Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
18-Sep-26 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
19-Sep-25 BBB+ A2 Stable Maintain -
19-Sep-24 BBB+ A2 Stable Upgrade -
19-Sep-23 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
23-Sep-22 BBB A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

Global Marketing Services (GMS), established in 1999, is an experienced healthcare company operating across diagnostic and life science segments through alliances with leading global principals. Ownership is held by Mr. Zafar Mehmood, Mr. Muhammad Ayub, and Ms. Naheed Dilshad, with respective stakes of 68%, 20%, and 12% in the Clinical Division, and 60%, 8%, and 32% in the Medical Division.

Rating Rationale

Global Marketing Services (GMS or "the Company") has established a strong reputation within the clinical and medical laboratory equipment sector, which plays a crucial role in healthcare diagnostics. GMS operates through two distinct business divisions, Clinical and Medical, encompassing a diverse range of products including core and molecular diagnostics, Onco DX, medical and hospital solutions, and clinical genomics, with the Medical Division specialising in equipment related to cardiology, electrophysiology, surgical connections, and infection prevention technologies. The sponsors have completed the corporatization of both divisions under a single consolidated entity, Global Marketing Services (Private) Limited, marking the firm's transition from a partnership structure. Pakistan's medical devices and diagnostics market continues on an upward trajectory, supported by growing public awareness and greater accessibility to advanced diagnostic procedures. The Budget 2026-27 introduced meaningful relief for the sector, abolishing the value-added tax on imported finished pharmaceutical and diagnostic products and reducing customs duties on a wide range of tariff lines, which is expected to ease cost pressures on distributors, including GMS, going into FY27. Sector-wide import dependency has also shifted further toward China, following the suspension of trade with India. The assigned rating reflects the growth in the Company's topline, with sales of ~PKR 5,210mln recorded during 9MFY26 against ~PKR 5,282mln for full-year FY25, as the impact of the revised sales tax on previously zero-rated medical devices has progressively absorbed and demand has continued to strengthen. The Company's profitability margins improved further, with the gross margin rising to ~26.7% (FY25: ~24.7%) and the net margin strengthening to ~10.1% (FY25: ~2.8%), by effectively managing finance costs amid the declining interest rate environment and maintaining performance in the face of increasing competition from Chinese entrants in the market. The rating also derives comfort from the Company's strong relationships with over 15 globally recognized principals, including Biomerieux, Abbott Medical, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson Medical, and Steris Corporation, as well as a robust customer base comprising esteemed healthcare institutions in both the public and private sectors. The addition of the Abbott Medical portfolio continues to be instrumental in driving sales growth in the Medical Division, and management anticipates further gains in sales volume and profitability through this partnership. The Company currently works with 29 distributors across Pakistan and plans to expand its network further. The control environment is adequate, with an internal audit and compliance function that conducts regular audits to ensure adherence to established quality standards. As GMS imports all of its inventory, it remains exposed to currency fluctuations and related foreign exchange risks; however, the Company mitigates these risks through long-term contracts with major customers, allowing products to be priced in line with prevailing USD exchange rates. The current governance structure, while functional, lacks formal board committees and independent oversight, leaving room for improvement. The overall financial risk profile is supported by adequate cash flows, improved coverage metrics, and a tightened working capital cycle. The capital structure remains predominantly equity-funded, with minimal reliance on institutional borrowings; however, growing reliance on related-party funding, alongside non-funded facilities for the establishment of LCs, warrants continued monitoring.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are contingent on the firm's ability to sustain its top line, maintain profitability metrics, and generate sufficient cash flows to support growth. Successful execution of the proposed business and corporatization plan is critical, while continued improvement in the governance structure remains imperative.

Profile
Legal Structure

Global Marketing Services (hereinafter referred to as 'GMS' or 'the firm') was established as a partnership in March 1999 and is registered under the Partnership Act, 1932. Its registered office is situated at 111, Hali Road, Westridge 1, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The firm operates through two distinct business divisions, namely the Clinical Division and the Medical Division, each with a separately constituted ownership structure.


