Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
08-Oct-25 A A2 Stable Maintain -
11-Oct-24 A A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Oct-23 A A2 Stable Maintain -
13-Oct-22 A A2 Stable Upgrade -
22-Oct-21 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

Din Energy Limited (Din Energy) is part of the Din Group, a diversified Pakistani business house with established operations across textiles, real estate, finance, and energy. Incorporated in 2014, the company owns and operates a 50 MW wind power project in Deh Kohistan, Sindh. The total project cost amounted to USD 63.906 million, financed 80% through an equal mix of local and foreign debt. To date, Din Energy has successfully repaid around its local and its foreign borrowings, reflecting disciplined financial management and the project’s healthy cash generation. The company is overseen by a four-member Board of Directors led by Chairman Shaikh Muhammad Pervez, a senior leader of the Din Group with decades of business experience, and Chief Executive Officer Fawad Jawed, who brings strategic insight and operational expertise to the platform. Together, they provide cohesive governance and long-term direction for the company. The management team is led by experienced professionals such as Project Manager Mr. Mansoor Khan and Chief Project Coordinator Mr. Sohail Rana, whose technical and financial expertise underpin day-to-day execution. With sound governance, a balanced capital structure, and reliable execution, Din Energy is well placed to continue contributing to Pakistan’s clean energy transition.

Rating Rationale

Pakistan’s renewable energy sector continues to progress under the Alternative and Renewable Energy (ARE) Policy, which aims to diversify the national energy mix and reduce reliance on imported fuels. Projects have benefitted from lower-cost inputs and sovereign-backed commitments, but challenges remain, including delayed payments from CPPA-G, macroeconomic headwinds, and regulatory uncertainties. Against this backdrop, Din Energy Limited (Din Energy), a 50 MW wind IPP established in 2014 in Deh Kohistan, Sindh, has sustained reliable operational performance under a cost-plus tariff arrangement. In FY25, the plant delivered 111.42 GWh of electricity, compared to 108.96 GWh in FY24, reflecting a 2.26% year-on-year growth, these figures are reported excluding NPMVs. Operations are supported by global O&M partners Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (Pvt.) Limited and Orient Energy Systems (Pvt.) Ltd. Financial results remained stable, with revenue of PKR 1,825 million in FY25 versus PKR 2,313 million in FY24, reflecting seasonal factors and indexation-related adjustments. Receivables eased to PKR 571 million in FY25 from PKR 611 million in FY24, reflecting improved collections though inflows remain an important monitorable. Liquidity is supported by internal cash flows, improved receivable turnover, and access to working capital lines, while deleveraging has advanced with repayment of 17.5% of foreign debt and 32.5% of local obligations in FY25. Nonetheless, Din Energy’s financial risk profile remains characterized by high leverage, with borrowings comprising nearly three-fourths of capitalization and debt-servicing ratios sensitive to cash flow timing. Continued debt reduction and stronger cash flow generation will be key to enhancing long term resilience.

Key Rating Drivers

Din Energy’s credit profile is anchored by predictable tariff-based revenues, prudent financial discipline, and the expertise of its O&M operators, though the company remains exposed to sector-specific risks, particularly payment delays and potential regulatory shifts arising from power sector reforms. Going forward, sustaining generation output, improving receivable turnover, and advancing debt reduction will be key to preserving credit strength.

Profile
Plant

The 50 MW wind energy facility has been developed on a Build, Own, and Operate (BOO) model, spanning approximately 325 acres in Deh Kohistan, Sindh. The project is owned and operated by Din Energy Ltd (DEL), a Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer (RE IPP) functioning under the provisions of Pakistan’s Renewable Energy Policy 2006.


Tariff

Din Energy Ltd adopted the Cost-Plus Tariff mechanism for wind power projects as determined by NEPRA in 2019. As per the approved tariff structure, the project enjoys a generation tariff of PKR 7.33 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) for the initial 10 years, followed by a reduced rate of PKR 2.4026 per kWh from years 11 to 25. The levelized tariff, calculated at the time of financial close, is US Cents 4.7824/kwh. For the July to September 2025 quarter, NEPRA has revised the applicable tariff to PKR 13.9695/kWh, reflecting periodic indexation adjustments.


Return on Project

In alignment with NEPRA's regulatory framework, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for the project has been established at 14%.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

Din Energy is owned by Din Group and its founding family members; while shareholding is segregated as: Din Corporation Pvt Ltd and Din Ventures Pvt Ltd owned (31.67%) each, while Din Industries Management Pvt Ltd (5%), Shaikh Muhammad Pervez (15.8%), Ghazala Pervez (15.8%), Fawad Jawed (0.0002%), Farhad Shaikh Mohammad (0.0002%) and Irfan Muneer (0.0002%).


