Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Oct-25 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
11-Oct-24 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
12-Oct-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
12-Oct-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
13-Oct-21 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

HCS was established in 2009 and stands tall in the construction industry of Pakistan as the pioneer of "Fast Track" project execution culture. Significant construction projects to its credit are Lahore Ring Road, 2X2.5 MW hydel power project at Chashma, 17-storey Bahria Grand hotel, Benazir Bhutto international airport civil works, Beijing underpass Lahore, Kalma Chowk underpass & overhead bridge, Metro Bus projects in Islamabad, Lahore and Faisalabad, etc. The CEO, Mr. Shahid Saleem, is considered the visionary leader behind the success of the Company. The overall control of the Company vests in three-member board of directors (BoD), all of whom have executive roles and there is no independent director.

Rating Rationale

Habib Construction Services Limited (“HCS” or “the Company”) has established a strong presence and brand reputation in the construction industry through decades of successful operations, with a proven track record of successfully completing numerous public and private sector projects. HCS primarily undertakes large-scale infrastructure works in collaboration with joint venture partners, including Chinese, Japanese, and local contractors. More recently, the Company has diversified its focus toward multilateral-funded and smaller-scale projects. Operating on a tender-based income model, HCS’s revenue depends on its ability to secure new contracts. The Company’s financial position remains closely linked to efficient project execution and timely completion. As per industry practice, HCS relies significantly on non-funded banking lines and supplier credit for its operations, while maintaining minimal funded obligations. The Company possesses a sound equity base, particularly in relation to its non-funded exposures. During FY25, HCS secured a substantial number of new projects—some completed and others in progress—which are expected to generate revenues over the coming years. As of 1HFY25, the topline stood at PKR 7,047mln (FY24: PKR 17,933mln; FY23: PKR 5,562mln). Profitability improved, with gross margins rising to 14% in 1HFY25 (FY24: 12.3%; FY23: 7%), and net margins increasing to 5.1% (FY24: 0.8%; FY23: -8.7%). The assigned positive outlook reflects improved financial performance and a sound project pipeline; however, the timely completion of audited financials and maintenance of key financial metrics remain important considerations for a potential rating upgrade. Regarding ongoing claims and disputes associated with the Lahore Orange Line Metro Train Project (Package-1), the Company remains optimistic about a favorable resolution, which could strengthen liquidity.

Key Rating Drivers

Expansion of HCS’s business is expected to strengthen its risk profile. However, the Company’s ratings remain sensitive to the cyclical nature of the construction sector and overall economic volatility. Timely project execution, resolution of pending claims—particularly those related to the Orange Line Metro—and efficient revenue collection will be critical for maintaining liquidity and financial stability. Any significant delays or disruptions in major projects, especially those associated with Bahria Town, could pose risks to the Company’s ratings. Improvement in governance practices also remains a key consideration.

Profile
Legal Structure

Habib Construction Services Limited (‘‘the Company’’ or ‘‘HCS’’) was incorporated in 2009 and subsequently converted into a Public Limited (Unlisted) Company on July 15, 2016. The registered office of the Company is located at 15-A, G-1, Johar Town, near Doctor’s Hospital, Lahore.


Background

HCS was incorporated in 2009 by a group of experienced industry professionals. Within six months, the company achieved the prestigious C-A (No Limit) license from the Pakistan Engineering Council, establishing its eligibility to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects. Since inception, HCS has built a strong reputation for timely project execution, cost efficiency, and dependable partnerships with both clients and vendors. The company’s portfolio spans motorways, expressways, highways, airports, bridges, and underpasses, reflecting its capability to manage diverse and technically demanding projects. At the helm of HCS is Mr. Shahid Saleem, its co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, who brings over three decades of experience in Pakistan’s construction sector. Under his leadership, the company has expanded significantly, delivering landmark projects that have reinforced its position as a trusted and leading infrastructure developer in Pakistan.


Operations

The Company undertakes diverse infrastructure development works across Pakistan, with an operational focus on highways, bridges, underpasses, flyovers, airports, and other civil engineering projects. Notable projects completed by the Company include the Lahore Ring Road, 2x2.5 MW Hydel Power Project at Chashma, Bahria Grand Hotel, civil works for Benazir Bhutto International Airport, Beijing Underpass in Lahore, Kalma Chowk Underpass and Flyover, Cavalry Ground Underpass, and the Metro Bus projects in Islamabad, Lahore, and Multan. These projects highlight HCS’s ability to execute large and technically demanding assignments, strengthening its position in Pakistan’s construction industry.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

HCS is owned by 31 shareholders. A majority stake of around 52% is held by the two directors, Mr. Shahid Saleem and Mr. M. Shabbir, while the remaining shares have been distributed among members of the management. This structure was designed to extend ownership to employees, fostering a sense of commitment and belonging across the organization.


Stability

HCS has maintained a stable ownership structure since inception, with majority control vested in Mr. Shahid Saleem and consistent leadership provided by the directors. The distribution of shares among management further aligns employee interests with the Company’s long-term success, reinforcing stability and reducing the likelihood of abrupt changes in governance.