Background

GMS was established in 1999 with a mandate to supply healthcare, diagnostic, and life science solutions to Pakistan's public and private sector healthcare institutions. Over the course of more than two decades, the firm has progressively expanded its product footprint across biomedical research, life sciences, clinical diagnostics, industrial diagnostics, interventional techniques, medical devices, biologicals, and pharmaceuticals. Growth has been primarily organic, underpinned by the successive addition of exclusive international principal agreements that have deepened the firm's technical capabilities and broadened its product portfolio. A dedicated cardiac division was subsequently added to supply consumables for cardiac medical devices, further diversifying revenue sources. The firm became a member of the multinational business network viSole, which has established operations in more than ten countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. In FY24, the Medical Division recorded meaningful volume growth following the addition of the Abbott Medical portfolio, representing a significant commercial milestone in the firm's expansion trajectory. The sponsors have resolved to consolidate the two divisions under a single corporate entity, with the corporatization process already underway as of the period under review.


Operations

GMS operates through two primary business divisions, Clinical and Medical. The Clinical Division focuses on laboratory diagnostic and testing equipment, encompassing core and molecular diagnostics, Onco DX, and clinical genomics, while the Medical Division specialises in cardiology, electrophysiology, surgical connections, and infection prevention technologies. Following the corporatization of both divisions into a single consolidated entity, GMS is expected to report performance on a consolidated basis going forward rather than by individual division. The firm sources all of its inventory through imports from over 30 international manufacturers, including exclusive partnerships with Abbott, Johnson and Johnson, Steris, Biomerieux, and Cordis, among others. As GMS imports the entirety of its inventory, it carries inherent exposure to currency fluctuations, which the firm mitigates through long-term supply contracts with major customers that allow products to be priced in line with prevailing USD exchange rates. The firm maintains a nationwide distribution footprint with a presence across all major cities including Rawalpindi, Peshawar, Lahore, Karachi, Quetta, and Hyderabad. GMS works with 29 distributors across Pakistan and has indicated plans to expand this network further. Key customers in the Clinical Division include Aga Khan Hospital, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Chughtai Lab, and Dow University Karachi, while the Medical Division serves institutions such as Punjab Institute of Cardiology and National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi. The firm is recognized as the first medical entity in Pakistan to have achieved certifications for ISO 9001:2015 and Good Distribution Practice for Medical Devices.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

GMS maintains distinct ownership structures across its two operating divisions. In the Clinical Division, Mr. Zafar Mehmood holds the majority stake of ~68%, Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds ~20%, and Ms. Naheed Dilshad holds the remaining ~12%. In the Medical Division, Mr. Zafar Mehmood holds ~60%, Ms. Naheed Dilshad holds ~32%, and Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds ~8%. All three partners are Pakistani nationals. Mr. Zafar Mehmood, as the majority stakeholder in both divisions and the Group Chief Executive Officer of the viSole Group of Companies, exercises effective strategic control over the firm's direction and operations.


Stability

The partnership between Mr. Zafar Mehmood and Mr. Muhammad Ayub has remained intact for over two decades, providing a stable ownership foundation. A formal partnership agreement governs the relationship between the sponsors.


Business Acumen

The sponsors of GMS collectively bring over two decades of expertise in Pakistan's healthcare and life sciences sector, as detailed under Members' Profile. Mr. Zafar Mehmood's leadership, as Group Chief Executive Officer of the viSole Group of Companies, has extended operations across more than ten countries in Asia, Europe, and North America, with subsidiaries and affiliates including viSole FZC UAE, viSole Pakistan, UAB EuroGenomics, LDS Pvt. Ltd. Pakistan, viSole Canada, and Maefco Food Pakistan, underpinned by a strategic focus on introducing affordable and innovative solutions in medical devices, diagnostics, pathology, oncology, vaccines, and biologicals. Mr. Muhammad Ayub's long-standing association with GMS has contributed meaningfully to the firm's sustained market presence, while Ms. Naheed Dilshad adds clinical and technical perspective to ownership deliberations.


Financial Strength

The sponsors' financial capacity is considered adequate. Their willingness and ability to inject capital into the business have been demonstrated through historical capital contributions made to support divisional expansion. The presence of the viSole Group of Companies, a diversified healthcare conglomerate with an established international footprint, provides an additional layer of financial resilience and reinforces the sponsors' capacity to extend extraordinary support to GMS should operational or liquidity stress materialise, as reflected in the steady equity accumulation.


