Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Jun-26 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Jun-25 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
14-Jun-24 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Jun-23 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
24-Jun-22 BBB A2 Positive Maintain -
About the Entity

E-Vision Manufacturing Limited is a public; unlisted entity incorporated in 2013. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing and regeneration of polyester staple fiber with a gross production capacity of 60 tons per day. The Company’s shareholding is structured through Marylebone Management Limited (MML), an offshore investment company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. MML is wholly owned by IDL Investments, which holds a 59.62% stake in E-Vision. The remaining 40.38% stake is held by Mr. Abdul Ghaffar, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. IDL Investments itself is wholly owned by Mr. Kashif Naseem Afzal.

Rating Rationale

The ratings reflect E-Vision Manufacturing Limited's ("the Company" or "E-Vision") adequate business profile and its established position in the recycled polyester staple fiber (r-PSF) industry. The Company has carved a meaningful niche in the textile sector by producing various grades of white, black, and green r-PSF, as well as polyester chips, sourced from post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. The global market is undergoing a gradual shift from virgin to recycled polyester, driven by environmental advocacy from regulatory bodies worldwide. r-PSF offers tangible advantages over its virgin counterpart, including lower energy consumption during manufacturing, reduced dependence on natural resources, and a more competitive cost structure. The domestic textile sector experienced a structural shift in CY25, as a significant shortfall in cotton production compelled spinners to increase their use of man-made fibers (MMF) to sustain output levels. This substitution effect drove an 8.3% volumetric increase in PSF demand, with total supply reaching 657,075 tons per annum, up from 606,615 tons in CY24. Demand was met through a combination of domestic production and a sharp rise in imports. The sustained influx of competitively priced imports remains a key credit concern. Import volumes surged approximately 23.5% year-on-year in CY25 to 325,430 tons, capturing nearly 50% of the market. This persistent trend has structurally weakened the pricing power of domestic producers and contributed to suboptimal capacity utilization across the local industry. Against this backdrop, E-Vision recorded revenue of approximately PKR 1,117 million in CY25, a decline of around 22% from PKR 1,438 million in CY24, primarily due to lower sales volumes and sustained pricing pressure. To address this challenge, the Company undertook a sizeable capital expenditure to modify and upgrade its production plant, enhancing its ability to manufacture higher-quality r-PSF. This investment is expected to improve price realization and sales volumes in the domestic market and support an expansion of its export footprint in the Asia-Pacific region. Additionally, this investment is anticipated to rationalize the raw material mix, reduce input costs, and ultimately improve operating margins. The financial risk profile has faced some dilution, characterized by modest coverage ratios, constrained cash flows, and a stretched working capital cycle. The capital structure remains leveraged, with borrowings predominantly comprising short-term loans used for working capital management.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings hinge on sustainable revenue growth and margin improvement. Moreover, it is essential to maintain a robust capital structure consistent with the financial projections. Looking ahead, improvements to the Company's governance framework, control environment, and external audit function by engaging auditors that are included in SBP’s panel of auditors would be viewed positively.

Profile
Legal Structure

E-Vision Manufacturing Limited (E-Vision or “The Company”) is an unlisted, public limited concern incorporated in 2013.


Background

E-Vision was incorporated in March 2013, as a private limited company and subsequently converted to public status in September 2015.


Operations

The Company is involved in the manufacturing and recycling of polyester staple fiber (PSF) using the waste of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles or other waste material. E-Vision's r-PSF is mainly used in the manufacturing of yarn for woven & knitted fabric for the home textile & other garments industry. The Company’s production facility is located in Sundar Industrial Estate, Lahore, and consists of two units: a washing unit and a production unit. The Company has an annual capacity of producing 17,500 MT per year, with 50 MT capacity on a per day basis.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s shareholding is held through an offshore investment company, Marylebone Management Limited (MML), incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. MML is now wholly owned by IDL Investments, which holds a ~59.62% stake in E-Vision. The remaining 40.38% stake lies with Mr. Abdul Ghaffar (CEO). IDL Investments is 100% owned by Mr. Kashif Naseem Afzal, whose career has primarily focused on the natural resources sector, including base and precious metals mining. He has also built a diverse investment portfolio across power generation, energy transition, natural resources, and real estate.


Stability

The Company does have a succession plan. Marylebone Management Limited and E-Vision will be managed by other family members who have varied experience in business. Family includes Mr. Salim Ganny who is an investor and entrepreneur and his wife Mrs. Reema Ganny who has experience in corporate banking.


Business Acumen

Mr. Salman Ganny, who previously held 100% ownership of Marylebone Management Limited (MML), continues to serve as Chairman and Director of E-Vision. He brings a wealth of experience across the real estate, steel, engineering, and textile sectors.


