Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
13-Nov-25 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
13-Nov-24 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
13-Nov-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Nov-22 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
23-Nov-21 A+ A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Sapphire Fibres Limited - listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange - commenced operations in 1979. The Company’s capacity is maintained at ~104,256 spindles and ~164 looms, respectively. It is the flagship company of the Sapphire group. The Overall control vests with a nine-member Board, dominated by the sponsoring family, while three members are independent directors. The Board is chaired by Mr. Yousuf Abdullah. The CEO, Mr. Shahid Abdullah oversees the Company’s operations. He is supported by a team of highly qualified and experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of Sapphire Fibres Limited (“SFL” or “the Company”) reflect the established profile of its sponsoring group, the Sapphire Group, a distinguished conglomerate in Pakistan. The group has considerable business diversity in multiple industry segments, including textile, power generation, dairy and retail. SFL is considered one of the group's leading ventures in the competitive textile landscape. The Company operates as a vertically integrated unit, utilizing advanced production technologies to deliver high-quality products across its spinning, denim fabrics, knitted fabrics and garments divisions. Over time, SFL has expanded its income streams beyond the textile business to manage concentration risk, entering the power sector through core strategic investments and scaling its equity investment book. As part of its business diversification strategy to enhance its presence in the power sector, SFL acquired a 50% share in UCH Power (Private) Limited and UCH–II Power (Private) Limited.
During FY25, the Company experienced a modest incline in revenue growth, reaching PKR 50.5bln (FY24: PKR 47.4bln, 1QFY26: PKR 11.6bln,), driven by business volumes. The Company’s revenue composition exhibits a notable shift from a predominantly export-oriented sales base to a more balanced mix. Local sales clocked in at PKR 29.8bln, surpassing export sales of PKR 25.1bln. This strategic shift reflects the Company’s strategic focus on strengthening its domestic market presence while maintaining a robust export footprint. Spinning remains the top-performing segment in revenue generation, contributing PKR 27.2bln in the Company’s top line, followed by PKR 13.9bln from denim and PKR 9.3bln from knits. The knitting segment recorded a notable recovery during the year, supported by improved demand dynamics in key export markets and enhanced operational performance. SFL’s clientele consists of established entities across various export destinations worldwide, primarily in Asia and European markets.
The Company’s gross margins continued to face strain during the year, primarily due to sustained procurement of imported raw cotton and elevated input costs. Rising energy and labor expenses, partially offset by monetary easing, persisted as key industry-wide challenges across the textile value chain. Despite margin pressures at the operational level, the overall earnings profile strengthened, reflecting enhanced financial outcomes for the period. The Company reported a substantial improvement in profitability during the year (FY25: PKR 13.7bln, FY24: PKR 3.4bln), primarily driven by related party dividends. The funding matrix of the Company revolves around short-term equity investments, which supplement the liquidity profile and augment the profitability matrix of the Company through the inflow of dividend income. The Company maintains a low-leverage capital structure with a well-managed working capital, supplementing the financial risk profile. Cash flows and coverage metrics are considered adequate, with scope for further improvement.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings depend on a consistent improvement in profitability while venturing into diversified business segments. Ensuring the prudent administration of the investment book continues to hold importance. The sustainability of coverages and stable generation of cash flows from core consolidated operations remain critical for assigned ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sapphire Fibres Limited ("SFL" or "the Company") was incorporated in Pakistan on June 05, 1979, as a Public Company under the Companies Act, 1913 (now the Companies Act, 2017), and its shares are quoted on the PSX.


Background

SFL is the flagship Company of the Sapphire Group. Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah, the group's chairman, founded Sapphire Group in 1969, and the transition from a yarn manufacturer to one of the largest textile conglomerates reflects his vision. The group gradually expanded its footprint into multiple sectors, including power generation, dairy, and retail. Backed by 47 years of industry experience, a workforce of more than 35,000 employees, and a network of over 26 facilities, the Group continues to demonstrate operational excellence, scale, and sustained growth across its business verticals.


Operations

SFL is a vertically integrated textile enterprise engaged in the manufacturing of yarn, denim, knitted fabrics, and garments. The Company’s operations encompass eight production facilities, equipped with 104,256 spindles, 164 looms, 102 knitting machines, and 16 stitching units, enabling end-to-end value addition across its product portfolio. The Company's registered office is located at 316, Cotton Exchange Building, I.I Chundrigar Road, Karachi.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s ownership structure remains closely held, with the sponsoring family maintaining a dominant shareholding of ~90.9%, primarily through group companies (~89.6%) and individual holdings (~1.3%). The balance of ~5.8% is held by the general public, which includes institutional investors such as NIT and ICP collectively holding around ~3.0%. The concentrated ownership profile ensures strong sponsor alignment, effective oversight, and continuity in the Company’s strategic direction.


