Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
19-Dec-25 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
20-Dec-24 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
21-Dec-23 A- A1 Developing Maintain YES
23-Dec-22 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-21 A- A1 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Intermarket Securities Limited (“IMS”) was incorporated on September 27, 1999, and is a public listed company on the Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited since March 20, 2008. Effective July 1, 2024, IMS completed a court-sanctioned reverse merger with EFG Hermes Pakistan Limited, consolidating the operating platform under the IMS sponsor group. The Company operates as a full-service brokerage platform, providing equity brokerage, margin financing, proprietary investments, investment banking and advisory services, and equity and economic research. IMS is led operationally by CEO Mr. Wajid Hussain, who brings over 25 years of experience in capital markets, and is chaired by Ms. Erum Bilwani, sponsor and non-executive director, ensuring strategic oversight and governance continuity.

Rating Rationale

Intermarket Securities Limited (“IMS” or “the Company”) operates as a full-service brokerage platform with a track record spanning over two decades in Pakistan’s capital markets. The court-sanctioned reverse merger, effective July 1, 2024, consolidated operations under the IMS sponsor group, enabling the entity to preserve strategic oversight, operational continuity, and governance standards. FY25 represents a transitional six month period, while 1QFY26 marks the first normalized quarter under the post-merger structure. The Company leveraged a broadly stable macroeconomic environment in Pakistan, characterized by easing inflation (FY25: 4.5% vs. FY24: 23.4%), falling policy rates (20.5% → 10.5% as of Dec’25), and moderate GDP growth (~2.7%). External tailwinds such as rising exports, higher remittances, and a strengthening PKR supported liquidity and trading confidence at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX), creating a favorable backdrop for brokerage activity and market participation. Operational processes, including trade execution, settlement, and exposure management, are centralized and routed through NCCPL and CDC, embedding standardized controls and reducing operational and counterparty risk. Margin-financing receivables reached ~PKR 1.13bn, while trade debts stood at ~PKR 717mn as of 1QFY26, reflecting growth in client activity and effective collateralization practices. Proprietary positions increased to ~PKR 498mn (~29% of equity), aligning with elevated market turnover. Financial performance strengthened alongside favorable market conditions. FY25 operating revenue totaled ~PKR 644mn with profit after tax of ~PKR 155mn, improving to revenue of ~PKR 394mn and PAT of ~PKR 210mn in 1QFY26. Equity rose to ~PKR 1.71bn, supported by internal capital generation, while short-term borrowings of ~PKR 931mn financed margin-financing and settlement requirements. IMS maintains a cost structure largely variable in nature, with staff costs, clearing charges, and administrative expenses scaling in line with market activity, providing operating flexibility while reflecting the inherent cyclicality of brokerage income. In terms of market positioning, IMS operates within Pakistan’s brokerage landscape alongside larger diversified houses as well as more specialized market participants. While revenue remains concentrated toward brokerage-driven activity, the post-merger scale in margin financing and proprietary investments enhances the entity’s revenue-generating capacity. The Company’s medium-term strategy emphasizes client-base expansion, selective technology integration, and measured balance-sheet deployment, aiming to strengthen operational capacity and diversify revenue streams.

Key Rating Drivers

Continuation of the entity rating relies on sustained governance oversight, stability and depth of the ownership group, and disciplined execution across core operations, risk management, and compliance. Prudent capital deployment, vigilant liquidity management, and rigorous oversight of brokerage, margin-financing, and proprietary activities will remain central to preserving operational stability and financial resilience.

