Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
23-Dec-25 A- A2 Developing Maintain -
23-Dec-24 A- A2 Developing Maintain YES
22-Dec-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
23-Dec-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited, incorporated in 1996 and listed on the PSX, is primarily engaged in manufacturing and selling tin plates, cans, and steel products. The Rafi Family holds the controlling stake, with ~39.61% shares directly and ~15.49% indirectly through Siddiqsons Limited. The remaining shareholding 45% is held by individuals and financial institutions. The Board of Directors, led by Chairman Mr. Tariq Rafi, consists of seven members: two independent directors, three non-executive directors (all representing the Rafi Family), and two executive directors, including the CEO. Mr. Rafi is a seasoned business professional with a track record of successful ventures.

Rating Rationale

The rating of Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited (“STPL” or the “Company”) is supported by a financially sound sponsor, whose sustained financial and operational backing has been instrumental in maintaining the Company’s stability and mitigating the risk of distress during periods of operational and market volatility. FY2024–25 proved challenging for the Company, with performance constrained by the continued availability of sales tax exemptions in the FATA/PATA regions, substitution of tin plates with Galvalume in food packaging, and low-priced imports of secondary tin plates, all of which negatively impacted demand and capacity utilization. In response, management undertook legal and regulatory measures, including filings with the National Tariff Commission, to protect the Company’s market position. To address these challenges, management formulated a strategy focused on driving business growth by managing exports to the U.S. market and reviving local sales. Accordingly, internal targets were set to improve capacity utilization and enhance profitability. However, the strategy yielded limited results. In addition, the CRC project faced significant delays due to non-delivery by suppliers, which led to an unfavorable international arbitration award and the recognition of a provision of Rs. 820.97 million for mediation. In this time of financial distress, the Sponsor remains optimistic, anticipating that successful mediation will safeguard the Company’s sustainability and support a promising future.
Amidst stated factors, the Company’s revenue declined by approximately 50% to PKR 2,023 million in FY25 (FY24: PKR 4,076 million), resulting in a net loss of PKR 255 million (FY24: PKR 2,058 million), while equity remained modest at PKR 907 million as of June 2025 (FY24: PKR 1,163 million), highlighting a limited capital buffer. The Company’s low-leverage capital structure limits financial flexibility and increases reliance on debt for ongoing project investments. Debt obligations are being met with support from its parent, Siddiqson Limited, supporting its credit rating.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent upon the sponsor’s commitment to provide financial support in case of any cash flow shortfall, particularly amid operational pressures, subdued market demand, and project-related challenges.

Profile
Legal Structure

Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited ("STPL" or the "Company"), incorporated as a public listed company in 1996, is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Its registered office is in Karachi, with production facilities located in Karachi, Sindh, and Windhur, Balochistan.


Background

The Company, established in collaboration with Sollac of France and Mitsubishi Corporation of Japan, commenced commercial operations in May 1999 and added a canning facility in Malir, Karachi, in 2009.


Operations

STPL manufactures and sells Electrolytic Tin Plates (ETP), cans, and other steel products, operating under a B2B model. Its tin plate plant has an installed capacity of 120,000 MT per annum, while the canning facility produces up to 4,015,000 cans annually.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The controlling stake in the Company is held by Rafi Family. The Family holds ~55% shares in the Company directly through individuals, whereas ~15% shares are held indirectly through Siddiqsons Limited, which is 100% owned by Rafi Family. The remaining 30% shareholding is held by individuals.


Stability

The Company’s controlling shareholding rests with Rafi Family since its inception. However, there is no formal succession plan in place.


Business Acumen

The sponsor family has strong working knowledge as they are operating in the industry since 1996 and are the only manufacturer of tin plates in Pakistan.


