Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
17-Jun-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
17-Jun-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
26-Jun-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
26-Jun-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
30-Jun-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Kohat Textile Mills ("Kohat Textile" or "the Company") was incorporated in 1966 under the repealed Companies Ordinance,1984 and became commercially operational in 1967. As at end of 9MFY26, Kohat Textile's (~73.17%) ownership vests with Saif Group through Saif Holdings, followed by the general public (~15.24%), the financial institutions (~9.83%), and others (~1.76%). The Company's Board is chaired by Mr. Javed Saifullah Khan, while Mr. Assad Saifullah Khan heads the Company as the CEO.

Rating Rationale

Kohat Textile Mills Limited ("Kohat Textile" or "the Company") is a listed spinning concern and the first textile venture of the Saif Group ("the Group"), a diversified conglomerate with investments spanning energy, textiles, healthcare, technology, and real estate. Kohat Textile manufactures specialized yarn comprising polyester, viscose, acrylic, and blended varieties. The ratings draw strength from the Company's established operating track record, strategic importance within the Group's textile platform, and demonstrated ability to navigate varying industry cycles. During FY26, the Company completed a Balancing, Modernization and Replacement (BMR) initiative involving the installation of imported machinery and replacement of selected legacy equipment, increasing installed spindle capacity from ~44,508 to ~46,908 spindles. The upgraded capacity became operational during the year and is expected to support operating efficiency and production flexibility over time. The Company remains predominantly focused on the domestic market. During 9MFY26, sales increased to PKR ~6.3bln (9MFY25: PKR ~6.1bln), supported by stable demand and relatively improved yarn realizations. Profitability indicators exhibited further strengthening, with gross margin improving to ~16.1% (9MFY25: ~14.3%), while net margin increased to ~4.1% (9MFY25: ~3.8%). Margin improvement was supported by operational efficiencies, lower finance costs, and a continued focus on specialized yarn categories with relatively better value addition. The Company's energy profile has strengthened during FY25 through continued investment in renewable energy infrastructure. Solar capacity has expanded to approximately ~5.1MW against an average operating requirement of ~4.5–4.6MW. The resulting energy mix, comprising solar generation, grid electricity, and limited natural gas based backup generation, has reduced exposure to energy cost volatility and enhanced operating resilience within a sector where energy remains a key cost component. The financial risk profile remains adequate. As of Mar-26, the Company's equity base strengthened to PKR ~4.8bln (Jun-25: PKR ~4.6bln), supported by internal capital generation. Total borrowings stood at PKR ~3.7bln, translating into leverage of ~43.5%, broadly aligned with the Company's operating requirements. Coverage metrics improved, with EBITDA-to-finance cost increasing to ~2.8x (9MFY25: ~2.3x), benefiting from stronger earnings generation and a decline in the average borrowing rate to ~12.0% (Jun-24: ~20.4%). Liquidity remains manageable, although working capital intensity continues to be inherent to the spinning business model. The ratings also incorporate the Company's association with the Saif Group and the increasing coordination across the Group's textile operations, which provides support through shared oversight, technical expertise, and strategic alignment.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings remain dependent upon the Company's ability to sustain profitability, preserve coverage indicators, and maintain leverage at levels commensurate with the current rating category. Sustained improvement in operating performance, continued strengthening of cash flow generation, and prudent management of working capital requirements will remain important rating considerations. Conversely, material deterioration in margins, weakening of coverage metrics, or a significant increase in leverage beyond projected levels may exert pressure on the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

Kohat Textile Mills Limited is a public limited company incorporated in Pakistan in 1967, with its shares listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange. The company commenced operations in the first quarter of 1970, and its early success served as a catalyst for the growth and diversification of the Saif Group in the years that followed.


Background

Kohat Textile Mills Limited was founded in 1967 by the late Begum Kulsum Saifullah Khan, a distinguished figure known for her contributions to the corporate, social, and political spheres. With her strategic vision and entrepreneurial insight, she laid the foundation for what later evolved into the renowned Saif Group. Serving as Chairperson of the Saif Group of Companies from 1964 to 1990, she guided its growth into one of the leading business conglomerates with diversified interests in textiles, power generation, healthcare, real estate, oil and gas exploration, and software development.


