Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Dec-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Dec-24 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited was initially incorporated in 1973 as Sterling Products Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited, a subsidiary of Sterling Winthrop Inc., USA. In 1993, following Sterling Winthrop’s decision to divest its operations in Pakistan, the Company underwent a management buyout and was subsequently renamed Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited. Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon holds ~98% shareholding. He is a graduate of Babson College, Boston, USA, and brings over four decades of diversified experience within the pharmaceutical sector. The Board comprises two members: Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon, serving as Chairman, and Dr. Shahida Qaiser, serving as Chief Executive Officer.

Rating Rationale

Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited (“Pharmatec” or “the Company”) is a well-established pharmaceutical manufacturer operating in Pakistan since 1993. The Company’s core operations comprise toll manufacturing of oral products for leading multinational corporations (MNCs), including Haleon Pakistan (a subsidiary of GSK) and Abbott, alongside the manufacturing and marketing of an expanding proprietary portfolio of 50+ products across various therapeutic segments such as cardiovascular, diabetes, analgesics, antibiotics, and vitamins. Over time, Pharmatec has continued to invest in the modernization and expansion of its production infrastructure, which is now fully GMP and GLP compliant and supports a broad product range including injectables, creams, ointments, gels, liquids/drops, tablets, and capsules. Despite a large number of registered pharmaceutical entities in Pakistan, the sector remains highly concentrated, with the top 50 players accounting for ~80% of the market. The industry continues to rely heavily on imported APIs, exposing manufacturers to inherent exchange rate risk. Being a price-regulated sector, the ability to pass on cost escalations remains limited in essential drugs category; however, recent price adjustments in non-essential drugs category and currency stabilization have supported margin recovery across the industry. Within this context, the Company’s long-standing association with leading MNCs provides stability and visibility to its revenue base. Notably, Pharmatec is the exclusive manufacturer of the Panadol brand in Pakistan. To mitigate revenue concentration risk inherent in toll manufacturing, the Company has strategically expanded its own product portfolio, which now contributes ~50% to total sales. Furthermore, the recent inclusion of “ENO,” another top-selling Haleon brand, into the toll manufacturing portfolio is expected to further strengthen future revenues. In FY25 exports remained stagnant due to ongoing geopolitical challenges, contributing ~22% to the topline, offering a natural hedge against foreign exchange volatility to some extent. During the period under review, the Company reported revenues of PKR 5,458 million, reflecting a growth of ~12.6%, driven by both price and volumetric gains thus profitability margins largely sustained at all levels. The Company’s governance framework provides room for improvement, as the Board comprises only two members and lacks independent oversight. Nevertheless, a clearly defined organizational structure and adequate internal control mechanisms are in place. Pharmatec’s financial risk profile remains sound, supported by an adequate working capital cycle, strong cash flow coverages, and a low-leveraged capital structure. Going forward, the sponsors intend to expand production capacity, including the establishment of a new OTS facility, funded through a mix of debt and equity, while continuing to broaden the Company’s product portfolio.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to continue expanding its topline while sustaining healthy profitability margins. The timely and successful execution of the envisaged expansion plans, in line with the shared financial projections, will be essential. Furthermore, maintaining an adequate leverage profile and adhering to prudent financial management practices will remain critical for the sustainability of the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Pharmatec Pakistan (herein referred to as “Pharmatec” or “the Company’ was incorporated on 5th August 1993 as a Private Limited Company under the Companies Ordinance 1984 (now the Companies Act 2017).


Background

Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited began its operations in 1973 as Sterling Products Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited, a subsidiary of Sterling Winthrop Inc., USA, the original owner of the globally recognized Panadol brand. In 1993, following Sterling Winthrop’s decision to divest its operations in Pakistan, the Company underwent a management buyout and was reconstituted as Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited. Since then, Pharmatec has evolved into a prominent pharmaceutical manufacturer in the country, producing a broad range of generic medicines and serving as a key toll manufacturing partner for leading global brands, including Haleon (formerly GSK). The Company’s modern GMP- and GLP-compliant facilities support the production of solid, liquid, and injectable dosage forms, underscoring its continued emphasis on quality, innovation, and expanding its footprint in both domestic and international markets.


