Profile
Legal Structure
Global Marketing Services (hereinafter referred to as 'GMS' or 'the firm') was established as a partnership in March 1999 and is registered under the Partnership Act, 1932. Its registered office is situated at 111, Hali Road, Westridge 1, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The firm operates through two distinct business divisions, namely the Clinical Division and the Medical Division, each with a separately constituted ownership structure.
Background
GMS was established in 1999 with a mandate to supply healthcare, diagnostic, and life science solutions to Pakistan's public and private sector healthcare institutions. Over the course of more than two decades, the firm has progressively expanded its product footprint across biomedical research, life sciences, clinical diagnostics, industrial diagnostics, interventional techniques, medical devices, biologicals, and pharmaceuticals. Growth has been primarily organic, underpinned by the successive addition of exclusive international principal agreements that have deepened the firm's technical capabilities and broadened its product portfolio. A dedicated cardiac division was subsequently added to supply consumables for cardiac medical devices, further diversifying revenue sources. The firm became a member of the multinational business network viSole, which has established operations in more than ten countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. In FY24, the Medical Division recorded meaningful volume growth following the addition of the Abbott Medical portfolio, representing a significant commercial milestone in the firm's expansion trajectory. The sponsors have resolved to consolidate the two divisions under a single corporate entity, with the corporatization process already underway as of the period under review.
Operations
GMS operates through two primary business
divisions, Clinical and Medical. The Clinical Division focuses on laboratory
diagnostic and testing equipment, encompassing core and molecular diagnostics,
Onco DX, and clinical genomics, while the Medical Division specialises in
cardiology, electrophysiology, surgical connections, and infection prevention
technologies. Following the corporatization of both divisions into a single
consolidated entity, GMS is expected to report performance on a consolidated
basis going forward rather than by individual division. The firm sources all of
its inventory through imports from over 30 international manufacturers,
including exclusive partnerships with Abbott, Johnson and Johnson, Steris,
Biomerieux, and Cordis, among others. As GMS imports the entirety of its
inventory, it carries inherent exposure to currency fluctuations, which the
firm mitigates through long-term supply contracts with major customers that
allow products to be priced in line with prevailing USD exchange rates. The
firm maintains a nationwide distribution footprint with a presence across all
major cities including Rawalpindi, Peshawar, Lahore, Karachi, Quetta, and
Hyderabad. GMS works with 29 distributors across Pakistan and has indicated
plans to expand this network further. Key customers in the Clinical Division
include Aga Khan Hospital, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Chughtai
Lab, and Dow University Karachi, while the Medical Division serves institutions
such as Punjab Institute of Cardiology and National Institute of Cardiovascular
Disease, Karachi. The firm is recognized as the first medical entity in
Pakistan to have achieved certifications for ISO 9001:2015 and Good
Distribution Practice for Medical Devices.
Ownership
Ownership Structure
GMS maintains distinct ownership structures
across its two operating divisions. In the Clinical Division, Mr. Zafar Mehmood
holds the majority stake of ~68%, Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds ~20%, and Ms. Naheed
Dilshad holds the remaining ~12%. In the Medical Division, Mr. Zafar Mehmood
holds ~60%, Ms. Naheed Dilshad holds ~32%, and Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds ~8%. All
three partners are Pakistani nationals. Mr. Zafar Mehmood, as the majority
stakeholder in both divisions and the Group Chief Executive Officer of the
viSole Group of Companies, exercises effective strategic control over the
firm's direction and operations.
Stability
The partnership between Mr. Zafar Mehmood and
Mr. Muhammad Ayub has remained intact for over two decades, providing a stable
ownership foundation. A formal partnership agreement governs the relationship
between the sponsors.
Business Acumen
The sponsors of GMS collectively bring over
two decades of expertise in Pakistan's healthcare and life sciences sector, as
detailed under Members' Profile. Mr. Zafar Mehmood's leadership, as Group Chief
Executive Officer of the viSole Group of Companies, has extended operations
across more than ten countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, with
subsidiaries and affiliates including viSole FZC UAE, viSole Pakistan, UAB
EuroGenomics, LDS Pvt. Ltd. Pakistan, viSole Canada, and Maefco Food Pakistan,
underpinned by a strategic focus on introducing affordable and innovative
solutions in medical devices, diagnostics, pathology, oncology, vaccines, and
biologicals. Mr. Muhammad Ayub's long-standing association with GMS has
contributed meaningfully to the firm's sustained market presence, while Ms.
