Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
21-Aug-26 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Aug-25 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
15-Nov-24 A- A2 Stable Upgrade -
23-Aug-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Aug-23 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Originally established as M. A. Aleem Khan & Sons, Maaksons Engineering Corporation Limited has been operating since 1951 and was formally incorporated as a private company in 1984. The Company’s expertise spans roads and highways, bridges, residential and commercial buildings, and canals and tunnels. Its portfolio includes landmark projects such as 9th Avenue and Jinnah Avenue in Islamabad, the Islamabad Highway Signal-Free Corridor, Metro Lahore, the 29-storey Telecom Tower in Islamabad, Gulberg Green, the 3x210 MW Thermal Power Station at Muzaffargarh, and the Chashma Canal. The Board comprises six members, all from the sponsoring family, which also retains full ownership of the Company.

Rating Rationale

Maaksons Engineering Corporation Limited (“Maaksons” or “the Company”) has been a prominent player in Pakistan’s construction industry for over seven decades. Now led by the third generation of the sponsoring family, the Company operates through established offices in Lahore and Islamabad and benefits from management’s extensive experience in construction and real estate. Holding a no-limit contract license, Maaksons has a strong track record of executing turnkey projects and maintains a sizeable portfolio of investment properties across key locations. Originally established as a pure contractor, the Company has gradually expanded into developing and holding its own project portfolio. With economic activity showing signs of improvement, Maaksons continues to adopt a prudent approach to project selection, prioritizing contracts offering relatively quicker cash conversion and predictable execution timelines, while limiting exposure to projects susceptible to prolonged delays. In parallel, the Company is expanding its own project portfolio. The Lake City Meadows Project, a 50:50 joint venture near DHA Phase 4, is expected to contribute to the Company’s medium-term own portfolio outlook. In hand contracted projects include infrastructure development for Nawaz Sharif IT City and the Enertech Building, while a pipeline of new projects in Lahore and Islamabad provides further growth potential as legacy contracts approach completion. During 10MFY26, Maaksons posted revenue of PKR 5.27mln, while net profit increased sharply to PKR 1.31bln, supported by improved margins from a selective, higher-margin project mix. The financial profile remains conservative, characterized by low leverage, an equity base of PKR 6.9bln, and comfortable liquidity. This financial discipline, alongside the sponsors’ substantial property holdings, provides a meaningful buffer against sector volatility. The ratings reflect Maaksons’ experienced leadership, prudent project selection, sizeable land bank, and sustained profitability. These strengths are moderated by the inherent variability of revenue generation, occasional project execution delays, and delayed payment risk.

Key Rating Drivers

Going forward, the ratings will remain dependent on the timely completion of ongoing contracts, effective execution of newly undertaken projects, and continued development of the Company’s own project portfolio alongside a healthy pipeline of contracting projects. Maintaining sound corporate governance and the Company’s prudent financial profile will also remain important rating considerations.

Profile
Legal Structure

Maaksons Engineering Corporation Limited (“Maaksons” or “the Company”) was incorporated as a Private Limited Company in 1984 under the repealed Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The registered office of the Company is located in Garden Town, Lahore.


Background

The Company was established in 1951 by Mr. M. A. Aleem Khan and was converted into a private limited company in 1984. Since 1951, Maaksons has been engaged in the construction business, delivering numerous Public Works Development Projects. Over the years, the Company has successfully completed various strategic water management and irrigation projects, and subsequently expanded into infrastructure, commercial, and institutional construction. It has consistently demonstrated the ability to undertake large, complex projects and deliver them on time, within budget, and to the highest quality standards—often achieving early completions—earning recognition and awards from various authorities.



