Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
06-Nov-25 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
08-Nov-24 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
10-Nov-23 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
10-Nov-22 AA- A1 Stable Upgrade -
30-Sep-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Liberty Power Tech Limited was incorporated in September 2007 as an Independent Power Producer (IPP) under the Power Policy 2002. The Company is majority-owned by the Liberty Group, comprising the Mukaty Family (61%) and Liberty Mills Limited (29%), while Soorty Enterprises holds the remaining 10% shareholding. The Board of Directors consists of eight members, all representing the Liberty Group, which is primarily engaged in the textile sector. The Board is chaired by Mr. Ashraf Saleem Mukaty. The management team comprises qualified professionals with diverse experience across multiple sectors and is led by the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Azam Sakrani.

Rating Rationale

Liberty Power Tech Limited (“the Company”) operates a 200 MW Residual Fuel Oil (RFO)-based power plant. The Company entered into a 25-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with CPPA-G on a Take or Pay basis, effective from the COD in January 2011. However, under the recent power sector reforms, the Company has executed an amendment to the PPA, as proposed by the government’s task force, to convert the existing tariff structure into a Hybrid Take and Pay model. Under the revised arrangement, the capacity tariff has been reduced, along with certain indexation-related adjustments to other tariff components. In line with the agreement, the power purchaser has cleared the outstanding receivables of the Company as of November 2024, resulting in a significant reduction in receivables during FY25. Additionally, the Company has agreed to waive the outstanding delayed payment interest charged to CPPA-G up to October 31, 2024. Consequently, the Company’s topline declined compared to FY24, and reported a net loss during the period due to a one-time adjustment related to prior periods. Had there been no one-time adjustment, the Company’s profit would have been sizeable. During FY25, dispatch levels also decline relative to the previous year, with the plant operating at a capacity factor of 4.53%, generating 77,784 MWh versus 239,938 MWh (14% capacity factor) in FY24. The reduction in generation primarily reflects a shift in demand toward cheaper energy sources, such as hydro, local coal, solar, wind, and biogas, under the power purchaser’s cost-optimization strategy. Despite lower utilization, the Company continues to meet its availability and efficiency benchmarks, supported by a technically proficient O&M team, and has remained profitable in its power generation segment, if the one-time adjustment relating to prior year is excluded. The Company is managing its working capital requirements through a mix of internally generated cash flows and bank borrowings; however, in line with reduced demand, utilization levels remain minimal. The Company maintains a debt-free balance sheet, having fully repaid its project-related obligations earlier. In addition, it has developed a robust investment portfolio, generating steady income that supports profitability and helps cushion the impact of the revised tariff. This strong financial positioning enhances the Company’s flexibility and underscores its prudent capital management.

Key Rating Drivers

The assigned ratings are underpinned by the Company’s strengthened financial profile following the full repayment of its project-related debt, which has significantly enhanced its credit quality. The Company continues to demonstrate sound financial discipline; however, sustaining plant availability and operational performance in line with agreed benchmarks remains essential to maintaining the ratings. Despite sector-wide challenges, strong sponsor backing and a diversified investment portfolio provide solid liquidity support, ensuring continued financial stability and resilience.

Profile
Plant

Liberty Power Tech Limited ('Liberty Power' or the 'Company') operates a 200MW power plant based on Residual Fuel Oil (RFO) near Faisalabad. The plant configuration comprises eleven Residual Fuel oil-fired diesel generators having a capacity of 16.5MW each, along with a steam turbine. Net rated capacity, after accounting for auxiliary consumption, is ~196MW. The plant sells electricity to CPPA-G, the power purchaser.


Tariff

The Company now operates under a “Hybrid Take-and-Pay” tariff structure, following the revision from the previous “Take-or-Pay” arrangement. The reference generation tariff includes a capacity charge component and a dispatch-based energy charge component. The levelized tariff over a 25-year period is PKR 7.87/kWh. For the July-September period, the capacity charge stood at PKR 1.9778/kWh, while the energy charge was PKR 43.1515/kWh.


