Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Dec-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
20-Dec-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

United Ethanol Industries Limited is a public unlisted Company. Primary business activity of the Company involves manufacturing and sale of industrial grade ethanol. United Ethanol has a installed production capacity of 120,000 liters per day. The Company was incorporated in 2003, and is part of United Group. The Group entities include three sugar mills (Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills, SGM Sugar Mills and Ranipur Sugar Mills (Pvt) Limited), United Ethanol Industries Limited, Agro Trade (Pvt.) Limited, United Agro Chemicals, United Commodities (Pvt) Limited and Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited. The Essarani Family acquired the Company in 2016. Shareholding of the Company rests with Essarani Family. The Company is headed by Dr. Tara Chand, the CEO. He is ably supported by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect United Ethanol’s (‘United Ethanol Industries Limited' or 'the Company’) sustained market standing within Pakistan’s ethanol industry. A pivotal strategic linkage reinforcing the ratings lies in the Company’s association with the United Group, a diversified conglomerate with consolidated revenues of approximately PKR 67.3 billion and total assets of PKR 40.7 billion as of MY24. The Group’s strong financial footing and established presence across the sugar and allied sectors provide a sound foundation of operational and financial support to United Ethanol. The Company benefits from vertical integration through its association with group sugar mills including Ranipur Sugar Mills (Pvt) Limited, SGM Sugar Mills and Sindh Abadgar Sugar Mills which ensures consistent raw material supply and enhances cost efficiency. Furthermore, the Group’s geographically diversified operations contribute to supply chain resilience and operational continuity, underpinning steady financial performance.
Despite these strengths, the Company remains exposed to sectoral risks stemming from fluctuations in sugarcane yield and quality due to agronomic conditions, cyclical crop patterns, and climate change impacts across the country. Volatility in raw material pricing continues to exert pressure on margins, underscoring the need for prudent cost and inventory management. On the external front, international ethanol prices have remained subdued amid global economic uncertainty, weighing on profitability metrics. Furthermore, the Company’s export performance is vulnerable to evolving global trade dynamics, particularly following the European Commission’s decision to suspend Pakistan’s GSP+ tariff preferences on ethanol, effectively revoking preferential tariff treatment for exports to the European market
United Ethanol’s revenue remains predominantly export-driven, with 97% of sales from international markets. During 3QMY25, topline declined to PKR 4.0 billion (3QMY24: PKR 5.4 billion) amid weaker global ethanol prices. Profitability remained resilient, supported by sustained gross margins from lower molasses costs and operational efficiencies through vertical integration. Net margins remains stable, reflecting lower finance costs followed by the SBP’s policy rate cut. The Company maintains a conservative capital structure with short-term ERF borrowings, stable leverage and strong liquidity, reflecting sustained financial resilience amid pricing pressures and sectoral volatility.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings hinge on the management's adeptness in consistently preserving profit margins. It is imperative that the management exercises prudent debt management and ensures robust liquidity, as these factors play a pivotal role in determining the ratings. A substantial rise in debt, decline in coverages, will adversely affect the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

United Ethanol Industries Limited, referred to as "United Ethanol" or "the Company," operates as a publicly unlisted entity.


Background

United Ethanol Industries Limited was established in 2003 and was initially owned by the Etihad Group, a prominent business conglomerate. Over the years, the company gained recognition in the ethanol production industry. However, in 2016 a significant transition took place when ownership of the company was acquired by the Essarani Family. This acquisition marked a pivotal moment in the company’s history, as it subsequently became a vital part of the United Group, a diversified business entity with a strong presence in various sectors. The Essarani Family’s leadership and strategic vision have since played a crucial role in shaping the future direction and growth of the company within the United Group.



