Rating History
Dissemination Date Long-Term Rating Short-Term Rating Outlook Action Rating Watch
20-Dec-24 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-23 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
22-Dec-22 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-21 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
24-Dec-20 A- A2 Stable Maintain -
About the Entity

United Ethanol Industries Limited is a public unlisted Company. Primary business activity of the Company involves manufacturing and sale of industrial grade ethanol. United Ethanol has a installed production capacity of 120,000 liters per day. The Company was incorporated in 2003, and is part of United Group. The Group entities include two sugar mills (Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills and SGM Sugar Mills), United Ethanol Industries Limited, Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals and, Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited. The Essarani Family acquired the Company in 2016. Shareholding of the Company rests with Essarani Family. The Company is headed by Dr. Tara Chand, the CEO. He is ably supported by a team of experienced professionals.

Rating Rationale

The assigned ratings affirm United Ethanol as an established player in Pakistan’s ethanol industry. A key contributing factor to the ratings is United Ethanol's affiliation with the well-established United Group, which holds a prominent presence in the country's sugar and related industries. The Company leverages its comparative advantage, stemming from the support of sugar mills (SGM Sugar Mills and Sindh Abadgar Sugar Mills) at the group level and its widespread geographical presence, resulting in a strong financial performance. The market risk the Company may face includes fluctuations in sugarcane yields and quality, influenced by agronomic conditions and cyclical variations in crop production. Additionally, raw material price volatility further accentuates operational uncertainty, necessitating adept supply chain and cost management. Global ethanol prices have remained demoted, driven by economic uncertainties on a global scale which ultimately stress the profitability matrix. The effect of falling international ethanol prices was further exacerbated by the dollar exchange rate. The Company also faced economic and operational challenges, including the complexities arising from the contrast between market-driven sugarcane prices and government-regulated rates. With the government's shift to deregulated pricing of sugarcane, the cost of goods sold is expected to decline moving forward, as prices are determined by market forces rather than fixed regulations. This transition to a market-driven pricing model will likely lead to more competitive pricing, encouraging efficiency and cost reduction across industries. However, this shift may introduce risks that could discourage farmers from cultivating sugarcane. On the financial profile side, United Ethanol derives its revenue from ethanol (~97% export market and ~3% local market). During MY24, the United Ethanol topline has reflected a ~22% YoY incline primarily due to increased ethanol exports. Despite this, local sales also showed resilience with a 19% YoY increase, driven by domestic demand. Profitability metrics showed an eroding performance, as gross margins declined due to high procurement cost of molasses. Similarly, operating margin also mirrored the same effect and decline resulting from high operating expenses mainly selling and administration. Meanwhile, net margins were also squeezed as a result of higher financing expenses in the context of a high-interest-rate environment. On the other side, leverage indicators continue to remain stable on account of the utilization of short-term borrowing predominantly consisting of the ERF- Part II. This financial resilience is further reinforced by robust coverages and effective management of working capital.

Key Rating Drivers

The ratings hinge on the management's adeptness in consistently preserving profit margins. It is imperative that the management exercises prudent debt management and ensures robust liquidity, as these factors play a pivotal role in determining the ratings. A substantial rise in debt, decline in coverages, will adversely affect the ratings.

Profile
Legal Structure

United Ethanol Industries Limited, referred to as "United Ethanol" or "the Company," operates as a publicly unlisted entity.

Background

United Ethanol Industries Limited was established in 2003 and was initially owned by the Etihad Group, a prominent business conglomerate. Over the years, the company gained recognition in the ethanol production industry. However, on September 16th, a significant transition took place when ownership of the company was acquired by the Essarani Family. This acquisition marked a pivotal moment in the company’s history, as it subsequently became a vital part of the United Group, a diversified business entity with a strong presence in various sectors. The Essarani Family’s leadership and strategic vision have since played a crucial role in shaping the future direction and growth of the company within the United Group.

Operations

The company's manufacturing facility is strategically located in Sadiqabad, Rahimyar Khan, providing easy access to 11 sugar mills within a 100-kilometer radius, including its own subsidiary, SGM Sugar Mills. Specializing in the production of ENA Grade ethanol (~96% v/v ethanol) and B Grade ethanol (~94% v/v ethanol), the facility boasts an installed production capacity of 120,000 liters per day. In the fiscal year 2024 (MY24), the company produced 34,966,246 liters of ethanol, a decrease from the 39,170,829 liters produced in MY23, reflecting an 11% decline. This reduction is primarily attributed to challenges in molasses procurement and availability

Ownership
Ownership Structure

The ownership structure of the company is held by the Essarani Family, with Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani holding a ~24% stake. His four sons are also significant shareholders: Mr. Asha Ram owns ~29%, Dr. Tara Chand holds ~24%, Mahesh Kumar possesses ~22%, and Mr. Jugdesh Kumar has a ~1% stake in the Company. This distribution reflects a family-controlled ownership model, ensuring that decision-making remains centralized within the family, which can contribute to a unified long-term strategic vision for the company.

