Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
28-Nov-25 A A1 Stable Maintain -
30-Nov-24 A A1 Stable Maintain -
01-Dec-23 A A1 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited commenced operations in Nov-92. The principal activities of the Company is production and sale of crystalline sugar including its by-products i.e. molasses, bagasse, Ethanol & C02. The company is majorly owned by Akhtar Family. The overall control of the company vests in seven-member Board of Directors (BoD), including the CEO. The installed capacities are | Sugar - crushing at 48,500 TCD | Distillery to produce 265,000 liters of EPD | CO2. TSML plants are located at Faisalabad, DIK and Muzaffargarh, Punjab. The shares of the Company are listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML or “the Company") as a strong player in Pakistan’s sugar, ethanol, and CO2 sectors, leveraging an integrated operational model. The Company operates across three primary business segments— sugar, ethanol, and CO2—contributing ~83.4%, 15.8% and ~0.8% to total revenue, respectively. The Company is exposed to market risks, primarily stemming from fluctuations in sugarcane yield and quality, which are influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, volatility in raw material prices, heightens operational uncertainty, necessitating robust supply chain and cost controls. Global ethanol prices have remained suppressed amid macroeconomic uncertainty, exerting downward pressure on the Company’s profitability. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. Despite sector headwinds, TSML managed stable operational performance through effective procurement and efficient plant utilization. On the financial front, TSML’s profitability declined during 9MMY25, with gross profit margin contracting to 13.4% (MY24: 16%), primarily due to rising costs and operational pressures. This contraction led to a compress net profit margin of 0.9% (MY24: 2.8%). Operating margin also moderated to 11% (MY24: 13%), reflecting higher operating expenses. Net working days remained elevated due to the accumulation of finished stock. Leverage indicators increased, with total borrowing rising to 62.8% (MY24: 58%), driven by higher reliance on short-term financing. TSML upholds a prudently managed financial profile, supported by a strong asset base, operational stability, and capacity for sustained growth. Governance and management remain key strengths; anchored by the Akhtar family’s strategic oversight, the leadership team leverages decades of expertise to steer the Company through evolving industry dynamics.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent upon TSML's ability to maintain its market leadership, sustain business volumes, and preserve healthy margins while achieving optimal utilization of production capacities. Equally critical is the disciplined management of working capital to ensure liquidity buffers. In the prevailing challenging economic landscape, characterized by demand-side pressures, TSML’s relative performance against industry peers will remain a key determinant of its creditworthiness.

Profile
Legal Structure

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML or ‘the Company’) is a publicly listed entity, incorporated in November 1998. Recognized as a prominent player in Pakistan’s sugar, ethanol, and carbon dioxide sectors, TSML has consistently demonstrated industry leadership. Having commenced production of its first refined sugar in 1992, the Company has since pursued a strategy of continuous expansion, solidifying its position as a key contributor to the country’s agro-industrial landscape.


Background

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) commenced its journey in 1992 with the production of its first refined sugar, setting the foundation for a series of strategic expansions. The Company established its first sugar mill in Faisalabad, with an initial crushing capacity of 12,500 TCD, followed by a second mill in Dera Ismail Khan (DIK) and a third in Muzaffargarh, each with a crushing capacity of 16,000 TCD. Further diversifying its operations, TSML inaugurated its first distillery in Faisalabad in 2008, with a daily production capacity of 125,000 liters, and a second distillery in Muzaffargarh in 2013, boasting a capacity of 140,000 liters per day. Additionally, Unit 1 is equipped with a CO2 plant, underscoring the Company’s commitment to integrated, multi-faceted growth within the sector.


