Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
07-Oct-26 A A2 Stable Maintain -
08-Oct-25 A A2 Stable Maintain -
11-Oct-24 A A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Oct-23 A A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Oct-22 A A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

Din Group, established in 1954 is a diversified Pakistani business group with presence across textiles, construction, and energy. Din Energy Limited, incorporated in 2014, operates a 50MW wind power project in Deh Kohistan, District Thatta, Sindh, which commenced commercial operations in March 2022. The project was developed under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006 on a Build, Own and Operate basis over approximately 325 acres and was financed through a mix of local and foreign debt. The project has a 25-year Energy Purchase Agreement with CPPA-G and a long-term O&M arrangement with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy and Orient Energy.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan’s renewable energy sector continues to progress under the Alternative and Renewable Energy (ARE) Policy, aimed at diversifying the national energy mix and reducing reliance on imported fuels. While projects benefit from sovereign-backed commitments and zero fuel risk, sector-wide challenges remain, including delayed payments from CPPA-G, macroeconomic headwinds, and regulatory uncertainties. Against this backdrop, Din Energy Limited, a 50 MW wind IPP established in 2014 in Deh Kohistan, Sindh, operates under a tariff arrangement awarded following NEPRA’s True-Up determination. Operations remain supported by long-term O&M partners Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (Pvt.) Limited and Orient Energy Systems (Pvt.) Ltd.
The Company’s financial and operational profile strengthened during FY26, supported by higher generation, scheduled debt repayments, and robust cash generation. Net delivered generation increased to 142.81 GWh in FY26 (FY25: 114.14 GWh), resulting in top-line growth to PKR 2,504 million compared to PKR 1,825 million in FY25. Liquidity improved, with the current ratio strengthening to 3.4x (FY25: 2.7x) and working capital days reducing to 72 days (FY25: 84 days). Capital structure risk moderated as total borrowings declined to PKR 7,621 million (FY25: PKR 8,850 million), bringing leverage down to 64.4% (FY25: 72.3%). Deleveraging progressed with cumulative debt repayments reaching 26% of foreign and 41% of local project obligations. Additionally, Din Energy Limited executed an Amendment Agreement with CPPA-G, effective May 2025, providing greater certainty around receivable settlements and introducing a revised delayed payment rate of KIBOR + 1%. The agreement caps the exchange rate on return components, though the major financial implications will come into effect after full debt repayment. The ratings also draw strength from the Company’s ownership by the Din Group, a diversified business group with established presence across multiple sectors, providing strategic oversight and sponsor support.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to sustain operational performance, maintain adequate cash flow generation and debt-servicing capacity, ensure timely recovery of receivables and continue prudent financial management. Continued deleveraging and effective management of wind resource variability will remain key to the Company’s financial profile.

Profile
Plant

Din Energy Limited owns and operates a 50 MW utility-scale wind power project constructed under a Build, Own, and Operate (BOO) concession structure across roughly 325 acres in Deh Kohistan, Sindh. Operating as a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP), the entity functions under the regulatory and structural provisions of Pakistan’s Renewable Energy Policy 2006.


Tariff

Din Energy Limited operates under the Cost-Plus Tariff mechanism determined by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA). Following NEPRA’s Commercial Operation Date (COD) tariff true-up decision, the project’s levelized benchmark tariff was finalized at PKR 7.9073/kWh (US Cents 4.4436/kWh) over its 25-year operational term from COD. Furthermore, the entity executed an Amendment Agreement with the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA-G), effective May 2025, which revised the payment and return frameworks to enhance cash-flow predictability and expedite receivable settlements. For the July-September 2026 quarter, NEPRA notified a revised applicable tariff of PKR 14.1352/kWh, incorporating routine indexation and exchange rate adjustments.


Return on Project

Under the regulatory tariff determination issued by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA), the project benefits from an approved Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 14.0% over its concession period.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership of Din Energy Limited resides with Din Group’s corporate vehicles and members of the founding family. Main corporate shareholding is divided equally between Din Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd and Din Ventures (Pvt.) Ltd at 31.67% each, alongside Din Industries Management (Pvt.) Ltd holding 5.00%. Individual sponsor holdings are retained by Shaikh Muhammad Pervez and Ms. Ghazala Pervez at 15.80% each, with nominal qualifying shareholdings held by Mr. Fawad Jawed, Mr. Farhad Shaikh Mohammad, and Mr. Irfan Muneer (0.00005% each).


