Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
10-Feb-26 BB+ A3 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

FFO Support Program delivers financial services efficiently, supported by strong governance practices and capable management. Led by CEO Irfan Khokhar and a seven-member Board, the Program supports inclusive lending, capacity-building, and social initiatives, empowering marginalized households across Pakistan and reinforcing its credibility in the microfinance sector.

Rating Rationale

FFO Support Program (“the Program”) is a Section 42 not-for-profit organization registered with the SECP, formed through the transformation of the Microfinance Program of the Farmers Friend Organization (FFO). Established in 2016, the Program aims to broaden financial inclusion and improve access to financial and non-financial services for underserved households. FFOSP offers appraisal-backed individual and group lending products, including Principal Loan (PL), Small Business Loan (SBL), Kisan Finance (KF), Mal Mawaishi Loan (MML), School Sahara Loan (SSL), Roshan Pakistan Loan (RPL), and PM Interest-Free Loan (PMIFL), complemented by social and non-financial interventions such as livestock insurance, credit for life insurance, financial education, business development training, vocational training, and gender empowerment initiatives tailored to client needs. Approximately ~74% of the Program’s clientele comprises women, reflecting a strong focus on women’s economic empowerment and household resilience. As of June 2025, FFOSP operates through 28 branches across Pakistan, with outreach primarily concentrated in rural and semi-urban areas where access to formal financial services remains limited, supporting communities that are largely excluded from the conventional banking system. The Program operates within Pakistan’s microfinance industry, which is closely linked to broader micro-economic indicators and plays a critical role in extending credit to low-income and vulnerable segments of the population. The industry comprises Non-Banking Finance Companies (NBFCs), Microfinance Banks (MFBs), and Rural Support Programs (RSPs), collectively forming a significant segment of the financial sector with a gross loan portfolio exceeding PKR 687 billion, of which MFBs account for approximately PKR 483 billion and MFIs for around PKR 204 billion. In MFI, the Average ticket sizes remain modest at ~PKR 60,684, with ~3.4 million active borrowers, reflecting the sector’s focus on livelihood and consumption-based financing. Non-performing loans declined to ~PKR 607.9 million, resulting in an infection ratio of ~1.1% in FY25. Within this operating environment, FFOSP maintains a focused presence, leveraging its localized branch network, client-centric product design, and close borrower engagement to support portfolio quality and outreach continuity. The Program operates under a stable governance framework, supported by an experienced and independent Board of Directors. Governance is strengthened through board-level committees covering audit, human resources, and credit & risk management, ensuring structured oversight and accountability. The management team is capable and experienced, with functional heads overseeing operations, finance, ICT, compliance, and risk management. The Program has established structured operational and reporting processes to monitor loan disbursements, portfolio performance, and recoveries. While internal controls are adequate, there is scope for further strengthening as the institution expands its operations. During FY25, the Program reported a gross loan portfolio of ~PKR 1,402 million, generating markup income of ~PKR 516 million and a profit after tax of ~PKR 27 million. Portfolio quality remained strong, with a PAR 30 of ~0.3%, reflecting disciplined credit appraisal and recovery practices. The equity-to-total-assets ratio stood at ~40.7%, providing a sound capitalization buffer against potential shocks. FFOSP relies primarily on borrowings from financial institutions for funding, maintains adequate liquidity levels, and continues to demonstrate prudent portfolio management and conservative risk practices.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent on the Program’s ability to maintain portfolio quality, sustain financial stability, and continue its outreach to underserved communities, particularly in line with its women-focused and development-oriented mandate. Continued emphasis on cost control, diversification of funding sources, and effective governance will remain important for long-term sustainability.

Profile
Structure

FFO Support Program (FFOSP) is registered as a Non-Banking Microfinance Company (NBMFC) under Section 42 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP). The license was issued on 31-10-2016, and the Program operates as a not-for-profit financial inclusion entity.


Background

FFOSP originated from the credit program of the Farmers Friend Organization (FFO), a development-oriented organization established in 2003 in Sheikhupura. The transformation into an SECP-regulated microfinance company in 2016 aimed at broadening outreach and enhancing access to financial and non-financial services for marginalized households. The institution has evolved into one of the growing development finance organizations in the microfinance sector of Pakistan.


