Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
21-Jan-26 A A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jan-25 A A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jan-24 A A2 Stable Maintain -
31-Jan-23 A A2 Stable Maintain -
02-Feb-22 A A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Established in 1970, Zahir Khan & Brothers (ZKB) is a prominent player in Pakistan’s construction sector, undertaking projects across diverse segments of the industry. With a portfolio encompassing hundreds of projects, ZKB has delivered a wide range of construction work across the country. Registered as a partnership firm, ZKB is owned by four partners. The key founder and CEO, Mr. Zahir Khan, holds a 51% stake and brings nearly four decades of extensive experience and in-depth knowledge of the construction industry. Mr. Mohabbat Khan owns 41%, while Mr. Suleman and Mr. Samiullah each hold a 4% share.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect the established business profile of Zahir Khan & Brothers (ZKB or the Firm), one of Pakistan’s leading contractors with a long-standing presence in executing large-scale infrastructure projects, both independently and through joint ventures. The Firm is led by Zahir Khan and his family and has an extensive track record of working with international donor agencies, which fund a major portion of its projects. While such funding provides comfort against payment delays, it also entails stringent reporting and performance requirements. The Firm’s recent financial performance shows a marked increase in topline, with revenue rising to PKR 37,570mln in FY25 from PKR 20,851mln in FY24, reflecting an expanding project portfolio. However, the improvement at the operating level did not translate proportionately into the bottom line. FY25 profitability stood at PKR 4,803mln, which includes a revaluation gain of PKR 2,203mln. ZKB’s business model remains working-capital intensive. The Firm has traditionally relied on non-funded bank lines and supplier credit to meet its funding requirements, though it has recently started utilizing short-term borrowings to support liquidity. With an expanding order book, non-funded exposure is expected to increase further. While this risk is partly mitigated by the Firm’s sizeable equity base and substantial investment property portfolio, the evolving funding mix and growing reliance on short-term facilities warrant close monitoring. The Firm is also exploring debt market options to diversify funding sources, which may introduce additional leverage-related considerations. The Firm is actively pursuing geographical diversification across its business operations, with a steady pipeline of bids for new projects aimed at supporting revenue growth, if awarded. However, the Firm’s ability to commence and execute newly awarded projects, particularly large-scale and PPP initiatives, remains a key sensitivity. Delays in project mobilization or weaker-than-expected execution could adversely affect cash flows and strain the financial profile.

Key Rating Drivers

Management has initiated steps toward corporatization, including the establishment of ZKB Construction (Private) Limited. While these developments reflect a positive direction, governance and corporate structure remain areas that would benefit from further strengthening to better align with best practices. Along side this Financial metrics need to be upheld as well.

Profile
Legal Structure

Zahir Khan & Brothers (ZKB or the Firm) is a Partnership Firm established in 1970 and registered with the Registrar of Firms, Balochistan, under the Partnership Act, 1932. With a long-standing presence in Pakistan’s construction sector, the Firm has undertaken projects across the country. As part of its strategic vision to transition towards full corporatization, ZKB has taken an initial step by incorporating ZKB Construction Private Limited, a wholly owned corporate subsidiary of the Firm.


Background

Zahir Khan & Brothers (ZKB) commenced operations in the early 1970s as a modest construction firm in Balochistan and has since evolved into one of Pakistan’s leading infrastructure development companies. Over more than five decades, the Firm has expanded its footprint nationwide, developing a diversified portfolio that spans highways, motorways, metro rail and bus systems, public sector buildings, and large-scale industrial and infrastructure projects. ZKB has also demonstrated the capacity to collaborate with international partners through joint ventures, enabling the execution of complex and technically demanding projects. Throughout its history, the Firm has established a strong reputation for delivering projects efficiently, within stipulated timelines and budgets, while adhering to high standards of quality and professionalism.