Profile
Background

Intermarket Securities Limited (formerly 'EFG Hermes Pakistan Limited') (the Company) was originally incorporated as a private limited company under the name 'Invest and Finance Securities (Private) Limited' on September 27, 1999, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (subsequently repealed by the Companies Act, 2017 issued in May 2017). On November 27, 2006, the Company was converted into a public unlisted company and, accordingly, renamed 'Invest and Finance Securities Limited'. The Company was subsequently listed on Karachi Stock Exchange Limited (now Pakistan Stock Exchange Limited) with effect from March 20, 2008. In May 2017, the majority shareholding of the Company was acquired by EFG Hermes Brokerage Holding LLC, a foreign entity based in Dubai, UAE. Following this change in ownership, the Company was renamed 'EFG Hermes Pakistan Limited'. With effect from July 01, 2024, EFG Hermes Pakistan Limited was merged with Intermarket Securities Limited (IMS), a public unlisted company, pursuant to a Scheme of Arrangement ('the Reverse Merger Scheme') sanctioned by the Honorable High Court of Sindh on October 09, 2024. In accordance with the terms of the Reverse Merger Scheme, IMS was dissolved without winding up, and the name of the Company was changed from 'EFG Hermes Pakistan Limited' to 'Intermarket Securities Limited'. The principal activities of the Company are investments, share brokerage, Initial Public Offer (IPO) underwriting, advisory and consultancy services. The registered office of the Company is situated at 5th Floor, Ext. Block, Bahria Complex IV, Ch. Khaliq-ur-Zaman Road, Clifton, Karachi, Pakistan. The FY25 financial statements represent a transitional six-month reporting period (January–June 2025) due to alignment of the financial year-end, while 1QFY26 constitutes the first normalized quarter under the post- merger structure. Accordingly, current financial and operational indicators are best interpreted as reflective of IMS’s standalone operating profile, rather than a blended legacy of the predecessor entity. As disclosed in the notes, comparative figures therefore relate to prior reporting period, and thus are not directly comparable.


Operations

IMS’s core operations are centered on equity brokerage, margin financing, supported by proprietary investments, advisory and underwriting services. The Company maintains a multi-location presence across Karachi and Lahore, operating from PSX buildings and commercial business districts, ensuring proximity to institutional and high-net-worth clientele. Brokerage remains the primary revenue driver, supported by active participation in high- volume market segments. Margin financing has expanded materially post-merger, as evidenced by a significant increase in receivables against margin financing, aligning with elevated market turnover and client trading activity. Proprietary trading activity has also scaled up, with a notable increase in short-term investments, primarily in quoted equity securities. Operationally, IMS functions through a centralized structure with defined front-office (trading, sales), middle-office (risk, compliance), and back-office (settlement, finance) segregation. The Company utilizes NCCPL and CDC infrastructure for clearing and settlement, ensuring standardized margining, exposure management, and counterparty risk controls. From a fiduciary standpoint, this reliance on market utilities materially reduces settlement risk and reinforces discipline in client-level exposure management. While revenue concentration remains tilted toward brokerage-linked income, the operational model benefits from scalability during periods of heightened market activity. At the same time, this exposes earnings to market cyclicality, underscoring the importance of risk controls, liquidity buffers, and capital discipline, aspects that are evaluated in subsequent sections of this report.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Intermarket Securities Limited (“IMS”or“theCompany”)ismajority-ownedbymembers of the Bilwani family.Asat September 30, 2025, Ms. Erum Bilwani and Mr. Muhammad Uraib Azneem Bilwani together hold a controlling stake exceeding 80% of the issued share capital. During September 2025, EFG Hermes Brokerage Holding LLC disposed of its entire shareholding in the Company. As disclosed to the Pakistan Stock Exchange, AB Holdings (Pvt.) Limited acquired 102,079,820 ordinary shares (approximately 7.9%) under a Share Purchase Agreement dated September 30, 2025. AB Holdings (Pvt.) Limited is a related-party vehicle in which Ms. Erum Bilwani holds ~30% ownership interest. Accordingly, EFG Hermes no longer holds any equity interest in IMS, and ownership is now fully concentrated within the local sponsor group and its associated entities.


The shareholding structure as of Sep 30, 2025 is as follows:


-Ms. Erum Bilwani: 43.07%

-Mr. Muhammad Uraib Azneem Bilwani: 41.38%

-AB Holdings (Pvt.) Limited: 7.93%

-Remaining free float.


Stability

IMS maintains a stable and concentrated ownership structure, with effective control resting with the Bilwani family. No material ownership disputes, or indicators of ownership instability were identified during the review period.


Business Acumen

The sponsor group demonstrates deep familiarity with Pakistan’s capital markets, supported by long-term involvement in brokerage operations, trading activity, and market infrastructure. This experience has enabled IMS to scale operations during periods of elevated market activity and adapt effectively to evolving liquidity and settlement dynamics. Overall, sponsor business acumen is assessed as execution-oriented, with demonstrated capacity to operate across market cycles.