Operations

FFO Support Program (FFOSP) delivers a diversified mix of financial and non-financial services tailored to the needs of underserved households, with a strong emphasis on sustainable livelihood outcomes and women’s economic empowerment. The Program conducts appraisal-backed individual and group lending, supported by complementary interventions in financial literacy, capacity building, and social sector initiatives, to enhance household economic resilience. FFOSP’s product suite is designed around client needs and includes multiple customised loan products such as Principal Loan and Small Business Loan for enterprise financing; Kisan Finance for agriculture producers; Mal Mawaishi Loan for livestock investment; School Sahara Loan to support low-cost school operations; Roshan Pakistan Loan for renewable energy solutions; and Prime Minister’s Interest-Free Loan (PMIFL) targeted at vulnerable households with limited financial access. These products, structured with varying loan sizes and repayment schedules, reflect the Program’s client-centric approach to financial inclusion and enterprise support. FFOSP also integrates insurance and safety net services, capacity-building trainings, and community awareness sessions to reinforce financial resilience and social development outcomes. Gender mainstreaming is a core operational focus nearly 74% of its clientele is female, reinforcing the Program’s role in empowering women micro-entrepreneurs. As of June 2025, FFOSP operates through 28 branches nationwide, enabling broad geographic outreach and deep community engagement across multiple districts of Pakistan.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

FFO Support Program operates without share capital, and its ultimate authority resides with its governing body / members, in line with its not-for-profit and development-oriented mandate. The governing members have undertaken responsibility for oversight and policy direction in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2017. This structure supports the Program’s mission-driven objectives while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.


Stability

Since its establishment, the ownership and governance structure of FFO Support Program has remained stable, supported by continuity at the governing body level and a long-term commitment towards financial inclusion objectives. The absence of frequent changes in governing members provides comfort regarding consistency in strategic direction and operational oversight.


Business Acumen

The governing members possess relevant experience in microfinance, development finance, and social sector initiatives, enabling effective oversight of the Program’s activities. Their collective expertise supports prudent policy formulation, disciplined growth, and a continued focus on portfolio quality and recoveries.


Financial Strength

Given its non-profit and program-based structure, the likelihood of direct financial support from governing members remains limited. However, the Program’s financial strength is supported by internally generated cash flows, retained surpluses, and access to institutional and development-oriented funding sources. However, the Program's robust financial management practices, diversified revenue streams, and strategic approach have reinforced its financial stability.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of FFO Support Program comprises seven members, including the Chairperson, Independent Directors, and Non-Executive Directors. The presence of independent and non-executive members supports objective oversight and reduces concentration of control. The Chairperson provides leadership to the Board, while overall governance is strengthened through participation of members with diversified professional backgrounds.


Members’ Profile

The Board members collectively possess diversified experience across engineering, trading, social development, gender and environmental initiatives, real estate, and operations management. The overall professional experience of Board members ranges up to nearly three decades, providing depth and maturity in strategic oversight. The inclusion of members with development-sector exposure supports alignment with the Program’s financial inclusion mandate, while business-oriented experience contributes to operational and financial prudence.


Board Effectiveness

Board effectiveness is reinforced through an active committee framework comprising the Audit Committee, Human Resource (HR) Committee, and Credit & Risk Management (CRM) Committee. The Audit Committee oversees financial reporting, internal controls, and audit-related functions, thereby strengthening financial discipline and transparency. The HR Committee is responsible for human resource policies, performance management, and succession planning, supporting organizational continuity. The CRM Committee reviews credit policies, monitors portfolio performance, and oversees key risk indicators, strengthening risk governance. The presence of independent and non-executive directors across these committees enhances governance quality and ensures balanced oversight. The attendance during the meetings has been satisfactory, reflecting the commitment of the members. Moreover, the minutes of the meetings are meticulously documented, ensuring transparency and accountability in all board activities.


Transparency

Illyas Saeed & Co., Chartered Accountants, serve as the External Auditors of the Program. For FY25, they issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, affirming the accuracy and reliability of the Program's financial reporting. An Internal Audit Department is in place, which reports directly to the Audit Committee, further strengthening the Program's commitment to transparency and accountability. Additionally, a dedicated Compliance Department conducts regular inspections of all relevant departments, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements and internal policies.


