Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
12-Aug-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
12-Aug-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
12-Aug-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain YES
23-Aug-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Aug-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Tufail Chemical Industries Limited was incorporated in 1993 and commenced operations in 1995 as a public unlisted company. It is a family-owned and managed business, with the entire shareholding held within the Zubair family. As per the proposed structure, the shareholding is as follows; ~51% held by Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail, 20% by Mr. Salman Tufail, ~20% Mrs. Ghazala Zubair, ~4.5% by Ms. Fariha Nasir and ~4.5% by Syed Azfar Ali Nasir. Mr. Zubair Tufail serves as the Chairman of the Board, which is comprised entirely of his close family members.

Rating Rationale

Tufail Chemical Industries Limited (“TCIL” or “the Company”) is one of Pakistan's leading manufacturers of specialty chemicals, primarily engaged in the production and sale of surfactants and textile chemicals. The ratings reflect the Company's strong position in the domestic surfactants industry, underpinned by its diversified product portfolio, established relationships with multinational and local customers, and significant manufacturing scale. TCIL's current annual production capacity stands at ~53,838 MT for LABSA/SLES and 43,796 MT for textile chemicals. Pakistan's LABSA and SLES industry is characterized by a concentrated market structure, with four organized manufacturers accounting for an estimated annual LABSA production capacity of ~148,000 MT, while domestic SLES production is primarily led by TCIL and TMIL. Demand is driven mainly by the detergent, household cleaning, and personal care sectors. The industry remains heavily reliant on imported Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB), exposing manufacturers to foreign exchange movements, global petrochemical price fluctuations, and freight cost volatility. During FY26, elevated input costs arising from regional supply chain disruptions and higher shipping costs exerted pressure on margins, while the expiry of anti-dumping duties on imported LABSA is expected to intensify competition from regional suppliers. Going forward, steady downstream demand is expected to support industry growth, although profitability will remain sensitive to raw material price volatility, exchange rate movements, and import competition. Within this operating environment, the Company remains well positioned, supported by its established market presence, diversified product portfolio, and continued focus on operational excellence. During 9MFY26, net sales stood at ~PKR 9,016mln, representing a slight contraction to 9MFY25 sales of PKR 9,233mln. Though the decline was primarily attributable to lower sales volumes, it was partially offset by favourable price adjustments. Margins remained broadly stable during the period, supported by disciplined pricing and effective cost management despite persistent volatility in raw material prices. The Company's governance framework reflects scope for enhancement in Board independence, given its predominantly family-based composition. The formal establishment of an independent internal audit function would further strengthen the governance and internal control framework. The financial risk profile is characterized by modest coverages and cash flows, while the working capital cycle remains stretched. The capital structure remains leveraged, with short-term facilities utilized to finance working capital requirements. Going forward, the Company aims to further diversify its product portfolio through the introduction of higher value-added specialty chemicals while expanding its export footprint, particularly in the Central Asian Republics. Ongoing capital expenditure, including the installation of a dedicated stripping unit and a new dryer for powder-based products, together with energy-efficiency initiatives, is expected to enhance production capabilities, improve operational efficiency, optimize production costs, and support long-term profitability.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the Company’s ability to sustain its market position. Furthermore, sustained growth in revenues, and improvement in margins, as depicted in financial projections shall remain imperative.

Profile
Legal Structure

Tufail Chemical Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'TCIL' or 'the Company') was incorporated in 1993 under the Companies Act and commenced commercial operations in 1995. The Company is registered as a public unlisted company. Its principal business address is located in Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.The Company does not form part of a formal holding structure; however, it operates within the broader Tufail family business ecosystem. Following a group-level restructuring completed during FY24, the Company now operates as an independent entity under the Zubair family, separately from Tufail Multichem Industries Private Limited which is led by the Pervaiz family.


Background

The Tufail family's commercial history in chemicals predates the incorporation of TCIL and traces its roots to chemical trading activities. The family leveraged its distribution network to transition into manufacturing and formally incorporated TCIL in 1993, with production commencing in 1995. The growth trajectory of the Company has been predominantly organic, built on progressive expansion of manufacturing capacity in surfactants and specialty chemicals. A structurally significant corporate event occurred in FY24 when the two branches of the Tufail family undertook a formal division of the group's businesses. Under this restructuring, the Zubair family retained TCIL while the Pervaiz family assumed control of the separately constituted entity, Tufail Multichem Industries Private Limited. This restructuring resulted in a realignment of assets, related party exposures, and borrowing obligations that is visible in the Company's financial position across review periods. Prior to the restructuring, related party exposures on both the asset and liability sides were material; as of the year ended 30 June 2024.