Operations

Pharmatec’s registered office and manufacturing facility are located at D-86/A, Manghopir Road, S.I.T.E., Karachi. The Company is primarily engaged in contract manufacturing for several leading multinationals, including Haleon Pakistan, GSK, and Abbott Laboratories Pakistan, while also manufacturing and marketing its own diverse product range. Over the years, Pharmatec has significantly upgraded its production infrastructure, including the addition of a dedicated injectables facility in 2003. The Company operates modern GMP-compliant plants equipped to manufacture tablets, liquids, injectables, creams, ointments, and gels. Pharmatec has been providing toll manufacturing services to Abbott Pakistan since finalizing a marketing and licensing arrangement in 2016. Notably, the Company is also the exclusive manufacturer of the Panadol portfolio for GSK in Pakistan.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. is a privately held entity, predominantly owned by its founder, Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon, who retains approximately 98% shareholding. The remaining stake is held by Pharmaceutical International Ltd.


Stability

The ownership structure is expected to remain stable in the foreseeable future, as indicated by management. The sponsor has formally designated his son, Mr. Ismail Hayat Noon, as successor. Mr. Ismail has been actively involved in the business since 2016 and currently oversees various operational functions. The presence of a clearly defined succession plan reinforces stability within the Company’s ownership and supports long-term continuity.


Business Acumen

Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon brings over four decades of pharmaceutical experience, beginning with Sterling Products International in 1983 and serving as Managing Director of Sterling Products Pakistan from 1987. He led the 1993 management buyout to establish Pharmatec Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. Under his leadership, the company has achieved sustained growth, expanded toll manufacturing partnerships, diversified its branded portfolio, and invested in GMP-compliant facilities. His broader entrepreneurial experience, including ownership of Hosanna Textile and Ismara Healthcare, demonstrates his versatile business capability.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of the family come from the reputable Noon family. Besides Pharmatec, the sponsor is also the soleproprietor of Hosanna Textile, a dyeing and finishing textile plant, and Ismara International, a trading firm that hasinternational collaborations in the field of cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals, and dietary supplements. The family has also substantial agricultural land holdings in Punjab. The sponsor has adequate capacity to provide financial support to the company.


Governance
Board Structure

Pharmatec Pakistan’s Board of Directors comprises only Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon, Chairman and majority owner (~98%) with over four decades of pharmaceutical experience, and Dr. Shahida Qaisar, Group CEO, a medical doctor with a Master’s in Pharmacology from London who has led the company since 1998. This compact board combines strategic oversight and deep technical expertise, reflecting a closely held, family-driven governance structure.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon, Chairman, a Babson College graduate with over four decades of experience in the pharmaceutical industry, and Dr. Shahida Qaisar, Group CEO, a medical graduate from Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, with a Master’s in Pharmacology from the University of London, who has been with the company since 1998. Both bring extensive expertise in pharmaceuticals, generics, and medical devices, combining strategic leadership, industry insight, and technical knowledge to drive the company’s growth and operations.


Board Effectiveness

The board’s effectiveness is limited by its small size and lack of independent oversight or formal committees. Appointing non-executive or independent directors and establishing board committees with clearly defined terms of reference (TORs) could significantly strengthen governance and decision-making.


Financial Transparency

The external auditors of the company, Grant Thornton Anjum Rahman Chartered Accountants. are listed in category A in the SBP’s panel of auditors. They have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the company for the year ending June 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

Pharmatec Pakistan has a multilayered management structure, overseen by the Board of Directors and Group CEO, Dr. Shahida Qaisar, with the Chairman, Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon, providing strategic oversight. The management is organized into functional departments including Sales, Marketing, Finance, IT, HR, Quality Control, Supply Chain, and Internal Audit, with all department heads reporting to the Managing Director. The company employs approximately 600 staff in manufacturing, a field force of over 300 medical representatives, and specialized teams in pharmacovigilance, regulatory affairs, and commercial operations, ensuring efficient operational, technical, and regulatory management across its business.


