Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Oct-26 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
09-Oct-25 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
11-Oct-24 BBB+ A2 Positive Maintain -
12-Oct-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
12-Oct-22 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
About the Entity

HCS was established in 2009 and has since earned a distinguished position in Pakistan's construction industry as a pioneer of the "Fast Track" project execution culture. Notable projects include the Lahore Ring Road, the 2x2.5 MW hydel power project at Chashma, the 17-storey Bahria Grand Hotel, civil works at Benazir Bhutto International Airport, the Beijing Underpass and the Kalma Chowk underpass and overhead bridge in Lahore, and the Metro Bus projects in Islamabad, Lahore and Faisalabad. The Company has recently extended into finishing works, completing the CBD Lahore project, including the sourcing and installation of digital screens. The CEO, Mr. Shahid Saleem, is widely regarded as the driving force behind its success. Overall control vests with a three-member Board of Directors (BoD), all in executive positions, with no independent director.

Rating Rationale

Habib Construction Services Limited ("HCS" or "the Company") has established a well-entrenched position in Pakistan's construction industry since 2009, underpinned by a consistent record of disciplined and timely project execution. Its portfolio spans expressways, ring roads, flyovers and underpasses, airport and terminal facilities, mass transit corridors, and high-rise commercial and hospitality developments, for public and private sector clients. The Company pursues large-scale infrastructure packages in collaboration with local and foreign joint venture partners. HCS has also expanded into finishing works, having completed the CBD Lahore project, including the sourcing and installation of digital screens, thereby diversifying its revenue streams. The upgrade reflects the Company's resilient business profile, with revenue sustained at its historical peak over the past three years and expected to remain broadly stable, supporting the reinstatement of its originally assigned rating. As of 1QFY27, the Company has eight projects in hand, notably the EPC contract for the Malir Expressway, two infrastructure packages at NSIT Phase-I, and institutional and green building works in Lahore, the majority of which are at an advanced stage and due for completion by end-CY26. The most recent addition is the Faisalabad Orange Line mass transit project (11.1 km, KM RD 9+200 to 20+300), undertaken as a subcontract from FWO, with contractual guarantees retained by the principal contractor. The project accounts for the bulk of the order book, is at a nascent stage of execution, and is targeted for completion by mid-CY27. As contracts are awarded through competitive bidding, revenue visibility remains contingent on the Company's ability to secure new mandates, while the sector remains exposed to funding, cost-escalation and payment-timing risks. In FY26, the Company's combined revenue, including JV contributions, remained broadly stable at PKR 17.6bln (FY25: PKR 19.2bln), as lower direct revenue of PKR 9.4bln (FY25: PKR 12.6bln) was partly offset by higher JV revenue of PKR 8.2bln (FY25: PKR 6.6bln). Gross and net margins improved to 16.1% (FY25: 11.3%) and 8.0% (FY25: 3.9%), underscoring the Company's selective bidding strategy, under which opportunities are pursued based on return potential. The Company maintains a conservative financial profile, with borrowings of PKR 151mln, entirely short-term running finance, translating into gearing of 2.1% against an equity base of PKR 7.1bln. Nevertheless, unfunded exposures remain material, in line with the inherent requirements of the construction sector, particularly for performance guarantees and other contractual commitments.

Key Rating Drivers

The rating remains sensitive to the timely execution of ongoing and recently awarded projects and the release of funds in line with project requirements, as any delays could elongate the working capital cycle. Sustaining the upgraded rating will further depend on the Company's ability to replenish its order book with fresh awards as existing contracts mature, thereby preserving and progressively strengthening the current revenue base while maintaining stable margins. Prevailing industry dynamics, particularly the pace of public sector development spending, the regularity of receipts from contracting authorities and the trajectory of input costs, will remain key monitorables. Corporate governance also warrants attention, as the Board comprises solely executive directors with no independent representation, leaving room to strengthen the oversight framework.

Profile
Legal Structure

Habib Construction Services Limited (‘‘the Company’’ or ‘‘HCS’’) was incorporated in 2009 and subsequently converted into a Public Limited (Unlisted) Company on July 15, 2016. The registered office of the Company is located at 15-A, G-1, Johar Town, near Doctor’s Hospital, Lahore.


