Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
26-Mar-25 A- A2 Stable Initial -
About the Entity

A. Rahim Foods was incorporated in 1987 as a Private Limited Company. The Company’s ownership is split between two members, Mr. Anwaar Hussain and his brother Mr. Noman Hussain. Under their able leadership, the group has transformed itself into a fast growing business. The CEO is Mr. Anwaar Hussain. He is assisted by a group of professionals.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings of A. Rahim Foods (Private) Limited (“A. Rahim Foods” or “the Company”) reflect the Company’s dominant market position, operational performance, and ability to diversify and innovate its chosen segment of business. The Company benefits from the strong brand equity of its flagship products under the “Dawn” brand. Additionally, it has further strengthened its market presence through its sister companies: Dawn Frozen Foods Company (Pvt.) Limited, ATA Bakery Solutions (Pvt.) Limited, and AB Mauri Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited (engaged in yeast and bakery ingredients).
These ratings are also supported by the extensive industry experience of the Company’s sponsors and its highly qualified management team. Although the Company has not yet established formal board committees, this presents an opportunity to enhance its governance structure. A. Rahim Foods offers a diverse portfolio of products that cater to the varied needs of consumers across over 150 cities in Pakistan, with an extensive range of stock-keeping units (SKUs).
As a prominent player in the food processing sector, A. Rahim Foods has consistently achieved revenue growth while effectively managing market fluctuations, ensuring a robust financial standing. The Company’s recent expansion, which includes a state-of-the-art automated plant in Muridke, has significantly enhanced its production capabilities, further strengthening its market share. From a business standpoint, the Company generates revenue from seven product segments, including bread, buns, burgers, flatbread, paratha (frozen), rusk, and sweet cakes/muffins. Bread constitutes approximately 48% of total revenue, with burgers contributing around 36%, underscoring their importance in the Company’s overall financial performance.
The Company saw positive growth in its top line, driven by higher sales volumes. In FY24, the Company achieved a total revenue of PKR 12 billion (FY23: PKR 8 billion), representing an impressive 42% increase. However, the Company faced challenges from rising raw material costs due to inflation, which led to an approximately 8.6% decline in its gross profit margin. Despite higher finance costs, the net profit margin remained stable at around 2.3%. The margins have improved in the ongoing financial year, as represented by the management.
The Company’s maintains a sound financial risk profile, supported by sufficient coverage and a well-managed working capital cycle. Leverage indicators are stable, with debt levels kept low—primarily consisting of short-term borrowings to finance working capital needs and long-term borrowings for expansion projects. The Company’s proactive approach to market dynamics, adherence to global product quality standards, focus on customer satisfaction, and alignment with industry benchmarks further support its credit ratings.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings are dependent on the management’s ability to maintain margins while ensuring self-sufficiency and sufficient surplus for expansion. Maintaining sound financial discipline, prudent working capital management, and adequate cash flow and coverage will be crucial for ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

A. Rahim Foods (Pvt.) Limited (‘A. Rahim Foods’ or ‘the Company’) is an unlisted Private Limited Company, incorporated in 1987, under the erstwhile Companies Ordinance, 1984 (now the Companies Act, 2017). The Company’s registered office is located in Lahore.


Background

The first Dawn plant was set up and commissioned in Karachi in October 1981 with the purpose of creating awareness and demand for a variety of bread products. It was not long before the name became synonymous with ‘Vitamin Enriched Bread’ and a second plant was commissioned in Islamabad in 1985. Since then, Dawn has done many accomplishments; It has managed to capture 35% of the consolidated market share of all bread products in Pakistan within a decade of inception. Operating for nearly 4 decades, Dawn Bread is the only brand in Pakistan that delivers freshly baked bread in its 3 provinces. The group has further diversified with Dawn Foods (a frozen foods manufacturer), ATA Bakery Solutions (a producer of premium bakery products) and the recently established international brand, Doughstory (a manufacturer and exporter of frozen food and bakery products). AB Mauri Pakistan (Private) Limited (Manufacturer of Yeast) is, a joint venture of AB Foods International and A Rahim Foods, devoted to the baking industry engaged in yeast and bakery ingredients.