Stability

Din Energy operates under the umbrella of the Din Group, one of Pakistan’s well established and diversified business conglomerates. With a legacy spanning several decades, the Group has successfully expanded into the renewable energy sector with a clear focus on sustainable development. Its ventures in clean energy are backed by extensive business experience and in-depth sector knowledge, lending credibility and operational stability to Din Energy’s initiatives.


Business Acumen

The leadership team of Din Energy comprises seasoned entrepreneurs and professionals who bring decades of hands-on experience across diverse industries. Individuals such as Shaikh Mohammad Pervez, Fawad Jawed, Farhad Shaikh Mohammad, and Ghazala Pervez have held key leadership positions across textiles, energy and real estate. Their collective strategic insight, corporate governance capabilities, and track record of successfully running multiple enterprises speak to the Group's strong business acumen.


Financial Strength

The financial standing of Din Energy is reinforced by the robust and diversified business portfolio of its sponsors. The Din Group has established successful operations across high-value industries, which enables the company to ensure long-term financial sustainability and resilience. The Group’s proven ability to fund and support large-scale projects underlines its solid financial foundation.


Governance
Board Structure

Din Energy Limited is governed by a four-member Board of Directors, inclusive of the Chief Executive Officer. The board composition consists entirely of members associated with the founding family, who concurrently serve in executive capacities across other Din Group companies. This direct sponsorship oversight provides unified strategic direction, streamlined decision-making processes, and institutional continuity.


Members’ Profile

Din Energy Limited benefits from a highly experienced Board of Directors whose members hold extensive tenure within Din Group. Bringing multidisciplinary expertise spanning energy, textile manufacturing, and real estate development, the directors offer a balanced mix of operational acumen, strategic vision, and formal business qualifications. This depth of industry knowledge ensures sound strategic guidance and institutional stewardship for the company.


Board Effectiveness

Din Energy Limited operates under a structured governance framework, with the Board maintaining periodic oversight through regular meetings to deliberate on core operational performance, financial strategy, regulatory compliance, and enterprise risk management. The directors' active executive involvement across the broader Din Group portfolio ensures informed oversight, strong strategic grounding, and agile decision-making tailored to prevailing market dynamics.


Financial Transparency

Din Energy Limited’s financial statements for the financial year ended June 30, 2026, were audited by BDO Ebrahim & Co., Chartered Accountants, an audit firm maintaining an ‘A’ category rating on the State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) Panel of Auditors. The independent auditors issued an unqualified audit opinion, confirming the accuracy, transparency, and regulatory compliance of the company’s financial disclosures.


Management
Organizational Structure

Din Energy Limited maintains a lean organizational structure characteristic of utility-scale Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The company retains direct management oversight over core financial, commercial, and regulatory functions, while outsourcing routine plant operations and maintenance (O&M) to specialized third-party contractors. This operational model optimizes overhead costs, enforces strict risk mitigation, and leverages specialized technical expertise without straining internal resource capacity.


Management Team

The company’s day-to-day operations are overseen by Mr. Farhad Shaikh Mohammad, who has played a central role in directing the company's strategic and operational priorities. He is supported by Mr. Mansoor Khan, an experienced project head with expertise in managing large-scale infrastructure and energy projects. Together, they are backed by a capable management team that brings a strong blend of technical knowledge, project execution skills, and leadership continuity to the organization.


Effectiveness

Operating under a disciplined management framework, Din Energy Limited prioritizes streamlined decision-making and efficient process workflows. Backed by strong internal controls and governance policies, the executive team maintains high standards of operational rigor and execution capabilities across key organizational streams.