Operations

ZKB specializes in a comprehensive range of construction and infrastructure services, encompassing roads and highways, bridges and overhead structures, residential and commercial buildings, canals and tunnels, water and irrigation systems, dams and flood control works, oil and gas pipelines, as well as industrial and prefabricated structures. The Firm is duly registered with the Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) and holds a ‘CA’ class license with a ‘NO LIMIT’ designation, authorizing it to execute projects of all scales across Pakistan. ZKB maintains a robust fleet of modern construction equipment; including pavers, power curbers, asphalt plants, bitumen distributors, transit mixers, rotary drilling machines, gantry cranes, straddle carriers, and milling machines, enabling efficient and high-quality project delivery. Its workforce comprises a core team of permanent professionals, supported by additional skilled labor engaged on a project-specific basis to ensure operational flexibility and responsiveness.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

ZKB is a fully family-owned business with four partners. Mr. Zahir Khan, the founder, holds the majority stake of 51%, Mr. Mohabbat Khan owns 41%, while Mr. Suleman and Mr. Samiullah each hold a 4% stake.


Stability

The Firm’s partnership structure has remained stable for decades, with no changes anticipated in the near term. Recent initial steps toward corporatization, including the establishment of ZKB Construction (Private) Limited, are expected to further strengthen the Firm’s long-term institutional stability. Nonetheless, the development of a formal succession plan would serve as an additional factor in reinforcing continuity and stability.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family has been in the construction industry for many decades. The sponsors possess a comprehensive understanding of the business, as they are actively involved in the day-to-day operations.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of ZKB exhibit a strong and well-established financial profile, underpinned by substantial equity contributions and a long-standing track record of supporting the Firm’s operations without reliance on long-term debt, thereby reflecting sound financial stability. The Firm has historically met its funding requirements through internally generated cash flows and partner equity, while the sponsors retain the financial capacity to provide additional support, if required. This solid equity base, coupled with the sponsors’ extensive asset holdings, including ownership of multiple properties across various locations in the country that may be offered as collateral, strengthens the Firm’s overall financial position and supports its ability to execute large-scale and complex infrastructure projects.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Firm resides with its four partners. In addition to the CEO, the other three partners also hold executive roles. The existing governance structure provides adequate operational oversight. Moreover, initial steps toward corporatization, including the establishment of ZKB Construction (Private) Limited, reflect a positive direction toward institutionalization. Nevertheless, as the Firm continues to operate as a partnership entity, there remains scope for gradual enhancement through the adoption of a more structured corporate governance framework, which could further strengthen operational efficiency and accountability.


Members’ Profile

ZKB’s governance and leadership structure is anchored by a core group of seasoned partners and executives who provide strong strategic oversight and effective operational direction. The Firm is led by Mr. Zahir Khan, Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer, who spearheads the organization’s long-term vision and strategic objectives, supported by nearly five decades of extensive experience in the construction industry. His leadership has been instrumental in shaping the Firm’s sustained growth, operational resilience, and strong market standing. Supporting him are experienced partners in key executive roles, including Mr. Mohabat Khan, Vice Chairman, who brings deep construction-sector leadership experience; Mr. Suleman Khan, Director – North, responsible for overseeing regional operations and driving project expansion across the northern corridor; and Mr. Sami Ullah Khan, Director – Central, who provides strategic guidance on project execution and portfolio growth in central regions. Collectively, the partners possess significant industry expertise, with three partners each having approximately a decade of hands-on experience, strengthening the Firm’s operational depth, governance framework, and project execution capabilities.


Board Effectiveness

Currently, there are no formal committees within the Firm. All partners hold management positions, which limits the potential for impartial oversight. However, the partners actively participate in the planning and execution of business projects and regularly oversee the Firm's operations.


Financial Transparency

M/s. RSM Avais Hyder Liaquat Nauman Chartered Accountants serves as the external auditor for the Firm. The auditors have issued an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements of Zahir Khan & Brothers for the year ended June 30, 2025, reflecting the Firm's compliance with applicable financial reporting standards.


Management
Organizational Structure

ZKB has a well-documented organizational structure with operations divided into seven key departments: (i) Bidding, (ii) Information Technology, (iii) Contract Management, (iv) Construction, (v) Admin & HR,  (vi) Finance, and (vii) Treasury. Each department has clearly defined responsibilities, ensuring efficient management and coordination across the Firm.


