Rating History
Dissemination Date IFS Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Oct-26 AA+ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-25 AA+ (ifs) Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-24 AA+ (ifs) Stable Upgrade -
12-Jul-24 AA (ifs) Positive Maintain -
20-Nov-23 AA (ifs) Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

East West Insurance Company Limited was incorporated as a public listed company (listed on PSX) and became operational in 1983. It operates as a general insurance company with a primary tilt towards the fire & property segment. The Yunus family holds the majority shareholding, with the rest held by the general public. The Board comprises nine members, including four independent directors, and is chaired by Mr. Javed Yunus. Mr. Naved Yunus leads the Company as CEO, supported by Mr. Saad Yunus as Deputy MD and a professional team. Governance and managerial depth remain strong.

Rating Rationale

The IFS rating of East West Insurance Company Limited ('East West' or 'the Company') reflects a stable risk profile supported by the Sponsors, a diversified non-captive underwriting base and strong capital and liquidity. Operating since 1983, the Company has a nationwide presence through regional offices and branches across all provinces, Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. It also has dedicated divisions for corporate, engineering, health and agriculture businesses. The Company underwrites conventional insurance (87% of 6MCY26 GPW) alongside window takaful operations. Fire & property remains the top segment (36%), followed by motor (18%), engineering (18%), miscellaneous (17%) and marine, aviation & transport (12%), indicating a well-spread portfolio. The general insurance sector continues to expand from a low base, with a penetration of 0.2% of GDP. Sector GPW grew 11% to PKR 245bln in CY25 and 13% during 3MCY26, supported by commercial activity, motor and takaful. Profitability remains under pressure. The sector’s combined ratio exceeded 100% in CY25 on elevated takaful claims with limited re-takaful providers, and investment income is expected to stay volatile. Regulatory reforms, including IFRS 17, risk-based capital and higher minimum capital requirements, will raise compliance costs, particularly for smaller players. Against this backdrop, East West has outpaced the sector. GPW grew 45% during 6MCY26 to PKR 7.5bln, building on a 53% increase in CY25 to PKR 12.9bln, with takaful rising faster than conventional business. The Company holds 5.8% of the conventional market and retains a higher share of risk than large-player peers, which has lifted net premium and supported earnings. Underwriting results improved by 64% and stood at PKR 1.0bln in 6MCY26. The combined ratio was 80% (CY25: 84%), well below the sector, on a stable loss ratio and contained expenses. Investment income nearly doubled to PKR 647mln, aided by capital gains. The PKR 13.6bln investment book is deployed largely in government securities and equities, which keeps returns sensitive to market movements. Profit after tax rose markedly to PKR 1.1bln during 6MCY26, translating into a healthy return on equity. Equity reached PKR 7.4bln, and paid-up capital of PKR 3.1bln already exceeds the regulatory minimum requirement. Liquidity remains substantial, and claims management is efficient. A multi-layered treaty program backed by a panel of reinsurers protects against large losses. Management intends to sustain growth by leveraging its specialized divisions, expanding takaful and advancing digitization, while keeping retention and reinsurance protection prudent. Projections indicate continued growth in premiums and profitability in CY26.

Key Rating Drivers

The rating depends on the Company's ability to sustain market share and profitability, and to maintain underwriting discipline as retention rises. Risk-adjusted investment returns must also improve, and capital and liquidity must stay aligned with growth and the evolving risk-based capital regime.

Profile
Legal Structure

East West Insurance Company Limited (“East West” or “the Company”) was incorporated as a public limited company in 1983 and is listed on PSX. The Company’s registered office is in Quetta, while its head office is in Karachi.


Background

Late Mr. Unus Khan, with work experience in the insurance segment across the Middle East, founded East West in 1983. Initially, the Company operated as a general insurer in the conventional business only. Later, East West commenced Window Takaful Operations (WTO) in May 2018 in accordance with the SECP Takaful Rules, 2012. Today, the Company’s operations are carried out through principal offices located in the South, Punjab, and North of the country. The Company’s client base is wholly non-captive, reflecting a diversified customer base sourced independently across its operating segments.


Operations

Currently, the Company is engaged in conventional and takaful general insurance business, supported by a nationwide network of 65 offices comprising 3 principal, 9 regional, 23 agency and 30 branch offices. Its operations span Sindh, Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan. The Company’s business is further supported by dedicated Corporate, Engineering, Health and Agriculture Divisions, alongside its Window Takaful Operations (WTO).


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The shareholding is divided equally among the four sons of Late Mr. Unus Khan. Overall, 69% of the Company’s shareholding is held by the sponsoring family through individuals (42%) and East West Holding Company (27%). The remaining 31% shares are held by various other individuals and institutions.


Stability

The sponsoring family has strengthened its shareholding structure by creating a holding company that consolidates the family’s overall stake in the business. Moreover, the induction of the third generation into the Board and management further fortifies the ownership’s stability.