Stability

Given the current ownership distribution and the strong family involvement, it is unlikely that significant changes will occur in the near future. The family's control of the majority of shares and the absence of outside investors suggest that the enterprise is positioned for continuity. This stability provides a solid foundation for maintaining long-term operations and can also foster trust with stakeholders, including employees, customers, and business partners, who value consistency in leadership and direction.

Business Acumen

The Essarani family brings a wealth of experience in the agricultural sector, operating under the umbrella of the 'United Group.' The group's diversified portfolio spans multiple industries, with key assets including two sugar mills—Sindh Abadgar's Sugar Mills and SGM Sugar Mills. Additionally, the family’s holdings extend to United Ethanol Industries Limited, a major player in ethanol production, as well as Agro Trade Private Limited, United Agro Chemicals and, Synergy Packaging (Pvt.) Limited which further strengthen the group's presence in the agricultural and chemical industries.

Financial Strength

The company maintains robust financial stability attributed to the support of its group and sponsors. As of the MY23, the group's total assets amounted to ~PKR 29bln, backed by an equity base of around PKR 13.2bln. During this period, the group achieved a net profit of ~PKR 1,682mln. The group maintains a moderate level of leverage. This stable financial position the Company for continued growth and resilience in the face of market fluctuations.

Governance
Board Structure

The Board of Directors is composed of four members, encompassing the Chairman, CEO, and two Non-Executive Directors. The board is predominantly influenced by the sponsoring family, lacking independent oversight, signifying an opportunity for enhancement. The sponsors have expressed their intention to augment the Board's composition by appointing an independent director in the future.

Members’ Profile

Mr. Deoo Mal Essarani serves as the Chairman of the Board and also holds the position of Chairman on the board of two other group companies, namely Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills Limited and SGM Sugar Mills Limited. With over 47 years of experience, he assumed the chairmanship role. Meanwhile, his son, Mr. Mahesh Kumar, serves as a Non-Executive Director, bringing more than 21 years of experience to the board. Additionally, Mr. Mahesh Kumar holds a position on the board of Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills Limited.

Board Effectiveness

During the MY24, the Board of Directors convened for a total of four meetings, ensuring that detailed and formal minutes were recorded for each of these sessions. These meetings served as key opportunities for the Board to discuss and make decisions on various matters concerning the company’s operations, strategies, and governance. At this time, United Ethanol has not implemented any specific Board committees, which are often used by companies to delegate particular responsibilities or areas of oversight to smaller, specialized groups within the Board. Without these committees, all decision-making and oversight duties fall directly to the full Board.

Financial Transparency

The Company's external auditors are Reanda Haroon Zakaria & Co. Chartered Accountants The audit firm is rated in category 'B' of SBP's panel of auditors.

Management
Organizational Structure

The Company's organizational structure is clearly defined, with distinct reporting lines that differentiate responsibilities between the production site and the head office. Operational functions are primarily overseen by the General Manager (GM) of the Mill, who is responsible for day-to-day production activities. On the other hand, support functions, with the exception of finance, are managed centrally at the group level. These functions are under the supervision of the Group Chief Financial Officer, who ensures consistent oversight and alignment with the company’s overall strategy.

Management Team

The Company’s management team is composed of experienced professionals, although they have not been with the Company for an extended period. Dr. Tara Chand, the CEO, brings over 15 years of expertise in the sugar and allied industries. In addition to his role as CEO of the Company, Dr. Chand also serves as the CEO of Sindh Abadgar’s Sugar Mills. He is supported by a skilled leadership team, including Mr. Abdul Waheed, who serves as the General Manager (GM) of the Factory, and Mr. Saqib Ghaffar is the Group Director Finance. Together, they provide strong leadership and direction for the Company.

Effectiveness

The Company currently does not have formally established management committees. However, the management team engages in regular performance discussions to assess and review ongoing activities. These discussions allow the leadership to evaluate the progress of various initiatives, address challenges, and ensure alignment with the Company’s strategic goals.

MIS

The Company has implemented Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software from Cosmosoft to streamline its operations and enhance efficiency. This software helps integrate various business processes, providing a centralized system for managing key functions such as inventory, production, finance, and human resources.