Naheed Dilshad adds clinical and technical perspective to ownership
deliberations.
Financial Strength
The sponsors' financial capacity is
considered adequate. Their willingness and ability to inject capital into the
business have been demonstrated through historical capital contributions made
to support divisional expansion. The presence of the viSole Group of Companies,
a diversified healthcare conglomerate with an established international
footprint, provides an additional layer of financial resilience and reinforces
the sponsors' capacity to extend extraordinary support to GMS should
operational or liquidity stress materialise, as reflected in the steady equity
accumulation.
Governance
Board Structure
The governance structure
of GMS consists of the three founding sponsors who collectively constitute the
Board of Directors. The members include Mr. Zafar Mehmood in the role of Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Muhammad Ayub in the role of Director of Operations, and
Ms. Naheed Dilshad as a board member. As GMS operates as a registered
partnership, formal compliance with corporate governance codes applicable to
listed entities is not mandatory. No independent directors have been appointed,
and no formal board committees covering audit, human resource, or remuneration
functions have been constituted. The Chairman and CEO roles are not separately
held, as Mr. Zafar Mehmood fulfils both functions, representing an area where
governance practices could be further strengthened through the separation of
oversight and executive responsibilities.
Members’ Profile
Mr. Zafar Mehmood holds
an MBA and a Master's degree in English Literature and brings over 23 years of
entrepreneurial and executive management experience in healthcare and life
sciences. He oversees the strategic direction of both GMS and the viSole Group
of Companies from its corporate office in the United Arab Emirates, with
demonstrated experience in establishing and managing multinational business
operations across Asia, Europe, and North America. Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds an
MBA and has over 23 years of operational and strategic experience accumulated
through his association with GMS, contributing directly to the firm's
commercial and operational management. Ms. Naheed Dilshad is a qualified
medical graduate holding an MBBS degree with extensive professional experience,
bringing clinical and technical expertise to the board that supports alignment
between business strategy and healthcare industry best practices. The board
composition reflects strong sector knowledge and long-standing institutional
familiarity; however, the absence of independent directors limits the breadth
of external oversight and independent challenge available to management.
Board Effectiveness
The current board
structure operates without formal board committees, which constrains the depth
of structured oversight across financial reporting, audit, and compensation
matters. The Chief Executive Officer convenes regular meetings with
departmental heads to review performance, monitor progress against operational
and financial targets, and set strategic direction, which provides a functional
substitute for committee-level governance. However, the absence of an
independent chairperson, independent directors, and formally constituted
committees, including an audit committee with defined oversight of
related-party transactions, represents a structural governance gap relative to
best practice standards.sight over such transactions. No formal board evaluation mechanism has been identified. Governance improvement will be a natural outcome of the planned corporatization process.
Financial Transparency
The external audit of
GMS is conducted by Suriya Nauman Rehan and Co., Chartered Accountants, a firm
listed in Category 'B' on the State Bank of Pakistan's panel of auditors. The
auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on the annual financial statements
for the year ended 30 June 2025, indicating that the financial statements
present a true and fair view of the firm's financial position and performance.
No qualifications, emphasis of matter paragraphs, or going concern
modifications have been reported in the audit opinions over the review period.
GMS has also established an internal audit department that reports directly to
senior management and prepares monthly audit reports that are formally reviewed
by higher management, reinforcing the internal control framework and supporting
timely identification of operational and financial risks.
Management
Organizational Structure
GMS maintains a
structured organisational framework with clearly delineated functional
departments. The Chief Executive Officer occupies the apex of the reporting
hierarchy, with divisional and functional heads reporting upward to this level.
Key functional departments include Supply Chain, Operations, Sales and
Marketing, Information Technology, Finance, Quality Management, and Business
Development. The decision-making model is broadly centralised, with strategic
and material operational decisions resting primarily with the Chief Executive
Officer and the senior partners. Delegation of authority to functional
department heads governs day-to-day operations within defined parameters,
ensuring operational continuity across business lines.
Management Team
Mr. Zafar Mehmood, the
Chief Executive Officer, brings over 23 years of experience in healthcare and
life sciences and provides the strategic leadership underpinning GMS's growth
and expansion. Mr. Muhammad Ayub, Director of Operations and an MBA graduate,
contributes over 23 years of operational expertise and plays an integral role
in day-to-day management and strategic execution. Mr. Shahid Iqbal, Director
Sales and an MBA graduate, holds over 20 years of industry experience and is
responsible for nationwide sales strategy and market development. Mr. Majid
Jamal serves as Associate Director Sales with 15 years of relevant experience,
while Mr. Shahid Zaman Bhatti, General Manager Supply Chain, brings 20 years of
experience to the management of procurement and logistics functions. Mr.