Management
Organizational Structure

FFOSP is a not-for-profit organization operating under a structured governance model. The organization is led by a Board of Directors comprising non-executive and independent members responsible for overseeing the overall strategy and operations. The Board ensures accountability, compliance, and alignment with the organization’s mission to support microfinance and development objectives. FFOSP operates with a decentralized branch network that facilitates efficient loan approvals, disbursements, and monitoring across all operational regions.


Management Team

The senior management team at FFO Support Program (FFOSP) comprises highly experienced professionals with extensive expertise in microfinance, financial operations, and institutional development. The Chief Executive Officer, Muhammad Irfan Khokhar, leads strategic and operational decisions, bringing over 30 years of multidimensional experience in the development sector and microfinance. Supporting him is Tahir Jameel Mirza, Head of Operations, who manages operational strategy and project execution, leveraging more than 35 years of experience in HR, operations, and finance. Muhammad Javed Aslam, Head of Compliance & Risk/ Company Secretary, ensures strict adherence to regulatory standards, strengthening internal controls, and promoting a robust culture of transparency and accountability, backed by 18 years of professional experience in finance, audit, and HR management. Muhammad Junaid Rehmat oversees end-to-end accounts management with more than 19 years of experience in financial accounting and compliance, while the finance function is led by Maqsood Alam Ansari, an ACCA-finalist professional with over 10 years of experience in financial reporting, budgeting, and accounting. Maria Arshad, Head of Human Resource, who oversees staff development, organizational design, and coordination, leveraging more than 11 years of experience in HR. Muhammad Noman Rehmat manages administration and procurement functions, ensuring operational support with 12 years of diversified experience, and Ali Raza Tariq Head of Internal Audit, ensures strong internal controls and compliance frameworks, backed by 11 years of professional experience in finance, audit & accounting. Additionally, Muhammad Kaleem Sabir, Head of ICT, directs technology infrastructure and digital transformation initiatives, leveraging over 15 years of IT experience. Collectively, this management team ensures the effective implementation of programs, adherence to financial and social objectives, and the continued advancement of FFOSP’s mission to promote financial inclusion across underserved communities.


Effectiveness

FFOSP benefits from a structured decision-making process, with defined committees overseeing operational and strategic priorities. Each department head reports directly to the CEO, ensuring accountability and timely escalation of critical matters. The management has consistently demonstrated efficiency in executing lending programs, maintaining portfolio quality, and achieving high recovery rates, reflecting operational effectiveness and strong oversight mechanisms.


MIS

FFO Support Program has established a robust Management Information System (MIS) that integrates branch‑level operations with centralized reporting to support effective decision‑making and risk management. The MIS captures key operational and financial metrics, including loan disbursements, portfolio quality, collection performance, and real‑time data analytics, enabling management to monitor performance and portfolio health across regions. As part of risk assessment and credit evaluation practices, FFOSP incorporates credit checks and bureau data into borrower evaluation processes, consistent with industry standards such as CIB (Credit Information Bureau) reporting, which assists in evaluating borrower credit histories. The MIS framework enhances transparency, supports compliance with regulatory and internal policies, and allows for timely reporting to senior management and stakeholders, thereby strengthening overall operational governance.


Risk Management framework

FFO Support Program has implemented a comprehensive risk management policy to effectively manage operational, financial, and credit risks across its portfolio. The loan approval process is decentralized, empowering branch-level teams to make timely and informed lending decisions, which enhances responsiveness and reduces bottlenecks associated with centralized processing. Loan recovery is systematically conducted through compliance and field officers at each branch, ensuring an organized and accessible approach to repayments. This decentralized model strengthens operational resilience, minimizes potential credit and operational risks, and promotes consistent adherence to the organization’s governance and risk mitigation standards. Regular monitoring, internal audits, and risk reporting further reinforce the framework, supporting informed decision-making by senior management.