Operations

The Company is principally engaged in the manufacturing and sale of specialty chemicals, primarily anionic surfactants, including Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (LABSA), Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulphate (SLES), and others. These products serve as key raw materials for the detergent, personal care, home care, and textile processing industries. The Company's production process is dependent on imported raw materials, particularly Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB), exposing operations to international commodity price volatility and foreign exchange fluctuations. TCIL has established long-standing relationships with leading FMCG manufacturers, industrial customers, and distributors, supported by a well-developed distribution network and technical expertise. The Company's cumulative installed production capacity stands at ~115,397 metric tons per annum. Its power requirement of approximately 1.3MW is primarily met through the national grid (K-Electric), supplemented by an installed 800kW solar power system, while diesel generators serve as a backup source to ensure uninterrupted operations. The operational strategy remains focused on maintaining high product quality, optimizing capacity utilization, enhancing manufacturing efficiencies, and expanding its customer base through product diversification and export market penetration


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Tufail Chemical Industries is a family-owned and managed business. The Company's shareholding is concentrated within the sponsoring family, with Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail holding the majority stake of ~51%. The remaining shareholding is distributed as follows: ~20% held by Mrs. Ghazala Zubair, ~20% by Mr. Salman Tufail, ~4.5% by Mr. Syed Azfar Ali Nasir, and ~4.5% by Mrs. Fariha Nasir.


Stability

The ownership structure demonstrates a high degree of concentration, with effective control vested in Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail, who also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The unified shareholding within the family eliminates the risk of hostile ownership transitions or inter-shareholder disputes from external parties. The involvement of the second generation is already evident through active participation in executive management, including representation at the level of Executive Director, which provides a degree of continuity in leadership succession.


Business Acumen

Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail has about six decades of experience in the chemical industry. He transformed the family's trading enterprise into one of Pakistan's largest surfactant manufacturing operations, demonstrating the ability to identify and execute a strategic transition from distribution to manufacturing over a sustained period. His standing in the broader business community is evidenced by his election as President of the Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry for 2017. The family has further diversified its commercial interests through various ventures, reflecting a willingness to explore adjacent business opportunities beyond the core chemicals segment.


Financial Strength

The Tufail family's collective net worth is reported at over ~PKR 1.4 billion, which provides a measure of financial capacity to support the Company under stress conditions if required. The family's financial interests span the chemicals manufacturing business under TCIL along with ventures in various other sectors. The financial strength of the sponsoring family is considered adequate relative to the Company's scale of operations.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors comprises three members, all of whom are drawn from the Tufail family. The board composition is entirely executive in character, with no non-executive or independent directors currently in place. Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail serves concurrently as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, meaning the roles of board chair and executive management head are not separated. The remaining two directors, Mrs. Ghazala Zubair and Mr. Salman Tufail, also hold executive positions within the Company. The board does not have independent oversight representation. The Company has indicated its intention to induct independent directors in the near future, which, if executed, would meaningfully strengthen the governance framework. No formally constituted board committees such as an Audit Committee or Human Resource and Remuneration Committee have been disclosed in the available information.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, holds a graduate degree and brings over six decades of cumulative experience in the chemical industry. His tenure spans both the trading and manufacturing phases of the Company's development, and he has been the primary driver of the Company's strategic direction and operational growth. He has also served in a representational capacity for the broader business community as President of the Pakistan Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Mrs. Ghazala Zubair serves as an executive director and is the spouse of the Chairman, contributing to the family-led governance model. Mr. Salman Tufail also serves as an executive director and represents the second generation of the Tufail family in the business, with active participation at the executive level. The board's collective skill base is concentrated in chemical industry operations and business management, with limited diversity in terms of independent financial, legal, or sector-specialist expertise.


Board Effectiveness

During FY25, members' attendance remained strong, and meeting minutes were formally documented. The Company's board is dominated by family members with no independent oversight. However, the Company is planning to induct independent directors in the near future.


Financial Transparency

M/S Naveed Zafar Ashfaq Jaffery & Co. are the external auditors of the Company. The auditor is listed in Category “A” of the SBP's panel of auditors and expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended June 30th, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company operates through five functional departments, each headed by an experienced Head of Department. All departmental heads report directly to the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail, who maintains direct oversight of day-to-day operations. The organisational model is centralised, with strategic and operational decisions concentrated at the CEO level. This structure reflects the family-managed nature of the enterprise and is consistent with its size and operational complexity. The delegation of authority framework is accordingly top-down, with functional autonomy at the departmental level operating within parameters set by senior leadership.


Management Team

Tufail Chemical Industries Limited is led by a seasoned management team possessing extensive industry knowledge and operational expertise. The Company is headed by its Chairman and CEO, Mr. Zubair Farid Tufail, who provides strategic direction and oversees overall business operations. He is supported by an experienced senior management team, including Mr. Asif Aziz, Chief Financial Officer, who brings over 36 years of experience in finance and corporate management, and Mr. Salman Tufail, Director – Procurement & New Projects, who possesses more than 22 years of experience in procurement, project execution, and operational management. Collectively, the management team has played a pivotal role in strengthening the Company's market position, enhancing operational efficiencies, and driving its long-term strategic objectives.