Financial Strength

Mr. Salman Ganny's paternal family is Ganny Rangoonwala and his maternal family is Tabani. Both families are reputable business families based in Karachi for over six decades. Mr. Ganny and his family have the ability and willingness to support the business and for this purpose, various guarantees have been issued.



Governance
Board Structure

E-Vision’s Board of Directors comprises three members. The Board is Chaired by Mr. Ganny. Mr. Abdul Ghaffar (CEO) and Mr. Arif Siddiqui (company CFO), who represents MML, are also on the Board.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Salman Ganny, the Chairman of the company, is an accomplished investor and entrepreneur with a presence in both Pakistan and the UAE. He has previously held management roles in real estate and investment companies overseas.



Board Effectiveness

Board meetings are held quarterly with full attendance of directors. Meeting packs are shared with directors beforehand which comprise relevant financial data for discussion. Meanwhile, quality of discussion disclosed in meeting minutes has room for improvement. There are no Board committees in place to assist the Board.


Financial Transparency

Hassan Farooq & Company are the external auditors of the company. The auditors are only QCR-rated. They have expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the company for the year ended December 31, 2025. The board has also set up an internal audit function.


Management
Organizational Structure

E-Vision has a lean organizational structure divided into various functional departments, namely: i) Production, ii) Procurement, iii) Marketing, (iv)Human Resources and Administration, and v) Finance. The Manager Finance reports to the CFO – Mr. Arif Siddiqui – while all other departmental heads and managers are reporting to the CEO – Mr. Abdul Ghaffar


Management Team

Mr. Abdul Ghaffar – company CEO – is a Chartered Accountant with over twenty two years of experience in various manufacturing concerns including glass, textile and industrial gases companies as well as experience in financial services sector. He is actively involved in day-to-day operations and decision making in the Company. The management team, though small in size, constitutes well-experienced, seasoned individuals.


Effectiveness

The Company has formed four management committees to assist decision making. While the Audit Committee and Human Resource Committee convene on need basis, the Management Committee and Procurement Committee meet monthly. Meetings minutes are properly documented. All departmental leads meet with the CEO daily to discuss day-to-day developments and issues.


MIS

E-Vision implemented BMA Complete Solutions V 1.2 in 2014 as an ERP solution to streamline the flow of information from all departments. The software provided by M/S Soft Consult comprises modules for inventory management, financial accounting, HR management, sales support, and fixed assets management while the production management module is being developed.


Control Environment

Daily reports regarding the Company’s receivables and payables position, purchases and procurement, and bank position are prepared and submitted to higher management. The Company also has a lab on its premises for quality testing of fibers to ensure quality control. Furthermore, an international certification has been acquired by the Company: Global Recycled Standard. The company is also ISO 9001 certified.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The industry operates within a largely import-parity pricing environment, limiting local producers' pricing power. Although domestic PSF prices remain broadly aligned with imported material, recent tariff rationalization measures have enhanced the competitiveness of foreign suppliers. Reductions in customs duties on PSF and PTA, alongside the removal of certain additional levies, have lowered import costs and accelerated market penetration by overseas producers. Consequently, imports increased to approximately 134,000 MT in 1QFY26, significantly outpacing domestic production of around 94,000 MT. The market continues to face pressure from low-cost suppliers in China, Indonesia, and Bangladesh, whose products remain competitive despite the presence of anti-dumping duties and other import-related charges. Concurrently, the rPSF segment is emerging as a high-growth niche within the broader polyester value chain, supported by rising sustainability requirements and increasing utilization of post-consumer PET waste. While still at an early stage of development, the industry has established a meaningful production base, with E-Vision, Pinnacle Fibre, Lasani, and Khalis Fibre collectively accounting for installed capacity of approximately 82,125 MTPA in FY25. The business model offers an inherent feedstock advantage by substituting virgin petrochemical inputs with recycled PET bottles, reducing exposure to PTA and MEG price volatility. However, operational economics remain sensitive to energy costs, as bottle collection, washing, sorting, and processing are electricity-intensive activities. Over the medium to long term, growth in rPSF is expected to be underpinned by expanding sustainability mandates from global apparel brands, increasing demand for recycled textile inputs, and gradual improvements in Pakistan's recycling ecosystem. As environmental compliance becomes a more prominent purchasing criterion across export-oriented textile markets, rPSF producers are well-positioned to benefit from the industry's ongoing shift toward circular and sustainable manufacturing practices.


Relative Position

E-Vision is one of the leading players in Pakistan’s recycled polyester staple fiber (rPSF) industry, operating alongside key competitors such as Lasani Fiber, Khalis Fiber, and Pinnacle Fiber. In FY25, the industry’s combined installed capacity stands at approximately 82,125 MTPA. Among peers, E-Vision and Pinnacle Fiber collectively hold the largest installed capacity at ~21,900 MTPA, marginally ahead of Lasani’s ~20,075 MTPA, while Khalis accounts for ~18,250 MTPA.