Governance
Board Structure

The governance structure of GMS consists of the three founding sponsors who collectively constitute the Board of Directors. The members include Mr. Zafar Mehmood in the role of Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Muhammad Ayub in the role of Director of Operations, and Ms. Naheed Dilshad as a board member. As GMS operates as a registered partnership, formal compliance with corporate governance codes applicable to listed entities is not mandatory. No independent directors have been appointed, and no formal board committees covering audit, human resource, or remuneration functions have been constituted. The Chairman and CEO roles are not separately held, as Mr. Zafar Mehmood fulfils both functions, representing an area where governance practices could be further strengthened through the separation of oversight and executive responsibilities.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Zafar Mehmood holds an MBA and a Master's degree in English Literature and brings over 23 years of entrepreneurial and executive management experience in healthcare and life sciences. He oversees the strategic direction of both GMS and the viSole Group of Companies from its corporate office in the United Arab Emirates, with demonstrated experience in establishing and managing multinational business operations across Asia, Europe, and North America. Mr. Muhammad Ayub holds an MBA and has over 23 years of operational and strategic experience accumulated through his association with GMS, contributing directly to the firm's commercial and operational management. Ms. Naheed Dilshad is a qualified medical graduate holding an MBBS degree with extensive professional experience, bringing clinical and technical expertise to the board that supports alignment between business strategy and healthcare industry best practices. The board composition reflects strong sector knowledge and long-standing institutional familiarity; however, the absence of independent directors limits the breadth of external oversight and independent challenge available to management.


Board Effectiveness

The current board structure operates without formal board committees, which constrains the depth of structured oversight across financial reporting, audit, and compensation matters. The Chief Executive Officer convenes regular meetings with departmental heads to review performance, monitor progress against operational and financial targets, and set strategic direction, which provides a functional substitute for committee-level governance. However, the absence of an independent chairperson, independent directors, and formally constituted committees, including an audit committee with defined oversight of related-party transactions, represents a structural governance gap relative to best practice standards.sight over such transactions. No formal board evaluation mechanism has been identified. Governance improvement will be a natural outcome of the planned corporatization process.


Financial Transparency

The external audit of GMS is conducted by Suriya Nauman Rehan and Co., Chartered Accountants, a firm listed in Category 'B' on the State Bank of Pakistan's panel of auditors. The auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on the annual financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2025, indicating that the financial statements present a true and fair view of the firm's financial position and performance. No qualifications, emphasis of matter paragraphs, or going concern modifications have been reported in the audit opinions over the review period. GMS has also established an internal audit department that reports directly to senior management and prepares monthly audit reports that are formally reviewed by higher management, reinforcing the internal control framework and supporting timely identification of operational and financial risks.


Management
Organizational Structure

GMS maintains a structured organisational framework with clearly delineated functional departments. The Chief Executive Officer occupies the apex of the reporting hierarchy, with divisional and functional heads reporting upward to this level. Key functional departments include Supply Chain, Operations, Sales and Marketing, Information Technology, Finance, Quality Management, and Business Development. The decision-making model is broadly centralised, with strategic and material operational decisions resting primarily with the Chief Executive Officer and the senior partners. Delegation of authority to functional department heads governs day-to-day operations within defined parameters, ensuring operational continuity across business lines.


Management Team

Mr. Zafar Mehmood, the Chief Executive Officer, brings over 23 years of experience in healthcare and life sciences and provides the strategic leadership underpinning GMS's growth and expansion. Mr. Muhammad Ayub, Director of Operations and an MBA graduate, contributes over 23 years of operational expertise and plays an integral role in day-to-day management and strategic execution. Mr. Shahid Iqbal, Director Sales and an MBA graduate, holds over 20 years of industry experience and is responsible for nationwide sales strategy and market development. Mr. Majid Jamal serves as Associate Director Sales with 15 years of relevant experience, while Mr. Shahid Zaman Bhatti, General Manager Supply Chain, brings 20 years of experience to the management of procurement and logistics functions. Mr. Muhammad Afzal, an MBA graduate, joined GMS in December 2024 as Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for overall financial strategy, planning, and reporting, reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mukhtiar Ali Bukhari, a qualified Cost and Management Accountant, serves as Finance Manager under the CFO, supporting day-to-day financial planning and control. Key-person risk is concentrated in Mr. Zafar Mehmood, whose departure would materially impair strategic continuity and principal relationships. The broader management team's long-standing association with the firm provides a degree of institutional depth; however, a formally documented succession framework for the Chief Executive Officer role has not been identified, representing a risk that warrants management attention.


Effectiveness

Management has demonstrated a consistent ability to expand the firm's principal portfolio, maintain strategic alliances with globally recognised healthcare manufacturers, and extend GMS's geographic and institutional reach within Pakistan. The addition of the Abbott Medical portfolio in FY24 and the resulting growth in Medical Division volumes reflect management's effectiveness in identifying and executing commercial partnerships that drive revenue diversification. The absence of formal management committees and a documented process for recording minutes of management meetings remain areas that, if addressed, would strengthen cross-departmental coordination and strategic accountability.