Stability

The Group’s ownership and leadership have been successfully transitioned to the four sons of the founding chairman, Mr. Mian Mohammad Abdullah — Mr. Shahid Abdullah, Mr. Nadeem Abdullah, Mr. Amer Abdullah, and Mr. Yousaf Abdullah. The second generation remains actively engaged in the strategic and operational management of the Group, ensuring continuity of vision and governance stability. Given the cohesive family shareholding and active involvement of the sponsors, no changes in the ownership structure are anticipated in the foreseeable future.


Business Acumen

The Abdullah family brings nearly five decades of extensive experience in the textile sector. Their in-depth understanding of mill operations, complemented by strong strategic planning and policy formulation capabilities, has established them among the leading and well-recognized business groups within the industry.


Financial Strength

The Company reflects a robust financial profile, underpinned by a sizable consolidated equity base of PKR 90.6 billion as of FY25 and a consolidated revenue stream of PKR 62.4 billion. The strong capitalization provides substantial balance sheet strength and supports the Company’s low-leverage position. At the Group level, the diversified business portfolio and consistent revenue base exceeding USD 1.3 billion collectively reinforce overall financial resilience and stability within a challenging operating environment.


Governance
Board Structure

The board comprises nine members (eight male directors and one female director) including the Chairman and CEO. Five members act as non-executive directors, three independent directors, and one executive director. The inclusion of independent oversight has strengthened the governance matrix of the Company.


Members’ Profile

The chairman of the board, Mr. Yousuf Abdullah, holds an MBA from the UK. He is the CEO of Sapphire Finishing Mills Limited and has also served on the boards of other group businesses since 1995. SFL's CEO, Mr. Shahid Abdullah, holds a bachelor's degree in Commerce and has been associated with the Sapphire Group since 1980. Mr. Nadeem Abdullah, CEO of Sapphire Textile Mills Limited, possesses over 17 years of experience and graduated from McGill University, Canada. Mr. Shayan Abdullah has a Bachelor of Science in Business Management from the USA and has been associated with the board since 2015. Mr. Amer Abdullah has been associated with the group since 1990 and holds an MBA from the USA. He is currently serving as the CEO of Diamond Fabrics Limited and Sapphire Dairies (Private) Limited. Mr. Abdul Sattar Arain is a Fellow Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan as well as he holds a Master's Degree in Commerce. He has over 40 years of experience of working in financial management, project planning, Individual and corporate taxation. Mr. Nadeem has an extensive background in operations, general management, and business development. He is amongst the co-founders of The Resource Group (TRG), a Washington-DC-based investment holding company specializing in the global business process outsourcing & IT services sector. Mr. M. Naeem Khan is an AMP from Harvard Business School, Boston, USA, a fellow member of both The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan and The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales. He has exposure in oil marketing, where he extensively developed the retail chain and nurtured commercial customers, besides looking after the treasury and accounting functions. Dr. Mariam Chughtai is an Assistant Professor and founding Associate Dean at the LUMS School of Education. She is also the Director of Pakistan Programs for the Mittal South Asia Institute at Harvard University. She has a Doctorate in Education (Ed.D.) from Harvard University, specializing in Education Policy, Leadership, and Instructional Practice.


Board Effectiveness

SFL has established three board committees – Audit Committee, Human Resource & Remuneration Committee, and Risk Management Committee. During FY25, five meetings of the board of directors were held to evaluate the Company's overall performance towards its targets. The minutes of those meetings have been formally documented.


Financial Transparency

M/s. ShineWing Hameed Chaudhri & Co., a Category “B” firm on the SBP panel of auditors, serves as the external auditor of the Company. The auditor has expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has a well-structured organizational layout, with overall operations divided into eight broad functional divisions, which are further categorized into various sub-divisions to ensure a smooth flow of operations. The heads of departments report primarily to the CEO and COO, while the COO reports directly to the CEO.


Management Team

The management team comprises qualified and experienced professionals, led by the CEO. Mr. Shayan Abdullah serves in the position of director and oversees raw material procurement, accounts and marketing for the spinning divisions of SFL. Mr. Jawwad Faisal, Group CFO and COO of the Company, is a chartered accountant by profession and possesses ~25 years of experience.


Effectiveness

The management tier ensures effective delegation of functional responsibilities across various departments, facilitating a smooth flow of operations. The system’s implementation supports the integration of business processes and optimizes resources through synchronization and planning.


