Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Dec-25 AA- A1 Stable Maintain -
13-Dec-24 AA- A1 Stable Upgrade -
15-Dec-23 A+ A1 Stable Maintain YES
31-Jan-23 A+ A1 Stable Upgrade YES
15-Dec-22 A A2 Stable Maintain YES
About the Entity

Sui Southern Gas Company (SSGC) is Pakistan’s leading integrated public-listed natural gas utility. The Government of Pakistan holds the majority stake, with 54% owned through the President of Pakistan and 7.25% via the SSGC Employees Empowerment Trust. Mr. Muhammad Amin Rajput currently serves as the Acting Managing Director.

Rating Rationale

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (“SSGC” or “the Company”) is one of the two state-owned entities that hold an integrated license for the transmission, distribution, and sale of natural gas and RLNG. As the sole operator across Sindh and Balochistan, the Company plays a critical role in the national gas supply chain. Operating in a regulated environment, SSGC earns a guaranteed return on its net operating assets as determined by OGRA. The ratings reflect this strategic importance, alongside improving operational efficiency and a gradual financial recovery that is expected to strengthen over the medium term. During FY25, SSGC sustained the recovery momentum by posting a positive bottom line for the second consecutive time. The improvement was driven primarily by stronger operational controls and enhanced capitalization of PKR 37bln in FY25 against a target of PKR 40bln (FY24: PKR 24 billion), which directly supported regulated returns. The investments focused on network expansion, modernization, and system rehabilitation, with around PKR 29 bln allocated to the distribution network. UFG losses remain SSGC’s key operational challenge, driven primarily by theft, meter tampering, leakages, and system inefficiencies. For reference, OGRA’s benchmark for UFG is 7.46%. The Company claimed a UFG of 10.09% in FY25, while OGRA’s assessment placed it at 12.07%. SSGC has filed a Motion for Review (MFR) contesting certain aspects of OGRA’s determination, and an expected favorable outcome would support profitability. Balochistan continues to contribute the largest share of disallowed UFG, although it represents less than 14% of total gas volumes. Management remains confident that ongoing network rehabilitation and enforcement initiatives will further reduce UFG losses. FY25 also presented operational challenges, including a sharp decline in bulk business from captive power plants, exerting pressure on cash flows. The Company’s working capital cycle remains stretched due to delayed receivables from the government related to tariff differentials and various customer categories, while timely payments to E&P suppliers must be maintained. Liquidity pressures persist despite sizeable working-capital lines, reflected in a modest current ratio and a large current maturity in FY26 related to a one-year borrowing facility. Although monthly inflows are expected to support loan repayment, overall cash-flow flexibility remains tight. The long-term borrowings remain limited relative to the asset base. The Company continues to pursue diversification to strengthen income streams. Its wholly owned subsidiary, SSGC LPG Limited, reported significant growth in FY25, with sales rising to 112,830 MT (FY24: 81,376 MT). SSGC AE (Pvt.) Limited, focused on emerging renewable initiatives in the gas sector, forms a key part of the Company’s long-term strategy to diversify revenue sources. Governance practices have improved, as reflected in the timely publication of FY25 financial statements. The delay in 1QFY26 statements is due to pending regulatory decisions; however, the Company remains committed to meeting reporting timelines, supported by more predictable tariff determinations from OGRA. FY25 financial statements carry a qualified opinion owing to IFRS-14 implications and legacy receivable issues. With board elections scheduled for December 23rd, the Company expects the appointment of a permanent MD for a three-year term, which should support governance continuity going forward.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain anchored on the support from the Government of Pakistan and the likelihood of timely financial assistance when required. Continued improvement in operational performance, strengthening of financial discipline, and further enhancement of governance practices will be critical to sustaining and potentially enhancing the ratings going forward.

Profile
Legal Structure

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC" or "the Company") is a public limited company, incorporated in Pakistan under the Companies Act, 2017. The Company is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. Its registered office is located at SSGC House, Sir Shah Muhammad Suleman Road, Block 14, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, which also houses the Company's meter manufacturing plant.