Control Environment

The internal audit function is currently centralized at the group level. Going forward, the group plans to enhance its control environment by expanding the internal audit team, adding more personnel to oversight and improve the effectiveness of internal controls across the organization.

Business Risk
Industry Dynamics

Pakistan's ethanol industry is export-focused due to limited domestic consumption, with ~50%-70% of production being exported. In MY23, the country's ethanol exports reached 595 million liters (MY22: 800mln liters), marking an ~25%decrease. Global market prices have been elevated due to heightened ethanol demand, despite global economic uncertainties. The impact of high international prices was amplified by the devaluation of the Pakistani Rupee. Improved sugarcane production in MY24, alongside stable profits for domestic distilleries, is expected to keep industry margins steady in the current fiscal year. However, the industry faces increased raw material costs from the elevated price of molasses.

Relative Position

In MY24, the company represented 5% of Pakistan's overall ethanol exports.

Revenues

The Company’s revenue stream is heavily reliant on exports, which account for ~97% of total revenue in MY24. This export-centric revenue model support the Company’s financial performance and exposes it to both opportunities and risks associated with global market dynamics. In MY24, the Company experienced a significant revenue increase, reaching PKR 7.4 billion, up from PKR 6 billion in MY23. This growth represents a ~22% year-on-year improvement, which can be attributed to the Company benefited from macroeconomic factors such as the depreciation of the Pakistani rupee, despite reduced ethanol prices and less quantity produced. The currency devaluation made the Company’s exports more competitive in the global market.

Margins

During MY24, the company faced challenges in managing the rising cost of raw materials, particularly molasses, which is a key input in its production process. Despite the escalation in procurement costs, the Company was unable to effectively pass on these increased expenses to the export market, which directly impacted its profitability. As a result, the company's margins contracted. The gross margin saw a notable decline, dropping to ~21.2% in MY24, compared to ~35.7% in MY23. This ~14.5% decrease reflects the significant pressure that raw material costs have exerted on the Company’s ability to maintain profitability at the production level. Similarly, the operating margin also experienced a deterioration, decreasing to ~14.7% in MY24 from ~28.8% in MY23. Indicates that the company faced higher operational costs, including both raw material procurement and possibly other operational expenses. As a result of these margin contractions, the company’s bottom line also saw a decline. The net income for MY24 stood at PKR 825 million, down by ~22% from PKR 1,065 million in MY23. This drop in profitability is reflected in the company’s net margin, which deteriorated to ~11.1% in MY24 from ~17.6% in the previous year.

Sustainability

The company currently has no significant expansion initiatives in the pipeline. Its primary emphasis lies in enhancing efficiency through BMR efforts.

Financial Risk
Working capital

The Company’s net working capital cycle showed significant improvement in MY24, reducing to 125 days from 149 days in MY23. This enhancement in the working capital cycle was primarily driven by a reduction in inventory days, which decreased to 99 days in MY24 from 116 days in the previous year. This suggests that the Company effectively sold its finished inventory, likely due to improved inventory management practices. Furthermore, the Company experienced a decrease in receivable days, which dropped to 29 days in MY24 from 36 days in MY23. This indicates that the Company was more efficient in collecting payments from its customers, thus improving cash flow and reducing the risk associated with outstanding receivables. Conversely, payable days remained relatively stable, with a slight decrease to 3 days in MY24 from 4 days in MY23. This indicates that the Company maintained its payment terms while optimizing its overall working capital cycle.

Coverages

In MY24, the Company showed notable improvement in its financial health, as evidenced by the strengthening of key coverage ratios. The interest coverage ratio increased to 4.8x in MY24, up from 4.2x in MY23. This improvement was primarily driven by a reduction in finance costs during the period, which suggests that the Company benefited from lower borrowing rates and a reduction in its debt levels. Additionally, the Company generated free cash flows of PKR 1,313 million in MY24, compared to PKR 1,726 million in MY23. The Company's debt coverage ratio, which evaluates its ability to service both interest and principal repayments, also showed a positive trend, rising to 3.2x in MY24 from 2.5x in MY23. This increase indicates that the Company is in a stronger financial position and better able to meet its debt obligations moving forward.

Capitalization

The Company's Debt-to-Equity ratio remained relatively stable and low leveraged in MY24, standing at ~28%, compared to ~29% in MY23. This slight decrease in the ratio reflects a marginal reduction in the Company’s financial leverage, indicating that the Company has maintained a balanced capital structure over the past year. Total borrowings slightly increased to PKR 2,676 million in MY24, up from PKR 2,543 million in MY23. This increase in borrowings was primarily due to a higher reliance on working capital financing. The Company does not have any long-term borrowings, which means its debt profile is relatively more flexible. Equity, on the other hand, increased to PKR 6.8 billion in MY24, up from PKR 6 billion in MY23. This growth in equity reflects retained earnings, which has helped the Company boost its net worth.