Financial Strength

The Rafi family has strong financial strength as reflected by a diverse portfolio of businesses. The sponsors have supported the Company in the past through right issue to fund Capex. It is expected that the sponsors will support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company has a seven members board comprising two independent directors, three non-executive directors and two executive directors (including the CEO). The board is chaired by Mr. Tariq Rafi. All directors, except independent directors, represent Rafi Family.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Tariq Rafi, Chairman of the Board, is also serving his responsibilities as the director on the Board of MCB Bank Limited, Centrak Depository Company, Siddiqsons Limited, Siddiqsons Energy Limited, & Canvas Company of Pakistan (Pvt) Limited. Mr. Rafi joined STPL since the inception of the Company. Mr. Munir Qureshi, Executive Director, is an engineer with a graduate degree in public administration from Harvard University. A certified director under the Code of Corporate Governance, he has been a member of STPL's Board since 2015. Mr.Ibrahim Shamsi, non-executive director, has vast experience of modern management and effective control management. He is the CEO of Aladin Water and Amusement Park, Karachi and Joyland, Lahore. He is also serving as the director of Adam Jee Insurance Company Limited, the largest insurance Company of Pakistan. Ms. Alia Sajjad, a non-executive director, joined the Board in 2018. She is the Executive Director of Siddiqsons Limited and serves as COO of Triple Tree Associates, overseeing the company's finance, marketing, and operational affairs. Mr. Abdul Wahab, Independent director, joined the Board in 2018 and has experience in business management. Mr. Muhamad Yousuf Adil, an independent director since 2023, brings 40 years of experience in assurance, taxation, and advisory services. He has supported the growth of prominent business groups including Sapphire, Nishat and Sitara.


Board Effectiveness

The Board met four times during FY25, with most of the directors attending four or more meetings. The Board has constituted three sub-committees: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) Human Resource & Remuneration Committee, and (iii) Technical Committee. The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr. Muhammad Yousuf Adil, the Human Resource & Remuneration Committee by Mr. Abdul Wahab, and the Technical Committee by Mr. Tariq Rafi.


Financial Transparency

Muniff Ziauddin & Co., Chartered Accountants, are the external auditors of the Company. They have issued a unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025, and have also highlighted a material uncertainty related to going concern. An emphasis of matter paragraph has been included to highlight the contingent exposure related to ongoing litigation. The Board has established an internal audit department to strengthen internal controls and oversight.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has established a well-defined management structure divided into functional departments with clear lines of responsibilities.


Management Team

The management team is led by Mr. Naeem-ul-Hassan Mirza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. An electrical engineer by profession, Mr. Mirza joined STPL in 1999 and has since held various senior management positions across key operational functions. With over 26 years of association with the Company, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited in 2022. Mr. Rashid Khaleeque is currently serving as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, having joined in August 2025.


Effectiveness

The Company has established two management committees to coordinate its operations, namely, i) Technical Committee, and ii) Procurement Committee. Technical committee is the apex management committee. The committees meet on requirement basis.


MIS

The Company has implemented Sidat Hyder Financials suit to manage the financial information needs of management. Further, the Company has implemented in house developed softwares to manage stock and stores. The management is also running a separate payroll software to process payroll data.


Control Environment

The management has a strong control environment. There exists an established internal audit function which includes three members including the Head of Internal Audit. The head of Internal audit reports directly to the audit committee.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The packaging industry comprises paper, plastic, and tinplate segments. STPL operates within the tinplate segment, encompassing both local manufacturing and competition from commercial imports. Currently, the Company is exposed to elevated business risk, primarily stemming from (i) sales tax exemptions in the FATA/PATA regions, (ii) import duty dynamics, and (iii) substitution risk arising from the increased use of Galvalume. The National Tariff Commission (NTC) has imposed anti-dumping duties on tinplate imports from China, South Africa, the EU, and the USA, which has provided Siddiqsons with some level of protection against unfairly priced imports. The imports of CRC (Cold Rolled Coil) have been volatile in previous periods. Since FY21, the imports have dropped from USD~140.7Mn to USD~69.1Mn in FY24. However, during FY25 the imports increased to USD~86.3Mn, a YoY increase of ~24.9%. CRC imports in Pakistan increased in FY25 due to weaker local production, strong demand from the packaging sector, reliance on imported CRC for certain grades, and constrained domestic capacity for flat steel. (Source: PACRA Research)


Relative Position

The Company is the only tin plate manufacturer in Pakistan and as per management representation holds ~40% share of the total market. The other competitors are various small commercial importers of tin plates.


Revenues

The Company’s revenue declined by ~50% during FY25, reaching ~PKR 2.0bln (FY24: PKR 4.0bln, 3MFY26: 639mln). This drop is mainly due to lower sales volumes, driven by reduced demand from the edible oil sector and increased use of alternative packaging materials. Volatility in raw material prices and subdued market conditions also impacted order flows.