Management Team

Mr. Zahir Khan, Founder and CEO, leads the Firm’s strategic decisions, especially in bidding and acquiring government contracts. Project execution is managed by Mr. Mohabbat Khan, Director Technical Services and COO, with over 15 years of construction experience. The core management team includes Mr. Atif Iqbal, Head of Financial Reporting and Accounting, and Mr. Kamran, Head of Treasury, who brings strong banking expertise. Together, they ensure sound governance, operational efficiency, and robust financial management. Mr. Usman Khan, associated with ZKB for over seven years, initially led the real estate portfolio, completing landmark projects like Aura Square and MOI Shopping Mall in Islamabad. Currently, he serves as Director Urban Development along with Director Projects, overseeing real estate and infrastructure development.


Effectiveness

The management functions are clearly defined, enabling the Firm to effectively achieve its goals and objectives. The board members provide close oversight to ensure successful project execution and actively participate in the preparation of project bids. Regular management meetings are held to discuss Firm affairs; which are formally documented.


MIS

ZKB currently utilizes SARP (ERP/Oracle) software, which has been customized specifically for the construction industry. The software efficiently manages key financial functions, including tracking receivables, payables, general ledger, and accounts, providing the Firm with comprehensive financial oversight and control.


Control Environment

The Firm adheres to strict quality control standards, understanding their critical importance in the construction industry, particularly when working with international donor agencies. Additionally, ZKB maintains a comprehensive Management Information System (MIS) that enables the management to monitor activities across various project sites. While an internal control system is in place, ongoing reviews by the partners are essential to further enhance the effectiveness of management and ensure continuous improvement.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s construction sector is exhibiting a gradual recovery, supported by improved execution under the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) in 1HFY26, with utilization rising to approximately 21% of the federal allocation of PKR 1.0 trillion, translating into actual spending of around PKR 210 billion by end-December 2025. This marks a notable acceleration from 9.2% (PKR 92 billion) utilization through November. Infrastructure projects, particularly transport and communications, accounted for the bulk of spending, driving a 42% YoY increase in development outlays during 1HFY26. Despite continued constraints on non-PSDP development spending due to tight fiscal policy and IMF commitments, prioritized infrastructure projects continue to offer selective opportunities for construction firms. The sector contributed 2.27% to GDP in FY25, recording growth of 6.61% following a challenging FY24. Over the medium term, supported by urbanization, population growth, CPEC-linked investments, and rising hydropower demand, the construction sector is projected to grow at an average annual rate of approximately 4.6% during FY26–FY29, assuming gradual macroeconomic stabilization.


Relative Position

Out of the 10,000+ firms registered with the Pakistan Engineering Council as Constructors/Operators, only approximately 100 (1%), including ZKB, hold the prestigious 'CA' category (no limit) license. This license allows them to be included on the pre-qualification list of approved constructors. Additionally, ZKB's history of successfully delivering projects funded by international donors, along with its joint ventures with internationally recognized contractors, positions the Firm among the top-tier contractors operating in Pakistan.


Revenues

Driven by a strong project pipeline, the Firm achieved a top-line revenue of PKR 37,570 million in FY25, up from PKR 20,851 million in FY24 and PKR 11,207 million in FY23, demonstrating consistent growth. This revenue increase is supported by several major ongoing projects. With numerous projects in the bidding and prequalification stages, ZKB’s revenue is poised for further growth in the coming years.


Margins

In FY25, the Firm’s gross and operating margins declined sharply to 16.3% and 13.4%, respectively, compared to 26.0% and 22.9% in FY24. This contraction primarily reflects the project execution mix and stage of completion during the year, as construction margins typically vary across project phases, with higher upfront costs, competitive bidding pressures, and cost escalation being absorbed earlier in the project lifecycle, while margins normalize upon project completion and certification. Consequently, net margins also weakened significantly to 12.8% in FY25 from 42.2% in the previous year, underscoring the impact of compressed operating profitability amid the timing and nature of construction-related cash flows and cost recognition.