 
 

Dec-24

www.pacra.com


Sep-24
12M
Sep-23
12M
Sep-22
12M
A. BALANCE SHEET
1. Non-Current Assets 3,694 3,724 3,423
2. Investments 2 0 300
3. Related Party Exposure 299 540 0
4. Current Assets 5,968 4,732 5,182
a. Inventories 1,543 2,448 1,390
b. Trade Receivables 685 508 687
5. Total Assets 9,964 8,997 8,905
6. Current Liabilities 397 389 273
a. Trade Payables 78 64 57
7. Borrowings 2,676 2,543 3,546
8. Related Party Exposure 0 0 0
9. Non-Current Liabilities 0 0 0
10. Net Assets 6,891 6,065 5,086
11. Shareholders' Equity 6,890 6,065 5,086
B. INCOME STATEMENT
1. Sales 7,424 6,044 6,456
a. Cost of Good Sold (5,851) (3,886) (4,569)
2. Gross Profit 1,573 2,158 1,886
a. Operating Expenses (479) (419) (344)
3. Operating Profit 1,093 1,738 1,542
a. Non Operating Income or (Expense) 129 (155) (273)
4. Profit or (Loss) before Interest and Tax 1,223 1,584 1,269
a. Total Finance Cost (305) (440) (197)
b. Taxation (92) (79) (80)
6. Net Income Or (Loss) 825 1,065 992
C. CASH FLOW STATEMENT
a. Free Cash Flows from Operations (FCFO) 1,313 1,726 1,296
b. Net Cash from Operating Activities before Working Capital Changes 979 1,331 1,121
c. Changes in Working Capital 932 (720) (1,708)
1. Net Cash provided by Operating Activities 1,911 611 (587)
2. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Investing Activities (137) 164 (49)
3. Net Cash (Used in) or Available From Financing Activities 199 (1,375) 874
4. Net Cash generated or (Used) during the period 1,973 (600) 238
D. RATIO ANALYSIS
1. Performance
a. Sales Growth (for the period) 22.8% -6.4% N/A
b. Gross Profit Margin 21.2% 35.7% 29.2%
c. Net Profit Margin 11.1% 17.6% 15.4%
d. Cash Conversion Efficiency (FCFO adjusted for Working Capital/Sales) 30.2% 16.6% -6.4%
e. Return on Equity [ Net Profit Margin * Asset Turnover * (Total Assets/Shareholders' Equity )] 12.7% 19.1% 19.5%
2. Working Capital Management
a. Gross Working Capital (Average Days) 128 152 117
b. Net Working Capital (Average Days) 125 149 114
c. Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) 15.0 12.2 19.0
3. Coverages
a. EBITDA / Finance Cost 5.3 4.4 7.2
b. FCFO / Finance Cost+CMLTB+Excess STB 3.2 2.5 2.8
c. Debt Payback (Total Borrowings+Excess STB) / (FCFO-Finance Cost) 0.1 0.3 0.6
4. Capital Structure
a. Total Borrowings / (Total Borrowings+Shareholders' Equity) 28.0% 29.5% 41.1%
b. Interest or Markup Payable (Days) 18.8 65.9 106.0
c. Entity Average Borrowing Rate 10.4% 12.8% 5.5%