Margins

In FY25, the Company’s profitability improved significantly compared to FY24. The gross profit margin turned postive at 11.0% (FY24: -1.4%, 3MFY26: 14.1%), while the operating margin also increased to 4.7% (FY24: -5.2%, 3MFY26: 11.4%). This increase was mainly due to increase in sales volumes. The net profit margin stands at -12.6% (FY24: -50.5%, 3MFY26: 1.4%). The Company reported a net loss of ~PKR 255 million in FY25, compared to a net loss of ~PKR 2 billion in FY24. Company received a profit of PKR 9 million during 3MFY26.


Sustainability

Siddiqsons Tinplate is undertaking a backward integration project through the development of a Cold Rolled Coil (CRC) steel complex with a planned capacity of ~200,000 MT. The project initially faced delays due to the original supplier’s failure to meet delivery timelines, which led to legal claims and counterclaims. However, the matter has now been settled through litigation.


Financial Risk
Working capital

STPL’s operational outlook for FY 2025-26 is cautiously optimistic, supported by stabilized raw material supply, improved local material quality, and a recovery in domestic demand following import restrictions. Strategic focus on exports, coupled with regulatory developments and easing finance costs, positions the Company to strengthen both domestic and international market presence. In FY25, the Company’s working capital position improved notably. Inventory days reduced to ~40 days (FY24: ~52 days, 3MFY26: ~29 days), mainly due to better inventory planning and improved raw material availability. Trade receivable days increase to ~21 days (FY24: ~10 days, 3MFY26: ~28 days), while trade payable days increased to ~49 days (FY24: ~24 days, 3MFY26: ~40 days). The net working capital days dropped significantly to 11 days at the end of FY25 (FY24: 39 days, 3MFY26: ~18 days ), indicating improved working capital management.


Coverages

In FY25, the Company’s EBITDA stands at ~PKR 118 million, primarily due to a little increase in profitability. The EBITDA-to-finance cost coverage ratio 0.4x (FY24: -1.7x, 3MFY26: 0.3x), reflecting the stable operating performance. Finance cost stand at ~PKR 383million in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 596 million, 3MFY26: ~PKR 64 million). As a result, the FCFO-to-finance cost ratio stay at 0.2x in FY25 (FY24: -1.8x, 3MFY26: 0.3x), indicating release the pressure on the Company’s ability to cover debt-related outflows from its core operations.


Capitalization

Siddiqsons Tinplate Limited’s gearing ratio increased to ~72.8% at the end of FY25 (FY24: ~64.8%, 3MFY26: 73.3%), primarily due to a reduction in equity. Total borrowings remained relatively decrease, recorded at ~PKR 1,049 million in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 1,710 million, 3MFY26: ~PKR 1,076 million). However, short-term borrowings decreased to ~PKR 969 million in FY25 (FY24: ~PKR 1,490 million, 3MFY26: ~PKR 995 million), reflecting low reliance on working capital financing. In FY25, short-term borrowings accounted for approximately 92% of total borrowings


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


Sep-25
3M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,335 3,342 3,379
2. Investments 214 214 265
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 939 850 795
a. Inventories 253 157 281
b. Trade Receivables 198 194 38
5. Total Assets 4,488 4,406 4,438
6. Current Liabilities 1,086 1,115 1,158
a. Trade Payables 275 282 265
7. Borrowings 1,076 1,049 1,713
8. Related Party Exposure 1,410 1,380 405
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 916 862 1,162
11. Shareholders' Equity 907 907 1,163
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 639 2,023 4,076
a. Cost of Good Sold (549) (1,801) (4,131)
2. Gross Profit 90 222 (55)
a. Operating Expenses (18) (127) (157)
3. Operating Profit 73 95 (212)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 10 58 (1,189)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 82 153 (1,401)
a. Total Finance Cost (64) (383) (596)
b. Taxation (10) (25) (61)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 9 (255) (2,058)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 16 59 (1,033)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 80 (257) (1,605)
c. Changes in Working Capital (25) (51) 1,284
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 55 (308) (321)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 10 59 440
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (612) 176 236
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (548) (73) 356
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 26.4% -50.4% -7.2%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.1% 11.0% -1.4%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.4% -12.6% -50.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -1.5% 0.4% 6.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 3.8% -24.6% -93.9%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 57 60 62
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 18 11 39
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 0.9 0.8 0.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 0.3 0.4 -1.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.1 0.0 -0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) -15.9 -9.5 -1.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 73.3% 72.8% 64.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 39.7 32.4 67.5
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 9.1% 13.9% 23.7%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com