Technology Infrastructure

FFO Support Program has strategically invested in technological infrastructure to enhance automation, operational efficiency, and scalability. Digital platforms are utilized for loan processing, client management, portfolio monitoring, and real-time reporting, allowing management to track performance across branches seamlessly. The technology framework also ensures data accuracy, security, and accessibility, enabling effective portfolio management and regulatory compliance. Looking ahead, FFOSP is committed to leveraging technological innovations to further improve service delivery, streamline operational workflows, and enhance financial literacy among clients, thereby supporting its mission of promoting financial inclusion and sustainable community development.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s microfinance sector remains a key pillar of financial inclusion, serving low-income and underserved segments amid a gradually stabilizing macroeconomic environment. During FY25, the overall microfinance industry, comprising Microfinance Banks (MFBs), Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), and Rural Support Programmes (RSPs), recorded a Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP) of ~PKR 687 billion, reflecting continued expansion supported by easing inflation, moderation in interest rates, and improved economic activity. The sector catered to an estimated ~12.2 million active borrowers, while the average loan size recovered to around ~PKR 56,344, indicating portfolio recalibration toward sustainable lending. Despite macro normalization, the industry continues to operate in a competitive and risk-sensitive environment, particularly given climate-related vulnerabilities and income volatility among borrowers. Within the broader industry, the MFIs and RSPs segment accounted for nearly ~23% of the total sector GLP in FY25, with their combined loan portfolio expanding sharply to ~PKR 204 billion, marking a significant YoY growth of about 80%. The active borrower base of this segment improved to around ~3.4 million, while the average loan size increased materially to nearly ~PKR 60,685, reflecting a gradual shift toward relatively higher-value, income-generating, and housing-related loans. The growth trajectory of MFIs and RSPs has been supported by disciplined lending practices, targeted development programs, and deeper community-level engagement, positioning this segment as comparatively more stable than MFBs during periods of economic stress. Asset quality indicators for MFIs and RSPs remained strong in FY25. Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) declined to ~PKR 587.9 million, despite the sharp expansion in the loan portfolio. Consequently, the infection ratio improved further to around ~1.1%, down from about ~1.3% in FY24. The consistently low NPL levels and infection ratios underscore the effectiveness of MFIs’ conservative credit appraisal frameworks, close borrower monitoring, and strong recovery mechanisms factors that continue to support the credit profile of well-established programs such as the FFO Support Program.


Relative Position

FFO Support Program operates as a small-sized Microfinance Institution (MFI) with a focused outreach strategy. While its overall scale remains limited compared to large MFIs, FFOSP has maintained a stable presence through prudent portfolio management and localized operations. As of Jun’25, the institution reported a gross loan portfolio of approximately PKR 1,402 million, reflecting gradual growth over recent years. The institution’s-controlled expansion, coupled with close borrower engagement and strong recovery performance, supports its relative position within the MFI segment. However, competitive pressures from larger MFIs with broader outreach and diversified product offerings remain a constraint on market share expansion.


Revenue

FFOSP's revenue stream is primarily driven by markup income from microfinance lending activities. During FY25, the institution generated markup income of ~PKR 516mln, compared to ~PKR 409mln in FY24, reflecting higher average outstanding advances and improved asset yields amid an elevated interest rate environment. The increase in revenue was mainly attributable to the repricing of the loan portfolio in line with market conditions. Net markup income constituted the entirety of total income, indicating reliance on core lending operations without meaningful contribution from non-markup income sources.


Profitability

FFOSP earning assets stood at ~PKR 1,435 mln in FY25, representing ~81.4% of total assets of PKR 1,763 mln, highlighting a strong asset base focused on income generation. The entity reported a profit after tax of ~PKR 27 mln in FY25, reflecting a modest yet positive profitability amidst operational and market challenges. The earnings indicate initial financial stability and demonstrate the potential for improved returns as the portfolio scales and operational efficiencies continue to strengthen.


Sustainability

FFOSP sustainability is underpinned by its conservative growth strategy, focus on portfolio quality, and strong recovery performance. The institution demonstrated operational viability, with an Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS) ratio of ~105.5% in FY25, indicating its ability to cover operating and financial costs through core income. However, long-term sustainability remains dependent on effective cost management, gradual portfolio expansion, and potential diversification of revenue streams. Continued emphasis on governance, risk management, and technology adoption is expected to support sustainable operations over the medium term.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

FFOSP exhibits a strong credit risk profile, supported by a decentralized loan approval framework and close monitoring at the branch level. As of Jun’25, the institution’s gross advances stood at ~PKR 1,402mln, while non-performing advances remained low at ~PKR 4mln, translating into a PAR 30 ratio of ~0.3%, which is significantly better than the sector average. The non-performing finances to equity ratio stood at ~0.6%, reflecting strong capital protection against asset quality deterioration. The loan portfolio remains granular with limited concentration risk, supporting overall asset quality.