Background

SSGC has a rich history dating back to 1954. It was formally established on March 30, 1989, following the merger of the Karachi Gas Company, Indus Gas Company, and Sui Gas Transmission Company. Today, SSGC is a dynamic energy provider, supplying natural gas to over 3 million customers across Sindh and Balochistan. The Company also operates through two wholly-owned subsidiaries: SSGC LPG Limited (SSL), A fully integrated LPG company that manages the entire supply chain from sourcing and import to storage, bottling, and distribution, ensuring a reliable and economical supply for its customers. SSGC AE (Pvt) Limited (SSGC-AE): This entity is focused on exploring alternative energy opportunities beyond SSGC's core gas business.


Operations

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGC) operates as Pakistan's leading integrated natural gas utility, responsible since 1954 for the transmission, distribution, and network installation of natural gas across Sindh and Balochistan. Functioning as a downstream company, SSGC sources gas in bulk from over twenty-four domestic and international exploration and production companies, distributing it through a robust infrastructure that, as of FY25, includes a high-pressure pipeline network exceeding 4,400 km and a distribution system serving over 160 cities and towns as well as 3,800 villages. Further strengthening its operational capacity, SSGC operates its own Meter Manufacturing Plant, producing G-4 and G-1.6 meters under license from Itron, USA, for both local consumption and international export.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

SSGC’s shareholding is majority-owned by the Government of Pakistan (GoP), which controls a 53.25% stake through the President of Pakistan, while the SSGC Employees Empowerment Trust holds 7.25%. Public sector institutions, including banks, development finance institutions (DFIs), insurance companies, non-banking finance companies, Takaful operators, Mutual Funds, and Modarabas collectively represent 15.92% of ownership. The remaining shares are held by mutual funds, directors, the general public, and other institutions, ensuring a diversified public float alongside strong sovereign backing.


Stability

As a strategically important public sector utility, SSGC’s extensive pipeline network and operations are considered critical national infrastructure by the Government of Pakistan (GoP). Given its essential role in the energy supply chain, the government’s majority ownership is expected to remain unwavering, providing a high degree of operational and strategic stability.


Business Acumen

The GoP, through its two primary gas utility companies, SSGC and SNGPL, holds a dominant combined market share of approximately 79% in Pakistan’s total gas supply. The Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division) oversees the government’s portfolio and policy formulation for the gas distribution sector. At the same time, the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) serves as the independent regulatory body, determining tariffs and enforcing sector-wide standards. This structured oversight reinforces SSGC’s entrenched position and operational framework within the national energy landscape.


Financial Strength

The GoP recognizes SSGC’s strategic importance as an integral part of the national energy infrastructure. Historically, the government has provided necessary financial support during periods of distress, a commitment documented in a letter from the Finance Division. This established and ongoing sovereign backing underpins SSGC’s credit profile, solidifies its going concern status, and mitigates the Company's standalone financial vulnerabilities.


Governance
Board Structure

As of June 30, 2025, the Board comprises ten members, including four Non-Executive Directors, four Independent Directors, and one Executive Director, structured in line with corporate governance best practices. The Company has scheduled an Extraordinary General Meeting on Tuesday, December 23, 2025, to, among other items, confirm the election of eleven Directors for a three-year term.