Sustainability

ZKB's management aims to establish a sustainable presence in the market by transitioning from a partnership to a corporate structure entity in the near future. As an initial step, the private company "ZKB Construction Private Limited" has been established. The Firm is actively pursuing geographical diversification across its business operations, with a steady pipeline of bids for new projects aimed at supporting revenue growth, if awarded. Notably, approximately 70% of the Firm’s projects are financed by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which provides a significant buffer against delays in fund disbursements typically associated with government-sponsored projects, particularly in the post-completion payment cycle. Additionally, ZKB is diversifying its business portfolio. The sponsors are entering into the sugar business after having acquired a sugar mill. Furthermore, the Firm has made strategic long-term investments through its balance sheet by purchasing shares in Flow Petroleum, Pak-China Fertilizer, and Mubarak Center in Lahore, further diversifying its business profile.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Firm primarily manages its working capital through customer advances, supplemented by short-term borrowing facilities. As of FY25, the total available funded facilities stood at PKR 2,650 million, with an overutilization of PKR 108 million, along with 72.67% utilization of performance guarantee limits. Operational efficiency improved during the year, as trade receivable days declined to 66 in FY25 from 114 in FY24, reflecting improved collections. Meanwhile, trade payable days decreased to 37 from 66, indicating faster settlement of obligations. As a result, the average net working capital cycle improved to 53 days in FY25, compared to 83 days in FY24, demonstrating a more efficient cash conversion cycle.


Coverages

In FY25, ZKB generated Free Cash Flow from Operations of PKR 3,638 million, slightly lower than PKR 3,960 million in FY24, supported by a gross profit of PKR 6,121 million. The interest coverage ratio improved significantly to 16.5x in FY25 from 9.9x in FY24, reflecting the Firm’s robust capacity to comfortably service its interest expenses.


Capitalization

In FY25, the Firm’s leverage ratio increased to 3.4% from 1.8% in FY24, reflecting a modest rise in debt levels. Historically, ZKB has maintained a conservative capital structure with minimal reliance on long-term debt. However, management has strategically incorporated short-term borrowings to finance working capital requirements. The Firm has fully utilized its short-term credit facilities, primarily through bank guarantees issued to secure project contracts. These borrowings are adequately collateralized by tangible assets, including mortgages on residential and commercial properties owned by the sponsors.


 
 

Jan-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 27,920 28,455 21,061
2. Investments 50,576 49,237 42,251
3. Related Party Exposure 6,454 4,565 2,708
4. Current Assets 27,304 25,632 20,394
a. Inventories 2,182 2,799 1,179
b. Trade Receivables 5,403 8,116 4,869
5. Total Assets 112,255 107,890 86,415
6. Current Liabilities 19,054 18,776 12,163
a. Trade Payables 2,978 4,542 2,960
7. Borrowings 2,865 1,440 1,788
8. Related Party Exposure 291 291 228
9. Non-Current Liabilities 8,401 9,328 6,339
10. Net Assets 81,644 78,054 65,897
11. Shareholders' Equity 81,644 78,054 65,897
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 37,570 20,851 11,207
a. Cost of Good Sold (31,449) (15,428) (8,215)
2. Gross Profit 6,121 5,423 2,993
a. Operating Expenses (1,077) (657) (448)
3. Operating Profit 5,044 4,765 2,544
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 2,222 5,706 8,456
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 7,265 10,471 11,001
a. Total Finance Cost (437) (575) (485)
b. Taxation (2,026) (1,100) (155)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 4,803 8,796 10,360
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 3,638 3,960 3,442
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 3,631 3,960 3,442
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,078) 42 (3,056)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 2,553 4,002 386
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 386 (1,647) (1,523)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (673) (1,980) 366
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 2,266 375 (770)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 80.2% 86.0% 21.3%
b. Gross Profit Margin 16.3% 26.0% 26.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 12.8% 42.2% 92.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 6.8% 19.2% 3.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.0% 12.2% 17.4%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 90 148 149
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 53 83 29
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.4 1.4 1.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 16.5 9.9 10.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 9.4 7.6 8.6
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 0.0 0.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 3.4% 1.8% 2.6%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 20.1% 48.5% 21.9%

Jan-26

www.pacra.com

Jan-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jan-26

www.pacra.com