Business Acumen

The sponsors bring several decades of experience in the insurance sector and have witnessed numerous business cycles over time. The sponsors possess the requisite skills and knowledge to effectively steer the Company.


Financial Strength

The sponsoring family holds an adequate financial footing to support the Company, if need be, going forward. This was evident in the sponsors’ equity injection of PKR 800mln during CY24, while profits have since been capitalized through bonus shares, increasing paid-up capital to PKR 3,096mln as of 6MCY26 (CY25: PKR 2,815mln).


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Company lies with the nine-member Board of Directors (BoD). The BoD comprises four Independent Directors and five Directors representing the sponsoring family. While the BoD maintains a meaningful level of independence, it remains dominated by the sponsoring family. The Board has recently been strengthened by the induction of an Independent Director with over 35 years of experience in insurance and reinsurance.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Javed Yunus is the BoD Chairman and brings over five decades of experience in insurance, marketing and management, with a 40-year association with the group. Mr. Naved Yunus serves as the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) with nearly four decades of work experience. Among the Independent Directors, Mr. Ahsan Alvi has been associated with the insurance segment since 1987, Mr. Shahzad Farooq Lodhi brings nearly four decades of experience in the insurance industry, Mr. Ayaz Hussain Gad has over 35 years of experience in insurance, reinsurance and business development, and Mr. Aman Shah brings experience in corporate governance, business management, real estate and SME development. The Board possesses a diverse set of expertise and skillsets.


Board Effectiveness

The BoD is assisted by committees covering Audit, Ethics, Human Resource & Remuneration, Investment, and Nomination. During CY25, the BoD met four times. Committee meetings are frequently held, and minutes are adequately maintained.


Transparency

External Auditors, M/s Crowe Hussain Chaudhury & Co., Chartered Accountants, issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for CY25. The firm was QCR rated and placed in Category ‘A’ of the SBP’s panel of auditors. Subsequently, the Company appointed M/s BDO Ebrahim & Co., Chartered Accountants, as its external auditors for the period ending CY26, who are also QCR rated and placed in Category ‘A’ of the SBP’s panel of auditors.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company has clear reporting lines ensuring the segregation of duties. The head office oversees three principal offices (South, Punjab and North), which are supported by regional offices and specialized divisions. Each HoD reports to the CEO, who then reports to the BoD. However, the Head of Internal Audit and HR administratively report to the CEO, while functionally reporting to the BoD’s respective committees.


Management Team

Mr. Naved Yunus holds the position of CEO and has been associated with the Company for over four decades. Mr. Pervez Yunus serves as Executive Director – Operations and brings 26 years of insurance experience. Mr. Saad Yunus holds the position of Deputy Managing Director, has been associated with the Company for ten years, and with the insurance industry and an audit firm since 2006. The Company’s management consists of qualified and experienced professionals with a long-standing association with the Company.


Effectiveness

The management is assisted by four committees: Underwriting, Claims Settlement, Reinsurance & Co-Insurance, and Risk Management. These committees meet every quarter to discuss all operational issues of the organization and provide strategic and operational guidance to all the departments. Minutes of these meetings are maintained adequately.


MIS

The updated version of the MIS system was rolled out at the head office, while the complete rollout across branches is expected to be completed soon. The Motor Third Party Liability (MTPL) functionality has also been successfully integrated into the Underwriting module. Furthermore, CDC API integration has been completed in accordance with the guidelines provided by CDC, enabling the system to successfully transmit the required policy data from the Company’s platform to CDC.


Claim Management System

The claim settlement procedure is decentralized at the branch level, with the head office responsible for monitoring. Claim approval authority is retained at the head office level. The head office sets and reviews periodically the limits for settlement by the branches. Claims equal to or higher than that limit are not only circulated to the higher management but are also monitored by the head office.


Investment Management Function

The Investment Committee is constituted at the BoD level. The Company has an established investment department with a structured Investment Policy Statement (IPS) that provides guidelines, such as stop loss limits, and identifies limits for various investment avenues.