Control Environment

To support operational excellence and robust governance, Din Energy Limited leverages an advanced IT infrastructure centered on an integrated SAP ERP system. This enterprise solution streamlines cross-functional workflows, enhances real-time performance tracking, and reinforces internal controls by maintaining strict data accuracy across financial, and operational streams.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

Din Energy Limited was developed pursuant to the framework of Pakistan’s Renewable Energy Policy 2006. The project’s commercial off-take is secured via a 25-year Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) executed with the Central Power Purchasing Agency (CPPA-G), establishing a long-term commitment for energy evacuation. In May 2025, the company executed an Amendment Agreement with CPPA-G aimed at restructuring the payment and return framework to provide enhanced certainty regarding receivable settlements. Under the terms of the amendment, the exchange rate indexation applicable to the Return on Equity (ROE) will be capped post-debt servicing, and the Delayed Payment Markup (DPM) rate has been revised to KIBOR + 1.0%.


Operation and Maintenance

To ensure optimal operational performance, Din Energy Limited secured a multi-year Operations and Maintenance (O&M) contract commencing March 27, 2024. The agreement is partnered with leading original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy alongside Orient Energy, delivering expert technical management, preventative maintenance, and operational reliability for the wind power facility.


Resource Risk

Wind resource risk, as defined under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, pertains to the variability in wind speed. According to the EPA, the Developer assumes responsibility for wind-related risks and any losses arising from such variations. However, in the event of curtailment by the power purchaser, the plant is entitled to receive NPMVs (Non project missed values) compensation based on estimated power generation.


Insurance Cover

DIN Energy has secured insurance coverage with Adamjee Insurance for all operational risks, business interruption, third-party liabilities, and property damage, ensuring comprehensive protection throughout the operations.


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

In Mar'26, Pakistan's total power generation rose to 8,939 GWh, reflecting a strong YoY increase of 6.3% from 8,409 GWh in Mar'25, and a MoM increase of 16.2% from 7,696 GWh in Feb'26 (largely seasonal). For 9MFY26, cumulative generation reached 93,131 GWh, up 3.3% YoY. Generation exceeded the NEPRA reference level during the month attributed to lower industrial tariffs, a shift of industrial consumers back onto the national grid, incremental consumption packages for industrial and agricultural users, and improved economic activity (LSM up 5.9% YoY in 8MFY26) and in fact marked the third-highest March output on record. The generation mix shifted notably: hydel generation surged 62.3% YoY to 2,105 GWh (24% share, up from 15% in Mar'25), driven by higher demand and reduced RLNG/nuclear output; imported coal jumped 126% YoY to 1,234 GWh (14% share, up from 6%); local coal rose 8% YoY to 1,498 GWh (17% share); wind generation increased 34% YoY to 309 GWh (3% share); while RLNG-based generation fell sharply by 67% YoY to just 504 GWh (6% share, down from 18%) amid supply disruptions linked to the US-Iran conflict, with only 2 of 8 scheduled cargoes imported. Nuclear generation declined 11.7% YoY to 1,962 GWh (22% share, down from 26%), likely due to annual technical outages at Chashma-III and KANUPP (K-3). Solar output edged down 12% YoY to 106 GWh (1% share), while RFO output rose sharply (up 23x YoY, from a very low base) and gas rose modestly (+4% YoY to 1,014 GWh). On the cost side, the adjusted fuel cost in Mar'26 stood at PKR 8.26/kWh, slightly above the NEPRA reference cost of PKR 8.00/kWh, resulting in a modest positive Fuel Charges Adjustment (FCA) of PKR 0.27/kWh, kept low by a comparatively favourable energy mix despite elevated oil prices. Notably, the March power generation cost itself was down 14.6% YoY, from PKR 9.46/kWh in Mar'25 to PKR 8.08/kWh in Mar'26. Generation trends from Dec'25-Mar'26 point to improving grid stability and a better outlook for future quarterly tariff adjustments, aided by lower industrial tariffs and higher levies on captive gas, though risks remain from prolonged RLNG disruptions tied to the US-Iran conflict, which could push FCAs and tariffs higher or trigger load shedding. NEPRA projects overall power demand to grow by 1.0% YoY in CY26.


Generation

In FY26, Din Energy Limited’s net delivered energy increased to 142.81 GWh, reflecting a 25.1% YoY recovery from 114.14 GWh recorded in FY25. The operational surge was driven by favorable wind resource availability and higher plant capacity utilization across key operational months. Concurrently, top-line revenue expanded to PKR 2,504 million, representing a 37.2% YoY growth compared to PKR 1,825 million in the preceding year.