Operations

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) operates from its corporate headquarters in Lahore, with key production facilities located in Faisalabad, Dera Ismail Khan, and Muzaffargarh. The Company boasts a total crushing capacity of 48,500 TCD, supported by distilleries capable of producing a combined total of 265,000 liters of ethanol daily. In the most recent marketing year (MY24), TSML experienced a modest decline in sugar production, with output reaching 332,388 M.T, down from 333,663 M.T in MY23, yielding a recovery rate of 9.12%. Furthermore, TSML’s operational capabilities are enhanced by a fleet of six storage tanks, which collectively offer a monthly storage capacity of 15,600 MT, facilitating the secure storage of ethanol and petroleum products.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The majority ownership of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is held by the Akhtar Group and its associated family members, including the Directors, CEO, their spouses, and minor children, who collectively control approximately 84% of the Company’s shares. Banks and financial institutions hold a marginal stake of around 0.16%, while the local public owns approximately 16%. Additionally, 5% of the Company’s shares are classified as free float, contributing to the liquidity and market presence of TSML.


Stability

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) enjoys a strong and stable ownership structure, with the Akhtar family holding the majority of controlling interests. This consolidated control ensures continuity in governance and strategic decision-making, fostering a stable operational environment. The Company’s ownership is viewed as resilient, with the Akhtar family’s long-term commitment serving as a key pillar of its ongoing stability and growth.



Business Acumen

The Akhtar family, as the sponsors of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML), brings a wealth of experience and a proven track record of success across a diverse portfolio of large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Pakistan. Akbar Akhtar Khan, with over two decades of leadership excellence, has played a pivotal role in steering TSML to its current stature. In addition to his leadership at TSML, he serves as the Managing Director of Superior Textile Mills Ltd., further underscoring his extensive expertise in managing and growing industrial operations at a strategic level.


Financial Strength

As of 9MMY25, Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) demonstrates strong financial resilience, with a substantial asset base of approximately PKR 52 billion and a robust equity base of around PKR 13.9 billion. This solid financial position not only underscores the Company's stability but also highlights its capacity for future expansion and strategic investments. The significant equity base provides a cushion against market fluctuations, while the sizeable asset base reflects the value of TSML’s operational infrastructure and long-term growth potential. This financial strength positions the Company well to navigate industry challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) consists of two Executive Directors and five Non-Executive Directors. The current composition highlights a need for enhanced independent oversight and greater diversity to strengthen the governance framework. The Board is chaired by a Non-Executive Director and is predominantly influenced by the Akhtar Family, with six Nominee Directors.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is predominantly composed of members from the sponsoring Akhtar family, ensuring a strong familial presence in governance. However, the Board’s expertise is complemented by a well-balanced mix of professionals with significant experience in the sugar industry, along with experts in business, finance, and legal matters. Mr. Ghazi Akhtar Khan, the Chairman of the Board, brings invaluable experience in both the sugar and banking sectors. In addition to his leadership at TSML, Mr. Khan serves as President of Lotte Akhtar Beverages (LTAB). His extensive background includes a senior management role in the International Banking Division of Toronto Dominion Bank (now TD Bank) and a managerial position at Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (now KPMG) in Toronto, Canada. Mr. Khan is a Member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honors) degree from the University of Toronto, Canada. His diverse expertise and global experience significantly enhance the Board’s strategic oversight and decision-making capabilities


Board Effectiveness

The Board of Directors (BoD) of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) is supported by four key committees: the Audit Committee, the HR & Remuneration Committee, the Risk Management Committee, and the Nomination Committee. Mr. Humayun Akhtar, a Non-Executive Director, effectively chairs both the Audit and HR & Remuneration Committees, bringing valuable oversight to these critical areas. The responsibilities related to the Risk Management and Nomination Committees are handled directly at the Board level, ensuring a strategic and comprehensive approach to governance. The minutes of all committee meetings are meticulously maintained, ensuring transparency and a thorough record of discussions and decisions for future reference. This structured committee framework reinforces the Board’s effectiveness in monitoring, guiding, and steering the Company towards its long-term objectives.


Financial Transparency

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) upholds a high standard of financial transparency through the appointment of UHY Hassan Naeem & Co. Chartered Accountants as its external auditors. The firm holds a satisfactory Quality Control Review (QCR) rating, and is on SBP's A category list, reflecting its credibility and professional competence. For the financial year ending September 2025, UHY Hassan Naeem & Co. issued an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements, further reinforcing the accuracy, reliability, and integrity of TSML’s financial reporting.