Revenues

The Company’s topline declined significantly in CY25, falling to PKR 1,117 million from PKR 1,438 million in CY24, reflecting an overall contraction of ~22% YoY. This decline was broad-based across both domestic and export segments, indicating weakening demand rather than isolated segmental pressure. Export revenue dropped sharply by ~37%, from PKR 87 million to PKR 56.4 million, suggesting reduced international demand or potential loss of export markets/competitiveness. Similarly, local sales, which remain the primary revenue driver, declined from PKR 1.59 billion to PKR 1.25 billion. This contraction in the core business is more concerning, as it indicates sustained pressure on domestic volumes or pricing. Overall, the revenue trend reflects weakening business momentum in CY25, with both export and domestic markets contributing to the downside, pointing toward structural or demand-side challenges rather than one-off fluctuations.


Margins

Margins showed a mild deterioration in CY25, though overall profitability remained relatively stable. Gross margin declined slightly to 17.2% in CY25 compared to 18.8% in CY24, indicating some pressure at the cost level, likely driven by either higher input costs or less favorable product mix. Operating margin also contracted from 13.5% in CY24 to 11.5% in CY25, reflecting the impact of lower gross profitability along with possible fixed cost absorption pressure amid declining revenues. Despite this, net profit remained broadly stable in absolute terms, with PAT at PKR 31 million versus PKR 38 million last year. Interestingly, net margin improved slightly to 2.8% in CY25 from 2.6% in CY24, suggesting better below-the-line efficiency, potentially due to lower finance costs, tax adjustments, or other non-operating items cushioning the decline at the operating level. Overall, while core operating profitability came under pressure, the bottom line remained resilient, indicating some offsetting efficiencies outside the operating segment.


Sustainability

The Company's primary export countries are China and Turkey but during the period exports of the company heavily declined due to low polyester price rates. Additionally, the company's management is considering the installation of a solar power system with a capacity of ~50 kilo watt within the next few months to reduce the power and energy costs to ~25% approx.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The net cash cycle extended further to ~276 days in CY25 from ~196 days in CY24 and ~154 days in CY23. This was driven by a rise in inventory days to ~381 in CY25 from ~226 and ~155 in preceding years. Trade payables remained elevated at ~135 days in CY25 versus ~79 days in CY24 and ~47 days in CY23, leading to gross working capital days rising to ~411 in CY25 from ~275 and ~201


Coverages

FCFO declined materially to PKR 90mn in CY25 from PKR 221mn in CY24, reflecting a notable weakening in operating cash generation. Although finance costs eased to PKR 86mn (CY24: PKR 131mn), the decline in cash flow outpaced the reduction in financial charges. As a result, FCFO/finance cost coverage compressed to 1.1x in CY25 versus 1.7x in CY24, indicating a tighter liquidity buffer and reduced capacity to service debt from core operating cash flows.


Capitalization

The capital structure remained leveraged with a gearing ratio of ~47.1% in CY25 (CY24: 46.9%). Borrowings continued to be concentrated in short term making up 82.3%  of total borrowigs from 95.5% SPLY.


 
 

Jun-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Dec-25
12M
Dec-24
12M
Dec-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 437 408 449
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,836 1,521 1,343
a. Inventories 1,266 1,062 721
b. Trade Receivables 87 99 286
5. Total Assets 2,274 1,929 1,792
6. Current Liabilities 871 580 515
a. Trade Payables 538 285 341
7. Borrowings 631 598 567
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 63 74 72
10. Net Assets 709 678 638
11. Shareholders' Equity 709 678 638
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,117 1,438 1,506
a. Cost of Good Sold (925) (1,168) (1,209)
2. Gross Profit 192 270 297
a. Operating Expenses (64) (77) (66)
3. Operating Profit 128 194 232
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 0 1 2
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 128 195 234
a. Total Finance Cost (86) (131) (137)
b. Taxation (11) (26) (45)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 31 38 52
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 90 221 247
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1 81 116
c. Changes in Working Capital 26 (113) (72)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 27 (31) 44
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 38 1 (31)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (66) 31 (15)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1) 1 (3)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -22.4% -4.5% -27.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 17.2% 18.8% 19.7%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.8% 2.6% 3.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 10.4% 7.6% 11.6%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 4.5% 5.7% 8.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 411 275 201
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 276 196 154
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.1 2.6 2.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.9 2.0 2.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 1.6 1.7
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 22.1 0.3 0.3
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 47.1% 46.9% 47.0%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 55.6 44.4 66.7
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 14.0% 22.3% 23.0%

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

Jun-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Jun-26

www.pacra.com