Operations

The Company's operations are primarily focused in the Punjab region, and it boasts one of the largest delivery fleets in Pakistan, with over 1,000 vehicles. Serving more than 150 cities nationwide, the company efficiently reaches every retail store that wishes to carry its products. The production plants are located in Lahore (Kot Lakpat) and Muridke. The total annual production capacities for each product are as follows: 354.7 million units for buns and burgers, 109.3 million units for bread, 10 million units for rusks, 10 million units for muffins and cakes, and 80.3 million units for bread.


Ownership
Ownership Structure

The Company’s ownership is split between two members, Mr. Anwaar Hussain and his brother Mr. Noman Hussain. Constituting 50% each.





Stability

A. Rahim Foods is family owned. Both brothers hold strong ties, as they have jointly led the Company to its present stage. Further, family engagement under a well designed integrated plan may be needed.


Business Acumen

The sponsors bring extensive experience and expertise in the food and bakery industry. Their sound business acumen has been instrumental in driving the Company’s sustained success over the years. With deep industry-specific knowledge, hands-on experience, and strategic foresight, the sponsors have played a key role in shaping the Company’s growth and long-term achievements.


Financial Strength

The Company has successfully diversified into various food segments. Additionally, the Company draws its financial strength from its group entities, including Dawn Frozen Food, ATA Bakery, and ARF itself.


Governance
Board Structure

The Board is not truly independent of the management. The Board of the Company is composed of two members, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Both members serve as Executive Directors, actively involved in the day-to-day management and strategic decision-making of the Company.


Members’ Profile

Mr. Anwaar Hussain- CEO and Director has been managing the affairs of Dawn Foods Group for the last 20 years. With his expertise and diversified experience, he successfully expanded the Group into multiple industries with success stories in frozen food and ambient carbohydrate businesses, including the largest distribution network in Pakistan that consists of a country-wide network of 30 warehouses. Mr. Noman Hussain, has been managing the affairs of Dawn Group for last 18 years as a Group Director. Mr. Noman holds a MBA in Business Administration and Management, from the University of Connecticut, USA.


Board Effectiveness

The Company has yet to establish formal board committees, which presents an opportunity for further enhancement in its governance structure. The Board meets on an annual basis, though formal minutes of the meetings are not documented.


Financial Transparency

The External Auditors of the Company M/S Crowe Hussain Chaudhry & Co. Chartered Accountant a QCR-rated firm expressed an unqualified opinion of Financial Statements for the period ended Jun’24. The Firm is Category ‘A’ on SBP panel.


Management
Organizational Structure

The Company employs a horizontal organizational structure, with each department managed by department heads reporting directly to the Executive Directors. The Company functions across 9 key areas: (i) Admin, (ii) Sales, (iii) Marketing, (iv) Supply chain, (v) Finance, (vi) R & D, (vi) Quality, (vii) Human Resource and (viii) Technical & (ix) Quality.  Mr. Anwaar Hussain, the CEO, oversees the Sales, Finance, Human Resource, Supply Chain, and Marketing departments. Mr. Noman, on the other hand, leads the R&D, Quality, Technical, Administration, and Information Technology departments.


Management Team

Mr. Anwaar Hussain serves as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company. A seasoned professional and a distinguished member of the Young Presidents' Organization (YPO), Mr. Anwaar brings a proactive and dynamic approach to his role. With extensive industry experience and a deep understanding of the sector, he effectively inspires and leads the team. The CEO is supported by a team of highly experienced professionals. Mr. Noman Hussain has been overseeing the operations of the Dawn Group for the past 18 years in his role as Group Director. He holds an MBA in Business Administration and Management from the University of Connecticut, USA. Mr. Harris Mahmood, FCA, serves as the Group Chief Financial Officer, overseeing the Strategy, Finance, Legal, Internal Audit, and Information Technology functions across the group. This includes 100% owned legal entities in multiple countries, as well as global and local joint ventures. Mr. Harris brings over 20 years of overall experience.


