Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
09-Oct-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
10-Oct-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
11-Oct-24 BBB A2 Stable Upgrade -
21-Oct-23 BBB- A2 Positive Maintain -
22-Oct-22 BBB- A2 Positive Maintain -
About the Entity

Mumtaz Feeds & Allied Industries (Pvt.) Limited ("Mumtaz Feeds" or "the Company") was incorporated in 2016 and commenced commercial operations the following year. The Company is engaged in the production and sale of broiler and layer feed across a range of formulations, supported by an installed annual production capacity of 144,000 MT (40 MT per hour). Ownership remains concentrated within the sponsoring family, with Mr. Aamir Ali Khan serving as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.

Rating Rationale

The ratings of Mumtaz Feeds & Allied Industries (Pvt.) Limited (“Mumtaz Feeds” or “the Company”) reflect its sustained business profile within Pakistan’s poultry feed segment during FY26, underpinned by an established product portfolio spanning broiler and layer feed formulations, with Broiler Control Finisher remaining the flagship product line. The Company operates an installed annual production capacity of 144,000 MT (40 MT per hour). Mumtaz Feeds benefits from its integration into the broader Mumtaz Group, which maintains an established footprint across the agro-based value chain. Group operations encompass solvent extraction through Mumtaz Agro Industries and broiler farming via Mumtaz Chick and Mumtaz Protein Farms, which operate facilities across Southern Punjab. This operational integration affords meaningful procurement synergies particularly through soybean meal sourced via group entities. Industry dynamics remain supportive on a volumetric level; however, operating margins continue to be constrained by intense competition across a fragmented landscape of integrated players and standalone feed mills. On the raw material front, maize constitutes the principal feed component, whereas reliance on imported soybean meal leaves the sector vulnerable to international price volatility and exchange rate fluctuations. Crucially, the resumption of genetically modified (GM) soybean imports during the period stabilized feed supplies and alleviated prior supply chain bottlenecks.
In FY26, the Company reported revenues of ~PKR 5,487mln, reflecting a YoY decline of ~5.7% (FY25: ~PKR 5,819mln). This contraction was primarily driven by continued reliance on internal group demand, with comparatively less strategic focus placed on expanding external market share. Despite top-line softening, profitability remained resilient: gross margin adjusted slightly to ~3.9% (FY25: ~4.1%), while net margin improved marginally to ~1.8% (FY25: ~1.7%), resulting in net income of ~PKR 101mln (FY25: ~PKR 102mln), remaining broadly consistent year-on-year. The Company actively reduced debt levels and finance costs, further lowering its already conservative leveraging to ~5.8% in FY26 (FY25: ~8.1%), while maintaining comfortable cash flow coverage metrics. Working capital management remained a primary operational pressure point, as the operating cycle stretched due to inventory accumulation (~PKR 2,009mln), which was predominantly funded through supplier credit (~PKR 1,043mln). Governance structure remains family-dominated, with Mr. Aamir Ali Khan serving as Chief Executive Officer of Mumtaz Feeds alongside executive roles across other group entities. The lack of independent board representation highlights room for enhanced corporate governance and board diversity going forward.

Key Rating Drivers

Looking ahead, the ratings remain dependent on the Company’s ability to diversify its revenue base beyond group affiliates, manage working capital cycles efficiently amidst raw material price swings, and sustain its low-leverage financial risk profile to preserve financial flexibility.

Profile
Legal Structure

Mumtaz Feeds & Allied Industries (Pvt.) Limited, referred to as Mumtaz Feeds or the Company, is a private limited company incorporated in Pakistan on March 11, 2016 under the applicable companies law of the jurisdiction. The Company subsequently adopted its present name of Mumtaz Feeds & Allied Industries (Pvt.) Limited. It is headquartered in Multan, Punjab, where its manufacturing and principal business operations are located. The Company functions as a constituent entity of the Mumtaz Group, which maintains presence across the agro based value chain through solvent extraction operations under Mumtaz Agro Industries and commercial broiler farming under Mumtaz Chick and Mumtaz Protein Farms.