Return on Project

Pursuant to the Master Agreement signed on February 11, 2021, the Company agreed to discounts in tariff components, specifically in the Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Equity During Construction (ROEDC). This results in a return of 17% per annum in PKR, calculated at an exchange rate of PKR 148/USD, with no future USD indexation, instead of the previous USD-indexed return of 15%


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Liberty Power Tech Limited is primarily owned by the Liberty Group, with Mukaty Family holding 61% and Liberty Mills Limited holding 29% shareholding, while the remaining 10% stake is held by Soorty Enterprises.


Stability

The ownership structure of the Company has remained stable over the years, with no major changes anticipated in the foreseeable future. The sponsors maintain a strong presence in the energy sector through various ventures, including wind-based renewable power projects, and continue to explore opportunities for portfolio expansion. This sustained commitment reflects the sponsors’ long-term strategic interest in the Company, indicating a low likelihood of any stake dilution going forward.


Business Acumen

Liberty Mills Limited incorporated in February 1965, is in the business of manufacturing and processing all kinds of textile fabrics and made-ups. Liberty Group has gradually diversified within the power sector. The sponsors possess relevant experience and have a proven track record of successfully delivering projects from initial concept to operational success.


Financial Strength

The sponsors possess strong financial strength, backed by a well-diversified and profitable business portfolio across multiple sectors. Their robust financial standing enhances the Company’s credit profile, as they have demonstrated the capacity and willingness to provide support both during normal operations and in periods of financial stress.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) comprises eight members, including the Chief Executive Officer. All board members represent the Liberty Group, ensuring strategic alignment and effective oversight consistent with the Group’s long-term vision.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Ashraf Saleem Mukaty serves as the Acting Chairman of the Board and has held multiple leadership roles within the Liberty Group. He also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Mills Limited. The remaining board members are seasoned professionals with extensive experience and a longstanding association with the Company, contributing to effective governance and strategic direction.


Board Effectiveness

The Board has constituted an Audit Committee comprising three members responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting, internal controls, and operational performance. Regular board meetings are held to deliberate on key matters, including plant efficiency, financial performance, and budgetary reviews. The Board remains actively engaged in providing strategic oversight and guidance, ensuring sound governance and effective decision-making within the Company.


Financial Transparency

Yousaf Adil Chartered Accountants (SBP category 'A') is the external auditor of the Company. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ending June 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company maintains a well-defined organizational structure, ensuring clear lines of authority and accountability. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Resident Director of the plant report directly to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who in turn reports to the Board of Directors. The core management team comprises seven qualified professionals with extensive experience in the energy sector, enabling efficient decision-making and smooth operational management.


Management Team

Mr. Azam Sakrani serves as the CEO and brings over two decades of diversified experience in banking, finance, and industrial operations. Mr. Kashif Hanif, a fellow member of the Institute of Cost and Management Accountants of Pakistan (ICMAP), has been serving as the CFO since September 2019. The management team consists of qualified and experienced professionals with expertise across finance, operations, and technical domains, ensuring effective management and operational efficiency within the Company.


Effectiveness

The management operates under the close supervision of the Board, which actively monitors the plant’s overall performance and ensures operational effectiveness through periodic evaluations. The Board provides strategic guidance and support in key decision-making areas, facilitating smooth operations and the achievement of organizational objectives.


Control Environment

Liberty Power maintains a well-established control environment, supported by a robust IT infrastructure. The quality, breadth, and depth of its systems and processes remain satisfactory, ensuring effective internal controls, reliable reporting, and operational efficiency.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

Liberty Power’s revenues are derived from the sale of electricity to CPPA-G under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement (PPA), valid until March 2036. Following recent amendments, the Company now operates under a Hybrid Take-and-Pay model. The arrangement continues to ensure capacity payments subject to required plant availability, providing stability to the revenue stream.