Management Team

Pharmatec’s senior management team comprises seasoned professionals with extensive experience across the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors. The governance framework is led by Mr. Pervez Hayat Noon (Chairman), bringing over four decades of diversified industry exposure, and Dr. Shahida Qaisar (Group CEO), an M.Sc. in Pharmacology with more than forty years of leadership within the Group. Operational depth is strengthened by Mr. Muhammad Arsalan Batla (COO), an FCMA and MBA with 24 years of experience in finance and operations. Recent appointments further enhance the leadership structure: Dr. Atif Khan (CCO), an M.B.B.S. with 19 years of commercial and strategic experience across leading multinational and local pharmaceutical companies, and Mr. Muhammad Zubair (CTO), a pharmacist with over 22 years of technical and operational expertise overseeing production, engineering, and R&D. Collectively, the team reflects a strong blend of strategic, technical, and functional capabilities, providing adequate stability and depth from a rating perspective.


Effectiveness

The Company has established a well-structured management framework supported by clearly defined and documented SOPs across all functional areas. Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines for each department are articulated through formal policies, ensuring process clarity and operational discipline. A structured performance evaluation and monitoring mechanism is in place, facilitating regular oversight of departmental outputs and alignment with organizational objectives. These measures collectively enhance the effectiveness of the management structure and support consistent execution of strategic and operational plans.


MIS

Pharmatec is using Microsft Dynamics AX 2012 as its ERP software since 2014. All the business functionsincluding Finance, supply chain, production, quality management and sales are integrated into the software. Thecompany also uses SmartHCM, a cloud-based Human capital management software to automate and streamlineits HR function.


Control Environment

The company has a dedicated quality management department in place to ensure that the quality of the productsare up to the mark. The company has also obtained various certifications including ISO 9001-2015, ISO 13485-2016, ISO 14001-2015, and is also compliant with ECOVADIS. Moreover, the company has an internal auditdepartment that ensures adherence to the SOPs.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

According to international monitoring firm IQVIA, Pakistan’s pharmaceutical sector recorded a 21.79% growth in calendar year 2024 compared to the previous year, reaching a market value of Rs. 962.5 billion. This growth has largely been driven by a deregulatory policy introduced earlier in the year, which allowed pharmaceutical companies to adjust prices for non-essential medicines in response to rising production costs. The revenue surge was primarily the result of price adjustments, rather than a significant increase in unit sales. The industry remains heavily dependent on imported active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), making it vulnerable to supply chain disruptions and foreign exchange volatility, particularly due to the depreciation of the Pakistani Rupee (PKR). This has constrained the industry's ability to pass on costs, especially in the essential medicines segment, where pricing remains regulated. Over the past year, the sector sold 3.7 billion units, reflecting a modest volume growth of 2.27%, while revenue growth was largely price-driven.


Relative Position

The Company maintains strong and long-standing relationships with leading pharmaceutical players in the market, supporting its positioning within the contract manufacturing and formulation space. In addition to third-party manufacturing, the Company has developed its own product range, which provides an avenue for brand-led growth. Despite these strengths, the Company’s overall market share remains below 1%, reflecting its relatively modest scale within the broader pharmaceutical industry. Sustained efforts toward product diversification, capacity enhancement, and deeper market penetration will be essential to improving its competitive positioning.


Revenues

The company’s top line continued its growth trajectory during FY25, driven by the expansion of its product portfolio and consistent demand in both local and export markets. Revenues increased by 12.6% YoY, reaching PKR 5,458 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 4,846 million; FY23: PKR 4,023 million). Of the total revenue, approximately 50% was derived from toll manufacturing, 28% from domestic sales, and the remaining 22% from exports. The growth reflects the company’s ability to maintain its market presence despite macroeconomic pressures.