Muhammad Afzal, an MBA graduate, joined GMS in December 2024 as Chief Financial
Officer and is responsible for overall financial strategy, planning, and
reporting, reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mukhtiar Ali
Bukhari, a qualified Cost and Management Accountant, serves as Finance Manager
under the CFO, supporting day-to-day financial planning and control. Key-person
risk is concentrated in Mr. Zafar Mehmood, whose departure would materially
impair strategic continuity and principal relationships. The broader management
team's long-standing association with the firm provides a degree of
institutional depth; however, a formally documented succession framework for
the Chief Executive Officer role has not been identified, representing a risk
that warrants management attention.
Effectiveness
Management has
demonstrated a consistent ability to expand the firm's principal portfolio,
maintain strategic alliances with globally recognised healthcare manufacturers,
and extend GMS's geographic and institutional reach within Pakistan. The
addition of the Abbott Medical portfolio in FY24 and the resulting growth in
Medical Division volumes reflect management's effectiveness in identifying and
executing commercial partnerships that drive revenue diversification. The
absence of formal management committees and a documented process for recording
minutes of management meetings remain areas that, if addressed, would
strengthen cross-departmental coordination and strategic accountability.
MIS
GMS has implemented SAP
9.3-based enterprise resource planning software, developed and deployed by M/S
Abacus Consulting. The system supports operational and financial oversight
across the firm's business divisions and enables real-time variance analysis
against operational and financial benchmarks. Senior management, including the
Chief Executive Officer, utilises well-structured Management Information System
dashboards to monitor business performance and support timely decision-making.
The platform facilitates performance tracking across key operational metrics,
enabling proactive management responses to emerging operational or financial
developments.
Control Environment
GMS operates a dedicated
internal audit department whose scope encompasses comprehensive compliance
audits across the firm's operational and financial functions. Audit findings
and instances of non-compliance are reported to senior management on a monthly
basis, ensuring continuous oversight and timely corrective action. The internal
audit function reports directly to senior management, which, while providing
operational proximity, may limit the independence of the function relative to
best-practice standards where audit reporting to an independent board-level
committee is preferred.
Business Risk
Industry Dynamics
The global medical
devices and diagnostics industry have entered a sustained growth phase, with
the global medical devices market valued at ~USD 678.88 billion in 2025 and
having reached ~USD 719.61 billion in 2026, on track to reach ~USD 1,209.42
billion by 2035, expanding at a compound annual growth rate of ~5.94% through
the forecast period. Growth is being driven by the rising global burden of
chronic diseases, demographic ageing, increasing adoption of artificial
intelligence enabled diagnostic platforms, and expanding demand for minimally
invasive procedures and connected healthcare solutions. In vitro diagnostics
held the largest segment share within the global market in 2025, accounting for
~16% of total market volume, while diagnostic centres represent the
fastest-growing end-user segment globally. North America retained market
leadership with ~38% to 40% of global revenue in 2025, while Asia Pacific is
identified as the fastest-growing regional market, supported by expanding
healthcare infrastructure and sustained government investment in medical
technology. Pakistan's medical devices market is projected to grow at ~8.57%
annually through 2029, reaching a market volume of ~USD 921.70 million,
reflecting growing demand for affordable medical devices as the country strives
to improve healthcare access across a large and underserved population.
Pakistan's pharmaceutical market surpassed PKR 1 trillion in annual value by
end of calendar year 2025, placing it among the largest industrial segments in
the country, with local manufacturers commanding over 70% of the domestic
market by value. The healthcare sector in Pakistan operates in a dual public
and private structure, with provincial governments bearing primary
administrative responsibility. Pakistan continues to face structural healthcare
challenges including limited per-capita healthcare spending, dependence on
imported medical equipment and consumables, significant foreign exchange
exposure at the industry level, and inadequate domestic healthcare
infrastructure outside major urban centres. The regulatory environment for
medical devices and diagnostics in Pakistan is governed by the Drug Regulatory
Authority of Pakistan. The imposition of a revised sales tax on previously
zero-rated medical devices in FY25 had increased effective costs for
distributors and dampened demand through much of FY26; however, the Budget
2026-27 introduced meaningful relief, abolishing the 3% value-added tax on
imported finished pharmaceutical and diagnostic products under the Twelfth
Schedule and cutting customs duties across 92 tariff lines, including full
exemptions on APIs used for cancer and other critical medicines, which is
expected to ease cost pressure on distributors including GMS going into FY27.