Members’ Profile

The Board of Directors currently comprises accomplished professionals with diverse and substantial expertise across the public sector, energy, finance, and governance. The Chairperson, Dr Shamshad Akhtar, brings over 41 years of experience in national and international development, having served as Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan. Independent directors such as Mr Muhammad Razjuddin Monem (oilfield performance), Dr Sohail Khan (oil & gas strategy), and Mr Ayaz Dawood (entrepreneurship and finance) contribute deep sectoral and commercial insight. Government representation is provided by Mr Shakeel Qadir Khan, Chief Secretary of Balochistan, and Ms. Saira Najeeb Ahmed, a senior civil servant specialising in energy and economic policy, while non-executive directors Mr. Shoaib Javed Hussain (insurance and risk) and Mr Zafar Abbas (energy policy) further strengthen the Board’s oversight capability. Notably, Dr Shamshad Akhtar, Mr Muhammad Razjuddin Monem, Dr Sohail Khan, Mr. Ayaz Dawood, Mr Shakeel Qadir Khan, Ms. Saira Najeeb Ahmed, and Mr Shoaib Javed Hussain are among the directors proposed for re-election at the upcoming Extraordinary General Meeting. It is anticipated that following the EGM, the updated Board composition will be formalized, and detailed profiles of any newly appointed members will be made available thereafter. Together, this experienced and well-structured board provides robust strategic guidance and governance aligned with the Company’s role as a critical national utility.


Board Effectiveness

The Board exercised active oversight in FY25, holding 25 meetings to deliberate on operational, financial, and strategic priorities. Governance is further structured through five specialised committees: the Human Resource and Nomination Committee (3 meetings), Finance and Procurement Committee (9 meetings), Audit Committee (10 meetings), Risk Management, Litigation, and HSE & QA Committee (1 meeting), and the Special Committee on UFG (2 meetings). Each committee operates under formal Terms of Reference, providing focused recommendations to the Board on critical areas including financial controls, compliance, risk management, and UFG reduction efforts.


Financial Transparency

SSGC, as a listed public sector entity, operates within the governance frameworks of the SOE Act 2023 and related codes. The company's financial reporting has received a qualified audit opinion from M/s BDO Ebrahim & Co. for the year ended June 30, 2025, due to unresolved matters, including receivables and IFRS 14 related accounting exemptions. While the company discloses these challenges as per requirements, its financial performance remains critically dependent on regulatory settlements and government support.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company maintains a comprehensive and well-defined organizational structure, encompassing key functional divisions such as Transmission, Distribution, Human Resources, Treasury & Finance, Construction, Procurement, Billing, Sales, Internal Audit, Customer Services, Technical Services, Planning & Development, Administrative Services, and Risk Management. Each division is further segmented into specialized sub-departments with clearly delineated responsibilities. These operational units are led by Senior General Managers (SGMs) and General Managers (GMs), supported by teams of qualified professionals. The SGMs and GMs report directly to the Managing Director and Deputy Managing Director (Operations), who in turn are accountable to the Board of Directors, ensuring clear lines of authority and effective operational oversight.


Management Team

The senior management team comprises the Managing Director, Deputy Managing Director, Senior General Managers, and General Managers, each contributing substantial technical expertise and industry experience to their respective functions. Currently, Mr. Muhammad Amin Rajput is serving as the Acting Managing Director. A Fellow Chartered Accountant and Certified Internal Auditor, Mr. Rajput possesses over 30 years of diversified experience in finance, audit, and management across the oil and gas, energy, manufacturing, and automobile sectors. Before his current role, he held the positions of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Internal Auditor at SSGC, and has served as Chief Internal Auditor at K-Electric and in senior finance roles at Zahid Tractor in Saudi Arabia. Syed Muhammad Saeed Rizvi continues as the Deputy Managing Director (Operations), having been associated with the Company for over a decade. An engineer by profession, he has held key internal positions, including General Manager of the Meter Manufacturing Plant and Senior General Manager of Engineering Services. Mr. Rizvi brings extensive hands-on experience in project management, product quality, development, and operations & manufacturing. The permanent appointment of the Managing Director is expected to be finalized following the constitution of the new Board. Overall, the management team demonstrates a strong blend of financial acumen, operational proficiency, and institutional knowledge, positioning the Company to navigate its strategic and operational challenges effectively.


Effectiveness

The management has institutionalized a performance-driven culture through structured assessment mechanisms and results-based accountability aligned with stakeholder expectations. This is supported by the implementation of rigorous performance-based criteria and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) across leadership, managerial, and technical domains, fostering continuous learning and development. Clear segregation of duties, well-defined reporting lines, and a disciplined hierarchical structure further contribute to operational efficiency and support informed, timely decision-making across the organization.