Operations

MAAKSONS specializes in a diverse range of construction projects, including roads and highways, bridges and overhead bridge structures, underpasses, mixed-use high-rise buildings, residential and commercial buildings, canals, tunnels, water, irrigation, dams and flood systems, oil and gas pipelines, industrial and prefabricated buildings, and workshop mill query system. The Company holds a “no limit” C-A license from the Pakistan Engineering Council, which allows it to undertake projects of any scale. Some of its notable achievements include the construction of the Community Center, Penta Square Appartments and Prism-9 at DHA Lahore, recently started Lake City Medows project, NSIT - CBD project,  the Signal Free Corridor on Islamabad Highway and in DHA Lahore, the Metro Bus Corridor in Lahore, the Underpass at Bedian Road, Lahore, Widening & Improvement of Main Sheikhupura Road and Sharaqpur Road, Constr. & Rehabilitation of Islamabad Expressway from Faizabad Interchange to Koral Chowk, the 29-Storey Telecom Tower in Islamabad, Construction of 165 Bedded Integrated Medical Care Hospital, DHA, Construction of 12 Storey Park & Ride Parking Plaza, Liberty Market, Lahore, Design & Built Access Command, Control Center and Infrastructure Development for Diplomatic Enclave, Islamabad, Thermal the 3x210 MW Power Station in Muzaffargarh, and the Chashma Canal, among others. After exploring real estate development, the Company has refocused on its forte: infrastructure-based construction projects.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Maaksons is entirely a family-owned business where the third generation has also joined in recent years. Mr. M. Aleem Khan was the founder of the Company, and after his demise, his eldest son, Mr. Waseem, has emerged as the man at the last mile. The shareholding structure is divided among Mr. M. Aleem Khan's sons, their wives, and his grandsons. Specifically, 5% of Mr. M. Aleem Khan's shares were equally distributed among his sons, increasing their individual stakes to 17.5% each. The wives of the sons each hold 2.5%, while the four grandsons have 15% ownership each. The Company’s hierarchy maintains clear lines of authority, with Mr. Aleem Khan’s sons and grandsons overseeing their respective areas of responsibility.


Stability


Ownership has remained with the sponsoring family since the Company’s inception, and no changes are anticipated in the near future. Although there is no formal succession plan in place, a verbal understanding and the clear division of responsibilities among family members contribute to stability in the ownership structure. Currently, Mr. Wasim, the CEO, oversees all matters with support from Mr. Ahsan in the next tier.


Business Acumen

The sponsoring family has been in the construction industry for many decades. The sponsors possess a comprehensive understanding of the business, as they are actively involved in the day-to-day operations.


Financial Strength

MAAKSONS has a sound financial profile, supported by several subsidiaries, including MAAKCRETE, MAAK Asphalt, and MAAK Gas, which primarily serve the parent organization. The Company also holds strategic investments in Lake City Meadows and Garden Square, while the sponsors, both independently and through the Company, maintain a substantial property bank across various locations, providing further strength and stability to the financial profile.


Governance
Board Structure

The overall control of the Company rests with a six-member board, which includes two senior directors: Mr. Waseem Khan and Mr. Nadeem Khan, both sons of the late Mr. M. Aleem Khan. The four grandsons of Mr. Aleem Khan serve as executive directors.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Waseem Khan and Mr. Nadeem Khan have had a long-standing association with the Company. Their elder sons, Mr. Ahsan Aleem Khan and Mr. Zunair Aleem Khan, bring extensive experience in the construction industry, while the younger sons, Mr. Shazer Aleem Khan and Mr. Shahnawaz Aleem Khan, are relatively new to the field.


Board Effectiveness

The Board members are actively involved in the planning and execution of the business projects and overseeing the operations on a regular basis. All six male family members hold executive roles within the Company. The board structure could benefit from the addition of independent members to enhance oversight and governance.


Financial Transparency

M/s. Kamran & Co. Chartered Accountants serve as the external auditors for the Company. They issued an qualified audit opinion with an emphasis of matter paragraph on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2025.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's operations are divided into two regions: Islamabad and Lahore, each operating independently. The head office is located in Lahore, while the regional office is in Islamabad. Business related to the Lahore region is managed by Mr. Waseem Khan and his two sons, while the Islamabad region is overseen by Mr. Nadeem Khan and his two sons. This structure clearly demarcates the responsibilities between the regions. Accounts for both regions are maintained separately and consolidated at the MAAKSONS level.


Management Team

The board members are supported by an experienced team. Mr. Waseem Khan serves as the CEO of the Company. Descending tier, the team includes Mr. Aamir Chaudhry, General Manager of Construction; Mr. Anwar Cheema, Head of the QS (Quantity Surveying) Section; Mr. Saad Ahmed Farooqi, Regional Manager; Mr. Hamza Mehmood, Manager of Contracts & Operations; and Mr. Iqbal Gabol, Chief Financial Officer. All these department heads are supervised by Directors Mr. Ahsan Aleem Khan and Mr. Zunair Aleem Khan in their respective regions.