Management
Organizational Structure

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) operates with a well-defined organizational structure, where each department is led by a department head who reports directly to the CEO. The six key departments within the Company are Banking & Finance, Operations, Control & Maintenance (OC&M), New Projects, Sales & Trading (S&T), IT Accounts & Tax, and Export & Audit. All functional heads provide direct reports to the CEO, who is responsible for making strategic decisions. This streamlined structure, while effective in ensuring operational efficiency, also underscores the potential key-man risk, as the CEO plays a central role in the Company's decision-making and overall management.


Management Team

Mr. Akbar Khan, the CEO of Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML), has been with the Company for over 3 decades. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Business with a focus on Accounting and Finance from Wright State University, USA, as well as a Master’s in Business Administration from Ball State University, USA. Before returning to Pakistan, Mr. Khan served as the Chief Auditor at a respected accounting firm in the United States for five years. His extensive experience and leadership have been integral to TSML’s growth and success. The management team at TSML boasts long tenures within the Company, bringing a wealth of experience in both the sugar industry and their respective fields. Mr. Ahmad Jehanzeb Khan, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), has been with the Company for 32 years, further strengthening the leadership team’s deep-rooted expertise in the industry and financial management. This continuity and seasoned leadership underscore the team’s capability to navigate the complexities of the business and drive TSML’s strategic objectives.


Effectiveness

This long-standing association fosters a deep understanding of the Company’s operations and the sugar industry, allowing for well-informed decision-making and a consistent approach to driving growth and profitability. The synergy between the leadership and their collective experience in the sugar industry, finance, and operations is a testament to the team’s capability to navigate challenges and capitalize on emerging opportunities, ensuring the continued success of TSML.


MIS

TSML leverages an in-house developed business management software suite to streamline and optimize day-to-day operations. The bespoke ERP applications cover critical functions such as Finance, Procurement, Human Resources, Production, Sales, Laboratory Analysis, and Automation, ensuring comprehensive oversight and integration across all departments. The system is continuously updated to meet evolving business needs, with enhancements and maintenance managed by a dedicated Development Team. This proactive approach to MIS enables TSML to maintain operational efficiency, improve decision-making through accurate data insights, and adapt swiftly to industry demands.


Control Environment

Tandlianwala Sugar Mills Limited (TSML) maintains a strong control environment to ensure operational efficiency and compliance with established policies and procedures. The Company has instituted a dedicated internal audit function tasked with implementing, monitoring, and evaluating its control framework. The internal audit department conducts quarterly evaluations to assess the effectiveness of processes and adherence to regulatory and organizational standards. Its findings and recommendations are directly reported to the Audit Committee, reinforcing a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. This proactive approach to internal controls underscores TSML's commitment to governance and operational excellence.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s sugar industry stands as the second-largest agro-based sector in the country, comprising approximately 90 mills with an annual crushing capacity of 80-90 million MT. Despite its scale, the industry faces persistent challenges, particularly due to the Government-regulated sugarcane support prices, which are set based on farmers’ costs and often constrain millers' profitability. Sugar production increased at a CAGR of ~6.1% during MY20-24. Production during MY24 clocked at ~6.8mln MT (MY23: ~6.7mln MT), up ~1.3% YoY, while consumption also increased to ~6.4mln MT from ~6.1mln MT in MY23 (YoY increase of ~4.9%).The current MY24 season also reflects the lingering effects of flash floods, with a 4.7% loss in cultivated area. Despite these setbacks, sugar production is estimated to recover slightly to around 7 million MT. The Government’s continued support for exports is expected to provide a much-needed boost to millers, helping them navigate challenging industry dynamics and mitigate financial pressures.


Relative Position

Owing to numerous industry players, companies relatively have good market share. Tandlianwala Sugar Mill contributes ~ 5% to the total sugar production of Pakistan


Revenues

The Company generates revenue through a diversified product base comprising sugar, ethanol, and Top Gas. During the first nine months of MY25, the topline contracted by 6.0%, declining to PKR 30 billion (9MMY24: PKR 32 billion). The contraction primarily stemmed from lower ethanol export volumes, while sugar sales posted an estimated growth of 6.6% during the same period. Despite the volume decline, favorable price dynamics in both sugar and ethanol segments partly mitigated the topline impact. A geographical breakdown reveals that the local market contributed around 79% of total revenue, while exports accounted for the remaining share. Going forward, revenue stability is expected to be supported by resilient domestic demand for sugar and ethanol, alongside prospects of recovery in export volumes. The Company’s ability to preserve pricing power, enhance operational efficiencies, and maintain an optimal product mix across markets will remain essential in sustaining its topline performance amid evolving industry conditions.