MIS

SSGC utilizes an upgraded Oracle R12 ERP system alongside an IBM Rational Focal Point-based Enterprise Project Portfolio Management solution, enabling centralized oversight of distribution projects with a focus on strategic value and UFG control. The Company also operates a comprehensively enhanced in-house Customer Care and Billing (CC&B) system, which provides a centralized platform for end-to-end customer management, billing, and claims processing.


Control Environment

The Board has instituted a robust internal control framework designed to ensure adherence to principles of probity, integrity, objectivity, and transparency in all stakeholder engagements. The Company continues to strengthen its technological oversight capabilities through the integration of Geographic Information System (GIS) and MAZIK platforms, enhancing real-time operational monitoring and network analysis. The GIS platform consolidates live data from rehabilitation projects and unauthorized usage, supporting improved gas supply planning and management. Furthermore, operational efficiency has been advanced through the automated remote monitoring of 50 Town Border Station (TBS) sites in Karachi, enabling more proactive control of customer usage and network performance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s primary energy mix remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, with natural gas and imported RLNG serving as the core components of the national energy system. Gas demand remains anchored in the power, household, and fertilizer sectors, which together account for the bulk of the country’s consumption. In FY24, total gas usage stood at approximately 25.4 million MT, reflecting a slight year-on-year decline, while 9MFY25 saw a further moderation as household and industrial demand softened amid constrained supply. Despite this mild contraction, the fertilizer and power sectors maintained relatively stable offtake, underscoring their limited ability to shift to alternative fuels. Domestic natural gas production continued to decline due to the maturing profile of key fields and limited new additions. Output fell to around 24.0 million MT in FY24 from 25.0 million MT a year earlier, and slipped further to 16.9 million MT in 9MFY25 versus 18.2 million MT in the same period last year. The steady decline in domestic production continues to tighten the supply landscape and elevate the role of imported RLNG, particularly for power and industrial requirements. Total gas supply in FY24 was recorded at roughly 32.5 million MT, a 5.5 percent reduction compared to the prior year. Local natural gas accounted for nearly 24.0 million MT of this supply, while imported RLNG volumes fell to about 8.2 million MT from 9.4 million MT, reflecting high international LNG prices and fiscal limitations. Pakistan’s regasification capacity remains anchored in the two operational LNG terminals—Engro Elengy Terminal Limited (EETL) and Pakistan GasPort Consortium Limited (PGPCL). On the distribution side, SNGPL and SSGC continued to dominate, supplying around 79 percent of total gas in FY24. Their network expansion during 9MFY25, including the extension of main and service pipelines and integration of additional towns and villages, highlights ongoing efforts to enhance system reach. Alongside these utility networks, an independent system also functions, supplying large consumers directly through dedicated transmission arrangements or virtual pipelines, including containerized delivery. Financial stress in the sector remains significant. A major contributor is Unaccounted-for Gas (UFG), which represents the difference between gas purchased and sold. UFG arises primarily from theft, leakages, and measurement errors, and directly affects the profitability of the utilities. High UFG, combined with declining domestic production, elevated RLNG costs, currency depreciation, and fixed capacity payments to LNG terminals, continues to strain the financial sustainability of SNGPL and SSGC. A further system-level risk for the Sui companies stems from the loss of business to captive power plants, which, despite being better priced and more easily recoverable, reduce cash flows by diverting high-volume industrial and power consumers.