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

Dec-24

www.pacra.com

  1. Rating Team Statements
    1. Rating is just an opinion about the creditworthiness of the entity and does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security of the entity rated or to buy, hold, or sell the security rated, as the case may be. (Chapter III; 14-3-(x))
    2. Conflict of Interest
      1. The Rating Team or any of their family members have no interest in this rating (Chapter III; 12-2-(j))
      2. PACRA, the analysts involved in the rating process, and members of its rating committee and their family members do not have any conflict of interest relating to the rating done by them (Chapter III; 12-2-(e) & (k))
      3. The analyst is not a substantial shareholder of the customer being rated by PACRA [Annexure F; d-(ii)]
      4. Explanation: for the purpose of the above clause, the term "family members" shall include only those family members who are dependent on the analyst and members of the rating committee.
  2. Restrictions
    1. No director, officer, or employee of PACRA communicates the information acquired by him for use for rating purposes to any other person, except where required under law to do so. (Chapter III; 10-(5))
    2. PACRA does not disclose or discuss with outside parties or make improper use of the non-public information which has come to its knowledge during a business relationship with the customer. (Chapter III; 10-7-(d))
    3. PACRA does not make proposals or recommendations regarding the activities of rated entities that could impact a credit rating of the entity subject to rating. (Chapter III; 10-7-(k))
  3. Conduct of Business
    1. PACRA fulfills its obligations in a fair, efficient, transparent, and ethical manner and renders high standards of services in performing its functions and obligations. (Chapter III; 11-A-(a))
    2. PACRA uses due care in the preparation of this Rating Report. Our information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. PACRA does not, in every instance, independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing this Rating Report. (Clause 11-(A)(p))
    3. PACRA prohibits its employees and analysts from soliciting money, gifts, or favors from anyone with whom PACRA conducts business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(q))
    4. PACRA ensures before the commencement of the rating process that an analyst or employee has not had a recent employment or other significant business or personal relationship with the rated entity that may cause or may be perceived as causing a conflict of interest. (Chapter III; 11-A-(r))
    5. PACRA maintains the principle of integrity in seeking rating business. (Chapter III; 11-A-(u))
    6. PACRA promptly investigates in the event of misconduct or a breach of the policies, procedures, and controls, and takes appropriate steps to rectify any weaknesses to prevent any recurrence, along with suitable punitive action against the responsible employee(s). (Chapter III; 11-B-(m))
  4. Independence & Conflict of Interest
    1. PACRA receives compensation from the entity being rated or any third party for the rating services it offers. The receipt of this compensation has no influence on PACRA’s opinions or other analytical processes. In all instances, PACRA is committed to preserving the objectivity, integrity, and independence of its ratings. Our relationship is governed by two distinct mandates: i) rating mandate - signed with the entity being rated or issuer of the debt instrument, and ii) fee mandate - signed with the payer, which can be different from the entity.
    2. PACRA does not provide consultancy/advisory services or other services to any of its customers or their associated companies and associated undertakings that are being rated or have been rated by it during the preceding three years, unless it has an adequate mechanism in place ensuring that the provision of such services does not lead to a conflict of interest situation with its rating activities. (Chapter III; 12-2-(d))
    3. PACRA discloses that no shareholder directly or indirectly holding 10% or more of the share capital of PACRA also holds directly or indirectly 10% or more of the share capital of the entity which is subject to rating or the entity which issued the instrument subject to rating by PACRA. (Chapter III; 12-2-(f))
    4. PACRA ensures that the rating assigned to an entity or instrument is not affected by the existence of a business relationship between PACRA and the entity or any other party, or the non-existence of such a relationship. (Chapter III; 12-2-(i))
    5. PACRA ensures that the analysts or any of their family members shall not buy, sell, or engage in any transaction in any security which falls in the analyst’s area of primary analytical responsibility. This clause, however, does not apply to investments in securities through collective investment schemes. (Chapter III; 12-2-(l))
    6. PACRA has established policies and procedures governing investments and trading in securities by its employees and for monitoring the same to prevent insider trading, market manipulation, or any other market abuse. (Chapter III; 11-B-(g))
  5. Monitoring and Review
    1. PACRA monitors all the outstanding ratings continuously, and any potential change therein due to any event associated with the issuer, the security arrangement, the industry, etc., is disseminated to the market immediately and in an effective manner after appropriate consultation with the entity/issuer. (Chapter III; 17-(a))
    2. PACRA reviews all the outstanding ratings periodically on an annual basis. Provided that public dissemination of annual review and in an instance of change in rating will be made. (Chapter III; 17-(b))
    3. PACRA initiates an immediate review of the outstanding rating upon becoming aware of any information that may reasonably be expected to result in downgrading of the rating. (Chapter III; 17-(c))
    4. PACRA engages with the issuer and the debt securities trustee to remain updated on all information pertaining to the rating of the entity/instrument. (Chapter III; 17-(d))
  6. Probability of Default
    1. PACRA’s Rating Scale reflects the expectation of credit risk. The highest rating has the lowest relative likelihood of default (i.e., probability). PACRA’s transition studies capture the historical performance behavior of a specific rating notch. Transition behavior of the assigned rating can be obtained from PACRA’s Transition Study available at our website. (www.pacra.com) However, the actual transition of rating may not follow the pattern observed in the past. (Chapter III; 14-3(f)(vii))
  7. Proprietary Information
    1. All information contained herein is considered proprietary by PACRA. Hence, none of the information in this document can be copied or otherwise reproduced, stored, or disseminated in whole or in part in any form or by any means whatsoever by any person without PACRA’s prior written consent.

Dec-24

www.pacra.com