Operation and Maintenance

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) activities are outsourced to Wärtsilä Pakistan under a long-term agreement. The contract was renewed for a third term in July 2021 for a period of six years, expiring in 2027. Wärtsilä, being a highly experienced O&M operator, ensures the plant’s efficient performance, reliability, and adherence to technical and safety standards.


Resource Risk

The Company procures Residual Fuel Oil (RFO) from multiple local Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs), including Attock Petroleum, Byco Petroleum, and Pakistan State Oil. While the fuel supply risk remains with the Company, it is effectively mitigated through diversification of suppliers and prudent inventory management practices, ensuring operational continuity.


Insurance Cover

The Company has adequate insurance coverage for property damage and business interruption.


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

In FY25, Pakistan’s power sector generated approximately 127,160 GWh against an installed capacity of 45,888 MW, remaining broadly unchanged from the previous year and 6% below the reference target. Hydropower dominated the energy mix with about 31%, followed by nuclear at 18%, RLNG at 17%, local coal at 12%, imported coal at 7%, gas at 9%, and solar at 1% (rising to 5% when net-metered capacity is included). Local coal-based generation was recorded at nearly 15,547 GWh, while imported coal surged to 9,066 GWh, an 80% year-on-year increase, driven by more competitive dispatch. Net-metered solar capacity grew sharply to around 2,800 MW, reflecting a shift toward self-generation, while wind maintained a modest 3% share, constrained by curtailments and grid limitations. Demand projections for FY26, under both normal and high scenarios, indicate growth of 2.8% to 5%.

In FY25, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) continued its focus on tariff rationalization and structural reforms in the power sector. A Task Force was established to implement these changes, including the adoption of “Hybrid Take-and-Pay” tariff structures. Under this initiative, IPPs operating under the 2002 policy agreed to reduce tariffs in line with the Task Force’s terms. The government is now focusing on developing an energy market and is drafting a framework to implement the Competitive Capacity-Based Tariff Mechanism (CCBTM), aimed at improving efficiency and competitiveness in the power sector.


Generation

During FY25, Liberty Power generated 77 GWh of electricity (FY24: 239 GWh), reflecting a significant decline in generation. The reduction primarily stemmed from a shift in electricity demand toward more cost-effective energy sources such as hydro, solar, wind, and biogas, which have gained preference in the national energy mix.

The Company’s topline declined to PKR 6,935 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 16,010 million), primarily due to the revision in tariff terms. During the year, a Task Force constituted by the Prime Minister of Pakistan initiated amendments to the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and Implementation Agreement (IA), leading the Company to adopt a “Hybrid Take-and-Pay” tariff model. Consequently, Liberty Power reported a loss of PKR 652 million in FY25, compared to a profit of PKR 7,586 million in FY24, mainly due to a one-time adjustment of late payment surcharge receivables written off under the revised agreement—pertaining to prior periods. Despite the tariff revision, the Company continues to maintain a sizeable short-term investment portfolio, the returns from which are expected to provide steady support to profitability going forward.


Performance Benchmark

During the period, the plant operated at an average load factor of only 4.5% (June 2024; 14%). The decrease in load factor is attributed to the lower generation due to the revision of tariff to a hybrid structure and the increasing reliance of the Power Purchaser on captive power plants and cheaper sources of electricity. 


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

The project was initially financed through a capital structure comprising 75% debt (approximately USD 180 million) and 25% equity (approximately USD 60 million). The project-related debt, amounting to PKR 15,137 million — including a senior Islamic facility of PKR 13,488 million and a long-term finance facility of PKR 1,649 million — was fully repaid by December 2020, rendering the Company debt-free.