Relative Position

Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) holds a 47% share of Pakistan’s total gas market, operating primarily in Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Islamabad, while Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGC) accounts for approximately 21% of the national gas supply. SSGC serves as the primary distributor in its licensed franchise areas of Sindh and Balochistan, with a customer base of around 3.5 million connections and a relatively predictable revenue stream across residential, commercial, industrial, and power sectors. Despite this, gas supply to the captive power sector has declined sharply in recent years, falling by nearly 49% from 210 MMCFD in FY22 to 107 MMCFD in the initial period of FY26, resulting in reduced throughput and lower contribution to overall revenue. A major operational and financial challenge for SSGC is managing high Unaccounted-for Gas (UFG) losses. In FY25, total UFG stood at roughly 10%, although OGRA determined it at 12% due to pending claims under the Motion for Review (MFR). The main contributor to UFG is Balochistan, where losses exceed 30%, despite the province representing less than 14% of SSGC’s total volumes. In contrast, Karachi is the best-performing region, with UFG around 7%. High UFG in regions such as Balochistan has led to a regulatory revenue disallowance of PKR 18.1 billion. SSGC has filed an MFR with OGRA seeking recognition of PKR 12.8 billion in additional revenue, of which interim relief of PKR 3 billion has been granted. The outcome of this appeal is critical, as it will significantly affect the company’s reported profitability and financial recovery.


Revenues

During FY25, SSGC supplied 789 MMCF of gas (FY24: 841 MMCF) to consumers across various sectors, including power generation, fertilizer, captive power plants, commercial, and domestic users. The share of captive power in overall demand decreased from 21% to 19%. The Company recorded Net Revenues of PKR 435,073 million (FY24: PKR 465,869 million) from the sale of Indigenous gas and RLNG net of taxes, along with tariff adjustments on indigenous gas and RLNG, which is a receivable from GoP under the provisions of the license for transmission and distribution of natural gas granted to the Company by OGRA.


Margins

SSGC was allowed a return of 21.25% (FY24: 26.22%) on its average net operating fixed assets, before financial charges and taxes. However, OGRA applies efficiency-related benchmarks such as Unaccounted for Gas (UFG), Human Resource cost benchmarks, provisions for doubtful debts, and other operational expenses when determining final revenue requirements, resulting in disallowances that directly impact the company’s profitability. In its Final Revenue Requirement determination for FY 2024–25, OGRA permitted SSGC a return of PKR 26,649 million, but disallowed PKR 18,135 million on account of UFG. The company maintained disciplined control over operational costs, including HR expenses, which remained within regulated benchmarks. Additionally, OGRA granted immediate relief of PKR 3,176 million against SSGC’s Motion for Review (MFR) claims totaling PKR 12,846 million, offering some regulatory support and contributing to operational efficiency. Nevertheless, SSGC’s profitability was significantly affected by the substantial UFG disallowance and a sharp decline in bulk sales. Finance costs, though reduced to PKR 12,143 million, continued to weigh on earnings. Persistent operational challenges in Balochistan, where UFG stood at 30.95% and accounted for 35% of the total UFG, further strained performance. As a result, SSGC reported a net profit margin of only 0.62% for FY25, reflecting sustained pressure from regulatory, operational, and regional headwinds.


Sustainability

SSGC's core sustainability strategy remains aggressively reducing Unaccounted-for-Gas (UFG) to improve financial viability. The company has achieved a significant cumulative reduction, lowering overall UFG volumes from 73 BCF in FY 2018-19 to 35 BCF in FY 2024-25. This was driven by massive infrastructure investment, including laying over 2,500 km of new distribution pipelines. However, challenges persist, especially in Balochistan, which accounts for 35% of total UFG despite representing only 14% of the business. While volumetric losses decreased, the provisional UFG percentage rose to 12.07% due to sharply declining indigenous gas supplies. Beyond its core gas distribution, the Company operates through two wholly-owned subsidiaries that support its strategic diversification. SSGC LPG Limited manages a fully integrated LPG supply chain, from import and storage to bottling and distribution, ensuring a reliable alternative fuel supply for customers. Meanwhile, SSGC AE (Pvt) Limited is focused on exploring alternative energy opportunities, with material developments expected in this area. This positions the SSGC group for future energy transitions and potential new revenue streams.