Operations

The Company operates a single spinning facility with an installed capacity of ~46,908 spindles following the completion of a Balancing, Modernization and Replacement (BMR) initiative during FY26. Kohat Textile manufactures specialized yarn comprising polyester, viscose, acrylic, and blended varieties. The Company has also strengthened its energy profile through continued investment in renewable energy infrastructure. Following the commissioning of an additional 3MW solar project during FY25, total solar generation capacity increased to approximately ~5.1MW, exceeding average operating power requirements. The current energy mix comprises solar generation, grid electricity (PESCO), and limited natural gas based backup generation, reducing exposure to energy cost volatility and supporting operational continuity.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

As at end of 9MFY26, Kohat Textile's (~73.17%) ownership vests with Saif Group through Saif Holdings, followed by the general public (~15.24%), the financial institutions (~9.83%), and others (~1.76%).


Stability

Kohat Textile Mills Limited is a venture of the Saif Group, and the financial backing and business acumen of the sponser provides strength to the businesss. Majority of the ownership vestes with the Saif Group through the holding company (Saif Holdings). The group (Saif Group) has a defined structure in place that ensures stability of the Company.


Business Acumen

Saif Group is one of the oldest medium-sized business conglomerates in Pakistan with considerable interests in textiles. The sponsors have a presence of  decades in the local Spinning industry, eventually developing expertise. However, the Group’s growth in the textile sector was limited, but it has sustained through the volatility of the textile industry. The group has other texile venuters as well such as Saif Textile Mills which is uniquely positioned towards various segments of the market offering a diverse product line to fulfill demands of customers worldwide for multiple end-uses including Denim, Apparel, Shirting, Home Textile and Technical Fabrics. Another venture, Mediterranean Textile which is engaged in the manufacture of and sale of high quality yarn which is synthesized using Egyptian longstaple cottons while being engaged in the manufacture of and sale of high quality yarn which is synthesized using Egyptian longstaple cottons.


Financial Strength

Saif Group holds an interest in oil and gas exploration, power generation, textiles manufacturing, real estate development, and health care services, through 7 subsidiaries and 4 associated companies across different sectors. Saif Group holds stable nancial muscle, and the Sponsors are willing to support the Company, if needed.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board comprises eight members with a major concentration of Saif family members. The Board consists of four non-executive directors, one executive director, one female and two independent directors.


Members’ Profile

The Board is chaired by Javed Saifullah Khan. He has been serving as the Chairman of the Group (Saif Group) for over three decades and is also the Chairman of the Board aand non-executive director for Kohat Textile Mills Limited, Saif Power Limited(SPL), Saif Textile Mills Limited, and Saif Energy Limited. He is credited with launching Mobilink(Jazz) and establishing Mediterranean Textile Company. His experience spans over various industries such as telecom, power generation, health care and textile. He has an MBA from University of Pittsburgh  and BA in Economis from Carnegie Mellon University. Anwar Saifullah Khan is the Co-Chairman of Saif Group annd the Chairman for Saif Energy Ltd.  He holds an MA in Political Science from the University of Peshawar, an MA in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Christ Church, the University of Oxford and a master’s in Public Administration from the University of Southern California, USA. Mr. Anwar joined Civil Service of Pakistan in 1970 and was the Deputy Commisioner of Koht and Mardan districts. Ms. Hoor Yousafzai serves as the Director on the Board. She serves as the CEO of Saif Holdings, which is the holding company of Kohat Textile Mills Limited. She also serves as the Chairperson of the Board for Saif  Power Ltd and Saif Healthcare Ltd. Barrister Assad Saifullah Khan is the CEO and director on the Board.


Board Effectiveness

The evaluation of Board’s role of oversight and its effectiveness is continual process, which is appraised by the Board itself. The board has adopted a highly structured process to evaluate its own performance, as well as individual performances of every member. Comprehensive questionnaires are developed in the conformity with Code of Corporate Governance and International best Practices.The Company has two committees in place; Audit Committee, and HR & Remuneration Committee.


Financial Transparency

The Company's external auditors, M/s Shinewing Hameed Chaudhri & Co Chartered accountants have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the Company for FY25.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company is managed through Operations, Sales, After Sales, Production, Production Planning and Control, Supply Chain, Commercial and Planning, Engineering and Projects, Accounts, Finance, Information Technology, and HR & Administration. These departments report to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who subsequently reports to the Board of Directors (BoD).


Management Team

The CEO of the Company, Barrister Asad Saifullah Khan graduated from Unieristy of Pennsylvania in 2004 and  Common Professional Examination/ Graduate Diploma in Law from the College of Law in 2005, and certification in the Bar Vocational Course from the Inns of Court School of Law (ICSL) in 2007.  Mr. Asad brings considerable experience gained from working in Pakistan and in the UK. He is accompnied with a seasoned team of professionals. Mr. Abid Hussain serves as the CFO of the Company, leveraging over 39 years of experience in finance. He previously managed the financial and operational affairs of Mediterranean Textile Company in Alexandria, Egypt. Mr. Umar Shehzad is the Company Secretary and holds an LLB and a Master’s degree from the University of the Punjab and is a Certified Director from the Pakistan Institute of Corporate Governance (PICG). With over 28 years of professional experience in national and multinational organizations, he has extensive expertise in Accounting, Financial Controls, Investment Management, Corporate Compliance, and Legal Affairs.