Background

The sponsoring group has been associated with the poultry feed business for over fifteen years in varying capacities, including feed trading and the trading of soybean meal, prior to formalising a manufacturing platform. In 2016 the sponsors collaborated to incorporate the Company, and commercial production of poultry feed commenced in 2017. Growth since inception has been organic in nature, funded predominantly through sponsor equity injections and the retention of internally generated profits rather than acquisition led expansion or material recourse to debt capital. Over successive years the Group extended its footprint along the poultry value chain, adding backward integration through solvent extraction and forward integration through commercial poultry farming operations in Southern Punjab, thereby positioning the feed business within a broader integrated structure. Group level diversification initiatives have also been contemplated in the consumer goods segment through a planned soap venture and in the edible oil and ghee segment under a dedicated Group banner.


Operations

The Company manufactures and sells broiler and layer poultry feed in multiple formulations, with a product portfolio comprising sixteen variants spanning starter, grower and finisher categories. Installed annual production capacity stands at 144,000 metric tons, equivalent to 40 metric tons per hour, operated from the Company's facility in Multan, and capacity utilisation was reported at 31% during the year ended 30 June 2026, leaving substantial headroom for volumetric growth without material fresh capital outlay. The Company occupies the feed manufacturing node of the poultry value chain, positioned between grain and oilseed meal suppliers upstream and commercial broiler and layer farms downstream. Procurement centres on maize, wheat, soybean meal and micro ingredients, with soybean meal sourced from an associated concern engaged in solvent extraction, which supports input continuity and cost efficiency. Distribution is concentrated in Southern Punjab and is channelled through a combination of direct institutional supply and dealer based sales, with sales to associated poultry farming concerns representing a significant portion of dispatches. Broiler feed formulations remain the anchor of the portfolio, with the flagship broiler variants in a growth to maturity lifecycle stage within a competitive domestic market. Operations are entirely domestic and revenues are denominated in local currency, with no export exposure reported.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Effective control over strategic direction rests with Mr. Aamir Ali Khan, who holds the single largest stake of 35% and simultaneously serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, making him the ultimate decision maker at the last mile. The remaining shareholding is distributed among Mr. Muhammad Umer with 20%, Mr. Nasir Malik with 17.5%, his brother Mr. Yasir Malik with 17.5%, and Dr. Muhammad Aslam with 10%. Ultimate beneficial ownership therefore vests directly with the five sponsoring individuals, and the Company is held within the wider Mumtaz Group structure through common sponsor ownership rather than through a formal holding company.


Stability

Ownership has remained stable within the same group of five sponsors since incorporation in 2016, reflecting continuity of sponsor commitment through the volatile feed price environment of recent years. Two of the shareholders are related as brothers, which reinforces the family and closely held character of the structure. Sponsor commitment is evidenced by the retention of earnings within the business and by the funding of working capital requirements largely from internal cash generation rather than external borrowing.


Business Acumen

The sponsors collectively carry over a decade and a half of exposure to the poultry and poultry feed industry, and Mr. Aamir Ali Khan has been engaged in the sale of poultry feed and the trading of soybean meal for more than two decades. This tenure spans multiple feed price and poultry demand cycles, including the period of acute soybean meal supply disruption and the subsequent normalisation, and the sponsors have demonstrated an ability to preserve profitability through the recent phase of price deflation and volumetric pressure. The sponsors' other ventures within the Mumtaz Group, covering solvent extraction and commercial broiler farming, operate in adjacent segments of the same value chain, which deepens their understanding of demand formation, formulation economics and procurement timing.