Financial Strength

Sponsor financial strength is reflected through implicit support, market credibility, and demonstrated commitment to the business, rather than explicit guarantees or recurring capital injections. While IMS remains operationally and financially self-sustained, with capitalization and liquidity managed at the entity level, the sponsor group is viewed as financially capable and strategically aligned to support the Company’s growth trajectory, should the need arise. The absence of unsecured sponsor funding or structural related-party dependence limits contagion risk. However, given the lack of a diversified holding-company structure, the Company’s credit profile continues to be primarily driven by internal capital adequacy and earnings retention. Overall, sponsor financial strength is assessed as adequate, supportive, and available, though not intended to substitute for the Company’s standalone financial profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company’s Board of Directors (BoD) comprises seven members, which include three independent, one executive director and three non-executive directors. Ms. Erum Balwani, a non-executive director, currently chairs the board.


Members’ Profile

Board members collectively bring experience across brokerage operations, capital markets, trading activity, and corporate governance. Independent directors possess professional backgrounds that enable objective review of financial reporting, regulatory compliance, and risk oversight. No material gaps were identified in terms of functional expertise relevant to IMS’s business model. The Board’s skill mix appears sufficient for overseeing a brokerage franchise operating in a high-volatility, market-linked environment.


Board Effectiveness

Board effectiveness is evidenced through continued oversight of related-party matters, capital deployment, and risk exposures, particularly in the post-merger period. Key strategic matters, including borrowing limits, margin-financing expansion, and proprietary exposure, remain subject to Board-level review. To ensure an effective control environment and compliance with reporting standards, the Company has constituted two board committees: i) Audit Committee, and ii) Human Resource and Remuneration Committee. Both the Audit and Human Resource committees are chaired by independent directors, enhancing governance oversight.


Transparency

The Company’s external audit is conducted by Rahman Sarfaraz Rahim Iqbal Rafiq, Chartered Accountants, an SBP ''A'' Category firm. For FY25, the auditors issued an unqualified opinion. The internal audit function is in place and operates under defined reporting lines, supporting periodic review of controls, processes, and regulatory compliance. Financial reporting discipline is viewed as adequate for the scale and complexity of operations, an essential component of fiduciary reliability for a brokerage handling client assets and exposures.


Management
Organizational Structure

IMS operates under a functionally aligned organizational structure, with clearly demarcated responsibilities across brokerage operations, risk management, finance, compliance, research, and client servicing. The post-merger structure has localized decision-making authority, reducing dependency on offshore management layers that existed under the prior ownership framework. The structure supports timely execution, operational continuity, and regulatory responsiveness.


Management Team

The senior management team comprises experienced professionals with long-standing exposure to Pakistan’s capital markets. Management continuity post-merger has supported operational stability and ensured that business momentum was maintained during the transition period. Management depth is assessed as adequate for current business volumes. As the business expands, particularly in margin financing and selective proprietary activity, maintaining commensurate strength in second-line risk and oversight functions will be important to support governance effectiveness.


Management Effectiveness

IMS’s management framework reflects continuity following the reverse merger, with decision-making authority and operational oversight remaining aligned with the IMS sponsor group. Senior management demonstrates familiarity with brokerage operations, regulatory requirements, and market dynamics, enabling timely execution during periods of heightened trading activity. The organizational structure supports functional segregation across trading, risk, compliance, finance, and operations, facilitating internal coordination and control. Management responsiveness to market cycles is evident in the scaling of margin-financing activity and proprietary exposure during favorable conditions, while maintaining settlement discipline. While strategic execution remains largely volume-driven, sustained effectiveness will depend on the management’s ability to balance growth with risk controls, liquidity discipline, and capital preservation through market cycles.


Control Environment

IMS maintains a formal risk-management structure encompassing policies, defined risk appetites, and procedural controls covering market, credit, liquidity, and operational risks. The framework is supported by a designated risk-management function, separate from front-office operations, responsible for monitoring exposures and adherence to internal limits. Risk oversight is complemented by an internal audit function, which performs periodic reviews of processes and controls. While the existence of these structures indicates alignment with industry norms for brokerage operations, the framework’s effectiveness remains inherently linked to management discipline, especially given elevated trading volumes, increased leverage, and higher proprietary exposure observed post-merger. From a fiduciary standpoint, the presence of documented policies and segregation of responsibilities provides a baseline control environment; however, the evolving scale and complexity of operations warrant continued enhancement of risk reporting depth and forward-looking stress assessment.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s macroeconomic conditions remained broadly stable through FY25 and 1QFY26, creating a supportive backdrop for capital market activity and the brokerage industry. FY25 reflected a phase of gradual recovery, underpinned by IMF-backed reforms, easing inflationary pressures, and an improving external position. Real GDP growth was estimated at ~2.7%, supported by expansion in industry (~4.8%) and services (~2.9%), while per capita income increased to ~USD 1,824. Average inflation declined sharply to ~4.5% in FY25 from 23.4% in FY24, enabling the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to reduce the policy rate from 20.5% to 11% by the end of the fiscal year. During 1QFY26, stabilization momentum persisted, with average inflation easing further to ~4.2% and the PKR appreciating by ~0.9% on a FYTD basis. External indicators continued to strengthen, as exports increased by ~11% YoY to USD ~6.7bn, remittances rose by ~7% YoY to USD ~6.35bn, and foreign exchange reserves reached ~USD 19.8bn by end-Sep’25. Subsequent to the quarter-end, the SBP further lowered the policy rate to 10.5% (as of December 2025), reinforcing accommodative monetary conditions. While the transmission of rate cuts to risk assets typically occurs with a lag, the prevailing low-inflation and stable-rate environment has supported improved investor sentiment and trading activity at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Market confidence has also been underpinned by expectations of upcoming Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), signalling renewed corporate interest in equity listings and a gradual deepening of market participation.