Effectiveness

There are currently no formal management committees in place. However, the management team convenes its meeting on monthly basis to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the Company's operations.


MIS

The Company utilizes SAP software, a specialized ERP solution designed for manufacturers and tool producers. The software is continuously monitored and maintained by the vendor to ensure optimal performance.


Control Environment

The Company has a robust internal audit function outsourced to EY Ford Rhodes, which enhances risk management, control, and governance processes, while driving continuous business improvements through the development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Additionally, the Company holds several prestigious certifications, including HACCP, Halal, FDA, ISO 9001, ISO 22000, and Kosher, demonstrating its strong commitment to adhering to the highest industry standards of quality, safety, and compliance.


Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

In Pakistan, the convenience food market is primarily dominated by domestically produced products. This industry is highly competitive, with products that are particularly sensitive to price fluctuations. A significant portion of the market is also held by unbranded products, which play a notable role. Production of food groups increased by 1.7 percent in FY24, compared to a contraction of 7.1 percent in FY23. Where the sugar confectionary market covering 20% exports of Prepared Foodstuffs; Beverages, Spirits, Vinegar and Tobacco, showed the growth of 13.9% during FY24 compared to 8.9% during FY23. The food sector in Pakistan is experiencing rapid growth, driven by population increase, inflation,  urbanization, and evolving consumer lifestyles.


Relative Position

The Company has established strong brand recognition in the bread and buns industry, with its flagship products, "Dawn Bread" and "Dawn Burger Buns," becoming widely recognized for their quality and reliability. The Company has managed to capture ~35% of the consolidated market share of all bread products in Pakistan within a decade of inception.


Revenues

A. Rahim Foods, a prominent player in the food processing and distribution sector, has consistently demonstrated revenue growth and successfully navigated market fluctuations, maintaining a strong financial position. The Company's revenue is derived from seven product segments, including bread, buns, burgers, flatbread, frozen paratha, rusk, and sweet cakes/ muffins. Bread constitutes ~48% of the Company’s total revenue, with burgers contributing ~36%, cakes/ muffins contributing ~9% followed by rusk ~4 and others ~3%, reflecting their essential role in the Company’s overall financial performance. The Company saw a positive trend in its topline, driven by higher sales volumes and increased prices. In FY24, the Company achieved total revenue of PKR 12bln (FY23: PKR 8bln), representing an impressive increase of ~42%.


Margins

During FY24, the gross profit margin decreased to 19.6% from 22.5% compared to the previous year, primarily due to rising raw material and energy costs and a challenging market environment. This trend was further reflected in operational activities, as operating expenses surged by 54.5%, increasing from PKR 1,059 million in FY23 to PKR 1,637 million in FY24, primarily driven by higher selling and marketing expenses. As a result, operating profit margins contracted to 6.2% in FY24, compared to 10% in FY23. The cumulative impact of these factors led to a reduction in net profit margins, which fell to 2.3% from 3.2%. Net profit reached PKR 282 million in FY24, a modest increase from PKR 275 million in FY23. This improvement was also supported by a slight reduction in finance costs due to lower borrowings. The Return on Equity (ROE) remained relatively stable at 10.3% in FY24, compared to 10.7% in FY23, reflecting consistent performance in generating returns on shareholders' equity. Overall, while the Company remained profitable, it faced significant cost pressure that impacted its margin performance.  The margins have improved in the ongoing financial year, as represented by the management. 


Sustainability

The Company has shown growth trajectory since its inception and now the drive towards the future is stronger.