Margins

The Company’s profitability margins depict a weakened performance during 9MMY25, reflecting cost pressures and a decline in overall efficiency compared to the preceding period. Gross Profit Margin fell to 13% (9MMY24: 15.6%) due to increased input and energy costs, coupled with lower ethanol export volumes. Consequently, Operating Profit Margin and PBIT Margin also moderated to 11% each (9MMY24: 13%), indicating reduced operational leverage and higher production overheads. Net Profit Margin contracted significantly to 0.9% (9MMY24: 3.2%) amid elevated finance costs, which rose marginally to 8.7% of sales (9MMY24: 8.5%), and a sharp escalation in the Effective Tax Rate to 55% (9MMY24: 27%). The Company’s cash flow generation remained positive though lower than the preceding year, as reflected by a Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO/Sales) of 7% (9MMY24: 11%). When adjusted for working capital changes, the ratio stood at -5% (9MMY24: -25%), indicating a relative improvement in working capital management. Return indicators weakened, with ROA reducing to 1% (9MMY24: 4%) and ROE to 3% (9MMY24: 10%), mainly due to subdued earnings and a decline in asset turnover (91% vs. 111%). Overall, while revenue growth remained positive, profitability was constrained by higher costs and taxation, underscoring the need for margin recovery and improved cost efficiency to support future financial stability.


Sustainability


The Company’s future performance will primarily hinge on the sugar division and the evolving dynamics of the sugar industry. This segment remains a key revenue driver, and its stability will be critical to the Company’s overall financial health. Meanwhile, the ethanol division is expected to maintain its steady performance, supported by consistent demand and pricing trends.High prices in the international market and opportunities for sugar exports are anticipated to support the Company’s topline growth. However, achieving sustainable profitability will require a strategic focus on reducing the leverage structure. Lowering debt levels will not only alleviate the burden of finance costs but also enhance net margins, further strengthening the Company’s financial resilience


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s working capital management reflected a moderate increase in operational inefficiencies during 9MMY25, primarily due to higher inventory holding levels. Average inventory days rose to 137 (9MMY24: 111), driven by a buildup in finished goods inventory at 114 days (9MMY24: 79 days), while raw material days declined slightly to 24 (9MMY24: 32 days). The increase in finished goods inventory indicates slower inventory turnover and extended stockholding periods, which could exert pressure on liquidity if sustained. Trade receivables remained negligible, reflecting continued efficiency in collections, whereas trade payables expanded to 26 days (9MMY24: 7 days), highlighting improved utilization of supplier credit. As a result, the Company’s gross working capital cycle stretched to 137 days (9MMY24: 111 days), with net working capital averaging 111 days (9MMY24: 103 days), pointing to higher working capital requirements. Leverage indicators showed improvement, as Short-Term Trade Leverage stood at 0.0% (9MMY24: -2.1%) and Short-Term Total Leverage at 3.2% (9MMY24: -0.1%), signifying a controlled reliance on short-term funding. Moreover, the Current Ratio strengthened to 3.8x (9MMY24: 2.4x), indicating sound liquidity coverage. Overall, while the Company maintains a comfortable liquidity position, the elongated working capital cycle underscores the need for tighter inventory management and improved turnover to support operational efficiency and cash flow stability.