Background

HCS was incorporated by a group of experienced industry professionals. Within six months, the Company achieved the prestigious C-A (No Limit) license from the Pakistan Engineering Council, establishing its eligibility to undertake large-scale infrastructure projects. Since inception, HCS has built a strong reputation for timely project execution, cost efficiency, and dependable partnerships with both clients and vendors.


Operations

The Company undertakes diverse infrastructure development works across Pakistan, with an operational focus on highways, bridges, underpasses, flyovers, airports, and other civil engineering projects. Notable projects completed by the Company include the Lahore Ring Road, 2x2.5 MW Hydel Power Project at Chashma, Bahria Grand Hotel, civil works for Benazir Bhutto International Airport, Beijing Underpass in Lahore, Kalma Chowk Underpass and Flyover, Cavalry Ground Underpass, and the Metro Bus projects in Islamabad, Lahore, and Multan. These projects highlight HCS’s ability to execute large and technically demanding assignments, strengthening its position in Pakistan’s construction industry.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership structure remains concentrated, with the two directors, Mr. Shahid Saleem and Mr. M. Shabbir, collectively holding around 52% of HCS. The remaining shares are distributed among the management team, bringing the total number of shareholders to 31. This structure provides employees with an ownership stake, fostering a greater sense of commitment and belonging across the organization.


Stability

The ownership structure has remained stable, with no significant changes in key management personnel since inception. The continued involvement of the directors and management shareholders supports alignment of interests and provides stability to the Company’s overall management and governance.


Business Acumen

HCS benefits from the long-standing association of its shareholders and directors, each bringing extensive knowledge of the construction industry. Mr. Shahid Saleem, its co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, who brings over three decades of experience in Pakistan’s construction sector. Under his leadership, the Company has expanded significantly, delivering landmark projects that have reinforced its position as a trusted and leading infrastructure developer in Pakistan. Their collective experience, supported by an employee-shareholding structure, ensures continuity in leadership, informed decision-making, and a deep understanding of industry dynamics, which underpin the Company’s sustained growth and stability.


Financial Strength

The sponsors of HCS possess adequate financial strength, with their ownership stake concentrated solely in the construction business. This focused exposure reduces the risk of financial diversion and ensures alignment with the Company’s long-term performance. Their support has been evident through personal guarantees in the past, while HCS’s equity participation in Malir Expressway Limited and Shajar Roads Limited reflects the sponsors’ capacity to engage in large-scale infrastructure projects.


Governance
Board Structure

The Company is overseen by a three-member Board of Directors, all of whom hold executive roles. This structure ensures continuity in leadership and alignment with management. However, there remains room for improvement in governance practices, particularly through the potential inclusion of independent directors to strengthen oversight and broaden strategic perspective.


Members’ Profile

The Board comprises qualified professionals with extensive experience in the construction industry. Mr. Saleem Shahid, Chief Executive Officer, brings over three decades of industry expertise. He is supported by Mr. Mohammad Shabir, an actuary by profession responsible for operational oversight, and Mr. Mohsin, a Fellow Chartered Accountant with more than 20 years of experience in financial management. Collectively, the Board’s diverse expertise provides strategic direction and supports the sustainable growth of the Company.


Board Effectiveness

HCS has constituted two Board Committees – the Audit Committee and the Human Resource & Remuneration Committee– to ensure effective oversight of management policies and the Company’s operations. While attendance at Board and Committee meetings has been recorded, the documentation of formal minutes and independent oversight mechanisms present areas for further strengthening.


Financial Transparency

Malik Haroon Shahid Safder & Co., Chartered Accountants, the external auditors of the Company, have issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025. The audit of FY26 is currently in progress.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has an organizational structure with operations segregated into six departments: (i) Engineering, (ii) Information Technology, (iii) Contract Management, (iv) Surveyor, (v) Construction Management, and (vi) Finance. Clear lines of responsibility are defined for each department, ensuring effective functional oversight and accountability.