Financial Strength

Sponsor financial strength is derived from vested interests across the poultry value chain, encompassing solvent extraction and poultry farming operations held under common ownership, which provide alternative sources of liquidity and operational support to the Company. Within the Company itself, the equity base stood at PKR 1,712mln at 30 June 2026 against PKR 1,611mln at 30 June 2025, built entirely through paid up capital and accumulated retained profits, and total borrowings of only PKR 50mln at 30 June 2026 indicate that the balance sheet has been financed principally by sponsor equity and retained earnings. Related party exposure moved to a net asset position of PKR 26mln at 30 June 2026 from a net liability position of PKR 55mln at 30 June 2025, indicating that the Company was not dependent on related party funding during the year. The demonstrated willingness of the sponsors to allow profits to be retained rather than distributed provides a measure of implicit financial support to the credit profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors comprises three members, consisting of one Executive Director and two Non Executive Directors, with no independent representation on the Board. Two Board subcommittees have been constituted, namely the Audit and Risk Management Committee and the Procurement and Development Committee, which address financial oversight and input sourcing respectively.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Aamir Ali Khan serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and brings more than two decades of experience in the sale of poultry feed and the trading of soybean meal, giving the Board direct commercial and procurement expertise in the Company's core activity. Dr. Muhammad Aslam, who holds a 10% shareholding and serves as General Manager Production, carries nineteen years of industry experience of which nine years have been with the Group, and holds a postgraduate qualification in animal nutrition, contributing technical formulation and production expertise at the Board level. The remaining Board representation is drawn from the sponsoring shareholder group, whose members carry over a decade of poultry industry exposure. The Board therefore combines commercial, procurement and technical production competencies, although financial, legal and independent non executive skill sets are not separately represented, and directors are drawn from the sponsor pool with tenures extending from incorporation.


Board Effectiveness

The Board has established a working oversight structure through its two subcommittees, with the Audit and Risk Management Committee serving as the primary channel for review of financial reporting and risk matters, including the material volume of transactions conducted with associated concerns that arise from both the sale of feed to Group poultry farms and the procurement of soybean meal from the Group solvent extraction operation. The positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are held by the same individual, which is not consistent with established corporate governance best practices.


Financial Transparency

The external audit is undertaken by Waqas & Co. Chartered Accountants. The firm holds a satisfactory Quality Control Review rating; however, it is not included on the State Bank of Pakistan’s panel of auditors. The auditors issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates a flat organisational structure built around seven functional departments, namely Production, Marketing, Procurement, Head Office, Audit and Tax, Accounts and Imports. All departmental heads report directly to the Chief Executive Officer, who consequently sits at the apex of every reporting line. The decision making model is therefore centralised, with strategic, pricing, procurement and capital allocation authority concentrated at the Chief Executive Officer level and departmental heads exercising delegated authority within operational limits. The internal audit function reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer, which places assurance within the same reporting line as the functions it reviews. The flat span of control supports rapid decision making in a business where procurement and pricing decisions must respond quickly to commodity price movements, but it increases dependence on a single individual for coordination across functions.


Management Team

Mr. Aamir Ali Khan, Chief Executive Officer, has more than twenty years of experience in poultry feed sales and soybean meal trading and has led the Company since incorporation. Dr. Muhammad Aslam, General Manager Production, holds a Master of Science with Honours in animal nutrition and brings over a decade of experience in poultry feed manufacturing and formulation, with nineteen years of total industry experience including nine years within the Group. Mr. Bilal serves as Chief Financial Officer with eight years of professional experience and holds responsibility for financial reporting, working capital management and compliance. The senior team has remained materially unchanged across the last three years, indicating low executive turnover and continuity of institutional knowledge.


Effectiveness

Management has demonstrated strong execution by maintaining profitability in a contracting market, turning around cash flows to positive inflows, and significantly reducing financing costs. Operational discipline is evident in strict credit controls, strategic raw material stocking, and rigorous adherence to food quality standards, ensuring consistent, competitively priced formulations.