Relative Position

IMS operates as an established brokerage house within Pakistan’s capital markets, competing alongside larger diversified peers. The Company benefits from a long operating history, a sound regulatory track record, and a meaningful institutional and corporate client base, which collectively support its competitive standing. Post-merger, business scale has improved, particularly across balance-sheet-supported activities, enhancing revenue-generation capacity during periods of favorable market conditions.While the revenue mix reflects a degree of client and product diversity, earnings remain predominantly linked to brokerage-driven activity, rendering performance inherently sensitive to overall market liquidity, investor sentiment, and trading volumes at the PSX.


Revenues

IMS’s operating performance strengthened materially during the post-merger period, supported by elevated market activity and improved trading volumes. During FY25 (six-month transitional period from January to June 2025), the Company reported operating revenue of ~PKR 643.56mn, and profit after tax of ~PKR 155.37mn, reflecting improved brokerage throughput under favorable market conditions. The momentum carried into 1QFY26, with IMS reporting operating revenue of ~PKR 394.08, and profit after tax of PKR 209.8mn, marking the first normalized quarter under the post-merger structure. The improvement was driven primarily by higher brokerage activity amid sustained investor participation. On the balance sheet, equity strengthened to PKR 1.71bn as at end-September 2025 (June 2025: PKR 1.50bn), supported by internal capital generation. Short-term borrowings increased to PKR 931.0mn (June 2025: PKR 534.3mn), in line with higher settlement requirements and expanded margin-financing activity during the quarter.


Cost Structure

IMS’s cost structure is largely variable in nature, aligned with trading volumes and market activity, which provides a degree of operating flexibility but also introduces earnings sensitivity during market downturns. Staff costs, clearing and settlement charges, and brokerage-related levies constitute the dominant expense components, scaling with transaction throughput. Administrative expenses increased during FY25 and 1QFY26 in line with higher business activity, expanded margin-financing volumes, and enhanced operational intensity post-merger. Finance costs remain linked to short-term borrowings utilised for settlement-cycle efficiency and margin financing; however, leverage levels have been maintained within manageable bounds. Overall, the cost base reflects a brokerage-led operating model, where profitability is supported during periods of elevated volumes but remains exposed to market cyclicality, a structural characteristic of the sector.


Sustainability

The Company’s stated strategic direction emphasizes expansion of its retail client base through improved technology integration, enhanced digital presence, and selective hiring to support system capability. In parallel, Company continues to benefit from the merger by leveraging existing institutional relationships and operational continuity, including those  historically linked to foreign transaction flows. Strategic execution remains at a developmental stage, with outcomes contingent on effective system enhancement, client diversification, and disciplined balance-sheet deployment. Over the medium term, the ability to translate current market momentum into a broader, more resilient revenue mix will be a key determinant of business sustainability.


Financial Risk
Credit Risk

IMS’s credit-risk exposure primarily emanates from its brokerage operations, including client receivables and margin-financing activity. Credit risk is managed within the framework prescribed by PSX and NCCPL, under which client trades are collateralised and subject to margin requirements and daily settlement cycles. As at end-1QFY26, receivables against margin financing increased to PKR ~1.13bn (June 2025: PKR ~554mn), reflecting heightened market activity and increased client participation. Trade debts reduced to PKR ~717mn from PKR ~940mn over the same period, partly offsetting the rise in margin exposures. While no material credit impairments were disclosed, the higher scale of margin financing elevates exposure to market-driven volatility, particularly during periods of sharp price correction. From a fiduciary standpoint, the Company’s credit-risk profile remains closely linked to market conditions and collateral discipline, necessitating ongoing monitoring as business volumes expand.