Management Team

Mr. Shahid Saleem, Chief Executive Officer and one of the founding members of HCS, has over 31 years of diversified experience with leading private sector construction companies and provides strategic leadership to the organization. Supporting him, the senior management team comprises three Project Managers, each with more than 25 years of experience in the construction sector, including over a decade with HCS. They report directly to the CEO and are assisted by a technical team primarily consisting of planning engineers and site in-charges.


Effectiveness

The Company does not have formal management committees in place; however, senior management convenes meetings on a need basis for discussions and decision-making. In addition, management regularly reviews MIS-based reports, which support informed and timely decisions.


MIS

HCS utilizes ERP software, customized for the construction industry by BE-Tech, to manage its operations. The system facilitates monitoring of receivables, payables, general ledger, accounts, and related functions.


Control Environment

The Company has internal control systems and procedures in place to support operational efficiency and reliability of reporting. Oversight is further reinforced by the dual role of employees as shareholders, which enhances accountability and alignment of interests with the Company’s long-term objectives.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's construction sector is exhibiting a gradual recovery, with the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) remaining the major demand driver, followed by private investment. The proposed FY27 PSDP stands at PKR 1,126 billion, marking an increase of approximately 34.5% YoY over the revised FY26 allocation of PKR 837.2 billion. Under the proposed FY27 PSDP, Infrastructure has been allocated PKR 729.9 billion, representing approximately 65% of the total outlay, with Transport & Communication receiving the largest share at PKR 408.9 billion, followed by Water at PKR 140.4 billion and Energy at PKR 135.6 billion. Despite continued constraints on non-PSDP development spending due to tight fiscal policy and IMF commitments, prioritized infrastructure projects continue to offer selective opportunities for construction firms. Construction sector activity remained resilient, recording growth of 5.73% in FY26 compared with overall GDP growth of 3.7%, supported by private-sector activity and government spending, while cement demand, a key indicator of construction activity, rose approximately 10% YoY. Over the medium term, supported by urbanization, population growth, CPEC-related infrastructure development, improving demand for cement and steel, and gradual macroeconomic stabilization, the construction sector is expected to maintain a stable growth trajectory, although its performance will remain dependent on continued public infrastructure investment and easing fiscal and geopolitical pressures.


Relative Position

The Company is one of only ~156 firms (1.6% of over 10,000 registered with PEC) holding the prestigious “CA” category license, enabling participation in large-scale projects. While the sector is generally less formalized, HCS has adopted a corporate structure with employee-shareholders, though the Board remains predominantly sponsor-led. With experienced leadership and technical depth, HCS competes with major players such as FWO, Maaksons Engineering, and Habib Rafiq (Pvt) Limited, maintaining a strong reputation for timely and quality project execution.


Revenues

HCS’s revenue is project-driven, generated through contracts executed independently as well as through joint ventures, primarily in the road and building sectors. The continuity of revenue is closely linked to the availability and execution of infrastructure projects in the Country. As of June 2026, the Company has a portfolio of 8 active projects with a total project cost of approximately PKR 66.3bln. Work completed till June 2026 stands at approximately 24% of total cost, leaving a healthy balance work pipeline to be executed. Major projects include the Development of Mass Transit System in Faisalabad (Orange Line), Infrastructure Development at NSIT Phase-1 (Packages II & III), and the Malir Expressway (EPC Contract). Other notable projects include the Construction of Punjab Local Government Academy at Lahore, Construction of Green Building for EMC, EPD, and Allied New Entities under PGDP, and Traffic Management Solution at Kashmir Chowk, Murree Road, Islamabad. For FY26, the Company recorded contract revenue of approximately PKR 17.6bln. Revenue growth and continuity are influenced by macroeconomic conditions, including inflation and interest rates, which have historically impacted construction activity and project execution. With the recent easing of the policy rate, sector activity is expected to revive, likely translating into increased project mobilization in the coming periods.


Margins

The Company's revenue profile is inherently cyclical, owing to its dependence on large, time-bound contracts. Revenue tends to build during the initial mobilization phase, is recognized as project milestones are achieved, which differ in timing and magnitude across projects, and gains renewed momentum as works approach their final stages. The topline is therefore governed by the timing of fresh awards relative to the completion of existing works. With projects positioned at disparate phases at any given point, margins naturally vary from year to year rather than remaining constant. During FY26, gross margins expanded to 16.1% (FY25: 11.3%), while net profit margins also recovered to 8.0%, compared to 3.9% in FY25.