MIS

GMS has implemented SAP 9.3-based enterprise resource planning software, developed and deployed by M/S Abacus Consulting. The system supports operational and financial oversight across the firm's business divisions and enables real-time variance analysis against operational and financial benchmarks. Senior management, including the Chief Executive Officer, utilises well-structured Management Information System dashboards to monitor business performance and support timely decision-making. The platform facilitates performance tracking across key operational metrics, enabling proactive management responses to emerging operational or financial developments.


Control Environment

GMS operates a dedicated internal audit department whose scope encompasses comprehensive compliance audits across the firm's operational and financial functions. Audit findings and instances of non-compliance are reported to senior management on a monthly basis, ensuring continuous oversight and timely corrective action. The internal audit function reports directly to senior management, which, while providing operational proximity, may limit the independence of the function relative to best-practice standards where audit reporting to an independent board-level committee is preferred.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

The global medical devices and diagnostics industry have entered a sustained growth phase, with the global medical devices market valued at ~USD 678.88 billion in 2025 and having reached ~USD 719.61 billion in 2026, on track to reach ~USD 1,209.42 billion by 2035, expanding at a compound annual growth rate of ~5.94% through the forecast period. Growth is being driven by the rising global burden of chronic diseases, demographic ageing, increasing adoption of artificial intelligence enabled diagnostic platforms, and expanding demand for minimally invasive procedures and connected healthcare solutions. In vitro diagnostics held the largest segment share within the global market in 2025, accounting for ~16% of total market volume, while diagnostic centres represent the fastest-growing end-user segment globally. North America retained market leadership with ~38% to 40% of global revenue in 2025, while Asia Pacific is identified as the fastest-growing regional market, supported by expanding healthcare infrastructure and sustained government investment in medical technology. Pakistan's medical devices market is projected to grow at ~8.57% annually through 2029, reaching a market volume of ~USD 921.70 million, reflecting growing demand for affordable medical devices as the country strives to improve healthcare access across a large and underserved population. Pakistan's pharmaceutical market surpassed PKR 1 trillion in annual value by end of calendar year 2025, placing it among the largest industrial segments in the country, with local manufacturers commanding over 70% of the domestic market by value. The healthcare sector in Pakistan operates in a dual public and private structure, with provincial governments bearing primary administrative responsibility. Pakistan continues to face structural healthcare challenges including limited per-capita healthcare spending, dependence on imported medical equipment and consumables, significant foreign exchange exposure at the industry level, and inadequate domestic healthcare infrastructure outside major urban centres. The regulatory environment for medical devices and diagnostics in Pakistan is governed by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan. The imposition of a revised sales tax on previously zero-rated medical devices in FY25 had increased effective costs for distributors and dampened demand through much of FY26; however, the Budget 2026-27 introduced meaningful relief, abolishing the 3% value-added tax on imported finished pharmaceutical and diagnostic products under the Twelfth Schedule and cutting customs duties across 92 tariff lines, including full exemptions on APIs used for cancer and other critical medicines, which is expected to ease cost pressure on distributors including GMS going into FY27. Separately, sector-wide import dependency has shifted further toward China, which supplied over half of Pakistan's pharmaceutical and healthcare-related import value in FY25, following the suspension of trade with India since 2025 amid cross-border tensions. The top credit risk factors endemic to this sector include foreign exchange rate volatility given the high import dependency of medical device distributors, regulatory and tariff changes affecting cost structures, concentration risk arising from dependence on a limited number of international principals, evolving competitive dynamics from lower-cost Chinese entrants, and the sensitivity of public sector procurement to government budget allocations and payment cycles. Technology disruption is an emerging consideration, with artificial intelligence integration in diagnostics and the proliferation of point-of-care testing platforms creating both opportunity and competitive pressure for traditional distribution-oriented business models. Environmental, social, and governance considerations are gaining importance globally, particularly around supply chain ethics and product quality standards, though their immediate regulatory impact on Pakistani distributors remains limited.