Margins

The company sustained healthy margins during FY25, with the gross profit margin recorded at 45.1% (FY24: 48.6%), reflecting a moderate decline due to higher input and energy costs. The net profit margin improved slightly to 5.0% (FY24: 4.8%), supported by better operational efficiency and cost rationalization. The operating profit margin stood at 10.4% (FY24: 9.7%), indicating a steady improvement in core profitability despite inflationary conditions.


Sustainability

The company is expanding and installing new manufacturing facilities that will enhance its production capacity inthe coming years. The company is eyeing to launch multiple new products in the coming years. Moreover, Pharmatec’s association with leading pharmaceutical players provides a steady revenue stream to the company.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The company’s net working capital cycle stood at 76 days in FY25 (FY24: 80 days), showing improvement primarily due to better inventory and receivable management. Gross working capital days improved to 91 days (FY24: 98 days), while trade receivables days remained stable at 58 days (FY24: 60 days). The current ratio improved to 3.7x (FY24: 3.0x), reflecting strong liquidity management. The short-term leverage ratio increased slightly to 58.9% (FY24: 47.5%), indicating higher utilization of short-term financing to support operations.


Coverages

Operating cash flow generation improved notably, with FCFO rising to PKR 711 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 423 million). Consequently, the FCFO to finance cost ratio improved to 7.6x (FY24: 5.1x), and the EBITDA to finance cost ratio strengthened to 8.3x (FY24: 7.6x), reflecting robust debt-servicing capacity. The core coverage ratio (FCFO to Finance Cost + CMLTB + Excess STB) also improved to 4.4x (FY24: 3.3x), supported by consistent profitability and efficient cash management.


Capitalization

The company maintained a moderately leveraged capital structure, with a leverage ratio of 23.9% in FY25 (FY24: 23.0%; FY23: 11.4%), showing stability in the capital mix. Total borrowings stood at PKR 624 million as of June 2025 (FY24: PKR 576 million), primarily to support working capital and capacity expansion. Short-term debt constituted 38.1% of total borrowings (FY24: 63.9%), indicating a shift towards longer-term funding. The Debt-to-Equity ratio remained healthy, reflecting the company’s prudent financial management and sufficient equity cushion to absorb business shocks.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,628 1,368 914
2. Investments 51 2 0
3. Related Party Exposure 4 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,910 1,943 1,788
a. Inventories 531 433 575
b. Trade Receivables 836 908 677
5. Total Assets 3,592 3,313 2,702
6. Current Liabilities 514 639 709
a. Trade Payables 221 208 250
7. Borrowings 624 576 221
8. Related Party Exposure 88 18 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 104 86 45
10. Net Assets 2,263 1,994 1,726
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,263 1,994 1,726
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,458 4,846 4,023
a. Cost of Good Sold (2,995) (2,489) (2,067)
2. Gross Profit 2,462 2,357 1,956
a. Operating Expenses (1,893) (1,885) (1,699)
3. Operating Profit 569 472 256
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (17) (35) 69
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 552 437 325
a. Total Finance Cost (106) (99) (58)
b. Taxation (174) (105) (52)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 273 233 215
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 711 423 283
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 625 371 257
c. Changes in Working Capital (138) (153) (145)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 487 217 113
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (303) (455) (76)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (72) 24 (35)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 112 (213) 1
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 12.6% 20.5% 21.0%
b. Gross Profit Margin 45.1% 48.6% 48.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 5.0% 4.8% 5.3%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 10.5% 5.6% 3.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.8% 12.5% 13.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 91 98 97
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 76 80 80
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.7 3.0 2.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 8.3 7.6 11.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 4.4 3.3 6.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.7 0.6 0.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 23.9% 23.0% 11.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 37.7 62.3 45.6
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 14.5% 22.5% 15.4%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com