Operations

The company's manufacturing facility is strategically located in Sadiqabad, Rahimyar Khan, providing easy access to 11 sugar mills within a 100-kilometer radius, including its own subsidiary, SGM Sugar Mills. Specializing in the production of ENA Grade ethanol (~96% v/v ethanol) and B Grade ethanol (~94% v/v ethanol), the facility boasts an installed production capacity of 120,000 liters per day. During 9M-MY25, the Company produced 32.37 million liters of ethanol, compared to 29.45 million liters in MY24, reflecting a slight increase. The improvement was primarily driven by higher availability of molasses during the period.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership structure of the company is held by the Essarani Family, with Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani holding a ~24% stake. His four sons are also significant shareholders: Mr. Asha Ram owns ~20%, Dr. Tara Chand holds ~24%, Mr. Mahesh Kumar possesses ~22%, and Mr. Jugdesh Kumar has a ~9% stake in the Company. This distribution reflects a family-controlled ownership model, ensuring that decision-making remains centralized within the family, which can contribute to a unified long-term strategic vision for the company.


Stability

Given the current ownership distribution and the strong family involvement, it is unlikely that significant changes will occur in the near future. The family's control of the majority of shares and the absence of outside investors suggest that the enterprise is positioned for continuity. This stability provides a solid foundation for maintaining long-term operations and can also foster trust with stakeholders, including employees, customers, and business partners, who value consistency in leadership and direction.


Business Acumen

The Essarani family brings a wealth of experience in the agricultural sector, operating under the umbrella of the 'United Group.' The group's diversified portfolio spans multiple industries, with key assets including three sugar mills—Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills, SGM Sugar Mills and Ranipur Sugar Mills (Pvt) Limited. Additionally, the family’s holdings extend to United Ethanol Industries Limited, a major player in ethanol production, as well as Agro Trade Private Limited, United Commodities (Pvt) Limited, United Agro Chemicals and Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited, which further strengthen the group’s overall business presence.


Financial Strength

The company maintains robust financial stability attributed to the support of its group and sponsors. As of the MY24, the group's total assets amounted to ~PKR 40.7 billion. During this period, the group achieved a net profit of ~PKR 2.5 billion. The group maintains a moderate level of leverage. This stable financial position the Company for continued growth and resilience in the face of market fluctuations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors is composed of four members, encompassing the Chairman, CEO, and two Non-Executive Directors. The board is predominantly influenced by the sponsoring family, lacking independent oversight, signifying an opportunity for enhancement. The sponsors have expressed their intention to augment the Board's composition by appointing an independent director in the future.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani serves as the Chairman of the Board and also holds the position of Chairman on the board of all other group companies, namely Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills Limited, SGM Sugar Mills Limited, Ranipur Sugar Mills Limited, Synergy Packaging (Pvt) Limited, United Commodities (Pvt) Limited, Agro Trade (Pvt) Limited and United Agro Chemicals. With over 47 years of experience, he assumed the chairmanship role. Meanwhile, his son, Mr. Mahesh Kumar, serves as a Non-Executive Director, bringing more than 21 years of experience to the board. Additionally, Mr. Mahesh Kumar holds a position on the board of Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills Limited and SGM Sugar Mills Limited.


Board Effectiveness

During the MY25, the Board of Directors convened for a total of four meetings, ensuring that detailed and formal minutes were recorded for each of these sessions. These meetings served as key opportunities for the Board to discuss and make decisions on various matters concerning the company’s operations, strategies, and governance. At this time, United Ethanol has not implemented any specific Board committees, which are often used by companies to delegate particular responsibilities or areas of oversight to smaller, specialized groups within the Board. Without these committees, all decision-making and oversight duties fall directly to the full Board.


Financial Transparency

The Company's external auditors are Reanda Haroon Zakaria & Co. Chartered Accountants The audit firm is rated in category 'B' of SBP's panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is clearly defined, with distinct reporting lines that differentiate responsibilities between the production site and the head office. Operational functions are primarily overseen by the General Manager (GM) of the Mill, who is responsible for day-to-day production activities. On the other hand, support functions, with the exception of finance, are managed centrally at the group level. These functions are under the supervision of the Group Chief Financial Officer, who ensures consistent oversight and alignment with the company’s overall strategy.