Relative Position

GMS has established a defensible competitive position in Pakistan's clinical diagnostics and medical devices distribution sector, underpinned by exclusive alliances with more than 15 internationally recognised principals, including Bio-merieux, Abbott Medical, Cordis, Johnson and Johnson Medical, and Steris Corporation. These exclusive arrangements provide GMS with a structural competitive advantage that is difficult to replicate in the near term, as they are governed by long-term contractual relationships built over multiple decades. The firm's dual division model, spanning both the Clinical and Medical segments, provides a degree of revenue diversification not commonly available among smaller domestic peers. The firm serves a high-quality customer base concentrated in both the public and private healthcare sectors, including flagship tertiary care institutions that provide stable and recurring demand. Competition in the sector has intensified due to the entry of lower-cost Chinese diagnostic and medical device suppliers, which puts pressure on pricing in certain product categories. GMS's response to these competitive dynamic lies in its brand differentiation, quality certifications, and the technical complexity of its product portfolio, which reduces direct substitutability. Since the last review cycle, the firm's relative positioning has been supported by the progressive recovery of demand following the initial disruption caused by the imposition of a revised sales tax on medical devices, with management anticipating that pricing adjustments will progressively absorb this cost pressure through FY26.


Revenues

During 9MFY26, GMS recorded sales of ~PKR 5,210mln, compared to ~PKR 5,282mln in FY25, reflecting a year-on-year growth of ~31.5% over FY25, driven by the continued recovery of demand in the Medical Division following the progressive absorption of the sales tax impact on medical devices and growing volumes from the Abbott Medical portfolio. Revenue quality is supported by the firm's long-term contractual relationships with major healthcare institutions, which provide a degree of revenue recurrence and reduce customer concentration risk at the individual account level. Revenue concentration at the segment level warrants ongoing monitoring given the dependence of each division on a limited set of exclusive principal relationships. GMS's cost base reflects reliance on a concentrated set of international principals. In the Clinical Division, Biomerieux was the top vendor by import value (~PKR 1,386mln as of Mar-26), followed by Illumina Netherlands BV and Leica Biosystems. In the Medical Division, Cordis (~PKR 578mln) and Abbott Medical Hong Kong (~PKR 531mln) together represented a majority of divisional imports as of Mar-26. This concentration among a small number of exclusive suppliers exposes GMS to disruption risk should any principal relationship terms change, though the exclusivity itself is also a source of the firm's competitive advantage, as discussed under Relative Position.


Margins

The gross profit margin for the 9MFY26 stood at ~26.7%, compared to ~24.7% for the year ended FY25, indicating a modest recovery in gross profitability as the elevated cost pressures from the sales tax imposition and currency depreciation effects began to normalise. The net profit margin improved meaningfully to ~10.1% for the 9MFY26, compared to ~2.8% for FY25, with the improvement driven by lower finance costs reflecting the declining interest rate environment in Pakistan during the current fiscal period and by operating cost discipline. The entity's average borrowing rate declined to ~11.9% for the Mar-26 period compared to ~19.8% for FY25, reflecting the significant monetary policy easing in Pakistan over this period and directly benefiting the firm's finance cost line. The operating expense ratio has remained broadly controlled, with operating expenses of ~PKR 668mln for the 9MFY26 against ~PKR 703mln for the full year FY25, reflecting cost management relative to the scale of revenues in the current period.


Sustainability

Management's strategy for sustaining GMS's competitive position centres on deepening existing principal relationships, expanding the distributor network from 29 partners to a broader national footprint, and completing the corporatization of both divisions under a consolidated private limited company by the end of FY26. The corporatization initiative, if executed as planned, is expected to enhance governance standards, facilitate structured capital access, and improve financial transparency, all of which would positively influence the firm's long-term competitive positioning. Management regularly reviews financial projections to monitor performance against strategic targets and assess future growth prospects.


Financial Risk
Working capital

The working capital profile of GMS reflects the characteristics typical of a healthcare distributor operating on credit-based terms with public and private sector institutions. For the 9MFY26, the gross working capital cycle stood at ~190 days, an improvement from ~245 days recorded for the FY25, indicating better aggregate asset efficiency in the current period. The net working capital cycle similarly tightened to ~82 days for the 9MFY26, compared to ~138 days for FY25, reflecting more efficient management of the payable cycle relative to receivable and inventory balances. Trade receivables as of 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 2,144mln (FY25: ~PKR 1,919mln), while inventories stood at ~PKR 1,944mln (FY25: ~PKR 1,232mln). The increase in inventories reflects deliberate stock build-up in anticipation of demand recovery, while the receivables growth is consistent with higher annualised revenue throughput. Trade payables as of 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 2,459mln (30 June 2025: ~PKR 1,673mln), reflecting the firm's utilisation of supplier credit as a working capital funding mechanism. The current ratio remained at ~1.7x as of 9MFY26 (FY25: 1.8x), indicating adequate short-term liquidity. Related-party liabilities stood at ~PKR 794mln as of 9MFY26 (FY25: ~PKR 509mln), representing a material component of the current liabilities base and reflecting intra-group funding arrangements.