Coverages

The Company’s coverage indicators depict a weakening financial risk profile during 9MMY25, reflecting pressure on cash flow generation and debt servicing capacity. The EBITDA to Finance Cost ratio declined to 1.5x (9MMY24: 1.7x), indicating a reduced ability to cover interest obligations through operating earnings. Similarly, the FCFO to Finance Cost ratio deteriorated to 0.8x (9MMY24: 1.3x), pointing to tighter cash flow coverage of financing costs. FCFO growth for the period contracted sharply by 55% (9MMY24: -10%), while the three-year average FCFO growth also turned negative at -4% (9MMY24: +17%), underscoring weakened internal cash generation trends. Comprehensive coverage ratios including FCFO and TCF to total financing obligations stood at 0.8x each (9MMY24: 1.2x), suggesting limited capacity to meet cumulative financial liabilities from operational inflows. The debt payback ratio turned negative (-0.5x vs. 0.5x), reflecting constrained repayment potential due to subdued free cash flows. Furthermore, the liquid cover ratio weakened to -6.3x (9MMY24: -4.8x), highlighting persistent liquidity strain despite available banking lines. Overall, the Company’s coverage metrics remain under pressure, emphasizing the need to strengthen cash flow generation, optimize financing costs, and enhance liquidity buffers to preserve credit quality amid elevated borrowing requirements.


Capitalization

The Company’s capitalization structure indicates an increased reliance on debt financing during 9MMY25, with total borrowings comprising 62.8% of the capital mix (9MMY24: 58.4%). The rise in leverage reflects higher funding requirements, which could elevate financial risk if not offset by improved earnings and cash flow generation. Short-term borrowings continue to dominate the debt profile, representing 84.9% of total borrowings (9MMY24: 97.5%), underscoring the Company’s dependence on short-term credit lines for working capital needs and exposing it to refinancing and interest rate risks. Interest or markup payable days improved slightly to 53.8 days (9MMY24: 64.9 days), indicating better payment management and liquidity discipline. However, the average borrowing cost rose considerably, with the spread over KIBOR widening to 16.1% (9MMY24: 5.8%), reflecting the impact of higher benchmark rates and tighter credit conditions. Off-balance sheet exposures remained negligible, indicating a conservative risk stance. Overall, while the Company’s capital structure remains manageable, sustained deleveraging and a shift toward longer-tenure financing will be essential to enhance financial flexibility and mitigate liquidity and refinancing risks.


 
 

Nov-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
9M
Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 14,447 14,819 15,262 15,540
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 33,075 26,740 15,545 16,358
a. Inventories 17,248 13,117 5,131 7,959
b. Trade Receivables 10 15 4 18
5. Total Assets 47,523 41,559 30,807 31,898
6. Current Liabilities 8,812 7,910 7,814 8,356
a. Trade Payables 4,839 948 618 197
7. Borrowings 23,681 18,906 9,509 11,700
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,030 1,031 886 776
10. Net Assets 14,000 13,712 12,598 11,066
11. Shareholders' Equity 14,000 13,712 12,598 11,066
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 30,302 38,312 42,290 32,300
a. Cost of Good Sold (26,251) (32,183) (36,617) (28,537)
2. Gross Profit 4,051 6,128 5,673 3,763
a. Operating Expenses (715) (1,167) (1,223) (1,098)
3. Operating Profit 3,336 4,961 4,450 2,665
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (44) 477 158 0
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 3,292 5,438 4,608 2,666
a. Total Finance Cost (2,653) (3,607) (2,459) (1,677)
b. Taxation (351) (748) (640) (471)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 288 1,083 1,509 518
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 2,052 6,123 5,091 2,984
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (903) 2,861 2,561 1,511
c. Changes in Working Capital (3,665) (12,812) 465 (722)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (4,569) (9,951) 3,026 789
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (195) (160) (55) (233)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 4,775 9,360 (2,606) (13)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 11 (751) 365 543
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 5.5% -9.4% 30.9% 19.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 13.4% 16.0% 13.4% 11.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.9% 2.8% 3.6% 1.6%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -5.3% -17.5% 13.1% 7.0%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.8% 8.2% 12.8% 4.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 137 87 57 81
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 111 80 53 77
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.8 3.4 2.0 2.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 1.6 1.3 0.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -0.6 0.2 0.7 2.7
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 62.8% 58.0% 43.0% 51.4%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 53.8 83.5 53.6 98.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 16.7% 22.6% 21.9% 12.2%

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

Nov-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Nov-25

www.pacra.com