Separately, sector-wide import dependency has shifted further toward China,
which supplied over half of Pakistan's pharmaceutical and healthcare-related
import value in FY25, following the suspension of trade with India since 2025
amid cross-border tensions. The top credit risk factors endemic to this sector
include foreign exchange rate volatility given the high import dependency of
medical device distributors, regulatory and tariff changes affecting cost
structures, concentration risk arising from dependence on a limited number of
international principals, evolving competitive dynamics from lower-cost Chinese
entrants, and the sensitivity of public sector procurement to government budget
allocations and payment cycles. Technology disruption is an emerging
consideration, with artificial intelligence integration in diagnostics and the
proliferation of point-of-care testing platforms creating both opportunity and
competitive pressure for traditional distribution-oriented business models.
Environmental, social, and governance considerations are gaining importance
globally, particularly around supply chain ethics and product quality
standards, though their immediate regulatory impact on Pakistani distributors
remains limited.
Relative Position
GMS has established a
defensible competitive position in Pakistan's clinical diagnostics and medical
devices distribution sector, underpinned by exclusive alliances with more than
15 internationally recognised principals, including Bio-merieux, Abbott Medical,
Cordis, Johnson and Johnson Medical, and Steris Corporation. These exclusive
arrangements provide GMS with a structural competitive advantage that is
difficult to replicate in the near term, as they are governed by long-term
contractual relationships built over multiple decades. The firm's dual division
model, spanning both the Clinical and Medical segments, provides a degree of
revenue diversification not commonly available among smaller domestic peers.
The firm serves a high-quality customer base concentrated in both the public
and private healthcare sectors, including flagship tertiary care institutions
that provide stable and recurring demand. Competition in the sector has
intensified due to the entry of lower-cost Chinese diagnostic and medical device
suppliers, which puts pressure on pricing in certain product categories. GMS's
response to these competitive dynamic lies in its brand differentiation,
quality certifications, and the technical complexity of its product portfolio,
which reduces direct substitutability. Since the last review cycle, the firm's
relative positioning has been supported by the progressive recovery of demand
following the initial disruption caused by the imposition of a revised sales
tax on medical devices, with management anticipating that pricing adjustments
will progressively absorb this cost pressure through FY26.
Revenues
During 9MFY26, GMS
recorded sales of ~PKR 5,210mln, compared to ~PKR 5,282mln in FY25, reflecting
a year-on-year growth of ~31.5% over FY25, driven by the continued recovery of
demand in the Medical Division following the progressive absorption of the
sales tax impact on medical devices and growing volumes from the Abbott Medical
portfolio. Revenue quality is supported by the firm's long-term contractual
relationships with major healthcare institutions, which provide a degree of
revenue recurrence and reduce customer concentration risk at the individual
account level. Revenue concentration at the segment level warrants ongoing
monitoring given the dependence of each division on a limited set of exclusive
principal relationships. GMS's cost base reflects
reliance on a concentrated set of international principals. In the Clinical
Division, Biomerieux was the top vendor by import value (~PKR 1,386mln as of
Mar-26), followed by Illumina Netherlands BV and Leica Biosystems. In the
Medical Division, Cordis (~PKR 578mln) and Abbott Medical Hong Kong (~PKR 531mln)
together represented a majority of divisional imports as of Mar-26. This
concentration among a small number of exclusive suppliers exposes GMS to
disruption risk should any principal relationship terms change, though the
exclusivity itself is also a source of the firm's competitive advantage, as
discussed under Relative Position.
Margins
The gross profit margin
for the 9MFY26 stood at ~26.7%, compared to ~24.7% for the year ended FY25,
indicating a modest recovery in gross profitability as the elevated cost
pressures from the sales tax imposition and currency depreciation effects began
to normalise. The net profit margin improved meaningfully to ~10.1% for the 9MFY26,
compared to ~2.8% for FY25, with the improvement driven by lower finance costs
reflecting the declining interest rate environment in Pakistan during the
current fiscal period and by operating cost discipline. The entity's average
borrowing rate declined to ~11.9% for the Mar-26 period compared to ~19.8% for
FY25, reflecting the significant monetary policy easing in Pakistan over this
period and directly benefiting the firm's finance cost line. The operating
expense ratio has remained broadly controlled, with operating expenses of ~PKR
668mln for the 9MFY26 against ~PKR 703mln for the full year FY25, reflecting
cost management relative to the scale of revenues in the current period.