MIS

The Company has implemented an Oracle-based ERP—Oracle E-business suite—to accommodate large-scale and diversified operations. Regular updates to the software aid management in timely decision-making


Control Environment

The Company’s monthly MIS reports, which include comprehensive segment- and unit-wise performance reports, are formally reviewed by the CEO along with monthly accounts. The Company has a co-sourced internal audit function to ensure compliance, effective internal controls, and risk management, as well as to enhance operational efficiency


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

During MY25, approximately 24.4 million MT of cotton was produced globally, compared to about 24.2 million MT in MY24. Throughout the year, low cotton production was observed in India and Pakistan. However, this was partly offset by increases in cotton production in China, the United States, and Brazil by roughly 9.7%, 19.4%, and 15.7%, respectively. China remains the largest producer and consumer of cotton worldwide (MY21-25). Pakistan's cotton output declined by approximately 30.7%, due to reduced cultivation area and a surge in duty-free imports of cotton and yarn, which disrupted domestic markets. Conversely, cotton imports increased by around 234.0% YoY during the same period to satisfy domestic demand (FY24: roughly 70.0% YoY decline). Cotton arrivals for FY24-25 totaled about 5.5 million bales. The target for cotton production in FY26 is set at approximately 10.2 million bales. The sector's rising dependence on imported cotton poses a supply-side risk. For FY25, imports accounted for approximately 35% of the cotton supply (-11% in FY24), adding about USD 1.27 billion (USD 448 million in FY24) to the country's import bill. Textile exports reached USD 17.9 billion in FY25, a modest rise from USD 16.7 billion the previous year, reflecting a 7.2% year-over-year growth. The largest contribution came from the composite and garments segment, at USD 14 billion, which included the weaving segment at USD 1.8 billion and the spinning segment at USD 0.7 billion. The production of cotton cloth in FY25 declined by approximately 0.7% year over year, reaching around 877.1 million square meters. During FY25, about 25.3% of the cotton cloth produced was exported (compared to roughly 27.2% in FY24), with the rest used for the domestic market. The country's fabric exports fell by approximately 4.4% in FY25 (FY24: up about 5.8% YoY), with approximately 23.4% of Pakistan's cotton cloth exports going to Bangladesh (compared to about 19.9% in FY24), followed by the USA with about 8.1% of cotton cloth exports (compared to approximately 7.8% in FY24). In FY25, the transition from the final tax regime to the normal tax regime is expected to affect the profitability of export-oriented units, with a 29% tax on profits and a super tax of up to 10%. The recent removal of GST exemption (Finance Bill, 2025) on textile inputs for exporters registered under the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS) will offer tax protection and create a level playing field for domestic cotton and yarn producers. Currently, international cotton prices are higher than the price of locally produced cotton. The gap has widened to approximately 9.8 cents per pound (as of July 18, 2025), resulting in an average increase of about USD 36.8 per bale of imported cotton. A greater reliance on imported cotton could lead to higher raw material costs, ultimately impacting yarn prices and profit margins for the sector. Conversely, energy and finance costs are expected to stay within a range, given the projected reduction in interest rates and the absence of any major energy tariff increases. Considering the current climate change, flooding in major cotton regions, and shifting crop patterns, the target of approximately 10.2 million bales for FY26 appears challenging.


Relative Position

During FY25, SFL contributed a moderate share of the country’s total textile exports. It is one of the largest specialized yarn manufacturing and marketing Companies in Pakistan. The company’s total spindle count and looms stood at 102,480 and 164 respectively. The relative position of the company is considered strong. 


Revenues

During FY25, the Company experienced a modest incline in revenue growth, reaching PKR 50.5bln (FY24: PKR 47.4bln, 1QFY26: PKR 11.6bln), driven by a moderate improvement in business volumes. The Company’s revenue composition exhibited a notable shift form a predominantly export oriented sales base to a more balanced mix. Local sales clocked at PKR 29.8bln, surpassing export sales of PKR 25.1 billion. This diversification reflects the Company’s strategic focus on strengthening its domestic market presence while maintaining a robust export footprint. Spinning is the top-performing segment in revenue generation, contributing PKR 27.2bln to the Company’s top line, followed by PKR 13.9bln from Denim and PKR 9.3bln from Knits. The knitting segment recorded a notable recovery during the year, supported by improved demand dynamics in key export markets and enhanced operational performance. SFL’s clientele consists of established entities across various export destinations worldwide, primarily in Asia and European markets.