Liquidity Profile

As of June 2025, Liberty Power’s liquidity position strengthened following the receipt of long-outstanding payments from CPPA-G. Trade receivables declined sharply to around PKR 2,362 million (Jun-24: PKR 12,247 million), easing pressure on working capital. The Company maintained a strong liquidity buffer, with short-term investments increasing substantially to PKR 25,095 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 10,767 million), reflecting effective cash flow management and a conservative investment approach. Additionally, sponsor support in the form of a PKR 6 billion loan further reinforced the liquidity profile. Despite sector-wide liquidity challenges, Liberty Power’s financial flexibility remains adequate, backed by a solid investment base and timely sponsor support.


Working Capital Financing

As of June 2025, the Company’s net cash cycle extended to 403 days (Jun-24: 346 days), primarily due to higher inventory and receivable days, reflecting delayed payments from the power purchaser. Average receivable days stood at 384 (Jun-24: 327), while payable days increased slightly to 16 (Jun-24: 4). To support its working capital requirements, the Company availed short-term borrowings of PKR 5,887 million (Jun-24: PKR 97 million), with additional unutilized limits of PKR 5.4 billion available. The increase in short-term debt reflects the need to bridge temporary liquidity gaps arising from delayed receipts and lower generation levels during the year.


Cash Flow Analysis

During FY25, Liberty Power’s cash flow generation weakened compared to the previous year due to lower dispatch levels and reduced profitability. Free cash flows from operations (FCFO) declined to PKR 1,494 million (FY24: PKR 4,978 million), primarily reflecting lower generation and a one-time adjustment with CPPA-G. Consequently, coverage ratios also deteriorated, with interest coverage reducing to 3.3x (FY24: 9.3x) and debt coverage (FCFO / Finance Cost + CMLTB) declining to 1.8x (FY24: 7.8x). Despite these pressures, liquidity support from sponsors and substantial investment holdings provided a cushion to the Company’s overall cash flow position.


Capitalization

Following the full repayment of long-term project debt, Liberty Power’s capital structure remains sound; however, leveraging increased to 31.7% in FY25 (Jun-24: 0.3%) due to the utilization of additional short-term borrowings to support liquidity and operational needs. Despite this rise, the Company maintains a strong equity base and adequate financial flexibility, reinforced by sizable short-term investments and continued sponsor support, which collectively sustain a healthy capitalization profile.


 
 

Nov-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 8,585 9,170 9,443
2. Investments 25,095 10,767 8,869
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 8,672 18,061 22,418
a. Inventories 416 899 1,137
b. Trade Receivables 2,362 12,248 16,401
5. Total Assets 42,352 37,997 40,730
6. Current Liabilities 1,977 2,367 2,012
a. Trade Payables 411 209 160
7. Borrowings 5,944 107 10,082
8. Related Party Exposure 6,617 0 1,089
9. Non-Current Liabilities 745 485 96
10. Net Assets 27,069 35,038 27,452
11. Shareholders' Equity 27,069 35,038 27,452
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,935 16,011 22,178
a. Cost of Good Sold (4,375) (10,277) (17,689)
2. Gross Profit 2,560 5,734 4,489
a. Operating Expenses (692) (448) (247)
3. Operating Profit 1,868 5,286 4,242
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (205) 4,155 (31)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,664 9,441 4,211
a. Total Finance Cost (817) (632) (795)
b. Taxation (1,499) (1,224) (50)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (652) 7,585 3,367
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,494 4,978 4,906
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 704 3,818 4,679
c. Changes in Working Capital 1,919 6,176 (7,715)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,623 9,994 (3,037)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (8,449) 2,031 1,465
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (718) (1,099) (1,279)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (6,544) 10,925 (2,851)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -56.7% -27.8% -20.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 36.9% 35.8% 20.2%
c. Net Profit Margin -9.4% 47.4% 15.2%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 49.2% 69.7% -12.7%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -2.5% 20.9% 13.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 419 350 244
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 403 346 238
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.4 7.6 11.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.3 9.3 6.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.8 7.8 6.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 9.8 0.0 0.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 31.7% 0.3% 28.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 25.3 17.9 260.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.9% 11.2% 9.4%

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-25

www.pacra.com