Sustainability

Besides its core construction business, which benefits from a healthy project pipeline supporting revenue and financial sustainability, HCS holds strategic equity investments in unlisted public companies, providing additional income streams and diversification. The Company has a 7.02% equity stake in Shajar Roads Limited and a 6% stake in Malir Expressway Limited, both held for strategic purposes. These holdings complement the Company’s core operations, enhancing medium-term revenue visibility and supporting financial stability.


Financial Risk
Working capital

HCS manages its working capital primarily through customer receipts, supplemented by a small portion of short-term borrowings, which stood at PKR 151mln as of Jun-26 (Jun-25: PKR 143mln; Jun-24: PKR 133mln). The Company also maintains substantial exposure to non-funded facilities, such as performance guarantees, which are critical for project execution. The net working capital cycle during FY26 reflected the operating model of construction contractors, where timely certification and collection of receivables, together with supplier credit and customer advances, keep the cycle lean and limit reliance on funded debt.


Coverages

During FY26, the Company's free cash flow from operations (FCFO) improved and remained positive, Consequently, coverage indicators strengthened over the period and remained at comfortable levels, supported by the Company's minimal finance cost burden. Internally generated cash flows are adequate to service its funded obligations. This provides the Company with ample cushion to absorb project-related fluctuations in cash flows.


Capitalization

HCS maintains a conservative capital structure with a low reliance on funded debt. As of Jun-26, Total Borrowings stood at PKR 151mln (Jun-25: PKR 146mln), comprising solely short-term running finance, while Shareholders' Equity stood at PKR 7,131mln (Jun-25: PKR 6,379mln). The leverage ratio remained minimal, reflecting the Company's strong equity base. The Company's exposure is predominantly non-funded, driven by bank guarantees issued against its contracting business, and this unfunded exposure remains well supported by the equity base.


 
 

Oct-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
6M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,954 4,042 4,181 4,262
2. Investments 1,026 1,477 1,000 730
3. Related Party Exposure 426 426 192 133
4. Current Assets 5,279 4,564 6,213 5,501
a. Inventories 124 122 494 433
b. Trade Receivables 1,577 825 1,773 1,716
5. Total Assets 10,685 10,509 11,587 10,626
6. Current Liabilities 2,917 3,054 5,049 3,993
a. Trade Payables 1,805 1,576 2,276 1,678
7. Borrowings 151 146 137 231
8. Related Party Exposure 177 473 159 529
9. Non-Current Liabilities 457 457 339 261
10. Net Assets 6,983 6,379 5,902 5,612
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,983 6,379 5,902 5,612
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,908 12,561 17,933 5,562
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,070) (11,143) (15,735) (5,173)
2. Gross Profit 838 1,418 2,198 390
a. Operating Expenses (78) (329) (363) (492)
3. Operating Profit 760 1,089 1,834 (102)
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 342 660 (25) 24
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,102 1,749 1,809 (78)
a. Total Finance Cost (20) (79) (110) (91)
b. Taxation (477) (1,177) (1,485) (317)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 604 493 214 (486)
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 660 (209) 663 (48)
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 641 (292) 554 (135)
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,577) 193 (259) 528
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (936) (99) 295 394
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 877 300 (168) (225)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (2) (3) (4) (4)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (60) 198 123 165
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -5.9% -30.0% 222.4% 0.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 14.2% 11.3% 12.3% 7.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 10.2% 3.9% 1.2% -8.7%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -15.5% -0.1% 2.3% 8.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 18.1% 8.0% 3.7% -9.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 41 47 45 159
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) -11 -9 5 46
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 125.2 67.8 65.6 7.9
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 90.4 -9.6 20.0 -1.1
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.1 -2.1 0.3 -6.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 4.5% 8.8% 4.8% 11.9%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 107.4 47.0 84.3 73.4
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 3.2% 4.6% 5.0% 6.5%

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-26

www.pacra.com