Effectiveness

The Company’s production facility is equipped with multiple quality control labs with real-time surveillance by the Director of Technical Operations to ensure optimal monitoring. The key management personnel meet on a weekly and monthly basis to proactively address operational issues.


MIS

The Company implemented ER Manager in 2012 as an ERP solution having 15 modules that can be mixed and matched as per business needs. The Company successfully upgraded its ERP by implementing the latest version of SAP which went live in May 2020.


Control Environment

The Company has in place a European automated system to control & monitor the Sulphonation process. Moreover, filling area surveillance is done through a dedicated system. The production details related to yield & quality for each product are shared with the senior management on a real-time basis.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid (LABSA) and Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulphate (SLES) industry is characterised by a concentrated market structure, with four organized manufacturers—Tufail Chemical Industries Limited (TCIL), Tufail Multichem Industries Limited (TMIL), Ittehad Chemicals, and Colgate-Palmolive's captive facility, accounting for an estimated annual LABSA production capacity of ~148,000 MT. Domestic SLES production is led primarily by TCIL and TMIL. Industry capacity utilisation is estimated at 75%–90%, translating into annual LABSA production of ~111,000–133,000 MT, reflecting adequate domestic manufacturing capacity with moderate spare headroom. Demand for LABSA and SLES is primarily driven by the detergent, household cleaning, and personal care industries, while textile processing represents a secondary end-use segment. The industry remains heavily dependent on imported Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB), the principal feedstock for LABSA, exposing manufacturers to foreign exchange volatility, fluctuations in global petrochemical prices, and changes in freight costs. During FY26, disruptions to Middle Eastern supply chains and elevated shipping costs resulted in higher landed costs for domestic producers, placing pressure on input costs and margins. Furthermore, the expiry of anti dumping duties on imported LABSA in January 2026 is expected to increase competitive intensity, particularly from regional suppliers including China, India, Indonesia, Iran, and South Korea. While SLES is relatively less exposed to import competition due to domestic production capabilities and customer-specific formulations, pricing across both products remains closely linked to international feedstock prices and exchange rate movements. Going forward, industry growth is expected to remain underpinned by favourable demographic trends and sustained demand from downstream consumer sectors. Nevertheless, manufacturers' profitability is likely to remain sensitive to raw material price volatility, currency depreciation, import competition, and the industry's continued reliance on imported feedstock.


Relative Position

TCIL occupies a well-established position within Pakistan's surfactants segment and operates the country's largest dedicated surfactant manufacturing facility with a cumulative installed capacity of ~115,397 metric tons. The Company is ranked among the top five chemical manufacturers in Pakistan by revenue and maintains direct commercial relationships with leading FMCG multinationals including Procter and Gamble Pakistan, Unilever Pakistan, and Colgate Palmolive, which provides a degree of demand visibility and pricing stability that smaller competitors cannot easily replicate. The principal domestic competitor in the surfactants space is Tufail Multichem Industries Private Limited, which, following the FY24 family restructuring, now operates as a separate entity with a production capacity exceeding ~100,000 metric tons. Ittehad Chemicals Limited, another publicly rated peer, maintains an annual production capacity of ~70,000 metric tons for LABSA and SLES. TCIL's competitive strengths reside in its scale, established client relationships, diversified product portfolio spanning LABSA, SLS/SLES, and textile chemicals, and its track record of supplying to quality-sensitive multinational buyers. These advantages are structural to the extent that replicating the client credibility and operational scale of TCIL would require significant time and capital investment by a new entrant.


Revenues

The Company's revenue declined by ~2.3%, standing at PKR 9,016mln during 9MFY26 (9MFY25: PKR 9,233mln) (FY25: PKR 12,152mln; FY24: PKR 8,769mln). Sales remained predominantly local, with the local market contributing ~99% of total revenue, while exports accounted for the remaining ~1%. During 9MFY26, the Company sold ~40mln units. On a quantity basis, the major contributors were Sulphuric Acid 98% (~36%), Sulphonic Acid 96% (~31.7%), and SLES 2 Mole (~5.4%). In value terms, Sulphonic Acid 96% remained the largest revenue contributor, accounting for ~57.7% of total revenue, followed by SLES 2 Mole, reflecting the relatively higher value addition of these products compared to the Company's other offerings.