Business Acumen

HCS benefits from the long-standing association of its shareholders and directors, each bringing extensive knowledge of the construction industry. Their collective experience, supported by an employee-shareholding structure, ensures continuity in leadership, informed decision-making, and a deep understanding of industry dynamics, which underpin the Company’s sustained growth and stability.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of HCS possess adequate financial strength, with their ownership stake concentrated solely in the construction business. This focused exposure reduces the risk of financial diversion and ensures alignment with the Company’s long-term performance. Their support has been evident through personal guarantees in the past, while HCS’s equity participation in Malir Expressway Limited and Shajar Roads Limited reflects the sponsors’ capacity to engage in large-scale infrastructure projects.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company is overseen by a three-member Board of Directors, all of whom hold executive roles. This structure ensures continuity in leadership and alignment with management. However, there remains room for improvement in governance practices, particularly through the potential inclusion of independent directors to strengthen oversight and broaden strategic perspective.


Members’ Profile

The Board comprises qualified professionals with extensive experience in the construction industry. Mr. Saleem Shahid, Chief Executive Officer, brings over three decades of industry expertise. He is supported by Mr. Mohammad Shabir, an actuary by profession responsible for operational oversight, and Mr. Mohsin, a Fellow Chartered Accountant with more than 20 years of experience in financial management. Collectively, the Board’s diverse expertise provides strategic direction and supports the sustainable growth of the Company.


Board Effectiveness

HCS has constituted two Board Committees – the Audit Committee and the Human Resource & Remuneration Committee – to ensure effective oversight of management policies and the Company’s operations. While attendance at Board and Committee meetings has been recorded, the documentation f formal minutes and independent oversight mechanisms present areas for further strengthening.


Financial Transparency

Malik Haroon Shahid Safder & Co., Chartered Accountants, the external auditors of the Company, have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2024. The audit of FY25 is currently in progress.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a detailed organizational structure with operations segregated into six departments: (i) Engineering, (ii) Information Technology, (iii) Contract Management, (iv) Surveyor, (v) Construction Management, and (vi) Finance. Clear lines of responsibility are defined for each department, ensuring effective functional oversight and accountability.


Management Team

Mr. Shahid Saleem, Chief Executive Officer and one of the founding members of HCS, has over 31 years of diversified experience with leading private sector construction companies and provides strategic leadership to the organization. Supporting him, the senior management team comprises three Project Managers, each with more than 25 years of experience in the construction sector, including over a decade with HCS. They report directly to the CEO and are assisted by a technical team primarily consisting of planning engineers and site in-charges.


Effectiveness

The Company does not have formal management committees in place; however, senior management convenes meetings on a need basis for discussions and decision-making. In addition, management regularly reviews MIS-based reports, which support informed and timely decisions.


MIS

HCS utilizes ERP software, customized for the construction industry by BE-Tech, to manage its operations. The system facilitates monitoring of receivables, payables, general ledger, accounts, and related functions.


Control Environment

The Company has internal control systems and procedures in place to support operational efficiency and reliability of reporting. Oversight is further reinforced by the dual role of employees as shareholders, which enhances accountability and alignment of interests with the Company’s long-term objectives.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) for FY24 experienced a year-on-year (YoY) increase of approximately 30.7%, reaching PKR 950 billion. A specic allocation has been made for the Construction and Transport sectors under both Current and Development Expenditure on the Revenue Account. The total allocation for these sectors stands at PKR 40.5 billion for Current Expenditure and PKR 39.1 billion for Development Expenditure. Compared to the previous scal year (SPLY), these allocations have seen slight adjustments, with the gures for Construction and Transport last year being PKR 30.2 billion and PKR 55.2 billion, respectively. In addition to infrastructure projects, there is a growing demand for hydel-based power plants aimed at improving the energy mix, with funding being provided by multilateral agencies.


Relative Position

HCS, a public unlisted company, ranks among the leading infrastructure developers in Pakistan. The Company is one of only ~156 firms (1.6% of over 10,000 registered with PEC) holding the prestigious “CA” category license, enabling participation in large-scale projects. While the sector is generally less formalized, HCS has adopted a corporate structure with employee-shareholders, though the Board remains predominantly sponsor-led. With experienced leadership and technical depth, HCS competes with major players such as FWO, Descon Engineering, and Habib Rafiq (Pvt) Limited, maintaining a strong reputation for timely and quality project execution.


Revenues

HCS’s revenue is project-driven, generated through contracts executed independently as well as through joint ventures, primarily in the road and building sectors. The continuity of revenue is closely linked to the availability and execution of infrastructure projects in the country. As of FY25, the Company has approximately 16 ongoing projects with a total value of PKR 84bln, including its share in joint ventures, of which the Company’s direct share is around PKR 55bln. Work on approx. PKR 15bln worth of projects has been halted or is progressing slowly due to contractor-related issues. During FY25, projects worth nearly PKR 25bln were successfully completed, while around PKR 30bln is expected to be realized in the upcoming period from ongoing projects. In addition, bidding for new projects is actively underway, and the prospective pipeline is considered healthy, providing visibility for medium-term revenue generation. For FY24, the Company recorded revenue of approximately PKR 17bln. Revenue growth and continuity are influenced by macroeconomic conditions, including inflation and interest rates, which have historically impacted construction activity and project execution. With the recent easing of the policy rate, sector activity is expected to revive, likely translating into increased project mobilization in the coming periods.