Financial Risk
Working capital

SSGC operates with a severely strained working capital cycle, primarily due to a structural mismatch in its cash flows. While the Company bills consumers regularly for gas supplied, there are prolonged delays in receiving payments from key government entities and bulk consumers, such as K-Electric and Pakistan Steel Mills, which are trapped in the circular debt chain. These delays result in extended receivable days, which averaged 108 days in FY25. Concurrently, SSGC is obligated to make timely payments to its own suppliers, including gas producers like OGDCL and PPL, and to meet other operational expenses. This cash conversion bottleneck forces the Company to bridge the funding gap through increased reliance on short-term borrowing lines to support day-to-day operations and meet immediate liabilities. As a consequence, SSGC's net working capital cycle remains deeply negative at -648 days, indicating that its suppliers and other creditors are effectively financing its operations for nearly two years. To sustain this structure, total borrowings escalated to PKR 137,300 million as of June 2025. Ultimately, the Company’s liquidity and ability to meet its obligations are not solely a function of consumer billing but remain fundamentally dependent on the realization of overdue circular debt-related receivables from the Government of Pakistan and other state-owned entities.


Coverages

SSGC’s financial coverage metrics came under pressure during FY25, driven by an increase in finance costs to PKR 12,143 million and a contraction in operating cash flow, which declined to PKR 7,673 million. This resulted in an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/Finance Cost) of 3.4x, while cash-based coverage (FCFO/Finance Cost) fell to 0.0x. Going forward, borrowing is expected to rise to support the company’s rehabilitation plan in the coming years. Effective financial planning and strict operational discipline will be essential to maintain adequate cash flows and ensure the company’s ability to meet its obligations.



Capitalization

SSGC has obtained both long-term and short-term borrowings to finance capital expenditures and meet working capital requirements. As of June 30, 2025, the Company's total borrowings stood at PKR 137,300 million, significantly higher than PKR 81,340 million in FY24. Loans under sovereign guarantee were PKR 4,666 million as of 1Q FY26 (PKR 5,833 million in FY 25). The Company’s leverage ratio increased to 94.3% as of June 30, 2025, from 93.2% in FY24, reflecting higher debt levels. Despite a net profit of PKR 2,689 million in FY25, accumulated losses continued to constrain equity, though it improved to PKR 8,268 million.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 240,702 215,980 196,761
2. Investments 454 257 152
3. Related Party Exposure 1,102 1,084 1,084
4. Current Assets 872,250 961,866 867,617
a. Inventories 3,215 4,037 3,445
b. Trade Receivables 130,924 127,448 118,245
5. Total Assets 1,114,508 1,179,186 1,065,614
6. Current Liabilities 898,326 1,034,201 946,902
a. Trade Payables 847,765 962,674 876,467
7. Borrowings 137,300 81,340 67,236
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 70,613 57,728 54,164
10. Net Assets 8,268 5,917 (2,688)
11. Shareholders' Equity 8,268 5,917 (2,688)
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 435,074 465,870 449,501
a. Cost of Good Sold (424,084) (455,487) (423,301)
2. Gross Profit 10,990 10,383 26,200
a. Operating Expenses (7,378) (7,185) (6,074)
3. Operating Profit 3,612 3,198 20,126
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 15,629 19,387 (13,098)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 19,241 22,585 7,028
a. Total Finance Cost (12,143) (13,375) (8,619)
b. Taxation (4,409) (2,371) (10)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 2,689 6,839 (1,601)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 7,673 35,874 16,760
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes (7,574) 19,937 8,062
c. Changes in Working Capital (14,660) (9,413) (14,398)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (22,233) 10,523 (6,336)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (33,358) (23,718) (12,681)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 10,624 10,254 18,638
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (44,968) (2,940) (379)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -6.6% 3.6% 19.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 2.5% 2.2% 5.8%
c. Net Profit Margin 0.6% 1.5% -0.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -1.6% 5.7% 0.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 37.9% 211.8% 22.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 111 99 92
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -648 -621 -521
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.0 0.9 0.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.4 2.9 2.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.0 0.3 0.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -36.4 6.8 18.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 94.3% 93.2% 104.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 70.1 90.4 825.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.1% 18.2% 15.4%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com