Margins

Margins remained largely stable during 9MFY26, with the gross profit margin recorded at ~12.3% (FY25: ~12.4%; FY24: ~14.2%). The resilience in gross margins reflects the Company's ability to effectively pass on fluctuations in raw material costs while maintaining pricing discipline. At the operating level, the margin moderated slightly to ~6.1% during 9MFY26 from ~6.6% in FY25, primarily reflecting higher operating expenses. Consequently, the Company reported a profit after tax of PKR 112mln during 9MFY26 (FY25: PKR 148mln). Nevertheless, the net profit margin remained stable at ~1.2%, in line with FY25, underscoring the Company's ability to preserve overall profitability despite a challenging operating environment.


Sustainability

TCIL places significant emphasis on research and development, enabling it to develop a diversified portfolio of specialised surfactant variants tailored to specific customer requirements. This product innovation capability has strengthened the Company's competitive positioning and fostered long-standing relationships with a niche customer base comprising predominantly multinational corporations (MNCs), resulting in a stable order pipeline and recurring business.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company's working capital cycle remained stretched during 9MFY26, with gross working capital days increasing to 127 days (FY25: 120 days; FY24: 111 days). The deterioration was primarily attributable to a buildup in trade receivables, which rose to 85 days from 70 days in FY25, reflecting an extended collection cycle and a higher level of funds tied up in operations. Conversely, inventory days improved to 43 days (FY25: 50 days; FY24: 55 days), indicating relatively efficient inventory management; however, the improvement was insufficient to offset the pressure arising from slower receivable recoveries. Consequently, net working capital days remained elevated at 103 days (FY25: 103 days; FY24: 81 days), underscoring the Company's continued reliance on external financing to support its operating cycle. Trade payable days increased to 24 days (FY25: 17 days), providing additional supplier financing and partially mitigating working capital requirements. Nevertheless, the overall working capital position remained stretched, constraining liquidity flexibility and increasing dependence on short-term borrowings, particularly in a relatively high interest rate environment.


Coverages

Coverage metrics improved during 9MFY26, with FCFO-to-finance cost increasing to 1.7x (FY25: 1.5x; FY24: 1.6x). The improvement was primarily driven by a reduction in finance costs, which declined to PKR 314mln during 9MFY26 (FY25: PKR 471mln), largely attributable to the lower policy rate environment. Although FCFO remained broadly stable during the period, the lower financing burden supported an improvement in the Company's debt servicing capacity.


Capitalization

Total borrowings stood at PKR 3,622mln during 9MFY26, reflecting a 7.6% decline from PKR 3,921mln in FY25 (FY24: PKR 3,173mln). The borrowing profile remained predominantly short-term, with short-term facilities accounting for ~97.6% of total borrowings, primarily to finance the Company's working capital requirements. Consequently, the leverage ratio improved modestly to ~56.4% during 9MFY26 (FY25: ~58.6%; FY24: ~55.3%), supported by lower debt levels. The Company's equity base stood at PKR 2,801mln as at end-9MFY26, providing adequate support to its capital structure.


 
 

Aug-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 2,267 2,288 2,316 3,540
2. Investments 50 50 50 94
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 1,278
4. Current Assets 7,484 6,157 5,085 2,924
a. Inventories 1,291 1,513 1,830 818
b. Trade Receivables 2,765 2,826 1,806 898
5. Total Assets 9,801 8,495 7,451 7,835
6. Current Liabilities 2,853 1,321 1,207 1,647
a. Trade Payables 1,108 499 603 833
7. Borrowings 3,622 3,921 3,173 1,440
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 84
9. Non-Current Liabilities 524 485 468 604
10. Net Assets 2,801 2,767 2,603 4,060
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,801 2,767 2,603 4,060
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 9,016 12,152 8,769 17,004
a. Cost of Good Sold (7,908) (10,651) (7,520) (14,743)
2. Gross Profit 1,108 1,502 1,249 2,261
a. Operating Expenses (562) (705) (586) (1,149)
3. Operating Profit 546 796 664 1,111
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 2 (28) 40 (83)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 548 769 704 1,028
a. Total Finance Cost (314) (471) (473) (663)
b. Taxation (122) (149) (115) (212)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 112 148 116 153
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 515 673 722 1,014
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 515 227 244 311
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 (991) (1,759) 2,189
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 515 (764) (1,516) 2,500
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (130) (179) (99)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 109 1,706 (2,269)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 515 (785) 11 132
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -1.1% 38.6% -48.4% -1.4%
b. Gross Profit Margin 12.3% 12.4% 14.2% 13.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 1.2% 1.2% 1.3% 0.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 5.7% -2.6% -11.8% 18.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 5.4% 5.5% 3.5% 3.7%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 127 120 111 68
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 103 103 81 42
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.6 4.7 4.2 1.8
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 56.4% 58.6% 54.9% 27.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 72.0 58.2 40.6 34.3
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.9% 13.0% 19.1% 23.5%

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-26

www.pacra.com