Market Risk

Market risk exposure remains limited, as FFOSP's asset base is predominantly composed of microfinance advances. The institution maintains a minimal investment portfolio, with investments of ~PKR 46mln in mutual funds as of Jun’25, limiting exposure to market volatility. Earnings remain sensitive to interest rate movements, as higher rates support asset yields but also increase funding costs. Active pricing adjustments have partially mitigated this risk.


Funding

FFOSP relies entirely on borrowings for funding, with no deposit base. As of Jun’25, total borrowings amounted to ~PKR 1,000mln, sourced primarily from financial institutions. The cost of borrowings increased to ~20.5% during FY25, reflecting prevailing tight monetary conditions. While funding remains concentrated, FFOSP has maintained stable access to lenders, supporting liquidity and operational continuity. Nonetheless, reliance on borrowed funds exposes the institution to refinancing and cost-of-funds risks.


Cashflows & Coverages

Liquidity indicators remained adequate during FY25. Cash and bank balances stood at ~PKR 179mln, while deposits with banks amounted to ~PKR 33mln. The finances-to-funding ratio was recorded at ~140.6%, indicating effective utilization of available funding. However, limited liquidity buffers and the absence of deposits necessitate prudent cash flow management to meet obligations in a timely manner.


Capital Adequacy

As an MFI regulated by SECP, FFOSP is not subject to a prescribed minimum capital adequacy requirement. Nevertheless, the institution maintains a sound capitalization profile. As of Jun’25, equity stood at PKR 718 million, translating into an equity-to-total-assets ratio of 40.7%, providing a comfortable buffer against potential shocks. Capital formation improved modestly during FY25, supported by positive profitability, strengthening the institution’s risk absorption capacity.


 
 

Feb-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Total Finances 1,402 1,133 1,038
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Other Earning Assets 33 122 33
4. Non-Earning Assets 324 153 228
5. Non-Performing Finances 4 2 4
Total Assets 1,763 1,410 1,303
6. Deposits 0 0 0
7. Borrowings 1,000 700 590
8. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 45 59 53
Total Liabilities 1,045 759 643
Equity 718 651 660
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Mark Up Earned 516 409 345
2. Mark Up Expensed (174) (175) (160)
3. Non Mark Up Income 0 0 0
Total Income 342 234 185
4. Non-Mark Up Expenses (279) (187) (212)
5. Provisions/Write offs/Reversals (36) (2) 37
Pre-Tax Profit 27 45 10
6. Taxes 0 0 0
Profit After Tax 27 45 10
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
Portfolio Yield 40.6% 37.6% 26.9%
Minimum Lending Rate 38.5% 33.5% 26.1%
Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS) 105.5% 112.3% 102.9%
Return on Equity 3.9% 6.8% 1.4%
Cost per Borrower Ratio N/A N/A N/A
2. Capital Adequacy
Net NPL/Equity 0.6% 0.3% 0.6%
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 40.7% 46.2% 50.7%
Tier I Capital / Risk Weighted Assets N/A N/A N/A
Capital Adequacy Ratio N/A N/A N/A
Capital Formation Rate [(Profit After Tax - Cash Dividend ) / Equity] 4.2% 6.8% 1.4%
3. Funding & Liquidity
Liquid Assets as a % of Deposits & Short term Borrowings N/A N/A N/A
Demand Deposit Coverage Ratio N/A N/A N/A
Liquid Assets/Top 20 Depositors N/A N/A N/A
Funding Diversification (Deposits/(Deposits+Borrowings+Grants)) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Net Advances to Deposits Ratio N/A N/A N/A
4. Credit Risk
Top 20 Advances / Advances 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
PAR 30 Ratio 0.3% 0.2% 0.4%
Write Off Ratio 3.1% 3.6% 2.0%
True Infection Ratio 3.0% 3.5% 2.8%
Risk Coverage Ratio (PAR 30) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

Feb-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Feb-26

www.pacra.com