Performance Benchmark

The Power Purchase Agreement specifies performance benchmarks for the Company, including an annual generation target of 166.440 GWh and a capacity factor of 38%.


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

Din Energy’s financing structure remains predominantly debt-funded, although leverage has improved during FY26. Total borrowings stood at PKR 7.62 billion (FY25: PKR 8.85 billion), reflecting scheduled repayment of project-related debt, while shareholders’ equity increased to PKR 4.21 billion (FY25: PKR 3.38 billion). The financing structure continues to reflect the capital-intensive nature of the wind IPP, with debt comprising the majority of the funding base; however, the reduction in borrowings alongside strengthening equity indicates gradual improvement in the overall financial structure.


Liquidity Profile

Din Energy’s liquidity profile strengthened during FY26, with the current ratio improving to 3.4 (FY25: 2.7), supported by an increase in current assets to PKR 957 million (PKR 658 million) against current liabilities of PKR 281 million (FY25: PKR 242 million). Trade receivables increased to PKR 824 million (PKR 571 million), making timely recovery from the power purchaser an important liquidity monitorable. Nevertheless, the company’s strong operating cash generation and improved current asset coverage provide adequate support for its near-term obligations.


Working Capital Financing

As a renewable IPP, Din Energy has relatively limited working-capital requirements as it does not incur fuel costs, with funding needs primarily associated with O&M expenses and the timing of receivable collections. Net working capital stood at 72 days in FY26 (FY25: 84 days), indicating an improvement in the working-capital cycle. The company continues to meet its operational working-capital requirements through internal cash generation, with the improvement in working-capital days providing some relief to liquidity requirements.


Cash Flow Analysis

Din Energy’s cash flow generation improved significantly during FY26, with FCFO rising to PKR 2.01 billion (PKR 1.35 billion), supported by stronger operating cash generation. Despite the higher FCFO, the company continues to face sizeable finance and debt-servicing requirements, with FCFO coverage of finance cost and current maturities improving to 1.3x (FY25: 0.8x). Overall, stronger cash generation and continued debt repayments are positive for the company’s financial flexibility.


Capitalization

Din Energy Limited’s capitalization profile strengthened during FY26, evidenced by a notable decline in leveraging to 64.4% from 72.3% in FY25. Total borrowings contracted to PKR 7.62 billion (FY25: PKR 8.85 billion), while shareholders’ equity expanded to PKR 4.21 billion (FY25: PKR 3.38 billion). Although the capital structure remains leveraged inherent to the capital-intensive nature of project-financed IPPs, ongoing debt servicing and equity accumulation are projected to drive progressive balance-sheet strengthening.


 
 

Oct-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Audited Auidted Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,162 11,822 12,225
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 957 658 705
a. Inventories 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 824 571 611
5. Total Assets 12,119 12,480 12,930
6. Current Liabilities 281 242 180
a. Trade Payables 187 216 129
7. Borrowings 7,621 8,850 9,437
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 5 3 8
10. Net Assets 4,212 3,385 3,306
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,212 3,385 3,306
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 2,504 1,825 2,313
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,016) (1,000) (996)
2. Gross Profit 1,488 824 1,317
a. Operating Expenses (33) (23) (25)
3. Operating Profit 1,455 801 1,292
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 13 24 49
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,469 825 1,340
a. Total Finance Cost (636) (740) (859)
b. Taxation (4) (6) (8)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 829 80 473
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 2,007 1,349 1,866
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,391 630 1,028
c. Changes in Working Capital (236) 119 (446)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,155 749 582
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 2 (22) 2
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (1,134) (715) (1,010)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 23 13 (426)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 37.2% -21.1% 16.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 59.4% 45.2% 56.9%
c. Net Profit Margin 33.1% 4.4% 20.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 70.7% 80.5% 61.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 19.4% 2.3% 13.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 102 118 110
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 72 84 45
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 3.4 2.7 3.9
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.2 1.9 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.3 0.8 1.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 5.5 14.1 9.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 64.4% 72.3% 74.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 7.6% 8.0% 8.4%

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-26

www.pacra.com