Management Team

The Company’s management team is composed of experienced professionals, although they have not been with the Company for an extended period. Dr. Tara Chand, the CEO, brings over 19 years of expertise in the sugar and allied industries. In addition to his role as CEO of the Company, Dr. Chand also serves as the CEO of Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills. He is supported by a skilled leadership team, including Mr. Abdul Waheed, who serves as the General Manager (GM) of the Factory, and Mr. Saqib Ghaffar is the Group Director Finance. Together, they provide strong leadership and direction for the Company.


Effectiveness

The Company currently does not have formally established management committees. However, the management team engages in regular performance discussions to assess and review ongoing activities. These discussions allow the leadership to evaluate the progress of various initiatives, address challenges, and ensure alignment with the Company’s strategic goals


MIS

The Company has implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software from Cosmosoft to streamline its operations and enhance efficiency. This software helps integrate various business processes, providing a centralized system for managing key functions such as inventory, production, finance, and human resources.


Control Environment

The internal audit function is currently centralized at the group level. Going forward, the group plans to enhance its control environment by expanding the internal audit team, adding more personnel to oversight and improve the effectiveness of internal controls across the organization.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry, the country’s second-largest agro-based sector with approximately 90 mills and an annual crushing capacity of 80–90 million metric tons, continues to face structural challenges—chiefly the government-mandated sugarcane support prices, which are based on farmers' input costs and often compress millers’ margins.  In MY25, sugarcane production declined to 84.2 million metric tons from 87.6 million metric tons in MY24, primarily due to below-average rainfall. Lower yields and weak recovery rates resulted in a subdued crushing season, reducing sugar production to 6.3 million metric tons from 6.8 million metric tons in the previous year. Opening stocks for MY25 stood at 1.4 million metric tons, of which 0.8 million metric tons were approved for export. Domestic consumption rose to 6.6 million metric tons, creating a supply-demand imbalance exacerbated by export volumes and reduced output, leading to a sharp increase in sugar prices.  To curb market volatility, the federal government authorized the import of 500,000 metric tons of sugar. The Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) had already accepted bids for 200,000 tons at USD 580–586 per ton, equating to approximately PKR 165/kg.  Looking ahead, sugarcane output in MY26 is expected to recover, driven by improved water availability following floods and heavy rainfall in Punjab.


Relative Position

In MY25, the Company accounted for a modest yet notable share of Pakistan’s total ethanol exports, underscoring its meaningful presence in the national export landscape.


Revenues

The Company’s revenue base remained heavily export-driven, with exports accounting for 97% of total revenue in 3QMY25, reinforcing its dependence on international markets and exposure to global price volatility. Revenue for the quarter declined to PKR 4,005 million, representing a 27.7% drop from PKR 5,541 million in 3QMY24 and PKR 7,040 million in MY24. This contraction was primarily driven by lower international ethanol prices, which averaged USD 700–800 per ton amid global supply-demand adjustments and competitive pressures. Looking ahead, the European Commission’s suspension of Pakistan’s GSP+ tariff preferences on ethanol introduces an additional export-market constraint, as the Company will face non-preferential tariffs in Europe, likely compressing export.


Margins

During 3QMY25, a decline in molasses prices supported a partial recovery in gross profitability, signaling relief from elevated input costs and contributing to improved margin stability. The gross profit margin strengthened to 20.3%, up from 16.2% in MY24, which translated into a higher operating profit margin of 12.7% (MY24: 9.3%). Consequently, the net profit margin improved to 6.7%, compared to 5.1% in MY24, reflecting enhanced cost efficiency. Although margins improved during the period, the sharp decline in sales translated into a weaker bottom line. Net income fell by approximately 22%, reaching PKR 266 million in 3QMY25 compared to PKR 341 million in 3QMY24. This indicates that the margin recovery was insufficient to offset the adverse impact of reduced topline.