Market Risk

Market risk arises primarily from IMS’s proprietary investment activities. As disclosed in Note 8.1 to the FY25 financial statements, the proprietary book stood at approximately PKR 97.17mn as at June 30, 2025, representing ~6.47% of equity, and increased to ~PKR 497.9mn (~29.09% of equity) by end-1QFY26, reflecting higher allocation to quoted equity securities during a period of favorable market conditions. While the financial statements do not disclose formal hedging arrangements or net exposure metrics, the proprietary positions remain within the Company’s equity supported capacity. Inherently, equity-linked proprietary exposures introduce sensitivity to market movements; however, management has indicated that such positions are undertaken selectively, supported by internal investment discipline, sectoral diversification, and oversight at senior management and Board levels.


Liquidity Risk

IMS’s liquidity profile remained adequate as at end-Jun’25, supported by a surplus of current assets over current liabilities. At June 30, 2025, current assets stood at PKR ~3.07bn against current liabilities of PKR ~1.75bn, translating into a current ratio of approximately 1.75x. Liquidity buffers are supplemented by short-term investments and access to secured banking lines. During 1QFY26, short-term borrowings increased to PKR ~931mn (June 2025: PKR ~534mn), reflecting higher settlement and margin-financing requirements amid elevated market activity. These facilities are secured against pledged shares and subject to lender-defined margins. While liquidity remains supported by asset quality and funding access, increased reliance on short-term borrowings raises sensitivity to sudden market stress, reinforcing the need for prudent liquidity management under a fiduciary framework.


Capital Structure

IMS maintains a moderate capitalization profile. As at June 30, 2025, equity stood at PKR ~1.50bn, improving to PKR ~1.71bn by end-Sep’25, supported by internal profit generation. The Company’s balance sheet is primarily leveraged through short-term secured borrowings, with no disclosed long-term debt. The Liquid Capital Balance (LCB) amounted to PKR ~849.6mn as at June 30, 2025, remaining above regulatory requirements and providing a buffer against market and settlement risks. However, the combination of (i) higher proprietary exposure, (ii) expanded margin-financing activity, and (iii) increased leverage during 1QFY26 places greater emphasis on maintaining capital discipline as operating volumes scale up. From a fiduciary perspective, capitalization is presently adequate, though continued earnings retention and cautious balance-sheet expansion will be important to preserve loss-absorption capacity across market cycles.


 
 

Dec-25

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-25
6M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Dec-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Finances 554 641 135 114
2. Investments 265 355 304 840
3. Other Earning Assets 32 13 11 11
4. Non-Earning Assets 2,512 2,967 294 223
5. Non-Performing Finances-net 0 0 0 0
Total Assets 3,362 3,975 745 1,189
6. Funding 633 582 434 827
7. Other Liabilities (Non-Interest Bearing) 1,194 1,784 188 191
Total Liabilities 1,827 2,366 622 1,019
Equity 1,501 1,609 123 170
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Fee Based Income 560 874 31 116
2. Operating Expenses (436) (671) (56) (206)
3. Non Fee Based Income 131 396 36 115
Total Opearting Income/(Loss) 255 599 10 25
4. Financial Charges (35) (134) (33) (112)
Pre-Tax Profit 220 465 (23) (86)
5. Taxes (65) (62) (3) (15)
Profit After Tax 155 403 (26) (102)
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Cost Structure
Financial Charges / Total Opearting Income/(Loss) 13.8% 22.4% 325.5% 441.2%
Return on Equity (ROE) 23.4% 61.4% -35.1% -113.1%
2. Capital Adequacy
Equity / Total Assets (D+E+F) 44.7% 40.5% 16.5% 14.3%
Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) / (Financial Charges + Current Maturity of Long Term Debt + Uncovered Short Term Borrowings) 7.07 1.70 -0.37 0.10
3. Liquidity
Liquid Assets / Total Assets (D+E+F) 37.1% 28.7% 57.9% 79.4%
Liquid Assets / Trade Related Liabilities 1.17 0.68 2.44 10.28
4. Credit & Market Risk
Accounts Receivable / Short-term Borrowings + Advances from Customers + Payables to Customers 0.59 0.32 0.12 0.13
Equity Instruments / Investments 0.0% 12.5% 7.0% 2.5%

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

Dec-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-25

www.pacra.com