Effectiveness

The management functions are clear and well-defined, ensuring the effective achievement of the Company's goals and objectives. The board members closely oversee the team to ensure successful execution. Additionally, the board plays an active role in preparing project bids, with detailed meetings held for this purpose. The management holds regular meetings to discuss Company affairs, though the documentation of these meetings is not formalized.


MIS

MAAKSONS currently uses the Axiom ERP System to generate daily reports and track project-specific progress. This web-based system is accessible to all staff working on the projects and provides reports on various aspects such as suppliers, procurement, inventory, and more.


Control Environment

MAAKSONS adheres to strict quality control standards, recognizing their importance in the construction industry. The Company maintains a comprehensive Management Information System (MIS) to enable the management to track activities across various project sites. While a system of internal control is in place, continuous review by an internal audit department would further improve the effectiveness of the management.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's construction sector is exhibiting a gradual recovery, with the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) remaining the major demand driver, followed by private investment. The proposed FY27 PSDP stands at PKR 1,126 billion, marking an increase of approximately 34.5% YoY over the revised FY26 allocation of PKR 837.2 billion. Under the proposed FY27 PSDP, Infrastructure has been allocated PKR 729.9 billion, representing approximately 65% of the total outlay, with Transport & Communication receiving the largest share at PKR 408.9 billion, followed by Water at PKR 140.4 billion and Energy at PKR 135.6 billion. Despite continued constraints on non-PSDP development spending due to tight fiscal policy and IMF commitments, prioritized infrastructure projects continue to offer selective opportunities for construction firms. Construction sector activity remained resilient, recording growth of 5.73% in FY26 compared with overall GDP growth of 3.7%, supported by private-sector activity and government spending, while cement demand, a key indicator of construction activity, rose approximately 10% YoY.Over the medium term, supported by urbanization, population growth, CPEC-related infrastructure development, improving demand for cement and steel, and gradual macroeconomic stabilization, the construction sector is expected to maintain a stable growth trajectory, although its performance will remain dependent on continued public infrastructure investment and easing fiscal and geopolitical pressures.


Relative Position

MAAKSON benefits from its sponsors' ventures into related businesses within the construction and real estate development sectors. This diversification provides a strategic edge over its peers, as the Company can efficiently utilize in-house resources, optimize costs, and generate steady income streams. This integrated business model not only enhances MAAKSON’s operational efficiency but also contributes to sustained financial performance.


Revenues

MAAKSON’s revenue stood at PKR 5,273mln during 10MApr-26, compared to PKR 5,466mln in FY25 and PKR 6,789mln in FY24. While the topline remained relatively moderate during the period under review, the Company reported a notable improvement in profitability, with net income reaching PKR 1,312mln during 10MApr-26, compared to PKR 460mln in FY25 and PKR 318mln in FY24. The improvement in earnings is attributable to the Company's focus on executing projects with relatively stronger margins and improved operational efficiency.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     As apprised by the management, MAAKSON continues to undertake infrastructure and real estate development projects across key locations while maintaining a selective bidding strategy focused on projects offering favourable cash flow characteristics. The ongoing project pipeline, together with recently secured contracts, is expected to support business activity and provide visibility to the Company's revenue base over the medium term.


Margins

According to the 10MApr-26 financials, MAAKSON recorded a gross margin of 34.9%, reflecting a significant improvement compared to 10.6% in FY25 and 10.9% in FY24. Net profit margin also strengthened to 24.9% during 10MApr-26, compared to 8.4% in FY25 and 4.7% in FY24. The improved profitability reflects the Company's disciplined project selection strategy and efficient execution of ongoing contracts. Management continues to remain selective in project acquisition, with emphasis on ventures offering healthy margins, efficient execution and timely cash conversion, thereby supporting sustainable profitability and overall financial performance.


Sustainability

Management is optimistic about securing a significant share of projects funded under the Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) and the Infrastructure Development Authority of Punjab (IDAP), which could further strengthen the project pipeline. Furthermore, several large projects are currently in the pre-qualification phase, with management expressing confidence in securing these contracts. However, the successful awarding and timely execution of these projects will be crucial for sustaining revenue growth and protecting profit margins, ensuring long-term financial stability and operational success.