Risk Management framework

East West follows adequate risk management procedures and guidelines as defined by the BoD. The Company has developed a standard operating procedures manual incorporating detailed guidelines to be followed before the issuance of a policy.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's general insurance industry recorded Gross Premium Written (GPW) of PKR 245.2bln in CY25 (CY24: PKR 220.0bln), an uptick of 11%, while net premium written improved by 17.5% to PKR 102.2bln. The momentum continued into 6MCY26, with GPW reaching PKR 133.6bln, of which conventional business contributed PKR 108.8bln and takaful PKR 24.7bln. Underwriting performance softened in CY25: conventional underwriting profit declined to PKR 12.1bln (CY24: PKR 13.9bln) on higher claims and acquisition costs, while the takaful segment posted underwriting losses amid a loss ratio of 99.4%, pushing the overall sector combined ratio above 100%. In 6MCY26, net claims stood at 53.2% of net premium revenue (takaful: 79.7%) and the sector reported underwriting income of PKR 10.2bln. Investment income, the sector's key profit stabilizer, grew by 10% to PKR 43.5bln in CY25 and amounted to PKR 18.6bln in 6MCY26, supporting profit after tax of PKR 16.9bln. The ongoing transition to IFRS 17, risk-based capital and the phased increase in minimum paid-up capital to PKR 2.0bln by CY30 is expected to raise compliance costs, particularly for smaller players. Nonetheless, mandatory motor third-party liability, takaful expansion and low penetration (0.2% of GDP) support structural growth, and the sector outlook remains stable.


Relative Position

East West holds a market share of 5.8% as of CY25 (CY24: 5.5%) and is classified among the six large players in the industry in terms of GPW. The Company’s share in industry net premium stood higher at 9.3% (CY24: 6.2%), reflecting its higher retention relative to peers, with a cession level of 38.0% against 62.1% for the large players.


Revenue

The Company generates the majority of GPW from conventional business (87%), while the rest (13%) is generated from takaful business (CY25: 91% and 9%, respectively). During 6MCY26, fire & property stood as the top segment, contributing 35.9% to GPW (CY25: 35.3%), followed by motor (17.8%; CY25: 16.8%), engineering (17.6%; CY25: 26.2%), miscellaneous (17.3%; CY25: 10.3%), and marine, aviation & transport (11.5%; CY25: 11.4%). The Company reported GPW of PKR 7.5bln during 6MCY26, which reflects an uptick of 45% over 6MCY25 (PKR 5.2bln). Takaful contribution reached 81% of its CY25 level within six months, led by the miscellaneous segment. The client base is largely corporate, with the top ten customers contributing around 12% of GPW during 6MCY26. Going forward, GPW is expected to maintain its growth trajectory.


Profitability

During 6MCY26, the Company reported an underwriting profit of PKR 1,008mln (CY25: PKR 1,254mln), already 80% of the CY25 level, with the combined ratio improving to 80.3% (CY25: 84.4%). The improvement was driven by a lower expense ratio of 34.8% (CY25: 38.8%), as management expenses and net commission costs eased to 14.0% and 20.8% of net premium (CY25: 16.5% and 22.4%), while the loss ratio remained stable at 45.5%. Net premium stood at PKR 4,799mln (CY25: PKR 7,649mln), while retention eased to 61.5% (CY25: 69.0%) on higher cessions. The Company reported a net profit of PKR 1,091mln (CY25: PKR 1,471mln), supported by investment income, despite a higher tax charge of 29.1% of profit before tax (CY25: 24.6%). Return on equity (annualized) stood at 31.9% (CY25: 26.6%). Upholding prudent underwriting practices will remain beneficial, going forward.


Investment Performance

As of 6MCY26, the investment book of the Company stood at PKR 13.6bln (CY25: PKR 11.9bln), comprising government securities (40.4%; CY25: 38.1%), equity (39.6%; CY25: 40.1%), savings and term deposits (11.2%; CY25: 14.6%), and cash & bank (7.1%; CY25: 5.3%), while the rest is divided among investment properties and debt instruments. During 6MCY26, the Company reported investment income of PKR 647mln (CY25: PKR 1,016mln), already 64% of the CY25 level, driven by gains on disposal of investments of PKR 297mln (CY25: PKR 182mln) and income from debt securities of PKR 172mln, while the revaluation surplus moderated to PKR 61mln (CY25: PKR 350mln). The investment yield improved to 10.2% (CY25: 9.3%). Investment income covered 64.2% of the underwriting result (CY25: 81.0%), indicating that underwriting remains the primary earnings driver. Given the sizeable equity exposure, prudent investment management would remain important to enhance the bottom line.


Sustainability

The Company’s focus on diversification – engineering, health and agriculture, besides the fire segment – bodes well for its growth, as reflected in the increasing share of motor and miscellaneous segments and the expanding takaful business. The vision is to tap into large projects in the engineering segment, while increasing the Company’s footprint in agriculture and microinsurance. Management projects continued growth in GPW and profitability during CY26.


Financial Risk
Claim Efficiency

As of 6MCY26, claims outstanding days increased to 183 days (CY25: 153 days), as outstanding claims including IBNR rose to PKR 3,383mln (CY25: PKR 3,041mln) in line with the larger business volume, with net claims of PKR 2,332mln already representing 64% of the CY25 level. Premium collection remained efficient, with days premium outstanding declining to 8 days (CY25: 11 days) and receivable days from other insurers at 33 days (CY25: 36 days).