MIS

The Company operates an internally developed software platform comprising three modules covering Financial Accounting, Sale and Purchase, and Software Security, designed specifically to meet the Company's accounting and inventory management requirements.


Control Environment

Management maintains a structured control environment anchored by Board-level oversight through the Audit and Risk Management Committee and the Procurement and Development Committee, alongside production-stage quality controls and strict regulatory compliance. Operationally, the framework is supported by system segregation in sales, purchasing, and software security, as well as an internal audit function reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer. However, full reporting independence to the Audit Committee would further strengthen the framework.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s poultry sector is a vital, fast growing agricultural pillar contributing over PKR 923bln to the economy and employing 1.5 million people, though its lack of export outlets leaves domestic pricing fully exposed to local supply imbalances. Structurally fragmented with around 300 commercial feed mills operating below capacity, the industry centers on feed manufacturing, which accounts for 65% to 70% of production costs, and is projected to expand at a 7.9% CAGR through 2032. Operations face high cyclicality and supplier power driven by intensive dependence on domestic maize, nearly 65% consumed by poultry feed, and imported soybean meal, exposing players to international commodity prices and currency fluctuations. Customer power is moderate, but credit risk remains high due to short 35 to 42 day production cycles and geographic concentration in Punjab. Furthermore, the sector navigates significant vulnerabilities, including regulatory and import policy discontinuities, high working capital intensity, counterparty risks from thinly capitalized farms, and disease outbreak threats, while technological and formulation shifts increasingly focus on operational efficiency and import substitution.


Relative Position

Operating at a 31% capacity utilisation rate for the year ended 30 June 2026, the company experienced a 5.7% sales contraction to PKR 5,487mln, diverging from the broader industry growth trajectory while successfully stabilising its topline compared to previous sharp declines. Competitive differentiation relies heavily on group integration, which secures soybean meal from an associated extraction plant and guarantees volume continuity through captive offtake channels with group poultry farms, alongside favorable logistics in the Southern Punjab poultry belt and sponsor-led procurement expertise.


Revenues

Revenue for the year ended 30 June 2026 stood at PKR 5,487mln, down 5.7% from PKR 5,819mln in the previous year, following the sharper 48.5% decline recorded in FY2025. The Company continues to derive the bulk of its revenue from broiler feed formulations, with the flagship variant contributing nearly half of turnover. Customer concentration remains notable, as approximately half of sales are generated from associated Group entities, namely Mumtaz Chicks and Mumtaz Proteins. Geographically, the revenue base remains entirely domestic, with sales predominantly concentrated in Southern Punjab.


Margins

Operating efficiency remains tightly bound to raw material dynamics, with cost of goods sold absorbing 96.1% of revenue at PKR 5,271mln for the year ended 30 June 2026, which yielded a slightly compressed gross margin of 3.9% compared to 4.1% previously. Key inputs such as maize, wheat, and soybean meal, sourced largely via an associated Group extraction plant, generate concentrated supplier reliance alongside indirect exposure to import driven price volatility. Despite overhead absorption being constrained by a 31% capacity utilisation rate, operating expenses remained minimal at just 1.1% of revenue, underscoring a heavily variable cost structure that successfully preserved profitability across consecutive years of topline contraction. The operating margin settled at 2.8%, whereas the net margin edged upward to 1.8% from 1.7%, propelled by reductions in financing expenses and lower tax burdens.