Effectiveness

All deliberations are held at meetings conducted by department heads as required. Though no formal meeting schedule exists at Kohat Textile, daily and weekly meetings are held to manage affairs. The daily and weekly reports are generated for top management with a main focus on production and liquidity position, whereas P&L is discussed on a need basis in the meetings.


MIS

Kohat Textile has in place a Microsoft Dynamics-based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system that provides comprehensive MIS reporting.


Control Environment

The Company maintains an in-house internal audit function, which enhances risk management, control, and governance processes. Additionally, the Company's plant is connected to the head ofce through VPN, thereby reporting on a real-time basis.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan’s textile exports improved during FY25, supported by gradual normalization in global demand and easing domestic financial conditions. Sector exports increased to USD ~17.3bln in FY25 (FY24: USD 16.7bln), reflecting a recovery led primarily by value-added segments, including garments and home textiles, while the spinning segment continued to operate under a highly competitive and margin-sensitive environment. Despite the improvement in export volumes, the operating landscape remained structurally constrained by elevated energy tariffs and the full-year impact of the Normal Tax Regime (NTR), which has materially altered post-tax profitability for export-oriented units. The imposition of corporate income tax and super tax under NTR has continued to compress net margins, particularly for low- to mid-tier spinning entities with limited pricing power and scale efficiencies. However, the progressive decline in policy rates during FY25 provided partial relief to financing costs, improving cash-flow dynamics and offering some cushion to debt-servicing metrics across the sector. In parallel, energy efficiency initiatives, particularly solarization, have emerged as a key structural differentiator, enabling relatively stronger cost positioning and margin resilience for companies with early investments in renewable energy. At the global level, evolving trade policies, shifting tariff regimes, and ongoing realignment of supply chains are expected to reshape competitive dynamics within major textile markets, particularly Europe and North America. These developments introduce both risks and selective opportunities for Pakistani exporters. While heightened competition and regulatory compliance requirements may intensify pressure on conventional suppliers, efficient spinning units aligned with quality, traceability, and sustainability standards stand to benefit from supply-chain diversification and buyer risk rebalancing. Overall, industry conditions during FY25 reflected a gradual shift toward stabilization, with future performance increasingly dependent on product mix optimization, export orientation, energy efficiency, regulatory adaptability, and financial discipline.



Relative Position

Kohat Textile maintains an established presence within Pakistan's spinning sector, supported by its longstanding operating history and affiliation with the Saif Group. Following the recent BMR initiative, the Company's installed capacity increased to ~46,908 spindles, further strengthening its operating profile. The Company operates in the specialized yarn segment, catering to diverse customer requirements across polyester, viscose, acrylic, and blended yarn categories. While the industry comprises participants of varying scale and business models, Kohat Textile continues to maintain a stable market presence through its focused product offering, operational experience, and emphasis on efficiency enhancements. The Company's ongoing investments in modernization and renewable energy infrastructure are expected to support its competitive positioning over the medium term.


Revenues

The Company maintains a diversified product offering within a single reportable segment comprising cotton yarn, synthetic yarn, cotton blends, and man-made fiber products. Yarn sales continue to dominate the revenue mix, contributing approximately ~97% of total revenue. During 9MFY26, revenue increased by ~3.3% to ~PKR 6,313mln (9MFY25: ~PKR 6,109mln), supported by stable demand and relatively improved yarn realizations. Despite ongoing challenges within the spinning sector, including competitive pricing dynamics and fluctuating raw material costs, the Company has maintained a stable topline trajectory. Own manufactured products continue to constitute the overwhelming majority of sales, while trading activities remain immaterial. Management has also indicated an increasing focus on higher value-added specialized yarn categories, including mélange and surgical yarn, to support profitability and product differentiation.


Margins

Profitability indicators exhibited further improvement during 9MFY26. Gross margin increased to ~16.1% (9MFY25: ~14.3%), while operating margin improved to ~11.7% (9MFY25: ~10.6%). Net margin strengthened to ~4.1% compared to ~3.8% during the corresponding period last year. Margin expansion was supported by improved operating efficiencies, better product mix optimization, lower borrowing costs, and continued benefits from energy cost rationalization initiatives. Finance costs declined in relative terms due to the lower interest rate environment, while enhanced solar utilization contributed to greater cost predictability. Consequently, net profitability increased to ~PKR 258mln during 9MFY26 (9MFY25: ~PKR 230mln).