Sustainability
Management's strategy
for sustaining GMS's competitive position centres on deepening existing
principal relationships, expanding the distributor network from 29 partners to
a broader national footprint, and completing the corporatization of both
divisions under a consolidated private limited company by the end of FY26. The corporatization
initiative, if executed as planned, is expected to enhance governance
standards, facilitate structured capital access, and improve financial
transparency, all of which would positively influence the firm's long-term
competitive positioning. Management regularly reviews financial projections to
monitor performance against strategic targets and assess future growth
prospects.
Financial Risk
Working capital
The working capital
profile of GMS reflects the characteristics typical of a healthcare distributor
operating on credit-based terms with public and private sector institutions.
For the 9MFY26, the gross working capital cycle stood at ~190 days, an
improvement from ~245 days recorded for the FY25, indicating better aggregate
asset efficiency in the current period. The net working capital cycle similarly
tightened to ~82 days for the 9MFY26, compared to ~138 days for FY25,
reflecting more efficient management of the payable cycle relative to
receivable and inventory balances. Trade receivables as of 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR
2,144mln (FY25: ~PKR 1,919mln), while inventories stood at ~PKR 1,944mln (FY25:
~PKR 1,232mln). The increase in inventories reflects deliberate stock build-up
in anticipation of demand recovery, while the receivables growth is consistent
with higher annualised revenue throughput. Trade payables as of 9MFY26 stood at
~PKR 2,459mln (30 June 2025: ~PKR 1,673mln), reflecting the firm's utilisation
of supplier credit as a working capital funding mechanism. The current ratio
remained at ~1.7x as of 9MFY26 (FY25: 1.8x), indicating adequate short-term
liquidity. Related-party liabilities stood at ~PKR 794mln as of 9MFY26 (FY25: ~PKR
509mln), representing a material component of the current liabilities base and
reflecting intra-group funding arrangements.
Coverages
The free cash flow from
operations for the 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 425mln on a pre-working capital-change
basis, compared to ~PKR 429mln for the FY25. The EBITDA to finance cost ratio
improved substantially to ~11.0x for the 9MFY26, compared to ~6.6x for FY25,
reflecting the compounding benefit of declining interest rates and
strengthening operating profitability. The free cash flow from operations to
total debt service coverage ratio stood at ~3.8x for the 9MFY26, compared to ~5.2x
for FY25, with the variation reflecting changes in the debt servicing profile
across periods. The debt payback ratio, measured as total borrowings to free
cash flow from operations net of finance costs, stood at ~1.8x for the 9MFY26,
compared to ~1.5x for FY25, reflecting a modest increase driven by the
first-time appearance of a PKR ~68 million current maturity of long-term
borrowing during the period (FY25: nil), which shifted the debt profile from
short-term revolving facilities toward a long-term structure. The overall
coverage profile nonetheless demonstrates improved debt-servicing capacity,
supported by lower average borrowing costs and stable operating cash
generation.
Capitalization
Total borrowings as of 9MFY26
stood at ~PKR 68mln (FY25: ~PKR 30mln), reflecting a modest level of
institutional financial sector borrowing. The leverage ratio, measured as total
borrowings to total capital, was ~24.5% as of 9MFY26 against ~18.7% as of FY25;
this includes related-party liabilities of ~PKR 794mln within the capital
structure context, which represent sponsor-sourced funding rather than external
institutional debt. Excluding related-party liabilities, institutional
borrowings are minimal, confirming that the firm's capital structure remains
predominantly equity-funded with recourse to sponsor-provided non-funded
facilities for import letter-of-credit purposes. Shareholders' equity as of 9MFY26
stood at ~PKR 2,651mln, reflecting an increase from ~PKR 2,339mln as of FY25,
driven by retained profit accumulation. Equity quality is supported by retained
earnings rather than revaluation surplus. Non-current liabilities are nil
across all reported periods, indicating no long-term external debt obligations.
The firm's financial flexibility is supported by its low institutional
borrowing quantum, the availability of sponsor capital injections as a
demonstrated source of contingency funding, and the capacity to moderate
working capital investment as a lever for near-term liquidity management.
|