Margins

The construction industry remains highly fragmented, with numerous players offering comparable services. Despite a challenging economic environment and intense competition, HCS reported an improvement in profitability. Gross margins rose to 14.3% in 1HFY25 (1HFY24: 13.4%; FY24: 12.3%), while PBIT margins increased to 13.2% (1HFY24: 11.8%; FY24: 9.5%). Net profit margins also recovered to 5.1%, compared to 3.3% in 1HFY24 and 0.8% in FY24. The margin gains reflect the Company’s ability to sustain profitability through improved cost management, operational efficiencies, and a better selection of medium- to short-tenure projects that provide quicker turnaround and cash flow visibility.


Sustainability

Besides its core construction business, which benefits from a healthy project pipeline supporting revenue and financial sustainability, HCS holds strategic equity investments in unlisted public companies, providing additional income streams and diversification. The Company has a 7.02% equity stake in Shajar Roads Limited and a 6% stake in Malir Expressway Limited, both held for strategic purposes. These holdings complement the Company’s core operations, enhancing medium-term revenue visibility and supporting financial stability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

HCS manages its working capital primarily through customer receipts, supplemented by a small portion of short-term borrowings. The Company also maintains substantial exposure to non-funded facilities, such as performance guarantees, which are critical for project execution. During 1HFY25, receivables increased to PKR 2,904mln (FY24: 1,773mln), resulting in gross working capital days of 72 (FY24: 45 days). Payables rose to PKR 3,136mln (FY24: 2,276mln), which offset the higher receivables and reduced net working capital days to 2 (FY24: 5 days). Short-term borrowings increased modestly to PKR 179mln from PKR 133mln in FY24.


Coverages

During 1HFY25, the Company's Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) saw a slight increase, reaching PKR 569mln compared to PKR 532mln in SPLY (FY24: PKR 673mln). Due to improved earnings and cash flows, coverage ratios also improved during the current period. The coverage ratio, calculated as FCFO to Finance Cost, stood at 38.7x, up from 34.1x in 1HFY24 (FY24: 21.7x).


Capitalization

The Company’s leverage stood at 5% in 1HFY25, in line with previous practice (FY24: 4.8%). Consistent with industry norms, HCS maintains low leverage, with most exposures in the form of unfunded lines such as Letters of Guarantee. Short-term borrowings are occasionally utilized to manage liquidity pressures but remain modest relative to the equity base of PKR 6,197mln. The funding profile is predominantly short-term, with short-term borrowings accounting for 97.8% of total borrowings in 1HFY25 (FY24: 97%).


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Dec-24
6M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 4,013 4,111 4,262 3,336
2. Investments 1,146 949 730 607
3. Related Party Exposure 203 192 133 117
4. Current Assets 6,820 6,213 5,501 6,154
a. Inventories 426 494 433 389
b. Trade Receivables 2,904 1,773 1,716 2,297
5. Total Assets 12,182 11,465 10,626 10,213
6. Current Liabilities 5,349 5,028 3,993 3,954
a. Trade Payables 3,136 2,276 1,678 1,746
7. Borrowings 183 137 231 340
8. Related Party Exposure 144 159 529 600
9. Non-Current Liabilities 309 304 261 180
10. Net Assets 6,197 5,837 5,612 5,139
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,197 5,837 5,612 5,139
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,047 17,933 5,562 5,557
a. Cost of Good Sold (6,038) (15,735) (5,173) (4,762)
2. Gross Profit 1,008 2,198 390 795
a. Operating Expenses (81) (363) (492) (393)
3. Operating Profit 927 1,834 (102) 402
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 6 (138) 24 19
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 933 1,696 (78) 422
a. Total Finance Cost (44) (110) (91) (101)
b. Taxation (528) (1,437) (317) (105)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 360 149 (486) 216
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 569 673 (48) 464
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 525 564 (135) 364
c. Changes in Working Capital (411) (259) 528 (113)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 115 305 394 250
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (163) (178) (225) (321)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (2) (4) (4) (3)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (50) 123 165 (74)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -21.4% 222.4% 0.1% 83.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.3% 12.3% 7.0% 14.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 5.1% 0.8% -8.7% 3.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 2.2% 2.3% 8.6% 6.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.0% 2.6% -9.0% 4.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 72 45 159 230
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 2 5 46 130
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 70.2 66.0 7.9 8.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 35.2 20.3 -1.1 4.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.1 0.3 -6.0 1.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 5.0% 4.8% 11.9% 15.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 89.7 84.3 73.4 23.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 6.2% 5.0% 6.5% 19.4%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com