Financial Risk
Working capital

MAAKSON relies primarily on internally generated cash flows and available short-term borrowing facilities to meet its working capital requirements. The Company maintains adequate access to funded credit lines, which are utilized as required to support operational needs. In terms of operational efficiency, MAAKSON reported net working capital days of 42 days in 10M Apr-26, compared to 9 days in FY25 and 7 days in FY24, mainly reflecting higher trade receivables associated with the execution of ongoing projects. As the Company's project portfolio continues to expand, efficient management of working capital and prudent utilization of available banking facilities will remain important to support operational stability and sustain future growth.


Coverages

In 10MFY26, MAAKSON demonstrated continued strengthening in financial performance, with free cash flows (FCFO) reaching PKR 1,350 million and EBITDA recorded at PKR 1,766 million, both considerably higher than the PKR 160 million and PKR 511 million reported in FY25. This reflects the Company's enhanced operational efficiency and improved profitability. The interest coverage ratio rose further to 26.3x in 10MFY26, compared to 5.8x in FY25 and 5.2x in FY24, driven by higher core operating profits alongside a decline in finance costs, which reduced to PKR 69 million in 10MFY26 from PKR 91 million in FY25 and PKR 131 million in FY24. This continues to indicate MAAKSON's strengthened ability to meet interest obligations, reflecting improved financial stability.


Capitalization

MAAKSON’s equity base has shown steady growth, increasing from PKR 4.9bln in FY24 to PKR 5.6bln in FY25 and further to PKR 6.9bln in 10MApr-26. This upward trend in equity reflects the Company's strengthened financial foundation and accumulation of retained earnings. Total borrowings, including lease liabilities, stood at PKR 623mln in 10MApr-26, compared to PKR 899mln in FY25, PKR 596mln in FY24, and PKR 539mln in FY23. The debt-to-debt plus equity ratio declined to 8.3% in 10MApr-26, compared to 13.9% in FY25 and 10.8% in FY24. The Company's borrowings continue to be primarily composed of short-term borrowings.


 
 

Aug-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Apr-26
10M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,459 3,306 3,121 2,703
2. Investments 1,353 1,353 1,180 19
3. Related Party Exposure 232 232 243 760
4. Current Assets 3,968 3,325 2,182 2,500
a. Inventories 0 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 1,409 667 608 446
5. Total Assets 9,012 8,216 6,727 5,982
6. Current Liabilities 909 1,361 854 989
a. Trade Payables 53 396 622 156
7. Borrowings 623 899 596 539
8. Related Party Exposure 272 72 114 131
9. Non-Current Liabilities 314 301 239 47
10. Net Assets 6,896 5,584 4,924 4,277
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,896 5,584 4,924 4,277
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,273 5,466 6,789 3,135
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,432) (4,885) (6,046) (2,566)
2. Gross Profit 1,841 581 743 570
a. Operating Expenses (115) (176) (178) (155)
3. Operating Profit 1,725 405 565 415
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 14 513 403 67
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,739 918 968 482
a. Total Finance Cost (69) (91) (131) (86)
b. Taxation (358) (367) (519) 12
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 1,312 460 318 408
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,350 160 35 294
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 1,281 76 (90) 207
c. Changes in Working Capital (1,887) 327 176 (248)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities (606) 403 86 (41)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (180) (227) (36) (88)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (261) 256 (24) (41)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period (1,048) 433 26 (170)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 28.6% -19.5% 116.5% 137.8%
b. Gross Profit Margin 34.9% 10.6% 10.9% 18.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 24.9% 8.4% 4.7% 13.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) -10.2% 8.9% 3.1% 1.5%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 28.0% 8.7% 6.9% 9.8%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 54 43 28 50
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 42 9 7 32
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 4.4 2.4 2.6 2.5
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 26.3 5.8 5.2 6.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 17.1 1.4 0.3 3.2
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.0 1.3 -1.2 0.2
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 8.3% 13.9% 10.8% 11.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 92.9 89.9 48.3 40.1
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.1% 11.0% 21.2% 14.9%

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

Aug-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Aug-26

www.pacra.com