Company retains sufficient borrowing capacity, as reflected in a short-term trade leverage ratio of 36.6% (FY24: 45.7%). Furthermore, it continues to demonstrate a strong liquidity position, with a current ratio of 3.9x (FY24: 3.6x).


Coverages

The Company’s operational performance improved on the back of a significant increase in EBITDA. Consequently, the free cash flow from operations (FCFO) increased to PKR 3.1bln (FY24: PKR 1.9bln). This improvement translated into stronger interest coverage and core operating coverage ratios, which stood at 3.4x (FY24: 1.6x) and 1.5x (FY24: 0.8x), respectively. The rise in FCFO, combined with a decline in finance costs, contributed to a substantial reduction in the debt payback period, which improved to 1.7 years (FY24: 11.2 years).


Capitalization

The Company’s debt portfolio consists of a combination of conventional borrowings and concessionary financing schemes extended by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP). In FY25, the Company’s total leverage declined to 29.7% (FY24: 34.5%), reflecting a moderately leveraged capital structure. The Company’s equity base further strengthened to PKR 20.8bln (FY24: PKR 16.0bln), supported by the retention of earnings from prior years.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 19,179 15,650 13,629
2. Investments 225 160 101
3. Related Party Exposure 0 1 6
4. Current Assets 17,557 13,530 13,088
a. Inventories 6,906 3,986 4,388
b. Trade Receivables 3,870 3,798 3,765
5. Total Assets 36,962 29,341 26,823
6. Current Liabilities 4,506 3,748 2,852
a. Trade Payables 2,158 1,356 776
7. Borrowings 8,670 8,189 6,885
8. Related Party Exposure 146 260 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2,775 1,131 1,324
10. Net Assets 20,866 16,012 15,762
11. Shareholders' Equity 20,866 16,012 15,762
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 40,608 37,742 32,317
a. Cost of Good Sold (37,935) (35,909) (29,706)
2. Gross Profit 2,673 1,833 2,611
a. Operating Expenses (579) (619) (749)
3. Operating Profit 2,094 1,214 1,862
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 618 1,101 551
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 2,712 2,315 2,413
a. Total Finance Cost (1,072) (1,485) (816)
b. Taxation (145) (195) (384)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,495 635 1,213
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,132 1,935 2,853
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 2,000 604 2,012
c. Changes in Working Capital (2,942) 758 639
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (943) 1,362 2,652
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 508 (2,068) 102
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 367 1,162 (1,844)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (68) 457 909
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 7.6% 16.8% 15.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 6.6% 4.9% 8.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 3.7% 1.7% 3.8%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 0.5% 7.1% 10.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 8.1% 4.0% 8.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 83 77 94
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 68 67 86
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.9 3.6 4.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.4 1.6 4.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.5 0.8 2.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.7 11.2 1.9
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 29.7% 34.5% 30.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 65.5 63.2 45.1
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.5% 16.4% 9.4%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com