Financial Risk
Working capital

A. Rahim Foods’ working capital requirements are driven by its inventory, trade receivables, and trade payables, and are financed through short-term borrowings and free cash flow from operations (FCFO). In FY24, the average inventory days slightly improved, reducing to 8 days in FY24 from 9 days in FY23, indicating efficient inventory management and optimized stock levels to balance demand with minimal holding costs. Trade receivable days remained negligible at 24 days on average, reflecting the company’s efficient receivables collection practices.This led to improved Gross working capital days at 31 days (FY23: 39 days).  However, trade payables stood at 23 days, lower than in the previous period (FY23 38 days). These contributed to a net working capital cycle of 9 days.  The current ratio stood at 1.6, compared to 1.3 in the previous period, indicating improved liquidity and a stronger ability to meet short-term obligations. Overall, the results suggest that the Company has made progress in streamlining its working capital, although there remain areas for continued improvement in managing payables and receivables more efficiently.


Coverages

The EBITDA-to-Finance Cost ratio slightly increased to 3.6x (FY23: 3.4x), signaling a increased capacity to cover finance costs through operational earnings. The FCFO-to-Finance Cost ratio has weakened to 2.9x from 3.0x, indicating tighter cash flow coverage of financial obligations. T he Company’s Free Cash Flow from Operations (FCFO) decreased by 3.8%, dropping from PKR 1,127 million in FY23 to PKR 1,084 million in FY24 due to increase in taxes paid. This decline in operational cash flow, however, still reflects the Company’s adequate operational performance and cash generation capacity. The Company’s financial health is further demonstrated by a debt payback ratio of 3.0x, signifying a solid ability to manage and reduce its debt obligations effectively.




Capitalization

The Company maintains a moderately leveraged capital structure, with a consistent leverage ratio of 49.3% in FY24, reflecting a prudent borrowing strategy. As of FY24, the Company’s total borrowings consist of both short-term and long-term debt, primarily utilized for working capital management and expansion purposes. Repayments on the long-term loan under TERF are being made progressively over time, secured against a pledge of fixed assets. Total borrowings slightly decreased to PKR 2,682 million in FY24, compared to PKR 2,705 million in FY23. The Company’s capital structure remains well-balanced, with a solid equity base of PKR 2.7 billion in FY24. This growth in equity strengthens the Company’s financial position, providing a buffer against financial risks and reinforcing its capacity to service debt. Going forward, the leverage ratio is expected to remain stable, as the Company has no plans for additional long-term debt borrowing.


 
 

Mar-25

www.pacra.com


Jun-24
12M
Jun-23
12M
Jun-22
12M
Audited Audited Audited
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 5,897 5,974 5,450
2. Investments 0 0 0
3. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
4. Current Assets 1,542 1,629 1,218
a. Inventories 244 255 143
b. Trade Receivables 892 676 725
5. Total Assets 7,438 7,603 6,668
6. Current Liabilities 979 1,229 1,115
a. Trade Payables 661 837 948
7. Borrowings 2,682 2,705 2,287
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 1,022 957 820
10. Net Assets 2,755 2,712 2,446
11. Shareholders' Equity 2,755 2,712 2,446
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 12,145 8,495 5,996
a. Cost of Good Sold (9,761) (6,587) (4,782)
2. Gross Profit 2,384 1,907 1,214
a. Operating Expenses (1,637) (1,059) (807)
3. Operating Profit 747 849 407
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 101 120 107
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 848 969 514
a. Total Finance Cost (391) (404) (154)
b. Taxation (175) (289) (129)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 282 275 232
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,084 1,127 559
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 709 809 424
c. Changes in Working Capital (68) (428) 686
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 641 381 1,110
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (187) (655) (2,948)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities (338) 219 1,819
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 115 (55) (19)
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 43.0% 41.7% 38.1%
b. Gross Profit Margin 19.6% 22.5% 20.3%
c. Net Profit Margin 2.3% 3.2% 3.9%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 8.4% 8.2% 20.8%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 10.3% 10.7% 10.0%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 31 39 50
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 9 0 8
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 1.6 1.3 1.1
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 3.6 3.4 6.3
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 1.0 1.2 1.0
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 3.0 3.1 5.0
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 49.3% 49.9% 48.3%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 58.5 83.3 58.9
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 13.9% 15.1% 7.3%

Mar-25

www.pacra.com

Mar-25

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Mar-25

www.pacra.com