Stability

Din Energy operates under the umbrella of the Din Group, one of Pakistan’s well established and diversified business conglomerates. With a legacy spanning several decades, the Group has successfully expanded into the renewable energy sector with a clear focus on sustainable development. Its ventures in clean energy are backed by extensive business experience and in-depth sector knowledge, lending credibility and operational stability to Din Energy’s initiatives.


Business Acumen

The leadership team of Din Energy comprises seasoned entrepreneurs and professionals who bring decades of hands-on experience across diverse industries. Individuals such as Shaikh Mohammad Pervez, Fawad Jawed, Farhad Shaikh Mohammad, and Ghazala Pervez have held key leadership positions across textiles, energy and real estate. Their collective strategic insight, corporate governance capabilities, and track record of successfully running multiple enterprises speak to the Group's strong business acumen.


Financial Strength

The financial standing of Din Energy is reinforced by the robust and diversified business portfolio of its sponsors. The Din Group has established successful operations across high-value industries, which enables the company to ensure long-term financial sustainability and resilience. The Group’s proven ability to fund and support large-scale projects underlines its solid financial foundation.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors of Din Energy consists of four members, including the Chief Executive Officer. All members are directly associated with the founding family of the Din Group and also hold leadership roles across other companies within the Group’s portfolio. Their involvement across related entities ensures close alignment between Din Energy and the broader strategic direction of the Group, allowing for integrated decision-making and continuity in leadership.


Members’ Profile

The members of the board have a long-standing association with the Din Group and bring with them extensive experience across key sectors such as energy, textiles and real estate. Their backgrounds combine operational leadership with strategic oversight, supported by formal business education and direct involvement in managing group companies. This blend of experience strengthens the board’s ability to guide Din Energy effectively.


Board Effectiveness

The board operates with a clear governance structure and holds regular meetings to deliberate on core matters such as plant operations, financial planning, regulatory compliance, and risk management. With each member deeply involved in the broader activities of the Din Group, discussions are both informed and grounded in real-time business realities.


Financial Transparency

Din Energy’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2024 were audited by BDO Ebrahim & Co., a top-tier firm rated in the ‘A’ category by the State Bank of Pakistan. The auditors issued an unqualified opinion, reflecting the accuracy and reliability of the company's financial reporting. The audit for FY25 is currently underway and being carried out in accordance with all applicable regulations.


Management
Organizational Structure

Din Energy operates under a lean and efficient organizational framework that is typical of Independent Power Producers (IPPs). The structure focuses primarily on core financial and technical functions, while specialized services such as engineering, construction, and plant operations are outsourced to expert third-party contractors. This model ensures operational efficiency, cost control, and access to high-quality technical expertise without overextending internal resources.


Management Team

The company’s day-to-day operations are overseen by Mr. Farhad Shaikh Mohammad, who has played a central role in directing the company's strategic and operational priorities. He is supported by Mr. Mansoor Khan, an experienced project head with expertise in managing large-scale infrastructure and energy projects. Together, they are backed by a capable management team that brings a strong blend of technical knowledge, project execution skills, and leadership continuity to the organization.


Effectiveness

Din Energy’s management emphasizes structured decision-making and streamlined processes to enhance overall efficiency. With strong internal controls in place, the company ensures operational discipline and timely execution across all key functions.


Control Environment

Din Energy continues to invest in advanced IT systems to strengthen its internal controls and operational output. With enterprise solutions such as SAP, the company has enhanced its ability to monitor performance, streamline processes, and ensure data accuracy across various functions.


Operational Risk
Power Purchase Agreement

DIN Energy is being developed in accordance with the Renewable Energy Policy of 2006. The Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) has been executed with CPPA-G and carries a tenure of 25 years, ensuring a long-term commitment to energy supply.


Operation and Maintenance

The company has secured a long-term Operation and Maintenance (O&M) contract that commenced on March 27, 2024. This agreement is with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy and Orient Energy, ensuring expert management of plant operations.


Resource Risk

Wind resource risk, as defined under the Renewable Energy Policy 2006, pertains to the variability in wind speed. According to the EPA, the Developer assumes responsibility for wind-related risks and any losses arising from such variations. However, in the event of curtailment by the power purchaser, the plant is entitled to receive NPMVs (Non project missed values) compensation based on estimated power generation.


Insurance Cover

DIN Energy has secured insurance coverage with Adamjee Insurance for all operational risks, business interruption, third-party liabilities, and property damage. This insurance is effective from March 2025 to March 2026, ensuring comprehensive protection throughout the initial period of operations.


Performance Risk
Industry Dynamics

FY2025, external factors remained a key consideration, with the government’s ongoing reforms directly impacting Independent Power Producers (IPPs). These include tariff renegotiations, a gradual shift from take-or-pay to demand-linked take-and-pay agreements, and possible revisions or terminations of long-term PPAs. Along with circular debt settlement measures and the anticipated transition toward the Competitive Trading Bilateral Contract Market (CTBCM), these regulatory changes are expected to shape the industry outlook and investment dynamics.