Re-Insurance

The Company’s reinsurance program comprises excess of loss treaties across fire, engineering, marine cargo, motor, miscellaneous accident & bond, and crop & livestock, alongside retakaful treaties for WTO. The panel is led by Saudi Reinsurance Company (A- by S&P) and includes PICC Reinsurance Company Limited (A- by S&P), Africa Specialty Risks, Lloyd’s (AA- by S&P), Hannover Re (A+ by AM Best), Africa Re (A by AM Best), Singapore Reinsurance Corp. Ltd (A by AM Best), Antares Global Management Ltd (A by AM Best), Kuwait Re (A- by AM Best) and MGA Speciality (A- by AM Best). A limited share, between 5% and 7.5% per treaty, is placed with reinsurers rated B+ or B by AM Best. During 6MCY26, reinsurance ceded stood at 35.7% of GPW (CY25: 23.6%), while reinsurance recoveries against outstanding claims of PKR 1,265mln (CY25: PKR 1,506mln) covered 37% of outstanding claims (CY25: 50%).


Cashflows & Coverages

As of 6MCY26, liquid assets (net of borrowings) covered outstanding claims 4.0x (CY25: 3.8x), as liquid assets increased by 14% to PKR 13,407mln (CY25: PKR 11,712mln). Liquid investments stood at 181.6% of equity (CY25: 186.2%), indicating a substantial liquidity cushion.


Capital Adequacy

As of 6MCY26, shareholders’ equity increased by 17% to PKR 7,384mln (CY25: PKR 6,292mln) due to accumulated profits, while paid-up capital rose to PKR 3,096mln (CY25: PKR 2,815mln) through bonus shares. Risky assets declined to 73.2% of equity (CY25: 76.2%), while borrowings remained negligible at PKR 28mln (CY25: PKR 33mln). The paid-up capital is well above SECP’s phased minimum requirement of PKR 1.0bln by end-December 2026, rising to PKR 2.0bln by end-December 2030. The Company meets SECP’s capital adequacy requirement.


 
 

Oct-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
6M
Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
Management Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Investments 13,431 11,747 5,675 3,527
2. Insurance Related Assets 3,103 3,439 3,580 3,428
3. Other Assets 610 754 1,063 836
4. Fixed Assets 333 310 244 213
Total Assets 19,522 17,919 10,562 8,004
1. Underwriting Provisions 3,523 3,943 2,415 1,931
2. Insurance Related Liabilities 4,534 4,391 2,017 1,499
3. Other Liabilities 2,605 2,014 1,316 1,137
4. Borrowings 28 33 41 41
Total Liabilities 12,280 17,760 5,788 4,608
Equity/Fund 7,241 6,158 4,773 3,395
B. INCOME STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
1. Gross Premium Written/Gross Contribution Written 7,493 12,946 8,481 6,740
2. Net Insurance Premium/Net Takaful Contribution 5,122 8,028 4,879 4,137
3. Underwriting Expenses (4,114) (6,773) (4,176) (3,665)
Underwriting Results 1,008 1,254 703 472
4. Investment Income 647 1,016 753 404
5. Other Income / (Expense) (118) (320) (246) (194)
Profit Before Tax 1,538 1,950 1,210 682
6. Taxes (447) (479) (224) (93)
Profit After Tax 1,091 1,471 986 589
PARTICIPANTS' TAKAFUL FUND - PTF
1. Gross Contribution Written 966 1,188 805 600
2. Net Takaful Contribution 192 363 282 132
3. Net Takaful Claims (235) (377) (294) (149)
4. Direct Expenses Including Re-Takaful Rebate Earned 52 35 26 23
Surplus Before Investment & Other Income/(Expense) 9 22 13 6
5. Investment Income 0 0 0 0
6. Other Income/(Expense) 0 0 0 0
Surplus for the Period 9 22 13 6
OPERATOR'S TAKAFUL FUND - OTF
1. Wakala Fee Income 323 378 293 200
2. Management, Commission & Other Acquisition Costs (178) (248) (187) (123)
Underwriting Income/(Loss) 146 130 106 76
3. Investment Income 1 0 0 0
4. Other Income/(Expense) 1 2 2 2
Profit Before tax 148 133 108 78
5. Taxes 0 (38) (31) (22)
Profit After tax 148 95 77 56
C. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Profitability
Loss Ratio - Net Insurance & Takaful Claims / Net Insurance Premium or Takaful Contribution 46% 46% 46% 48%
Combined Ratio (Loss Ratio + Expense Ratio) 80% 84% 86% 89%
2. Investment Performance
Investment Yield 10% 9% 14% 12%
3. Liquidity
(Liquid Assets - Borrowings) / Outstanding Claims Including IBNR 4.0 3.8 3.2 2.4
4. Capital Adequacy
Liquid Investments / Equity (Funds) 182% 186% 117% 101%

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-26

www.pacra.com