Sustainability

The Company's sustainability profile is supported by ongoing efforts to improve operational efficiency, optimize energy consumption, and enhance product competitiveness. During FY25, Kohat Textile commissioned an additional 3MW solar project, increasing total solar capacity to approximately ~5.1MW and materially reducing dependence on external energy sources. Furthermore, the recently completed BMR initiative increased installed spindle capacity to ~46,908 spindles and introduced modern imported machinery aimed at improving productivity, reducing wastage, and enhancing operational flexibility. Management also continues to pursue a gradual shift toward higher value-added yarn segments, which may support earnings resilience amid the cyclical nature of the spinning industry.


Financial Risk
Working capital

Net Working Capital (Average Days) increased to ~137 days during 9MFY26 (9MFY25: ~111 days), reflecting a comparatively longer operating cycle. The increase was primarily driven by higher trade receivables and inventory levels associated with business expansion and sales growth. Inventory days increased to ~67 days (9MFY25: ~59 days), while receivable days rose to ~100 days (9MFY25: ~72 days). Despite the elongated working capital cycle, liquidity indicators remained adequate, with the current ratio improving to ~4.6x (9MFY25: ~2.9x).


Coverages

Coverage indicators continued to improve during 9MFY26, supported by stronger earnings generation and lower financing costs. EBITDA coverage improved to ~2.8x (9MFY25: ~2.3x), while FCFO coverage remained adequate at ~1.4x (9MFY25: ~1.4x). FCFO increased to ~PKR 787mln (9MFY25: ~724mln), reflecting improved operating cash flow generation. The reduction in the entity's average borrowing cost, coupled with stronger profitability, has enhanced debt servicing capacity and provided cushion against earnings volatility.


Capitalization

The Company maintained a stable capitalization profile during the review period. Leverage stood at ~43.5% as of Mar-26 (9MFY25: ~41.7%), reflecting a moderate increase in borrowings primarily to support working capital requirements and ongoing capital expenditure initiatives. Total borrowings increased to ~PKR 3,723mln (9MFY25: ~2,950mln), while shareholders' equity strengthened to ~PKR 4,844mln (9MFY25: ~4,119mln), supported by profit retention and internal capital generation. Despite higher borrowings, the strengthened equity base has helped maintain capitalization metrics within an acceptable range for the assigned rating level.


 
 

Jun-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 6,366 6,252 5,006 5,068
2. Investments 10 9 5 5
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 3,765 3,841 3,305 2,726
a. Inventories 1,412 1,570 1,361 1,234
b. Trade Receivables 2,105 2,037 1,761 1,398
5. Total Assets 10,140 10,103 8,315 7,799
6. Current Liabilities 811 1,009 1,178 793
a. Trade Payables 356 460 677 472
7. Borrowings 3,723 3,808 2,702 2,794
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 60
9. Non-Current Liabilities 763 678 524 503
10. Net Assets 4,844 4,607 3,910 3,649
11. Shareholders' Equity 4,844 4,607 3,910 3,709
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 6,313 8,253 7,964 5,952
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,299) (7,050) (6,745) (5,105)
2. Gross Profit 1,014 1,204 1,220 847
a. Operating Expenses (277) (298) (283) (239)
3. Operating Profit 737 905 936 608
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 9 22 (12) 2
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 746 927 924 610
a. Total Finance Cost (335) (451) (600) (470)
b. Taxation (153) (187) (110) (55)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 258 289 214 85
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 787 964 965 671
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 787 964 965 282
c. Changes in Working Capital (96) (638) (182) (558)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 691 326 783 (276)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (246) (897) (85) (225)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (439) 572 (702) 511
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 6 0 (5) 10
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 2.0% 3.6% 33.8% 20.7%
b. Gross Profit Margin 16.1% 14.6% 15.3% 14.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.1% 3.5% 2.7% 1.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 10.9% 3.9% 9.8% 1.9%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 7.3% 6.8% 5.6% 2.3%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 154 149 132 149
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 137 124 106 110
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.6 3.8 2.8 3.4
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.8 2.5 1.8 1.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 2.3 2.3 2.0 4.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 43.5% 45.3% 40.9% 43.5%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 75.2 63.8 81.7 106.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 12.0% 13.8% 20.4% 16.5%

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-26

www.pacra.com