During the year, Pakistan’s total electricity generation remained broadly stable, while overall consumption fell by 3.6% in the first three quarters due to high tariffs and rising off-grid solar adoption. Momentum, however, shifted in the fourth quarter, with demand surging by 35% to 58% as industrial users returned to the national grid, supported by macroeconomic stabilization and renewed engagement with IPPs. In the generation mix, hydel power contributed the most with 31.44%, followed by RLNG at 17.48%, local coal at 12.23%, imported coal at 7.13%, and smaller shares from nuclear, gas, wind, and furnace oil. Solar added about 5%, with rapid industrial and commercial adoption through captive and net-metered installations continuing to reshape sector dynamics by lowering grid demand and creating utilization pressure on conventional IPPs.


Generation

The Company achieved it's COD in March 2022, and has generated energy 111.42GWh of electricity during FY25, this figure is reported excluding NPMVs.


Performance Benchmark

The Power Purchase Agreement specifies performance benchmarks for the Company, including an annual generation target of 166.440 GWh and a minimum capacity factor of 38%.


Financial Risk
Financing Structure Analysis

The total project cost approved under NEPRA is USD 63.906mln, consisting of 80% of debt (USD 51.12ml) and 20% of equity (USD 12.78mln). The debt financing constitutes foreign loan of USD 25.89 mln (3MSOFR+4.25%) and the local loan is of PKR 4.5bln (SBP refinancing rate of 3%+1.75%). The foreign loan has the maturity of 13 years while the local loan has maturity of 10 years. Both the local and foreign loan are repayable in quarterly installments. Local and foreign loan facility will be settled in 40 and 52 quarterly installments respectively. As of now Din energy has paid off its 35% of local loan and 19% of foreign loan.


Liquidity Profile

During FY25, DEL has liquidated its investment in mutual funds also had a better recovery from the power purchaser depicting improved liquidity profile of the Company.


Working Capital Financing

Renewable IPPs do not have to pay for fuel which minimize their working capital needs, however in order to keep plant operational O&M activities needs to be funded. Net working capital days of the DEL stood at 83 days as of FY25. DEL uses mix of internal cash generation and short-term working capital lines to meet the operational needs.


Cash Flow Analysis

The stability and sustainability of future cash flows of DIN Energy depends completely on continuous performance of its wind turbines. Free cashflow of DEL during for FY25 stood at ~PKR 1347mln (FY24: PKR 1,866mln , FY23: PKR 818mln). Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA/Finance Cost) as at FY25 clocked at 1.9x (FY24: 2.2x, FY23: 1.1x). In order to make quarterly principal repayments of debt, which also includes foreign debt, the Company maintains the Payment Service Reserve Account (PSRA), which is equivalent to two quarterly payments (six months).


Capitalization

DEL's leveraging at year end June 25, stood at 73.9% (FY24 :74.1% ,FY23: 79.8%), majorly comprises of project related debt. The Company has been paying its principal and interest instalments as per their agreement with the financing authority and going forward with timely repayments leveraging is expected to decrease.


 
 

Oct-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-25
12M
Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 11,822 12,225 12,944
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 658 705 1,293
a. Inventories 0 0 0
b. Trade Receivables 572 611 777
5. Total Assets 12,480 12,930 14,236
6. Current Liabilities 242 180 794
a. Trade Payables 216 132 681
7. Borrowings 8,850 9,437 10,720
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 3 8 12
10. Net Assets 3,385 3,306 2,711
11. Shareholders' Equity 3,385 3,306 2,711
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 1,825 2,313 1,987
a. Cost of Good Sold (1,000) (996) (852)
2. Gross Profit 824 1,317 1,135
a. Operating Expenses (23) (25) (19)
3. Operating Profit 801 1,292 1,117
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 24 49 (20)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 825 1,340 1,097
a. Total Finance Cost (740) (859) (761)
b. Taxation (6) (8) (7)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 80 473 329
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,349 1,866 818
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 630 1,028 806
c. Changes in Working Capital 119 (446) (952)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 749 582 (146)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (22) 2 8
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (715) (1,010) (546)
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 13 (426) (685)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) -21.1% 16.4% 292.9%
b. Gross Profit Margin 45.2% 56.9% 57.1%
c. Net Profit Margin 4.4% 20.5% 16.5%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 80.5% 61.4% -6.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 2.3% 13.6% 12.6%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 118 110 110
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 84 45 -92
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 2.7 3.9 1.6
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 1.9 2.2 1.1
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 0.8 1.1 0.5
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 14.1 9.3 162.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 72.3% 74.1% 79.8%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 0.0 0.0 0.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 8.0% 8.4% 7.8%

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

Oct-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Oct-25

www.pacra.com