Sustainability

The Company has recently acquired Ranipur Sugar Mills (Pvt) Limited, which has a crushing capacity of 8,500 tons per day. This strategic acquisition has strengthened the Company’s overall business profile by enhancing its asset base and diversifying its operations into the sugar segment. Through this backward integration, the Company has successfully streamlined the procurement of molasses, which will contribute positively to cost efficiency and supply reliability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s net working capital cycle deteriorated in 3QMY25, extending to 147 days from 120 days in MY24. The elongation in the cycle was primarily driven by a rise in inventory holding days, which increased to 142 days in 3QMY25 from 104 days in MY24. The higher inventory levels suggest slower inventory turnover, indicating potential inefficiencies in inventory management or a buildup of unsold stock. On the other hand, receivable days improved to 10 days in 3QMY25, compared to 21 days in MY24, reflecting enhanced collection efficiency and better credit control measures, which positively impacted liquidity. Payable days remained relatively stable at around 5 days, implying consistent payment practices with suppliers. Overall, while the Company’s working capital management reflects stronger receivable discipline, the elevated inventory levels have exerted pressure on the cash conversion cycle.


Coverages

In MY24, the Company’s financial coverage metrics reflected a moderation in performance, primarily due to weaker operating cash generation. The interest coverage ratio declined to 3.1x, compared to 4.2x in MY23, driven by a notable reduction in free cash flow from operations to PKR 868 million (MY23: PKR 1,726 million). Similarly, the debt coverage ratio decreased to 2.1x in MY24 from 2.5x in MY23, indicating reduced headroom for servicing both interest and principal obligations. While the Company remains adequately positioned to meet its debt commitments, the downward trend underscores the need to strengthen operating cash flows to preserve financial flexibility.


Capitalization

The Company’s capital structure remained conservative in 3QMY25, with the Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio declining to approximately 22%, from 31% in MY24. The moderation in leverage reflects a marginal reduction in total borrowings, underscoring the Company’s prudent financial management and balanced funding mix. Total debt declined to PKR 1,764 million in 3QMY25, from PKR 2,613 million in MY24, primarily due to a reduced reliance on short-term working capital facilities. The Company continues to maintain a debt-free long-term profile, providing it with financial flexibility and a low-risk balance sheet structure. Meanwhile, shareholders’ equity increased to PKR 5,945 million in 3QMY25, up from PKR 5,769 million in MY24, supported by healthy retained earnings. This steady growth in equity reinforces the Company’s capacity to internally fund operations and sustain its capital base.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
9M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,613 3,698 3,724 3,746
2. Investments 702 2 0 312
3. Related Party Exposure 483 200 540 0
4. Current Assets 3,992 5,613 4,732 5,060
a. Inventories 2,582 1,552 2,448 1,389
b. Trade Receivables 4 302 508 697
5. Total Assets 8,789 9,513 8,997 9,118
6. Current Liabilities 413 444 455 216
a. Trade Payables 4 146 64 64
7. Borrowings 1,764 2,613 2,477 3,546
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 667 685 0 0
10. Net Assets 5,945 5,770 6,065 5,356
11. Shareholders' Equity 5,945 5,770 6,065 5,306
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 4,005 7,040 6,044 6,456
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,191) (5,899) (3,886) (4,578)
2. Gross Profit 814 1,141 2,158 1,877
a. Operating Expenses (306) (488) (420) (336)
3. Operating Profit 508 653 1,738 1,541
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 24 159 (155) (379)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 532 813 1,584 1,162
a. Total Finance Cost (73) (312) (440) (202)
b. Taxation (193) (141) (79) (74)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 267 359 1,065 885
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 460 868 1,726 1,371
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 460 534 1,331 1,196
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 1,378 (720) (1,401)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 460 1,912 611 (204)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (137) 164 (347)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 136 (1,375) 874
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 460 1,912 (600) 322
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -24.1% 16.5% -6.4% #DIV/0!
b. Gross Profit Margin 20.3% 16.2% 35.7% 29.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 6.7% 5.1% 17.6% 13.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 11.5% 31.9% 16.6% -0.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.1% 6.1% 18.7% 16.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 153 125 153 101
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 147 120 149 97
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 9.7 12.6 10.4 23.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 12.0 3.6 4.4 7.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 12.0 2.1 2.5 3.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 22.9% 31.2% 29.0% 40.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 143.2 29.8 65.9 102.2
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 2.3% 10.9% 13.8% 5.5%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com