Sustainability

Strategic direction centers on defending market presence through competitive pricing and consistent quality, supported by a demonstrated topline stabilization and disciplined cost control. Long term viability is underpinned by a projected industry growth rate of 7.9%, substantial unutilized capacity that permits volumetric expansion without heavy capital expenditure, and operational integration within the Mumtaz Group. However, key constraints include a thin gross margin that offers limited buffer against input shocks, heavy reliance on associated concerns for dispatches, and a subscale cost position. Furthermore, the business must navigate external vulnerabilities such as regulatory shifts in grain and feed policies, climate risks affecting domestic agriculture, and compliance with local food safety frameworks, while broader group diversification outside the company balance sheet promises potential operational synergies over time.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The working capital cycle lengthened for the year ended 30 June 2026 as the net cycle stretched to 76 average days from 67 average days for the year ended 30 June 2025, driven entirely by a deliberate accumulation of inventory that pushed average days to 118 and now accounts for the majority of total assets. Receivables management remains exceptionally strong with a collection period of around eight days for the year ended 30 June 2026, reflecting stringent credit controls and captive dispatches to associated entities. This inventory build was substantially financed on the funding side through an extension of supplier credit, allowing the company to avoid heavy reliance on short term bank borrowings.


Coverages

Coverage indicators strengthened materially for the year ended 30 June 2026, driven by restored operational cash generation and a sharp reduction in the cost of debt. Net cash provided by operating activities rebounded to PKR 166mln from an outflow of PKR 64mln in the preceding year, while free cash flow comfortably covered financial commitments 5.5 times. This performance was supported by a drop in financing expenses resulting from lower average borrowings and a significantly reduced average borrowing rate in line with domestic benchmark trends, pushing EBITDA coverage of finance cost to 55.6 times for the year ended 30 June 2026. Furthermore, minimal maintenance capital expenditure preserved cash flow quality, and interest obligations were met without accrual buildup, though cash continuity remains tied to a single business line and the liquidity of associated group counterparties.


Capitalization

The capital structure remains conservatively positioned and improved further over the review period, with total borrowings declining to PKR 50mln at 30 June 2026 from PKR 87mln at 30 June 2025, while shareholders equity strengthened to PKR 1,712mln from PKR 1,611mln through the retention of net income of PKR 101mln. Leverage, measured as total borrowings against the sum of total borrowings and equity, accordingly eased to 5.8% at 30 June 2026 from 8.1% at 30 June 2025, a level that stands far below the sector norm, which places the company among the least leveraged participants in its segment. Financial policy remains aligned with management’s strategic objective of maintaining a low debt profile, with working capital primarily funded through internally generated cash flows and supplier credit rather than bank financing. The Company has consistently adhered to this approach across the cycle, with leverage remaining low and declining further in the latest period despite a substantial build-up in inventory, supporting continued financial flexibility.


 
 

Oct-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Jun-26
12M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 425 465 421
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 2,456 1,679 2,105
a. Inventories 2,009 1,402 1,508
b. Trade Receivables 127 112 212
5. Total Assets 2,881 2,144 2,526
6. Current Liabilities 1,088 390 962
a. Trade Payables 1,043 300 781
7. Borrowings 50 87 0
8. Related Party Exposure (26) 55 55
9. Non-Current Liabilities 58 2 2
10. Net Assets 1,712 1,611 1,509
11. Shareholders' Equity 1,712 1,611 1,509
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,487 5,819 11,309
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,271) (5,581) (10,746)
2. Gross Profit 216 238 563
a. Operating Expenses (62) (65) (74)
3. Operating Profit 154 173 489
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (9) (11) 0
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 144 162 489
a. Total Finance Cost (8) (22) (41)
b. Taxation (34) (38) (166)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 101 102 282
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 215 49 474
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 207 26 433
c. Changes in Working Capital (41) (90) (224)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 166 (64) 209
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (13) (97) (76)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (38) 73 (155)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 116 (88) (21)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -5.7% -48.5% 36.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 3.9% 4.1% 5.0%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.8% 1.7% 2.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 3.2% -0.7% 2.2%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 6.1% 6.5% 20.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 121 101 54
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 76 67 30
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.3 4.3 2.2
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 55.6 11.0 13.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 5.5 2.3 11.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.5 3.2 0.1
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 5.8% 8.1% 3.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 3.7% 23.4% 13.7%

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

Oct-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-26

www.pacra.com