Margins

The Company’s gross margin declined YoY to ~8.8% (FY24: ~11.9%), primarily due to the continued procurement of imported raw cotton and elevated input costs. This also translated into lower operating margins, which dipped to ~3.0% (FY24: ~6.9%). The finance cost reduced to PKR 2,076mln (FY24: PKR 2,784mln), in line with the downward trajectory of the policy rate. Despite pressure on core margins, the Company’s net profitability increased manifold to PKR 13,667mln (FY24: PKR 3,373mln), largely driven by dividend income of PKR 17,478mln received from related parties, resulting in a strengthened net margin of ~27.0%.


Sustainability

The Group maintains a diversified business portfolio with interests across power generation, dairy, and retail segments. Over time, SFL has strategically broadened its income base beyond the textile business to mitigate concentration risk, undertaking core investments in the power sector and developing an equity investment portfolio. In line with its diversification strategy, SFL has strengthened its presence in the energy domain through the acquisition of a 50% shareholding in UCH Power (Private) Limited and UCH–II Power (Private) Limited. Looking ahead, the Company does not anticipate any significant capital expenditures within the textile segment, as the existing production infrastructure is considered sufficient to meet operational requirements.


Financial Risk
Working capital

SFL meets its working capital requirements through a mix of internal generation and short-term borrowings (STBs). The net-working capital days stood at endJune’25: 145 days (end-June’24: 149days). The Company’s short-term trade leverage stood at 29.0% as of FY25, depicting sufficient room to borrow. 


Coverages

A dip in free cash flows from operations (FY25: PKR 1,018mln. FY24: PKR 3,871mln) has impacted the interest coverage ratio to 0.5x in FY25 (FY24: 1.5x). The EBITDA to Finance cost ratio marginally declined to 1.7x (FY24:1.9x) on account of the surge in finance cost paid and dilution in gross profit.


Capitalization

The Company has a low-leveraged capital structure, with leverage increasing to 29.0% during FY25 (FY24: 27.8%) and financing mainly comprising KIBOR-based short-term borrowings (79.5%). The Company’s long-term borrowings stood at PKR 2.9bln, primarily consisting of subsidized borrowings (LTFF) from the SBP, while the equity base reached PKR 50.6bln (FY24: PKR 34.6bln), owing to the inclined profitability. 


 
 

Nov-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-25
3M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 19,596 18,816 16,448 15,215
2. Investments 15,133 11,350 8,208 4,303
3. Related Party Exposure 20,890 20,493 5,694 5,444
4. Current Assets 37,210 33,011 25,926 26,193
a. Inventories 20,888 17,843 14,891 14,503
b. Trade Receivables 5,656 5,728 5,596 7,447
5. Total Assets 92,830 83,669 56,276 51,156
6. Current Liabilities 11,891 10,788 7,676 7,879
a. Trade Payables 2,217 2,015 1,881 1,723
7. Borrowings 24,946 20,625 13,322 14,926
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 2,331 1,642 717 642
10. Net Assets 53,662 50,614 34,560 27,709
11. Shareholders' Equity 53,662 50,614 34,560 27,709
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 11,693 50,562 47,420 46,447
a. Cost of Good Sold (11,059) (46,112) (41,755) (37,530)
2. Gross Profit 634 4,450 5,665 8,917
a. Operating Expenses (728) (2,928) (2,378) (2,477)
3. Operating Profit (94) 1,522 3,287 6,439
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 873 18,807 3,711 1,639
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 778 20,329 6,997 8,079
a. Total Finance Cost (550) (2,076) (2,784) (1,984)
b. Taxation (363) (4,576) (841) (974)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) (134) 13,677 3,373 5,121
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) (91) 1,018 3,871 6,971
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (587) (970) 936 5,109
c. Changes in Working Capital (3,369) (5,465) 523 (2,295)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (3,955) (6,434) 1,459 2,814
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (549) 247 657 475
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 4,321 7,097 (1,814) (2,975)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (184) 910 302 314
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -7.5% 6.6% 2.1% 6.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 5.4% 8.8% 11.9% 19.2%
c. Net Profit Margin -1.1% 27.0% 7.1% 11.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -29.6% -8.8% 9.3% 10.1%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] -1.0% 32.1% 10.8% 20.1%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 196 159 163 163
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 179 145 149 147
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.3
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.6 1.7 1.9 4.4
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB -0.1 0.3 1.0 2.3
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -1.6 -4.9 4.1 1.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 31.7% 29.0% 27.8% 35.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 63.1 56.5 28.9 73.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.7% 9.1% 16.0% 10.5%

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-25

www.pacra.com