Coverages

The free cash flow from operations for the 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 425mln on a pre-working capital-change basis, compared to ~PKR 429mln for the FY25. The EBITDA to finance cost ratio improved substantially to ~11.0x for the 9MFY26, compared to ~6.6x for FY25, reflecting the compounding benefit of declining interest rates and strengthening operating profitability. The free cash flow from operations to total debt service coverage ratio stood at ~3.8x for the 9MFY26, compared to ~5.2x for FY25, with the variation reflecting changes in the debt servicing profile across periods. The debt payback ratio, measured as total borrowings to free cash flow from operations net of finance costs, stood at ~1.8x for the 9MFY26, compared to ~1.5x for FY25, reflecting a modest increase driven by the first-time appearance of a PKR ~68 million current maturity of long-term borrowing during the period (FY25: nil), which shifted the debt profile from short-term revolving facilities toward a long-term structure. The overall coverage profile nonetheless demonstrates improved debt-servicing capacity, supported by lower average borrowing costs and stable operating cash generation.


Capitalization

Total borrowings as of 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 68mln (FY25: ~PKR 30mln), reflecting a modest level of institutional financial sector borrowing. The leverage ratio, measured as total borrowings to total capital, was ~24.5% as of 9MFY26 against ~18.7% as of FY25; this includes related-party liabilities of ~PKR 794mln within the capital structure context, which represent sponsor-sourced funding rather than external institutional debt. Excluding related-party liabilities, institutional borrowings are minimal, confirming that the firm's capital structure remains predominantly equity-funded with recourse to sponsor-provided non-funded facilities for import letter-of-credit purposes. Shareholders' equity as of 9MFY26 stood at ~PKR 2,651mln, reflecting an increase from ~PKR 2,339mln as of FY25, driven by retained profit accumulation. Equity quality is supported by retained earnings rather than revaluation surplus. Non-current liabilities are nil across all reported periods, indicating no long-term external debt obligations. The firm's financial flexibility is supported by its low institutional borrowing quantum, the availability of sponsor capital injections as a demonstrated source of contingency funding, and the capacity to moderate working capital investment as a lever for near-term liquidity management.


 
 

Sep-26

www.pacra.com


(PKR mln)


Mar-26
9M
Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 1,340 1,152 444 462
2. Investments 0 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 5,098 3,917 4,711 3,685
a. Inventories 1,944 1,232 1,872 1,577
b. Trade Receivables 2,144 1,919 2,083 1,180
5. Total Assets 6,438 5,069 5,155 4,147
6. Current Liabilities 2,925 2,191 1,816 1,361
a. Trade Payables 2,459 1,673 1,450 1,088
7. Borrowings 68 30 69 0
8. Related Party Exposure 794 509 399 284
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 2,651 2,339 2,871 2,502
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,651 2,339 2,871 2,502
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 5,210 5,282 5,350 4,356
a. Cost of Good Sold (3,817) (3,976) (3,677) (3,108)
2. Gross Profit 1,393 1,307 1,673 1,248
a. Operating Expenses (668) (703) (656) (512)
3. Operating Profit 725 604 1,017 736
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) (43) (78) (472) (302)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 683 525 546 434
a. Total Finance Cost (150) (171) (149) (104)
b. Taxation (4) (204) (113) (158)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 528 150 283 172
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 425 429 254 257
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 425 429 254 257
c. Changes in Working Capital 0 1,289 (539) (272)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 425 1,717 (284) (14)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities 0 (1,043) (23) (9)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 0 (594) 86 (104)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 425 81 (222) (128)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 31.5% -1.3% 22.8% -4.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 26.7% 24.7% 31.3% 28.6%
c. Net Profit Margin 10.1% 2.8% 5.3% 4.0%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 8.2% 32.5% -5.3% -0.3%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 28.2% 5.8% 10.5% 7.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 190 245 229 218
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 82 138 142 136
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.7 1.8 2.6 2.7
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 11.0 6.6 2.9 5.7
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.8 5.2 1.8 3.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 1.8 1.5 3.5 1.5
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 24.5% 18.7% 14.0% 10.2%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 652.7 663.8 128.4 138.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 11.9% 19.8% 37.7% 39.6%

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

Sep-26

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Sep-26

www.pacra.com